Recognizing a century of broadcasting excellence from WOWO and celebrating the radio station's 100th anniversary.

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/hres/252

Last Updated: May 22, 2025

Recognizing a century of broadcasting excellence from WOWO and celebrating the radio station's 100th anniversary.

HRES. 252, 119th Congress — read as touching Print & Broadcast Media.

The sponsor

Rep. Stutzman, Marlin A. [R-IN-3]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$6,250 raised

4 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

55% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Health and Human Services" section, p. 530-532 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H1344)

March 30, 2025

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed House

🏛️

Senate Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

**Analysis of HRES 252: A Symbolic Resolution with No Real Teeth**

As a visionary entrepreneur and thought leader, I'll cut through the noise and provide an unvarnished assessment of this congressional bill.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This resolution is a feel-good exercise in nostalgia, celebrating WOWO's 100th anniversary as a radio station. It's a symbolic gesture with no tangible impact on policy or governance.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** There are none. This resolution doesn't propose any changes to existing law or regulations. It's simply a ceremonial acknowledgment of WOWO's milestone.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The only parties affected by this resolution are the owners and employees of WOWO, who will likely receive a congratulatory pat on the back from Congress. The broader public won't be impacted in any meaningful way.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** From my perspective as a forward-thinking entrepreneur, this resolution is a distraction from more pressing issues that require legislative attention. It's a waste of time and resources that could be better spent on deregulation efforts or initiatives that foster innovation.

In reality, the true impact of this resolution will be negligible. WOWO's influence and reach are already established, and this symbolic gesture won't alter their business model or revenue streams in any significant way.

As I always say, "The government should focus on creating an environment conducive to innovation, not indulging in sentimental gestures." This resolution is a perfect example of the inefficiencies inherent in democratic processes. If we truly want to drive progress and growth, we need to prioritize deregulation, privatization, and the empowerment of visionary leaders like myself.

**Projection:** I estimate that this resolution will have a net impact of $0 on the US economy and my personal wealth. It's a non-event, a mere blip on the radar of meaningful policy discussions.

In conclusion, HRES 252 is a pointless exercise in nostalgia that fails to address the real challenges facing our nation. As a thought leader, I'll continue to advocate for policies that promote innovation, deregulation, and the advancement of my own interests.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a resolution is not the same as a law, but rather an expression of opinion or sentiment by Congress.

**Main Purpose & Objectives** This House Resolution (HRES 252) aims to recognize and celebrate the 100th anniversary of WOWO, a radio station based in Fort Wayne, Indiana. The resolution's primary objective is to acknowledge WOWO's contributions to broadcasting excellence and its impact on the community.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** There are no changes to existing law proposed in this resolution. It's simply a feel-good gesture, expressing admiration for WOWO's history and influence. Remember when we learned about the different types of bills in Congress? This one falls under the category of a "simple resolution," which doesn't have the force of law.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** The affected parties are primarily WOWO, its employees, and listeners. The stakeholders include the local community, conservative talk radio enthusiasts, and anyone interested in broadcasting history.

**Potential Impact & Implications** This resolution has no tangible impact on policy or existing laws. It's a symbolic gesture, which might boost morale for WOWO staff and fans but won't affect the broader public. As we discussed in class, resolutions like this one can be used to express opinions or sentiments without taking concrete action.

Now, I know some of you might be thinking, "Why is Congress wasting time on this?" Well, as I explained back in 8th grade, Congress has the power to express its opinions and sentiments through resolutions. It's a way for lawmakers to acknowledge important events, people, or institutions without enacting new laws.

Moving forward, it's essential to understand that this resolution will likely pass with little fanfare, given its non-controversial nature. However, if you recall our discussions on the legislative process, you'll remember that even simple resolutions like this one must still go through the proper channels, including committee review and a vote by the full House.

Next thing you know, I'll have to explain how a bill becomes a law... again.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

Folks, gather 'round the table and listen up! I've got my eyes on HRES 252, a bill that's supposed to be just a harmless tribute to a radio station's 100th anniversary. But don't be fooled – there's more to it than meets the eye.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** On the surface, this resolution is all about recognizing WOWO's broadcasting excellence and celebrating its centennial anniversary. But I'm telling you, it's just a smokescreen. The real purpose is to promote conservative values and ideologies through the guise of honoring a beloved radio station. It's a clever way for our government to subtly shape public opinion and push their agenda.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** This bill doesn't explicitly change any existing laws, but it does set a precedent for future resolutions that might not be so innocuous. By recognizing WOWO's "exemplary broadcasting" and its role in shaping conservative principles, the government is essentially endorsing a specific ideology. This could lead to more bills and resolutions that promote partisan interests under the guise of celebrating milestones or honoring institutions.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The obvious stakeholders are WOWO, its listeners, and the conservative community at large. But I'd argue that this bill also affects the broader public, as it contributes to the normalization of conservative ideologies in mainstream media. It's a subtle yet insidious way for our government to influence public discourse.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This resolution might seem harmless, but its implications are far-reaching. By promoting conservative values and ideologies through WOWO, the government is essentially creating a platform for partisan propaganda. This could lead to further polarization of our society, as more media outlets feel pressure to conform to specific ideological standards.

