Secure America Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/s/2
Last Updated: September 7, 2026

Sponsored by

Sen. Graham, Lindsey [R-SC]

ID: G000359

Follow the money

The bill

Secure America Act

S. 2, 119th Congress — read as touching Law Enforcement & Surveillance Tech.

The sponsor

Sen. Graham, Lindsey [R-SC]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$130,438 raised

30 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

85% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Homeland Security" section, p. 183-185 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Became Public Law No: 119-98.

June 9, 2026

Introduced

Committee Review

Floor Action

Passed Senate

House Review

Passed Congress

Presidential Action

Became Law

📍 Current Status

This bill has become law!

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. The "Secure America Act" - because, you know, America wasn't secure enough already. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's primary objective is to throw a whopping $63 billion at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for fiscal year 2026, under the guise of "securing America." Because, clearly, the best way to secure a nation is to dump billions of dollars into a bureaucratic black hole. The real purpose? To line the pockets of defense contractors, appease xenophobic voters, and provide a fig leaf for politicians to hide behind.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill allocates funds for various DHS agencies, including U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). It also includes provisions for border security technology, surveillance, and personnel hiring. Oh, and let's not forget the obligatory "combatting child exploitation" clause - because who doesn't love a good moral panic? The changes to existing law are largely cosmetic, designed to create the illusion of action without actually addressing the underlying issues.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects: defense contractors, DHS employees, ICE agents, CBP personnel, and - of course - the politicians who will use this bill as a campaign prop. Oh, and let's not forget the migrants and asylum seekers who will be affected by the bill's provisions - but they don't really count, do they?

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The impact will be minimal, aside from further militarizing the border, enriching defense contractors, and perpetuating the cycle of xenophobia and fear-mongering. The implications? A continued erosion of civil liberties, more efficient ways to funnel taxpayer dollars into the pockets of corporate interests, and a reinforced narrative that America is under siege by "the other." All in all, a resounding success for the politicians and special interest groups who crafted this monstrosity.

In conclusion, the "Secure America Act" is a textbook example of legislative malpractice - a cynical exercise in political posturing, designed to exploit fears and line the pockets of the powerful. It's a disease, really - a symptom of a deeper rot that infects our political system. And we're all just along for the ride, watching as our tax dollars are used to fuel this farce. Joy.

Related Topics

Immigration & Border SecurityNational Security & IntelligenceDefense Spending & Procurement
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Sen. Graham, Lindsey [R-SC]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$130,438
24 donors
PACs
$3,833
Organizations
$6,805
Committees
$0
Individuals
$119,800
1
WINRED PAC
1 transaction
$3,833
1
CATAWBA INDIAN NATION
1 transaction
$3,300
2
BEVERLY B GROSSMAN TRUST
5 transactions
$2,230
3
BELL FAMILY TRUST
1 transaction
$1,000
4
ALFRED SEYMOUR BASSLER TR
2 transactions
$200
5
HURD FAMILY TRUST
1 transaction
$75

No committee contributions found

1
FISHER, KENNETH L.
2 transactions
$13,200
2
BEST, SHERI
1 transaction
$6,600
3
HEGYI, ALBERT
1 transaction
$6,600
4
SUMMEY, ELLIOTT
1 transaction
$6,600
5
KIMBER, DAMON
1 transaction
$6,600
6
GERBER, SANDER R.
1 transaction
$6,600
7
GERBER, TRACY
1 transaction
$6,600
8
FISHER, SHERRILYN
1 transaction
$6,600
9
KAY, ALISON
1 transaction
$6,600
10
WESTBROOK, THAD H.
1 transaction
$6,600
11
MANDELBLATT, DANIELLE
1 transaction
$6,600
12
MANDELBLATT, ERIC
1 transaction
$6,600
13
STOUGHTON, SUSAN
1 transaction
$6,600
14
DETERMAN, MARK
1 transaction
$6,600
15
HILLMAN, TATNALL L. CAPT.
1 transaction
$5,800
16
REGAN, JOHN
1 transaction
$5,000
17
BROWN, MICHAEL MR.
1 transaction
$5,000
18
FROST, PHILLIP
1 transaction
$5,000

Donor Network - Sen. Graham, Lindsey [R-SC]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 58 nodes and 61 connections

Total contributions: $61

Top Donors - Sen. Graham, Lindsey [R-SC]

Showing top 24 donors by contribution amount

1 PAC5 Orgs18 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 4 helped.

  • Sec. 103(a)(4) funds deployment of biometric entry and exit system technology, which benefits surveillance technology vendors.

