Nuclear Power

Nuclear power plants, fuel suppliers, and small modular reactor developers. Constellation Energy, Vistra, Westinghouse.

49 bills +42 helps −7 harms

Bills that help Nuclear Power

  • International Nuclear Energy Financing Act of 2025
    Rep. Hill, J. French [R-AR-2] · confidence 0.95

    Sec. 3 and Sec. 4 direct the U.S. to advocate for removal of prohibitions on nuclear energy financing at multilateral development banks and to establish trust funds to provide financial and technical assistance for nuclear energy generation and distribution, directly benefiting the nuclear power industry.

  • The U.S.-European Nuclear Energy Cooperation Act of 2025
    Rep. Keating, William R. [D-MA-9] · confidence 0.95

    Section 4(a) requires the Secretary of State to develop a strategy to strengthen United States-European nuclear energy cooperation and combat Russian malign influence in the nuclear energy sector in Europe. Section 4(b) details elements including assessment of U.S. nuclear industry participation, reactor types, fuel cycles, and U.S. government-funded technologies, all aimed at expanding U.S. and allied nuclear industry presence and reducing Russian influence. Section 5 authorizes $30 million ann

  • Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2027
    Rep. Fleischmann, Charles J. "Chuck" [R-TN-3] · confidence 0.95

    Title III includes $1,800,000,000 for Nuclear Energy activities, plus $2,675,000,000 transferred from other accounts for Generation 3+ small modular reactor deployment and demonstration projects, providing substantial funding for nuclear power.

  • International Nuclear Energy Act of 2025
    Sen. Risch, James E. [R-ID] · confidence 0.95

    The bill establishes a whole-of-government strategy for nuclear cooperation and exports, creates a White House focal point for civil nuclear coordination, a Nuclear Exports Working Group, and authorizes funding for international civil nuclear program support, all of which benefit the nuclear power industry by promoting U.S. nuclear energy company exports and international engagement.

  • Build Nuclear with Local Materials Act of 2026
    Sen. Lummis, Cynthia M. [R-WY] · confidence 0.95

    Section 2(a) requires the NRC to initiate rulemaking authorizing use of commercial-grade steel and concrete in non-safety-related structures at nuclear power plants, which reduces material costs and expands construction options for nuclear power operators.

  • A resolution designating December 2, 2025, as "World Nuclear Energy Day".
    Sen. Risch, James E. [R-ID] · confidence 0.95

    Resolution designates December 2, 2025 as 'World Nuclear Energy Day' and celebrates contributions of nuclear energy, honors scientists and engineers, commends global community, and encourages continued cooperation in research, development, and implementation of nuclear energy technologies (see resolved clauses (1)-(5)). This is a clear benefit via recognition and promotion.

  • DOE and NASA Interagency Research Coordination Act
    Rep. Begich, Nicholas [R-AK-At Large] · confidence 0.90

    Section 2(c)(1)(A) includes nuclear thermal and nuclear electric propulsion, radioisotope power systems, advanced nuclear fuels, and heater units as focus areas for collaborative R&D, which benefits nuclear power industry through research funding and technology development.

  • Department of State Policy Provisions Act
    Rep. Mast, Brian J. [R-FL-21] · confidence 0.90

    Section 412 explicitly aims to strengthen U.S.-European nuclear energy cooperation, assess reactor designs and fuel cycles to reduce Russian influence, and promote U.S. nuclear technologies in Europe, directly benefiting nuclear power companies.

  • To reauthorize the West Valley demonstration project.
    Rep. Langworthy, Nicholas A. [R-NY-23] · confidence 0.90

    Section 1 amends the West Valley Demonstration Project Act to increase funding from $75 million to $150 million per fiscal year for FY2027-2037, providing a clear financial benefit to nuclear waste cleanup and related nuclear industry activities.

  • Commerce, Justice, Science; Energy and Water Development; and Interior and Environment Appropriations Act, 2026
    Rep. Cole, Tom [R-OK-4] · confidence 0.90

    Division B, Title III, Department of Energy, Nuclear Energy: $1,785,000,000 for nuclear energy activities, including acquisition or condemnation of real property for plant or facility acquisition, construction, or expansion.