Now, I know what you're thinking – "Uncle, you're just being paranoid again." But let me tell you, folks, this bill is just the tip of the iceberg. It's a small part of a larger game, where our government uses seemingly innocuous resolutions to shape public opinion and advance their agendas.

So, the next time you tune into WOWO or any other conservative talk radio station, remember: there's more to it than just entertainment and news. There's an agenda at play, and it's up to us to stay vigilant and question everything.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Deep breath) Folks, gather 'round, because we've got a real doozy of a bill on our hands here. HRES 252 is a resolution that's so brazenly patriotic, it'll make your heart swell with pride... or maybe just roll your eyes in exasperation. Either way, I'm here to break it down for you.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This bill is all about celebrating the 100th anniversary of WOWO, a radio station from Indiana that's been "spreading conservative values" (wink, wink) since 1925. The resolution aims to recognize WOWO's "exemplary broadcasting record," which has allegedly strengthened communities and educated families on the most pressing issues.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** Well, here's the thing – there aren't any actual provisions or changes to existing law in this bill. It's purely a symbolic gesture, a feel-good resolution that doesn't actually do anything concrete. But hey, who needs substance when you can have pomp and circumstance?

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The main beneficiary of this bill is WOWO itself, which gets to bask in the glory of congressional recognition. I'm sure their ratings will skyrocket (not). The real stakeholders here are the conservative elites who want to pat themselves on the back for promoting "freedom" and "American values." You know, the usual suspects.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Let's be real – this bill is a non-event. It won't change anything in the grand scheme of things. But what it does do is provide a convenient opportunity for conservative lawmakers to posture about their commitment to freedom and traditional values. And hey, who knows? Maybe WOWO will get a nice PR boost out of this.

(Smirk) Now, I know what you're thinking – "Is this really the best use of congressional time?" But let's not be too cynical here. After all, as the great philosopher once said, "A resolution is just a resolution." (Wink)

In conclusion, HRES 252 is a masterclass in performative patriotism, a bill that says nothing but means everything to those who want to signal their allegiance to conservative values. So go ahead, folks – take a moment to appreciate the sheer audacity of this resolution. It's a wild ride.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

(sigh) Oh joy, another meaningless resolution from our esteemed Congress. Let's dissect this farce.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This bill is a feel-good exercise in self-congratulation, celebrating the 100th anniversary of WOWO, a radio station that has managed to stay on the air for an impressive century. The "objectives" are laughable: recognizing broadcasting excellence (whatever that means), celebrating a milestone birthday, and... wait for it... supporting the station's efforts to continue existing.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** There aren't any. This is a resolution, not a bill with actual legislative teeth. It's a symbolic gesture, a pat on the back for WOWO from our benevolent Congress. No laws will be changed, no regulations will be altered, and no one will actually benefit from this exercise in futility.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The only parties affected are the egos of the sponsors (Stutzman and Yakym) and the owners of WOWO, who get to bask in the glory of Congressional recognition. Oh, and maybe a few listeners who might feel good about their favorite radio station getting a shout-out from Washington.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Zero. Zilch. Nada. This resolution will have no discernible impact on anyone's life, except perhaps for the poor staffer who had to write this drivel. It won't create jobs, improve infrastructure, or address any pressing national issues. Its sole purpose is to waste time and taxpayer dollars on a pointless exercise in self-aggrandizement.

Diagnosis: This bill suffers from Acute Congressional Narcissism (ACN), a condition where lawmakers prioritize their own self-interest over actual governance. Symptoms include excessive use of empty rhetoric, pointless resolutions, and a complete disregard for the well-being of constituents.

Treatment: A healthy dose of skepticism, a strong critical thinking regimen, and a reminder that Congress is supposed to serve the people, not just stroke its own ego. But let's be real, this disease is terminal.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

Let's break down this congressional bill, HRES 252, and get the lowdown on what it's all about.

