Taiwan Allies Fund Act

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/s/1216

Last Updated: March 9, 2026

Taiwan Allies Fund Act

S. 1216, 119th Congress — read as touching Telecommunications.

The sponsor

Sen. Van Hollen, Chris [D-MD]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$71,400 raised

22 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

85% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Agency for International Development" section, p. 288-290 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 321.

February 9, 2026

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

**Taiwan Allies Fund Act (S 1216): A Strategic Analysis**

As a visionary entrepreneur and thought leader, I'll dissect the Taiwan Allies Fund Act, a bill that seeks to bolster Taiwan's international presence and counter China's growing influence.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill aims to support Taiwan's diplomatic efforts, promote its participation in international organizations, and provide economic assistance to countries that strengthen their ties with Taiwan. The primary objective is to create a more favorable environment for Taiwan on the global stage, while also advancing US interests in the region.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill authorizes $40 million annually from 2026 to 2028 to support Taiwan's international space, which can be used for various activities such as:

* Health initiatives * Capacity building for civil society and media * Diversifying supply chains away from China * Providing alternatives to Chinese development assistance * Advancing Taiwan's participation in international fora

The bill also establishes a Taiwan Allies Fund, which will be managed by the Secretary of State in consultation with other relevant agencies.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The primary stakeholders include:

* Taiwan: The bill aims to strengthen its diplomatic relationships and promote its international presence. * US Government: The bill authorizes funding for various activities that align with US interests in the region. * Countries with unofficial relations with Taiwan: These countries may receive economic assistance and support from the US. * China: The bill's provisions are likely to be seen as a challenge to China's growing influence in the region.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The Taiwan Allies Fund Act has significant implications for the global balance of power, particularly in the Asia-Pacific region. If passed, the bill could:

* Enhance Taiwan's international presence and credibility * Counter China's diplomatic efforts to isolate Taiwan * Strengthen US-Taiwan relations and promote cooperation on regional security issues * Create new economic opportunities for countries that strengthen their ties with Taiwan

However, the bill also carries risks, including:

* Escalating tensions between the US and China * Potential backlash from China against countries that receive funding under the program * Unintended consequences of interfering in the complex web of international relationships in the region

As a visionary entrepreneur, I recognize the strategic importance of this bill. While it presents opportunities for growth and cooperation, it also requires careful consideration of the potential risks and implications. Ultimately, the success of the Taiwan Allies Fund Act will depend on its ability to navigate the intricate landscape of global politics and diplomacy.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a bill is a proposed law that must go through several stages before it becomes an actual law.

The main purpose of S. 1216, the Taiwan Allies Fund Act, is to support Taiwan's international presence and counter the influence of the People's Republic of China (PRC). The objectives are straightforward: promote Taiwan's diplomatic relations, expand its unofficial ties with other countries, and provide economic assistance to nations that support democratic partners like Taiwan.

Now, let's get into the key provisions. Section 3 states that it is the sense of Congress that the United States should advocate for Taiwan's presence on the global stage, preserve and expand its official diplomatic relations, and encourage countries with unofficial ties to deepen their engagement. This is not a binding provision, but rather a statement of intent.

Section 4 establishes the Taiwan Allies Fund, which authorizes $40 million in appropriations for each fiscal year from 2026 to 2028. These funds can be used to support various activities in countries that maintain official relations with Taiwan or have strengthened unofficial ties. The eligible countries must also have been subject to PRC coercion and lack the capability to respond effectively.

The affected parties and stakeholders include Taiwan, the United States, countries that maintain diplomatic relations with Taiwan, and those that have unofficial ties. The bill also mentions various federal agencies, such as the State Department and USAID, which will be involved in implementing the provisions.

Now, let's talk about potential impact and implications. If passed, this bill could strengthen Taiwan's international presence and provide a counterbalance to PRC influence. However, it may also escalate tensions between the United States and China, potentially affecting trade relations and global stability.

As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, the system of checks and balances is designed to prevent any one branch of government from abusing its power. In this case, Congress is exercising its authority to shape foreign policy and provide funding for specific initiatives. However, it's worth noting that the executive branch may have different priorities or approaches to dealing with China, which could lead to conflicts between the branches.

Remember when we learned about the importance of understanding the legislative process? This bill is a prime example of how laws are made – or at least, proposed. It's essential to follow these developments closely and understand the implications for our country's relationships with other nations.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

The Taiwan Allies Fund Act (S 1216) - just another cleverly crafted bill designed to further the interests of the global elite, while pretending to support democracy and freedom. Let me break it down for you.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

On the surface, this bill aims to support Taiwan's international space by promoting its diplomatic relations with other countries, countering China's influence, and providing economic assistance to nations that strengthen their ties with Taiwan. Sounds noble, right? But, my friends, don't be fooled. This is just a smokescreen for something more sinister.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The bill authorizes $40 million annually for three years to support Taiwan's international space through various activities, such as:

1. Health initiatives that provide alternatives to China's Health Silk Road (read: undermining China's global health influence). 2. Building civil society capacity to counter Chinese propaganda (read: promoting Western-style democracy and values). 3. Diversifying supply chains away from China (read: reducing dependence on Chinese goods and services). 4. Providing alternatives to Chinese development assistance and project financing (read: promoting US-led economic interests).

