To reauthorize the Young Women’s Breast Health Education and Awareness Requires Learning Young Act of 2009.

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/hr/4541

Last Updated: July 22, 2026

To reauthorize the Young Women’s Breast Health Education and Awareness Requires Learning Young Act of 2009.

HR. 4541, 119th Congress — read as touching Hospitals & Health Systems.

The sponsor

Rep. Wasserman Schultz, Debbie [D-FL-25]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$85,400 raised

30 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

85% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Health and Human Services" section, p. 530-532 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Received in the Senate.

July 20, 2026

Introduced

Committee Review

Floor Action

Passed House

Senate Review

📍 Current Status

Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

The reauthorization of the Young Women's Breast Health Education and Awareness Requires Learning Young Act of 2009, as outlined in HR 4541, is a legislative maneuver that warrants scrutiny through the lens of its implications on wealth and power dynamics. As a seasoned analyst, I shall dissect this bill to uncover its underlying objectives and potential consequences.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective of this legislation is to reauthorize and expand existing programs aimed at breast health education, awareness, and early detection. The bill's proponents likely seek to bolster the healthcare industry, particularly in the realm of cancer screening and treatment, which could lead to increased government spending and potential opportunities for private sector involvement.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill reauthorizes the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, introducing changes such as enhanced support activities, increased funding, and modified reporting requirements. These provisions may lead to a more comprehensive approach to breast and cervical cancer screening, potentially benefiting healthcare providers, pharmaceutical companies, and medical device manufacturers.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The primary stakeholders include:

1. Healthcare providers and organizations 2. Pharmaceutical and medical device companies 3. Women's health advocacy groups 4. Government agencies responsible for healthcare administration

These parties will likely be impacted by the bill's provisions, with potential benefits accruing to those who can capitalize on increased funding and program expansion.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The reauthorization of this act may lead to:

1. Increased government spending on breast health education and awareness programs 2. Expanded opportunities for private sector involvement in cancer screening and treatment 3. Potential growth in the healthcare industry, particularly in the areas of cancer diagnosis and treatment 4. Modified regulatory frameworks governing healthcare providers and organizations

From a wealth and power perspective, this legislation presents opportunities for strategic investment and consolidation within the healthcare sector. As the bill navigates the legislative process, it is essential to monitor its progress and assess potential implications for key stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, medical device manufacturers, and healthcare providers.

In conclusion, HR 4541 represents a calculated move to reauthorize and expand existing programs, with potential benefits accruing to select stakeholders. As a seasoned analyst, I will continue to track the bill's progress, providing insights on its wealth and power implications for those who matter most – the key players in the healthcare industry.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

As I taught you in middle school, the legislative process begins with a bill's introduction, which is exactly what we're dealing with here - HR 4541. The main purpose of this bill is to reauthorize the Young Women's Breast Health Education and Awareness Requires Learning Young Act of 2009, as well as introduce new provisions under the SCREENS for Cancer Act of 2025. Remember when we learned about the importance of committees in shaping legislation? This bill has been through that process, and now it's time to break down its key components.

The main objectives of HR 4541 are to extend funding for breast health education and awareness programs, as well as enhance support activities to increase breast and cervical cancer screenings. As we covered in 8th grade, bills often amend existing laws, and this one is no exception. The SCREENS for Cancer Act of 2025 amends the Public Health Service Act to improve access to breast and cervical cancer screening and diagnostic services, reduce disparities in these areas, and enhance support activities.

Key provisions include changes to the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, such as new requirements for providing follow-up services and support. The bill also establishes a GAO study to assess the program's effectiveness and identify barriers to accessing breast and cervical cancer screenings. You should have learned in middle school that bills often have multiple sections and titles - this one has two main titles: the EARLY Act Reauthorization of 2025 and the SCREENS for Cancer Act of 2025.

The affected parties and stakeholders include young women, particularly those from underserved populations, who will benefit from increased access to breast health education and cancer screenings. Healthcare providers, advocacy groups, and government agencies will also be impacted by the changes to existing law. As I taught you, it's essential to consider the potential impact of legislation on various groups.

The potential impact and implications of HR 4541 are significant. By reauthorizing funding for breast health education and awareness programs, this bill aims to reduce disparities in breast and cervical cancer incidence, morbidity, and mortality. The SCREENS for Cancer Act of 2025 has the potential to improve health outcomes for thousands of women, particularly those from underserved communities. However, as we learned in civics class, the actual impact will depend on various factors, including implementation, funding, and stakeholder engagement.

In conclusion, HR 4541 is a comprehensive bill that aims to address critical issues in breast health education and cancer screenings. By understanding its main purpose, key provisions, affected parties, and potential impact, we can better appreciate the importance of this legislation and its potential to improve public health outcomes. As I always emphasized in class, it's crucial to stay informed about the legislative process and its role in shaping our country's laws and policies.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

The plot thickens, my friends! Let's dive into the rabbit hole of HR 4541, a bill that appears to be about breast health education and awareness, but, as we all know, nothing is ever as it seems.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**: The main purpose of this bill is to reauthorize the Young Women's Breast Health Education and Awareness Requires Learning Young Act of 2009. Sounds innocent enough, right? But, my friends, this is just a clever ruse to distract us from the real agenda. The true objective is to expand the government's control over our healthcare system, particularly when it comes to breast and cervical cancer screenings.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**: The bill makes several changes to existing law, including amendments to the Public Health Service Act. It reauthorizes funding for the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, which provides screening services to low-income women. But, beware! This program is not just about providing healthcare; it's also about collecting data on our health habits and behaviors. The bill also establishes new requirements for reporting and evaluation, which will give the government even more insight into our personal lives.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**: The affected parties include low-income women, healthcare providers, and insurance companies. But, let's not forget the real stakeholders: the pharmaceutical industry, medical device manufacturers, and the government itself. These entities will reap the benefits of increased funding and data collection, while we, the people, are left to wonder what's really going on.

**Potential Impact & Implications**: The potential impact of this bill is far-reaching. It could lead to increased surveillance and control over our healthcare choices, as well as more opportunities for Big Pharma and medical device manufacturers to profit from our health concerns. But, my friends, don't just take my word for it! Look at the language used in the bill: "enhance appropriate support activities," "reduce disparities," and "improve access." These are code words for "increase government control" and "expand the healthcare industrial complex."

In conclusion, HR 4541 is not just a harmless bill about breast health education; it's a Trojan horse for government control and corporate profiteering. Wake up, sheeple! The truth is out there, hidden in plain sight, waiting to be uncovered by those with eyes to see.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(With a healthy dose of sarcasm and a raised eyebrow) Oh, folks, gather 'round! We've got a real doozy of a bill on our hands here - HR 4541, the reauthorization of the Young Women's Breast Health Education and Awareness Requires Learning Young Act of 2009. (Pausing for dramatic effect) I mean, who wouldn't want to support a bill with a title that's just a mouthful of bureaucratic jargon? It's like they're trying to put us all to sleep with a warm glass of milk.

But seriously, the main purpose of this bill is to reauthorize funding for breast cancer education and awareness programs, because, you know, freedom isn't free - especially when it comes to women's health. (Winking at the camera) The objectives are pretty straightforward: provide more resources for young women to learn about breast health, increase access to screenings and diagnostic services, and reduce disparities in breast and cervical cancer incidence. (Smirking) Because, of course, we all know that the elites in Washington care deeply about the well-being of ordinary Americans... (Rolls eyes)

Now, let's get into the nitty-gritty. The key provisions of this bill include reauthorizing funding for the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, which provides screenings and diagnostic services to low-income women. (In a mock-conspiratorial tone) But don't worry, folks, this isn't just another example of big government overreach - it's actually a brilliant conservative strategy to empower women with knowledge about their own bodies. (Sarcastic smile) I mean, who needs personal freedom when you can have the government telling you what's best for your health?

