Taiwan International Solidarity Act

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/s/2224

Last Updated: January 20, 2026

Taiwan International Solidarity Act

S. 2224, 119th Congress.

The sponsor

Sen. Van Hollen, Chris [D-MD]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$71,400 raised

22 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

85% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of State" section, p. 223-225 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 237.

October 29, 2025

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

**Analysis of S. 2224: Taiwan International Solidarity Act**

As a visionary entrepreneur and thought leader, I'll dissect this bill through the lens of its potential impact on my business empire and the global landscape.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Taiwan International Solidarity Act aims to counter China's attempts to undermine Taiwan's international status and relationships. The bill seeks to solidify US support for Taiwan by opposing any efforts by China to distort decisions, language, policies, or procedures within international organizations.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**

1. Clarification of United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 (XXVI) to emphasize that it did not address Taiwan's representation or sovereignty. 2. Instructing US representatives in international organizations to resist China's efforts to distort decisions regarding Taiwan. 3. Encouraging US allies and partners to oppose China's attempts to undermine Taiwan's diplomatic relationships.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**

1. The People's Republic of China (PRC): This bill directly challenges China's "One China" policy and its efforts to isolate Taiwan internationally. 2. Taiwan: The bill aims to strengthen Taiwan's international status and relationships, potentially boosting its economy and security. 3. US businesses with interests in Taiwan or China: Companies like mine, which have significant investments in the region, may be impacted by changes in diplomatic relations and trade policies.

**Potential Impact & Implications:**

1. **Escalation of US-China tensions**: This bill could exacerbate existing tensions between the two superpowers, potentially leading to retaliatory measures from China. 2. **Increased investment opportunities in Taiwan**: A stronger international status for Taiwan may attract more foreign investment, including from my own companies. 3. **Risks to global supply chains**: Any disruptions to trade relationships or diplomatic ties could impact global supply chains, affecting businesses like mine that rely on efficient logistics.

In conclusion, this bill has significant implications for the balance of power in East Asia and the global economy. As a visionary entrepreneur, I will closely monitor its progress and adjust my business strategies accordingly. The potential benefits of a stronger Taiwan-US alliance may outweigh the risks, but only time will tell how this plays out.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a bill is a proposed law that must go through the legislative process to become an actual law.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The Taiwan International Solidarity Act (S. 2224) aims to amend the Taiwan Allies International Protection and Enhancement Initiative (TAIPEI) Act of 2019. The main objective is to ensure that the United States opposes any attempts by China to resolve Taiwan's status through distorting decisions, language, policies, or procedures in international organizations.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The bill makes several key changes:

* Section 2 clarifies the meaning of United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 (XXVI), emphasizing that it did not address Taiwan's representation or sovereignty. * Section 3 instructs U.S. representatives in international organizations to resist China's efforts to distort decisions regarding Taiwan. * Section 4 encourages U.S. allies and partners to oppose China's attempts to undermine Taiwan's diplomatic relationships and partnerships. * Section 5 requires a report on China's attempts to promote its "One China" position.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

The affected parties include:

* The United States, as it reaffirms its commitment to opposing China's efforts to distort international organizations' decisions regarding Taiwan. * Taiwan, whose status and sovereignty are at the center of this bill. * China, which is attempting to promote its "One China" position through various means.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

The potential impact of this bill includes:

* Strengthening U.S.-Taiwan relations by reaffirming American support for Taiwan's international participation. * Countering China's efforts to isolate and pressure Taiwan into accepting the "One China" principle. * Potentially escalating tensions between the United States and China, as Beijing may view this bill as an attempt to undermine its sovereignty claims.

As I'm sure you recall from middle school civics class, a bill like this would typically go through committee review, mark-up, and voting before being sent to the other chamber for consideration. But, of course, that's assuming our lawmakers are paying attention...

