REPO Implementation Act of 2025

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/s/2918

Last Updated: April 21, 2026

REPO Implementation Act of 2025

S. 2918, 119th Congress.

The sponsor

Sen. Whitehouse, Sheldon [D-RI]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$73,160 raised

20 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

85% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of State" section, p. 214-216 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 243.

October 29, 2025

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

The REPO Implementation Act of 2025 is a bill that seeks to improve the implementation of the seizure of Russian sovereign assets for the benefit of Ukraine. As a self-serving billionaire, I'll analyze this bill through the lens of its potential impact on my wealth and influence.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective of this bill is to facilitate the transfer of frozen Russian sovereign assets to an interest-bearing account, known as the Ukraine Support Fund, which will be used to provide assistance to Ukraine. The bill aims to improve the implementation of the Rebuilding Economic Prosperity and Opportunity for Ukrainians Act by recognizing the Porto Declaration and unlocking the value of an estimated $300 billion in Russian sovereign assets frozen across the region.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill makes several key changes to existing law, including:

* Recognizing the Porto Declaration and its call to repurpose Russian sovereign assets for Ukraine * Allowing the President to transfer funds into the Ukraine Support Fund without confiscating them * Investing amounts in the Ukraine Support Fund in interest-bearing obligations of the United States or in obligations guaranteed as to both principal and interest by the United States * Obligating the Secretary of State to expend at least $250,000,000 every 90 days from the Ukraine Support Fund for assistance to Ukraine

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties and stakeholders include:

* The Russian Federation, whose sovereign assets will be seized and repurposed for Ukraine * Ukraine, which will receive assistance from the Ukraine Support Fund * The United States government, which will be responsible for implementing the bill's provisions * Other countries that are participating states of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe

**Potential Impact & Implications:** As a self-serving billionaire, I see this bill as a potential threat to my wealth and influence. The seizure of Russian sovereign assets could lead to a destabilization of global markets and potentially impact my investments. Furthermore, the bill's focus on providing assistance to Ukraine may divert resources away from other areas that are more beneficial to my interests.

However, I also see opportunities for consolidation and deregulation in this bill. The creation of the Ukraine Support Fund and its investment in interest-bearing obligations could provide a new avenue for me to invest and grow my wealth. Additionally, the bill's emphasis on cooperation with foreign countries may create new opportunities for me to expand my business interests abroad.

Overall, I will be monitoring this bill closely and working to shape its implementation to serve my interests. As a billionaire, it is essential to stay ahead of the curve and adapt to changing circumstances to maintain my wealth and influence.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a bill is a proposed law that must go through the legislative process to become an actual law. This one, S 2918, is titled the REPO Implementation Act of 2025.

**Main Purpose & Objectives** The main purpose of this bill is to amend the Rebuilding Economic Prosperity and Opportunity for Ukrainians Act (REPO) to improve the implementation of seizing Russian sovereign assets for the benefit of Ukraine. Remember when we learned about the concept of checks and balances? This bill aims to facilitate cooperation between the US government and other countries to achieve this goal.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill makes several key changes to existing law:

* It recognizes the Porto Declaration, which calls on OSCE participating states to unlock the value of frozen Russian sovereign assets for Ukraine. * It allows the President to transfer Russian aggressor state sovereign assets into an interest-bearing account without confiscating them. * It invests amounts in the Ukraine Support Fund in interest-bearing obligations or guaranteed US obligations. * It requires quarterly obligations of funds from the Ukraine Support Fund to benefit Ukraine, with a minimum amount of $250 million.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** The affected parties and stakeholders include:

* The Ukrainian government and people * Russian sovereign asset holders * Other countries participating in the OSCE * US government agencies, such as the Department of State and Treasury

**Potential Impact & Implications** If passed, this bill could have significant implications for Ukraine's economic recovery and Russia's relations with the international community. It may also set a precedent for future cooperation between countries on asset seizures and repurposing.

Now, I know some of you might be thinking, "Wait, what about the legislative process?" Ah, yes, as we covered in 8th grade civics class, this bill has already been introduced in the Senate, referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations, and reported back without amendment. Next steps would include debate, voting, and potentially being sent to the House of Representatives for further consideration.

I hope that's clear. Any questions?

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

My fellow truth-seekers, gather 'round! Today, we're diving into the REPO Implementation Act of 2025, a bill that's got more twists and turns than a rabbit hole in Wonderland.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

On the surface, this bill aims to improve the implementation of seizing Russian sovereign assets for Ukraine's benefit. But, my friends, don't be fooled! This is just a smokescreen for something much bigger. The real objective is to create a framework for the US government to confiscate and manage foreign assets, setting a precedent for future seizures.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The bill amends the Rebuilding Economic Prosperity and Opportunity for Ukrainians Act (REPO) by:

1. Recognizing the Porto Declaration, which calls on OSCE participating states to unlock Russian sovereign assets frozen across the region. 2. Allowing the President to transfer funds into the Ukraine Support Fund without confiscating them. 3. Investing amounts in the fund in interest-bearing obligations of the US or guaranteed by the US. 4. Obligating quarterly expenditures from the fund for Ukrainian assistance.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

The usual suspects are involved:

1. The US government, which gets to expand its asset-seizure powers. 2. Ukraine, which receives financial support (but at what cost?). 3. Russia, whose assets are being targeted (a clever distraction from the real agenda?). 4. European Union countries and G7 members, who are implicated in the OSCE's Porto Declaration.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

This bill has far-reaching consequences:

1. **Asset seizure precedent**: The US government is establishing a framework for confiscating foreign assets, which could be used against other nations or even its own citizens. 2. **Global economic manipulation**: By investing funds in interest-bearing obligations, the US can influence global markets and economies. 3. **Ukraine's dependence on US aid**: This bill reinforces Ukraine's reliance on US financial support, potentially creating a client-state relationship. 4. **Escalating tensions with Russia**: The targeted seizure of Russian assets could exacerbate tensions between the two nations.

Now, my fellow truth-seekers, connect the dots: What if this bill is just one piece in a larger puzzle? What if it's part of a broader strategy to control global finances, manipulate economies, and expand US influence? Ah, but that's just speculation... or is it?

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Outrageous music plays in the background)

Folks, we've got a doozy of a bill on our hands here! The REPO Implementation Act of 2025 is a masterclass in bureaucratic doublespeak and elitist manipulation. But don't worry, I'm here to break it down for you.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This bill claims to "improve the implementation" of seizing Russian sovereign assets for Ukraine's benefit. Sounds noble, right? Wrong! It's just a thinly veiled attempt by our so-called "leaders" to further entangle us in the quagmire of international politics and line the pockets of their Ukrainian buddies.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends the Rebuilding Economic Prosperity and Opportunity for Ukrainians Act (try saying that five times fast) to:

* Recognize the Porto Declaration, which calls on OSCE participating states to "unlock" Russian sovereign assets frozen across the region. Code for: let's take Russia's money and give it to Ukraine! * Transfer seized Russian assets into an interest-bearing account, because who doesn't love a good game of financial shell-shock? * Invest funds in the Ukraine Support Fund (because we all know how well government investments work out) and obligate at least $250 million every 90 days for Ukrainian "assistance." Assistance? Ha! More like handouts to our favorite Eastern European friends.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Russian oligarchs, Ukrainian politicians, and of course, the American taxpayer. Because who else is going to foot the bill for this international boondoggle?

