Ukraine Support Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/2913
Last Updated: September 7, 2026

Sponsored by

Rep. Meeks, Gregory W. [D-NY-5]

ID: M001137

Follow the money

The bill

Ukraine Support Act

HR. 2913, 119th Congress — read as touching Defense Contractors.

The sponsor

Rep. Meeks, Gregory W. [D-NY-5]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$80,100 raised

23 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

95% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of State" section, p. 214-216 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 462.

July 19, 2026

Introduced

Committee Review

Floor Action

Passed House

Senate Review

📍 Current Status

Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the geniuses in Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Ukraine Support Act (HR 2913) is a grandiose attempt to appear tough on Russia while lining the pockets of defense contractors and perpetuating the myth of American exceptionalism. Its primary objective is to provide a veneer of legitimacy for continued military interventionism, sanctions, and saber-rattling.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** This bill is a laundry list of platitudes, empty condemnations, and token gestures. It "condemns" Russian aggression (how brave), "reaffirms" support for Ukraine (yawn), and "urges" the withdrawal of Russian forces (good luck with that). The actual provisions are a mix of:

* Lend-lease authority: because what's a war without some good old-fashioned arms dealing? * Sanctions on Russian financial institutions, oil, and mining industries: because crippling their economy will totally make them surrender * Support for Baltic countries: because someone has to keep the NATO gravy train rolling * Establishment of a Ukraine Reconstruction Trust Fund: because who doesn't love a good slush fund?

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects:

* Ukrainian people: used as pawns in a geopolitical game, their suffering and resilience exploited for propaganda purposes * Russian Federation: the designated villain, because someone has to play the role of "evil empire" * Defense contractors: the real beneficiaries of this bill, as they'll be lining up to provide "support" and "aid" to Ukraine (read: sell them overpriced weapons) * NATO and EU: getting a boost to their relevance and funding, courtesy of American taxpayers

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill will:

* Further escalate tensions with Russia, because what's a cold war without some good old-fashioned brinksmanship? * Line the pockets of defense contractors and politicians with ties to the military-industrial complex * Provide a fig leaf for continued American interventionism in Ukraine, under the guise of "supporting democracy" and "defending sovereignty" * Achieve precisely nothing in terms of actually resolving the conflict or improving the lives of Ukrainian people

In conclusion, HR 2913 is a masterclass in legislative cynicism, a perfect example of how to create a bill that sounds good on paper but accomplishes nothing meaningful. It's a testament to the boundless stupidity and corruption of our political class, who will stop at nothing to perpetuate their own power and interests, even if it means sacrificing the well-being of entire nations. Bravo, Congress. Bravo.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Meeks, Gregory W. [D-NY-5]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$80,100
21 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$9,100
Committees
$0
Individuals
$71,000

No PAC contributions found

1
AK-CHIN INDIAN COMMUNITY
2 transactions
$5,800
2
AGUA CALIENTE BAN OF CAHUILLA INDIANS
1 transaction
$3,300

No committee contributions found

1
CROWN, LESTER
1 transaction
$6,600
2
ARMSTRONG, BRIAN
2 transactions
$6,600
3
LIPPMAN, MARIE C.
1 transaction
$5,000
4
CUKIERMAN, JORAM
1 transaction
$3,300
5
SILVERMAN, DOUG
1 transaction
$3,300
6
SHAMAH, ALAN
1 transaction
$3,300
7
SHAMAH, JOSEPH
1 transaction
$3,300
8
FRIEDMAN, AVI
1 transaction
$3,300
9
HARMALA, ROBERT
1 transaction
$3,300
10
MINSKOFF, EDWARD J.
1 transaction
$3,300
11
POLLACK, BRUCE
1 transaction
$3,300
12
FOOKSMAN, EUGENE
1 transaction
$3,300
13
TISCH, JONATHAN
1 transaction
$3,300
14
ZEEV, OREN
1 transaction
$3,300
15
PITTMAN, ALVIN L.
1 transaction
$3,300
16
RADOW, LINDA
1 transaction
$3,300
17
RADOW, NORMAN
1 transaction
$3,300
18
WEINBERG, DEBRA
1 transaction
$3,300
19
RUSH, STEPHEN
1 transaction
$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Hoyer, Steny H. [D-MD-5]