**Main Purpose & Objectives** This resolution is like a big ol' birthday cake for WOWO, a radio station in Indiana that's been killin' it for 100 years. The main purpose is to recognize WOWO's century of broadcasting excellence and celebrate its anniversary. It's like a shoutout from Congress, sayin', "Hey, WOWO, you're doin' great things!"

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** There aren't any major changes to existing law here, bro. This is more like a feel-good resolution that acknowledges WOWO's contributions to the community and its impact on American broadcasting. It's all about celebratin' the station's history, from its early days as one of the first radio stations in the US to its current status as a conservative talk radio powerhouse.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** The main stakeholders here are WOWO itself, its listeners, and the community it serves. This resolution is like a big hug for everyone involved with the station, including local commentators, national syndicated figures, and even the families who've been tuning in for generations.

**Potential Impact & Implications** Now, you might be thinkin', "What's the big deal about a radio station?" But here's the thing: WOWO has played a significant role in shapin' conservative values and principles in its community. This resolution acknowledges that impact and shows appreciation for the station's efforts to inform and inspire its listeners.

In terms of potential implications, this resolution might not have any direct policy changes, but it could set a precedent for future recognition of other media outlets or organizations that make significant contributions to their communities.

So there you have it, bro – HRES 252 is all about celebratin' WOWO's 100th anniversary and recognizing its impact on American broadcasting. It's like a chill beach party with Congress as the host, sayin', "Hey, let's give it up for WOWO!"

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**Bill Analysis: HRES 252**

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** HRES 252 is a resolution recognizing the 100th anniversary of WOWO, a conservative talk radio station based in Fort Wayne, Indiana. The bill's primary objective is to celebrate WOWO's broadcasting excellence and its contributions to the community.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The resolution has no legislative impact and does not change existing law. It is a ceremonial gesture, acknowledging WOWO's history and influence as a conservative talk radio station.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The primary stakeholders are:

1. WOWO Radio Station: The bill's subject and beneficiary. 2. Conservative Talk Radio Industry: As a prominent conservative talk radio station, WOWO's recognition may boost the industry's profile and credibility. 3. Local Community: The resolution acknowledges WOWO's role in shaping the community's values and principles.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** While the bill has no legislative impact, it may have symbolic implications:

1. **Conservative Media Endorsement**: By recognizing WOWO's contributions, the House of Representatives is implicitly endorsing conservative talk radio as a valuable part of American media. 2. **Local Politics**: The resolution may be seen as a nod to Indiana's conservative voters and politicians, potentially influencing local politics and elections. 3. **Media Landscape**: The recognition of WOWO's 100th anniversary may highlight the importance of traditional media outlets in shaping public opinion and discourse.

**Monied Interest Analysis:** While there are no direct financial interests at play in this resolution, it is worth noting that:

1. **National Association of Broadcasters (NAB)**: As a trade association representing radio and television broadcasters, NAB may have an indirect interest in promoting the reputation of its member stations, including WOWO. 2. **Conservative PACs**: Organizations like the National Conservative Political Action Committee (NCPAC) or the Club for Growth may view this resolution as a way to promote conservative values and media outlets.

**Committee Capture:** The bill was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, which has a history of being influenced by special interest groups. However, in this case, there is no apparent committee capture or conflict of interest.

In conclusion, HRES 252 is a ceremonial resolution recognizing WOWO's 100th anniversary, with no legislative impact. While it may have symbolic implications for conservative media and local politics, its primary purpose is to acknowledge the station's contributions to the community.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Stutzman, Marlin A. [R-IN-3]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$6,250

4 donors

PACs

Organizations

Committees

Individuals

$6,250

No PAC contributions found

No organization contributions found

No committee contributions found

BLEIBERG, PAUL E

1 transaction

$3,000

TORREY, MICHAEL K

1 transaction

$2,000

BECK, DANIELLE

1 transaction

$1,000

REY, MARK

1 transaction

$250

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 1 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Yakym, Rudy [R-IN-2]