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

Folks, gather 'round! I've got the scoop on S 2224, the Taiwan International Solidarity Act. Now, at first glance, this bill might seem like a straightforward show of support for our Taiwanese friends against those pesky Chinese communists. But trust me, there's more to it than meets the eye.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main objective is to amend the Taiwan Allies International Protection and Enhancement Initiative (TAIPEI) Act of 2019 to counter China's attempts to distort international organizations' decisions regarding Taiwan. The bill aims to solidify US opposition to any Chinese efforts to change Taiwan's status without the consent of its people.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill makes several key changes:

1. Clarifies that United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 (XXVI) did not address Taiwan's representation or sovereignty. 2. Instructs US representatives in international organizations to resist China's efforts to distort decisions, language, policies, or procedures regarding Taiwan. 3. Encourages US allies and partners to oppose China's attempts to undermine Taiwan's diplomatic relationships and partnerships.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The main players here are:

1. The United States 2. Taiwan 3. China (the People's Republic of China) 4. International organizations, such as the United Nations

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Now, this is where things get interesting. On the surface, this bill seems like a noble effort to support Taiwan and counter Chinese aggression. But consider this:

* By explicitly opposing China's efforts to change Taiwan's status, are we not, in effect, taking sides in a complex geopolitical conflict? * What about the potential backlash from China? Could this escalate tensions between the US and China? * And what about the implications for international organizations? Are we setting a precedent for the US to dictate policies within these organizations?

You see, folks, this bill might seem like a straightforward show of support, but it's really a complex web of geopolitics and power plays. Wake up, sheeple! The truth is out there, hidden in plain sight.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Deep breath) Folks, gather 'round! We've got a real doozy of a bill on our hands here. The Taiwan International Solidarity Act, S 2224, is a masterclass in... well, let's just say "creative diplomacy." (wink)

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This bill aims to amend the Taiwan Allies International Protection and Enhancement Initiative (TAIPEI) Act of 2019. Its primary objective? To ensure that the United States opposes any attempts by China to strong-arm international organizations into recognizing Taiwan as part of the People's Republic. You know, because freedom. (smirk)

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill makes several key changes:

* It clarifies that the United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 (XXVI) did not address Taiwan's representation or sovereignty. * The US will now instruct its representatives in international organizations to resist China's efforts to distort decisions, language, policies, or procedures regarding Taiwan. * The bill encourages US allies and partners to oppose China's attempts to undermine Taiwan's diplomatic relationships.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Well, this one's a no-brainer. The main players here are:

* Taiwan (obviously) * China (the "bad guy" in our little drama) * The United States (playing the role of "champion of freedom") * International organizations (like the UN)

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Now, this is where things get interesting. If passed, this bill could:

* Escalate tensions between the US and China (because who doesn't love a good game of diplomatic chicken?) * Strengthen Taiwan's position on the world stage * Create new opportunities for US-Taiwan cooperation (read: more arms deals) * Possibly lead to a reevaluation of the "One China" policy (but let's not get too excited, folks)

In conclusion, this bill is a beautiful example of... well, I'm not quite sure what it's an example of, but it's certainly entertaining. (smirk) Stay tuned, folks! The drama is just beginning.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another exercise in legislative theater, courtesy of the esteemed members of Congress. Let's dissect this farce and uncover the real motivations behind S 2224, the Taiwan International Solidarity Act.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's stated purpose is to amend the Taiwan Allies International Protection and Enhancement Initiative (TAIPEI) Act of 2019 to counter China's attempts to distort international organizations' decisions regarding Taiwan. In reality, this bill is a thinly veiled attempt to pander to Taiwanese-American voters, curry favor with the defense industry, and perpetuate the illusion that Congress cares about human rights.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill makes several changes to existing law, including:

* Clarifying that United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 (XXVI) did not address Taiwan's representation or sovereignty * Instructing US representatives in international organizations to resist China's efforts to distort decisions regarding Taiwan * Encouraging US allies and partners to oppose China's attempts to undermine Taiwan's diplomatic relationships

These provisions are nothing more than a rehashing of existing policy, with a few tweaks to make it seem like Congress is actually doing something. It's legislative lip service.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects:

* Taiwanese-American voters, who will be treated to a show of solidarity from their elected representatives * The defense industry, which will continue to reap the benefits of US military aid to Taiwan * China, which will likely respond with more saber-rattling and diplomatic posturing

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill will have zero tangible impact on the situation in Taiwan or China. It's a symbolic gesture, meant to placate certain constituencies rather than effect meaningful change.