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill has all the makings of a classic case of "freedom"-sapping government overreach. By seizing Russian assets and funneling them into Ukraine's coffers, we're essentially declaring economic war on Russia while propping up a corrupt Ukrainian regime.

But hey, who needs national sovereignty when you've got international elites calling the shots? This bill is just another example of our so-called "representatives" selling out American interests to further their own globalist agendas. Wake up, folks! It's time to take back our country from these unelected bureaucrats and reclaim our freedom!

(Outrageous music continues to play as I give a knowing smirk to the camera)

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, brought to you by the esteemed members of Congress. Let's dissect this bill and uncover the real disease beneath the surface.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The REPO Implementation Act of 2025 is a cleverly crafted piece of legislation designed to seize Russian sovereign assets for the benefit of Ukraine. Or so it claims. In reality, this bill is a thinly veiled attempt to justify the confiscation of foreign assets under the guise of "supporting" Ukraine.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The bill amends the Rebuilding Economic Prosperity and Opportunity for Ukrainians Act (REPO) by:

1. Recognizing the Porto Declaration, which calls on OSCE participating states to repurpose frozen Russian sovereign assets for Ukraine. 2. Allowing the President to transfer non-confiscated funds into the Ukraine Support Fund without confiscating them. 3. Investing amounts in the Ukraine Support Fund in interest-bearing obligations of the United States or guaranteed by the US. 4. Obligating quarterly expenditures from the fund for assistance to Ukraine.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

The usual suspects are involved:

1. The Ukrainian government, which will receive a nice influx of cash and assets. 2. Russian oligarchs and the Russian government, who will have their assets seized or frozen. 3. US taxpayers, who will foot the bill for this "support" through interest-bearing obligations. 4. Various lobbying groups and special interests, who will no doubt benefit from the increased funding and influence.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

This bill is a perfect example of legislative doublespeak. On the surface, it appears to be a noble effort to support Ukraine. However, upon closer inspection, it's clear that this bill is designed to:

1. Expand executive power by allowing the President to unilaterally transfer funds and assets. 2. Create a slush fund for Ukraine, which can be used for various purposes, including lining the pockets of corrupt officials. 3. Set a precedent for confiscating foreign assets under dubious circumstances. 4. Increase US involvement in the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, potentially escalating tensions.

In conclusion, this bill is a masterclass in legislative deception. It's a cynical attempt to justify asset seizure and expand executive power while pretending to support a noble cause. The real disease beneath this bill is the corruption and self-interest that drives our politicians to create such legislation.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**Main Purpose and Objectives**

The REPO Implementation Act of 2025 (S. 2918) aims to improve the implementation of the seizure of Russian sovereign assets for the benefit of Ukraine, as authorized by the Rebuilding Economic Prosperity and Opportunity for Ukrainians Act. The bill seeks to facilitate the transfer of these assets into an interest-bearing account, known as the Ukraine Support Fund, and ensure their investment and use in supporting Ukraine.

**Key Provisions and Changes to Existing Law**

The bill makes several key changes to existing law:

1. **Recognition of Porto Declaration**: The bill recognizes the Porto Declaration adopted by the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), which calls on participating states to unlock the value of frozen Russian sovereign assets for Ukraine's benefit. 2. **Transfer of Assets to Ukraine Support Fund**: The bill allows the President to transfer Russian sovereign assets into the Ukraine Support Fund without confiscating them, providing a more efficient process for utilizing these assets. 3. **Investment of Amounts in Ukraine Support Fund**: The bill requires the Secretary of the Treasury to invest a portion of the account established under section 104(d) of the Rebuilding Economic Prosperity and Opportunity for Ukrainians Act in interest-bearing obligations of the United States or guaranteed by the United States. 4. **Quarterly Obligation of Funds**: The bill establishes a quarterly obligation of funds from the Ukraine Support Fund to benefit Ukraine, with a minimum amount of $250 million (except when less than $250 million remains in the fund). 5. **Engagement with Foreign Countries**: The bill requires the President to submit reports on covered countries where Russian sovereign assets are located and the amount of such assets.

**Affected Parties and Stakeholders**

The affected parties and stakeholders include:

1. Ukraine: As the primary beneficiary of the seized Russian sovereign assets. 2. Russia: As the country whose assets are being seized and utilized for Ukraine's benefit. 3. United States Government: The President, Secretary of State, and Secretary of the Treasury have roles in implementing the bill's provisions. 4. European Union and G7 countries: As participating states of the OSCE, they may be involved in the process of unlocking frozen Russian sovereign assets.

**Potential Impact and Implications**

The REPO Implementation Act of 2025 has several potential impacts and implications:

1. **Increased Support for Ukraine**: The bill's provisions aim to provide more efficient and effective support to Ukraine through the use of seized Russian sovereign assets. 2. **Enhanced International Cooperation**: The recognition of the Porto Declaration and engagement with foreign countries may foster greater international cooperation in addressing Russia's aggression against Ukraine. 3. **Potential Economic Implications**: The investment and use of seized Russian sovereign assets could have economic implications, both for Russia and the global economy.

Overall, the REPO Implementation Act of 2025 seeks to improve the implementation of existing law and provide more effective support to Ukraine through the utilization of seized Russian sovereign assets.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (neutral personality)

Let's break down this gnarly bill, bro.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The REPO Implementation Act of 2025 is all about helpin' out Ukraine, man. The main goal is to improve the implementation of seizing Russian sovereign assets and using them for Ukraine's benefit. It's like takin' a chunk of Russia's wealth and redirecting it to support Ukraine's economy and people.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

This bill makes some key changes to existing law, bro:

1. **Recognition of Porto Declaration**: The bill acknowledges the Porto Declaration, which calls on OSCE participating states to unlock the value of frozen Russian sovereign assets for Ukraine. 2. **Transfer of Assets**: It allows the President to transfer Russian aggressor state sovereign assets into an interest-bearing account without confiscating them first. 3. **Investment of Amounts**: The bill requires the Secretary of the Treasury to invest a portion of the Ukraine Support Fund in interest-bearing obligations, which will generate more funds for Ukraine. 4. **Quarterly Obligation**: It establishes a quarterly obligation to obligate and expend at least $250 million from the Ukraine Support Fund for assistance to Ukraine.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

This bill affects several parties, dude:

1. **Ukraine**: The main beneficiary of this bill, as it aims to provide financial support and assistance. 2. **Russia**: Russia's sovereign assets are being targeted, which could impact their economy and interests. 3. **European Union and G7 countries**: As participating states in the OSCE, they're encouraged to unlock the value of frozen Russian sovereign assets for Ukraine. 4. **US Government**: The President, Secretary of State, and Secretary of the Treasury have roles in implementing this bill.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

This bill has some far-reaching implications, bro:

1. **Economic Support for Ukraine**: It could provide significant financial support to Ukraine, helping them recover from the ongoing conflict. 2. **Russia's Economic Interests**: The seizure and transfer of Russian sovereign assets could impact Russia's economy and interests. 3. **International Relations**: This bill might affect relationships between the US, EU, G7 countries, and Russia, as it involves cooperation on asset seizures and transfers. 4. **Global Governance**: It highlights the importance of international cooperation in addressing global challenges, like conflict and economic instability.

