To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 111 South Tremont Street in Tremonton, Utah, as the "Sorensen-Estrada Post Office".

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/hr/8225

Last Updated: July 16, 2026

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 111 South Tremont Street in Tremonton, Utah, as the "Sorensen-Estrada Post Office".

HR. 8225, 119th Congress.

The sponsor

Rep. Moore, Blake D. [R-UT-1]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$99,500 raised

24 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

40% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Homeland Security" section, p. 201-204 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

April 28, 2026

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed House

🏛️

Senate Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

The HR 8225 bill, designating the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 111 South Tremont Street in Tremonton, Utah, as the "Sorensen-Estrada Post Office", is a quintessential example of bureaucratic inefficiency. The main purpose and objective of this bill are to rename a post office, a trivial matter that only serves to distract from more pressing issues.

The key provisions and changes to existing law are minimal, with the sole amendment being the designation of the facility as the "Sorensen-Estrada Post Office". This change will have no significant impact on the operations or efficiency of the postal service. The affected parties and stakeholders include the residents of Tremonton, Utah, who may experience a minor sense of pride or satisfaction from having their local post office renamed.

However, as a visionary entrepreneur and thought leader, I must emphasize that this bill is a prime example of how democracy can be an obstacle to progress. The time and resources spent on such trivial matters could be better allocated towards more pressing issues, such as deregulation and tax reform. According to projections from my think tank, the "Liberty Initiative", streamlining bureaucratic processes and reducing regulatory hurdles could unlock billions of dollars in economic growth.

The potential impact and implications of this bill are negligible, with no significant effects on the economy or industry. However, it does highlight the need for a more streamlined and efficient approach to governance. As I've often stated, "the most effective form of governance is one that prioritizes innovation and entrepreneurship over bureaucratic red tape". In an ideal world, such decisions would be made by private entities, unencumbered by the inefficiencies of democratic processes. By privatizing certain aspects of governance, we could unlock unprecedented levels of growth and prosperity.

In conclusion, HR 8225 is a bill that exemplifies the inefficiencies of democracy and highlights the need for a more streamlined approach to governance. As a self-serving billionaire political analyst, I will continue to advocate for policies that prioritize innovation, entrepreneurship, and deregulation, unlocking billions of dollars in economic growth and solidifying my position as a thought leader in the industry.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

Let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics, a bill is a proposed law that must go through a series of steps before it becomes enacted. Remember when we learned about the importance of committees in the legislative process? Well, HR 8225 was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, where it will be reviewed and potentially marked up before being sent to the full House for consideration.

The main purpose of this bill is to designate a specific post office facility in Tremonton, Utah, as the "Sorensen-Estrada Post Office". This is a straightforward example of a commemorative naming bill, which we covered in class as a type of symbolic legislation. The key provision here is Section 1, which states that the facility shall be known and designated by this new name.

As for changes to existing law, this bill doesn't really alter any significant policies or regulations. It's simply a matter of updating references to the post office facility in various documents and records. You should have learned in middle school that bills like these are often used to honor notable individuals or events, and this one is no exception.

The affected parties and stakeholders here are primarily the residents of Tremonton, Utah, who will see their local post office bear a new name. The United States Postal Service will also need to update its records and signage to reflect the change. As we discussed in class, the legislative process involves considering the potential impact on various groups and interests.

In terms of potential impact and implications, this bill is relatively minor. It's not going to have any significant effects on the broader population or the economy. However, it does serve as an example of how the legislative process can be used to recognize and honor individuals or communities. As I always emphasized in class, understanding how a bill becomes a law is crucial for being an informed citizen, and this bill illustrates that process in action.

Now, if you'll recall from our lessons on checks and balances, Congress has the power to make laws, but the President also plays a role in the process. If this bill were to pass both the House and Senate, it would still need to be signed into law by the President or vetoed. We covered this in detail when we learned about the system of government, so I won't belabor the point here. Suffice it to say that this bill will follow the standard path of introduction, committee review, debate, and voting before potentially becoming a law.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

The plot thickens, folks! Let's dive into the seemingly innocuous HR 8225 bill, which appears to be a straightforward designation of a post office in Tremonton, Utah, as the "Sorensen-Estrada Post Office". But, my friends, don't be fooled. There's more to this bill than meets the eye.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**: On the surface, the main purpose of HR 8225 is to rename a post office in honor of Sorensen and Estrada. However, I believe there are ulterior motives at play. By designating this specific post office, the government may be attempting to create a hub for clandestine activities or surveillance operations.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**: The bill itself is brief, but it's what's not said that raises eyebrows. Section 1(a) designates the facility as the "Sorensen-Estrada Post Office", while Section 1(b) updates all references to the facility in existing laws and documents. This could be a clever way to erase any previous connections or records related to the post office, allowing for a fresh start with new, potentially nefarious, activities.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**: The bill mentions Mr. Moore of Utah and his co-sponsors, who may be pawns in a larger game. The real stakeholders could be government agencies, corporations, or other entities seeking to exploit the post office's location for their own gain. The people of Tremonton, Utah, may also be affected, potentially becoming unwitting participants in a larger scheme.

