Energy Security Pacts Act
Download PDFSponsored by
Sen. Coons, Christopher A. [D-DE]
ID: C001088
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Committee on Foreign Relations. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
June 16, 2026
Introduced
Committee Review
Floor Action
📍 Current Status
Next: The full Senate will vote on whether to pass the bill.
Passed Senate
House Review
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the geniuses in Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Energy Security Pacts Act (S 4392) claims to promote United States and allied energy and mineral security. How quaint. In reality, it's a thinly veiled attempt to further entrench corporate interests, pad the pockets of politicians, and perpetuate the myth that our elected officials care about national security.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill establishes "Energy Security Pacts" – multiyear agreements with partner countries to enhance energy and economic security. Because, you know, we haven't tried that before and failed miserably. It also creates a new bureaucracy, the Energy Security Pacts Council, because what we really need is more bureaucratic red tape. Oh, and let's not forget the funding provisions, which allow for the transfer of funds from various agencies to support these pacts. Because who needs transparency or accountability when it comes to taxpayer dollars?
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects: energy corporations, mining companies, and their lobbyists. They'll be the primary beneficiaries of this bill, while the rest of us will be left to foot the bill. Partner countries will also be affected, but let's be real, they're just pawns in this game of global economic chess.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill has all the makings of a disaster. It'll likely lead to increased corporate influence over energy policy, further exploitation of natural resources, and a deeper entrenchment of crony capitalism. The environmental and health implications will be catastrophic, but hey, who needs clean air and water when there are profits to be made? And let's not forget the national security aspect – because nothing says "security" like propping up corrupt regimes and dictators with our tax dollars.
In conclusion, this bill is a symptom of a deeper disease: the corruption and greed that infects our political system. It's a classic case of legislative malpractice, where the symptoms (energy insecurity) are treated with more of the same poison (corporate handouts and bureaucratic bloat) that caused the problem in the first place. The diagnosis is clear: our politicians are suffering from a severe case of moral bankruptcy, and the prognosis is grim.
Related Topics
💰 Campaign Finance Network
Sen. Coons, Christopher A. [D-DE]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance
This bill has 3 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
Sen. Ricketts, Pete [R-NE]
ID: R000618
Top Contributors
10
Sen. Hickenlooper, John W. [D-CO]
ID: H000273
Top Contributors
10
Sen. Curtis, John R. [R-UT]
ID: C001114
Top Contributors
10
Donor Network - Sen. Coons, Christopher A. [D-DE]
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 27 nodes and 31 connections
Total contributions: $110,700
Top Donors - Sen. Coons, Christopher A. [D-DE]
Showing top 16 donors by contribution amount
Industry Impact
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 4 helped,1 harmed.
- +Oil & Gas confidence 0.80
Section 3(a) mentions efforts to enhance energy security and stability, which could benefit the oil and gas industry by promoting diversification of critical mineral and energy supply chains.
- +Renewable Energy confidence 0.80
Section 5(a) aims to increase reliable access to energy, including for production of critical minerals, which could benefit the renewable energy industry by promoting investment in clean energy sources.
- +Pipelines & Energy Infrastructure confidence 0.70
Section 3(c)(2) mentions grants to build administrative or technical capacity for Energy Security Pacts, which could benefit the energy infrastructure industry by supporting development of new energy projects.
- −Coal Mining confidence 0.60
Section 5(d)(1)(C) mentions improved access to energy and economic growth, which could potentially harm the coal mining industry if it leads to a shift away from fossil fuels.
- +Nuclear Power confidence 0.60
Section 5(d)(1)(C) mentions improved access to energy, which could benefit the nuclear power industry by promoting investment in low-carbon energy sources.
Who funds the sponsor on these industries
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Sen. Coons, Christopher A. [D-DE]) received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.
Industries this bill HELPS
- Nuclear Power$100from 1contribution
- LYKE, AUDREY$100
- Oil & Gas$50from 1contribution
- HALLIBURTON, JANE$50
Project 2025 Policy Matches
This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document. AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.