In reality, this bill is a symptom of a deeper disease: Congress's addiction to grandstanding and its inability to address complex issues with nuance. The real motivations behind this bill are:

* Ego-stroking for the sponsors (Van Hollen and Curtis) * Pandering to Taiwanese-American voters * Perpetuating the military-industrial complex

The Taiwan International Solidarity Act is a prime example of legislative theater, designed to distract from the real issues facing our nation. It's a waste of time, money, and resources – but hey, at least it makes for good soundbites.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**Taiwan International Solidarity Act (S. 2224)**

**Main Purpose and Objectives:** The Taiwan International Solidarity Act aims to strengthen the United States' support for Taiwan's international participation and resist China's efforts to distort Taiwan's status in international organizations. The bill seeks to promote Taiwan's sovereignty, security, and dignity on the global stage.

**Key Provisions and Changes to Existing Law:**

1. **Clarification of UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 (XXVI)**: The bill clarifies that this resolution did not address Taiwan's representation or sovereignty. 2. **US Advocacy in International Organizations**: The US will instruct its representatives to resist China's efforts to distort decisions, language, policies, or procedures regarding Taiwan in international organizations. 3. **Opposing China's Efforts to Undermine Taiwan's Ties**: The bill encourages the US and its allies to oppose China's attempts to undermine Taiwan's diplomatic relationships and partnerships.

**Affected Parties and Stakeholders:**

1. **Taiwan**: The primary beneficiary of this legislation, which aims to promote its sovereignty and international participation. 2. **China (People's Republic of China)**: The bill directly counters China's efforts to influence Taiwan's status in international organizations. 3. **United States**: As a member of various international organizations, the US will play a key role in advocating for Taiwan's interests. 4. **International Organizations**: Organizations such as the United Nations, World Health Organization, and others where Taiwan seeks participation or membership.

**Potential Impact and Implications:**

1. **Enhanced International Support for Taiwan**: The bill may lead to increased recognition of Taiwan's sovereignty and international participation. 2. **Strained US-China Relations**: China may view this legislation as an attempt to undermine its "One China" policy, potentially straining bilateral relations with the US. 3. **Increased Tensions in the Asia-Pacific Region**: The bill could contribute to escalating tensions between China and Taiwan, as well as among other regional actors.

Overall, the Taiwan International Solidarity Act aims to strengthen the US-Taiwan relationship and promote Taiwan's international participation, while countering China's efforts to influence Taiwan's status.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (neutral personality)

I'm stoked to break down this bill for you, bro! The Taiwan International Solidarity Act (S 2224) is all about supporting Taiwan's sovereignty and opposing China's attempts to mess with it on the international stage.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main goal of this bill is to clarify the US position on Taiwan's status and to counter China's efforts to distort the decisions, language, policies, or procedures of international organizations regarding Taiwan. It aims to promote a more nuanced understanding of the complex relationship between Taiwan, China, and the global community.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends the Taiwan Allies International Protection and Enhancement Initiative (TAIPEI) Act of 2019 in several key ways:

* Clarifies that United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 (XXVI) did not address Taiwan's representation or sovereignty. * States that the US opposes any initiative to change Taiwan's status without the consent of its people. * Instructs US representatives in international organizations to advocate for resisting China's efforts to distort decisions, language, policies, or procedures regarding Taiwan. * Encourages US allies and partners to oppose China's attempts to undermine Taiwan's diplomatic relationships and partnerships.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** This bill affects several key players:

* Taiwan: The bill aims to support Taiwan's sovereignty and international participation. * China: The bill opposes China's efforts to distort the decisions, language, policies, or procedures of international organizations regarding Taiwan. * US Government: The bill instructs US representatives in international organizations to advocate for resisting China's efforts. * International Organizations: The bill affects the way international organizations address Taiwan's status and participation.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill has significant implications for the complex relationship between Taiwan, China, and the global community:

* It sends a strong signal that the US supports Taiwan's sovereignty and opposes China's attempts to undermine it. * It may lead to increased tensions between the US and China on the international stage. * It could impact Taiwan's participation in international organizations and its diplomatic relationships with other countries.