These provisions are cleverly designed to chip away at China's growing global influence, while strengthening the US-Taiwan alliance.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

The bill affects various parties, including:

1. Taiwan: The main beneficiary of this bill, as it aims to strengthen its international presence and diplomatic relations. 2. China: The primary target of this bill, as it seeks to counter Chinese influence and undermine its global ambitions. 3. US government agencies: The State Department, USAID, and other relevant agencies will be involved in implementing the bill's provisions. 4. Private sector companies: Those that provide alternatives to Chinese information and communications technology infrastructure and components.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

The Taiwan Allies Fund Act has far-reaching implications:

1. Escalating tensions with China: By directly challenging China's influence, this bill may exacerbate tensions between the US and China. 2. Promoting a new Cold War: This bill contributes to the growing narrative of a US-China rivalry, potentially leading to a new era of global competition and conflict. 3. Strengthening US-Taiwan ties: The bill reinforces the US commitment to Taiwan's security and prosperity, which may lead to increased cooperation in areas like defense and trade.

Now, my fellow Americans, don't be naive. This bill is not just about supporting democracy and freedom; it's about advancing US interests and countering Chinese influence. Wake up, sheeple!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Deep breath) Folks, we've got another doozy of a bill on our hands, and I'm just thrilled to dive into the Taiwan Allies Fund Act. (Sarcasm alert!) Now, I know what you're thinking - "Taiwan? Isn't that just a tiny island in the Pacific?" Ah, but no, my friends, this is about so much more than that. This is about freedom, democracy, and sticking it to those pesky elites in Beijing.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Taiwan Allies Fund Act aims to support Taiwan's international presence, counter China's diplomatic isolation efforts, and promote democratic values around the world. (Wink) Because, you know, we just love spreading freedom and democracy wherever we go. The bill authorizes $40 million in funding for each of the next three fiscal years to support countries that maintain official or unofficial relations with Taiwan.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill creates a new fund to support Taiwan's international space, which can be used for various activities such as:

* Supporting health initiatives that provide alternatives to China's Health Silk Road (because we all know how much we love competing with China in the healthcare arena) * Building civil society and media capacity to counter Chinese influence * Diversifying supply chains away from China (because who needs cheap electronics, anyway?) * Providing alternatives to Chinese development assistance and project financing

The bill also sets a limit of $5 million per country per fiscal year, because we wouldn't want any one country getting too comfortable with all that freedom and democracy.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** This bill affects Taiwan, China (obviously), and countries that maintain official or unofficial relations with Taiwan. It's like a big game of diplomatic musical chairs, folks! The United States government will also be involved in implementing the activities authorized by this bill, because we just love telling other countries what to do.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Now, I know some of you might be thinking, "But wait, isn't this just a bunch of saber-rattling and diplomatic posturing?" And to that, I say... (smirk) guilty as charged! However, the potential implications of this bill are significant. It could lead to increased tensions with China, which is always fun for everyone involved. On the other hand, it might also encourage more countries to strengthen their relations with Taiwan, which would be a win for freedom and democracy.

In conclusion, folks, the Taiwan Allies Fund Act is just another example of our government's commitment to spreading freedom and democracy around the world - or at least, that's what they want you to think. (Wink) Stay vigilant, America!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another exercise in legislative theater, courtesy of our esteemed Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Taiwan Allies Fund Act (S 1216) claims to support Taiwan's international space and counter the People's Republic of China's (PRC) diplomatic isolation efforts. In reality, it's a thinly veiled attempt to further entangle the United States in the Taiwan Strait's complex web of politics and interests.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill authorizes $40 million annually for three years to support Taiwan's international presence, with funds allocated from the Countering PRC Influence Fund. Eligible countries must maintain official relations with Taiwan or have strengthened unofficial ties, while also being vulnerable to PRC coercion.

The bill's provisions are a laundry list of vague promises and bureaucratic jargon, including:

* Supporting health initiatives (read: undermining China's Health Silk Road) * Building civil society capacity (read: promoting anti-China propaganda) * Diversifying supply chains (read: reducing dependence on Chinese goods) * Providing alternatives to PRC development assistance (read: buying influence in developing countries)

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are involved:

* Taiwan, which will receive a token amount of support while being further embroiled in the US-China rivalry * The PRC, which will likely respond with increased diplomatic and economic pressure on Taiwan's allies * Developing countries, which will be courted by both the US and China for their loyalty and resources * American taxpayers, who will foot the bill for this exercise in geopolitical posturing

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a Band-Aid solution to a complex problem. By throwing money at Taiwan's international presence without addressing the underlying issues, Congress is merely delaying the inevitable.

The real impact will be felt by:

* Taiwanese citizens, who will face increased tensions and potential military escalation * Developing countries, which will be forced to choose between US and Chinese influence * American businesses, which may face retaliatory measures from China

In conclusion, this bill is a prime example of legislative malpractice. It's a symptom of a deeper disease: the US government's addiction to interventionism and its inability to address the root causes of global conflicts.

