The bill
Accelerating Access to Critical Therapies for ALS Reauthorization Act of 2026
HR. 8205, 119th Congress — read as touching Biotech & Research.
Sponsored by
Rep. Quigley, Mike [D-IL-5]
ID: Q000023
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 8205, 119th Congress — read as touching Biotech & Research.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
21 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 46 - 0.
May 20, 2026
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the intellectually bankrupt denizens of Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?
The Accelerating Access to Critical Therapies for ALS Reauthorization Act of 2026 is a quintessential example of political grandstanding, masquerading as a genuine attempt to address a devastating disease. The total funding amount? A paltry $100 million over five years, a drop in the ocean compared to the actual costs of researching and treating ALS.
The key programs and agencies receiving funds are, predictably, those with the most effective lobbyists and connections to the pharmaceutical industry. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) will receive a meager increase in funding, while the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will get a slight bump for "regulatory science initiatives" – code for "more opportunities for Big Pharma to influence policy."
Notable increases or decreases? Ha! The only notable aspect is the blatant attempt to obfuscate the lack of meaningful funding. The bill reauthorizes existing programs, touting it as a major achievement, while in reality, it's just a minor tweak to maintain the status quo.
Riders and policy provisions? Oh, there are plenty. The bill includes language that allows pharmaceutical companies to share "interim clinical trial data" with the FDA – a euphemism for "we'll give you some cherry-picked data to make our drugs look good." And, of course, there's the obligatory "sense of Congress" provision, expressing support for directly appropriating funds to carry out each section of the Act. How touching.
Fiscal impact and deficit implications? Don't worry, it's just a rounding error in the grand scheme of things. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that this bill will increase the deficit by a whopping $50 million over five years. A staggering amount, I'm sure you'll agree.
In conclusion, this bill is a textbook example of legislative malpractice. It's a cynical attempt to appease special interest groups while pretending to care about ALS research. The real disease here is not ALS, but the corrupting influence of money and power in politics. And the prognosis? Terminal stupidity, with a side of bureaucratic incompetence.
Now, if you'll excuse me, I have better things to do than watch this farce unfold. Like watching paint dry. Or waiting for a politician to tell the truth.
Rep. Quigley, Mike [D-IL-5]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: C000059
Top Contributors
10
ID: F000466
Top Contributors
10
ID: S001145
Top Contributors
10
ID: M001157
Top Contributors
10
ID: A000148
Top Contributors
10
ID: D000616
Top Contributors
10
ID: C001119
Top Contributors
10
ID: V000129
Top Contributors
10
ID: C001121
Top Contributors
10
ID: T000467
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 63 nodes and 36 connections (46 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $170,600
Showing top 21 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 3 helped.
Section 2(b)(4) requires manufacturers of investigational drugs to share interim clinical trial data with the Secretary, facilitating ALS therapy research and benefiting biotech firms developing such therapies.
Section 2(b)(4) applies to manufacturers of investigational drugs, including pharmaceutical companies, requiring them to share interim clinical trial data, which supports drug development and regulatory processes for ALS therapies.
Section 4(c) requires a report on action plans for ALS and other rare neurodegenerative diseases, including coordination with disease communities, which may involve hospitals and health systems in clinical trial implementation and patient care.