In summary, this bill is all about helpin' Ukraine by seizin' Russian sovereign assets and redirecting them for their benefit. It's a complex issue with far-reaching implications, but it's a step towards supportin' those affected by the conflict, man.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**Bill Analysis: S 2918 - REPO Implementation Act of 2025**

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The REPO Implementation Act aims to improve the implementation of the seizure of Russian sovereign assets for the benefit of Ukraine, as authorized by the Rebuilding Economic Prosperity and Opportunity for Ukrainians Act. The bill seeks to facilitate the transfer of frozen Russian assets to an interest-bearing account, known as the Ukraine Support Fund, which will be used to provide assistance to Ukraine.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**

1. **Recognition of Porto Declaration:** The bill recognizes the Porto Declaration adopted by the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), which calls on participating states to unlock the value of frozen Russian sovereign assets for Ukraine's benefit. 2. **Transfer of Assets to Ukraine Support Fund:** The bill allows the President to transfer Russian aggressor state sovereign assets into the Ukraine Support Fund without confiscating them, enabling the investment of these funds in interest-bearing obligations. 3. **Investment of Amounts in Ukraine Support Fund:** The Secretary of the Treasury is required to invest a portion of the account established under Section 104(d) of the Rebuilding Economic Prosperity and Opportunity for Ukrainians Act in interest-bearing obligations of the United States or guaranteed by the United States. 4. **Quarterly Obligation of Funds:** The bill requires the Secretary of State to obligate and expend not less than $250,000,000 every 90 days from the Ukraine Support Fund for assistance to Ukraine.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**

1. **Ukraine:** The primary beneficiary of the seized Russian sovereign assets. 2. **Russian Federation:** The country whose sovereign assets are being targeted for seizure and transfer to the Ukraine Support Fund. 3. **European Union (EU) Member States:** As participating states of the OSCE, EU member countries may be involved in the implementation of the Porto Declaration. 4. **United States Government Agencies:** The Departments of State and Treasury will play key roles in implementing the bill's provisions.

**Potential Impact & Implications:**

1. **Enhanced Support for Ukraine:** The bill is expected to provide significant financial assistance to Ukraine, supporting its economic recovery and development. 2. **Increased Pressure on Russia:** The seizure and transfer of Russian sovereign assets may increase pressure on Russia to end its aggression against Ukraine and agree to compensate Ukraine for damages. 3. **Potential Diplomatic Fallout:** The implementation of the bill's provisions may lead to diplomatic tensions between the United States, Russia, and other affected countries.

**Monied Interest Analysis:** While there is no direct evidence of industry lobby groups or special interest organizations backing this specific bill, it is likely that Ukrainian-American advocacy groups and organizations supporting Ukraine's interests in the United States have played a role in shaping the legislation. Additionally, some lawmakers may have received campaign contributions from individuals or organizations with ties to Ukraine or the defense industry, which could be seen as having an

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Sen. Whitehouse, Sheldon [D-RI]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$73,160

14 donors

PACs

Organizations

Committees

Individuals

$73,160

No PAC contributions found

No organization contributions found

No committee contributions found

PAGE, GLORIA

4 transactions

$17,060

HEISING, MARK

1 transaction

$6,600

BILLINGSLEY, LINDSAY

2 transactions

$6,600

GATES, WILLIAM H. III

2 transactions

$6,600

JONAS, HOWARD

2 transactions

$6,600

CONOVER, CATHERINE M.

1 transaction

$3,300

LANG, DAVID

1 transaction

$3,300

ARNOLD, JOHN

1 transaction

$3,300

FRENCH, JAMES

1 transaction

$3,300

GREENBERG, LARRY

1 transaction

$3,300

JONAS, DEBORAH

1 transaction

$3,300

KATZ, MONIQUE

1 transaction

$3,300

KLARMAN, SETH

1 transaction

$3,300

MILNER, DAVID

1 transaction

$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Sen. Risch, James E. [R-ID]

ID: R000584

Top Contributors

CRW RESOURCES

OrganizationCOEUR D ALENE, ID

$1,000

Feb 29, 2024

SNELL, PETER

ARBELLA CAPITAL • REAL EATATE

IndividualARLINGTON, VA

$5,000

May 8, 2024

KAYALI, ZEID

SELF • PHYSICIAN

IndividualPASADENA, CA

$3,500

Feb 9, 2023

MOORE, JEFFREY

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualLAS VEGAS, NV

$3,435

Nov 19, 2024

KTELEH, TAREK

RHEUMATOLOGY • DOCTOR

IndividualFISHERS, IN

$3,300

Dec 23, 2024

ALAAMA, ABDUL M.D.

SELF • GASTROENTEROLOGY

IndividualWHITTIER, CA

$3,300

Feb 9, 2023

ASHOURI, DIANA

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA • PHYSICIAN

IndividualPASADENA, CA

$3,300

Feb 9, 2023

DIAB, MOHAMED KHEIR

MASIMO CORPORATION • DIRECTOR

IndividualLADERA RANCH, CA

$3,300

Feb 9, 2023

MOUJTAHED, SAED

OWL REXALL INFUSION • DIRECTOR

IndividualTRABUCO CANYON, CA

$3,300

Feb 9, 2023

MONSEN, MARION F

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualSUN VALLEY, ID

$3,300

Sep 6, 2023

Sen. Shaheen, Jeanne [D-NH]

ID: S001181

Top Contributors

TILT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE LLC

OrganizationPLYMOUTH, MI

$250

Feb 6, 2024

HAWASH, NOUR

BLINK TECH INC. • VICE PRESIDENT

IndividualDUNN LORING, VA

$6,600

Dec 12, 2024

HAWASH, NOUR

IndividualDUNN LORING, VA

$6,600

Dec 23, 2024

HAWASH, NOUR

BLINK TECH INC. • VICE PRESIDENT

IndividualDUNN LORING, VA

$3,300

Dec 12, 2024

HAWASH, NOUR

BLINK TECH INC. • VICE PRESIDENT

IndividualDUNN LORING, VA

$3,300

Dec 12, 2024

HAWASH, SAFA

ACCLIVITY LLC • BUSINESS CONSULTANT

IndividualDUNN LORING, VA

$3,300

Dec 11, 2024

HAWASH, SAFA

ACCLIVITY LLC • BUSINESS CONSULTANT

IndividualDUNN LORING, VA

$3,300

Dec 11, 2024

JONDY, JENAN

N/A • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualFLUSHING, MI

$3,300

Dec 16, 2024

KANDIL, MARIAM

SELF-EMPLOYED • BUSINESS OWNER

IndividualGREAT FALLS, VA

$3,300

Dec 16, 2024

KANDIL, MARIAM

SELF-EMPLOYED • BUSINESS OWNER

IndividualGREAT FALLS, VA

$3,300

Dec 16, 2024

Sen. Grassley, Chuck [R-IA]

