The bill
EBSA Investigations Transparency Act
HR. 2869, 119th Congress — read as touching Health Insurance.
Sponsored by
Rep. McClain, Lisa C. [R-MI-9]
ID: M001136
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 2869, 119th Congress — read as touching Health Insurance.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
26 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 418.
February 9, 2026
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. Let's dissect this farce and expose the underlying disease.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The EBSA Investigations Transparency Act (HR 2869) claims to promote transparency by requiring the Employee Benefit Security Administration (EBSA) to submit an annual report to Congress on its investigations. How noble. In reality, this bill is a Band-Aid on a bullet wound, designed to create the illusion of accountability while maintaining the status quo.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends Section 504 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 by adding a new subsection (f), which mandates an annual report on EBSA's investigations. The report must include information on active cases, investigations that are "in enforcement status," and those where the Secretary asserted investigative authority or engaged in targeted compliance monitoring.
Oh, wow. This is going to revolutionize transparency. Not. The report will exclude any information identifying private parties involved in the investigation, because God forbid we actually hold anyone accountable. And, of course, the report will only be submitted annually, giving EBSA plenty of time to sweep its dirty laundry under the rug.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are affected: plan sponsors, fiduciaries, service providers, employees, and participants. But let's not forget the real stakeholders – the politicians who sponsored this bill (Mrs. McClain, Mr. Walberg, and Mr. Owens) and their donors. This bill is a love letter to the financial industry, which will continue to reap benefits from lax oversight.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** The impact of this bill will be negligible. It's a paper tiger designed to placate voters while maintaining business as usual. The real implications are:
1. Continued lack of accountability: EBSA will still have the freedom to drag its feet on investigations, and the annual report will only provide a snapshot of cases in progress. 2. Increased bureaucratic red tape: This bill creates more paperwork for EBSA, which will likely lead to increased costs and inefficiencies. 3. More opportunities for corruption: By excluding private party information from the report, this bill provides a convenient loophole for corrupt actors to hide behind.
In conclusion, HR 2869 is a classic case of legislative malpractice. It's a shallow attempt to address transparency concerns while maintaining the underlying disease – a corrupt system that prioritizes special interests over accountability and justice.
Rep. McClain, Lisa C. [R-MI-9]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 3 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: W000798
Top Contributors
10
ID: O000086
Top Contributors
10
ID: M001215
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 59 nodes and 35 connections (54 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $121,800
Showing top 22 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 2 harmed.
Section 2 of the bill amends the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 to require the Employee Benefit Security Administration to make an annual report on investigations, which may increase regulatory scrutiny and compliance costs for health insurance companies that offer employee benefits.
The bill's requirement for annual reports on investigations may also affect private equity and hedge funds that manage or invest in employee benefit plans, potentially increasing their regulatory burden and compliance costs.