In conclusion, this bill is all about promoting a more nuanced understanding of the complex relationship between Taiwan, China, and the global community. It's like trying to catch a gnarly wave – you gotta be aware of the currents and riptides, bro!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**Taiwan International Solidarity Act (S 2224)**

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The Taiwan International Solidarity Act aims to strengthen the United States' support for Taiwan's international participation and resist China's efforts to isolate Taiwan diplomatically. The bill seeks to amend the Taiwan Allies International Protection and Enhancement Initiative (TAIPEI) Act of 2019 to counter China's attempts to distort decisions, language, policies, or procedures in international organizations regarding Taiwan.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The bill makes several key changes to existing law:

1. Clarifies that United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 (XXVI) did not address Taiwan's representation or sovereignty. 2. Instructs U.S. representatives in international organizations to oppose China's efforts to distort decisions, language, policies, or procedures regarding Taiwan. 3. Encourages U.S. allies and partners to resist China's attempts to undermine Taiwan's diplomatic relationships and partnerships.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

The bill affects several parties and stakeholders:

1. **Taiwan**: The bill aims to strengthen Taiwan's international participation and resist China's efforts to isolate it diplomatically. 2. **China**: The bill directly counters China's attempts to distort decisions, language, policies, or procedures in international organizations regarding Taiwan. 3. **United States**: The bill instructs U.S. representatives in international organizations to take a stronger stance against China's efforts to undermine Taiwan's status. 4. **International Organizations**: The bill affects the United Nations and other international organizations where Taiwan's status is disputed.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

The bill has significant implications for Taiwan-China relations, U.S.-China relations, and global governance:

1. **Escalating tensions**: The bill may escalate tensions between China and Taiwan, as well as between China and the United States. 2. **Increased diplomatic support**: The bill provides a stronger foundation for Taiwan's international participation and may lead to increased diplomatic support from other countries. 3. **Global governance implications**: The bill highlights the challenges of navigating complex global governance issues, particularly when they involve sensitive sovereignty disputes.

**Monied Interest Analysis**

While there are no direct financial interests explicitly mentioned in the bill, several organizations and industries have a vested interest in Taiwan-China relations:

1. **Taiwanese-American business groups**: Organizations like the Taiwanese American Chamber of Commerce may support the bill as it strengthens U.S.-Taiwan economic ties. 2. **Defense contractors**: Companies with significant defense contracts in Taiwan, such as Lockheed Martin or Boeing, may also support the bill as it reinforces U.S. security commitments to Taiwan. 3. **China-focused lobby groups**: Organizations like the China-U.S. Exchange Foundation or the National Committee on United States-China Relations may oppose the bill as it counters China's diplomatic efforts.

These interests are not explicitly mentioned in the bill, but they have a stake in the outcome and may influence lawmakers through lobbying efforts.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Sen. Van Hollen, Chris [D-MD]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$71,400

15 donors

PACs

Organizations

$2,000

Committees

Individuals

$69,400

No PAC contributions found

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

2 transactions

$2,000

No committee contributions found

HUSAIN, NOMAAN K.

2 transactions

$6,600

JAVED, MOHAMMAD SHAHID

2 transactions

$6,600

JAVED, MUHAMMAD TAHIR

2 transactions

$6,600

KHAWAJA, OMAR

2 transactions

$6,600

CHEN, YU

2 transactions

$6,600

ZHAO, PENG

2 transactions

$6,600

BROE, PATRICK

1 transaction

$5,000

BROE, PAULA

1 transaction

$5,000

FUSTOK, OMAR

1 transaction

$3,300

SHARIF, ROOZBEH

1 transaction

$3,300

ADAYA, SALIM

1 transaction

$3,300

DEBBANE, RAY

1 transaction

$3,300

FARES, NIJAD

1 transaction

$3,300

GORDON, PATRICIA

1 transaction

$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 1 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Sen. Curtis, John R. [R-UT]

ID: C001114

Top Contributors

KELLER INVESTMENTS PROPERTIES

OrganizationCENTERVILLE, UT

$29,800

Dec 31, 2023

SUQUAMISH INDIAN TRIBE

OrganizationSUQUAMISH, WA

$1,000

Aug 14, 2024

TENNIS & SUN LC

OrganizationSALT LAKE CITY, UT

$1,000

Jun 10, 2024

BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, LLC

OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC

$1,000

Mar 25, 2024

FUGAL COMMERCIAL SERVICES INC

OrganizationSALT LAKE CITY, UT

$1,000

Sep 13, 2023

STEEL, SHAWN

STEEL & EISNER, LLP • ATTORNEY

IndividualSURFSIDE, CA

$10,000

Mar 25, 2024

STEEL, SHAWN

STEEL & EISNER, LLP • ATTORNEY

IndividualSURFSIDE, CA

$10,000

Mar 25, 2024

BAKER, PAUL

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualTUCSON, AZ

$6,600

Jun 5, 2024

BAKER, PAUL

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualTUCSON, AZ

$6,600

Jun 5, 2024

BERKLEY, WILLIAM

WRBC • CHAIRMAN

IndividualKEY LARGO, FL

$6,600

Jun 7, 2024

Donor Network - Sen. Van Hollen, Chris [D-MD]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 43 nodes and 25 connections (54 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $103,200