ID: H000874

Top Contributors

20

1
MACEIRA, ANTHONY
INSIGHT LLC • PRESIDENT
IndividualGUAYNABO, PR
$11,600
May 3, 2024
2
SHAH, VINOD K.
MEDSTAR SHAH ASSOCIATES • PHYSICIAN
IndividualMECHANICSVILLE, MD
$11,600
Apr 18, 2024
3
PARRIS, LAURIE A.
N/A • HOMEMAKER
IndividualCOLTONS POINT, MD
$8,300
Apr 25, 2024
4
GUILLEMARD-NOBLE, ANDRES M.
NACHMAN & GUILLEMARD • ATTORNEY
IndividualSAN JUAN, PR
$8,300
May 3, 2024
5
ORTIZ, MANUEL
VANTAGEKNIGHT INC • ATTORNEY
IndividualCHEVY CHASE, MD
$8,300
May 4, 2024
6
BILDMAN, STEVE J.
N/A • RETIRED
IndividualATLANTIC BEACH, FL
$8,300
Apr 18, 2024
7
ORTIZ, MANUEL
VANTAGEKNIGHT, LLC • ATTORNEY
IndividualCHEVY CHASE, MD
$8,300
May 11, 2023
8
GUILLEMARD-NOBLE, ANDRES M.
GUILLEMARD LAW • ATTORNEY
IndividualSAN JUAN, PR
$8,300
May 11, 2023
9
GEPHARDT, RICHARD A.
GEPHARDT GROUP • CONSULTANT
IndividualNAPLES, FL
$6,600
Sep 23, 2024
10
SHAH, ANIL K.
MEDSTAR SHAH ASSOCIATES • PHYSICIAN
IndividualLEONARDTOWN, MD
$6,600
Apr 18, 2024

Rep. Connolly, Gerald E. [D-VA-11]

ID: C001078

Top Contributors

22

1
FOR SENATE, MARSDEN
MARSDEN FOR SENATE COMMITTEE • SENATOR
COMBURKE, VA
$250
Mar 19, 2024
2
HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP
OrganizationRICHMOND, VA
$2,900
Jun 22, 2023
3
HERSHMAN, MICHAEL J.
THE FAIRFAX GROUP • PRESIDENT
IndividualDELRAY BEACH, FL
$3,300
Dec 24, 2024
4
TRONE, DAVID
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES • REPRESENTATIVE
IndividualPOTOMAC, MD
$3,300
Dec 9, 2024
5
MISENER, PAUL E
SELF-EMPLOYED • LAWYER
IndividualGREAT FALLS, VA
$3,300
Sep 21, 2023
6
PUNARO, ARNOLD
PUNARO GROUP • CONSULTANT
IndividualMCLEAN, VA
$3,300
Jul 25, 2023
7
PUNARO, ARNOLD
PUNARO GROUP • CONSULTANT
IndividualMCLEAN, VA
$3,300
Jul 25, 2023
8
PUNARO, JULIA
RETIRED • NONE
IndividualMCLEAN, VA
$3,300
Jul 25, 2023
9
PUNARO, JULIA
RETIRED • NONE
IndividualMCLEAN, VA
$3,300
Jul 25, 2023
10
RABAUT, TOM W
NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED
IndividualGREAT FALLS, VA
$3,300
Sep 27, 2023

Rep. Doggett, Lloyd [D-TX-37]

ID: D000399

Top Contributors

21

1
ALABAMA-COUSHATTA TRIBE OF TEXAS
OrganizationLIVINGSTON, TX
$1,000
Oct 1, 2024
2
DENNISON, ROBERT A. III
SELF-EMPLOYED • ATTORNEY
IndividualAUSTIN, TX
$3,300
Jun 28, 2024
3
WEBER, THOMAS M
MCELROY, SULLIVAN, MILLER, & WEBER LLP • ATTORNEY
IndividualWEST LAKE HILLS, TX
$3,300
Apr 19, 2024
4
CONYNGHAM, JIM
N/A • NOT EMPLOYED
IndividualAUSTIN, TX
$3,300
Jun 28, 2024
5
BARNES, BEN F.
BEN BARNES GROUP • CONSULTANT
IndividualAUSTIN, TX
$3,300
Apr 24, 2024
6
LOOK JAMESON, MARION
N/A • RETIRED
IndividualAUSTIN, TX
$3,300
Sep 1, 2023
7
MOK, AMY WONG
ASIAN AMERICAN CULTURAL CENTER • EDUCATION
IndividualAUSTIN, TX
$3,300
Aug 29, 2023
8
LINEBARGER, DALE
N/A • RETIRED
IndividualAUSTIN, TX
$3,300
Sep 18, 2023
9
VARNEY, LANA K.
KING & SPALDING • ATTORNEY
IndividualAUSTIN, TX
$3,300
Sep 17, 2023
10
YANCY, HOWARD CHARLES
ZYDECO DEVELOPMENT • REAL ESTATE DEVELOPER
IndividualAUSTIN, TX
$3,300
Aug 28, 2023