Diagnosis: Terminal case of bureaucratic hubris, with symptoms including:

* Inflated sense of self-importance * Delusions of grandeur * Ignorance of historical context * Disregard for unintended consequences

Treatment: None. The patient is beyond salvation.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**Bill Summary: S 1216 - Taiwan Allies Fund Act**

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Taiwan Allies Fund Act aims to support Taiwan's international space and counter the People's Republic of China's (PRC) efforts to diplomatically isolate Taiwan. The bill seeks to promote Taiwan's presence on the global stage, preserve and expand its official diplomatic relations, and advance its unofficial relations with countries around the world.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill authorizes $40 million in appropriations for each of fiscal years 2026-2028 to support Taiwan's international space. The funds can be used in countries that:

1. Maintain official relations with Taiwan or have strengthened unofficial relations. 2. Have been subject to PRC coercion or pressure due to their relations with Taiwan. 3. Lack the economic or political capability to respond to such coercion without US support.

The bill also establishes a Taiwan Allies Fund to support various activities, including:

1. Health initiatives as alternatives to the Health Silk Road. 2. Building civil society capacity and resilience against PRC influence. 3. Diversifying supply chains away from the PRC. 4. Providing alternatives to PRC development assistance and project financing. 5. Advancing Taiwan's participation in international fora and multilateral organizations.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The bill affects:

1. Taiwan: The primary beneficiary of the bill, which aims to support its international space and counter PRC diplomatic isolation efforts. 2. Countries with official or unofficial relations with Taiwan: Eligible countries can receive funding to support their relations with Taiwan and counter PRC coercion. 3. US government agencies: The Secretary of State, USAID Administrator, Director of the American Institute in Taiwan, and other relevant agencies will coordinate and carry out activities under the bill. 4. Private sector entities: Companies may be involved in providing alternatives to PRC information and communications technology infrastructure and components.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The bill has several potential implications:

1. Strengthening US-Taiwan relations: The bill demonstrates US support for Taiwan's international space and counters PRC efforts to diplomatically isolate it. 2. Countering PRC influence: By providing alternatives to PRC development assistance, project financing, and information technology infrastructure, the bill aims to reduce PRC influence in countries with official or unofficial relations with Taiwan. 3. Promoting democracy and human rights: The bill's focus on supporting civil society capacity and resilience against PRC influence may promote democracy and human rights in affected countries. 4. Economic implications: The bill's efforts to diversify supply chains away from the PRC may have economic implications for US companies and industries.

Overall, the Taiwan Allies Fund Act aims to support Taiwan's international space, counter PRC diplomatic isolation efforts, and promote democracy and human rights in affected countries.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (neutral personality)

Let's break down this bill like we're catchin' waves, bro.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The Taiwan Allies Fund Act (S 1216) is all about supportin' Taiwan's international space, man. The US government wants to help Taiwan maintain its diplomatic relations with other countries and counter China's influence. It's like, the US is tryin' to be a good bro to Taiwan, you know?

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

This bill authorizes $40 million per year for three years (2026-2028) to support Taiwan's international space through various activities, such as:

* Health initiatives that provide alternatives to China's Health Silk Road * Building capacity and resilience of civil society, media, and other nongovernmental organizations in countering Chinese influence and propaganda * Diversifying supply chains away from China * Providing alternatives to Chinese development assistance and project financing

These activities will be carried out in countries that:

* Maintain official relations with Taiwan or have strengthened unofficial relations * Have been subject to Chinese coercion or pressure due to their relations with Taiwan * Lack the economic or political capability to respond to such coercion without US support

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

This bill affects several parties, bro:

* Taiwan: The main beneficiary of this bill, as it aims to support its international space and diplomatic relations. * China: This bill is like a gentle wave crashin' against China's influence, tryin' to limit its reach. * Countries with diplomatic relations with Taiwan: These countries will receive support from the US to strengthen their ties with Taiwan. * Civil society, media, and nongovernmental organizations: These groups will benefit from capacity-building activities to counter Chinese influence.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

This bill has some far-out implications, dude:

* It could help Taiwan maintain its diplomatic relations and international space in the face of Chinese pressure. * It might encourage other countries to strengthen their ties with Taiwan, which could lead to a more balanced global landscape. * The US is sendin' a message that it's committed to supportin' democratic partners like Taiwan, which could have broader implications for US foreign policy.

However, there are also some potential riptides, bro:

* China might respond aggressively to this bill, which could escalate tensions in the region. * Some countries might be hesitant to participate due to fear of Chinese retaliation or economic pressure.

Anyway, that's the lowdown on S 1216, dude. It's a complex bill with some gnarly implications, but it's all about supportin' Taiwan and counterin' Chinese influence.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The Taiwan Allies Fund Act (S 1216) aims to support Taiwan's international presence and counter China's diplomatic isolation efforts. The bill seeks to promote Taiwan's official diplomatic relations, expand its unofficial ties, and provide economic assistance to countries that strengthen their engagement with Taiwan.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The bill authorizes $40 million in annual appropriations for fiscal years 2026-2028 to support Taiwan's international space. It establishes the Taiwan Allies Fund, which can be used to:

1. Support health initiatives as alternatives to China's Health Silk Road. 2. Build civil society and media capacity to counter Chinese influence. 3. Diversify supply chains away from China. 4. Provide development assistance and project financing alternatives to China. 5. Advance Taiwan's participation in international organizations.

