Fallen Servicemembers Religious Heritage Restoration Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/2701
Last Updated: December 10, 2025

Sponsored by

Rep. Wasserman Schultz, Debbie [D-FL-25]

ID: W000797

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 292.

December 9, 2025

Introduced

Committee Review

Floor Action

Passed House

Senate Review

📍 Current Status

Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, brought to you by the esteemed members of Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The Fallen Servicemembers Religious Heritage Restoration Act (HR 2701) claims to correct a historical injustice by identifying and rectifying the incorrect religious markers on the graves of American-Jewish servicemembers buried overseas. How noble. In reality, it's just another exercise in feel-good politics, designed to appease a specific constituency while lining the pockets of favored nonprofits.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The bill establishes a program within the American Battle Monuments Commission to identify and correct the mistakes. It also authorizes contracts with nonprofit organizations (read: campaign donors) to carry out this noble work, with a whopping $500,000 annual budget for five years. Because, of course, it takes that much money to fix a few headstones.

Oh, and let's not forget the obligatory extension of pension payment limits in Section 4, because who doesn't love a good pork barrel?

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

* American-Jewish servicemembers' families: The supposed beneficiaries of this bill. I'm sure they're thrilled to have their loved ones' memories used as a prop for political grandstanding. * Nonprofit organizations: The real winners here, with a guaranteed $2.5 million contract over five years. I wonder which well-connected groups will get the nod? * Campaign donors: Ah, yes, the usual suspects. Follow the money trail to discover which PACs and lobby groups are backing this bill.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

This bill is a masterclass in bureaucratic busywork, creating a new program with a hefty price tag to fix a relatively minor issue. The real impact will be on the wallets of taxpayers, who'll foot the bill for this exercise in virtue signaling.

Meanwhile, the actual problems facing American veterans – inadequate healthcare, insufficient support services, and a general lack of respect from their government – remain unaddressed. But hey, at least we can pretend to care about their graves.

Diagnosis: This bill is suffering from a severe case of " Politician's Disease" – a chronic condition characterized by an insatiable desire for self-aggrandizement, a complete disregard for fiscal responsibility, and a willingness to exploit the memories of fallen servicemembers for personal gain. Prognosis: more of the same cynical politics as usual.

Related Topics

Criminal Justice & Law Enforcement Federal Budget & Appropriations National Security & Intelligence State & Local Government Affairs Transportation & Infrastructure Civil Rights & Liberties Small Business & Entrepreneurship Congressional Rules & Procedures Government Operations & Accountability
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

đź’° Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Wasserman Schultz, Debbie [D-FL-25]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$85,400
24 donors
PACs
$2,500
Organizations
$16,900
Committees
$0
Individuals
$66,000
1
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
1 transaction
$2,500
1
SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA
2 transactions
$6,600
2
FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA
1 transaction
$3,300
3
BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS -- GOVERNMENTAL GEN
2 transactions
$3,000
4
POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS
2 transactions
$2,000
5
MICCOSUKEE TRIBE
1 transaction
$1,000
6
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
1 transaction
$1,000

No committee contributions found

1
BERK, MICHAEL
2 transactions
$6,600
2
HARRIS, JOSH
2 transactions
$6,600
3
KAPLOW, LOUIS
2 transactions
$6,600
4
BURGESS, TREVOR
1 transaction
$3,300
5
DAVIDSON, JODI
1 transaction
$3,300
6
LEVAN, ALAN B.
1 transaction
$3,300
7
REID, BENJAMINE J.
1 transaction
$3,300
8
RUBIN, WILLIAM
1 transaction
$3,300
9
BRUNCKHORST, FRANK
1 transaction
$3,300
10
BULKELEY, RAMSAY
1 transaction
$3,300
11
FORCHHEIMER, JODY
1 transaction
$3,300
12
GINDI, ALAN
1 transaction
$3,300
13
GLAZIER, LOUIS
1 transaction
$3,300
14
GORTENBURG, MICHAEL
1 transaction
$3,300
15
GREENBERG, LAWRENCE D
1 transaction
$3,300
16
HACKMAN, MICHAEL
1 transaction
$3,300
17
KROUSE, RODGER
1 transaction
$3,300

Donor Network - Rep. Wasserman Schultz, Debbie [D-FL-25]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 25 nodes and 30 connections

Total contributions: $85,400

Top Donors - Rep. Wasserman Schultz, Debbie [D-FL-25]

Showing top 24 donors by contribution amount

1 PAC6 Orgs17 Individuals

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document. Higher similarity scores indicate stronger thematic connections.

Introduction

Low 50.3%
Pages: 10-13

— ix — Acknowledgments This work, Mandate for Leadership 2025: The Conservative Promise, is a col- lective effort of hundreds of volunteers who have banded together in the spirit of advancing positive change for America. Our work is by no means the comprehensive compendium of conservative policies, nor is our group the exclusive cadre of conservative thinkers. The ideas expressed in this volume are not necessarily shared by all. What unites us is the drive to make our country better. First and foremost, we thank the chapter authors and contributors who gave so freely of their time in service of their country. We were particularly grateful to have the help of dedicated members of The Heritage Foundation’s management and policy teams. Executive Vice President Derrick Morgan, Chief of Staff Wesley Coopersmith, Associate Director of Project 2025 Spencer Chretien, and Thomas A. Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies Director Paul Ray devoted a significant amount of their valuable time to reviewing and editing the lengthy manuscript and provided expert advice and insight. The job of transforming the work of dozens of authors and hundreds of contributors into a cohesive manuscript fell upon Heritage’s formidable team of editors led by Director of Research Editors Therese Pennefather, Senior Editor William T. Poole, Marla Hess, Jessica Lowther, Karina Rollins, and Kathleen Scaturro, without whose tireless efforts you would not be reading these words. The talented work of Data Graphics Services Manager John Fleming, Manager of Web Development and Print Projects Jay Simon, Director of Marketing Elizabeth Fender, Senior Graphic Designer Grace Desandro, and Senior Designer Melissa Bluey came together to bring the volume to life. We also thank the dedicated junior staff who provided immeasurable assistance, especially Jordan Embree, Sarah Calvis, and Jonathan Moy. Most important, we are grateful to the leadership, supporters, and donors of each of the Project 2025 advisory board member organizations and those of The Heritage Foundation, without whom Project 2025 would not be possible. Thank you. Paul Dans & Steven Groves

