Support for Expectant and Parenting Foster Youth Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/7655
Last Updated: July 22, 2026

Sponsored by

Rep. Yakym, Rudy [R-IN-2]

ID: Y000067

Follow the money

The bill

Support for Expectant and Parenting Foster Youth Act

HR. 7655, 119th Congress — read as touching Hospitals & Health Systems.

The sponsor

Rep. Yakym, Rudy [R-IN-2]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$201,750 raised

30 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

62% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Introduction" section, p. 515-517 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 558.

May 10, 2026

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

Passed House

🏛️

Senate Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Support for Expectant and Parenting Foster Youth Act (HR 7655) claims to improve supports for expectant and parenting youth who have experienced foster care by strengthening coordination with the Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program. How touching. I'm sure it has nothing to do with the fact that these vulnerable populations are a convenient prop for politicians to virtue-signal about their "commitment" to social welfare.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends section 477 of the Social Security Act to connect foster youth with evidence-based home visiting and support services. Oh, wow. Because what these kids really need is more bureaucratic red tape and another layer of administrative overhead. The amendments also require states to certify that they have processes in place to provide information about these services to eligible families. Because, you know, the current system of neglecting foster youth wasn't working well enough.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include expectant and parenting foster youth, state governments, and the Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program. I'm sure the latter is just thrilled to have more paperwork and bureaucratic hoops to jump through. As for the foster youth, they'll probably be too busy navigating the labyrinthine system to notice any actual improvement in their lives.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this bill is negligible, at best. It's a Band-Aid on a bullet wound, designed to make politicians look good while doing nothing to address the systemic issues plaguing the foster care system. The real implication here is that our elected officials are more interested in grandstanding than actual governance. They're treating the symptoms of a diseased system instead of performing the necessary surgery to fix it.

In medical terms, this bill is akin to prescribing a placebo to a patient with a terminal illness. It might make them feel better for a little while, but it won't cure the underlying disease. And that's exactly what our politicians are counting on – that we'll be too stupid to notice the difference. Well, I've got news for them: I'm not buying it. This bill is a farce, and everyone involved should be ashamed of themselves.

Related Topics

Housing & Urban Development
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Yakym, Rudy [R-IN-2]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$201,750
21 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$33,450
Committees
$0
Individuals
$168,300

No PAC contributions found

1
POKAGON BAND OF POTAWATOMI INDIANS
3 transactions
$13,300
2
MATCH-E-BE-NASH-SHE-WISH BAND OF POTTAWATOMI INDIANS
2 transactions
$6,600
3
MASHANTUCKET PEQUOT TRIBAL NATION
1 transaction
$3,300
4
EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS
1 transaction
$3,300
5
PECHANGA BAND OF INDIANS
1 transaction
$3,300
6
SAGINAW CHIPPEWA TRIBE OF MICHIGAN
1 transaction
$2,000
7
CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA
1 transaction
$1,650

No committee contributions found

1
CLARK, DWIGHT
3 transactions
$26,400
2
DODEN, DARYL
2 transactions
$26,400
3
BARTELS, ROBERT
3 transactions
$16,500
4
SCHWARTZ, JEFFREY
1 transaction
$13,200
5
STALEY, MICAH D.
1 transaction
$13,200
6
VELDMAN, BERNIE
1 transaction
$13,200
7
BONTRAGER, WILBUR
2 transactions
$13,200
8
GESSNER, DOUG
1 transaction
$6,600
9
SCHWARTZ, MARGARET
1 transaction
$6,600
10
STALEY, NAOMI
1 transaction
$6,600
11
VELDMAN, PAMELA
1 transaction
$6,600
12
MEIJER, MARK
1 transaction
$6,600
13
WALTERS, TAMARA S.
1 transaction
$6,600
14
DODEN, BRENDA
1 transaction
$6,600

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 3 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Davis, Danny K. [D-IL-7]

ID: D000096

Top Contributors

10

1
CONSULATE OF JAMAICA
OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC
$2,500
Jun 30, 2023
2
PLASTY PAC
OrganizationARLINGTON HEIGHTS, IL
$1,000
Jul 1, 2024
3
DLV
OrganizationCHICAGO, IL
$955
Oct 10, 2023
4
AL BOSTAAN SERVICES
OrganizationBRIDGEVIEW, IL
$500
Jun 30, 2023
5
COMMITTEE TO ELECT JUDGE THOMAS MORE DONNELLY
OrganizationCHICAGO, IL
$500
Jun 30, 2023
6
MELISSA FOR CHICAGO
OrganizationCHICAGO, IL
$500
Jun 30, 2023
7
ALLEN, ANDRE
RIGHTEOUS WORKSBUNDING ENG.
IndividualCHICAGO, IL
$3,300
Sep 18, 2023
8
CHEN, YONG
EATONELECTRICAL ENGINEER
IndividualBURBANK, IL
$3,300
Aug 2, 2023
9
CHOPRA, PARAMJIT S.
FIELD MUSEUMFUNDRASING
IndividualGLENVIEW, IA
$3,300
Sep 5, 2023
10
CUCCO, FRANK T
IMPACT NETWORKINGCEO/PARTNER
IndividualKILDEER, IL
$3,300
Aug 30, 2023

