End Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/9496
Last Updated: September 15, 2026

Sponsored by

Rep. Tenney, Claudia [R-NY-24]

ID: T000478

Follow the money

The bill

End Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act

HR. 9496, 119th Congress.

The sponsor

Rep. Tenney, Claudia [R-NY-24]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$211,508 raised

28 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

55% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of the Treasury" section, p. 730-732 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

September 14, 2026

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed House

🏛️

Senate Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

**Summary of H.R. 9496: End Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act**

**1. Main Purpose & Objectives** The stated purpose of H.R. 9496 is to provide tax relief to U.S. nationals who are unlawfully detained or held hostage abroad by postponing tax deadlines, waiving penalties and interest, and refunding previously paid fines incurred during their captivity. On the surface, it’s a compassionate gesture—freeing hostages from the bureaucratic cruelty of the IRS while they’re imprisoned by foreign regimes. But let’s be honest: this bill isn’t really about mercy. It’s about politicians slapping a bandaid on a gaping wound of foreign policy failure and calling it compassion. The real objective? To look like they’re doing something for hostages without actually securing their release or holding hostile governments accountable. It’s legislative virtue signaling—because admitting we can’t protect our citizens abroad is harder than pretending the IRS is the real villain.

**2. Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill amends the Internal Revenue Code by adding Section 7511, which mandates that the period of unlawful detention or hostage-taking abroad be disregarded for tax purposes. This includes: - Suspending tax deadlines and extending filing/payment timelines. - Waiving interest, penalties, and additional amounts that would otherwise accrue during detention. - Allowing refunds or abatements of penalties and fines already paid prior to official recognition as a hostage or detainee (retroactive relief, with claims process to be established by January 1, 2027). - Requiring the Treasury to update its systems to suspend collection activities and statute expirations for affected individuals. - Mandating interagency coordination: the State Department and Attorney General (via the Hostage Recovery Fusion Cell) must provide Treasury with lists of eligible individuals annually starting in 2027. Spouses and dependents are also covered under the relief provisions. The effective date applies to taxable years ending after enactment.

**3. Affected Parties & Stakeholders** - **Primary Beneficiaries:** U.S. nationals wrongfully detained or held hostage abroad, and their spouses/dependents. A small, tragic group—likely fewer than a few dozen people at any given time. - **Administrative Burden:** The IRS, Treasury Department, State Department, and DOJ must build new data-sharing systems, verify eligibility, and process refunds—creating bureaucratic overhead for a problem that shouldn’t require tax code fixes in the first place. - **Taxpaying Public:** Indirectly affected, as refunded penalties and abated interest represent lost revenue—though the fiscal impact is negligible given the tiny beneficiary pool. - **Politicians:** The real beneficiaries. They get to appear tough on hostage crises and compassionate toward victims without addressing the root causes: inadequate diplomatic leverage, weak deterrence against state-sponsored hostage-taking, or the failure to rescue citizens promptly. - **Lobbyists & Special Interests:** Minimal direct involvement, though defense contractors and security firms may indirectly benefit from increased hostage recovery funding tied to related legislation (like the Levinson Act).

**4. Potential Impact & Implications** - **Practical Impact:** Minimal. The number of Americans held hostage or wrongfully detained abroad at any time is small, so the fiscal and administrative burden is low. The relief is real for those affected, but it treats a symptom (tax penalties) while ignoring the disease (state-sponsored hostage-taking and inadequate federal response). - **Symbolic Impact:** High. This is pure political theater. It lets Congress claim they’re “supporting hostages” while doing nothing to prevent hostage-taking or improve recovery efforts. It’s like giving a cancer patient a free parking pass—nice, but irrelevant to the prognosis. - **Broader Implications:** The bill reinforces a dangerous mindset: that symbolic gestures can substitute for real action. It risks creating a moral hazard where adversaries see hostage-taking as a low-risk tactic, knowing the U.S. response will be more paperwork than pressure. Worse,

Related Topics

Human Rights & Global DevelopmentTaxation & IRS RegulationsForeign Aid & Diplomacy
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Tenney, Claudia [R-NY-24]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$211,508
23 donors
PACs
$65,908
Organizations
$7,000
Committees
$0
Individuals
$138,600
1
WINRED EARMARKS
4 transactions
$65,908
1
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
2 transactions
$3,000
2
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
1 transaction
$2,000
3
SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
1 transaction
$2,000

