To temporarily expand the authorized uses of grants awarded under the Veterans Legacy Program of the National Cemetery Administration, and for other purposes.

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/9321
Last Updated: August 12, 2026

Sponsored by

Rep. Nunn, Zachary [R-IA-3]

ID: N000193

Follow the money

The bill

To temporarily expand the authorized uses of grants awarded under the Veterans Legacy Program of the National Cemetery Administration, and for other purposes.

HR. 9321, 119th Congress — read as touching Private Prisons & Immigration Detention.

The sponsor

Rep. Nunn, Zachary [R-IA-3]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$142,100 raised

24 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

85% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Veterans Affairs" section, p. 688-691 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Subcommittee Hearings Held

June 24, 2026

Introduced

Committee Review

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed House

🏛️

Senate Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

**HR 9321: A Temporary Band-Aid on a Festering Wound of Veteran Neglect** *Diagnosis: Chronic underfunding and bureaucratic inertia, temporarily masked by performative compassion.*

**1. Main Purpose & Objectives** The stated goal of HR 9321 is to allow Veterans Legacy Program (VLP) grants—normally reserved for educational and commemorative projects honoring veterans—to be temporarily repurposed to locate, identify, and inter unclaimed or abandoned human remains suspected to be those of veterans. In plain English: the government finally noticed that veterans are turning up in coroner’s offices and potter’s fields, and instead of fixing the systemic failures that let this happen, it’s letting cemeteries use education money to play forensic janitor for two years. The objective isn’t to prevent veterans from dying alone and unclaimed—it’s to mop up the aftermath while pretending we care.

**2. Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** - **Temporary Expansion (Subsection a):** For two years post-enactment, VLP grant recipients may use funds for forensic-adjacent tasks: finding suspected veteran remains, verifying identity via DNA or records, and burying them in national cemeteries. - **Sunset Provision (Subsection b):** This expansion auto-expires at the end of the second fiscal year after enactment—because nothing says “we honor our veterans” like a hard deadline on basic human decency. - **Budgetary Shell Game (Subsection c):** Funds used for this new purpose cannot be *additionally* requested in the President’s budget. Translation: this isn’t new money. It’s robbing Peter (VLP’s educational mission) to pay Paul (burying the forgotten). - **Definition Clarification (Subsection d):** Confirms VLP means what it already meant under PL 116-107—so no real innovation here, just a loophole with an expiration date.

**3. Affected Parties & Stakeholders** - **Veterans’ Families:** Potentially benefit if their missing loved one is ID’d and buried with honors—but only if the remains surface within the next two years and a grant applicant feels like playing detective. - **VLP Grant Recipients (Universities, Nonprofits):** Suddenly tasked with CSI work they weren’t funded or trained for, using money meant for curriculum development and public history projects. - **National Cemetery Administration (NCA):** Gets extra bodies to bury without a corresponding increase in long-term burial infrastructure or staff—because why plan ahead when you can crisis-manage? - **Taxpayers:** Footing the bill for a reactive, temporary fix to a problem that should’ve been solved decades ago via better outreach, discharge tracking, and mental health support. - **Congressional Sponsors (Nunn, Davis):** Get to appear patriotic and compassionate during an election cycle without committing to lasting change—perfect for press releases and grave-side photo ops.

**4. Potential Impact & Implications** This bill is a legislative placebo: it makes us *feel* like we’re addressing the tragedy of unclaimed veterans while doing nothing to stop the hemorrhage. The real disease—veterans slipping through the cracks due to fragmented services, homelessness, untreated PTSD, and poor inter-agency coordination—is ignored. Instead, we’re granting a two-year waiver to use education funds for corpse logistics, admitting that the VLP’s original mission is either insufficiently funded or tragically misaligned with actual veteran needs.

The sunset clause reveals the truth: this isn’t about solving a problem. It’s about creating the *appearance* of action during a political window, then letting the issue fade back into obscurity. If Congress truly cared, it would permanently fund veteran identification services, improve discharge data sharing with the VA and coroners, and expand burial eligibility—not hijack a commemorative grant program to play temporary mortician.