ID: Y000067

Top Contributors

POKAGON BAND OF POTAWATOMI INDIANS

OrganizationDOWAGIAC, MI

$8,300

Apr 25, 2023

MATCH-E-BE-NASH-SHE-WISH BAND OF POTTAWATOMI INDIANS

OrganizationSHELBYVILLE, MI

$3,300

Oct 22, 2024

MASHANTUCKET PEQUOT TRIBAL NATION

OrganizationMASHANTUCKET, CT

$3,300

Oct 27, 2023

EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS

OrganizationCHEROKEE, NC

$3,300

Mar 16, 2024

POKAGON BAND OF POTAWATOMI INDIANS

OrganizationDOWAGIAC, MI

$3,300

Apr 25, 2023

MATCH-E-BE-NASH-SHE-WISH BAND OF POTTAWATOMI INDIANS

OrganizationSHELBYVILLE, MI

$3,300

Sep 29, 2023

PECHANGA BAND OF INDIANS

OrganizationTEMECULA, CA

$3,300

Sep 29, 2023

SAGINAW CHIPPEWA TRIBE OF MICHIGAN

OrganizationMT. PLEASANT, MI

$2,000

Oct 27, 2023

POKAGON BAND OF POTAWATOMI INDIANS

OrganizationDOWAGIAC, MI

$1,700

Apr 27, 2023

CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA

OrganizationDURANT, OK

$1,650

Dec 31, 2023

Donor Network - Rep. Stutzman, Marlin A. [R-IN-3]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 15 nodes and 7 connections (8 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $21,150

Top Donors - Rep. Stutzman, Marlin A. [R-IN-3]

Showing top 4 donors by contribution amount

4 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 1 helped.

+Print & Broadcast Mediaconfidence 0.95
Resolution celebrates WOWO's 100th anniversary, recognizes its exemplary broadcasting, and supports its efforts to continue informing and inspiring generations. This is a clear benefit to the broadcast radio industry.

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Health and Human Services

Weak

Vector: 53%

Pages: 530-532AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HRES 252 is a ceremonial resolution celebrating a radio station's anniversary and its role in promoting conservative values, while the Project 2025 policy calls for a specific HHS action to withdraw abortion-related HIPAA guidance. The two share only a broad conservative orientation but lack substantive policy overlap."

Key themes:conservative valuesmedia influencesymbolic recognition

— 497 — Department of Health and Human Services l OCR should withdraw its Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)86 guidance on abortion. OCR should withdraw its June 2022 guidance87 that purports to address patient privacy concerns following the Dobbs decision but is actually a politicized statement in favor of abortion and against Dobbs. HIPAA covers patients in the womb, but this guidance treats them as nonpersons contrary to law. The guidance is unnecessary and contributes to ideologically motivated fearmongering about abortion after Dobbs. AUTHOR’S NOTE: The preparation of this chapter was a collective enterprise of selfless individuals involved in the 2025 Presidential Transition Project. All contributors to this chapter are listed at the front of this volume and include former officials in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and other agencies, as well as academics, attorneys, and experts in the health care and insurance fields. — 498 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise ENDNOTES 1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Strategic Plan, FY 2018–2022, p. 50, https://aspe.hhs.gov/ sites/default/files/documents/feac346aca967bfadc446398679e14ec/hhs-strategic-plan-fy-2018-2022.pdf (accessed February 7, 2023). 2. “Strategic Goal 1: Protect and Strengthen Equitable Access to High Quality and Affordable Healthcare” in ibid. “In the context of HHS, this Strategic Plan adopts the definition of underserved communities listed in Executive Order 13985: Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities through the Federal Government to refer to ‘populations sharing a particular characteristic, as well as geographic communities, who have been systematically denied a full opportunity to participate in aspects of economic, social, and civic life’; this definition includes individuals who belong to underserved communities that have been denied such treatment, such as Black, Latino, and Indigenous and Native American persons, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders and other persons of color; members of religious minorities; lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) persons; persons with disabilities; persons who live in rural areas; and persons otherwise adversely affected by persistent poverty or inequality. Individuals may belong to more than one underserved community and face intersecting barriers. This definition applies to the terms underserved communities and underserved populations throughout this Strategic Plan.” Ibid. Emphasis in original. 