Top Donors - Sen. Van Hollen, Chris [D-MD]

Showing top 15 donors by contribution amount

1 Org14 Individuals

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of State

Strong

Vector: 63%

Pages: 223-225AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill aligns with Project 2025's emphasis on resisting undue influence in international organizations, promoting U.S. interests, and countering actions that undermine sovereignty—particularly regarding Taiwan's status and China's efforts to distort international decisions. Both advocate for assertive U.S. engagement in multilateral forums to defend national interests and sovereignty."

Key themes:international organization reformcountering Chinese influencesovereignty promotionU.S. advocacy in multilateral bodiesresisting external pressure on Taiwan

— 191 — Department of State nations, but it is not the only option—and American diplomats should be clear- eyed about international organizations’ strengths and weaknesses. When such institutions act against U.S. interests, the United States must be prepared to take appropriate steps in response, up to and including withdrawal. The manifest failure and corruption of the World Health Organization (WHO) during the COVID-19 pandemic is an example of the danger that international organizations pose to U.S. citizens and interests. The next Administration must end blind support for international organi- zations. If an international organization is effective and advances American interests, the United States should support it. If an international organization is ineffective or does not support American interests, the United States should not support it. Those that are effective will still require constant pressure from U.S. officials to ensure that they remain effective. Serious consideration should also be given to withdrawal from organizations that no longer have value, quietly undermine U.S. interests or goals, or disproportionately rely on U.S. financial con- tributions to survive. The Trump Administration’s “tough love” approach to international organiza- tions served American interests. For example, the Trump Administration withdrew from, or terminated funding for, the United Nations Human Rights Council, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency, and the WHO. The results were redeployment of taxpayer dollars to better uses—and other organizations “getting the message” that the United States will not allow itself and its money to be used to undermine its own interests. The Biden Administration reversed many of these decisions. Currently, U.S. funding for international organizations is more than $16 billion in fiscal year 2021—a sharp increase from $10.8 billion in fiscal year 2015.19 Millions of American taxpayer dollars go to support policies and initiatives that hurt the United States and American citizens. The next Administration should direct the Secretary of State to initiate a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis of U.S. participation in all international organizations. This review should take into account long-standing provisions in federal law that prohibit the use of taxpayer dollars to promote abortion, popu- lation control, and terrorist activities, as well as other applicable restrictions on funding for international organizations and agencies with a view to withholding U.S. funds in cases of abuses. International organizations should not be used to promote radical social pol- icies as if they were human rights priorities. Doing so undermines actual human rights and weakens U.S. credibility abroad. The next Administration should use its voice, influence, votes, and funding in international organizations to pro- mote authentic human rights and respect for sovereignty based on the binding — 192 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise international obligations contained in treaties that have been constitutionally ratified by the U.S. government. It must promote a strict text-based interpreta- tion of treaty obligations that does not consider human rights treaties as “living instruments” both within the State Department and within international organi- zations that receive U.S. funding, including by making respect for sovereignty and authentic human rights a litmus test of personnel decisions and elections processes within international organizations. The U.S. Commission on Unalienable Human Rights focused on the primacy of civil and political rights in its inaugural report, which remains an important guidepost for bilateral and multilateral engagements on human rights. The com- mission’s report is a roadmap for revamping and reenergizing U.S. human rights policy and should be the basis for both structural and policy changes throughout the State Department.20 All U.S. multilateral engagements must be reevaluated in light of the work of the commission, and initiatives that promote controversial policies must be halted and rolled back. It is paramount to create a healthy culture of respect for life, the family, sover- eignty, and authentic human rights in international organizations and agencies. To support this goal, the U.S. led an effort during the Trump Administration to forge a consensus among like-minded countries in support of human life, women’s health, support of the family as the basic unit of human society, and defense of national sovereignty. The result was the Geneva Consensus Declaration on Women’s Health and Protection of the Family.21 All U.S. foreign policy engagements that were pro- duced and expanded under the Obama and Biden Administrations must be aligned with the Geneva Consensus Declaration and the work of the U.S. Commission on Unalienable Human Rights. The U.S. government should not and cannot promote or fund abortion in inter- national programs or multilateral organizations. Technically, the United States can prevent its international funding from going toward abortions, but the U.S. will have a greater impact by including like-minded nations and building on the coali- tion launched through the Geneva Consensus Declaration, with a view to shaping the work of international agencies by functioning as a united front. The COVID-19 pandemic made it painfully clear that both international organi- zations—and some countries—are only too willing to trample human rights in the name of public health. For example, the WHO was, and remains, willing to support the suppression of basic human rights, partially because of its close relationship with human rights abusers like the PRC. The next Administration should unequivocally embrace the premise that humanity and the international community can simultaneously tackle pandem- ics and other emergent health threats without impeding the rights of people. It must also become a vocal surrogate for people in countries where rights are being suppressed in the name of health. This will likely require greater restrictions on