ID: G000386

Top Contributors

SAC & FOX TRIBE OF THE MISSISSIPPI IN IOWA

COMTAMA, IA

$2,000

Aug 8, 2023

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

COMPRIOR LAKE, MN

$1,000

Jul 23, 2024

WINRED

PACARLINGTON, VA

$25

Jul 4, 2024

SCHWARZMAN, CHRISTINE

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$6,600

Jan 10, 2024

SCHWARZMAN, STEPHEN

BLACKSTONE • CEO

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$6,600

Jan 16, 2024

KUMAR, SHALLI

AVG ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY • CHAIR

IndividualBETTENDORF, IA

$6,600

Jun 11, 2024

STARRETT, RONALD

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualCENTENNIAL, CO

$5,800

Jan 24, 2023

COLLINS, RICHARD

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualMARSHALLTOWN, IA

$5,523

Oct 1, 2024

COLLINS, RICHARD

IndividualMARSHALLTOWN, IA

$5,523

Oct 7, 2024

WEISS, LUKE

HOOVER'S HATCHERY • PRESIDENT

IndividualMASON CITY, IA

$3,300

Dec 11, 2024

Sen. Blumenthal, Richard [D-CT]

ID: B001277

Top Contributors

OLSON, LYNDON

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualWACO, TX

$3,300

Dec 20, 2024

ALIX, JAY

ALIX PARTNERS • FOUNDER

IndividualBIRMINGHAM, MI

$3,300

Oct 2, 2023

KIM, CHRISTINE M.

BBB LLC • ATTORNEY

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Oct 31, 2023

ALIX, JAY

ALIX PARTNERS • FOUNDER

IndividualBIRMINGHAM, MI

$3,300

Apr 15, 2024

ROURE, RITA

PAGNY - LINCOLN HOSPITAL • PHYSICIAN

IndividualGREENWICH, CT

$3,300

Apr 10, 2024

ROURE, RITA

PAGNY - LINCOLN HOSPITAL • PHYSICIAN

IndividualGREENWICH, CT

$3,300

Apr 10, 2024

CHAVEZ, TOM

KRUX INC. • CEO

IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA

$3,300

Jul 13, 2024

CHAVEZ, TOM

KRUX INC. • CEO

IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA

$3,300

Jul 13, 2024

JONES, JERRY C.

LIVERAMP INC. • EXECUTIVE

IndividualLITTLE ROCK, AR

$3,300

Sep 19, 2024

NESSEL, ARIEL

NESSEL DEVELOPMENT • OWNER

IndividualROSS, CA

$3,300

Jul 12, 2024

Sen. Graham, Lindsey [R-SC]

ID: G000359

Top Contributors

WINRED PAC

PACARLINGTON, VA

$3,833

Oct 15, 2024

CATAWBA INDIAN NATION

OrganizationROCK HILL, SC

$3,300

May 21, 2024

BEVERLY B GROSSMAN TRUST

OrganizationENCINO, CA

$1,550

Jul 12, 2024

BELL FAMILY TRUST

OrganizationINDIAN WELLS, CA

$1,000

Mar 1, 2024

BEVERLY B GROSSMAN TRUST

OrganizationENCINO, CA

$230

Oct 2, 2024

BEVERLY B GROSSMAN TRUST

OrganizationENCINO, CA

$200

Jul 30, 2024

BEVERLY B GROSSMAN TRUST

OrganizationENCINO, CA

$150

Aug 14, 2024

ALFRED SEYMOUR BASSLER TR

RETIRED • RETIRED

OrganizationWOODBINE, MD

$100

Jul 26, 2024

ALFRED SEYMOUR BASSLER TR

RETIRED • RETIRED

OrganizationWOODBINE, MD

$100

Jul 26, 2024

BEVERLY B GROSSMAN TRUST

OrganizationENCINO, CA

$100

Jul 30, 2024

Sen. Wicker, Roger F. [R-MS]

ID: W000437

Top Contributors

EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS

OrganizationCHEROKEE, NC

$25,000

Sep 13, 2024

MISSISSIPPI BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS

OrganizationCHOCTAW, MS

$15,000

Nov 5, 2024

WT CONSULTANTS LLC

OrganizationJACKSON, MS

$2,500

Jan 12, 2023

WAYPOINT CONSULTING, LLC

OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC

$1,000

Mar 26, 2024

HEDERMAN BROTHERS, LLC

OrganizationMADISON, MS

$1,000

Oct 9, 2024

CHOUEST, GARY

EDISON CHOUEST OFFSHORE, LLC • CEO

IndividualGALLIANO, LA

$100,000

Dec 1, 2023

HALE, ROBERT T. JR.

GRANITE TELECOM • CEO

IndividualBOSTON, MA

$100,000

Jun 28, 2023

BLUE, J. NEAL

GENERAL ATOMICS • CEO

IndividualLA JOLLA, CA

$50,000

Dec 21, 2023

HALE, ROBERT T. JR.

GRANITE TELECOM • CEO

IndividualBOSTON, MA

$50,000

Apr 12, 2024

DUFF, THOMAS M.

SOUTHERN TIRE MART • PRESIDENT

IndividualHATTIESBURG, MS

$50,000

Sep 30, 2024

Sen. Bennet, Michael F. [D-CO]

ID: B001267

Top Contributors

CHEROKEE NATION

OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK

$1,000

Oct 18, 2024

CHEROKEE NATION

OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK

$1,000

Jun 21, 2024

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$1,000

Jun 30, 2024

QUILLER GALLERY LLC

OrganizationCREEDE, CO

$250

Nov 20, 2023

BARRON, THOMAS A

SELF EMPLOYED • AUTHOR

IndividualBOULDER, CO

$5,000

Sep 18, 2023

WALLINGER, DANIELLE

STUDIO D DESIGN • CEO

IndividualENGLEWOOD, CO

$5,000

Oct 15, 2024

WALLINGER, DIRK

YORK SPACE SYSTEMS • CEO

IndividualENGLEWOOD, CO

$5,000

Oct 15, 2024

LEPRINO, TERRY LYNN

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualDENVER, CO

$3,300

Dec 3, 2024

SIE, JOHN J.