In short: HR 9321 is a cynical, stopgap measure that treats symptoms while ignoring the sepsis. It’s not an honor to veterans—it’s an indictment of a system that lets them die unseen, then scrambles to bury

Related Topics

Military & Veterans AffairsResearch & Innovation PolicyLabor & Employment Policy
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Nunn, Zachary [R-IA-3]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$142,100
21 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$10,100
Committees
$0
Individuals
$132,000

No PAC contributions found

1
SAC & FOX TRIBE OF THE MISSISSIPPI IN IOWA
2 transactions
$3,500
2
OTOE MISSOURIA TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA
1 transaction
$3,300
3
TURTLE MOUNTAIN BAND OF CHIPPEWA OF ND
1 transaction
$3,300

No committee contributions found

1
SMITH, JOHN M.
2 transactions
$13,200
2
SILVERMAN, JEFFREY
2 transactions
$13,200
3
EMMET, RICHARD
1 transaction
$6,600
4
WEEKLEY, RICHARD W.
1 transaction
$6,600
5
STERN, ELIZABETH
1 transaction
$6,600
6
RASMUSSEN, CYNTHIA
1 transaction
$6,600
7
RASMUSSEN, STEPHEN
1 transaction
$6,600
8
BELTRAME, MARC
1 transaction
$6,600
9
BRUCH, TYLER
1 transaction
$6,600
10
DANIELS, RONALD L.
1 transaction
$6,600
11
MYERS, JAMES M.
1 transaction
$6,600
12
SCHWARZMAN, CHRISTINE
1 transaction
$6,600
13
GILLIAM, RICHARD
1 transaction
$6,600
14
SINGER, PAUL
1 transaction
$6,600
15
BRADLEY, JACQUELINE
1 transaction
$6,600
16
RICKETTS, J. JOE
1 transaction
$6,600
17
UNDERWOOD, RUSS
1 transaction
$6,600
18
JONES, NORMAN
1 transaction
$6,600

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 1 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Davis, Donald G. [D-NC-1]

ID: D000230

Top Contributors

26

1
FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA
OrganizationROHNERT PARK, CA
$3,300
Mar 5, 2024
2
TUNICA-BILOXI TRIBE OF LA
OrganizationMARKSVILLE, LA
$2,000
Dec 31, 2023
3
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN
$1,650
Jun 6, 2023
4
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN
$1,650
May 13, 2024
5
BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationLAKESIDE, CA
$1,500
May 31, 2023
6
CHEROKEE NATION
OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK
$1,000
Dec 28, 2023
7
FISHER, DEBORAH
NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED
IndividualCOEUR D ALENE, ID
$4,000
Jul 29, 2024
8
BLOOM, BRADLEY
BERKSHIRE PARTNERS LLC • INVESTMENTS
IndividualWELLESLEY, MA
$3,300
Oct 31, 2024
9
BRAUFMAN, JILL
NOT EMPLOYED • RETIRED
IndividualSURFSIDE, FL
$3,300
Oct 18, 2024
10
CLAPP, STEPHEN
SELF EMPLOYED • RANCHER
IndividualSEQUIM, WA
$3,300
Oct 30, 2024

Donor Network - Rep. Nunn, Zachary [R-IA-3]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 55 nodes and 57 connections

Total contributions: $57

Top Donors - Rep. Nunn, Zachary [R-IA-3]

Showing top 21 donors by contribution amount

3 Orgs18 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 1 harmed.

  • Section 1(a)(3) implies increased federal involvement in interring unclaimed or abandoned remains of veterans in national cemeteries, potentially reducing the need for private prison or detention facilities to handle such remains, although the connection is indirect and the primary focus is on veterans' services.

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Veterans Affairs

Strong
Vector: 64%
Pages: 688-691AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"H.R. 9321 aligns with Project 2025’s focus on improving veteran services by expanding the Veterans Legacy Program to support the identification and dignified interment of unclaimed veteran remains, directly enhancing VA burial honors and outreach—core objectives in veteran care and legacy preservation."

Key themes:veteran burial honorsVA National Cemetery Administrationveteran legacy and memorializationidentification of unclaimed veteranscost-neutral program expansion

— 655 — Department of Veterans Affairs ENDNOTES 1. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Division, VHA Directive 1003, “VHA Veteran Patient Experience,” April 14, 2020, pp. 1 and B-1. 2. S. 2372, VA Mission Act of 2018, Public Law No. 115-182, 115th Congress, June 6, 2018, https://www.congress. gov/115/plaws/publ182/PLAW-115publ182.pdf (accessed January 30, 2023). 3. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VA History Office, “VA History,” last updated May 27, 2021, https://www. va.gov/HISTORY/VA_History/Overview.asp (accessed January 28, 2023). 4. 38 U.S. Code § 1116, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/38/1116 (accessed January 28, 2023). 5. S. 3373, Sergeant First Class Heath Robinson Honoring Our Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics Act of 2022 (Honoring Our PACT Act of 2022), Public Law No. 117-168, 117th Congress, August 10, 2022, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ168/PLAW-117publ168.pdf (accessed January 28, 2023). 6. H.R. 2471, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022, Public Law No. 117-103, 117th Congress, March 15, 2022, Division S, Title I, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ103/PLAW-117publ103.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). Known variously as the Department of Veterans Affairs Nurse and Physician Assistant Retention and Income Security Enhancement Act and the VA Nurse and Physician Assistant RAISE Act. 7. See note 5, supra.