**Potential Impact & Implications**: This bill has far-reaching implications. By establishing a seemingly innocuous post office as a hub for clandestine activities, the government could be creating a node in a larger network of surveillance and control. The "Sorensen-Estrada Post Office" may become a key location for monitoring mail, packages, and communications, potentially infringing on citizens' right to privacy.

In conclusion, HR 8225 is not just a harmless bill designating a post office. It's a potential Trojan horse, hiding in plain sight, with the capacity to undermine our civil liberties and further the interests of those in power. Wake up, sheeple! The truth is out there, and it's hidden in the fine print of bills like HR 8225.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(With a healthy dose of sarcasm and a raised eyebrow) Oh, folks, gather 'round! We've got a real barnburner of a bill on our hands here. HR 8225, the "Sorensen-Estrada Post Office" designation act. (Pausing for dramatic effect) I mean, who wouldn't want to watch their hard-earned tax dollars at work, renaming a post office in... (dramatic pause) Tremonton, Utah? The very epicenter of freedom and democracy! (Winking at the camera)

Now, let's get down to business. The main purpose of this bill is to designate the facility located at 111 South Tremont Street as the "Sorensen-Estrada Post Office". Because, you know, that's exactly what our founding fathers fought for: the right to rename post offices after local heroes. (Rolling his eyes) I mean, who needs healthcare or education when we can have... this? (Smirking)

As for key provisions and changes to existing law, well, it's pretty straightforward. The bill simply states that any reference to the facility shall be deemed a reference to the "Sorensen-Estrada Post Office". Wow, I bet the elites in Washington are just quaking in their boots at the thought of this seismic shift in postal nomenclature. (Chuckles)

The affected parties and stakeholders? Well, it's pretty obvious: the good people of Tremonton, Utah, who will now have the privilege of mailing their letters from the "Sorensen-Estrada Post Office". I'm sure they're just thrilled at the prospect of having their local post office renamed after... (checking notes) ...whoever Sorensen and Estrada are. (Shrugging)

Now, as for potential impact and implications, (leaning in, a conspiratorial whisper) let's be real, folks. This is all about freedom. The freedom to rename post offices, the freedom to honor local heroes, and the freedom to stick it to those pesky elites who think they know better. (Winking) I mean, what's next? Renaming the entire postal system after conservative icons? (Laughing) Oh wait, that's probably already in the works.

In conclusion, HR 8225 is a bold move, folks. A masterstroke of patriotic grandstanding. (Smirking) Who needs substance when you can have... this? ( Gesturing to an imaginary "this") So, let's all take a moment to appreciate the sheer brilliance of our lawmakers, who are clearly fighting for freedom and democracy, one post office at a time. (Sarcastic applause) Bravo, folks! Bravo!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Joy, another thrilling example of congressional genius. HR 8225, the "Sorensen-Estrada Post Office" bill, because what America really needs is a post office named after two people nobody outside of Tremonton, Utah, has ever heard of.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to provide a meaningless gesture of recognition to Sorensen and Estrada, likely local politicians or donors who have contributed to the campaigns of the bill's sponsors. The objective is to pander to the locals, gain some cheap publicity, and maybe even score a few points with the Utah electorate.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill designates a single post office in Tremonton, Utah, as the "Sorensen-Estrada Post Office". Wow, what a monumental change to existing law. I'm sure the framers of the Constitution are rolling over in their graves, thinking, "This is exactly what we had in mind when we created the legislative branch." The bill also includes a provision that any reference to the facility shall be deemed a reference to the newly named post office. Because, you know, this is a matter of national importance.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include the United States Postal Service, which will have to waste resources changing the sign on the post office, and the people of Tremonton, Utah, who will have to endure the embarrassment of having their town associated with such a pointless piece of legislation. Oh, and let's not forget Sorensen and Estrada themselves, who will get to bask in the glory of having a post office named after them.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this bill is zero. Zilch. Nada. It will have no effect on the economy, national security, or any other aspect of American life. But hey, it's a great way for politicians to pretend they're doing something useful while actually just engaging in pointless grandstanding. And who knows, maybe it'll even create a few jobs for sign-makers and postal workers tasked with updating the post office's signage.

In conclusion, HR 8225 is a perfect example of legislative diarrhea – a pointless, meaningless exercise in self-aggrandizement that serves only to highlight the incompetence and cynicism of our elected officials. It's a symptom of a deeper disease: the disease of political narcissism, where politicians care more about their own egos than actually doing what's best for the country. So, let's all take a moment to applaud the sponsors of this bill for their outstanding achievement in wasting taxpayer time and resources. Bravo, gentlemen. Bravo.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

Let's break down this gnarly bill, HR 8225, and see what it's all about.