  • Sec. 202(9) funds detention and removal operations, increasing demand for detention facilities, benefiting private prison operators.

  • +Telecommunicationsconfidence 0.80

    Sec. 103(a)(1) funds procurement of inspection equipment with AI/ML, likely requiring data transmission and networking equipment.

  • +Cybersecurityconfidence 0.75

    Sec. 103(a)(1) funds AI/ML and innovative technologies for narcotics detection, which may involve cybersecurity components for data protection.

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Sen. Graham, Lindsey [R-SC])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HELPS

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Homeland Security

Strong
Vector: 69%
Pages: 183-185AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The Secure America Act aligns strongly with Project 2025's DHS objectives by increasing funding for border security, immigration enforcement, and technology-driven screening—directly supporting goals like enhanced enforcement, reduced parole use, and expanded detention capacity. While it does not explicitly mention asylum agreements or E-Verify mandates, its focus on personnel, technology, and operational funding advances core enforcement priorities."

Key themes:border security fundingimmigration enforcementtechnology and screeningdetention capacityanti-trafficking initiatives

— 151 — Department of Homeland Security l Employment authorization. Along with the legislative proposal, take regulatory action to limit the classes of aliens eligible for work authorization. Executive Orders l Pathways for border crossers 1. Direct the Department of State and the Department of Homeland Security to reinstate Asylum Cooperative Agreements with Northern Triangle Countries immediately. 2. Recommence negotiations with Mexico to fully implement the Remain in Mexico Protocols. 3. Reinstate, to the extent possible, expedited pathways with full credible fear/immigration court process (PACR and HARP). 4. Prohibit the use of Notices to Report, the use of any funds for travel into the interior of the United States, and government flights or transportation for aliens. 5. Mandate that ICE use all detention space in full compliance with Section 235 of the INA, issue weekly reports on detention capacity, and provide authority for low-level temporary capacity (for example, tents) once permanent space is full. 6. Eliminate the use of ATD for border crossers except in rare cases and only with the explicit authority of the Secretary. 7. Prohibit the use of parole except in matters that are certified by the Secretary of Homeland Security as requiring action for humanitarian or significant public benefit reasons, and prohibit the use of parole in any categorical circumstance. l Enforcement 1. Restrict prosecutorial discretion to eliminate it as a “catch-all” excuse for limiting immigration enforcement. 2. Mandate the use of E-Verify for anyone doing business with the government. — 152 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 3. Designate USCIS as Intelligence Community–adjacent, ensuring that it has access to national security and law enforcement databases. 4. Rescind all memoranda limiting enforcement of immigration laws including those identifying sensitive zones. 5. End ICE’s widespread use of termination and administrative closure of cases in immigration court. l Averting or curtailing a mass migration event 1. Provide that whenever the Secretary of Homeland Security determines that an actual or anticipated mass migration of aliens en route to or arriving off the coast of the U.S. presents urgent circumstances requiring an immediate federal response, the Secretary may make, subject to the approval of the President, rules and regulations prohibiting in whole or in part the introduction of persons from such countries or places as he or she shall designate in order to avert or curtail such mass migration and for such period of time as is deemed necessary, including through the expulsion of such aliens. Such rule and regulation making shall not be subject to the requirements of the Administrative Procedures Act. 2. Provide that notwithstanding any other provision of law, when the Secretary makes such a determination and then promulgates, subject to the approval of the President, such rules and regulations, the Secretary shall have the authority to waive all legal requirements of Title 8 that the Secretary, in his or her sole discretion, determines are necessary to avert or curtail the mass migration. Subregulatory Matters l USCIS priorities/structural changes 1. Ensure that focus is returned to vetting, base eligibility of applicants, and fraud detection. 2. Realign the Fraud Detection and National Security Directorate (FDNS) to ensure agencywide consistency on implementation of fraud detection and vetting policies. 3. Review and repeal any internal agency memo that is inconsistent with the priorities described in this chapter.

Department of Homeland Security

Strong
Vector: 68%
Pages: 171-173AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The Secure America Act aligns strongly with Project 2025's DHS objectives by increasing funding for Border Patrol, ICE, technology upgrades (including AI and non-intrusive inspection), and personnel hiring—directly supporting border security, immigration enforcement, and operational efficiency goals outlined in the policy."