  • Moab UMTRA Project Transition Act of 2025
    Sen. Curtis, John R. [R-UT] · confidence 0.90

    Section 2 amends the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act to transfer the Moab site (a former uranium mill tailings site under DOE's UMTRA Project) to Grand County, Utah, which benefits nuclear power industry stakeholders by facilitating site cleanup and potential land reuse, reducing regulatory burdens.

  • Nuclear REFUEL Act of 2025
    Sen. Husted, Jon [R-OH] · confidence 0.90

    Section 2 amends the Atomic Energy Act to exclude equipment that reprocesses spent nuclear fuel without separating plutonium from the definition of 'production facility', reducing regulatory burden for such nuclear recycling technologies.

  • Recognizing the strategic value of the historical partnership between the United States and India.
    Rep. Bera, Ami [D-CA-6] · confidence 0.90

    Whereas, in 2005, the United States and India issued the joint statement on Civil Nuclear Cooperation leading to the passage of the Henry J. Hyde United States-India Peaceful Atomic Energy Cooperation Act of 2006 and the subsequent conclusion of the United States-India 123 Agreement in 2008; (9) recognizes India's growing energy needs as an essential component of its economic development, and applauds India for increasing its purchases of United States energy resources, which enhance mutual ener

  • Clean Energy Demonstration Transparency Act of 2025
    Rep. Carey, Mike [R-OH-15] · confidence 0.85

    Section 2's reporting requirements apply to clean energy demonstration projects administered or supported by the program, which can include nuclear power projects, thus providing a benefit through increased transparency and potential for better project management.

  • Energy Choice Act
    Rep. Langworthy, Nicholas A. [R-NY-23] · confidence 0.85

    Section 2's protection applies to nuclear energy as an energy source, preventing local restrictions on nuclear power plant connections or distribution based on its source.

  • VET Act of 2025
    Rep. Kiggans, Jennifer A. [R-VA-2] · confidence 0.85

    Section 2(i)(2)(D) explicitly includes 'Nuclear energy components' in the definition of 'equipment and components critical to the energy industry,' making nuclear power entities eligible for grants under the program.

  • Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026
    Rep. Fleischmann, Charles J. "Chuck" [R-TN-3] · confidence 0.85

    Title III provides $1,795,000,000 for nuclear energy activities, including $150,000,000 for loan guarantees for small modular reactors, directly benefiting nuclear power industry.

  • Continuing Appropriations, Agriculture, Legislative Branch, Military Construction and Veterans Affairs, and Extensions Act, 2026
    Rep. Cole, Tom [R-OK-4] · confidence 0.85

    Division B, Title VI, Related Agency and Food and Drug Administration includes funding for the Department of Energy's Atomic Energy Defense Activities (Sec. 134) which supports nuclear weapons activities, and Sec. 130 applies the Defense Production Act to nuclear-related activities. Additionally, Division D includes military construction that may support nuclear infrastructure.

  • SECURE Minerals Act of 2026
    Rep. Wittman, Robert J. [R-VA-1] · confidence 0.85

    Section 202(b)(1)(B)(III) includes uranium as a material of interest designated by the Director of the Defense Logistics Agency, and Section 202(d)(1) excludes uranium from eligibility, but the bill's focus on critical minerals for defense and energy infrastructure strongly supports nuclear power indirectly.

  • Taiwan Energy Security and Anti-Embargo Act of 2026
    Sen. Ricketts, Pete [R-NE] · confidence 0.85

    Section 5 expresses sense of Congress that Taiwan should maintain nuclear power and utilize new nuclear technologies, and that the U.S. should prioritize assistance and cooperation on nuclear energy, which could benefit nuclear power plant operators and technology providers.

  • A bill to amend the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 to clarify ambiguous provisions and facilitate a more efficient, effective, and timely environmental review process, and for other purposes.
    Sen. Kennedy, John [R-LA] · confidence 0.85

    Section 2(g) amends NEPA to include 'energy,' in the Council's duties, which could facilitate timely reviews for nuclear power projects.

  • Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026
    Sen. Kennedy, John [R-LA] · confidence 0.85

    Title III includes $1,685,000,000 for Nuclear Energy activities, including transfers from prior acts, supporting nuclear power plant operations and research (see 'Nuclear Energy' section).

  • Establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2025 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2026 through 2034.
    Rep. Arrington, Jodey C. [R-TX-19] · confidence 0.80

    Title V, Section 5001(b)(2) policy to 'expand American energy production' includes nuclear power as part of domestic energy production.

  • Tradeable Energy Performance Standards Act
    Rep. Casten, Sean [D-IL-6] · confidence 0.80

    Nuclear power plants qualify as low-emission Covered Facilities (Sec. 701(13)) and would receive emission allowances under Sec. 703 that they could hold or sell, providing a financial benefit.

  • Reliable Power Act
    Rep. Balderson, Troy [R-OH-12] · confidence 0.80

    Section 2(g)(2)(A) includes analysis of generation resource mix, which could benefit nuclear power by ensuring its role in reliability is assessed in long-term planning.

  • State Planning for Reliability and Affordability Act
    Rep. Evans, Gabe [R-CO-8] · confidence 0.80

    Nuclear plants operate continuously for months with on-site fuel, satisfying the 30-day continuous generation and fuel availability criteria, making them likely to be classified as reliable generation facilities, thus benefiting nuclear.

  • To amend the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 to allow Federal agencies to rely on certain previously completed environmental assessments and environmental impact statements to satisfy the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, and for other purposes.
    Rep. Valadao, David G. [R-CA-22] · confidence 0.80

    Section 2(b) could ease NEPA review for nuclear power plant licensing or small modular reactor siting by permitting reuse of prior environmental impact statements for similar actions.

  • Energy Threat Analysis Center Act of 2026
    Rep. Castor, Kathy [D-FL-14] · confidence 0.80

    Section 2(1)(B) amends the program to enhance collaboration and threat mitigation for the energy sector, which includes nuclear power plants as part of the energy sector, thus providing them with cybersecurity operational support.

  • PARTNER with ASEAN, CERN, and PIF Act
    Sen. Risch, James E. [R-ID] · confidence 0.80

    Section 2(b) extends provisions of the International Organizations Immunities Act to the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), which could benefit the nuclear power industry by promoting international cooperation and research.

  • DOE and NSF Interagency Research Act
    Rep. Stevens, Haley M. [D-MI-11] · confidence 0.75

    Section 2(c)(1)(E) includes fusion science and energy and materials science, which supports nuclear power research, including fusion and advanced reactor concepts.

  • To terminate certain tariffs imposed pursuant to emergency authorities and require congressional approval for the imposition of similar tariffs, and for other purposes.
    Rep. Sánchez, Linda T. [D-CA-38] · confidence 0.75

    Section 2 terminates tariffs on steel and aluminum, which are used in nuclear plant construction and equipment; lower input costs benefit nuclear power developers and operators.

  • Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes on Imported Goods Act of 2025
    Sen. Shaheen, Jeanne [D-NH] · confidence 0.75

    Section 2(c)(1) prevents the President from imposing duties or tariff-rate quotas on imported articles, which could benefit nuclear power importers (e.g., uranium, fuel assemblies, reactor components) by avoiding tariffs on foreign nuclear materials.

  • Securing America’s Critical Minerals Supply Act
    Rep. James, John [R-MI-10] · confidence 0.70

    Nuclear power depends on critical minerals like uranium; Sec. 3(a)(1)(A)-(H) assessments and Sec. 3(a)(2)(B) increasing domestic production of critical energy resources benefit nuclear power.

  • PROFIT Act of 2026
    Rep. Kim, Young [R-CA-40] · confidence 0.70

    Sec. 9's focus on energy security and diplomacy, including critical minerals and supply chains, could support nuclear power as part of energy technology advancement.

  • Securing Reliable Power for Advanced Technologies Act
    Rep. Barr, Andy [R-KY-6] · confidence 0.70

    Subsection (a)(2)(B) defines dispatchable baseload electric generation facility with ≥100 MW capacity capable of firm service ≥85% of hours, not primarily from intermittent renewables, which could include nuclear plants, and subsection (h) provides financial assistance for such facilities serving AI infrastructure.

  • SPEED Act
    Rep. Westerman, Bruce [R-AR-4] · confidence 0.70

    Nuclear power projects (including SMRs) require extensive federal licensing and NEPA review. The bill's streamlining of environmental review processes, imposition of deadlines, and restriction on judicial review would reduce delays and costs associated with federal authorizations, providing a clear benefit to nuclear developers seeking federal permits or approvals.

