The bill
Smith River National Recreation Area Expansion Act
S. 945, 119th Congress β read as touching Construction & Engineering.
Sponsored by
Sen. Merkley, Jeff [D-OR]
ID: M001176
Follow the money
The bill
S. 945, 119th Congress β read as touching Construction & Engineering.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
28 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Public Lands, Forests, and Mining. Hearings held.
December 1, 2025
π Current Status
Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another exercise in legislative theater, courtesy of our esteemed Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Smith River National Recreation Area Expansion Act (S 945) claims to expand the existing recreation area, designate new wild rivers in Oregon, and "protect" various natural resources. How quaint. In reality, this bill is a thinly veiled attempt to appease environmental groups, Native American tribes, and local politicians while lining the pockets of special interest groups.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill makes several changes to existing law, including:
* Expanding the Smith River National Recreation Area by adding new lands and waters * Designating certain rivers in Oregon as "wild" under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act * Modifying management plans for the recreation area to include new standards and guidelines * Allowing for vegetation management projects (read: logging) within the recreation area * Protecting tribal rights and providing access to Native American tribes for cultural activities
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are involved:
* Environmental groups, who will no doubt claim victory in "protecting" the environment while ignoring the bill's loopholes and giveaways to industry * Native American tribes, who may benefit from increased access to traditional lands and resources * Local politicians, who will tout this bill as a win for their constituents while quietly collecting campaign donations from special interest groups * Logging and mining industries, which will exploit the bill's provisions to continue exploiting natural resources
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a masterclass in legislative doublespeak. While it appears to protect the environment and Native American rights, it actually:
* Opens up new areas for logging and resource extraction under the guise of "vegetation management" * Fails to address the root causes of environmental degradation and instead offers token gestures * Provides a fig leaf for politicians to claim they're doing something about conservation while doing little to nothing
In short, this bill is a symptom of a larger disease: the corruption and cowardice that plagues our legislative system. It's a cynical attempt to appease various stakeholders while serving the interests of those who really matter β the ones with deep pockets and influence.
Now, if you'll excuse me, I have better things to do than watch this farce unfold. Next patient, please!
Sen. Merkley, Jeff [D-OR]
Congress 119 β’ 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 3 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: W000779
Top Contributors
10
ID: P000145
Top Contributors
10
ID: S001150
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 71 nodes and 37 connections (74 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $112,800
Showing top 21 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 2 helped, 1 harmed.
Section 2(c)(3)(A) requires the Secretary to modify management plans to fully protect inventoried values, which may involve vegetation management and wildfire resiliency projects, potentially creating work for construction and engineering firms.
Section 2(c)(3)(A) and (B) involve modifying management plans and submitting reports, which may require federal labor and could benefit labor unions involved in federal land management projects.
Section 2(c)(3)(g) preserves the application of the Northwest Forest Plan and Roadless Rule, which may restrict infrastructure development including telecommunications in roadless areas of Oregon.
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Sen. Merkley, Jeff [D-OR])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022βpresent cycles. Donations are not proof of intent β they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.