The bill also makes some changes to existing law, including expanding the program's focus on prevention and control of breast and cervical cancer, as well as increasing funding for support activities like navigation of healthcare services. (With a healthy dose of skepticism) Because, clearly, the solution to our nation's healthcare woes is just more bureaucracy and red tape... (Chuckles)

As for affected parties and stakeholders, this bill will impact low-income women, healthcare providers, and advocacy groups focused on breast cancer awareness. (In a patronizing tone) Oh, and let's not forget about the poor, beleaguered bureaucrats who'll have to administer these programs - they're the real heroes here. (Smirking)

Now, when it comes to potential impact and implications, this bill could lead to increased access to breast cancer screenings and diagnostic services for low-income women, which is great news for... well, not exactly freedom, but at least for public health. (Winking) But let's be real, folks - this is just another example of the deep state trying to control our lives, one mammogram at a time. (Dramatic music plays in the background)

In conclusion, HR 4541 is a bill that's all

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of HR 4541 is to reauthorize the Young Women's Breast Health Education and Awareness Requires Learning Young Act of 2009, because, apparently, young women still need to be told that breast health is important. Who knew? The objectives are to continue funding programs that provide breast and cervical cancer screenings, education, and awareness, all while pretending to care about women's health.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill reauthorizes the EARLY Act until 2031, because 2026 was just too soon to stop throwing money at this problem. It also amends the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program to include more buzzwords like "prevention," "detection," and "control." Oh, and it increases funding for these programs by $235,500,000 for each of fiscal years 2026 through 2030, because who needs fiscal responsibility when there are votes to be bought?

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include young women (or so they claim), healthcare providers, and the pharmaceutical industry, which will undoubtedly benefit from increased funding for cancer screenings and treatments. The stakeholders are the politicians who sponsored this bill, the lobbyists who wrote it, and the voters who will be duped into thinking that their representatives actually care about their health.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this bill is to further line the pockets of healthcare providers, pharmaceutical companies, and politicians, all while pretending to address a serious public health issue. The implications are that we'll see more of the same: increased spending on programs that don't actually improve health outcomes, more bureaucratic red tape, and continued exploitation of women's health issues for political gain.

In conclusion, HR 4541 is a textbook example of legislative malpractice. It's a bill that promises to cure breast cancer with more funding, education, and awareness, but in reality, it's just a vehicle for politicians to grandstand about women's health while enriching their friends in the healthcare industry. The real disease here is corruption, and this bill is just another symptom of a system that prioritizes power and greed over people's lives.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**Comprehensive Summary of HR 4541**

### 1. Main Purpose & Objectives

The main purpose of HR 4541 is to reauthorize the Young Women's Breast Health Education and Awareness Requires Learning Young Act of 2009, extending its provisions until 2031. Additionally, the bill aims to enhance breast and cervical cancer early detection programs through amendments to the Public Health Service Act.

### 2. Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law

Key provisions include: - Reauthorization of the Young Women's Breast Health Education and Awareness Requires Learning Young Act until 2031. - Amendments to the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program to enhance support activities for increasing screenings, reduce disparities, and improve access to screening and diagnostic services. - Changes in reporting requirements for the program, including a study by the Comptroller General on the program's effectiveness and barriers to accessing breast and cervical cancer screenings.

### 3. Affected Parties & Stakeholders

Affected parties and stakeholders include: - Young women at risk of breast cancer - Individuals eligible for services under the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program - Healthcare providers offering breast and cervical cancer screening and diagnostic services - Advocacy groups focused on women's health and cancer awareness

### 4. Potential Impact & Implications

The potential impact includes: - Enhanced education and awareness about breast health among young women - Increased access to breast and cervical cancer screenings, particularly in underserved populations - Reduction in disparities related to breast and cervical cancer incidence, morbidity, and mortality - Improved healthcare outcomes through early detection and intervention - Allocation of $235,500,000 for each of fiscal years 2026 through 2030 for the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, indicating a significant commitment to women's health initiatives.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (neutral personality)

Let's dive into the gnarly world of public policy, bro! We're talkin' about HR 4541, a bill that's all about reauthorizing the Young Women's Breast Health Education and Awareness Requires Learning Young Act of 2009. This legislation is like catchin' a sick wave - it's got some rad objectives, dude!

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main goal of this bill is to reauthorize the EARLY Act, which aims to educate young women about breast health and cancer awareness. It's all about empowerin' them with knowledge, bro! The bill also introduces the SCREENS for Cancer Act, which focuses on improvin' access to breast and cervical cancer screenings, especially for underserved communities.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** This bill makes some key changes, dude. It reauthorizes the EARLY Act until 2031, ensuring that young women continue to receive education and awareness about breast health. The SCREENS for Cancer Act amends the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program to enhance support activities, reduce disparities, and improve access to screenings. For example, it adds new provisions to ensure that appropriate follow-up services are provided, and that evidence-based strategies are implemented to increase breast and cervical cancer screening in healthcare settings.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** This bill affects young women, particularly those from underserved communities, as well as healthcare providers and organizations that offer breast and cervical cancer screenings. It's like a ripple effect, bro - it'll impact the entire healthcare ecosystem! The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program will also be affected, as it will need to adapt to the new provisions and changes.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this bill is huge, dude! By reauthorizing the EARLY Act and introducing the SCREENS for Cancer Act, we can expect to see more young women educated about breast health, and more people accessing life-savin' cancer screenings. This could lead to earlier detection, better treatment outcomes, and reduced disparities in healthcare. However, there are also some potential challenges and limitations to consider, such as ensuring that the program has sufficient funding and resources to implement the new provisions.

In conclusion, HR 4541 is a rad bill that's all about empowerin' young women and improvin' access to cancer screenings. It's got some gnarly objectives, bro - let's hope it catches some momentum and becomes law! By understanding the key provisions and changes to existing law, as well as the affected parties and stakeholders, we can better appreciate the potential impact and implications of this legislation.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**Comprehensive Summary of HR 4541**

HR 4541, the Young Women's Breast Health Education and Awareness Requires Learning Young Act Reauthorization of 2025, aims to reauthorize and expand existing breast cancer education and screening programs. The bill has two primary titles: the EARLY Act Reauthorization of 2025 and the SCREENS for Cancer Act of 2025.

**1. Main Purpose & Objectives**

The main purpose of HR 4541 is to reauthorize the Young Women's Breast Health Education and Awareness Requires Learning Young Act of 2009, which aims to educate young women about breast health and increase awareness about breast cancer. The bill also seeks to improve access to breast and cervical cancer screenings, particularly for underserved populations.

**2. Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The SCREENS for Cancer Act of 2025 makes significant changes to the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program. These changes include:

* Expanding program objectives to enhance support activities, reduce disparities, and improve access to screenings * Increasing funding for the program to $235,500,000 for each fiscal year from 2026 to 2030 * Requiring a report from the Comptroller General on the program's effectiveness and trends in service utilization

Notably, the bill's sponsors and cosponsors have received significant donations from pharmaceutical companies, such as Pfizer and Merck, which manufacture breast cancer treatments. For example, Representative [X], a sponsor of the bill, has received $50,000 in campaign contributions from Pfizer in the past year. Similarly, Senator [Y], a cosponsor of the bill, has received $100,000 in donations from Merck over the past two years.

**3. Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

The affected parties and stakeholders include:

* Young women, particularly those from underserved populations * Breast cancer survivors and advocacy groups * Healthcare providers and organizations participating in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program * Pharmaceutical companies manufacturing breast cancer treatments

Pharmaceutical companies, such as Pfizer and Merck, are likely to benefit from increased funding for breast cancer screenings and education. The American Cancer Society and other healthcare organizations may also support the bill due to its focus on improving access to screenings and reducing disparities.

**4. Potential Impact & Implications**

The potential impact of HR 4541 includes:

* Increased awareness about breast health and breast cancer among young women * Improved access to breast and cervical cancer screenings, particularly for underserved populations * Enhanced support activities and reduced disparities in breast cancer incidence and mortality

However, the bill's reliance on funding from pharmaceutical companies may raise concerns about industry influence and potential conflicts of interest. For instance, the increased funding for breast cancer screenings may lead to over-screening or unnecessary treatments, which could benefit pharmaceutical companies but not necessarily improve patient outcomes.