  • Continuing Appropriations and Extensions and Other Matters Act, 2026
    Sen. Murray, Patty [D-WA] · confidence 0.70

    Section 133 increases funding for Atomic Energy Defense Activities--Weapons Activities from $118,056,000 to $149,244,000, benefiting nuclear power-related defense and research activities.

  • Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Act, 2026
    Sen. Hagerty, Bill [R-TN] · confidence 0.70

    Title I includes $42,000,000 available until September 30, 2027 for the Treasury-wide Financial Statement Audit and Internal Control Program, information technology modernization requirements, audit of Gulf Coast Restoration Trust Fund, development of cybersecurity programs, operations and maintenance of facilities, and international operations. Nuclear power plants may benefit from cybersecurity protections and financial oversight programs.

  • GRID Power Act
    Sen. Hoeven, John [R-ND] · confidence 0.70

    Nuclear power qualifies as dispatchable power under Section 2(3) (capable of known and forecastable supply), so it would benefit from prioritization in the interconnection queue under Section 3(a)(2)(A).

  • PIPES Act of 2025
    Rep. Graves, Sam [R-MO-6] · confidence 0.60

    Sec. 20 mandates a study on hydrogen-natural gas blending in existing pipeline systems, which could support hydrogen production (including via nuclear-powered electrolysis) as a clean energy carrier, indirectly benefiting nuclear power as a hydrogen source.

  • DOE and SBA Research Act
    Rep. LaLota, Nick [R-NY-1] · confidence 0.60

    DOE mission includes nuclear energy R&D; Section 2's collaborative activities could involve nuclear power research, benefiting industry via shared innovation.

  • Energy Security Pacts Act
    Sen. Coons, Christopher A. [D-DE] · confidence 0.60

    Section 5(d)(1)(C) mentions improved access to energy, which could benefit the nuclear power industry by promoting investment in low-carbon energy sources.

Bills that harm Nuclear Power

  • RESTRAIN Act
    Rep. Titus, Dina [D-NV-1] · confidence 0.90

    Section 2(a) prohibits explosive testing of nuclear weapons, which could limit research and development activities relevant to nuclear power technology and fuel cycle, imposing a cost on the nuclear power industry.

  • No Nuclear Testing Without Approval Act
    Rep. Horsford, Steven [D-NV-4] · confidence 0.90

    Section 2 amends the Atomic Energy Defense Act to require congressional approval before explosive nuclear testing may be resumed, imposing procedural hurdles and potential delays that could hinder nuclear weapons-related activities, which are closely tied to the nuclear power industry's research, development, and national security missions.

  • Ukraine Support Act
    Rep. Meeks, Gregory W. [D-NY-5] · confidence 0.85

    Section 306 imposes sanctions on foreign persons endangering the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant; Section 307 imposes sanctions on Rosatom and related nuclear transactions; Section 305 imposes sanctions on Crimea tunnel construction linked to Russian energy infrastructure.

  • Mining Waste, Fraud, and Abuse Prevention Act of 2025
    Sen. Luján, Ben Ray [D-NM] · confidence 0.85

    Uranium is a locatable mineral (Sec. 2(13)), and the bill subjects its production to royalties (Sec. 201) and reclamation fees (Sec. 402), increasing costs for nuclear fuel producers. Sec. 505 also mandates a review of uranium development, potentially leading to stricter regulations.

  • Downwinder Commemoration Act of 2025
    Rep. Vasquez, Gabe [D-NM-2] · confidence 0.80

    Section 2(a) mentions "detonations of the first atomic bomb" and "radioactive fallout", which could imply increased scrutiny or regulation of nuclear power, potentially harming the industry.

  • Reliable Power Act
    Sen. Cotton, Tom [R-AR] · confidence 0.70

    Section 2(h)(1)(A)(i) includes nuclear generation as a covered resource, meaning agency actions affecting nuclear power would be subject to FERC review and potential modification, imposing regulatory burden.

  • Sunshine for Regulatory Decrees and Settlements Act of 2025
    Rep. Cline, Ben [R-VA-6] · confidence 0.70

    Section 3(d) requires public comment and transparency for proposed consent decrees or settlement agreements, which could lead to increased scrutiny of regulatory actions affecting the nuclear power industry, as described in subsection (d)(2).