Rep. Keating, William R. [D-MA-9]

ID: K000375

Top Contributors

20

1
EPPERLY, MATTHEW THOMAS
CHARTWELL STRATEGY GROUP • MANAGING DIRECTOR
IndividualBETHESDA, MD
$3,300
Mar 30, 2023
2
WORLEY, RICHARD
NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED
IndividualEDGARTOWN, MA
$3,300
Feb 19, 2024
3
MCCANN, WILLIAM J.
STRATEGIC MARKETING INNOVATIONS • CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
IndividualARLINGTON, VA
$3,300
May 10, 2023
4
FISH, JOHN F.
SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION • CEO
IndividualBOSTON, MA
$3,300
Jun 28, 2024
5
MCCARTNEY, CHRISTINE B.
NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED
IndividualOSTERVILLE, MA
$3,300
Jun 6, 2024
6
MCCLENNEN, JAMES C.
WEQUASSETT RESORT AND GOLF CLUB • PARTNER
IndividualHARWICH, MA
$3,300
Aug 12, 2024
7
ABRAHAM, ANDREW
KECHES • LAWYER
IndividualMILTON, MA
$3,300
Sep 26, 2023
8
FLAHERTY, SEAN C.
KECHES LAW GROUP • ATTORNEY
IndividualBRIDGEWATER, MA
$3,300
Sep 26, 2023
9
GREEN, LAWRENCE ALAN
RENTALS UNLIMITED • CEO
IndividualNANTUCKET, MA
$3,300
Jul 24, 2023
10
LEITER, DAVID J.
PLURUS STRATEGIES LLC • CONSULTANT
IndividualWASHINGTON, DC
$3,300
Sep 28, 2023

Rep. Dean, Madeleine [D-PA-4]

ID: D000631

Top Contributors

20

1
LEVIN, CARYL
NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED
IndividualELKINS PARK, PA
$5,000
Nov 3, 2024
2
LINDY, ALAN
LINDY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT • PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
IndividualAMBLER, PA
$3,500
Oct 28, 2024
3
BECKER, DEBBIE M
NOT EMPLOYED • RETIRED
IndividualWYNNEWOOD, PA
$3,300
Nov 4, 2024
4
BECKER, WILLIAM P.
BECKER & FRONDORF • RETIRED
IndividualWYNNEWOOD, PA
$3,300
Nov 4, 2024
5
KRAUSZ, STEVEN
US VENTURE PARTNERS • VENTURE CAPITAL
IndividualPORTOLA VALLEY, CA
$3,300
Oct 23, 2024
6
ERICKSEN, EUGENE P
SELF • STATISTICIAN
IndividualPHILADELPHIA, PA
$3,300
Jul 1, 2023
7
FINK, WILLIAM
SELF • CPA
IndividualDOWNINGTOWN, PA
$3,300
Aug 4, 2023
8
LINDY, FRANK
LINDY COMMUNITIES • REAL ESTATE
IndividualELKINS PARK, PA
$3,300
Jul 25, 2023
9
MILLER, LESLIE ANNE ESQ.
SELF EMPLOYED • ATTORNEY
IndividualBRYN MAWR, PA
$3,300
Aug 24, 2023
10
SCATTONE, FRANCESCO
RENAISSANCE TECHNOLOGIES • FINANCE
IndividualWYNDMOOR, PA
$3,300
Jul 27, 2023

Rep. Landsman, Greg [D-OH-1]

ID: L000601

Top Contributors

23

1
CHEROKEE NATION
OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK
$1,000
Dec 1, 2023
2
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationLOS ANGELES, CA
$1,000
Mar 19, 2024
3
CHEROKEE NATION
OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK
$1,000
Sep 30, 2024
4
SOSNICK, AARON
IndividualRENO, NV
$3,392
Jun 30, 2024
5
FISHER, CYNTHIA
PATIENTRIGHTSADVOCATE.ORG • FOUNDER AND CHAIRMAN
IndividualPALM BEACH, FL
$3,300
Oct 22, 2024
6
HIRSCHTICK, JON
PTC • MANAGER
IndividualLEXINGTON, MA
$3,300
Oct 29, 2024
7
PFAUTCH, ROY
SELF EMPLOYED • GOVERNMENT RELATIONS
IndividualSAINT LOUIS, MO
$3,300
Oct 21, 2024
8
TISCH, JONATHAN
LOEWS HOTELS • EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$3,300
Oct 21, 2024
9
TISCH, LIZZIE
LTD X LIZZIE TISCH • CHIEF CURATOR
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$3,300
Oct 22, 2024
10
BEEUWKES, REINIER
NOT EMPLOYED • RETIRED
IndividualCONCORD, MA
$3,300
Nov 7, 2023