No committee contributions found

1
TEXTOR, DONALD
1 transaction
$13,200
2
DEGEORGE, JOSEPH R.
2 transactions
$13,200
3
WINE, SCOTT
1 transaction
$6,600
4
LEVY, EDWARD JR.
1 transaction
$6,600
5
KEMMERER, KAREN
1 transaction
$6,600
6
EISEN, JOSH
1 transaction
$6,600
7
WEINSTEIN, ADAM
1 transaction
$6,600
8
CHILDS, JOHN W.
1 transaction
$6,600
9
EMERSON, WILLIAM C.
1 transaction
$6,600
10
HUBBARD, KAREN
1 transaction
$6,600
11
HUBBARD, STANLEY S.
1 transaction
$6,600
12
KENT, WILLIAM B.
1 transaction
$6,600
13
KEMMERER, JOHN
1 transaction
$6,600
14
MCROSTIE, DAPHNE
1 transaction
$6,600
15
VANDERPOOL, WARREN
1 transaction
$6,600
16
SCHWARZMAN, CHRISTINE
1 transaction
$6,600
17
SCHWARZMAN, STEPHEN
1 transaction
$6,600
18
TEXTOR, ELAINE
1 transaction
$6,600
19
REYNOLDS, ED
1 transaction
$6,600

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 2 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Titus, Dina [D-NV-1]

ID: T000468

Top Contributors

27

1
LAS VEGAS PAIUTE TRIBE
OrganizationLAS VEGAS, NV
$3,300
Dec 31, 2023
2
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationLOS ANGELES, CA
$3,300
Feb 1, 2024
3
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationLOS ANGELES, CA
$2,500
Jun 30, 2024
4
BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationLAKESIDE, CA
$1,500
Jun 30, 2023
5
RENO-SPARKS INDIAN COLONY
OrganizationRENO, NV
$1,000
Jun 11, 2024
6
SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA
$1,000
Sep 8, 2023
7
NET2LINK, LLC
OrganizationPEMBROKE PINES, FL
$250
Oct 23, 2024
8
CHANG, RONIE
GOLDEN REAL ESTATE & INVESTMENTS • REALTOR
IndividualLAS VEGAS, NV
$3,300
Nov 2, 2024
9
PRITZKER, JAY
STATE OF ILLINOIS • GOVERNOR
IndividualCHICAGO, IL
$3,300
Oct 18, 2024
10
SCHMIDT, ERIC
HILLSPIRE LLC • MANAGER
IndividualPALO ALTO, CA
$3,300
Oct 23, 2024

Rep. Beyer, Donald S. [D-VA-8]

ID: B001292

Top Contributors

24

1
TUNICA-BILOXI TRIBE OF LA
OrganizationMARKSVILLE, LA
$3,300
Nov 10, 2023
2
TUNICA-BILOXI TRIBE OF LA
OrganizationMARKSVILLE, LA
$1,700
Nov 10, 2023
3
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN
$1,650
Mar 26, 2024
4
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN
$1,650
Jun 7, 2023
5
CAFRITZ, JANE
CALVIN CAFRITZ ENTERPRISES • MANAGER
IndividualWASHINGTON, DC
$3,300
Oct 2, 2024
6
HIRST, THOMSON M
N/A • RETIRED
IndividualALEXANDRIA, VA
$3,300
Oct 11, 2024
7
MURTAGH, PAUL
PRECISION X-RAY INC. • BUSINESS OWNER
IndividualALEXANDRIA, VA
$3,300
Oct 5, 2024
8
TOMPKINS, GRAVES
GENERAL ATLANTIC • FINANCE
IndividualBROOKLYN HGTS, NY
$3,300
Sep 29, 2024
9
MALLOY, GEOFFREY
MALLOY AUTO GROUP • PRESIDENT
IndividualMCLEAN, VA
$3,300
Jul 10, 2024
10
ARNOLD, LAURA
ARNOLD VENTURES • CO-FOUNDER
IndividualHOUSTON, TX
$3,300
Aug 16, 2024

Donor Network - Rep. Tenney, Claudia [R-NY-24]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 62 nodes and 64 connections