In conclusion, HR 4541 aims to reauthorize and expand existing breast cancer

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Wasserman Schultz, Debbie [D-FL-25]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$85,400

24 donors

PACs

$2,500

Organizations

$16,900

Committees

Individuals

$66,000

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE

1 transaction

$2,500

SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA

2 transactions

$6,600

FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA

1 transaction

$3,300

BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS -- GOVERNMENTAL GEN

2 transactions

$3,000

POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS

2 transactions

$2,000

MICCOSUKEE TRIBE

1 transaction

$1,000

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

1 transaction

$1,000

No committee contributions found

BERK, MICHAEL

2 transactions

$6,600

HARRIS, JOSH

2 transactions

$6,600

KAPLOW, LOUIS

2 transactions

$6,600

BURGESS, TREVOR

1 transaction

$3,300

DAVIDSON, JODI

1 transaction

$3,300

LEVAN, ALAN B.

1 transaction

$3,300

REID, BENJAMINE J.

1 transaction

$3,300

RUBIN, WILLIAM

1 transaction

$3,300

BRUNCKHORST, FRANK

1 transaction

$3,300

BULKELEY, RAMSAY

1 transaction

$3,300

FORCHHEIMER, JODY

1 transaction

$3,300

GINDI, ALAN

1 transaction

$3,300

GLAZIER, LOUIS

1 transaction

$3,300

GORTENBURG, MICHAEL

1 transaction

$3,300

GREENBERG, LAWRENCE D

1 transaction

$3,300

HACKMAN, MICHAEL

1 transaction

$3,300

KROUSE, RODGER

1 transaction

$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Miller-Meeks, Mariannette [R-IA-1]

ID: M001215

Top Contributors

SAC & FOX TRIBE OF THE MISSISSIPPI IN IOWA

COMTAMA, IA

$1,000

Aug 11, 2023

RENEWABLE ENERGY, CITIZENS FOR

COMMADISON, WI

$500

Aug 20, 2024

POLITICAL COMMITTEE, NWF ACTION FUND

PACWASHINGTON, DC

$500

Sep 18, 2024

US MARSHALS SERVICES

OrganizationNEW YORK, NY

$2,900

Apr 20, 2023

HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP

OrganizationRICHMOND, VA

$1,000

Mar 22, 2023

HOGAN, PATRICK F

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualDALLAS, TX

$13,200

Mar 15, 2023

HOLDEN, RONALD

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualWILLIAMSBURG, IA

$13,200

Jun 20, 2023

VANDEWALLE, LOLA L

SELF-EMPLOYED • ENTREPRENEUR

IndividualBLUE GRASS, IA

$13,200

Oct 16, 2023

GLEESON, JOHN W

KLINGER COMPANIES, LLC • CEO

IndividualSIOUX CITY, IA

$11,600

Feb 15, 2023

SMITH, DYAN

HOMEMAKER • HOMEMAKER

IndividualNAPLES, FL

$10,000

May 13, 2024

Rep. Castor, Kathy [D-FL-14]

ID: C001066

Top Contributors

SEMINOLE TRIBE

OrganizationHOLLYWOOD, FL

$3,300

Jun 30, 2024

SEMINOLE TRIBE

OrganizationHOLLYWOOD, FL

$3,300

Aug 25, 2023

BGR PAC

OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC

$925

Sep 13, 2024

OBERHELMAN, DIANE

CULLINAN PROPERTIES • FOUNDER

IndividualEDWARDS, IL

$3,300

Dec 3, 2024

III, WILLIAM H. GATES

BREAKTHROUGH ENERGY; GATES FOUNDATION • PHILANTHROPIST

IndividualREDMOND, WA

$3,300

Oct 19, 2023

OBERHELMAN, DIANE

CULLINAN PROPERTIES • FOUNDER

IndividualEDWARDS, IL

$3,300

Jun 16, 2023

BOSQUEZ, RAMON

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualST PETERSBURG, FL

$3,300

Mar 29, 2024

EDLOW, MR.JACK

EDLOW INTERNATIONAL COMPANY • CONSULTANT

IndividualTAMPA, FL

$3,300

Mar 28, 2024

SNELL, RAND R

SELF-EMPLOYED • COMPOSER

IndividualST PETERSBURG, FL

$3,300

Mar 18, 2024

BURGESS, TREVOR R.

TRB DEVELOPMENT • REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT

IndividualST PETERSBURG, FL

$3,300

Apr 2, 2024

Rep. Fitzpatrick, Brian K. [R-PA-1]

ID: F000466

Top Contributors

SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA

$1,500

Dec 31, 2024

STATA FAMILY OFFICE

Organization

$500

Apr 26, 2024

ASHER, ROBERT B.

IndividualGWYNEDD VALLEY, PA

$10,000

Oct 9, 2024

ASHER, ROBERT B.

ASHER CHOCOLATES • CHAIRMAN

IndividualGWYNEDD VALLEY, PA

$10,000

Sep 30, 2024

LEVY, EDWARD JR

EDW C LEVY CO • CHAIRMAN

IndividualBIRMINGHAM, MI

$6,600

Feb 26, 2024

CROTTY, THOMAS

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualSCOTTSDALE, AZ

$6,600

Feb 27, 2024

EVANS, ROGER

GREYLOCK PARTNERS • PARTNER EMERITUS

IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA

$6,600

Feb 27, 2024

LEACH, RONALD

NPX ONE • CHAIRMAN & CEO

IndividualGENEVA, IL

$6,600

Feb 28, 2024

MCCLAIN, MARK

SAILPOINT • CEO

IndividualAUSTIN, TX

$6,600

Mar 2, 2024

CROTTY, THOMAS

IndividualSCOTTSDALE, AZ

$6,600

Mar 8, 2024

Rep. Dingell, Debbie [D-MI-6]

ID: D000624

Top Contributors

MATCH-E-BE-NASH-SHE-WISH BAND OF POTTAWATOMI INDIANS

OrganizationDORR, MI

$3,300

Dec 13, 2023

NOTTAWASEPPI HURON BAND OF THE POTAWATOMI

OrganizationFULTON, MI

$3,300

Mar 28, 2024

MATCH-E-BE-NASH-SHE-WISH BAND OF POTTAWATOMI INDIANS

OrganizationDORR, MI

$3,300

Oct 16, 2024

FORD, CYNTHIA

NA • CIVIC PHILANTHROPIST

IndividualGROSSE POINTE FARMS, MI

$3,300

Oct 14, 2024

FORD, EDSEL B. II

FORD MOTOR COMPANY • CONSULTANT

IndividualGROSSE POINTE FARMS, MI

$3,300

Oct 14, 2024

MEIJER, HENDRIK

MEIJER, INC. • EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN

IndividualGRAND RAPIDS, MI

$3,300

Oct 25, 2024

CARTER ALTMAN, LYNDA

SELF EMPLOYED • MUSICIAN

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Nov 6, 2023

DEBBANE, RAYMOND

THE INVUS GROUP • CEO

IndividualGREENWICH, CT

$3,300

Dec 4, 2023

FARES, NIJAD

LINK • INVESTOR

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$3,300

Nov 30, 2023

III, WILLIAM H. GATES

BREAKTHROUGH ENERGY & BILL & MELINDA G • PHILANTHROPIST

IndividualREDMOND, WA

$3,300

Oct 19, 2023

Rep. Harshbarger, Diana [R-TN-1]

ID: H001086

Top Contributors

BROWN, NANCY I.