Rep. Carter, Troy A. [D-LA-2]

ID: C001125

Top Contributors

31

1
TUNICA-BILOXI TRIBE OF LOUISIANA
OrganizationMARKSVILLE, LA
$3,400
Nov 25, 2024
2
TUNICA-BILOXI TRIBE OF LOUISIANA
OrganizationMARKSVILLE, LA
$3,400
Jun 20, 2023
3
AK-CHIN INDIAN COMMUNITY
OrganizationMARICOPA, AZ
$3,300
Mar 30, 2023
4
SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA
$3,300
Feb 28, 2024
5
TUNICA-BILOXI TRIBE OF LOUISIANA
OrganizationMARKSVILLE, LA
$3,300
Jun 20, 2023
6
TUNICA-BILOXI TRIBE OF LOUISIANA
OrganizationMARKSVILLE, LA
$3,300
Jun 20, 2023
7
AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS GENERAL FUND
OrganizationPALM SPRINGS, CA
$3,300
Jun 30, 2023
8
AK-CHIN INDIAN COMMUNITY
OrganizationMARICOPA, AZ
$2,500
Jul 30, 2024
9
THE AUGUST GROUP
OrganizationBATON ROUGE, LA
$1,000
Jul 18, 2024
10
CAPITELLI & WICKER
OrganizationNEW ORLEANS, LA
$1,000
Mar 26, 2024

Rep. Swalwell, Eric [D-CA-14]

ID: S001193

Top Contributors

23

1
HOLDING LLC, M13
NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED
OrganizationWEST HOLLYWOOD, CA
$1,650
Mar 31, 2023
2
SYCUAN BAND OF THE KUMEYAAY NATION
OrganizationEL CAJON, CA
$1,000
Oct 21, 2024
3
DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION PAC
OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC
$1,000
Aug 9, 2024
4
JORDAN, WAYNE D.
JORDAN REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS • PRESIDENT/CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
IndividualOAKLAND, CA
$6,600
Jun 24, 2023
5
DURST, DOUGLAS
ROYAL REALTY • REAL ESTATE
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$6,000
Aug 23, 2023
6
FASS, DANIEL
IndividualPRINCETON, NJ
$5,300
Oct 16, 2024
7
ANDERSON, KIMBALL
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP • ATTORNEY
IndividualCHICAGO, IL
$4,200
Oct 24, 2023
8
KEHALY, WILLIAM
SNOW SUMMIT LLC • SKI PATROLLER
IndividualLAS VEGAS, NV
$4,200
Feb 21, 2023
9
KEHALY, WILLIAM
IndividualLAS VEGAS, NV
$4,200
Mar 2, 2023
10
ALPERT, HERB
SELF EMPLOYED • MUSICIAN
IndividualSANTA MONICA, CA
$3,700
Jan 30, 2024

Rep. Johnson, Julie [D-TX-32]

ID: J000310

Top Contributors

21

1
HPUL PROJECT OPERATIONS
OrganizationUPPER LAKE, CA
$3,300
Dec 31, 2023
2
HILL, DERRALL
NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED
IndividualDALLAS, TX
$6,600
Nov 30, 2023
3
PACK, TONY
SAM PACK AUTOMOTIVE • VICE PRESIDENT
IndividualSOUTHLAKE, TX
$6,600
Dec 28, 2023
4
BLACK, ALBERT
ON-TARGET SUPPLIES & LOGISTICS • EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN
IndividualDALLAS, TX
$6,600
Jan 5, 2024
5
SEDIGHI, HOOMAN
SELF-EMPLOYED • PHYSICIAN
IndividualFARMERS BRANCH, TX
$6,600
Jan 23, 2024
6
STEINGLASS, DAVID
AMERICAN CAPITAL • FINANCE
IndividualWASHINGTON, DC
$6,600
Feb 12, 2024
7
STEINGLASS, ELIZABETH
NOT EMPLOYED • RETIRED
IndividualWASHINGTON, DC
$6,600
Jan 30, 2024
8
BURNS, DEIADRA
UDR INC. • CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
IndividualDALLAS, TX
$6,600
Jun 19, 2023
9
COX, MORGAN
MARQUIS GROUP • REAL ESTATE INVESTOR
IndividualDALLAS, TX
$6,600
Jun 19, 2023
10
FREY, DANIEL
NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED
IndividualCOPPELL, TX
$6,600
Jun 23, 2023