Key themes:border security fundingtechnology modernizationICE and CBP personnel expansionnon-intrusive inspection equipmentimmigration enforcement

— 139 — Department of Homeland Security also simultaneously add efficiencies to our nation’s capacity to facilitate lawful trade and travel. The BSIA should establish clear mission requirements, responsibilities, and mandates under existing law regarding the persistent need for and utilization of U.S. military personnel and resources to assist BSIA with increasing whole-of-gov- ernment efforts and long-term strategy to secure our nation’s borders effectively. In addition, appropriate elements within the newly created BSIA should be desig- nated as part of the U.S. National Security and Intelligence Community. A conservative Administration should eliminate any prohibitive guidance, direction, or mandate from DHS or the Administration that curtails or limits CBP from publishing detailed border security and enforcement data not impacting intelligence, interdiction, and investigative operations, methods, or sources. DHS should issue a regulation mandating that CBP publish accurate and timely border security data, readily available to the public, on a regular basis that avoid White House and DHS leadership review and approval. The White House should grant the authority for CBP and DHS executives to utilize component aviation assets under the Office of Air and Marine (OAM). CBP and DHS have worldwide missions with personnel and facilities that are deployed across the globe and in every state in the U.S. With a CBP workforce alone of more than 60,000 people (240,000-plus for DHS) encompassing more than a thousand sea, land, and airports, it is essential that the Commissioner, Deputy Commissioner, Secretary, and Deputy Secretary can travel efficiently to facilities to maintain appropriate situational awareness across the department’s vast mission set and interact with the expansive workforce. Although CBP operates one of the largest aviation components of any domestic U.S. law enforcement agency, executives are prohibited from utilizing the agency’s aviation assets to facilitate official travel. Executives are required to fly on commercial airlines, and this requirement sig- nificantly limits their ability to have classified communications and takes them offline for extended periods of time. Border Patrol (BP) and OAM should be combined within CBP. BP has more than 20,000 personnel, and OAM has approximately 1,800. OAM’s assets are dedicated in support of BP operations the vast majority of the time, yet redundant approv- als, strategies, and independent hierarchal commands serve as impediments to efficient and practical resource deployments. CBP should restart and expand use of the horseback-mounted Border Patrol. As part of this announcement, the Secretary should clear the records and personnel files of those who were falsely accused by Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas of whip- ping migrants and issue a formal apology on behalf of DHS and CBP. The Secretary should combine the Office of Trade (OT) and Trade Relations with the Office of Field Operations (OFO). The OT is the smallest of CBP’s compo- nents, and its operational counterpart, OFO, has a workforce of more than 30,000. — 140 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise OT’s function is interwoven with that of its OFO operational counterpart. Combin- ing OT with OFO would achieve streamlined operations and increase OT’s capacity and capability by leveraging OFO’s expansive resources. CBP, ICE, and USCIS all have authority to issue Notices to Appear (NTA) to removable aliens in their presence, which begins removal proceedings. In most instances, CBP should turn illegal aliens over to ICE for detention, and ICE can then issue any needed NTA. CBP should issue NTAs only in limited situations for humanitarian reasons, such as medical emergencies. In addition, CBP should eliminate use of Notices to Report (NTR) altogether. CBP’s established national standards of Transport, Escort, Detention, and Search (TEDS) have been widely interpreted and expanded by lower courts. This has resulted in unrealistic and differing detention standards for CBP facilities based on the jurisdiction within which they fall, negatively impacting operations. ICE has suffered similarly. A single nationwide detention standard should be codified that prevents individual states from mandating that federal government agencies adhere to widely expansive and ever-changing sets of standards. Such standards should allow the flexibility to use large numbers of temporary facilities such as tents. The annual costs associated with establishing and maintaining temporary facil- ities to address the flow of illegal migration and associated care, transportation, and processing are prohibitive, and CBP’s budget is inadequate. CBP is forced to forgo critical mission-essential endeavors to fund the additional associated costs. Often, this requires the reprogramming of funding at the DHS level, which has a negative impact on other DHS components’ operations. This predictable cost that has to be paid from existing CBP and DHS funding levels reduces CBP’s operational readiness and ability to accomplish its diverse and critical missions to protect the American people. The next President should request a realistic budget that fully pays for these costs. Increased funding is needed for BP to hire additional support personnel, which would relieve uniformed BP agents from administrative duties associated with processing aliens and allow them to return to their national security mission. Congress should increase funding for facility upgrades at strategic land Ports of Entry (POEs), including expanding state-of-the-art technology such as Non-Intru- sive Inspection equipment. Today, the cartels exploit the aging facilities and lack of adequate technology to smuggle illicit drugs, contraband, and more successfully through our nation’s POEs. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE) Needed Reforms Since the formation of DHS, ICE has increasingly been tasked with auxiliary missions that have little or nothing to do with either immigration or customs

Department of Homeland Security

Strong
Vector: 67%
Pages: 174-176AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The Secure America Act aligns strongly with Project 2025's DHS objectives by significantly increasing funding for ICE and CBP personnel, enhancing border security technology, and focusing on combating alien smuggling and trafficking—core priorities in the Project 2025 agenda. Both emphasize expanding enforcement capabilities, increasing detention capacity, and improving vetting and investigative functions within immigration agencies."