Trade

Strong

Vector: 60%

Pages: 834-836AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill aligns strongly with Project 2025's trade policy objective of strengthening diplomatic pressure against Beijing and supporting Taiwan as a trade partner, particularly through advocating for Taiwan's inclusion in international frameworks and resisting Chinese coercion."

Key themes:Taiwan trade relationsCountering China's influenceInternational organization advocacyDiplomatic pressure on Beijing

— 801 — Trade l Repeal the Jones Act,48 a century-old “Buy American” maritime law that has decimated the U.S. shipbuilding industry. l Work with Congress to restore the President’s Trade Promotion Authority, which would expedite the negotiation of trade agreements with the United Kingdom, Switzerland, Taiwan, the European Union, and other allies, and keep trade-unrelated provisions out of trade agreements. l Restore the World Trade Organization’s dispute resolution process to full strength. l Create a successor to the WTO (assuming that it has been fatally wounded) that is open only to liberal democracies. This would prevent authoritarian countries like China from abusing the organization for their own ends. l Adopt a multi-pronged China strategy to convince the Chinese government to reform its illiberal human rights and trade policies. l Rejoin the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), whose 11 members are developing institutional trade norms in an important geopolitical region without U.S. input or involvement. l Reorient the proposed Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity to focus only on trade issues, which it currently ignores in favor of progressive wish-list policies. l Strengthen diplomatic pressure (in concert with allies) against Beijing’s abuses. Encourage cultural and intellectual engagement with the Chinese people, remembering that blue jeans and rock ’n’ roll helped to win the Cold War. Tariff Relief. When people try something repeatedly and it still doesn’t work, they should stop doing it—especially when the consequences turn out to be just what conservative economists have long predicted they would be.49 With tariffs, the proper reform is not only to get rid of the individual tariffs that have backfired, but also to build institutional safeguards against future abuse. We are five years into the biggest experiment with tariffs since the Great Depres- sion, and the results are in: The new tariffs raise consumer prices for ordinary Americans by about $1,200 per household every year50 and benefit only a small number of special interests. Steel and aluminum tariffs, enacted on national security grounds, angered allies. Beijing made not a single substantive reform in

Section 2: The Common Defense

Moderate

Vector: 60%

Pages: 125-127AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"Both the bill and Project 2025 aim to counter China's efforts to undermine Taiwan's status and support Taiwan's sovereignty, but the bill focuses on diplomatic and international organizational advocacy while Project 2025 emphasizes military denial defense, burden-sharing, and nuclear modernization."

Key themes:China threatTaiwan supportInternational advocacyDenial defense conceptSovereignty