Rep. Kennedy, Timothy M. [D-NY-26]

ID: K000402

Top Contributors

22

1
SENECA NATION OF INDIANS
OrganizationSALAMANCA, NY
$3,300
Apr 16, 2024
2
SENECA NATION OF INDIANS
OrganizationSALAMANCA, NY
$3,300
Jan 25, 2024
3
O'BRIEN, CHRISTOPHER
NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED
IndividualBUFFALO, NY
$5,000
Oct 29, 2024
4
RECHLER, SCOTT H.
RXR REALTY, LLC • CHAIRMAN
IndividualUNIONDALE, NY
$5,000
Jun 17, 2024
5
FROMEN, JOHN J. JR
SELF EMPLOYED • ATTORNEY
IndividualBUFFALO, NY
$5,000
Aug 8, 2024
6
RECHLER, SCOTT H.
IndividualUNIONDALE, NY
$5,000
Jul 29, 2024
7
FROMEN, JOHN J. JR
IndividualBUFFALO, NY
$3,400
Sep 30, 2024
8
LOGOTHETIS, GEORGE
LIBRA GROUP • EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$3,300
Oct 30, 2024
9
SIMON, BRIAN W.
HOLLIS PUBLIC AFFAIRS, INC. • GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$3,300
Nov 25, 2024
10
LO, WILLIAM
CRYSTAL STEEL FABRICATORS, INC. • CEO
IndividualNEWTOWN SQUARE, PA
$3,300
Oct 21, 2024

Donor Network - Rep. Meeks, Gregory W. [D-NY-5]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 52 nodes and 58 connections

Total contributions: $58

Top Donors - Rep. Meeks, Gregory W. [D-NY-5]

Showing top 21 donors by contribution amount

2 Orgs19 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 16 helped, 6 harmed.

  • +Defense Contractorsconfidence 0.95

    Title II authorizes direct loans and foreign military financing up to $8 billion (Sec 202), extends Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative with $300M FY2026-2027 (Sec 204), authorizes lend-lease authority (Sec 201), and supports Baltic countries with $30M FMF grants each (Sec 203), all benefiting defense contractors.

  • −Oil & Gasconfidence 0.90

    Section 303 imposes sanctions on Russian oil and gas extraction, refinement, or production; Section 315 bans importation of energy products produced at refineries using Russian crude oil; Section 314 increases duties on Russian goods to 500% ad valorem, affecting oil and gas imports.

  • −Coal Miningconfidence 0.90

    Section 303 imposes sanctions on Russian coal extraction mining, refinement, or production.

  • −Nuclear Powerconfidence 0.85

    Section 306 imposes sanctions on foreign persons endangering the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant; Section 307 imposes sanctions on Rosatom and related nuclear transactions; Section 305 imposes sanctions on Crimea tunnel construction linked to Russian energy infrastructure.

  • Section 308 imposes sanctions on vessels transporting Russian oil in contravention of price cap policy; Section 309 imposes sanctions on SWIFT and financial messaging services used by Russian energy entities; Section 310 prohibits transactions involving Russian sovereign debt, affecting energy project financing.

  • Section 108 authorizes $250,000,000 for Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty for FY 2026 and supports its bureau expansion; Section 109 requires strategy to counter Russian disinformation and support independent media outlets including Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty.

+ 16 more industries not shown.

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Meeks, Gregory W. [D-NY-5])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HELPS

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of State

Very Strong
Vector: 62%
Pages: 214-216AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The Ukraine Support Act directly enacts the Project 2025 recommendation for sustained U.S. involvement in Ukraine, including military and economic aid, NATO reinforcement, and sanctions on Russia, aligning with the goal of defeating Putin and restoring pre-invasion borders."