Key themes:ICE funding increaseborder security technologyalien smuggling enforcementdetention expansionHSI operational focus

— 142 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Most of the foregoing can be accomplished rapidly and effectively through exec- utive action that is both lawful and appropriate. Additionally, ICE should clarify who is responsible for enforcing its criminal and civil authorities. It should also remove self-imposed limitations on its nationwide jurisdiction. l Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) Special Agents in the 1811 series should enforce Title 8 and 18 crimes as the biggest part of their portfolio. Alien smuggling, trafficking, and cross-border crime as defined under Title 85 and Title 186 should be the focus of ICE operations. l The role of ICE Deportation Officers should be clarified. ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) should be identified as being primarily responsible for enforcing civil immigration regulations, including the civil arrest, detention, and removal of immigration violators anywhere in the United States, without warrant where appropriate, subject only to the civil warrant requirements of the INA where appropriate. l All ICE memoranda identifying “sensitive zones” where ICE personnel are prohibited from operating should be rescinded. Rely on the good judgment of officers in the field to avoid inappropriate situations. l To maximize the efficient use of its resources, ICE should make full use of existing Expedited Removal (ER) authorities. The agency has limited the use of ER to eligible aliens apprehended within 100 miles of the border. This is not a statutory requirement. New Policies U.S. national security and public safety interests would be well-served if ICE were to be combined with CBP and USCIS, as mentioned above. Additionally, ICE/ HSI, along with CBP, should be full participants in the Intelligence Community. The use of Blackies Warrants should be operationalized within ICE. These civil search warrants are commonly used for worksite enforcement when agents have probable cause that illegal aliens are employed at a business. This would stream- line investigations. Safeguarding Americans will require not just securing the border, but con- tinuous vetting and investigations of many aliens who exploited President Biden’s open border for potentially nefarious purposes, including some Afghan evacuees sent directly to the U.S. during America’s disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan. — 143 — Department of Homeland Security Budget l Congress should mandate and fund additional bed space for alien detainees. ICE should be funded for a significant increase in detention space, raising the daily available number of beds to 100,000. l Congress should fund ICE for at least 20,000 ERO officers and 5,000 Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) attorneys. U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS) U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is the agency tasked with administering the legal immigration and certain temporary visa programs. Needed Reforms Since January 2021, USCIS’s priorities have been misaligned, and this has trans- formed it into an open-borders agency, ignoring the critical role that it plays in national security, public safety, and safeguarding the integrity of our immigration system. USCIS should be returned to operating as a screening and vetting agency. Regulatory efforts have focused on easing asylum eligibility in a manner that is guaranteed to exacerbate asylum fraud as people surge at the border. Emphasis also has been placed on removing legal barriers to immigration, such as the use of public benefits. These actions violate statutes, erode congressional intent, and provide a significant magnet for continued illegal immigration. Additionally, USCIS resources have been misappropriated to focus more on creating and expanding large-scale parole and temporary status programs that violate the law and are otherwise contrary to congressional intent instead of focus- ing on a more secure and efficient process for those who are seeking benefits. The ever-increasing number of applications filed has made it difficult to vet applica- tions adequately for eligibility, fraud, and specific national security and public safety problems. The Fraud Detection and National Security Directorate (FDNS) is currently a small directorate with assigned officers reporting through the chain of command in the field, and this has led to stovepiping, lack of coordination in national policy, and inconsistencies throughout the agency. To prioritize vetting and fraud detection, FDNS should undergo a structural shift focused on direct reporting from the field to headquarters, reclassification of leadership, and FDNS directives taking prece- dence over those of other component entities. Correcting the current misalignment of agency priorities and resources should begin with this primary shift in focus to vetting and fraud detection. These actions would reform the agency, returning it to its screening and vetting mission in protecting the homeland. Other structural changes should include reimplementation of the USCIS denat- uralization unit—an effort to maintain integrity in the system by identifying and

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Full Policy Text

Related Bills