Rep. Buchanan, Vern [R-FL-16]

ID: B001260

Top Contributors

10

1
RICHARDS, CHRISTINE
CVPCUST/BUS TRANS
IndividualBARTLETT, TN
$3,300
Oct 28, 2024
2
RICHARDS, DANIEL
DR. CONSULTINGCPA
IndividualBARTLETT, TN
$3,300
Oct 28, 2024
3
GARCIA, MARIO
EMSI - TAMPAPRESIDENT/CEO
IndividualTAMPA, FL
$3,300
Nov 28, 2023
4
BENJAMIN, STEPHEN
VALIDUS SENIOR LIVINGCEO
IndividualODESSA, FL
$3,300
Nov 10, 2023
5
GARCIA, IVIS
HOMEMAKERHOMEMAKER
IndividualTAMPA, FL
$3,300
Nov 28, 2023
6
GARCIA, MARIO
EMSI - TAMPAPRESIDENT/CEO
IndividualTAMPA, FL
$3,300
Nov 28, 2023
7
GARCIA, IVIS
HOMEMAKERHOMEMAKER
IndividualTAMPA, FL
$3,300
Nov 28, 2023
8
JOHNSON, TRAVIS
1607 STRATEGIESFOUNDER
IndividualARLINGTON, VA
$3,300
Dec 6, 2023
9
COPELAND, GERRET
TERREG MANAGEMENT LLCCEO
IndividualSARASOTA, FL
$3,300
Feb 7, 2023
10
COPELAND, KYM
HOMEMAKERHOMEMAKER
IndividualSARASOTA, FL
$3,300
Feb 7, 2023

Rep. Schweikert, David [R-AZ-1]

ID: S001183

Top Contributors

10

1
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationHIGHLAND, CA
$3,300
Dec 31, 2023
2
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationBANNING, CA
$3,300
Mar 20, 2023
3
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationBANNING, CA
$3,300
Mar 20, 2023
4
SALT RIVER PIMA MARICOPA INDIAN COMMUNITY
OrganizationSCOTTSDALE, AZ
$3,300
Mar 31, 2023
5
SALT RIVER PIMA MARICOPA INDIAN COMMUNITY
OrganizationSCOTTSDALE, AZ
$3,300
May 23, 2024
6
WSS
Organization
$3,300
Jul 3, 2024
7
HPUL PROJECT OPERATIONS
OrganizationUPPER LAKE, CA
$3,300
Jun 30, 2023
8
SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA
$3,300
Oct 23, 2024
9
MASHANTUCKET (WESTERN) PEQUOT TRIBE
OrganizationLEDYARD, CT
$3,300
Oct 30, 2024
10
HPUL PROJECT OPERATIONS
OrganizationUPPER LAKE, CA
$2,500
Jul 25, 2024

Donor Network - Rep. Yakym, Rudy [R-IN-2]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 63 nodes and 39 connections (76 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $226,005

Top Donors - Rep. Yakym, Rudy [R-IN-2]

Showing top 21 donors by contribution amount

7 Orgs14 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 3 helped.

  • Section 2(a)(3) mentions connecting foster youth with evidence-based home visiting and support services, which could lead to increased partnerships with hospitals and health systems, potentially benefiting them.

  • +Health Insuranceconfidence 0.70

    The bill aims to improve supports for expectant and parenting youth who have experienced foster care, which may involve increased access to healthcare services, potentially leading to more insurance claims and revenue for health insurers.

  • Section 3 amends the Social Security Act to provide tailored case management and resource coordination services, which could involve partnerships with long-term care providers, potentially benefiting them.

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.

Introduction

Moderate61.8%
Pages: 515-517

— 482 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise sociological understanding of what it means to be a father—not a gender- neutral parent—from social science, psychology, personal testimonies, etc. ADMINISTRATION ON CHILDREN, YOUTH, AND FAMILIES (ACYF) l Allocate funding to strategy programs promoting father involvement or terminate parental rights quickly. ACYF is currently considering different programs to encourage parents, especially fathers, to engage with their children in foster care. While these program ideas and initiatives are still in the early planning stages, promoting responsible parenthood to reintegrate children or at least keep a consistent male figure in the minor’s life is crucial. At the same time, in cases where the father or mother does not make a sincere or serious effort to be involved in the child’s upbringing, termination of parental rights for children in foster care should be swift. OFFICE OF HEAD START (OHS) l Eliminate the Head Start program. Head Start, originally established and funded to support low-income families, is fraught with scandal and abuse. With a budget of more than $11 billion, the program should function to protect and educate minors. Sadly, it has done exactly the opposite. In fact, “approximately 1 in 4 grant recipients had incidents in which children were abused, left unsupervised, or released to an unauthorized person between October 2015 and May 2020.”68 Research has demonstrated that federal Head Start centers, which provide preschool care to children from low-income families, have little or no long-term academic value for children. Given its unaddressed crisis of rampant abuse and lack of positive outcomes, this program should be eliminated along with the entire OHS. At the very least, the program’s COVID-19 vaccine and mask requirements should be rescinded. ADMINISTRATION FOR COMMUNITY LIVING (ACL) l Support palliative care. Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) is legal in 10 states and the District of Columbia. Legalizing PAS is a grave mistake that endangers the weak and vulnerable, corrupts the practice of medicine and the doctor–patient relationship, compromises the family and intergenerational commitments, and betrays human dignity and equality before the law. Instead of embracing PAS, policymakers should focus on the benefits of palliative care, which works to improve a patient’s quality of life by alleviating pain and other distressing symptoms of a serious illness. HHS ACL should survey their programs to ensure that they are supporting vulnerable persons of age or disability and are not facilitating or encouraging participation in PAS.