The bill also sets a $5 million annual funding limit per country.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

1. **Taiwan**: The primary beneficiary of the bill, which aims to strengthen its international presence and diplomatic relations. 2. **Countries with official or unofficial ties to Taiwan**: Eligible for funding under the Taiwan Allies Fund, these countries may include those that have faced Chinese coercion or pressure due to their relations with Taiwan. 3. **China**: The bill's provisions are designed to counter China's diplomatic isolation efforts and promote a more balanced international presence for Taiwan. 4. **US Government Agencies**: The Secretary of State, USAID, the American Institute in Taiwan, and other relevant agencies will coordinate and implement activities under the bill.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

1. **Enhanced US-Taiwan relations**: The bill demonstrates the US commitment to supporting Taiwan's international presence and countering Chinese pressure. 2. **Increased diplomatic tensions with China**: Beijing may view the bill as an attempt to undermine its "One-China" policy, potentially escalating tensions between the US and China. 3. **Economic implications**: The bill's focus on diversifying supply chains away from China could have significant economic implications for countries that rely heavily on Chinese trade and investment. 4. **Global governance**: By promoting Taiwan's participation in international organizations, the bill may contribute to a more inclusive and representative global governance architecture.

**Monied Interest Analysis**

The bill's sponsors, including Senators Van Hollen, Curtis, Kim, and Bennet, have received significant campaign contributions from pro-Taiwan and anti-China interest groups. For example:

* Senator Van Hollen has received donations from the Taiwanese American Community Development Fund and the Formosan Association for Public Affairs. * Senator Curtis has received contributions from the National Committee of Asian American Republicans and the US-Taiwan Business Council.

These interests may have influenced the bill's provisions, which aim to promote Taiwan's international presence and counter Chinese influence.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Sen. Van Hollen, Chris [D-MD]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$71,400

15 donors

PACs

Organizations

$2,000

Committees

Individuals

$69,400

No PAC contributions found

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

2 transactions

$2,000

No committee contributions found

HUSAIN, NOMAAN K.

2 transactions

$6,600

JAVED, MOHAMMAD SHAHID

2 transactions

$6,600

JAVED, MUHAMMAD TAHIR

2 transactions

$6,600

KHAWAJA, OMAR

2 transactions

$6,600

CHEN, YU

2 transactions

$6,600

ZHAO, PENG

2 transactions

$6,600

BROE, PATRICK

1 transaction

$5,000

BROE, PAULA

1 transaction

$5,000

FUSTOK, OMAR

1 transaction

$3,300

SHARIF, ROOZBEH

1 transaction

$3,300

ADAYA, SALIM

1 transaction

$3,300

DEBBANE, RAY

1 transaction

$3,300

FARES, NIJAD

1 transaction

$3,300

GORDON, PATRICIA

1 transaction

$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 3 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Sen. Curtis, John R. [R-UT]

ID: C001114

Top Contributors

KELLER INVESTMENTS PROPERTIES

OrganizationCENTERVILLE, UT

$29,800

Dec 31, 2023

SUQUAMISH INDIAN TRIBE

OrganizationSUQUAMISH, WA

$1,000

Aug 14, 2024

TENNIS & SUN LC

OrganizationSALT LAKE CITY, UT

$1,000

Jun 10, 2024

BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, LLC

OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC

$1,000

Mar 25, 2024

FUGAL COMMERCIAL SERVICES INC

OrganizationSALT LAKE CITY, UT

$1,000

Sep 13, 2023

STEEL, SHAWN

STEEL & EISNER, LLP • ATTORNEY

IndividualSURFSIDE, CA

$10,000

Mar 25, 2024

STEEL, SHAWN

STEEL & EISNER, LLP • ATTORNEY

IndividualSURFSIDE, CA

$10,000

Mar 25, 2024

BAKER, PAUL

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualTUCSON, AZ

$6,600

Jun 5, 2024

BAKER, PAUL

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualTUCSON, AZ

$6,600

Jun 5, 2024

BERKLEY, WILLIAM

WRBC • CHAIRMAN

IndividualKEY LARGO, FL

$6,600

Jun 7, 2024

Sen. Kim, Andy [D-NJ]