Department of Veterans Affairs

Weak
Vector: 66%
Pages: 679-681AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on burial and identification of unclaimed veteran remains through the Veterans Legacy Program, while Project 2025's VA section emphasizes healthcare reform, infrastructure, personnel management, and accountability—there is minimal thematic overlap between honoring deceased veterans and transforming VA healthcare delivery."

Key themes:veteransDepartment of Veterans Affairsservice delivery

— 646 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 3. Section 121 (developing and administering an education program that teaches veterans about their health care options available from the Department of Veterans Affairs). 4. Section 152 (returning the Office for Innovation of Care and Payment to the Office of Enterprise Integration with a joint governance process set up with the VHA). 5. Section 161 (overhauling Family Caregiver Program expansion, which has gone poorly, so that it focuses on consistency of eligibility and awareness that the most severely wounded or injured may require the program indefinitely). l Require the VHA to report publicly on all aspects of its operation, including quality, safety, patient experience, timeliness, and cost-effectiveness, using standards similar to those in the Medicare Accountable Care Organization program so that the government may monitor and achieve continuous improvement in the VA system more effectively. l Encourage VA Medical Centers to seek out relevant academic and private- sector input in their communities to improve the overall patient experience. Budget l Conduct an independent audit of the VA similar to the 2018 Department of Defense (DOD) audit to identify IT, management, financial, contracting, and other deficiencies. l Assess the misalignment of VHA facilities and rising infrastructure costs. The VHA operates 172 inpatient medical facilities nationally that are an average of 60 years old. Some of these facilities are underutilized and inadequately staffed. Facilities in certain urban and rural areas are seeing significant declines in the veteran population and strong competition for fresh medical staff. In 2018, Congress authorized an Asset Infrastructure Review (AIR) of national VHA medical markets to provide insight into where the VA health care budget should be responsibly allocated to serve veterans most effectively. However, the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee lacked the political will to act on the White House’s nominations of commission members, and this ultimately led to termination of the AIR process. The next Administration should seek out agile, creative, and politically acceptable operational solutions to this aging infrastructure status quo, — 647 — Department of Veterans Affairs reimagine the health care footprint in some locales, and spur a realignment of capacity through budgetary allocations. Specifically: 1. Embrace the expansion of Community Based Outpatient Clinics (CBOCs) as an avenue to maintain a VA footprint in challenging medical markets without investing further in obsolete and unaffordable VA health care campuses. 2. Explore the potential to pilot facility-sharing partnerships between the VA and strained local health care systems to reduce costs by leveraging limited talent and resources. Personnel l Extend the term of the Under Secretary for Health (USH) to five years. Additionally, authority should be given to reappoint this individual for a second five-year term both to allow for continuity and to protect the USH from political transition. l Establish a Senior Executive Service (SES) position of VHA Care System Chief Information Officer (CIO), selected by and reporting to the chief of the VHA Care System with a dotted line to the VA CIO. l Identify a workflow process to bring wait times in compliance with VA MISSION Act–required time frames wherever possible. 1. Assess the daily clinical appointment load for physicians and clinical staff in medical facilities where wait times for care are well outside of the time frames required by the VA MISSION Act. 2. Require VHA facilities to increase the number of patients seen each day to equal the number seen by DOD medical facilities: approximately 19 patients per provider per day. Currently, VA facilities may be seeing as few as six patients per provider per day. 3. Consider a pilot program to extend weekday appointment hours and offer Saturday appointment options to veterans if a facility continues to demonstrate that it has excess capacity and is experiencing delays in the delivery of care for veterans. 4. Identify clinical services that are consistently in high demand but require cost-prohibitive compensation to recruit and retain talent, and examine exceptions for higher competitive pay.

Department of Veterans Affairs

Weak
Vector: 64%
Pages: 676-678AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on burial and identification of unclaimed veteran remains through the Veterans Legacy Program, while the Project 2025 VA section emphasizes healthcare delivery, disability benefits, infrastructure, and workforce challenges—there is minimal thematic overlap beyond both addressing veteran services broadly."