Introduction

Low 50.3%
Pages: 10-13

— ix — Acknowledgments This work, Mandate for Leadership 2025: The Conservative Promise, is a col- lective effort of hundreds of volunteers who have banded together in the spirit of advancing positive change for America. Our work is by no means the comprehensive compendium of conservative policies, nor is our group the exclusive cadre of conservative thinkers. The ideas expressed in this volume are not necessarily shared by all. What unites us is the drive to make our country better. First and foremost, we thank the chapter authors and contributors who gave so freely of their time in service of their country. We were particularly grateful to have the help of dedicated members of The Heritage Foundation’s management and policy teams. Executive Vice President Derrick Morgan, Chief of Staff Wesley Coopersmith, Associate Director of Project 2025 Spencer Chretien, and Thomas A. Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies Director Paul Ray devoted a significant amount of their valuable time to reviewing and editing the lengthy manuscript and provided expert advice and insight. The job of transforming the work of dozens of authors and hundreds of contributors into a cohesive manuscript fell upon Heritage’s formidable team of editors led by Director of Research Editors Therese Pennefather, Senior Editor William T. Poole, Marla Hess, Jessica Lowther, Karina Rollins, and Kathleen Scaturro, without whose tireless efforts you would not be reading these words. The talented work of Data Graphics Services Manager John Fleming, Manager of Web Development and Print Projects Jay Simon, Director of Marketing Elizabeth Fender, Senior Graphic Designer Grace Desandro, and Senior Designer Melissa Bluey came together to bring the volume to life. We also thank the dedicated junior staff who provided immeasurable assistance, especially Jordan Embree, Sarah Calvis, and Jonathan Moy. Most important, we are grateful to the leadership, supporters, and donors of each of the Project 2025 advisory board member organizations and those of The Heritage Foundation, without whom Project 2025 would not be possible. Thank you. Paul Dans & Steven Groves — xi — The Project 2025 Advisory Board Alabama Policy Institute Alliance Defending Freedom American Compass The American Conservative America First Legal Foundation American Accountability Foundation American Center for Law and Justice American Cornerstone Institute American Council of Trustees and Alumni American Legislative Exchange Council The American Main Street Initiative American Moment American Principles Project Center for Equal Opportunity Center for Family and Human Rights Center for Immigration Studies Center for Renewing America Claremont Institute Coalition for a Prosperous America Competitive Enterprise Institute Conservative Partnership Institute Concerned Women for America Defense of Freedom Institute Ethics and Public Policy Center Family Policy Alliance Family Research Council First Liberty Institute Forge Leadership Network Foundation for Defense of Democracies Foundation for Government Accountability FreedomWorks The Heritage Foundation Hillsdale College Honest Elections Project

Introduction

Low 48.4%
Pages: 30-32

— xxix — Contributors Marlo Lewis, Competitive Enterprise Institute Ben Lieberman, Competitive Enterprise Institute John Ligon Evelyn Lim, American Cornerstone Institute Mario Loyola, Competitive Enterprise Institute John G. Malcolm, The Heritage Foundation Joseph Masterman, Cooper & Kirk, PLLC Earl Matthews, The Vandenberg Coalition Dan Mauler, Heritage Action for America Drew McCall, American Cornerstone Institute Trent McCotter, Boyden Gray & Associates Micah Meadowcroft, The American Conservative Edwin Meese III, The Heritage Foundation Jessica Melugin, Competitive Enterprise Institute Frank Mermoud, Orpheus International Mark Miller, Office of Governor Kristi Noem Cleta Mitchell, Conservative Partnership Institute Kevin E. Moley Caitlin Moon, American Center for Law & Justice Clare Morell, Ethics and Public Policy Center Mark Morgan, The Heritage Foundation Hunter Morgen, American Cornerstone Institute Rachel Morrison, Ethics and Public Policy Center Jonathan Moy, The Heritage Foundation Iain Murray, Competitive Enterprise Institute Ryan Nabil, National Taxpayers Union Michael Nasi, Jackson Walker LLP Lucien Niemeyer, The Niemeyer Group, LLC Nazak Nikakhtar Milan “Mitch” Nikolich Matt O’Brien, Immigration Reform Law Institute Caleb Orr, Boyden Gray & Associates Michael Pack Leah Pedersen Michael Pillsbury, The Heritage Foundation Patrick Pizzella, Leadership Institute Robert Poole, Reason Foundation Christopher B. Porter Kevin Preskenis, Allymar Health Solutions Pam Pryor, National Committee for Religious Freedom Thomas Pyle, Institute for Energy Research John Ratcliffe, American Global Strategies

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text. A score of 60% or higher indicates meaningful thematic overlap. This does not imply direct causation or intent, but highlights areas where legislation aligns with Project 2025 policy objectives.