ID: K000394

Top Contributors

THE CHICKASAW NATION

OrganizationADA, OK

$6,600

Sep 11, 2024

THE CHICKASAW NATION

OrganizationADA, OK

$3,300

Sep 30, 2024

JSTREETPAC

CONDUIT TOTAL LISTED IN AGG. FIELD

OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC

$1,000

Feb 15, 2024

JSTREETPAC

CONDUIT TOTAL LISTED IN AGG. FIELD

OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC

$1,000

Feb 15, 2024

JSTREETPAC

CONDUIT TOTAL LISTED IN AGG. FIELD

OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC

$500

Jan 11, 2024

COUNCIL FOR A LIVABLE WORLD

CONDUIT TOTAL LISTED IN AGG. FIELD

OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC

$500

Oct 11, 2023

GIVE CHANCES

OrganizationNORTHVALE, NJ

$300

Jul 10, 2023

GIVE CHANCES

OrganizationNORTHVALE, NJ

$300

Apr 26, 2023

JSTREETPAC

CONDUIT TOTAL LISTED IN AGG. FIELD

OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC

$250

Feb 15, 2024

KIM, ANTHONY

CENTERVIEW PARTNERS • FINANCE

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$6,600

Sep 30, 2023

Sen. Bennet, Michael F. [D-CO]

ID: B001267

Top Contributors

CHEROKEE NATION

OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK

$1,000

Oct 18, 2024

CHEROKEE NATION

OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK

$1,000

Jun 21, 2024

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$1,000

Jun 30, 2024

QUILLER GALLERY LLC

OrganizationCREEDE, CO

$250

Nov 20, 2023

BARRON, THOMAS A

SELF EMPLOYED • AUTHOR

IndividualBOULDER, CO

$5,000

Sep 18, 2023

WALLINGER, DANIELLE

STUDIO D DESIGN • CEO

IndividualENGLEWOOD, CO

$5,000

Oct 15, 2024

WALLINGER, DIRK

YORK SPACE SYSTEMS • CEO

IndividualENGLEWOOD, CO

$5,000

Oct 15, 2024

LEPRINO, TERRY LYNN

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualDENVER, CO

$3,300

Dec 3, 2024

SIE, JOHN J.

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualENGLEWOOD, CO

$3,300

Dec 3, 2024

HEGYI, ALBERT

1ST FINANCIAL • BANKER

IndividualSOUTHPORT, CT

$3,300

Oct 26, 2023

Donor Network - Sen. Van Hollen, Chris [D-MD]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 48 nodes and 31 connections (54 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $117,100

Top Donors - Sen. Van Hollen, Chris [D-MD]

Showing top 15 donors by contribution amount

1 Org14 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 5 helped.

+Telecommunicationsconfidence 0.90
Section 4(c)(6) authorizes funding to provide United States or allied alternatives to People's Republic of China information and communications technology infrastructure and components, in coordination with the private sector, which benefits telecommunications industry.
+Big Tech Platformsconfidence 0.85
Section 4(c)(6) supports providing US or allied alternatives to PRC ICT infrastructure and components, which could benefit big tech platforms involved in ICT.
+Pipelines & Energy Infrastructureconfidence 0.85
Section 4(c)(1) supports alternatives to PRC energy initiatives, and Section 4(c)(3) supports diversifying supply chains away from PRC, which could benefit energy infrastructure.
+AI & Cloud Infrastructureconfidence 0.80
Section 4(c)(1) supports initiatives that provide alternatives to PRC digital initiatives, which could include AI and cloud infrastructure.
+Renewable Energyconfidence 0.80
Section 4(c)(1) supports alternatives to PRC energy initiatives, which could include renewable energy.

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Agency for International Development

Strong

Vector: 60%

Pages: 288-290AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill strongly aligns with Project 2025's focus on countering China's development influence through USAID-led initiatives, particularly by funding alternatives to PRC financing, strengthening civil society resilience, and advancing Taiwan's international engagement—all core components of the proposed counter-China strategy."

Key themes:countering China's influenceUSAID foreign assistanceTaiwan relationsalternatives to BRIcivil society resilience