3. Karen Weintraub, “Americans’ Life Expectancy Continues to Fall, Erasing Health Gains of the Last Quarter Century,” USA Today, December 22, 2022, https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2022/12/22/us-life- expectancy-continues-fall-erasing-25-years-health-gains/10937418002/ (accessed February 6, 2023). 4. Apoorva Mandavilli, “The C.D.C. Isn’t Publishing Large Portions of the Data It Collects,” The New York Times, updated February 22, 2022, https://www.congress.gov/117/meeting/house/114450/documents/HHRG-117- IF02-20220302-SD004.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023). 5. Zachary B. Sluzala and Edmund F. Haislmaier, “Lessons from COVID-19: How Policymakers Should Reform the Regulation of Clinical Testing,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 3696, March 28, 2022, https://www. heritage.org/public-health/report/lessons-covid-19-how-policymakers-should-reform-the-regulation-clinical. 6. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (C),” https://www.cdc.gov/maso/pdf/cdcmiss.pdf (March 16, 2023). 7. Judith Garber, “CDC ‘Disclaimers’ Hide Financial Conflicts of Interest,” Lown Institute Accountability Blog, November 6, 2019, https://lowninstitute.org/cdc-disclaimers-hide-financial-conflicts-of-interest/ (accessed February 6, 2023). See also U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “CDC Foundation Active Programs (October 1, 2014–September 30, 2015),” https://www. cdcfoundation.org/sites/default/files/upload/pdf/CDCFoundation-ActivePrograms-FY2015.pdf (accessed February 7, 2023); “CDC Active Programs (October 1, 2015–September 30, 2016),” https://www.cdcfoundation. org/sites/default/files/upload/pdf/CDCFoundation-ActivePrograms-FY2016.pdf (accessed February 7, 2023); “CDC Foundation Active Programs (October 1, 2016–September 30, 2017),” https://www.cdcfoundation.org/ sites/default/files/upload/pdf/CDCFoundation-ActivePrograms-FY2017.pdf (accessed February 7, 2023); “CDC Foundation Active Programs (October 1, 2017–September 30, 2018),” https://www.cdcfoundation.org/sites/default/ files/upload/pdf/CDCFoundation-ActivePrograms-FY2018.pdf (accessed February 7, 2023); “CDC Foundation Active Programs, October 1, 2018–September 30, 2019,” https://www.cdcfoundation.org/sites/default/files/upload/ pdf/CDCFoundation-ActivePrograms-FY2019.pdf (accessed February 7, 2023); “CDC Foundation Active Programs, October 1, 2029–September 30, 2020,” https://www.cdcfoundation.org/CDCF-ActivePrograms-CDC-FY20?inline (accessed February 7, 2023); and “CDC Foundation Active Programs, October 1, 2020–September 30, 2021,” https://www.cdcfoundation.org/CDCF-ActivePrograms-CDC-FY21?inline (accessed February 7, 2023). 8. Joel White and Doug Badger, “In Order to Defeat COVID-19, the Federal Government Must Modernize Its Public Health Data,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 3527, September 3, 2020, https://www.heritage. org/sites/default/files/2020-09/BG3527_0.pdf. 9. S. 15, Ensuring Accurate and Complete Abortion Data Reporting Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 23, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/s15/BILLS-118s15is.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023), and H.R. 632, Ensuring Accurate and Complete Abortion Data Reporting Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 30, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr632/BILLS-118hr632ih.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023). 10. Doug Badger, “How Congress Can Make Real Progress on Drug Prices,” Heritage Foundation Issue Brief No. 5016, December 9, 2019, https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/files/2019-12/IB5016_1.pdf.