Introduction

Moderate61.8%
Pages: 515-517

— 482 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise sociological understanding of what it means to be a father—not a gender- neutral parent—from social science, psychology, personal testimonies, etc. ADMINISTRATION ON CHILDREN, YOUTH, AND FAMILIES (ACYF) l Allocate funding to strategy programs promoting father involvement or terminate parental rights quickly. ACYF is currently considering different programs to encourage parents, especially fathers, to engage with their children in foster care. While these program ideas and initiatives are still in the early planning stages, promoting responsible parenthood to reintegrate children or at least keep a consistent male figure in the minor’s life is crucial. At the same time, in cases where the father or mother does not make a sincere or serious effort to be involved in the child’s upbringing, termination of parental rights for children in foster care should be swift. OFFICE OF HEAD START (OHS) l Eliminate the Head Start program. Head Start, originally established and funded to support low-income families, is fraught with scandal and abuse. With a budget of more than $11 billion, the program should function to protect and educate minors. Sadly, it has done exactly the opposite. In fact, “approximately 1 in 4 grant recipients had incidents in which children were abused, left unsupervised, or released to an unauthorized person between October 2015 and May 2020.”68 Research has demonstrated that federal Head Start centers, which provide preschool care to children from low-income families, have little or no long-term academic value for children. Given its unaddressed crisis of rampant abuse and lack of positive outcomes, this program should be eliminated along with the entire OHS. At the very least, the program’s COVID-19 vaccine and mask requirements should be rescinded. ADMINISTRATION FOR COMMUNITY LIVING (ACL) l Support palliative care. Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) is legal in 10 states and the District of Columbia. Legalizing PAS is a grave mistake that endangers the weak and vulnerable, corrupts the practice of medicine and the doctor–patient relationship, compromises the family and intergenerational commitments, and betrays human dignity and equality before the law. Instead of embracing PAS, policymakers should focus on the benefits of palliative care, which works to improve a patient’s quality of life by alleviating pain and other distressing symptoms of a serious illness. HHS ACL should survey their programs to ensure that they are supporting vulnerable persons of age or disability and are not facilitating or encouraging participation in PAS. — 483 — Department of Health and Human Services l Readdress the National Strategy to Support Family Caregivers. While in theory the strategy aims to support family members with duties to care for older family members, the plan is overly focused on racial and “LGBTQ+ equity.” The strategy should be examined to establish an efficient plan to support caregivers and their families. There should also be a review of its COVID-19 policies. HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES ADMINISTRATION (HRSA) l Congress should allow CMS to use the 340B data that HRSA collects rather than having CMS conduct its own survey, especially in view of the U.S. Supreme Court’s American Hospital Association v. Becerra decision.69 The legislation should also create penalties for those who do not respond to HRSA’s data collection. l Legally define the locus of service as where the provider is located during the telehealth visit rather than where the patient is. With such a definition, states could continue to reserve their powers to establish the standards for licensure and scope of practice. The providers could ensure continuity and consistency of care no matter where their patients might move while maintaining the licenses that make the most sense for them. Americans are far more mobile and technologically advanced today than they were when most health care laws were written. Telehealth has become increasingly important, particularly during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. It also has great potential in rural and other areas where there are shortages of health care providers. HRSA’s Office for the Advancement of Telehealth includes a program known as the Licensure Portability Grant Program, which bolsters state efforts to reform licensing laws to maximize telehealth flexibility. HRSA does not have the authority through this office to dictate licensure laws; that power has typically been reserved to the states. However, telehealth across state lines, when permitted, is interstate commerce, which can be regulated by the federal government according to the Constitution. l Restore Trump religious and moral exemptions to the contraceptive mandate (also a CMS rule). HHS should rescind, if finalized, the regulation titled “Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act,” proposed jointly by HHS, Treasury, and Labor.70 This rule proposes to amend Trump-era final rules regarding religious and moral exemptions and accommodations for coverage of certain preventive services under the ACA. Preventive services include contraception, and

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text. A score of 60% or higher indicates meaningful thematic overlap. This does not imply direct causation or intent, but highlights areas where legislation aligns with Project 2025 policy objectives.

Full Policy Text

Related Bills