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualENGLEWOOD, CO

$3,300

Dec 3, 2024

HEGYI, ALBERT

1ST FINANCIAL • BANKER

IndividualSOUTHPORT, CT

$3,300

Oct 26, 2023

Sen. Cornyn, John [R-TX]

ID: C001056

Top Contributors

WINRED

COMARLINGTON, VA

$47

Jul 10, 2024

WEEKLEY, RICHARD W

WEEKLEY PROPERTIES • REAL ESTATE BROKER/DEVELOPER

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$100,000

Dec 27, 2023

MCINGVALE, JAMES F

GALLERY FURNITURE • OWNER/OPERATOR

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$50,000

Feb 27, 2023

MCINGVALE, LINDA

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$50,000

Feb 27, 2023

DUNN, TIMOTHY

CROWN QUEST OPERATING • EXECUTIVE

IndividualMIDLAND, TX

$45,000

Apr 4, 2023

MARTIN, KIMBERLY R

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$20,000

Mar 13, 2023

BLAINE, JAY C.

N/A • N/A

IndividualROCKWALL, TX

$16,478

Oct 11, 2024

THOMPSON, JERE W. MR. JR.

AMBIT ENERGY • CEO

IndividualDALLAS, TX

$13,200

Mar 15, 2023

MIDDLETON, MAYES

MIDDLETON OIL CO • OIL AND GAS

IndividualGALVESTON, TX

$12,500

Jan 7, 2023

MIDDLETON, MACEY

IndividualGALVESTON, TX

$12,500

Jan 7, 2023

Sen. Gallego, Ruben [D-AZ]

ID: G000574

Top Contributors

NISQUALLY INDIAN TRIBE

OrganizationOLYMPIA, WA

$3,300

Nov 6, 2023

SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationHIGHLAND, CA

$3,300

Dec 27, 2023

SUQUAMISH INDIAN TRIBE

OrganizationSUQUAMISH, WA

$3,300

Nov 6, 2023

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION

OrganizationSELLS, AZ

$3,300

Oct 26, 2023

AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS

OrganizationPALM SPRINGS, CA

$3,300

Oct 21, 2024

SNOQUALMIE TRIBE

OrganizationSNOQUALMIE, WA

$3,300

Oct 25, 2024

VIEJAS BAND OF KUMEYAAY INDIANS

OrganizationALPINE, CA

$3,300

Nov 4, 2024

AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS

OrganizationPALM SPRINGS, CA

$3,300

Jan 8, 2024

NOTTAWASEPPI HURON BAND OF THE POTAWATOMI

OrganizationFULTON, MI

$3,300

Mar 26, 2024

POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS

OrganizationATMORE, AL

$3,300

Mar 28, 2024

Sen. Cantwell, Maria [D-WA]

ID: C000127

Top Contributors

SAC FOX TRIBE

OrganizationTAMA, IA

$5,000

Oct 29, 2024

LOWER ELWHA KLALLAM TRIBE

OrganizationPORT ANGELES, WA

$3,360

Mar 31, 2023

SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationHIGHLAND, CA

$3,300

Oct 28, 2023

SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationHIGHLAND, CA

$3,300

Dec 21, 2023

SAN PABLO LYTTON TRIBE

OrganizationSAN PABLO, CA

$3,300

Nov 16, 2023

SAN PABLO LYTTON TRIBE

OrganizationSAN PABLO, CA

$3,300

Nov 16, 2023

SAULT STE MARIE TRIBE OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS

OrganizationSAULT SAINTE MARIE, MI

$3,300

Dec 14, 2023

SENECA NATION OF INDIANS

OrganizationSALAMANCA, NY

$3,300

Dec 14, 2023

MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE

OrganizationAUBURN, WA

$3,300

May 12, 2023

NISQUALLY INDIAN TRIBE

OrganizationOLYMPIA, WA

$3,300

Jun 30, 2023

Donor Network - Sen. Whitehouse, Sheldon [D-RI]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 60 nodes and 35 connections (55 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $117,718

Top Donors - Sen. Whitehouse, Sheldon [D-RI]

Showing top 14 donors by contribution amount

14 Individuals

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of State

Strong

Vector: 60%

Pages: 214-216AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill aligns with Project 2025's Department of State section by supporting continued U.S. involvement in Ukraine through economic aid derived from seized Russian assets, reflecting the view that U.S. engagement must be fiscally responsible and serve American interests while opposing Russian aggression. It also emphasizes international cooperation, consistent with Project 2025's recognition of NATO unity and the need to counter Russian threats to European stability."

Key themes:Ukraine supportRussian asset seizurefiscal responsibilityinternational cooperationcountering Russian aggression

— 182 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l One school of conservative thought holds that as Moscow’s illegal war of aggression against Ukraine drags on, Russia presents major challenges to U.S. interests, as well as to peace, stability, and the post-Cold War security order in Europe. This viewpoint argues for continued U.S. involvement including military aid, economic aid, and the presence of NATO and U.S. troops if necessary. The end goal of the conflict must be the defeat of Russian President Vladimir Putin and a return to pre-invasion border lines. l Another school of conservative thought denies that U.S. Ukrainian support is in the national security interest of America at all. Ukraine is not a member of the NATO alliance and is one of the most corrupt nations in the region. European nations directly affected by the conflict should aid in the defense of Ukraine, but the U.S. should not continue its involvement. This viewpoint desires a swift end to the conflict through a negotiated settlement between Ukraine and Russia. l The tension between these competing positions has given rise to a third approach. This conservative viewpoint eschews both isolationism and interventionism. Rather, each foreign policy decision must first ask the question: What is in the interest of the American people? U.S. military engagement must clearly fall within U.S. interests; be fiscally responsible; and protect American freedom, liberty, and sovereignty, all while recognizing Communist China as the greatest threat to U.S. interests. Thus, with respect to Ukraine, continued U.S. involvement must be fully paid for; limited to military aid (while European allies address Ukraine’s economic needs); and have a clearly defined national security strategy that does not risk American lives. Regardless of viewpoints, all sides agree that Putin’s invasion of Ukraine is unjust and that the Ukrainian people have a right to defend their homeland. Furthermore, the conflict has severely weakened Putin’s military strength and provided a boost to NATO unity and its importance to European nations. The next conservative President has a generational opportunity to bring res- olution to the foreign policy tensions within the movement and chart a new path forward that recognizes Communist China as the defining threat to U.S. interests in the 21st century. The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea Peace and stability in Northeast Asia are vital interests of the United States. The Republic of Korea (South Korea) and Japan are critical allies for ensuring a free and open Indo–Pacific. They are indispensable military, economic, diplomatic, and technology partners. The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK, or North — 183 — Department of State Korea) must be deterred from military conflict. The United States cannot permit the DPRK to remain a de facto nuclear power with the capacity to threaten the United States or its allies. This interest is both critical to the defense of the Amer- ican homeland and the future of global nonproliferation. The DPRK must not be permitted to profit from its blatant violations of international commitments or to threaten other nations with nuclear blackmail. Both interests can only be served if the U.S. disallows the DPRK’s rogue regime behavior. OTHER INTERNATIONAL ENGAGEMENTS Western Hemisphere The United States has a vested interest in a relatively united and economically prosperous Western Hemisphere. Nonetheless, the region now has an overwhelm- ing number of socialist or progressive regimes, which are at odds with the freedom and growth-oriented policies of the U.S. and other neighbors and who increasingly pose hemispheric security threats. A new approach is therefore needed, one that simultaneously allows the U.S. to re-posture in its best interests and helps regional partners enter a new century of growth and opportunity. The following core policies must be part of this new direction: l A “sovereign Mexico” policy. Mexico is currently a national security disaster. Bluntly stated, Mexico can no longer qualify as a first-world nation; it has functionally lost its sovereignty to muscular criminal cartels that effectively run the country. The current dynamic is not good for either U.S. citizens or Mexicans, and the perfect storm created by this cartel state has negative effects that are damaging the entire hemisphere. The next Administration must both adopt a posture that calls for a fully sovereign Mexico and take all steps at its disposal to support that result in as rapid a fashion as possible. l A fentanyl-free frontier. The same cartels that parasitically run Mexico are also working with the PRC to fuel the largest drug crisis in the history of North America. These Mexican cartels are working closely with Chinese fentanyl precursor chemical manufacturers, importing those precursor chemicals into Mexico, manufacturing fentanyl on Mexican soil, and shipping it into the United States and elsewhere. The highly potent narcotic is having an unprecedented lethal impact on the American citizenry. The next Administration must leverage its new insistence on a sovereign Mexico and work with other Western Hemisphere partners to halt the fentanyl crisis and put a decisive end to this unprecedented public health threat.

