The bill
Diesel Emissions Reduction Act of 2025
S. 2235, 119th Congress — read as touching Surface Transportation.
Sponsored by
Sen. Whitehouse, Sheldon [D-RI]
ID: W000802
Follow the money
The bill
S. 2235, 119th Congress — read as touching Surface Transportation.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
20 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
The alignment
This bill's text tracks the "Introduction" section, p. 410-412 of the Mandate for Leadership.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 226.
October 28, 2025
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the esteemed members of Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** Ah, the noble goal of reducing diesel emissions! How quaint. The real purpose is to reauthorize a program that's been limping along since 2005, providing a convenient excuse for lawmakers to pretend they care about the environment while actually catering to their corporate overlords.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** Oh boy, this is where it gets exciting! The bill amends Section 797(a) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 by striking "2024" and inserting "2029". Wow, what a bold move! Essentially, they're extending the program's lifespan by five years. I'm sure the environment will be saved by this Herculean effort.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects: diesel engine manufacturers, trucking companies, and environmental groups (who'll likely be bought off or silenced). But let's not forget the real stakeholders – the politicians who'll benefit from campaign donations and lobbying largesse. After all, someone has to fund those re-election campaigns.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** *yawn* This bill will have about as much impact on diesel emissions as a Band-Aid on a bullet wound. It's a token gesture designed to appease the environmental crowd while allowing the real polluters to continue business as usual. The only significant outcome will be the perpetuation of a program that's more concerned with lining corporate pockets than actually reducing emissions.
Diagnosis: This bill is suffering from a severe case of "Greenwashing Syndrome" – a disease characterized by the superficial appearance of environmental concern, but ultimately driven by greed and a desire for power. The symptoms include:
* Tokenistic language and vague objectives * Lack of meaningful action or enforcement mechanisms * Overemphasis on corporate interests over environmental concerns * Politicians more concerned with appearances than actual results
Treatment: A healthy dose of skepticism, followed by a strong injection of reality. Unfortunately, this patient is likely terminal – the disease has progressed too far, and the politicians are too invested in their own self-interest to change course.
Prognosis: More of the same – empty promises, half-hearted measures, and a continued disregard for the environment. But hey, at least they're trying... right?
Sen. Whitehouse, Sheldon [D-RI]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No organization contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 5 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: C001047
Top Contributors
10
ID: B001288
Top Contributors
10
ID: S001198
Top Contributors
10
ID: B001303
Top Contributors
10
ID: B001261
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 56 nodes and 35 connections (55 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $193,760
Showing top 14 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 2 helped.
Section 2 reauthorizes the diesel emissions reduction program through 2029, which provides funding for retrofitting or replacing diesel engines in trucks, buses, and other surface transportation vehicles, benefiting the industry.
The diesel emissions reduction program includes non-road equipment such as construction machinery; reauthorization continues funding for retrofits, benefiting construction firms and equipment manufacturers.
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Sen. Whitehouse, Sheldon [D-RI])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.
This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.
— 378 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Budget The FY 2023 budget request for FECM was approximately $893.2 million.40 FECM’s requested appropriation can be compared to the more than $4.0 billion requested for the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.41 The disparity in funding demonstrates how DOE’s research activities and substantial portions of its organizational structure are now focused entirely on the reduction of CO2 emissions rather than energy access or energy security. OFFICE OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY (EERE) Mission/Overview The Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy traces its roots to the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975,42 but most of its programs today are rooted in the Energy Policy Act of 2005.43 Under the Biden Administration, EERE’s mission is “to accelerate the research, development, demonstration, and deployment of technologies and solutions to equitably transition America to net- zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions economy-wide by no later than 2050” and “ensure [that] the clean energy economy benefits all Americans.”44 The office is made up of three “pillars”: energy efficiency, renewable energy, and sustainable transportation. Needed Reforms l End the focus on climate change and green subsidies. Under the Biden Administration, EERE is a conduit for taxpayer dollars to fund progressive policies, including decarbonization of the economy and renewable resources. EERE has focused on reducing carbon dioxide emissions to the exclusion of other statutorily defined requirements such as energy security and cost. For example, EERE’s five programmatic priorities during the Biden Administration are all focused on decarbonization of the electricity sector, the industrial sector, transportation, buildings, and the agricultural sector.45 l Eliminate energy efficiency standards for appliances. Pursuant to the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 as amended, the agency is required to set and periodically tighten energy and/or water efficiency standards for nearly all kinds of commercial and household appliances, including air conditioners, furnaces, water heaters, stoves, clothes washers and dryers, refrigerators, dishwashers, light bulbs, and showerheads. Current law and regulations reduce consumer choice, drive up costs for consumer appliances, and emphasize energy efficiency to the exclusion of other important factors such as cycle time and reparability. — 379 — Department of Energy and Related Commissions New Policies l Eliminate EERE. The next Administration should work with Congress to eliminate all of DOE’s applied energy programs, including those in EERE (with the possible exception of those that are related to basic science for new energy technology). Taxpayer dollars should not be used to subsidize preferred businesses and energy resources, thereby distorting the market and undermining energy reliability. l Reduce EERE funding. If EERE cannot be eliminated, then the Administration should engage with Congress and the House and Senate Appropriations Committees on EERE’s budget. EERE’s budget was around $1.5 billion a year when the advances were made that led to dramatic cost decreases in wind, solar, and battery technology. In recent years, Congress has appropriated many billions of dollars in excess of EERE’s normal budget (DOE requested more than $4.0 billion for FY 2023).46 It should rescind these excess monies so that DOE is not required to spend them. If funding cannot be reduced, then it should be reallocated to more fundamental research and less toward commercialization and deployment. l Focus on fundamental science and research. If EERE cannot be eliminated, then the Administration should focus on broader and more fundamental energy research, consistent with law. The Biden Administration is too focused on deploying technologies instead of relying on the private sector. Moreover, under the Biden Administration, EERE is too focused on decarbonization and not at all on the cost of energy. l Eliminate energy efficiency standards for appliances. The next Administration should work with Congress to modify or repeal the law mandating energy efficiency standards. Before (or in lieu of) repealing the law, there are steps the agency can take to refocus on the consumer by giving full force to the provisions already in the law that serve to limit regulatory overreach and protect against excessively stringent standards. For example, the Trump DOE prioritized the relatively few appliance regulations that were likely to save consumers the most energy and refrained from those whose modest benefits are unlikely to justify the costs. It also took steps to ensure that any new standards do not compromise product quality or eliminate any features. These and other consumer protections are in the statute but have often been ignored.
Policy matches are calculated using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text. A score of 60% or higher indicates meaningful thematic overlap. This does not imply direct causation or intent, but highlights areas where legislation aligns with Project 2025 policy objectives.
Tradeable Energy Performance Standards Act
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating to "Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Walk-In Coolers and Walk-In Freezers".
CORE Act of 2025