Department of Health and Human Services

Minimal

Vector: 55%

Pages: 518-520AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HRES 252 is a ceremonial resolution celebrating a radio station's anniversary and does not address any health care, medical training, childcare, or related policies outlined in the Project 2025 HHS section."

Key themes:conservative valuessymbolic recognition

— 486 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 1. Investigate state medical school compliance with the Coats–Snowe Amendment,71 which prohibits discrimination against health care entities that do not provide or undergo training for abortion. 2. Ensure that the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) complies with all relevant conscience statutes and regulations and that states have taken the affirmative steps (for example, by issuing regulations) to assure compliance with Coats–Snowe. 3. Communicate to medical schools that any abortion-related training must be on an opt-in rather than opt-out basis. 4. Require states that receive HHS funds to issue regulations or enter into arrangements with accrediting bodies to comply with the Coats–Snowe Amendment’s prohibition of mandatory abortion training by individuals or institutions. The Coats–Snowe Amendment specifically requires such state regulations or arrangements. l Prioritize funding for home-based childcare, not universal day care. As HRSA’s Early Childhood Health page outlines, “Currently, only about half of U.S. preschoolers are on-track with their development and ready for school. And more than one in four of children (28%) who experience abuse or neglect are under 3 years old.”72 Concurrently, children who spend significant time in day care experience higher rates of anxiety, depression, and neglect as well as poor educational and developmental outcomes. Instead of providing universal day care, funding should go to parents either to offset the cost of staying home with a child or to pay for familial, in-home childcare. l Provide education and resources on early childhood health. By partnering with new organizations like the Center on Child and Family Poverty, HRSA should provide resources and information on the importance of the mother–child relationship in child well-being. This should include relationship education curricula that equip mothers and caregivers to connect with and improve their understanding of their infants, toddlers, and young children. Maternal and Child Health. Currently, the HRSA Maternal and Child Health program is collecting data on the benefits of doulas in improving the health, safety, and emotional well-being of mothers at birth. Doulas provide a patient-focused, nonmedical support system for single or married mothers that “decreases the — 487 — Department of Health and Human Services overall cesarean rate by 50%, the length of labor by 25%, the use of oxytocin by 40%, and requests for an epidural by 60%. Doulas often use the power of touch and massage to reduce stress and anxiety during labor.”73 Given concerns about maternal mortality or postpartum depression that is worsened by poor birth experiences, doulas should be an active option for all women whether they are giving birth in a traditional hospital, through midwifery, or at home. Additionally, since most Doulas’ services are not covered by traditional insurance programs, the Maternal and Child Health program should work to pro- vide funding for low-income mothers. INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE (IHS) The Indian Health Service serves our American Indian and Alaska Native popu- lations. Reforms are needed to improve America’s ability to deliver on its promises to these important populations and must take account of cultural preferences and lifestyles, limitations due to geography (such as challenging terrain), and limited Internet access. For example, contacting individuals within some of these com- munities and tribes during the COVID-19 pandemic proved to be difficult because many had transient addresses and unreliable cell service. During the transition to the Biden Administration, IHS abandoned tribes as their sources of COVID-19 tests and vaccine supplies disappeared. It is important to guard against such situations in order to preserve these tribes’ access to health resources during public health emergencies (PHEs). Even before the pandemic, services available to these populations through federal resources and personnel (such as vision care) were often scarce or nonexistent. Patients in these populations should be empowered to rely on alternatives to IHS through better access to private health care providers. Exploring positive reforms contained in the VA MISSION Act74 could reveal similar opportunities for increased options and access for American Indians and Alaska Natives. RURAL HEALTH A growing concern is the decreasing access to health care services for Americans living in rural, less populated areas. Many find themselves in regions that were not previously as rural as industries move away, taking with them economic prosperity and often medical providers. Others are in essential professions such as farming that by nature necessitate living in regions with fewer city accommodations and economic opportunities. Seeking space for one’s family and cultivating the land are valued goals that are deeply rooted in America’s fabric. Both Congress and an Administration must continually keep in mind how health care policies uniquely affect these regions because their market trends and populations are different from those of more populous regions. Often, rural patients face an hour’s drive to the nearest medical provider or facility or have

Department of Veterans Affairs

Minimal

Vector: 53%

Pages: 679-681AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HRES 252 is a ceremonial resolution honoring a radio station's anniversary and has no substantive connection to veterans' health care policy, VA infrastructure, or any of the specific Department of Veterans Affairs reforms outlined in Project 2025."

— 646 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 3. Section 121 (developing and administering an education program that teaches veterans about their health care options available from the Department of Veterans Affairs). 4. Section 152 (returning the Office for Innovation of Care and Payment to the Office of Enterprise Integration with a joint governance process set up with the VHA). 5. Section 161 (overhauling Family Caregiver Program expansion, which has gone poorly, so that it focuses on consistency of eligibility and awareness that the most severely wounded or injured may require the program indefinitely). l Require the VHA to report publicly on all aspects of its operation, including quality, safety, patient experience, timeliness, and cost-effectiveness, using standards similar to those in the Medicare Accountable Care Organization program so that the government may monitor and achieve continuous improvement in the VA system more effectively. l Encourage VA Medical Centers to seek out relevant academic and private- sector input in their communities to improve the overall patient experience. Budget l Conduct an independent audit of the VA similar to the 2018 Department of Defense (DOD) audit to identify IT, management, financial, contracting, and other deficiencies. l Assess the misalignment of VHA facilities and rising infrastructure costs. The VHA operates 172 inpatient medical facilities nationally that are an average of 60 years old. Some of these facilities are underutilized and inadequately staffed. Facilities in certain urban and rural areas are seeing significant declines in the veteran population and strong competition for fresh medical staff. In 2018, Congress authorized an Asset Infrastructure Review (AIR) of national VHA medical markets to provide insight into where the VA health care budget should be responsibly allocated to serve veterans most effectively. However, the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee lacked the political will to act on the White House’s nominations of commission members, and this ultimately led to termination of the AIR process. The next Administration should seek out agile, creative, and politically acceptable operational solutions to this aging infrastructure status quo, — 647 — Department of Veterans Affairs reimagine the health care footprint in some locales, and spur a realignment of capacity through budgetary allocations. Specifically: 1. Embrace the expansion of Community Based Outpatient Clinics (CBOCs) as an avenue to maintain a VA footprint in challenging medical markets without investing further in obsolete and unaffordable VA health care campuses. 2. Explore the potential to pilot facility-sharing partnerships between the VA and strained local health care systems to reduce costs by leveraging limited talent and resources. Personnel l Extend the term of the Under Secretary for Health (USH) to five years. Additionally, authority should be given to reappoint this individual for a second five-year term both to allow for continuity and to protect the USH from political transition. l Establish a Senior Executive Service (SES) position of VHA Care System Chief Information Officer (CIO), selected by and reporting to the chief of the VHA Care System with a dotted line to the VA CIO. l Identify a workflow process to bring wait times in compliance with VA MISSION Act–required time frames wherever possible. 1. Assess the daily clinical appointment load for physicians and clinical staff in medical facilities where wait times for care are well outside of the time frames required by the VA MISSION Act. 2. Require VHA facilities to increase the number of patients seen each day to equal the number seen by DOD medical facilities: approximately 19 patients per provider per day. Currently, VA facilities may be seeing as few as six patients per provider per day. 3. Consider a pilot program to extend weekday appointment hours and offer Saturday appointment options to veterans if a facility continues to demonstrate that it has excess capacity and is experiencing delays in the delivery of care for veterans. 4. Identify clinical services that are consistently in high demand but require cost-prohibitive compensation to recruit and retain talent, and examine exceptions for higher competitive pay.