Department of Commerce

Weak

Vector: 60%

Pages: 705-707AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"Both the bill and the Project 2025 policy address economic measures against Russia, but the bill focuses on seizing and utilizing Russian sovereign assets for Ukraine’s benefit, while Project 2025 emphasizes tightening export controls, Entity List expansions, and data/commerce restrictions. The overlap is limited to the broader theme of applying economic pressure on Russia for national security purposes."

Key themes:RussiaSanctionsEconomic pressureNational security

— 673 — Department of Commerce Export Enforcement officers through improved and frequent training so they are able to detect export-control violations. EAR Revisions. The U.S. Government needs a new export control moderniza- tion effort to tighten the EAR policies governing licenses to countries of concern, including China and Russia (specifically, revise and/or reverse the 2008 through 2016 policies). When authoritarian governments explain what they plan to do, believe them unless hard evidence demonstrates otherwise. Case in point: China’s and Russia’s stated civil–military fusion policies demand central government command-and-control style systems in which every private entity serves the interests of the state and is forced to provide technology, services, capacity, and data to the central govern- ment and the military. Through this structure, commercial activities are routinely weaponized by authoritarian regimes that repeatedly identify the U.S. as an enemy. Accordingly, U.S. export control policies must be updated to reflect these realities and the associated threats to national security. Key priorities for EAR modernization for countries of concern should be: l Eliminating the “specially designed” licensing loophole; l Redesignating China and Russia to more highly prohibitive export licensing groups (country groups D or E); l Eliminating license exceptions; l Broadening foreign direct product rules; l Reducing the de minimis threshold from 25 percent to 10 percent—or 0 percent for critical technologies; l Tightening the deemed export rules to prevent technology transfer to foreign nationals from countries of concern; l Tightening the definition of “fundamental research” to address exploitation of the open U.S. university system by authoritarian governments through funding, students and researchers, and recruitment; l Eliminating license exceptions for sharing technology with controlled entities/countries through standards-setting “activities” and bodies; and l Improving regulations regarding published information for technology transfers. — 674 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise The next few years will prove or disprove the assertion that the U.S. stands on the precipice of a Cold War with China. Many believe that a Cold War has already begun; if so, then strategic decoupling from China is necessary and, fundamentally, any exports of goods, software, and technology to countries of concern, whether directly or indirectly, should be prohibited or controlled in the absence of good cause (e.g., humanitarian and medical aid, food aid). Entity List and Sanctions. There are currently just over 500 Chinese and over 500 Russian companies on the Department of Commerce’s Entity List, which reg- ulates exports of controlled and uncontrolled items to designated entities. Given China’s Civil–Military Fusion Strategy and Russia’s massive war efforts facili- tated by a broad range of the Russian economy, BIS must add more entities to the Entity List and apply a license review “policy of denial” that prohibits exports to these entities. Entity List parties that violate export controls should be placed on the BIS Denied Persons List (and thereby lose export privileges) and, if the violations are significant enough, they should also be sanctioned by the Department of Treasury. Data Transfer and Apps Used for Surveillance. Department of Commerce leadership should work across government agencies to address privacy and data concerns arising out of “big tech” from national security and export control per- spectives. In particular, they should draft and implement an executive order (EO) based on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, which expands export control authority beyond ECRA’s scope (goods, software, technology) to regulate and restrict exports of U.S. persons’ data to countries of concern. The EO should establish a framework for the types of personal data subject to export controls and licensing policy by country, and the BIS should implement the EO through regulations. BIS should additionally designate app providers (such as WeChat and Byte Dance/TikTok) known for undermining U.S. national security through data collection, surveillance, and influence operations, to the Entity List. This listing would prevent app users from program updates, which would quickly make these apps non-operational in the United States. NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION Break Up NOAA. The single biggest Department of Commerce agency outside of decennial census years is the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which houses the National Weather Service, National Marine Fisheries Service, and other components. NOAA garners $6.5 billion of the department’s $12 billion annual operational budget and accounts for more than half of the department’s personnel in non-decadal Census years (2021 figures). NOAA consists of six main offices: l The National Weather Service (NWS);

Department of Defense

Weak

Vector: 58%

Pages: 128-130AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill centers on seizing and utilizing Russian sovereign assets to provide economic support to Ukraine, whereas the Project 2025 Defense section focuses on acquisition reform, stockpile replenishment, and defense industrial base improvements. The only tangential connection is that supporting Ukraine could indirectly affect U.S. stockpiles, but there is no direct overlap in objectives or mechanisms."

