The bill
Energy Threat Analysis Center Act of 2026
HR. 7305, 119th Congress โ read as touching Pipelines & Energy Infrastructure.
Sponsored by
Rep. Castor, Kathy [D-FL-14]
ID: C001066
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 7305, 119th Congress โ read as touching Pipelines & Energy Infrastructure.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
23 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
The alignment
This bill's text tracks the "Introduction" section, p. 398-400 of the Mandate for Leadership.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
July 12, 2026
๐ Current Status
Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. The Energy Threat Analysis Center Act of 2026 - because what's more threatening than a bunch of bureaucrats trying to sound smart about cybersecurity?
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** Oh boy, this one's a doozy. The bill claims to "strengthen the collective defense, response, and resilience of the United States energy sector" by creating an Energy Threat Analysis Center. Wow, that sounds like a real thing that will definitely happen. I'm sure it has nothing to do with funneling more money to cronies in the energy industry or expanding the surveillance state.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (because who needs infrastructure when you can have cybersecurity theater?) to reauthorize the Department of Energy's Energy Sector Operational Support for Cyberresilience Program. It also establishes an Energy Threat Analysis Center, which will be a hub for "advanced analytics and experimentation" - code for "we're going to collect all your data and pretend it's for national security." The bill also conveniently exempts itself from the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) and Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), because transparency is overrated.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The energy sector, government agencies, private organizations, and persons (whatever that means). In other words, everyone who can be exploited for profit or control. The bill's "stakeholders" will likely include the usual suspects: fossil fuel companies, defense contractors, and cybersecurity firms looking to cash in on the latest boogeyman.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a symptom of a deeper disease - the perpetual quest for power and profit at the expense of civil liberties and common sense. It will likely lead to more surveillance, more cronyism, and more wasteful spending on "cybersecurity" initiatives that do little to address actual threats. The real impact will be felt by the American people, who will be subjected to more propaganda about the dangers of cyber threats and the need for greater government control over their lives.
In conclusion, this bill is a farce, a sham, a Potemkin village of cybersecurity theater designed to distract from the real issues facing our country. It's a testament to the boundless stupidity and cynicism of our elected officials, who think they can fool us with empty rhetoric and bureaucratic jargon. Newsflash: we're not buying it.
Rep. Castor, Kathy [D-FL-14]
Congress 119 โข 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 1 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: E000300
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 45 nodes and 26 connections (47 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $91,325
Showing top 19 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 6 helped.
Section 2(1)(B) amends the Energy Sector Operational Support for Cyberresilience Program to strengthen collective defense, response, and resilience of the U.S. energy sector, including enhancing collaboration between government and energy sector to analyze threats and mitigate operational impacts to energy systems, which benefits energy infrastructure operators such as pipelines, midstream operators, and LNG export terminals.
Section 2(1)(B) amends the program to enhance collaboration and threat mitigation for the energy sector, which includes electric utilities that distribute power to consumers, providing them with operational support for cybersecurity and resilience.
Section 2(1)(B) amends the program to strengthen the collective defense and resilience of the U.S. energy sector, which includes renewable energy generation (solar, wind, geothermal, hydro) as part of the energy sector, thus providing them with cybersecurity operational support.
Section 2(1)(B) amends the program to enhance collaboration and threat mitigation for the energy sector, which includes nuclear power plants as part of the energy sector, thus providing them with cybersecurity operational support.
Section 2(1)(B) amends the program to strengthen the collective defense and resilience of the U.S. energy sector, which includes coal extraction and processing as part of the energy sector, thus providing them with cybersecurity operational support.
Section 2(1)(B) amends the program to enhance collaboration and threat mitigation for the energy sector, which includes crude oil and natural gas extraction, refining, and exploration as part of the energy sector, thus providing them with cybersecurity operational support.
This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.