Total contributions: $64

Top Donors - Rep. Tenney, Claudia [R-NY-24]

Showing top 23 donors by contribution amount

1 PAC3 Orgs19 Individuals

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of the Treasury

Weak
Vector: 63%
Pages: 730-732AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill provides targeted tax relief for hostages and their families, focusing on humanitarian relief and penalty abatement, while Project 2025's Treasury section emphasizes broad tax reform, reducing business and investment taxes, eliminating certain deductions, and restructuring the IRS. There is minimal thematic overlap, as the bill addresses a narrow humanitarian circumstance rather than the systemic tax policy goals outlined in Project 2025."

Key themes:tax reliefInternal Revenue Servicetax policy

— 697 — Department of the Treasury time for any purpose. This would allow the vast majority of American families to save and invest without facing a punitive double layer of taxation. Entrepreneurship. To encourage entrepreneurship, the business loss limita- tion should be increased to at least $500,000. Businesses should also be allowed to fully carry forward net operating losses. Extra layers of taxes on investment and capital should also be eliminated or reduced. The net investment income surtax and the base erosion anti-abuse tax should be eliminated. The estate and gift tax should be reduced to no higher than 20 percent, and the 2017 tax bill’s temporary increase in the exemption amount from $5.5 million to $12.9 million (adjusted for inflation) should be made permanent.21 The tax on global intangible low-taxed income should be reduced to no higher than 12.5 percent, with the 20 percent haircut on related foreign tax credits reduced or eliminated.22 All non-business tax deductions and exemptions that were temporarily sus- pended by the 2017 tax bill should be permanently repealed, including the bicycle commuting expense exclusion, non-military moving expense deductions, and the miscellaneous itemized deductions.23 The individual state and local tax deduction, which was temporarily capped at $10,000, should be fully repealed. Deductions related to educational expenses should be repealed. Special business tax pref- erences, such as a special deduction for energy-efficient commercial building properties, should be eliminated.24 Wages vs. Benefits. The current tax code has a strong bias that incentivizes businesses to offer employees more generous benefits and lower wages. This limits the freedom of workers and their families to spend their compensation as they see fit—and it can trap workers in their current jobs due to the jobs’ benefit pack- ages. Wage income is taxed under the individual income tax and under the payroll tax. However, most forms of non-wage benefits are wholly exempt from both of these taxes. To reduce this tax bias against wages (as opposed to employee benefits), the next Administration should set a meaningful cap (no higher than $12,000 per year per full-time equivalent employee—and preferably lower) on untaxed benefits that employers can claim as deductions. Employee benefit expenses other than tax-deferred retirement account contributions should count toward the limita- tion, whether offered to specific employees or whether the costs relate to a shared benefit like building gym facilities for employees.25 Tax-deferred retirement con- tributions by employers should not count toward this limitation insofar as they are fully taxable upon distribution. Only a percentage of Health Savings Accounts (HSA) contributions (which are not taxed upon withdrawal) should count toward the limitation.26 The limitation on benefit deductions should not be indexed to increase with inflation.27 Employers should also be denied deductions for health insurance and other benefits provided to employee dependents if the dependents are aged 23 or older. — 698 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Fundamental Tax Reform. Achieving fundamental tax reform offers the prospect of a dramatic improvement in American living standards and an equally dramatic reduction in tax compliance costs. Lobbyists, lawyers, benefit consul- tants, accountants, and tax preparers would see their incomes decline, however. The federal income tax system heavily taxes capital and corporate income and discourages work, savings, and investment. The public finance literature is clear that a consumption tax would minimize government’s distortion of private economic decisions and thus be the least eco- nomically harmful way to raise federal tax revenues.28 There are several forms that a consumption tax could take, including a national sales tax, a business transfer tax, a Hall–Rabushka flat tax,29 or a cash flow tax.30 Supermajority to Raise Taxes. Treasury should support legislation instituting a three-fifths vote threshold in the U.S. House and the Senate to raise income or corporate tax rates to create a wall of protection for the new rate structure. Many states have implemented such a supermajority vote requirement. Tax Competition. Tax competition between states and countries is a positive force for liberty and limited government.31 The Biden Administration, under the direction of Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, has pushed for a global minimum corporate tax that would increase taxation and the size of government in the U.S. and around the world. This attempt to “harmonize” global tax rates is an attempt to create a global tax cartel to quash tax competition and to increase the tax burden globally. The U.S. should not outsource its tax policy to international organizations. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. The Organi- zation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), in conjunction with the European Union, has long tried to end financial privacy and impose regulations on countries with low (or no) income taxes. In fact, on tax, environmental, corpo- rate governance and employment issues, the OECD has become little more than a taxpayer-funded left-wing think tank and lobbying organization.32 The United States provides about one-fifth of OECD’s funding.33 The U.S. should end its finan- cial support and withdraw from the OECD. TAX ADMINISTRATION The Internal Revenue Service is a poorly managed, utterly unresponsive and increasingly politicized agency, and has been for at least two decades. It is time for meaningful reform to improve the efficiency and fairness of tax administration, better protect taxpayer rights, and achieve greater transparency and accountability. A substantial number of the problems attributed to the IRS are actually a function of congressional action that has made the Internal Revenue Code ridiculously complex, imposed tremendous administrative burdens on both the public and the IRS, and given massive non-tax missions to the IRS. But the culture, administrative practices, and management at the IRS need to change.