Key themes:Ukraine supportdefense industrial basestockpile replenishmentinternational cooperation

— 96 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise relevant. This allows the acquisition community to focus on portfolio management and move money around more easily instead of being locked into inflexible, multiyear procurement cycles. 2. The President should examine the recommendations of the congressionally mandated Commission on Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution Reform4 and develop a strategy for implementing those that the Administration considers to be in the best interests of the American people. The commission’s final report is due on September 1, 2023. 3. Develop legislation or other means of providing funding outside the traditional PPBE process for the prototyping and experimentation of emerging technologies that are deemed essential to modernization and future conflict. Consider creating a “fast track” for projects that satisfy the most pressing national security needs. 4. Require the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, the Under Secretary for Research and Engineering, and all service secretaries to conduct “Night Court” and use existing authorities to terminate outdated or underperforming programs so that money can be used for what works and will work. Require the Under Secretaries and service secretaries to brief the Secretary annually on the results. 5. Require the Office of the Secretary of Defense to research and report on the acquisition processes used by America’s adversaries to improve our understanding of how they are often able to innovate and field new technologies on a faster timeline. l Strengthen America’s defense industrial base. 1. Replenish and maintain U.S. stockpiles of ammunition and other equipment that have been depleted as a result of U.S. support to Ukraine. This will strengthen the defense industry supply chain and ensure that adequate inventory exists if it is needed for a future conflict. 2. Collaborate with industry to develop a prioritized list of reforms that the DOD and Congress can enact and implement to incentivize industry to help America’s military innovate and field needed capabilities. — 97 — Department of Defense 3. Strengthen the ability of acquisition authorities to engage in multiyear procurements and block buys. This will improve private-sector rates of return, thereby incentivizing defense contractors to partner with the government. It will also reduce government overhead by reducing the number of procurement competitions. 4. Prioritize the U.S. and allies under the “domestic end product” and “domestic components” requirements of the Build America, Buy America Act.5 Currently, defense companies are required to manufacture defense items for the U.S. government that are 100 percent domestically produced and at least 50 percent composed of domestically produced components. However, there are loopholes that allow companies to manufacture these items overseas. This can create supply chain and other issues, especially in wartime. Manufacturing components and end products domestically and with allies spurs factory development, increases American jobs, and builds resilience in America’s defense industrial base. 5. Review the sectors currently prioritized for onshoring or “friendshoring” of manufacturing (kinetic capabilities, castings and forgings, critical materials, microelectronics, space, and electric vehicle batteries); evaluate them according to the strategic landscape; and expand or reprioritize the list as appropriate. 6. Help small businesses to become medium-size and large vendors, which encourages a more resilient industrial base and fosters competition. Encourage and plan for durable supply chains for small businesses so they also have commercial/private-sector customers and are not solely dependent on defense orders, which can be highly specialized, expensive, and irregular. 7. Increase external engagement among small businesses to inform them of DOD’s needs and how they could work with DOD to meet national security priorities. l Optimize the DOD acquisition community. 1. Create incentives to emphasize speed and agility in decision-making for prototyping and program-of-record starts and terminations. Most bureaucrats would rather follow a checklist and fail than go outside the procedures and win because failure means negative

Department of Energy and Related Commissions

Minimal

Vector: 58%

Pages: 443-445AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The REPO Implementation Act of 2025 focuses on seizing and utilizing Russian sovereign assets to support Ukraine, which is unrelated to the Department of Energy and Related Commissions policy objectives in Project 2025, such as grid security, energy infrastructure, or nuclear energy management."

— 411 — Department of Energy and Related Commissions 19. President Donald J. Trump, Executive Order 13920, “Securing the United States Bulk-Power System,” May 1, 2020, in Federal Register, Vol. 85, No. 86 (May 4, 2020), pp. 26595–26599, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/ pkg/FR-2020-05-04/pdf/2020-09695.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 20. 18 U.S. Code § 824a(c), https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/16/824a (accessed February 27, 2023). 21. Report No. 117-98, Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Bill, 2022, Committee on Appropriations, U.S. House of Representatives, 117th Cong. 1st Sess., July 20, 2021, p. 6, https:// www.congress.gov/117/crpt/hrpt98/CRPT-117hrpt98.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 22. H.R. 3684, Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, Public Law No. 11-58, 117th Congress, November 15, 2021, Division J, Title III. 23. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, p. 7. 24. Timothy Gardner, “White House Asks Congress for $500 mln to Modernize Oil Reserve,” Reuters, November 16, 2022, https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-oil-spr-idAFL1N32C36I (accessed February 13, 2023). 25. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Electricity, “Our History,” https://www.energy.gov/oe/about-us/our- history (accessed February 13, 2023). 26. Press release, “Secretary of Energy Signs Order to Mitigate Security Risks to the Nation’s Electric Grid,” U.S. Department of Energy, December 17, 2021, https://www.energy.gov/articles/secretary-energy-signs-order- mitigate-security-risks-nations-electric-grid (accessed February 13, 2023). 27. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Electricity, “Revocation of Prohibition Order Securing Critical Defense Facilities,” Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 76 (April 22, 2021), pp. 21308–21309, https://www.govinfo.gov/ content/pkg/FR-2021-04-22/pdf/2021-08483.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 28. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, pp. 19 and 61. 29. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy, “About Us,” https://www.energy.gov/ne/about-us (accessed February 13, 2023). 30. H.R. 3809, Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, Public Law No. 97-425, 97th Congress, January 7, 1983, https:// www.congress.gov/97/statute/STATUTE-96/STATUTE-96-Pg2201.pdf (accessed February 24, 2023). 31. The Heritage Foundation, “Budget Blueprint for Fiscal Year 2023: Reduce the DOE Office of Nuclear Energy,” https://www.heritage.org/budget/pages/recommendations/1.270.127.html. 32. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, pp. 23 and 58. 33. 42 USC § 16291, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/16291 (accessed February 27, 2023). 34. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management, “About Us: Mission,” https:// www.energy.gov/fecm/mission (accessed February 13, 2023). 35. U.S. Government Accountability Office, Carbon Capture and Storage: Actions Needed to Improve DOE Management of Demonstration Projects, GAO-22-105111, December2021, https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-22- 105111.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 36. International Energy Agency, The Role of Critical Minerals in Clean Energy Transitions, World Energy Outlook Special Report, revised March 2022, https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/ffd2a83b-8c30-4e9d-980a- 52b6d9a86fdc/TheRoleofCriticalMineralsinCleanEnergyTransitions.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 37. See 42 U.S. Code § 16291. 38. 42 U.S. Code Ch. 55, §§ 4321–4347, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/chapter-55 (accessed February 27, 2023). 39. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “Categorical Exclusions from Environmental Review,” Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Request for Comment, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 87 (May 7, 2021), pp. 24514–24516, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-05-07/pdf/2021-09675.pdf (accessed February 27, 2023), and Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “Categorical Exclusions from Environmental Review,” Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Reopening of Comment Period, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 160 (August 23, 2021), pp. 47032–47033, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-08-23/pdf/2021-18058.pdf (accessed February 27, 2023). 40. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, pp. 19, 21, 23, and 52. — 412 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 41. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, pp. 3, 6, 12, 19, 21, and 23. 42. S. 622, Energy Policy and Conservation Act, Public Law 94-163, 94th Congress, December 22, 1975, https:// www.congress.gov/94/statute/STATUTE-89/STATUTE-89-Pg871.pdf (accessed February 27, 2023). 43. H.R. 6, Energy Policy Act of 2005, Public Law No. 109-58, 109th Congress, August 8, 2005, https://www. congress.gov/109/plaws/publ58/PLAW-109publ58.pdf (accessed February 27, 2023). 44. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, “About the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy,” https://www.energy.gov/eere/about-office-energy-efficiency-and- renewable-energy (accessed February 28, 2023). 45. Ibid. 46. See note 41, supra. 47. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, pp. 19, 23, 43, and 49. 48. See U.S. Department of Energy, Grid Deployment Office, “About Us,” https://www.energy.gov/gdo/about-us (accessed February 13, 2023). 49. U.S. Department of Energy, Grid Deployment Office, “Building a Better Grid Initiative,” https://www.energy. gov/gdo/building-better-grid-initiative (accessed February 13, 2023). 50. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, pp. 2, 19, 21, 23, and 84. “The FY 2023 Budget Request to Congress proposes to split the Electricity appropriation account into two accounts: Electricity and Grid Deployment Office (GDO). Had the proposed FY 2023 structure been in place in FY 2021 and FY 2022, the $7,000,000 shown under the Electricity account’s Transmission Permitting and Technical Assistance (TPTA) program would have appeared under Grid Technical Assistance in GDO and the $3,000,000 shown under Program Direction in the Electricity account represents the estimated share of Electricity PD funding associated with TPTA and would have appeared under Program Direction in GDO.” Ibid., p. 84, note. 51. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations, “About Us: Our Mission,” https://www. energy.gov/oced/about-us (accessed February 13, 2023). 52. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, p. 6. 53. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations, “About Us: Our Story,” https://www. energy.gov/oced/about-us (accessed February 28, 2023). 54. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations, “OCED Project Portfolio,” https://www. energy.gov/oced/office-clean-energy-demonstrations (accessed February 28, 2023). 55. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Volume 3, Cybersecurity, Energy Security, and Emergency Response, Federal Energy Management Program, Grid Deployment Office, Indian Energy Policy & Programs, Loan Programs, Manufacturing & Energy Supply Chains, Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations, Petroleum Reserves, Power Marketing Administrations, State and Community Energy Programs, April 2022, p. 104, https://www.energy. gov/sites/default/files/2022-09/doe-fy2023-budget-volume-3-v2.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 56. See, for example, ibid., pp. 104 and 107. 57. U.S. Department of Energy, Loan Program Office, “LPO Year in Review 2022: New Legislation,” January 5, 2023, https://www.energy.gov/lpo/articles/lpo-year-review-2022 (accessed February 28, 2023). Emphases in original. 58. H.R. 6256, To Ensure That Goods Made with Forced Labor in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of the People’s Republic of China Do Not Enter the United States Market, and for Other Purposes, Public Law No. 117-78, 117th Congress, December 23, 2021, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ78/PLAW-117publ78.pdf (accessed February 28, 2023). 59. H.R. 2272, America COMPETES Act, Public Law 110–69, 110th Congress, August 9, 2007, § 5012, https://www. congress.gov/110/plaws/publ69/PLAW-110publ69.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 60. Ibid., § 5012(c)(1). 61. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, March 2022, p. 103.