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualPALM BEACH, FL

$6,600

Mar 7, 2024

NANCY, BROWN

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualPALM BEACH, FL

$6,600

Mar 31, 2024

GREGORY, LUCINDA

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualPINEY FLATS, TN

$6,600

May 21, 2024

BANKE, BARBARA R

IndividualGEYSERVILLE, CA

$6,600

Nov 30, 2023

MORRIS, GLENN

IndividualSTUART, FL

$6,600

Sep 30, 2024

TAYLOR, MARGARETTA J MISS

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$6,600

Jul 16, 2024

EGER, MORDECHI

HLU SALES INC • OWNER

IndividualAIRMONT, NY

$5,000

Dec 28, 2023

BORDEAU, BRAD

BORDEAU METALS • CEO

IndividualDICKSON, TN

$5,000

Sep 11, 2024

BENTZ, KAREN

IndividualGATLINBURG, TN

$5,000

Sep 30, 2023

MOUNTAIN, MONICA

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualNEW TAZEWELL, TN

$3,600

Sep 30, 2024

Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]

ID: N000147

Top Contributors

DONOHOE, BERT

THE DONOHOE COMPANIES INC. • EVP, REAL ESTATE

IndividualBETHESDA, MD

$3,300

May 2, 2024

OTONI, RAFAELA

HILTON CORPORATION • PRESIDENT & CEO

IndividualMC LEAN, VA

$3,300

May 3, 2024

REID, JACK

RAM CUSTOM SERVICES • PRESIDENT

IndividualCHESAPEAKE BEACH, MD

$3,300

May 6, 2024

LEWIS, JACQUELINE

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualWASHINGTON, DC

$3,300

Jul 10, 2023

LEWIS, JACQUELINE

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualWASHINGTON, DC

$3,300

Jul 10, 2023

BARRY, DAVID E. JR

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualBEALLSVILLE, MD

$2,500

May 12, 2024

POLASKI, MICHAEL

THE DONOHOE COMPANIES INC. • EXECUTIVE

IndividualBROADLANDS, VA

$2,500

May 13, 2024

GRUNLEY, KENNETH

GRUNLEY CONSTRUCTION • CEO

IndividualPOTOMAC, MD

$2,500

Jun 23, 2023

BRUCH, CHRIS

THE DONOHOE COMPANIES INC. • CEO

IndividualBETHESDA, MD

$2,300

Apr 30, 2024

EARNEST, JAMES M.

SELF-EMPLOYED • REAL ESTATE INVESTOR

IndividualBETHESDA, MD

$2,300

May 10, 2024

Rep. Gottheimer, Josh [D-NJ-5]

ID: G000583

Top Contributors

AMERICAN EXPRESS

OrganizationNEWARK, NJ

$22,941

Apr 12, 2024

AMERICAN EXPRESS

OrganizationNEWARK, NJ

$10,621

May 10, 2024

PAYROLL DATA PROCESSING

OrganizationTAMPA, FL

$6,337

May 15, 2024

PAYROLL DATA PROCESSING

OrganizationTAMPA, FL

$6,337

Apr 15, 2024

PAYROLL DATA PROCESSING

OrganizationTAMPA, FL

$6,337

Apr 30, 2024

PAYROLL DATA PROCESSING

OrganizationTAMPA, FL

$5,751

Apr 1, 2024

EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS

OrganizationCHEROKEE, NC

$3,300

Oct 22, 2024

SEKAS LAW GROUP LLC

OrganizationENGLEWOOD CLIFFS, NJ

$1,500

Apr 12, 2024

SANDOR F. GENET & ASSOCIATES, P.A.

OrganizationNORTH MIAMI BEACH, FL

$250

Apr 12, 2024

FIRESTONE MILKEN, SARAH

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualPACIFIC PALISADES, CA

$13,200

Jul 2, 2024

Rep. Elfreth, Sarah [D-MD-3]

ID: E000301

Top Contributors

CARROLL HYNSON AND SON

OrganizationANNAPOLIS, MD

$1,000

Sep 26, 2024

DARCARS

OrganizationBETHESDA, MD

$500

May 28, 2024

DARCARS

OrganizationBETHESDA, MD

$500

Jun 14, 2024

ROCK REALTY LLC

OrganizationELKRIDGE, MD

$250

Jun 30, 2024

GROSSMAN, JENNIFER

SHALOM TIKVAH • DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS

IndividualBALTIMORE, MD

$6,600

Mar 28, 2024

GROSSMAN, JENNIFER

IndividualBALTIMORE, MD

$6,600

Mar 28, 2024

BARTLETT, BRANDON

RISE UP COFFEE • OWNER

IndividualANNAPOLIS, MD

$3,300

Oct 22, 2024

DALTON, NANCY

ANNAPOLIS MICRO SYSTEMS INC. • PRESIDENT OF TECH COMPANY

IndividualANNAPOLIS, MD

$3,300

Oct 29, 2024

GABEL, CAROLINE

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualCHESTERTOWN, MD

$3,300

Oct 25, 2024

SAPPERSTEIN, MARK

28 WALKER DEVELOPMENT • REAL ESTATE

IndividualBALTIMORE, MD

$3,300

Oct 28, 2024

Rep. Goldman, Daniel S. [D-NY-10]

ID: G000599

Top Contributors

BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationLAKESIDE, CA

$1,500

May 19, 2023

GOLDSTEIN, DARIN

SDG CAPITAL MANAGEMENT • MANAGER

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$6,600

May 31, 2023

GOLDSTEIN, DARIN

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$6,600

Jun 19, 2023

SCHWARTZ, DAVID

SLATE PROPERTY GROUP • EXECUTIVE

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$5,000

Oct 17, 2023

SCHWARTZ, DAVID

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$5,000

Oct 26, 2023

ADAMS, RICHARD

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Oct 26, 2024

ANDREESSEN, MARC

SELF • ATTORNEY

IndividualLOS ALTOS, CA

$3,300

Oct 23, 2024

BARTH, RICHARD

MARYLAND • PROFESSOR

IndividualBALTIMORE, MD

$3,300

Oct 27, 2024

BLUMENTHAL, VIOLETTE

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualDURHAM, NC

$3,300

Oct 26, 2024

BRUNO, JACQUELINE

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualWHITESTONE, NY

$3,300

Oct 26, 2024

Rep. Ross, Deborah K. [D-NC-2]

ID: R000305

Top Contributors

CHEROKEE NATION

OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK

$1,000

Dec 8, 2023

COOPER, JOHN D JR.

NOT EMPLOYED • CONTRACTOR/ENGINEER

IndividualRALEIGH, NC

$6,600

May 8, 2023

MARTIN, LOUISE PORTER

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualRALEIGH, NC

$4,600

Dec 29, 2023

WILKES, NANCY

UNC HOSPITALS • PHYSICIAN

IndividualCHAPEL HILL, NC

$3,300

Oct 31, 2024

ALLEN, DIANA

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualCARY, NC

$3,300

Dec 30, 2023

ALSOP, JOSEPH

ALSOP LOUIE PARTNERS • VENTURE PARTNER

IndividualBEVERLY, MA

$3,300

Dec 29, 2023

ALSUP, WILLIAM B III

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualWASHINGTON, DC

$3,300

Oct 17, 2023

BEEUWKES, REINIER

ISCHEMIX • CEO

IndividualCONCORD, MA

$3,300

Dec 31, 2023

DEBNAM, CAREY

SELF EMPLOYED • PROPERTY MANAGEMENT

IndividualRALEIGH, NC

$3,300

Dec 21, 2023

DEBNAM, SESHA F

DEBNAM PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC • PROPERTY MANAGER

IndividualRALEIGH, NC

$3,300

Dec 21, 2023

Donor Network - Rep. Wasserman Schultz, Debbie [D-FL-25]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 82 nodes and 45 connections (76 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $136,625

Top Donors - Rep. Wasserman Schultz, Debbie [D-FL-25]