Department of Homeland Security

Minimal
Vector: 64%
Pages: 174-176AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill provides tax relief to American hostages and their families, focusing on humanitarian and financial equity, while the Project 2025 DHS section emphasizes immigration enforcement, border security, detention expansion, and internal security operations—there is no substantive thematic or policy overlap between the two."

— 142 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Most of the foregoing can be accomplished rapidly and effectively through exec- utive action that is both lawful and appropriate. Additionally, ICE should clarify who is responsible for enforcing its criminal and civil authorities. It should also remove self-imposed limitations on its nationwide jurisdiction. l Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) Special Agents in the 1811 series should enforce Title 8 and 18 crimes as the biggest part of their portfolio. Alien smuggling, trafficking, and cross-border crime as defined under Title 85 and Title 186 should be the focus of ICE operations. l The role of ICE Deportation Officers should be clarified. ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) should be identified as being primarily responsible for enforcing civil immigration regulations, including the civil arrest, detention, and removal of immigration violators anywhere in the United States, without warrant where appropriate, subject only to the civil warrant requirements of the INA where appropriate. l All ICE memoranda identifying “sensitive zones” where ICE personnel are prohibited from operating should be rescinded. Rely on the good judgment of officers in the field to avoid inappropriate situations. l To maximize the efficient use of its resources, ICE should make full use of existing Expedited Removal (ER) authorities. The agency has limited the use of ER to eligible aliens apprehended within 100 miles of the border. This is not a statutory requirement. New Policies U.S. national security and public safety interests would be well-served if ICE were to be combined with CBP and USCIS, as mentioned above. Additionally, ICE/ HSI, along with CBP, should be full participants in the Intelligence Community. The use of Blackies Warrants should be operationalized within ICE. These civil search warrants are commonly used for worksite enforcement when agents have probable cause that illegal aliens are employed at a business. This would stream- line investigations. Safeguarding Americans will require not just securing the border, but con- tinuous vetting and investigations of many aliens who exploited President Biden’s open border for potentially nefarious purposes, including some Afghan evacuees sent directly to the U.S. during America’s disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan. — 143 — Department of Homeland Security Budget l Congress should mandate and fund additional bed space for alien detainees. ICE should be funded for a significant increase in detention space, raising the daily available number of beds to 100,000. l Congress should fund ICE for at least 20,000 ERO officers and 5,000 Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) attorneys. U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS) U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is the agency tasked with administering the legal immigration and certain temporary visa programs. Needed Reforms Since January 2021, USCIS’s priorities have been misaligned, and this has trans- formed it into an open-borders agency, ignoring the critical role that it plays in national security, public safety, and safeguarding the integrity of our immigration system. USCIS should be returned to operating as a screening and vetting agency. Regulatory efforts have focused on easing asylum eligibility in a manner that is guaranteed to exacerbate asylum fraud as people surge at the border. Emphasis also has been placed on removing legal barriers to immigration, such as the use of public benefits. These actions violate statutes, erode congressional intent, and provide a significant magnet for continued illegal immigration. Additionally, USCIS resources have been misappropriated to focus more on creating and expanding large-scale parole and temporary status programs that violate the law and are otherwise contrary to congressional intent instead of focus- ing on a more secure and efficient process for those who are seeking benefits. The ever-increasing number of applications filed has made it difficult to vet applica- tions adequately for eligibility, fraud, and specific national security and public safety problems. The Fraud Detection and National Security Directorate (FDNS) is currently a small directorate with assigned officers reporting through the chain of command in the field, and this has led to stovepiping, lack of coordination in national policy, and inconsistencies throughout the agency. To prioritize vetting and fraud detection, FDNS should undergo a structural shift focused on direct reporting from the field to headquarters, reclassification of leadership, and FDNS directives taking prece- dence over those of other component entities. Correcting the current misalignment of agency priorities and resources should begin with this primary shift in focus to vetting and fraud detection. These actions would reform the agency, returning it to its screening and vetting mission in protecting the homeland. Other structural changes should include reimplementation of the USCIS denat- uralization unit—an effort to maintain integrity in the system by identifying and