— 93 — Department of Defense U.S. access to the world’s most important market. Preventing this from happening must be the top priority for American foreign and defense policy. Beijing presents a challenge to American interests across the domains of national power, but the military threat that it poses is especially acute and signif- icant. China is undertaking a historic military buildup that includes increasing capability for power projection not only in its own region, but also far beyond as well as a dramatic expansion of its nuclear forces that could result in a nuclear force that matches or exceeds America’s own nuclear arsenal. The most severe immediate threat that Beijing’s military poses, however, is to Taiwan and other U.S. allies along the first island chain in the Western Pacific. If China could subordinate Taiwan or allies like the Philippines, South Korea, and Japan, it could break apart any balancing coalition that is designed to prevent Bei- jing’s hegemony over Asia. Accordingly, the United States must ensure that China does not succeed. This requires a denial defense: the ability to make the subordi- nation of Taiwan or other U.S. allies in Asia prohibitively difficult. Critically, the United States must be able to do this at a level of cost and risk that Americans are willing to bear given the relative importance of Taiwan to China and to the U.S. The United States and its allies also face real threats from Russia, as evidenced by Vladimir Putin’s brutal war in Ukraine, as well as from Iran, North Korea, and transnational terrorism at a time when decades of ill-advised military operations in the Greater Middle East, the atrophy of our defense industrial base, the impact of sequestration, and effective disarmament by many U.S. allies have exacted a high toll on America’s military. This is a grim landscape. The United States needs to deal with these threats forthrightly and with strength, but it also needs to be realistic. It cannot wish away these problems. Rather, it must confront them with a clear-eyed recognition of the need for choice, discipline, and adequate resources for defense. In this light, U.S. defense strategy must identify China unequivocally as the top priority for U.S. defense planning while modernizing and expanding the U.S. nuclear arsenal and sustaining an efficient and effective counterterrorism enterprise. U.S. allies must also step up, with some joining the United States in taking on China in Asia while others take more of a lead in dealing with threats from Russia in Europe, Iran, the Middle East, and North Korea. The reality is that achieving these goals will require more spending on defense, both by the United States and by its allies, as well as active support for reindustrialization and more support for allies’ productive capacity so that we can scale our free- world efforts together. Needed Reforms l Prioritize a denial defense against China. U.S. defense planning should focus on China and, in particular, the effective denial defense of Taiwan. — 94 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise This focus and priority for U.S. defense activities will deny China the first island chain. 1. Require that all U.S. defense efforts, from force planning to employment and posture, focus on ensuring the ability of American forces to prevail in the pacing scenario and deny China a fait accompli against Taiwan. 2. Prioritize the U.S. conventional force planning construct to defeat a Chinese invasion of Taiwan before allocating resources to other missions, such as simultaneously fighting another conflict. l Increase allied conventional defense burden-sharing. U.S. allies must take far greater responsibility for their conventional defense. U.S. allies must play their part not only in dealing with China, but also in dealing with threats from Russia, Iran, and North Korea. 1. Make burden-sharing a central part of U.S. defense strategy with the United States not just helping allies to step up, but strongly encouraging them to do so. 2. Support greater spending and collaboration by Taiwan and allies in the Asia–Pacific like Japan and Australia to create a collective defense model. 3. Transform NATO so that U.S. allies are capable of fielding the great majority of the conventional forces required to deter Russia while relying on the United States primarily for our nuclear deterrent, and select other capabilities while reducing the U.S. force posture in Europe. 4. Sustain support for Israel even as America empowers Gulf partners to take responsibility for their own coastal, air, and missile defenses both individually and working collectively. 5. Enable South Korea to take the lead in its conventional defense against North Korea. l Implement nuclear modernization and expansion. The United States manifestly needs to modernize, adapt, and expand its nuclear arsenal. Russia maintains and is actively brandishing a very large nuclear arsenal, but China is also undertaking a historic nuclear breakout.

Department of State

Weak

Vector: 59%

Pages: 220-222AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on Taiwan's international participation and countering China's influence, while the Project 2025 excerpt emphasizes African military partnerships, European burden-sharing, and Indo-Pacific strategy centered on India and counterterrorism—there is minimal thematic overlap."