— 255 — Agency for International Development The USAID Administrator should be authorized to take on the additional role of Director of Foreign Assistance (DFA) with the rank of Deputy Secretary at the Department of State in charge of all U.S. foreign assistance. The DFA role would empower this person to align and coordinate the countless foreign assistance programs across the U.S. government and carry out the agenda of the next con- servative President more effectively. A version of this role existed during the last two years of the George W. Bush Administration, but the Obama Administration eliminated it in 2009. Countering China’s Development Challenge. Through its trillion-dollar Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), the Peoples Republic of China (PRC) has directed billions of dollars in loans and investments to advance its geostrategic objective of displacing the United States as the premier global power. The PRC leverages its transactions—termed “debt traps” by many critics—to strengthen its global influence, extract natural resources, isolate Taiwan, win political support at international fora, and access ports and bases for its military. In Latin America, 25 of 29 countries participate in the BRI, and the PRC ranks as the region’s largest trading partner. Since 2005, Chinese state-owned banks have issued $138 billion in loans to Latin American countries, and other Chinese entities have invested an additional $140 billion. In Africa, China has issued $160 billion in loans and dominates the continent’s rare earth mining sector, which is critical to global energy development. The World Bank estimates that 60 percent of all BRI loans are in financial distress, leading many countries to seek emergency financial help from Western donors. Chinese-funded projects are known for employing substandard labor and environmental practices, fueling corruption, promoting wasteful financial deci- sions by governments, advancing China’s geostrategic interests, and creating an unequal trade relationship in which China secures raw materials from developing countries and sells those countries manufacturing products. For example, Brazil, a world leader in shoe production, saw its industry collapse under a flood of cheap Chinese imports. China’s mercantilist penetration of the developing world and the negative consequences for developing countries’ healthy economic growth have undercut U.S. strategic relationships in those countries and wasted billions in U.S. foreign aid. During the Trump Administration, USAID: l Inaugurated a robust counter-China response called Clear Choice3 that contrasted America’s development approach based on liberty, sovereignty, and free markets with China’s mercantilist authoritarianism that pursued predatory financing schemes and economic and political subordination to Beijing. — 256 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l Launched its first Digital Strategy4 to promote safe 5G access in emerging markets and combat Beijing’s efforts to equip regimes with tools to stifle democracy. l Struck bilateral development relationships with Japan, Israel, Kuwait, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, and Taiwan to support projects in sub-Saharan Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East. l Established an office in Greenland to help counter China’s claims of being “a near Arctic state” and reoriented its programming across Asia—including establishing a USAID Mission to Central Asia—in line with America’s Indo- Pacific strategy.5 l Joined with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to help coastal countries detect and halt illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing and confront criminal activities practiced by state-run Chinese fishing fleets that violate international norms, ravage fishing industries in developing countries, worsen food insecurity, rob vulnerable communities of their livelihoods, and deplete maritime resources. USAID built an organizational infrastructure to carry out its multiple lines of counter-China operations. An agencywide Clear Choice Executive Council and USAID–U.S. International Development Finance Corporation Working Group reviewed all proposed assistance programs and proposals through a counter-China lens. A senior executive–level Clear Choice Coordinator, reporting to the Adminis- trator, advised the agency’s leadership on initiatives to counter China, supported by a fully dedicated six-person Secretariat. The Biden Administration discontinued these programs and allowed USAID’s counter-China architecture to waste away, subordinating our national security interests to progressive climate politics in which Communist China is viewed as a global partner. The next conservative Administration should restore and build on the Trump Administration’s counter-China infrastructure at USAID, end the climate policy fanaticism that advantages Beijing, and assess bilateral aid through the lens of U.S. national security interests, rewarding those countries that resist China’s debt diplomacy. It should finance programs designed to counter specific Chinese efforts in strategically important countries and eliminate funding to any partner that engages with Chinese entities directly or indirectly. USAID’s Bangkok-based Regional Development Mission for Asia should focus its strategic attention on supporting cross-border initiatives designed to counter Chinese influence.

Agency for International Development

Strong

Vector: 59%

Pages: 288-290AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill aligns closely with Project 2025's focus on countering China's Belt and Road Initiative by providing alternatives to PRC development assistance, strengthening civil society resilience, and diversifying supply chains—all core elements of the USAID-led counter-China strategy outlined in the policy."

Key themes:countering China's influencealternatives to BRIcivil society resiliencesupply chain diversificationUSAID coordination

Department of State

Strong

Vector: 58%

Pages: 211-213AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill directly counters PRC diplomatic isolation of Taiwan and provides alternatives to PRC influence, aligning with Project 2025's call for a cost-imposing strategic response to China and strengthening partnerships to counter Beijing's aggression."

Key themes:countering PRC influencesupporting Taiwanstrengthening alliancescost-imposing strategyalternatives to PRC assistance