Key themes:Ukraine supportmilitary aideconomic aidNATO reaffirmationsanctions on Russia

— 181 — Department of State Instead of pressuring the Iranian theocracy to move toward democracy, the Obama Administration threw the brutal regime an economic lifeline by giving hundreds of billions of dollars to the Iranian government and providing other sanc- tions relief. This economic relief did not moderate the regime, but emboldened its brutality, its efforts to expand its nuclear weapons programs, and its support for global terrorism. Former President Obama has admitted his lack of support for the Green Movement during his Administration was an error and blamed it on poor advisors—yet those same advisors are involved with the Biden Administration’s insistence on reducing pressure on the theocracy and resurrecting a nuclear deal. The next Administration should neither preserve nor repeat the mistakes of the Obama and Biden Administrations. The correct future policy for Iran is one that acknowledges that it is in U.S. national security interests, the Iranian people’s human rights interests, and a broader global interest in peace and stability for the Iranian people to have the democratic government they demand. This decision to be free of the country’s abusive leaders must of course be made by the Iranian people, but the United States can utilize its own and others’ economic and diplo- matic tools to ease the path toward a free Iran and a renewed relationship with the Iranian people. The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela Once a model of democracy and a true U.S. ally, the Bolivarian Republic of Ven- ezuela (Venezuela) has all but collapsed under the Communist regimes of the late Hugo Chavez and Nicolas Maduro. In the 24 years since Hugo Chavez was first elected Venezuelan president in 1999, the country has violently cracked down on pro-democracy citizens and organizations, shattered its once oil-rich economy, empowered domestic criminal cartels, and helped fuel a hemispheric refugee crisis. Venezuela has swung from being one of the most prosperous, if not the most prosperous, country in South America to being one of the poorest. Its Communist leadership has also drawn closer to some of the United States’ greatest interna- tional foes, including the PRC and Iran, which have long sought a foothold in the Americas. Indeed, Venezuela serves as a reminder of just how fragile democratic institutions that are not maintained can be. To contain Venezuela’s Communism and aid international partners, the next Administration must take important steps to put Venezuela’s Communist abusers on notice while making strides to help the Venezuelan people. The next Administration must work to unite the hemisphere against this significant but underestimated threat in the Southern Hemisphere. Russia One issue today that starkly divides conservatives is the Russia–Ukraine con- flict. The common ground seems to be recognition that presidential leadership in 2025 must chart the course. — 182 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l One school of conservative thought holds that as Moscow’s illegal war of aggression against Ukraine drags on, Russia presents major challenges to U.S. interests, as well as to peace, stability, and the post-Cold War security order in Europe. This viewpoint argues for continued U.S. involvement including military aid, economic aid, and the presence of NATO and U.S. troops if necessary. The end goal of the conflict must be the defeat of Russian President Vladimir Putin and a return to pre-invasion border lines. l Another school of conservative thought denies that U.S. Ukrainian support is in the national security interest of America at all. Ukraine is not a member of the NATO alliance and is one of the most corrupt nations in the region. European nations directly affected by the conflict should aid in the defense of Ukraine, but the U.S. should not continue its involvement. This viewpoint desires a swift end to the conflict through a negotiated settlement between Ukraine and Russia. l The tension between these competing positions has given rise to a third approach. This conservative viewpoint eschews both isolationism and interventionism. Rather, each foreign policy decision must first ask the question: What is in the interest of the American people? U.S. military engagement must clearly fall within U.S. interests; be fiscally responsible; and protect American freedom, liberty, and sovereignty, all while recognizing Communist China as the greatest threat to U.S. interests. Thus, with respect to Ukraine, continued U.S. involvement must be fully paid for; limited to military aid (while European allies address Ukraine’s economic needs); and have a clearly defined national security strategy that does not risk American lives. Regardless of viewpoints, all sides agree that Putin’s invasion of Ukraine is unjust and that the Ukrainian people have a right to defend their homeland. Furthermore, the conflict has severely weakened Putin’s military strength and provided a boost to NATO unity and its importance to European nations. The next conservative President has a generational opportunity to bring res- olution to the foreign policy tensions within the movement and chart a new path forward that recognizes Communist China as the defining threat to U.S. interests in the 21st century. The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea Peace and stability in Northeast Asia are vital interests of the United States. The Republic of Korea (South Korea) and Japan are critical allies for ensuring a free and open Indo–Pacific. They are indispensable military, economic, diplomatic, and technology partners. The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK, or North

Department of State

Strong
Vector: 68%
Pages: 214-216AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill aligns strongly with Project 2025's Department of State section by supporting continued U.S. military and economic aid to Ukraine, reaffirming NATO's importance, and opposing Russian aggression—consistent with the first conservative viewpoint outlined. It also reflects the shared agreement that Putin's invasion is unjust and Ukraine has a right to defend itself."