Department of Homeland Security

Minimal
Vector: 63%
Pages: 183-185AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on tax relief for American hostages and wrongfully detained individuals abroad, which is unrelated to the Project 2025 DHS policy objectives centered on immigration enforcement, border security, and restricting prosecutorial discretion in immigration cases."

— 150 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 1. Congress should unequivocally authorize state and local law enforcement to participate in immigration and border security actions in compliance with Arizona v. United States.11 2. Congress should require compliance with immigration detainers to the maximum extent consistent with the Tenth Amendment and set financial disincentives for jurisdictions that implement either official or unofficial sanctuary policies. l Prosecutorial discretion. Congress should restrict the authority for prosecutorial discretion to eliminate it as a “catch-all” excuse for limiting immigration enforcement. l Mandatory detention. Congress should eliminate ambiguous discretionary language in Title 8 that aliens “may” be detained and clarify that aliens “shall” be detained. This language, which contrasts with other “shall detain” language in statute, creates unhelpful ambiguity and allows the executive branch to ignore the will of Congress. Regulations l Withdraw Biden Administration regulations and reissue new regulations in the following areas: 1. Credible Fear/Asylum Jurisdiction for Border Crossers. 2. Public Charge. l T-Visa and U-Visa reform. Unless and until T and U visas are repealed, each program needs to be reformed to ensure that only legitimate victims of trafficking and crimes who are actively providing significant material assistance to law enforcement are eligible for spots in the queue. l Repeal TPS designations. l H-1B reform. Transform the program into an elite mechanism exclusively to bring in the “best and brightest” at the highest wages while simultaneously ensuring that U.S. workers are not being disadvantaged by the program. H-1B is a means only to supplement the U.S. economy and to keep companies competitive, not to depress U.S. labor markets artificially in certain industries. — 151 — Department of Homeland Security l Employment authorization. Along with the legislative proposal, take regulatory action to limit the classes of aliens eligible for work authorization. Executive Orders l Pathways for border crossers 1. Direct the Department of State and the Department of Homeland Security to reinstate Asylum Cooperative Agreements with Northern Triangle Countries immediately. 2. Recommence negotiations with Mexico to fully implement the Remain in Mexico Protocols. 3. Reinstate, to the extent possible, expedited pathways with full credible fear/immigration court process (PACR and HARP). 4. Prohibit the use of Notices to Report, the use of any funds for travel into the interior of the United States, and government flights or transportation for aliens. 5. Mandate that ICE use all detention space in full compliance with Section 235 of the INA, issue weekly reports on detention capacity, and provide authority for low-level temporary capacity (for example, tents) once permanent space is full. 6. Eliminate the use of ATD for border crossers except in rare cases and only with the explicit authority of the Secretary. 7. Prohibit the use of parole except in matters that are certified by the Secretary of Homeland Security as requiring action for humanitarian or significant public benefit reasons, and prohibit the use of parole in any categorical circumstance. l Enforcement 1. Restrict prosecutorial discretion to eliminate it as a “catch-all” excuse for limiting immigration enforcement. 2. Mandate the use of E-Verify for anyone doing business with the government.

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Full Policy Text

Related Bills