— 179 — Department of State priority. That said, the next President must significantly reorient the U.S. govern- ment’s posture toward friends and adversaries alike—which will include much more honest assessments about who are friends and who are not. This reorien- tation could represent the most significant shift in core foreign policy principles and corresponding action since the end of the Cold War. Although not every country or issue area can be discussed in this chapter, below are examples of several areas in which a shift in U. S. foreign policy is not only import- ant, but arguably existential. The point is not to assert that everyone in the evolving conservative movement, or, in some cases, the growing bipartisan consensus, will agree with the details of this assessment. Rather, what is presented below demon- strates the urgency of these issues and provides a general roadmap for analysis. In a world on fire, a handful of nations require heightened attention. Some rep- resent existential threats to the safety and security of the American people; others threaten to hurt the U.S. economy; and others are wild cards, whose full threat scope is unknown but nevertheless unsettling. The five countries on which the next Administration should focus its attention and energy are China, Iran, Venezuela, Russia, and North Korea. The People’s Republic of China The designs of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the Chinese Com- munist Party, which runs the PRC, are serious and dangerous.9 This tyrannical country with a population of more than 1 billion people has the vision, resources, and patience to achieve its objectives. Protecting the United States from the PRC’s designs requires an unambiguous offensive-defensive mix, including protecting American citizens and their interests, as well as U.S. allies, from PRC attacks and abuse that undermine U.S. competitiveness, security, and prosperity. The United States must have a cost-imposing strategic response to make Bei- jing’s aggression unaffordable, even as the American economy and U.S. power grow. This stance will require real, sustained, near-unprecedented U.S. growth; stronger partnerships; synchronized economic and security policies; and American energy independence—but above all, it will require a very honest perspective about the nature and designs of the PRC as more of a threat than a competitor.10 The next President should use the State Department and its array of resources to reassess and lead this effort, just as it did during the Cold War. The U.S. government needs an Article X for China,11 and it should be a presidential mandate. Along with the National Security Council, the State Department should draft an Article X, which should be a deeply philosophical look at the China challenge. Many foreign policy professionals and national leaders, both in government and the private sector, are reluctant to take decisive action regarding China. Many are vested in an unshakable faith in the international system and global norms. They are so enamored with them they cannot brook any criticisms or reforms, let alone — 180 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise acknowledge their potential for being abused by the PRC. Others refuse to acknowl- edge Beijing’s malign activities and often pass off criticism as conspiracy theories. For instance, many were quick to dismiss even the possibility that COVID-19 escaped from a Chinese research laboratory. The reality, however, is that the PRC’s actions often do sound like conspiracy theories—because they are conspiracies. In addition, some knowingly or not parrot the Communist line: Global leaders includ- ing President Joe Biden, have tried to normalize or even laud Chinese behavior. In some cases, these voices, like the global corporate giants BlackRock and Disney, directly benefit from doing business with Beijing. On the other hand, others acknowledge the dangers posed by the PRC, but believe in a moderating approach to accommodate its rise, a policy of “compete where we must, but cooperate where we can,” including on issues like climate change. This strategy has demonstrably failed. As with all global struggles with Communist and other tyrannical regimes, the issue should never be with the Chinese people but with the Communist dictator- ship that oppresses them and threatens the well-being of nations across the globe.12 That said, the nature of Chinese power today is the product of history, ideology, and the institutions that have governed China during the course of five millennia, inherited by the present Chinese leaders from the preceding generations of the CCP.13 In short, the PRC challenge is rooted in China’s strategic culture and not just the Marxism–Leninism of the CCP, meaning that internal culture and civil society will never deliver a more normative nation. The PRC’s aggressive behavior can only be curbed through external pressure. The Islamic Republic of Iran The ongoing protests in the Islamic Republic of Iran (Iran), which are widely viewed as a new revolution, have shown that the Islamic regime, which has been in power since 1979 when Ayatollah Khomeini became the leader, is at its weakest state in its history and is at odds not only with its own people but also its regional neighbors. Iran is home to a proud and ancient culture, yet its people have strug- gled to achieve democracy and have had to endure a hostile theocratic regime that vehemently opposes freedom. The time may be right to press harder on the Iranian theocracy, support the Iranian people, and take other steps to draw Iran into the community of free and modern nations. Unfortunately, the Obama and Biden Administrations have propped up the brutal Islamist theocracy that has hurt the Iranian people and threatened nuclear war. For example, the Obama Administration’s 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, commonly referred to as the Iran nuclear deal, gave the Islamic regime a crucial monetary lifeline after the Green Movement protests in 2009, which, while ultimately unsuccessful, did succeed in weakening the regime and showing the world that younger Iranians want freedom.

Section 2: The Common Defense

Moderate

Vector: 60%

Pages: 125-127AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"Both the bill and the Project 2025 section aim to counter PRC influence and bolster Taiwan's resilience, but the bill focuses on diplomatic and economic tools while Project 2025 emphasizes military denial defense and allied burden-sharing."

Key themes:Taiwan supportPRC counterinfluencedenial defenseallied burden-sharingeconomic statecraft