Introduction
AI Analysis:
"The Energy Security Pacts Act strongly aligns with the Project 2025 policy by promoting U.S. energy security interests, diversifying supply chains, and advancing economic interests, all of which are central to the policy's objectives. The act's focus on enhancing energy security through strategic partnerships and considering environmental and social factors also resonates with the policy's emphasis on protecting U.S. global energy and economic interests."
— 389 — Department of Energy and Related Commissions policy and how it affects foreign policy, as well as the international energy landscape and how it affects U.S. national and economic security. l Develop a strategy for identifying and accessing resources and advancing U.S. economic interests. America has recently become a net energy exporter, but it still imports large amounts of essential energy resources such as oil and natural gas as well as such materials as uranium (including yellowcake), lithium, certain rare earth minerals, and energy generation and transmission components and technology. The United States needs a clear understanding of its global energy and economic interests and a strategy for protecting them. l Oppose “climate reparations.” During the November 2022 United Nations climate conference in Egypt, the Biden Administration and other “developed” countries agreed to provide “climate reparations” to developing countries for the harm allegedly caused by the developed countries’ use of fossil fuel.76 A reparations slush fund administered by a non-U.S. organization provides no assurance that U.S. interests will be protected and should not be supported in any form. New Policies l Identify U.S. energy security interests and promote American energy dominance. To this end, IA should work closely with the DESAS Office of Policy on the National Energy Security Strategy. l Strengthen the new DESAS vis-à-vis the Department of State. The State Department’s Bureau of Energy Resources has generally excluded IA from serious discussions of international affairs to the detriment of DOE and broader interagency policy development. In addition, DOE embassy representatives are generally excluded from giving policy advice to senior diplomats and are used merely as sources of information instead of being active advocates for the Secretary’s priorities. The Secretary of Energy is a senior member of the President’s National Security Council and should function as such. The DOE’s Deputy Secretaries, Under Secretaries, and Assistant Secretaries should be guaranteed representation at all Deputies and Policy Coordination Committee meetings. In addition, senior political and career staff should hold positions on the NSC staff equivalent to their counterparts at State, Defense, Treasury, and the Intelligence Community (IC). DESAS billets should replace State Department Bureau of Energy Resources billets at the relevant posts worldwide.
Introduction
AI Analysis:
"The Energy Security Pacts Act strongly aligns with the Project 2025 policy by promoting U.S. energy security interests, diversifying supply chains, and advancing economic interests, all of which are central to the policy's objectives. The act's focus on enhancing energy security, countering economic coercion, and developing strategic partnerships directly supports key aspects of the Project 2025 policy."
— 389 — Department of Energy and Related Commissions policy and how it affects foreign policy, as well as the international energy landscape and how it affects U.S. national and economic security. l Develop a strategy for identifying and accessing resources and advancing U.S. economic interests. America has recently become a net energy exporter, but it still imports large amounts of essential energy resources such as oil and natural gas as well as such materials as uranium (including yellowcake), lithium, certain rare earth minerals, and energy generation and transmission components and technology. The United States needs a clear understanding of its global energy and economic interests and a strategy for protecting them. l Oppose “climate reparations.” During the November 2022 United Nations climate conference in Egypt, the Biden Administration and other “developed” countries agreed to provide “climate reparations” to developing countries for the harm allegedly caused by the developed countries’ use of fossil fuel.76 A reparations slush fund administered by a non-U.S. organization provides no assurance that U.S. interests will be protected and should not be supported in any form. New Policies l Identify U.S. energy security interests and promote American energy dominance. To this end, IA should work closely with the DESAS Office of Policy on the National Energy Security Strategy. l Strengthen the new DESAS vis-à-vis the Department of State. The State Department’s Bureau of Energy Resources has generally excluded IA from serious discussions of international affairs to the detriment of DOE and broader interagency policy development. In addition, DOE embassy representatives are generally excluded from giving policy advice to senior diplomats and are used merely as sources of information instead of being active advocates for the Secretary’s priorities. The Secretary of Energy is a senior member of the President’s National Security Council and should function as such. The DOE’s Deputy Secretaries, Under Secretaries, and Assistant Secretaries should be guaranteed representation at all Deputies and