Key themes:veteran servicesDepartment of Veterans Affairs

— 643 — Department of Veterans Affairs with a growth in same-day surgical procedures and outpatient care, so has the VA, and in 2018 Congress added access to private-sector urgent care outlets as one of the VA’s health care benefits. Today, the VA operates 172 inpatient VA Medical Centers (VAMCs), which are an average of 60 years old, and 1,113 Community Based Outpatient Clinics (CBOCs), which are newer facilities designed to meet the needs of veterans closer to home. The VA also manages a Community Care Network (CCN) through contracts with Optum and TriWest, third-party health care administrators responsible for build- ing and maintaining a robust population of community providers to meet the needs of veterans referred for care outside of the VA system. Currently, approximately 6.4 million veterans out of 18 million nationally (and out of the 9.1 million who are enrolled) use the VA for health care; the remainder use employer-sponsored plans, Tricare, Medicare, and Medicaid. The disability benefits system evolved significantly in the years between the Cold War era and the global war on terrorism, a period when the VA enrolled large numbers of veterans from World War II, Korea, and Vietnam who were seeking disability benefits and health care. Disability compensation is the largest VA benefit, but there also are dozens of others, the next largest of which are the GI Bill and the Home Loan Guaranty. These benefits are administered through 56 Regional Benefits Offices (RBOs) and hundreds of satellite sites around the country. The Agent Orange Act of 19914 significantly expanded the scope of disability ben- efits for those who had deployed to Vietnam, and the cost of those benefits began to increase dramatically as the Vietnam generation of veterans aged and began to expe- rience adverse health conditions, some of which were presumed to have been caused by defoliant chemicals used in Southeast Asia. In 2016 and 2017, a burdensome backlog of appeals of denied disability claims from multiple wartime generations—a backlog numbering in the hundreds of thousands—led to a joint effort by the VA, Vet- eran Service Organizations (VSOs), and Congress to pass legislation that streamlined appeal processes. Implemented in 2017, this historic “good governance” success has helped the VA to reduce the number of these appeals dramatically. The Sergeant First Class Heath Robinson Honoring Our Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics (PACT) Act of 20225 addressed adverse health outcomes presumed to be the result of veterans’ exposure to airborne toxins during the global war on terrorism and further expanded disability benefits to the most recent gen- eration of veterans. These ambitious authorities, like the 1991 authorities, have the potential to overwhelm the VA’s ability to process new disability claims and adjudicate appeals. Currently, the VA is seeking to hire large numbers of personnel to process these claims while exploring the use of an automated process to accel- erate claims reviews and decisions. The ever-present lag in the hiring and training of new employees could result in major problems with the timely adjudication of benefits well into the next Administration in 2025. — 644 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise In sum, the VA for the foreseeable future will experience significant fiscal, human capital, and infrastructure crosswinds and risks. Budgets are at historic highs, and with a workforce now above 400,000, the VA is contending with a lack of new veteran enrollees to offset the declining population of older veterans. Recruitment of medical and benefits personnel has become more challenging. Veterans are migrating from the northern states to the southern and western states for retirement and employment. Meanwhile, VA information technol- ogy (IT) is struggling to keep pace with the evolution of patient care and record keeping. Consequently, VA leaders in the next Administration must be wise and courageous political strategists, experienced managers to run day-to-day oper- ations more effectively, innovators to address the changing veteran landscape, and agile “fixers” to mitigate and repair systemic problems created or ignored by the present leadership team. VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION (VHA) Needed Reforms l Rescind all departmental clinical policy directives that are contrary to principles of conservative governance starting with abortion services and gender reassignment surgery. Neither aligns with service-connected conditions that would warrant VA’s providing this type of clinical care, and both follow the Left’s pernicious trend of abusing the role of government to further its own agenda. l Focus on the effects of shifting veteran demographics. At least during the next decade, the VA will experience a significant generational shift in its overall patient population. Of the approximately 18 million veterans alive today, roughly 9.1 million are enrolled for VA health care, and 6.4 million of these enrollees use VA health care consistently. These 6.4 million veterans are split almost evenly between those who are over age 65 and those who are under age 65, but the share of VA’s health care dollars is spent predominantly in the over-65 cohort. That share increases significantly as veterans live longer and use the VHA system at a higher rate. VHA enrollments of new users are increasingly at risk of being exceeded by the deaths of current enrollees, primarily because significant numbers of the Vietnam generation are reaching their life expectancy. The generational transition from Vietnam-era veterans to post-9/11 veterans will take several years to complete. The ongoing demographic transition is a catalyst for needed assessments of how the VA can improve the delivery of care to a numerically declining and differently dispersed national population

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Full Policy Text

Related Bills