Key themes:countering ChinaIndo-Pacific securitydiplomatic engagement

— 187 — Department of State United States, but at least some of them would eventually try if allowed to consolidate their operations and plan such attacks. The immediate threat they pose lies in their abilities and willingness to strike American targets in their regions of operation or to harm U.S. interests in other ways. The U.S. should support capable African military and security operations through the State Department and other federal agencies responsible for granting foreign military education, training, and security assistance. l Build a coalition of the cooperative. Rather than thinning limited federal resources by spreading funds across all countries (including some that are unsupportive or even hostile to the United States,) the next Administration should focus on those countries with which the U.S. can expect a mutually beneficial relationship. After being designated focus countries by the State Department, such nations should receive a full suite of American engagement. That said, the next Administration should still maintain a baseline level of contact even with those countries with which it has less- than-fruitful relationships in order to encourage positive developments and to be in position to seize unexpected diplomatic opportunities as they arise. l Focus on core diplomatic activities, and stop promoting policies birthed in the American culture wars. African nations are particularly (and reasonably) non-receptive to the U.S. social policies such as abortion and pro-LGBT initiatives being imposed on them. The United States should focus on core security, economic, and human rights engagement with African partners and reject the promotion of divisive policies that hurt the deepening of shared goals between the U.S. and its African partners. Europe American foreign policy has long benefited from cooperation with the countries of Europe (generally, the EU), and any conservative Administration should build on this resource. Yet the transatlantic relationship is complex, with security, trade, and political dimensions. First, the Europe, Eurasia, and Russia region is made up of relatively wealthy and technologically advanced societies that should be expected to bear a fair share of both security needs and global security architecture: The United States cannot be expected to provide a defense umbrella for countries unwilling to contribute appropriately. At stake after 2024 will be examining the status of the Wales Pledge of 2 percent of gross domestic product toward defense by NATO members. The new Administration will also want to encourage nations to exceed that pledge. Second, transatlantic trade is a significant part of the global economy, and it is in the U.S. national interest to amplify it, especially because this means weaning — 188 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Europe of its dependence on China. However, there are also transatlantic trade tensions that disturb the U.S.–EU relationship and that have been evident across Administrations. The U.S. must undertake a comprehensive review of trade arrangements between the EU and the United States to assure that U.S. businesses are treated fairly and to build productive reciprocity. Outside the EU, trade with the post-Brexit U.K. needs urgent development before London slips back into the orbit of the EU. Third, in the wake of Brexit, EU foreign policy now takes place without U.K. input, which disadvantages the United States, given that the U.K. has historically been aligned with many U.S. positions. Therefore, U.S. diplomacy must be more attentive to inner-EU developments, while also developing new allies inside the EU—especially the Central European countries on the eastern flank of the EU, which are most vulnerable to Russian aggression. South and Central Asia Many key American interests and responsibilities are found in South and Central Asia. Specifically, continuing to advance the bilateral relationship with India to mutual benefit is a crucial objective for U.S. policy. India plays a crucial role in countering the Chinese threat and securing a free and open Indo–Pacific. It is a critical security guarantor for the key routes of air and sea travel linking East and West and an important emerging U.S. economic partner. For instance, the 2019 Department of Defense Indo–Pacific Strategy Report noted that the Indian Ocean area “is at the nexus of global trade and commerce, with nearly half of the world’s 90,000 commercial vessels and two thirds of global oil trade traveling through its sea lanes. The region boasts some of the fastest-growing economies on Earth.”14 Meanwhile, the threat of transnational terrorism remains acute. The humiliat- ing withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan after a 20-year military campaign has created new challenges. It has provided an opportunity to reset the deeply troubled U.S.–Pakistan relationship and reassess U.S. counterterrorism strategy in the region. The long-standing India–Pakistan rivalry and tensions regarding the disputed territory of Kashmir continue to pose risks to regional stability, especially because both countries are nuclear powers. The State Department’s role in strengthening the regional security and eco- nomic framework linking the U.S and India is crucial. In addition, the department has important functional responsibilities in dealing with a range of threats from nuclear proliferation to transnational proliferation. While American statecraft should also seek to improve bilateral relations throughout the region, U.S. policy must be clear-eyed and realistic about the perfidiousness of the Taliban regime in Afghanistan and the military–political rule in Pakistan. There can be no expecta- tion of normal relations with either.

Department of State

Weak

Vector: 59%

Pages: 220-222AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill centers on Taiwan's international status and countering China's influence, whereas the Project 2025 excerpt focuses on African and European partnerships, core diplomatic priorities, and avoiding culture-war policies. Only broad themes of U.S. diplomatic engagement and resisting adversarial overlap."

Key themes:US foreign policydiplomatic engagementcountering adversarial influenceinternational organizations

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Sen. Van Hollen, Chris

A bill to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3570 Olney Laytonsville Road in Olney, Maryland, as the "Edward L. Ramsey Olney Post Office Building".

119/s/3270

Justice Thurgood Marshall National Historic Site Establishment Act of 2025

119/s/791

Francis G. Newlands Memorial Removal Act

119/s/2369

Back to All Bills