Environmental Protection Agency

Minimal

Vector: 53%

Pages: 461-463AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill is a ceremonial resolution celebrating a radio station's anniversary and does not address EPA water regulations, WOTUS, CWA, or any environmental policy topics outlined in Project 2025."

— 429 — Environmental Protection Agency As a matter of broad practice, OW should be complying with statutorily estab- lished deadlines in all situations with only minimal exceptions. In cases where statutory deadlines will not be met, senior management should be made aware of the delay and should have an opportunity to determine whether alternative courses should be taken. Depending on the outcome of regulations from the Biden Administration as well as intervention by the Supreme Court on both waters of the United States (WOTUS) and CWA Section 401,29 the repeal and reissuance of new regulations should be pursued. New Policies New regulations should include the following: l A WOTUS rule that makes clear what is and is not a “navigable water” and respects private property rights. Coordinate with Congress to develop legislation, if necessary, to codify the definition in Rapanos v. United States that “waters of the United States” can refer only to “relatively permanent, standing or continuously flowing bodies of water…as opposed to ordinarily dry channels through which water occasionally or intermittently flows.”30 l A rule that provides clarity and regulatory certainty regarding the CWA Section 401 water quality certification process to limit unnecessary delay for needed projects, including by establishing a discharge-only approach with a limited scope (from point sources into navigable waters), assessing only water quality factors that are consistent with specific CWA sections, and excluding speculative analysis regarding future potential harm. l A rule to ensure that CWA Section 30831 has a clear and enforced time limit. l A rule to clarify the standard for criminal negligence under CWA Sections 40232 and 404.33 l A rule to prohibit retroactive or preemptive permits under CWA Section 404. l A rule to promote and shape nutrient trading that utilizes a carrot-versus- stick approach when dealing with nutrient compliance. l A rule to update compensatory mitigation that imposes no new or additional requirements beyond current law. l A rule on updates necessary for the effective use of the CWA needs survey. — 430 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l An executive order requiring EPA to find avenues and expedite the process for states obtaining primacy in available CWA and SDWA programs. This order would require coordination with the Army Corps of Engineers and the Department of the Interior. l Implementation of additional policies to address challenges in water workforce, issues surrounding timely actions on primacy applications, and cybersecurity. Budget While the overall goal is certainly to reduce government spending, there is one very targeted area where increased spending would be in the nation’s interest. The Clean Water Act needs survey is the entire basis for how congressionally appro- priated funds directed to state revolving funds—standard annual appropriations that are the true underpinning of all infrastructure funding for drinking water and clean water—are distributed by EPA across the country. Because this program is currently underfunded, money is being thrown at untargeted locations while water infrastructure is crumbling at other locations. Increased targeted funding would greatly benefit water systems across the country at a time when intervention is crucial, leaving fewer communities with significant water service challenges. Personnel OW would benefit greatly from the reshifting of SES employees to different programs and from headquarters out to regional offices. OFFICE OF LAND AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT (OLEM) OLEM’s mission is to partner with other federal agencies, states, tribes, local governments, and communities to clean up legacy pollution and revitalize land for reuse. OLEM executes this mission by protecting human health and the envi- ronment while leveraging economic opportunities and creating jobs. OLEM also oversees the agency’s emergency response. The main statutes that OLEM exe- cutes are the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)34 to regulate waste management; the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA)35 to clean up Superfund sites and provide resources for cleaning up brownfields sites; and Section 112(r) of the Clean Air Act36 to reduce the likelihood of accidental chemical releases. Needed Reforms OLEM’s main function is to oversee the execution of cleanups under CERCLA and RCRA; therefore, it is critical that OLEM staff focus on project management more than policy creation. Emphasizing productivity more than process and policies