Key themes:Ukraine supportNATO reaffirmationopposition to Russian aggressionU.S. national security interestmilitary and economic aid

— 182 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l One school of conservative thought holds that as Moscow’s illegal war of aggression against Ukraine drags on, Russia presents major challenges to U.S. interests, as well as to peace, stability, and the post-Cold War security order in Europe. This viewpoint argues for continued U.S. involvement including military aid, economic aid, and the presence of NATO and U.S. troops if necessary. The end goal of the conflict must be the defeat of Russian President Vladimir Putin and a return to pre-invasion border lines. l Another school of conservative thought denies that U.S. Ukrainian support is in the national security interest of America at all. Ukraine is not a member of the NATO alliance and is one of the most corrupt nations in the region. European nations directly affected by the conflict should aid in the defense of Ukraine, but the U.S. should not continue its involvement. This viewpoint desires a swift end to the conflict through a negotiated settlement between Ukraine and Russia. l The tension between these competing positions has given rise to a third approach. This conservative viewpoint eschews both isolationism and interventionism. Rather, each foreign policy decision must first ask the question: What is in the interest of the American people? U.S. military engagement must clearly fall within U.S. interests; be fiscally responsible; and protect American freedom, liberty, and sovereignty, all while recognizing Communist China as the greatest threat to U.S. interests. Thus, with respect to Ukraine, continued U.S. involvement must be fully paid for; limited to military aid (while European allies address Ukraine’s economic needs); and have a clearly defined national security strategy that does not risk American lives. Regardless of viewpoints, all sides agree that Putin’s invasion of Ukraine is unjust and that the Ukrainian people have a right to defend their homeland. Furthermore, the conflict has severely weakened Putin’s military strength and provided a boost to NATO unity and its importance to European nations. The next conservative President has a generational opportunity to bring res- olution to the foreign policy tensions within the movement and chart a new path forward that recognizes Communist China as the defining threat to U.S. interests in the 21st century. The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea Peace and stability in Northeast Asia are vital interests of the United States. The Republic of Korea (South Korea) and Japan are critical allies for ensuring a free and open Indo–Pacific. They are indispensable military, economic, diplomatic, and technology partners. The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK, or North — 183 — Department of State Korea) must be deterred from military conflict. The United States cannot permit the DPRK to remain a de facto nuclear power with the capacity to threaten the United States or its allies. This interest is both critical to the defense of the Amer- ican homeland and the future of global nonproliferation. The DPRK must not be permitted to profit from its blatant violations of international commitments or to threaten other nations with nuclear blackmail. Both interests can only be served if the U.S. disallows the DPRK’s rogue regime behavior. OTHER INTERNATIONAL ENGAGEMENTS Western Hemisphere The United States has a vested interest in a relatively united and economically prosperous Western Hemisphere. Nonetheless, the region now has an overwhelm- ing number of socialist or progressive regimes, which are at odds with the freedom and growth-oriented policies of the U.S. and other neighbors and who increasingly pose hemispheric security threats. A new approach is therefore needed, one that simultaneously allows the U.S. to re-posture in its best interests and helps regional partners enter a new century of growth and opportunity. The following core policies must be part of this new direction: l A “sovereign Mexico” policy. Mexico is currently a national security disaster. Bluntly stated, Mexico can no longer qualify as a first-world nation; it has functionally lost its sovereignty to muscular criminal cartels that effectively run the country. The current dynamic is not good for either U.S. citizens or Mexicans, and the perfect storm created by this cartel state has negative effects that are damaging the entire hemisphere. The next Administration must both adopt a posture that calls for a fully sovereign Mexico and take all steps at its disposal to support that result in as rapid a fashion as possible. l A fentanyl-free frontier. The same cartels that parasitically run Mexico are also working with the PRC to fuel the largest drug crisis in the history of North America. These Mexican cartels are working closely with Chinese fentanyl precursor chemical manufacturers, importing those precursor chemicals into Mexico, manufacturing fentanyl on Mexican soil, and shipping it into the United States and elsewhere. The highly potent narcotic is having an unprecedented lethal impact on the American citizenry. The next Administration must leverage its new insistence on a sovereign Mexico and work with other Western Hemisphere partners to halt the fentanyl crisis and put a decisive end to this unprecedented public health threat.

Department of State

Strong
Vector: 59%
Pages: 220-222AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The Ukraine Support Act's emphasis on NATO support, sanctions against Russia, and military/economic aid to Ukraine aligns closely with Project 2025's European policy goals of strengthening NATO burden-sharing, countering Russian aggression, and prioritizing core security and economic engagement in Europe."

