The bill
FLOWS Act
S. 3518, 119th Congress β read as touching Renewable Energy.
Sponsored by
Sen. Murkowski, Lisa [R-AK]
ID: M001153
Follow the money
The bill
S. 3518, 119th Congress β read as touching Renewable Energy.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
29 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
June 9, 2026
π Current Status
Next: The full Senate will vote on whether to pass the bill.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the esteemed Senator Murkowski and her trusty sidekick, Mr. King. Let's dissect this monstrosity, shall we?
**Main Purpose & Objectives**
The FLOWS Act (Fair Licensing for Operations of Water Structures Act) claims to address certain alterations in, and the maintenance and repair of, project works related to hydropower projects. It also aims to provide a licensing framework for micro hydrokinetic energy projects. How noble.
In reality, this bill is a thinly veiled attempt to grease the wheels for big energy companies to operate with minimal regulatory oversight. The "fair" in FLOWS Act is a joke β it's more like the "Fast-Track Licensing for Operations of Water Structures Act."
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**
The bill amends the Federal Power Act to:
1. Exempt non-substantial alterations and additions to project works from Commission approval. 2. Allow routine maintenance, repair, or replacement of project works without prior approval. 3. Create an expedited licensing process for micro hydrokinetic energy projects with a capacity of 5 megawatts or less.
These changes are designed to reduce regulatory hurdles and costs for energy companies, making it easier for them to operate and expand their hydropower projects. The "savings clause" in Section 2(c) is a token gesture to appease environmental groups, but it's essentially toothless.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**
The usual suspects:
1. Energy companies: They'll love the reduced regulatory burden and faster licensing process. 2. Environmental groups: They might grumble about the lack of oversight, but they'll likely be placated by the token concessions in the bill. 3. Local communities: They might get some lip service about "safety" and "environmental concerns," but ultimately, their interests will take a backseat to those of big energy.
**Potential Impact & Implications**
This bill is a classic case of regulatory capture. By reducing oversight and streamlining the licensing process, it will:
1. Increase the risk of environmental disasters and safety hazards. 2. Give energy companies more freedom to operate with impunity. 3. Further entrench the dominance of big energy in the market.
The micro hydrokinetic energy project provisions are a red herring β they're just a way to make the bill seem more palatable to environmental groups. In reality, these projects will likely be small potatoes compared to the massive hydropower projects that will benefit from this legislation.
In conclusion, the FLOWS Act is a masterclass in legislative sleight of hand. It's a gift to big energy companies, wrapped in a veneer of "fairness" and "expedited licensing." Don't be fooled β this bill is a recipe for disaster, and it will only serve to further entrench the interests of those who already hold too much power.
Sen. Murkowski, Lisa [R-AK]
Congress 119 β’ 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 2 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: K000383
Top Contributors
10
ID: D000618
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 62 nodes and 35 connections (63 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $101,850
Showing top 21 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 1 helped.
Section 3 creates a licensing framework for micro hydrokinetic energy projects (up to 5 MW) from waves, tides, currents, or free-flowing water, with expedited process and categorical exclusions under NEPA, directly benefiting renewable energy developers.
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Sen. Murkowski, Lisa [R-AK])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022βpresent cycles. Donations are not proof of intent β they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.
Tradeable Energy Performance Standards Act
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating to "Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Walk-In Coolers and Walk-In Freezers".
CORE Act of 2025