โ 365 โ Department of Energy and Related Commissions l Support repeal of massive spending bills like the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA)3 and Inflation Reduction Act (IRA),4 which established new programs and are providing hundreds of billions of dollars in subsidies to renewable energy developers, their investors, and special interests, and support the rescinding of all funds not already spent by these programs. l Unleash private-sector energy innovation by ending government interference in energy decisions. l Stop the war on oil and natural gas. l Allow individuals, families, and business to use the energy resources they want to use and that will best serve their needs. l Secure and protect energy infrastructure from cyber and physical attacks. l Refocus the Department of Energy on energy security, accelerated remediation, and advanced science. l Promote U.S. energy resources as a means to assist our allies and diminish our strategic adversaries. l Refocus FERC on ensuring that customers have affordable and reliable electricity, natural gas, and oil and no longer allow it to favor special interests and progressive causes. l Ensure that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission facilitates rather than hampers private-sector nuclear energy innovation and deployment. American Science Dominance. Ever since the age of Benjamin Franklin, the United States has been at the forefront of scientific discovery and technological advancement. Beginning with the groundbreaking science of the Manhattan Proj- ect, the U.S. has developed 17 National Laboratories that conduct fundamental and advanced scientific research. The National Labs have been critical in supporting national defense and ensuring that the United States leads on scientific discoveries with transformative applications that benefit America and the world. In recent years, however, U.S. science has been under threat. Externally, adversaries like the Chinese military have been engaged in scientific espionage, infiltrating taxpayer-funded scientific research projects, and funding their own science research. In addition, the National Labs have been too focused on climate change and renewable technologies.
โ 365 โ Department of Energy and Related Commissions l Support repeal of massive spending bills like the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA)3 and Inflation Reduction Act (IRA),4 which established new programs and are providing hundreds of billions of dollars in subsidies to renewable energy developers, their investors, and special interests, and support the rescinding of all funds not already spent by these programs. l Unleash private-sector energy innovation by ending government interference in energy decisions. l Stop the war on oil and natural gas. l Allow individuals, families, and business to use the energy resources they want to use and that will best serve their needs. l Secure and protect energy infrastructure from cyber and physical attacks. l Refocus the Department of Energy on energy security, accelerated remediation, and advanced science. l Promote U.S. energy resources as a means to assist our allies and diminish our strategic adversaries. l Refocus FERC on ensuring that customers have affordable and reliable electricity, natural gas, and oil and no longer allow it to favor special interests and progressive causes. l Ensure that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission facilitates rather than hampers private-sector nuclear energy innovation and deployment. American Science Dominance. Ever since the age of Benjamin Franklin, the United States has been at the forefront of scientific discovery and technological advancement. Beginning with the groundbreaking science of the Manhattan Proj- ect, the U.S. has developed 17 National Laboratories that conduct fundamental and advanced scientific research. The National Labs have been critical in supporting national defense and ensuring that the United States leads on scientific discoveries with transformative applications that benefit America and the world. In recent years, however, U.S. science has been under threat. Externally, adversaries like the Chinese military have been engaged in scientific espionage, infiltrating taxpayer-funded scientific research projects, and funding their own science research. In addition, the National Labs have been too focused on climate change and renewable technologies. โ 366 โ Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise American science dominance is critical to U.S. national security and economic strength. The next conservative President therefore needs to recommit the United States to ensuring this dominance. MISSION STATEMENT FOR A REFORMED DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY The Department of Energy should be renamed and refocused as the Department of Energy Security and Advanced Science (DESAS). DESAS would refocus on DOEโs five existing core missions: l Providing leadership and coordination on energy security and related national security issues, l Promoting U.S. energy economic interests abroad, l Leading the nation and the world in cutting-edge fundamental advanced science, l Remediating former Manhattan Project and Cold War nuclear material sites, and l Developing new nuclear weapons and naval nuclear reactors. These missions work together by using advanced science to promote national security while getting the government out of the business of picking winners and losers in energy resources. Reform is needed because DOE, instead of focusing on core energy and security issues, has been spending billions of taxpayer dollars to subsidize renewable energy developers and investors, thereby making Americans less energy secure and distorting energy markets. OVERVIEW DOE was created by the Department of Energy Organization Act of 19775 in response to the 1970s oil crisis, consolidating various energy programs that pre- viously had operated without coordination throughout the federal government in a single department. In addition to addressing energy issues, DOE is tasked with: l Engaging in basic and fundamental science and research through the 17 National Laboratories; l Cleaning up the Manhattan Project and Cold War nuclear material and weapons sites;
Policy matches are calculated using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text. A score of 60% or higher indicates meaningful thematic overlap. This does not imply direct causation or intent, but highlights areas where legislation aligns with Project 2025 policy objectives.