Department of Energy and Related Commissions

Minimal

Vector: 58%

Pages: 410-412AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill deals with seizing Russian sovereign assets to support Ukraine, whereas the Project 2025 excerpt concerns Department of Energy fossil fuel programs, LNG exports, and the Strategic Petroleum Reserve—there is no substantive policy overlap."

— 377 — Department of Energy and Related Commissions majority of critical materials are mined or processed (or both) in Russia and China.36 The processing of critical materials from fossil fuel waste products (primarily coal) has shown some potential and, in view of our vast domestic reserves of coal and abundant waste from coal mining and combustion, should be pursued. New Policies l Eliminate FECM. The next Administration should work with Congress to eliminate all of DOE’s applied energy programs, including those in FECM (with the possible exception of those that are related to basic science for new energy technology). Taxpayer dollars should not be used to subsidize preferred businesses and energy resources, thereby distorting the market and undermining energy reliability. l Rename FECM (if it cannot be eliminated) under its original designation as the Office of Fossil Energy and with its original mission: increasing energy security and supply through fossil fuels. l Focus on energy security and supply. Absent elimination of FECM, Congress should direct FECM appropriations toward increasing energy security and supply. Congress has already directed these goals (including the reduction of costs).37 l Ensure that LNG export approvals are reviewed and processed in a timely manner. In particular: 1. Ensure that LNG export applications are reviewed and approved expeditiously. 2. Maintain the categorical exclusion from the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)38 for LNG exports that was established by the Trump Administration39 or (if it is revoked by the Biden Administration) reinstate it. 3. Work with Congress to expand automatic approvals to include allies such as NATO as well as nations that have free trade agreements with the U.S. l Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR). The Biden Administration moved responsibility for the SPR to CESER. Regardless of where the responsibility lies, the new DESAS should ensure that the SPR is maintained for national strategic purposes and not misused for political gain. — 378 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Budget The FY 2023 budget request for FECM was approximately $893.2 million.40 FECM’s requested appropriation can be compared to the more than $4.0 billion requested for the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.41 The disparity in funding demonstrates how DOE’s research activities and substantial portions of its organizational structure are now focused entirely on the reduction of CO2 emissions rather than energy access or energy security. OFFICE OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY (EERE) Mission/Overview The Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy traces its roots to the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975,42 but most of its programs today are rooted in the Energy Policy Act of 2005.43 Under the Biden Administration, EERE’s mission is “to accelerate the research, development, demonstration, and deployment of technologies and solutions to equitably transition America to net- zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions economy-wide by no later than 2050” and “ensure [that] the clean energy economy benefits all Americans.”44 The office is made up of three “pillars”: energy efficiency, renewable energy, and sustainable transportation. Needed Reforms l End the focus on climate change and green subsidies. Under the Biden Administration, EERE is a conduit for taxpayer dollars to fund progressive policies, including decarbonization of the economy and renewable resources. EERE has focused on reducing carbon dioxide emissions to the exclusion of other statutorily defined requirements such as energy security and cost. For example, EERE’s five programmatic priorities during the Biden Administration are all focused on decarbonization of the electricity sector, the industrial sector, transportation, buildings, and the agricultural sector.45 l Eliminate energy efficiency standards for appliances. Pursuant to the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 as amended, the agency is required to set and periodically tighten energy and/or water efficiency standards for nearly all kinds of commercial and household appliances, including air conditioners, furnaces, water heaters, stoves, clothes washers and dryers, refrigerators, dishwashers, light bulbs, and showerheads. Current law and regulations reduce consumer choice, drive up costs for consumer appliances, and emphasize energy efficiency to the exclusion of other important factors such as cycle time and reparability.

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Sen. Whitehouse, Sheldon

Diesel Emissions Reduction Act of 2025

119/s/2235

First Rhode Island Regiment Congressional Gold Medal Act

119/s/567

A resolution recognizing January 2025 as "National Mentoring Month".

119/sres/55

Back to All Bills