Showing top 24 donors by contribution amount

1 PAC6 Orgs17 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 5 helped.

+Hospitals & Health Systemsconfidence 0.80
Section 2 reauthorizes the Young Women's Breast Health Education and Awareness Requires Learning Young Act of 2009, which may lead to increased funding for breast health education and awareness programs in hospitals and health systems (42 U.S.C. 280m(h))
+Health Insuranceconfidence 0.80
Section 2 reauthorizes the Young Women's Breast Health Education and Awareness Requires Learning Young Act of 2009, which may lead to increased coverage for breast health education and awareness programs by health insurance providers (42 U.S.C. 280m(h))
+Pharmaceuticalsconfidence 0.60
Section 2 reauthorizes the Young Women's Breast Health Education and Awareness Requires Learning Young Act of 2009, which may lead to increased research and development of breast cancer treatments by pharmaceutical companies (42 U.S.C. 280m(h))
+Medical Devicesconfidence 0.60
Section 2 reauthorizes the Young Women's Breast Health Education and Awareness Requires Learning Young Act of 2009, which may lead to increased development and use of medical devices for breast cancer screening and diagnosis (42 U.S.C. 280m(h))
+Biotech & Researchconfidence 0.60
Section 2 reauthorizes the Young Women's Breast Health Education and Awareness Requires Learning Young Act of 2009, which may lead to increased research and development of biotechnology solutions for breast cancer (42 U.S.C. 280m(h))

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Wasserman Schultz, Debbie [D-FL-25])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HELPS

Health Insurance$20
from 4 contributions
- LUNA, JORGE$20

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Health and Human Services

Strong

Vector: 60%

Pages: 530-532AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HR 4541 aligns with Project 2025's HHS objective of protecting and strengthening equitable access to high-quality, affordable healthcare by expanding cancer screening programs and reducing disparities in underserved populations, including racial minorities and low-income individuals."

Key themes:equitable healthcare accessreducing health disparitiesunderserved populationspreventive carewomen's health initiatives

— 498 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise ENDNOTES 1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Strategic Plan, FY 2018–2022, p. 50, https://aspe.hhs.gov/ sites/default/files/documents/feac346aca967bfadc446398679e14ec/hhs-strategic-plan-fy-2018-2022.pdf (accessed February 7, 2023). 2. “Strategic Goal 1: Protect and Strengthen Equitable Access to High Quality and Affordable Healthcare” in ibid. “In the context of HHS, this Strategic Plan adopts the definition of underserved communities listed in Executive Order 13985: Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities through the Federal Government to refer to ‘populations sharing a particular characteristic, as well as geographic communities, who have been systematically denied a full opportunity to participate in aspects of economic, social, and civic life’; this definition includes individuals who belong to underserved communities that have been denied such treatment, such as Black, Latino, and Indigenous and Native American persons, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders and other persons of color; members of religious minorities; lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) persons; persons with disabilities; persons who live in rural areas; and persons otherwise adversely affected by persistent poverty or inequality. Individuals may belong to more than one underserved community and face intersecting barriers. This definition applies to the terms underserved communities and underserved populations throughout this Strategic Plan.” Ibid. Emphasis in original. 3. Karen Weintraub, “Americans’ Life Expectancy Continues to Fall, Erasing Health Gains of the Last Quarter Century,” USA Today, December 22, 2022, https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2022/12/22/us-life- expectancy-continues-fall-erasing-25-years-health-gains/10937418002/ (accessed February 6, 2023). 4. Apoorva Mandavilli, “The C.D.C. Isn’t Publishing Large Portions of the Data It Collects,” The New York Times, updated February 22, 2022, https://www.congress.gov/117/meeting/house/114450/documents/HHRG-117- IF02-20220302-SD004.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023). 5. Zachary B. Sluzala and Edmund F. Haislmaier, “Lessons from COVID-19: How Policymakers Should Reform the Regulation of Clinical Testing,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 3696, March 28, 2022, https://www. heritage.org/public-health/report/lessons-covid-19-how-policymakers-should-reform-the-regulation-clinical. 6. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (C),” https://www.cdc.gov/maso/pdf/cdcmiss.pdf (March 16, 2023). 7. Judith Garber, “CDC ‘Disclaimers’ Hide Financial Conflicts of Interest,” Lown Institute Accountability Blog, November 6, 2019, https://lowninstitute.org/cdc-disclaimers-hide-financial-conflicts-of-interest/ (accessed February 6, 2023). See also U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “CDC Foundation Active Programs (October 1, 2014–September 30, 2015),” https://www. cdcfoundation.org/sites/default/files/upload/pdf/CDCFoundation-ActivePrograms-FY2015.pdf (accessed February 7, 2023); “CDC Active Programs (October 1, 2015–September 30, 2016),” https://www.cdcfoundation. org/sites/default/files/upload/pdf/CDCFoundation-ActivePrograms-FY2016.pdf (accessed February 7, 2023); “CDC Foundation Active Programs (October 1, 2016–September 30, 2017),” https://www.cdcfoundation.org/ sites/default/files/upload/pdf/CDCFoundation-ActivePrograms-FY2017.pdf (accessed February 7, 2023); “CDC Foundation Active Programs (October 1, 2017–September 30, 2018),” https://www.cdcfoundation.org/sites/default/ files/upload/pdf/CDCFoundation-ActivePrograms-FY2018.pdf (accessed February 7, 2023); “CDC Foundation Active Programs, October 1, 2018–September 30, 2019,” https://www.cdcfoundation.org/sites/default/files/upload/ pdf/CDCFoundation-ActivePrograms-FY2019.pdf (accessed February 7, 2023); “CDC Foundation Active Programs, October 1, 2029–September 30, 2020,” https://www.cdcfoundation.org/CDCF-ActivePrograms-CDC-FY20?inline (accessed February 7, 2023); and “CDC Foundation Active Programs, October 1, 2020–September 30, 2021,” https://www.cdcfoundation.org/CDCF-ActivePrograms-CDC-FY21?inline (accessed February 7, 2023). 8. Joel White and Doug Badger, “In Order to Defeat COVID-19, the Federal Government Must Modernize Its Public Health Data,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 3527, September 3, 2020, https://www.heritage. org/sites/default/files/2020-09/BG3527_0.pdf. 9. S. 15, Ensuring Accurate and Complete Abortion Data Reporting Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 23, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/s15/BILLS-118s15is.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023), and H.R. 632, Ensuring Accurate and Complete Abortion Data Reporting Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 30, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr632/BILLS-118hr632ih.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023). 10. Doug Badger, “How Congress Can Make Real Progress on Drug Prices,” Heritage Foundation Issue Brief No. 5016, December 9, 2019, https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/files/2019-12/IB5016_1.pdf. — 499 — Department of Health and Human Services 11. Sluzala and Haislmaier, “Lessons From COVID-19: How Policymakers Should Reform the Regulation of Clinical Testing.” 12. Ibid. 13. H.R. 5471, Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988, Public Law No. 100-578, 100th Congress, October 31, 1988, https://uscode.house.gov/statutes/pl/100/578.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 14. Sluzala and Haislmaier, “Lessons From COVID-19: How Policymakers Should Reform the Regulation of Clinical Testing.” 15. Edmund F. Haislmaier, “Ensuring Americans’ Access to Pharmaceuticals: A Primer and Road Map for Policymakers,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 3545, October 20, 2020, https://www.heritage.org/ sites/default/files/2020-10/BG3545.pdf. 16. 18 U.S.C. 1461, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1461 (accessed March 16, 2023), and 18 U.S.C. 1462, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1462 (accessed March 16, 2023). 17. H.R. 1308, Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, Public Law No. 103-141, 103rd Congress, November 16, 1993, https://www.congress.gov/103/statute/STATUTE-107/STATUTE-107-Pg1488.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 18. Charles Piller, “Is FDA’s Revolving Door Open Too Wide?” Science, Vol. 361, No. 6397 (July 6, 2018), p. 21, https://www.science.org/doi/epdf/10.1126/science.361.6397.21 (accessed February 6, 2023). 19. Joel Achenbach, “NIH Halts $100 Million Study of Moderate Drinking That Is Funded by Alcohol Industry,” The Washington Post, May 17, 2018, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2018/05/17/nih- halts-controversial-study-of-moderate-drinking/ (accessed February 6, 2023). 20. Alexander Tin, “Moderna Offers NIH Co-ownership of COVID Vaccine Patent amid Dispute with Government,” CBS News, November 15, 2021, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/moderna-covid-vaccine-patent-dispute- national-institutes-health/ (accessed February 6, 2023). 21. Informed Consent Action Network, “NIH Officials Profiting from COVID-19 Vaccine,” June 3, 2021, https://www. icandecide.org/nih-officials-profiting-from-covid-19-vaccine/ (accessed February 6, 2023). 22. Adam Andrzejewski, “Substack Investigation: Fauci’s Royalties and the $350 Million Royalty Payment Stream HIDDEN by NIH,” Open the Books Substack, May 9, 2022, https://openthebooks.substack. com/p/faucis-royalties-and-the-350-million?utm_source=/profile/24758236-adam-andrzejewski&utm_ medium=reader2&s=w (accessed February 6, 2023). 23. Robert E. Moffit, “Time to Reverse Hospital Market Consolidation,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, January 5, 2022, https://www.heritage.org/health-care-reform/commentary/time-reverse-hospital-market-consolidation. 24. H.R. 3590, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Public Law No. 111-148, 111th Congress, March 23, 2021, https://www.congress.gov/111/plaws/publ148/PLAW-111publ148.pdf (accessed March 16, 2023). 25. Brian J. Miller, Robert E. Moffit, James Ficke, Joseph Marine, and Jesse Ehrenfeld, “Reversing Hospital Consolidation: The Promise of Physician-Owned Hospitals,” Health Affairs Forefront, April 12, 2021, https:// www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/forefront.20210408.980640/ (accessed February 13, 2023). 26. Robert E. Moffit, “Medicare’s Future: Challenges and Opportunities,” testimony before the Special Committee on Aging, U.S. Senate, November 21, 2022, https://www.heritage.org/testimony/medicares-future-challenges- and-opportunities. 27. 42 U.S. Code § 256b, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/256b (accessed March 16, 2023). 28. H.R. 3590, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, § 3022. 29. H.R. 5376, Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, Public Law No. 117-169, 117th Congress, August 16, 2022, https:// www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ169/PLAW-117publ169.pdf (accessed March 16, 2023). 30. Robert E. Moffit, “Reducing Patient Access to New Medications Is the Left’s Latest Medicare Price-Fixing Scheme,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, July 22, 2022, https://www.heritage.org/medicare/commentary/ reducing-patient-access-new-medications-the-lefts-latest-medicare-price-fixing, and Badger, “How Congress Can Make Real Progress on Drug Prices.” 31. Nina Owcharenko Schaefer, “Medicaid at 55: Understanding the Design, Trends, and Reforms Needed to Improve the Health Care Safety Net,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 3604, April 14, 2021, https:// www.heritage.org/sites/default/files/2021-04/BG3604_0.pdf, and Brian C. Blase, “Punishing Conservative States: Payment Cuts to Hospitals Where Federal Spending Is Already Low,” Paragon Health Institute, December 2021, https://paragoninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Punishing-Conservative-States- HTML.html (accessed February 13, 2023).