Policy Coordination Committee meetings. In addition, senior political and career staff should hold positions on the NSC staff equivalent to their counterparts at State, Defense, Treasury, and the Intelligence Community (IC). DESAS billets should replace State Department Bureau of Energy Resources billets at the relevant posts worldwide. — 390 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l Stop “climate reparations.” The President should refuse to provide climate reparations under an unratified treaty, and IA should encourage other countries to reconsider their desire to provide reparations. ARCTIC ENERGY OFFICE (AE) Mission/Overview AE was established during the Trump Administration to create a central office overseeing U.S. Arctic interests in Alaska and the other Arctic nations in response to the growing strategic sensitivity of this geographic region and the natural resources it contains. It “serves as the principal advisor to the Under Secretary on all domestic Arctic issues, including energy, science, and national security.”77 Needed Reforms In October 2022, the Biden Administration released its National Strategy for the Arctic Region.78 Although recognizing national security threats in the Arctic, it also focuses heavily on climate change, sustainability, and international cooperation. The United States must establish a strategic plan to promote its national security, energy, and economic interests in the Arctic. An analysis and plan to support the responsible development of Alaska’s energy assets should be a priority. New Policies l Defend American interests in the Arctic Circle. The next Administration needs to define American strategic and economic interests in the Arctic Circle. AE should help to identify those interests, as well as threats posed by countries like Russia and China, and develop appropriate policy options for the President’s consideration. l Ensure that AE is clearly focused. In particular, this means identifying U.S. energy interests in the Arctic Circle, identifying foreign government and commercial interests and activity in the region, and ensuring that the United States does not forgo important energy and national security interests in the Arctic. l Expand AE’s operations in Alaska. AE’s operations in Alaska should be expanded to encompass broader national energy security interests in the region including rare earths, oil, and natural gas. AE should also be the lead for DOE Antarctic operations as a counter to growing Russian and Chinese interest in Antarctic resources.
Introduction
AI Analysis:
"The bill's focus on energy security and promoting U.S. energy resources aligns somewhat with Project 2025's objectives, but the bill's emphasis on government intervention and bureaucratic expansion contradicts the project's goal of ending government interference in energy decisions. The alignment is therefore weak."
— 365 — Department of Energy and Related Commissions l Support repeal of massive spending bills like the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA)3 and Inflation Reduction Act (IRA),4 which established new programs and are providing hundreds of billions of dollars in subsidies to renewable energy developers, their investors, and special interests, and support the rescinding of all funds not already spent by these programs. l Unleash private-sector energy innovation by ending government interference in energy decisions. l Stop the war on oil and natural gas. l Allow individuals, families, and business to use the energy resources they want to use and that will best serve their needs. l Secure and protect energy infrastructure from cyber and physical attacks. l Refocus the Department of Energy on energy security, accelerated remediation, and advanced science. l Promote U.S. energy resources as a means to assist our allies and diminish our strategic adversaries. l Refocus FERC on ensuring that customers have affordable and reliable electricity, natural gas, and oil and no longer allow it to favor special interests and progressive causes. l Ensure that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission facilitates rather than hampers private-sector nuclear energy innovation and deployment. American Science Dominance. Ever since the age of Benjamin Franklin, the United States has been at the forefront of scientific discovery and technological advancement. Beginning with the groundbreaking science of the Manhattan Proj- ect, the U.S. has developed 17 National Laboratories that conduct fundamental and advanced scientific research. The National Labs have been critical in supporting national defense and ensuring that the United States leads on scientific discoveries with transformative applications that benefit America and the world. In recent years, however, U.S. science has been under threat. Externally, adversaries like the Chinese military have been engaged in scientific espionage, infiltrating taxpayer-funded scientific research projects, and funding their own science research. In addition, the National Labs have been too focused on climate change and renewable technologies.
Showing 3 of 5 policy matches
About These Correlations
Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.
Related Bills
Other Bills by Sen. Coons, Christopher A.
Similar Topics
Tradeable Energy Performance Standards Act
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating to "Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Walk-In Coolers and Walk-In Freezers".
CORE Act of 2025