Key themes:NATOEuropean securityCountering Russian aggressionSanctionsMilitary assistance

— 187 — Department of State United States, but at least some of them would eventually try if allowed to consolidate their operations and plan such attacks. The immediate threat they pose lies in their abilities and willingness to strike American targets in their regions of operation or to harm U.S. interests in other ways. The U.S. should support capable African military and security operations through the State Department and other federal agencies responsible for granting foreign military education, training, and security assistance. l Build a coalition of the cooperative. Rather than thinning limited federal resources by spreading funds across all countries (including some that are unsupportive or even hostile to the United States,) the next Administration should focus on those countries with which the U.S. can expect a mutually beneficial relationship. After being designated focus countries by the State Department, such nations should receive a full suite of American engagement. That said, the next Administration should still maintain a baseline level of contact even with those countries with which it has less- than-fruitful relationships in order to encourage positive developments and to be in position to seize unexpected diplomatic opportunities as they arise. l Focus on core diplomatic activities, and stop promoting policies birthed in the American culture wars. African nations are particularly (and reasonably) non-receptive to the U.S. social policies such as abortion and pro-LGBT initiatives being imposed on them. The United States should focus on core security, economic, and human rights engagement with African partners and reject the promotion of divisive policies that hurt the deepening of shared goals between the U.S. and its African partners. Europe American foreign policy has long benefited from cooperation with the countries of Europe (generally, the EU), and any conservative Administration should build on this resource. Yet the transatlantic relationship is complex, with security, trade, and political dimensions. First, the Europe, Eurasia, and Russia region is made up of relatively wealthy and technologically advanced societies that should be expected to bear a fair share of both security needs and global security architecture: The United States cannot be expected to provide a defense umbrella for countries unwilling to contribute appropriately. At stake after 2024 will be examining the status of the Wales Pledge of 2 percent of gross domestic product toward defense by NATO members. The new Administration will also want to encourage nations to exceed that pledge. Second, transatlantic trade is a significant part of the global economy, and it is in the U.S. national interest to amplify it, especially because this means weaning — 188 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Europe of its dependence on China. However, there are also transatlantic trade tensions that disturb the U.S.–EU relationship and that have been evident across Administrations. The U.S. must undertake a comprehensive review of trade arrangements between the EU and the United States to assure that U.S. businesses are treated fairly and to build productive reciprocity. Outside the EU, trade with the post-Brexit U.K. needs urgent development before London slips back into the orbit of the EU. Third, in the wake of Brexit, EU foreign policy now takes place without U.K. input, which disadvantages the United States, given that the U.K. has historically been aligned with many U.S. positions. Therefore, U.S. diplomacy must be more attentive to inner-EU developments, while also developing new allies inside the EU—especially the Central European countries on the eastern flank of the EU, which are most vulnerable to Russian aggression. South and Central Asia Many key American interests and responsibilities are found in South and Central Asia. Specifically, continuing to advance the bilateral relationship with India to mutual benefit is a crucial objective for U.S. policy. India plays a crucial role in countering the Chinese threat and securing a free and open Indo–Pacific. It is a critical security guarantor for the key routes of air and sea travel linking East and West and an important emerging U.S. economic partner. For instance, the 2019 Department of Defense Indo–Pacific Strategy Report noted that the Indian Ocean area “is at the nexus of global trade and commerce, with nearly half of the world’s 90,000 commercial vessels and two thirds of global oil trade traveling through its sea lanes. The region boasts some of the fastest-growing economies on Earth.”14 Meanwhile, the threat of transnational terrorism remains acute. The humiliat- ing withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan after a 20-year military campaign has created new challenges. It has provided an opportunity to reset the deeply troubled U.S.–Pakistan relationship and reassess U.S. counterterrorism strategy in the region. The long-standing India–Pakistan rivalry and tensions regarding the disputed territory of Kashmir continue to pose risks to regional stability, especially because both countries are nuclear powers. The State Department’s role in strengthening the regional security and eco- nomic framework linking the U.S and India is crucial. In addition, the department has important functional responsibilities in dealing with a range of threats from nuclear proliferation to transnational proliferation. While American statecraft should also seek to improve bilateral relations throughout the region, U.S. policy must be clear-eyed and realistic about the perfidiousness of the Taliban regime in Afghanistan and the military–political rule in Pakistan. There can be no expecta- tion of normal relations with either.

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Full Policy Text

Related Bills