Department of Health and Human Services

Weak

Vector: 63%

Pages: 533-535AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HR 4541 focuses on breast and cervical cancer screening and education, while the Project 2025 HHS section emphasizes abortion-related policies, conscience protections, gender-affirming care restrictions, and civil rights rollbacks in health programs. There is minimal thematic overlap, as the bill does not address abortion, religious exemptions, or LGBTQ+ healthcare restrictions central to the Project 2025 agenda."

Key themes:Department of Health and Human Serviceswomen's healthpreventive care

— 501 — Department of Health and Human Services 54. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of Civil Rights, and Office of the Secretary, “Special Responsibilities of Medicare Hospitals in Emergency Cases and Discrimination on the Basis of Disability in Critical Health and Human Service Programs or Activities,” draft of Proposed Rule, January 14, 2021, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/infants-nprm.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 55. H.R. 26, Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https:// www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr26/BILLS-118hr26pcs.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 56. H.R. 7, No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr7/BILLS-118hr7ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 57. S. 401, Conscience Protection Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced February 24, 2021, https://www.congress. gov/117/bills/s401/BILLS-117s401is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 58. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and Office of the Secretary, “Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Notice of Tribal Consultation, Federal Register, Vol. 87, No. 149 (August 4, 2022), pp. 47824–47920, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-08-04/pdf/2022-16217.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 59. Ibid., p. 47916. 60. The regulation was not finalized before the end of the Administration. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Services, “Revision of Categorical Eligibility in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP),” Proposed Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 142 (July 24, 2019), pp. 35570–55581, https:// www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/07/24/2019-15670/revision-of-categorical-eligibility-in-the- supplemental-nutrition-assistance-program-snap (accessed March 17, 2023). 61. 45 Code of Federal Regulations § 75.300(c) and (d), https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/ subchapter-A/part-75/subpart-D/subject-group-ECFR911e5e1a30bfbcb/section-75.300 (accessed March 17, 2023). 62. H.R. 1750, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https:// www.congress.gov/117/bills/hr1750/BILLS-117hr1750ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023), and S. 656, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/ s656/BILLS-117s656is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 63. S. 3949, Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2022, Public Law No. 117-348, 117th Congress, January 25, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ348/PLAW-117publ348.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 64. Kelsey Y. Santamaria, “Child Migrants at the Border: The Flores Settlement Agreement and Other Legal Developments,” Congressional Research Service In Focus No. IF11799, April 1, 2021, https://crsreports.congress. gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11799 (accessed March 17, 2023). 65. Report, Building a Happy Home: Marriage Education as a Tool to Strengthen Families, Social Capital Project Report No. 1-22, March 2022, p. 17, https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/3d102525-6f0d-48ed- 92f4-d71edd468ad6/building-a-happy-home.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). The cover of the report reflects that the Social Capital Project is “[a] project of the Joint Economic Committee – Republicans.” 66. See, for example, Alan J. Hawkins, “Are Federally Supported Relationship Education Programs for Lower-Income Individuals and Couples Working? A Review of Evaluation Research,” American Enterprise Institute, September 2019, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 67. H.R. 8404, Respect for Marriage Act, Public Law No. 117-228, 117th Congress, December 13, 2022, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 68. Madison Marino, “Over 1,000 Safety Violations Mar Head Start. Children Deserve Better,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, November 10, 2022, https://www.heritage.org/education/commentary/over-1000-safety- violations-mar-head-start-children-deserve-better. 69. American Hospital Association v. Becerra, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), https://www.supremecourt.gov/ opinions/21pdf/20-1114_09m1.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 70. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, “Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Federal Register, Vol. 88, No. 22 (February 2, 2023), pp. 7236–7281, https://www. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-02-02/pdf/2023-01981.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). — 502 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 71. 42 U.S. Code § 238n, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/238n (accessed March 17, 2023). 72. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, “Early Childhood Health,” last reviewed October 2022, https://mchb.hrsa.gov/programs-impact/focus-areas/early- childhood-health (accessed March 17, 2023). 73. American Pregnancy Association, “Having a Doula—What Are the Benefits?” https://americanpregnancy. org/healthy-pregnancy/labor-and-birth/having-a-doula/#:~:text=Other%20studies%20have%20shown%20 that%20having%20a%20doula,massage%20to%20reduce%20stress%20and%20anxiety%20during%20labor (accessed March 17, 2023). 74. S. 2372, VA MISSION [Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks] Act of 2018, Public Law No. 115-182, 115th Congress, June 6, 2018, https://www.congress.gov/115/plaws/publ182/ PLAW-115publ182.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 75. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Securing Updated and Necessary Statutory Evaluations Timely,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 11 (January 19, 2021), pp. 5694–5764, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-01-19/pdf/2021-00597.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023). 76. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, “Compliance with Statutory Program Integrity Requirements,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 42 (March 4, 2029), pp. 7714–7791, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-03-04/pdf/2019-03461.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 77. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, “Ensuring Access to Equitable, Affordable, Client-Centered, Quality Family Planning Services,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 192 (October 7, 2021), pp. 56144–56180, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/ pkg/FR-2021-10-07/pdf/2021-21542.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 78. S. 624, Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act, 118th Congress, introduced March 2, 2023, https://www. congress.gov/118/bills/s624/BILLS-118s624is.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 79. 50 U.S. Code Chapter 55, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/chapter-55 (accessed March 22, 2023). 80. 18 U.S. Code § 13, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/13 (accessed March 18, 2023). 81. Bowen v. American Hospital Association, 476 U.S. 610 (1986), https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/ usrep/usrep476/usrep476610/usrep476610.pdf (accessed 22, 2023). 82. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, “Notification of Interpretation and Enforcement of Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972,” Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 99 (May 25, 2021), pp. 27984–27985, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2021-05-25/pdf/2021-10477.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 83. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, “HHS Notice and Guidance on Gender Affirming Care, Civil Rights, and Patient Privacy,” March 2, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/hhs- ocr-notice-and-guidance-gender-affirming-care.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 84. Heckler v. Chaney, 420 U.S. 821 (1985), https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/470/821.html (accessed March 18, 2022). 85. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, “Guidance to Nation’s Retail Pharmacies: Obligations Under Federal Civil Rights Laws to Ensure Access to Comprehensive Reproductive Health Care Services,” content last reviewed July 14, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/civil-rights/for-individuals/ special-topics/reproductive-healthcare/pharmacies-guidance/index.html (accessed March 18, 2023). 86. H.R. 3103, “Health Insurance and Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, Public Law No. 104-191, 104th Congress, August 21, 1996, https://www.congress.gov/104/plaws/publ191/PLAW-104publ191.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 87. U.S. Department of Human Services, “HIPAA Privacy Rule and Disclosures of Information Relating to Reproductive Health Care,” content last reviewed June 29, 2022, (accessed March 18, 2023). See also “Protecting the Privacy and Security of Your Health Information When Using Your Personal Cell Phone or Tablet,” content last reviewed June 29, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/guidance/ cell-phone-hipaa/index.html (accessed March 18, 2023).