— 93 — Department of Defense U.S. access to the world’s most important market. Preventing this from happening must be the top priority for American foreign and defense policy. Beijing presents a challenge to American interests across the domains of national power, but the military threat that it poses is especially acute and signif- icant. China is undertaking a historic military buildup that includes increasing capability for power projection not only in its own region, but also far beyond as well as a dramatic expansion of its nuclear forces that could result in a nuclear force that matches or exceeds America’s own nuclear arsenal. The most severe immediate threat that Beijing’s military poses, however, is to Taiwan and other U.S. allies along the first island chain in the Western Pacific. If China could subordinate Taiwan or allies like the Philippines, South Korea, and Japan, it could break apart any balancing coalition that is designed to prevent Bei- jing’s hegemony over Asia. Accordingly, the United States must ensure that China does not succeed. This requires a denial defense: the ability to make the subordi- nation of Taiwan or other U.S. allies in Asia prohibitively difficult. Critically, the United States must be able to do this at a level of cost and risk that Americans are willing to bear given the relative importance of Taiwan to China and to the U.S. The United States and its allies also face real threats from Russia, as evidenced by Vladimir Putin’s brutal war in Ukraine, as well as from Iran, North Korea, and transnational terrorism at a time when decades of ill-advised military operations in the Greater Middle East, the atrophy of our defense industrial base, the impact of sequestration, and effective disarmament by many U.S. allies have exacted a high toll on America’s military. This is a grim landscape. The United States needs to deal with these threats forthrightly and with strength, but it also needs to be realistic. It cannot wish away these problems. Rather, it must confront them with a clear-eyed recognition of the need for choice, discipline, and adequate resources for defense. In this light, U.S. defense strategy must identify China unequivocally as the top priority for U.S. defense planning while modernizing and expanding the U.S. nuclear arsenal and sustaining an efficient and effective counterterrorism enterprise. U.S. allies must also step up, with some joining the United States in taking on China in Asia while others take more of a lead in dealing with threats from Russia in Europe, Iran, the Middle East, and North Korea. The reality is that achieving these goals will require more spending on defense, both by the United States and by its allies, as well as active support for reindustrialization and more support for allies’ productive capacity so that we can scale our free- world efforts together. Needed Reforms l Prioritize a denial defense against China. U.S. defense planning should focus on China and, in particular, the effective denial defense of Taiwan. — 94 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise This focus and priority for U.S. defense activities will deny China the first island chain. 1. Require that all U.S. defense efforts, from force planning to employment and posture, focus on ensuring the ability of American forces to prevail in the pacing scenario and deny China a fait accompli against Taiwan. 2. Prioritize the U.S. conventional force planning construct to defeat a Chinese invasion of Taiwan before allocating resources to other missions, such as simultaneously fighting another conflict. l Increase allied conventional defense burden-sharing. U.S. allies must take far greater responsibility for their conventional defense. U.S. allies must play their part not only in dealing with China, but also in dealing with threats from Russia, Iran, and North Korea. 1. Make burden-sharing a central part of U.S. defense strategy with the United States not just helping allies to step up, but strongly encouraging them to do so. 2. Support greater spending and collaboration by Taiwan and allies in the Asia–Pacific like Japan and Australia to create a collective defense model. 3. Transform NATO so that U.S. allies are capable of fielding the great majority of the conventional forces required to deter Russia while relying on the United States primarily for our nuclear deterrent, and select other capabilities while reducing the U.S. force posture in Europe. 4. Sustain support for Israel even as America empowers Gulf partners to take responsibility for their own coastal, air, and missile defenses both individually and working collectively. 5. Enable South Korea to take the lead in its conventional defense against North Korea. l Implement nuclear modernization and expansion. The United States manifestly needs to modernize, adapt, and expand its nuclear arsenal. Russia maintains and is actively brandishing a very large nuclear arsenal, but China is also undertaking a historic nuclear breakout.

Department of the Treasury

Moderate

Vector: 59%

Pages: 736-738AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"Both the bill and the Project 2025 Treasury/CFIUS section aim to counter PRC influence, but the bill focuses on diplomatic and development assistance while the policy focuses on investment screening and CFIUS reforms, resulting in only thematic overlap rather than direct implementation."

Key themes:countering PRC influenceeconomic statecraftsupply chain diversificationnational securityforeign policy

— 703 — Department of the Treasury l The U.S. should also examine increasing or decreasing its ownership levels in these institutions in order to achieve maximum leverage. CHINA AND OTHER GEOPOLITICAL THREATS Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States. The interagency Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States should realign its priorities to meet the United States’ current foreign policy threats, especially from China. On October 20, 2022, the Treasury Department, which chairs CFIUS, adopted the first-ever CFIUS Enforcement and Penalty Guidelines50 on the committee’s national security risk mitigation requirements. However, there are no clear rules that guide CFIUS on mitigation monitoring, nor is there a published penalty sched- ule to standardize accountability when CFIUS pursues a civil money penalty for violators. In addition, Treasury—as chair of the committee—runs an opaque pro- cess that biases committee procedure toward corporate interests and away from national security interests. Finally, the committee’s jurisdiction does not extend over greenfield investments that Chinese state-owned enterprises have historically pursued in the United States, which leaves America vulnerable to an instrument of Chinese economic statecraft. Given these issues, the next steps for CFIUS should be to develop a more coherent—and transparent—mitigation monitoring program to complement the enforcement guidelines, give CFIUS agencies in charge of national security con- cerns an equal voice at the table, and petition Congress to amend the law to cover Chinese greenfield investments. CFIUS should publish a penalty schedule for violations of CFIUS reporting and mitigation requirements. Publishing a penalty schedule for CFIUS violations will reduce the discretion of the committee to waive penalties or impose mere “wrist slap” costs on violators of the law. Additionally, a standardized penalty schedule would likely increase the deterrence of CFIUS enforcement by reducing the per- ception among parties to covered transactions that they can avoid enforcement by the committee or secure special exceptions based on appeals to the commit- tee’s discretion. As a legal matter—and in application by CFIUS—mitigation monitoring has developed as the Wild West. There are no clear rules that guide the entire com- mittee on mitigation monitoring, nor is there the same level of oversight or accountability within and among the agencies as applies when CFIUS reviews a transaction or when it pursues a civil money penalty. Indeed, it is a credit to transaction parties and the professionalism of the governmental officials and con- tractors who conduct mitigation monitoring on behalf of the government that, by and large, mitigation monitoring has worked adequately during the last several decades. But dependency on the personality and capabilities of individuals creates unnecessary risk both for CFIUS and for transaction parties.

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Sen. Van Hollen, Chris

A bill to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3570 Olney Laytonsville Road in Olney, Maryland, as the "Edward L. Ramsey Olney Post Office Building".

119/s/3270

Justice Thurgood Marshall National Historic Site Establishment Act of 2025

119/s/791

Francis G. Newlands Memorial Removal Act

119/s/2369

Back to All Bills