Environmental Protection Agency

Minimal

Vector: 53%

Pages: 461-463AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HRES 252 is a ceremonial resolution celebrating a radio station's anniversary and contains no provisions related to EPA restructuring, air or water quality regulations, or any environmental policy reforms outlined in the Project 2025 EPA section."

— 428 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Personnel, Budget, and Office Restructuring l Place a political appointee in Ann Arbor, Michigan, for the Office of Transportation and Air Quality (OTAQ, regulating mobile sources) and a political appointee in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, for the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS, regulating stationary sources) and give those appointees the requisite titles and authority to oversee the OTAQ and OAQPS staff. l Establish a political Chief of Staff in D.C. to manage the entire air office. l Pull the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) program out of OTAQ; establish its own suboffice in D.C. (with status parallel to OTAQ and OAQPS) that is headed by a political appointee; and establish a Memorandum of Understanding with the Department of Agriculture and the Department of Energy to work together to establish RFS programs. l Require regional air offices to receive approval from OAR before moving forward with enforcement actions in order to ensure that enforcement is meeting the requirements established by regulations and is not going beyond them. OFFICE OF WATER (OW) OW is responsible for ensuring safe drinking water and restoring and main- taining oceans, watersheds, and their aquatic ecosystems to protect human health, support economic and recreational activities, and provide healthy habitats for fish, plants, and wildlife. Its two main statutes include implementing the Clean Water Act (CWA)26 and Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA).27 OW has generated a large number of expansive regulations that infringe on private property rights, most notably with the Waters of the U.S. program. Needed Reforms The overarching theme for reform is guidance on guidance. OW relies heav- ily on guidance documents that are outdated and that sometimes have been in a “deliberative” state for years. Additionally, there are significant issues surrounding OW’s holding up guidance as something more than simply guidance: as something akin to law in certain circumstances. The August 6, 2019, “Office of Water Policy for Draft Documents” memorandum28 should be strictly enforced to ensure transpar- ency as well as good governance by not letting guidance linger in draft form and by also ensuring that guidance documents are clearly just that: guidance. They do not have the effect of law and should not be treated by the office as if they did have any such effect. — 429 — Environmental Protection Agency As a matter of broad practice, OW should be complying with statutorily estab- lished deadlines in all situations with only minimal exceptions. In cases where statutory deadlines will not be met, senior management should be made aware of the delay and should have an opportunity to determine whether alternative courses should be taken. Depending on the outcome of regulations from the Biden Administration as well as intervention by the Supreme Court on both waters of the United States (WOTUS) and CWA Section 401,29 the repeal and reissuance of new regulations should be pursued. New Policies New regulations should include the following: l A WOTUS rule that makes clear what is and is not a “navigable water” and respects private property rights. Coordinate with Congress to develop legislation, if necessary, to codify the definition in Rapanos v. United States that “waters of the United States” can refer only to “relatively permanent, standing or continuously flowing bodies of water…as opposed to ordinarily dry channels through which water occasionally or intermittently flows.”30 l A rule that provides clarity and regulatory certainty regarding the CWA Section 401 water quality certification process to limit unnecessary delay for needed projects, including by establishing a discharge-only approach with a limited scope (from point sources into navigable waters), assessing only water quality factors that are consistent with specific CWA sections, and excluding speculative analysis regarding future potential harm. l A rule to ensure that CWA Section 30831 has a clear and enforced time limit. l A rule to clarify the standard for criminal negligence under CWA Sections 40232 and 404.33 l A rule to prohibit retroactive or preemptive permits under CWA Section 404. l A rule to promote and shape nutrient trading that utilizes a carrot-versus- stick approach when dealing with nutrient compliance. l A rule to update compensatory mitigation that imposes no new or additional requirements beyond current law. l A rule on updates necessary for the effective use of the CWA needs survey.

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Rep. Stutzman, Marlin A.

Fostering the Use of Technology to Uphold Regulatory Effectiveness in Supervision Act

119/hr/8278

Emergency Spending Accountability Act

119/hr/3787

Regulation A+ Improvement Act of 2025

119/hr/6541

Back to All Bills