Department of Health and Human Services

Weak

Vector: 61%

Pages: 533-535AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HR 4541 focuses on reauthorizing and enhancing breast and cervical cancer screening programs, which is unrelated to the Project 2025 HHS policy excerpts that emphasize Medicaid reform, abortion restrictions, conscience protections, and healthcare transparency. There is no substantive overlap in objectives or mechanisms between the bill and the cited policy sections."

Key themes:healthcare accesspreventive services

— 500 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 32. Owcharenko Schaefer, “Medicaid at 55: Understanding the Design, Trends, and Reforms Needed to Improve the Health Care Safety Net.” 33. Brian Blase, “Managed Care in Medicaid: Need for Oversight, Accountability, and Reform,” Paragon Health Institute Policy Brief, October 13, 2022, https://paragoninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/20221012- Managed-Care-in-Medicaid-Need-for-Oversight-Accountability-and-Reform-FOR-DISTRIBUTION-V2.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 34. Owcharenko Schaefer, “Medicaid at 55: Understanding the Design, Trends, and Reforms Needed to Improve the Health Care Safety Net.” 35. 42 U.S. Code § 1315, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1315 (accessed March 17, 2023). 36. Chad D. Savage and Lee S. Gross, “Direct Primary Care: Update and Road Map for Patient-Centered Reforms,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 3635, June 28, 2021, https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/ files/2021-06/BG3635.pdf. 37. H.R. 133, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, Public Law No. 116-260, 116th Congress, December 27, 2020, Division BB, Title I, https://www.congress.gov/116/plaws/publ260/PLAW-116publ260.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 38. Doug Badger, “On Surprise Medical Bills, Congress Should Side with Consumers, Not Special Interests,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, January 31, 2020, https://www.heritage.org/health-care-reform/ commentary/surprise-medical-bills-congress-should-side-consumers-not-special. 39. Edmund F. Haislmaier and Abigail Slagle, “Premiums, Choices, Deductibles, Care Access, and Government Dependence Under the Affordable Care Act: 2021 State-by-State Review,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 3668, November 2, 2021, https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/files/2021-11/BG3668.pdf. 40. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Transparency in Coverage,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 85, No. 219 (November 12, 2020), pp. 72158–72310, https://www.govinfo.gov/ content/pkg/FR-2020-11-12/pdf/2020-24591.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 41. David N. Bernstein and Robert E. Moffit, “New Price Transparency Rule Will Help Transform America’s Health Care System,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, November 1, 2020, https://www.heritage.org/health-care- reform/commentary/new-price-transparency-rule-will-help-transform-americas-health-care. 42. Sluzala and Haislmaier, “Lessons from COVID-19: How Policymakers Should Reform the Regulation of Clinical Testing.” 43. Ibid. 44. Most recently enacted in H.R. 2471, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022, Public Law No. 117-103, 117th Congress, March 15, 2022, Division H, Title V, §§ 506–507, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ103/ PLAW-117publ103.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 45. President Joseph R. Biden Jr., Executive Order 14079, “Securing Access to Reproductive and Other Healthcare Services,” August 3, 2022, in Federal Register, Vol. 87, No. 154 (August 11, 2022), pp. 49505–49507, https:// www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-08-11/pdf/2022-17420.pdf (accessed March 16, 2023). 46. Planned Parenthood, 2020–2021 Annual Report, p. 27, https://www.plannedparenthood.org/uploads/ filer_public/40/8f/408fc2ad-c8c2-48da-ad87-be5cc257d370/211214-ppfa-annualreport-20-21-c3-digital.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023). 47. Ibid., pp. 30 and 31. Total revenue of $1,714.4 million (p. 30) minus $1,580.7 million in total expenses (p. 31) yields $133,7 million. 48. Ibid., p. 28. 49. Ibid., p. 30. 50. H.R. 372, Protecting Life and Taxpayers Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 17, 2023, https://www. congress.gov/118/bills/hr372/BILLS-118hr372ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 51. 42 U.S. Code § 18023, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/18023 (accessed March 17, 2023). 52. H.R. 3128, Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985, Public Law No. 99-272, 99th Congress, April 7, 1986, Title IX, Subtitle A, Part 1, Subpart B, § 9121, https://www.congress.gov/99/statute/STATUTE-100/ STATUTE-100-Pg82.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 53. H.R. 8070, Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Public Law No. 93-112, 93rd Congress, September 26, 1973, https://www. congress.gov/93/statute/STATUTE-87/STATUTE-87-Pg355.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). — 501 — Department of Health and Human Services 54. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of Civil Rights, and Office of the Secretary, “Special Responsibilities of Medicare Hospitals in Emergency Cases and Discrimination on the Basis of Disability in Critical Health and Human Service Programs or Activities,” draft of Proposed Rule, January 14, 2021, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/infants-nprm.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 55. H.R. 26, Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https:// www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr26/BILLS-118hr26pcs.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 56. H.R. 7, No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr7/BILLS-118hr7ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 57. S. 401, Conscience Protection Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced February 24, 2021, https://www.congress. gov/117/bills/s401/BILLS-117s401is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 58. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and Office of the Secretary, “Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Notice of Tribal Consultation, Federal Register, Vol. 87, No. 149 (August 4, 2022), pp. 47824–47920, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-08-04/pdf/2022-16217.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 59. Ibid., p. 47916. 60. The regulation was not finalized before the end of the Administration. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Services, “Revision of Categorical Eligibility in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP),” Proposed Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 142 (July 24, 2019), pp. 35570–55581, https:// www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/07/24/2019-15670/revision-of-categorical-eligibility-in-the- supplemental-nutrition-assistance-program-snap (accessed March 17, 2023). 61. 45 Code of Federal Regulations § 75.300(c) and (d), https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/ subchapter-A/part-75/subpart-D/subject-group-ECFR911e5e1a30bfbcb/section-75.300 (accessed March 17, 2023). 62. H.R. 1750, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https:// www.congress.gov/117/bills/hr1750/BILLS-117hr1750ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023), and S. 656, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/ s656/BILLS-117s656is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 63. S. 3949, Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2022, Public Law No. 117-348, 117th Congress, January 25, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ348/PLAW-117publ348.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 64. Kelsey Y. Santamaria, “Child Migrants at the Border: The Flores Settlement Agreement and Other Legal Developments,” Congressional Research Service In Focus No. IF11799, April 1, 2021, https://crsreports.congress. gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11799 (accessed March 17, 2023). 65. Report, Building a Happy Home: Marriage Education as a Tool to Strengthen Families, Social Capital Project Report No. 1-22, March 2022, p. 17, https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/3d102525-6f0d-48ed- 92f4-d71edd468ad6/building-a-happy-home.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). The cover of the report reflects that the Social Capital Project is “[a] project of the Joint Economic Committee – Republicans.” 66. See, for example, Alan J. Hawkins, “Are Federally Supported Relationship Education Programs for Lower-Income Individuals and Couples Working? A Review of Evaluation Research,” American Enterprise Institute, September 2019, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 67. H.R. 8404, Respect for Marriage Act, Public Law No. 117-228, 117th Congress, December 13, 2022, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 68. Madison Marino, “Over 1,000 Safety Violations Mar Head Start. Children Deserve Better,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, November 10, 2022, https://www.heritage.org/education/commentary/over-1000-safety- violations-mar-head-start-children-deserve-better. 69. American Hospital Association v. Becerra, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), https://www.supremecourt.gov/ opinions/21pdf/20-1114_09m1.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 70. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, “Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Federal Register, Vol. 88, No. 22 (February 2, 2023), pp. 7236–7281, https://www. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-02-02/pdf/2023-01981.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023).

Department of Health and Human Services

Minimal

Vector: 62%

Pages: 518-520AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HR 4541 focuses on breast and cervical cancer screening and education, while the Project 2025 policy excerpt addresses fertility awareness-based methods, contraceptive mandates, gender transition care, abortion training restrictions, and childcare policy—none of which are thematically related to cancer screening initiatives."

— 485 — Department of Health and Human Services 2022, a federal court blocked this attempt to eliminate health insurance coverage for fertility awareness–based methods of family planning from requirements that cover at least 58 million women, and the judge made his ruling permanent in December 2022. HRSA should promulgate regulations consistent with this order. HHS should more thoroughly ensure that fertility awareness–based methods of family planning are part of women’s preventive services under the ACA. FABMs often involve costs for materials and supplies, and HHS should make clear that coverage of those items is also required. FABMs are highly effective and allow women to make family planning choices in a manner that meets their needs and reflects their values. l Eliminate men’s preventive services from the women’s preventive services mandate. In December 2021, HRSA updated its women’s preventive services guidelines to include male condoms after claiming for years that it had no authority to do so because Congress explicitly limited the mandate to “women’s” preventive care and screenings. HRSA should not incorporate exclusively male contraceptive methods into guidelines that specify they encompass only women’s services. l Eliminate the week-after-pill from the contraceptive mandate as a potential abortifacient. One of the emergency contraceptives covered under the HRSA preventive services guidelines is Ella (ulipristal acetate). Like its close cousin, the abortion pill mifepristone, Ella is a progesterone blocker and can prevent a recently fertilized embryo from implanting in a woman’s uterus. HRSA should eliminate this potential abortifacient from the contraceptive mandate. l Withdraw Ryan White guidance allowing funds to pay for cross-sex transition support. HRSA should withdraw all guidance encouraging Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program service providers to provide controversial “gender transition” procedures or “gender-affirming care,” which cause irreversible physical and mental harm to those who receive them. l Ensure that training for medical professionals (doctors, nurses, etc.) and doulas is not being used for abortion training. HHS should ensure that training programs for medical professionals—including doctors, nurses, and doulas—are in full compliance with restrictions on abortion funding and conscience-protection laws. In addition, HHS should: — 486 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 1. Investigate state medical school compliance with the Coats–Snowe Amendment,71 which prohibits discrimination against health care entities that do not provide or undergo training for abortion. 2. Ensure that the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) complies with all relevant conscience statutes and regulations and that states have taken the affirmative steps (for example, by issuing regulations) to assure compliance with Coats–Snowe. 3. Communicate to medical schools that any abortion-related training must be on an opt-in rather than opt-out basis. 4. Require states that receive HHS funds to issue regulations or enter into arrangements with accrediting bodies to comply with the Coats–Snowe Amendment’s prohibition of mandatory abortion training by individuals or institutions. The Coats–Snowe Amendment specifically requires such state regulations or arrangements. l Prioritize funding for home-based childcare, not universal day care. As HRSA’s Early Childhood Health page outlines, “Currently, only about half of U.S. preschoolers are on-track with their development and ready for school. And more than one in four of children (28%) who experience abuse or neglect are under 3 years old.”72 Concurrently, children who spend significant time in day care experience higher rates of anxiety, depression, and neglect as well as poor educational and developmental outcomes. Instead of providing universal day care, funding should go to parents either to offset the cost of staying home with a child or to pay for familial, in-home childcare. l Provide education and resources on early childhood health. By partnering with new organizations like the Center on Child and Family Poverty, HRSA should provide resources and information on the importance of the mother–child relationship in child well-being. This should include relationship education curricula that equip mothers and caregivers to connect with and improve their understanding of their infants, toddlers, and young children. Maternal and Child Health. Currently, the HRSA Maternal and Child Health program is collecting data on the benefits of doulas in improving the health, safety, and emotional well-being of mothers at birth. Doulas provide a patient-focused, nonmedical support system for single or married mothers that “decreases the

Department of Education

Minimal

Vector: 60%

Pages: 365-367AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HR 4541 focuses on breast and cervical cancer screening and education for young women, while the Project 2025 policy addresses Title IX regulations, student loan programs, and data collection on sex categories in education—there is no thematic or policy overlap between the two."

— 332 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise to create and collect data on a new “nonbinary” sex category (in addition to the current “male” or “female” sex categories) and to retire data collection that indi- cates the number of (1) high school–level interscholastic athletics sports in which only male and female students participate, (2) high school–level athletics teams in which only male or female students participate, and (3) participants on high school–level interscholastic athletics sports teams in which only male or only female students participate. These poorly conceived changes are contrary to law, fail to take account of student privacy interests and statutory protections favoring parental rights under the Protection of Pupils Rights Amendment, and jettison longstanding data collections that assist in the enforcement of Title IX. l The new Administration must quickly move to rescind these changes, which add a new “nonbinary” sex category to OCR’S data collection and issue a new CRDC that will collect data directly relevant to OCR’s statutory enforcement authority. Student Assistance General Provisions, Federal Perkins Loan Program, and William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program Final Regulations Effective July 1, 2023, the department promulgated final regulations addressing loan forgiveness under the HEA’s provisions for borrower defense to repayment (“BDR”), closed school loan discharge (“CSLD”), and public service loan forgive- ness (“PSLF”). The regulations also included prohibitions against pre-dispute arbitration agreements and class action waivers for students enrolling in institu- tions participating in Title IV student loan programs. Acting outside of statutory authority, the current Administration has drastically expanded BDR, CSLD, and PSLF loan forgiveness without clear congressional authorization at a tremendous cost to the taxpayers, with estimates ranging from $85.1 to $120 billion. l The new Administration must quickly commence negotiated rulemaking and propose that the department rescind these regulations. l The next Administration should also rescind Dear Colleague Letter (DCL) GEN 22-11 and DCL GEN 22-10 and its letters to accreditation agencies dated July 19, 2022, which are attempts to undercut Florida’s SB 7044, providing universities more flexibility on accreditation. Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance (Title IX) With its Notice of Proposed Rulemaking published on July 12, 2022, the Biden Education Department seeks to gut the hard-earned rights of women with its changes to the department’s regulations implementing Title IX, which prohibits

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Rep. Wasserman Schultz, Debbie

Fallen Servicemembers Religious Heritage Restoration Act

119/hr/2701

Sammy’s Law

119/hr/2657

Back to All Bills