**Main Purpose & Objectives** This bill is like a chill tribute to some rad individuals, Sorensen and Estrada. It's all about designating a post office in Tremonton, Utah, as the "Sorensen-Estrada Post Office". The main objective is to give this post office a sick new name that honors these two dudes.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill is pretty straightforward, bro. It's got one main section that says the post office at 111 South Tremont Street in Tremonton, Utah, will now be known as the "Sorensen-Estrada Post Office". That's it, dude! There aren't any major changes to existing law or anything too complicated.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** The affected parties are pretty obvious, bro. The United States Postal Service (USPS) is the main one, since they're the ones running the post office. The people of Tremonton, Utah, will also be stoked to have a post office with a new name that honors some local heroes. And, of course, the families and friends of Sorensen and Estrada will be psyched to see their loved ones recognized in this way.

**Potential Impact & Implications** The impact of this bill is pretty low-key, dude. It's not gonna change the world or anything, but it's still a cool way to honor some deserving individuals. The post office will get a new sign, and maybe some other minor changes, but that's about it. However, it's also worth noting that these kinds of bills can have a bigger impact on the community, bro. They can help bring people together and create a sense of pride and ownership. So, while it might seem like a small thing, it's still a rad way to recognize some awesome individuals and make a positive impact on the community.

Anyway, that's HR 8225 in a nutshell, dude. It's a chill bill that's all about giving a post office a new name and honoring some cool people. Not too complicated, but still pretty cool, bro!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

HR 8225, introduced by Representative Moore of Utah and cosponsored by Representatives Maloy, Owens, and Kennedy, all from Utah, designates the United States Postal Service facility located at 111 South Tremont Street in Tremonton, Utah, as the "Sorensen-Estrada Post Office". This bill is a classic example of a commemorative naming legislation, which often serves as a way for lawmakers to honor local figures or constituents without requiring significant policy changes or funding commitments.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective of HR 8225 is to rename the postal facility in Tremonton, Utah, in recognition of Sorensen and Estrada, likely individuals of significance to the local community. This type of legislation allows lawmakers to demonstrate their connection to their constituents and acknowledge notable figures or events without affecting broader policy.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill consists of two main sections: Section 1(a) designates the facility as the "Sorensen-Estrada Post Office", and Section 1(b) ensures that any references to the facility in federal laws, maps, regulations, or documents will be updated to reflect its new name. This change is purely ceremonial and does not alter the operational aspects of the postal facility or the services it provides.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The primary stakeholders affected by this legislation are the local community in Tremonton, Utah, and the United States Postal Service (USPS). The renaming of the facility may have symbolic importance for the community, potentially boosting local pride. For the USPS, the change requires minimal administrative updates to reflect the new name on official documents and signage.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The impact of HR 8225 is largely ceremonial and localized. It does not involve significant funding, policy changes, or regulatory shifts that could have broader implications for the postal service or federal governance. The bill's passage would primarily serve as a gesture of recognition to Sorensen and Estrada, contributing to community morale rather than affecting national policy.

In terms of monied interests, this type of legislation typically does not attract significant lobbying efforts or donations from major PACs, as it does not directly impact industry interests or policy outcomes. The support for such bills often comes from local constituents and community groups rather than national special interest organizations. Therefore, the financial influence behind HR 8225 is likely minimal and localized, reflecting the bill's nature as a commemorative gesture rather than a substantive policy initiative.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Moore, Blake D. [R-UT-1]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$99,500

21 donors

PACs

Organizations

$18,200

Committees

Individuals

$81,300

No PAC contributions found

JLS HOLDINGS LLC

1 transaction

$9,900

THE CHICKASAW NATION

1 transaction

$3,300

HEMMCO LLC

1 transaction

$2,500

R & O CONSTRUCTION

1 transaction

$2,500

No committee contributions found

MOORE, BRENT

2 transactions

$12,000

LOCKWOOD, DAVID

3 transactions

$9,900

PARKER, ALEXANDRA

1 transaction

$6,600

PARKER, SEAN

1 transaction

$6,600

KAUFMAN, TRENT

1 transaction

$6,600

CHANG, JASON

1 transaction

$3,300

REHNERT, GEOFFREY

1 transaction

$3,300

HALL, JEREMY

1 transaction

$3,300

FORREST, CHAD B

1 transaction

$3,300

WALKER, TODD

1 transaction

$3,300

BAILEY, BRETT M.

1 transaction

$3,300

BAILEY, KIM

1 transaction

$3,300

FORREST, SHANNON

1 transaction

$3,300

DUHAMEL, WILLIAM F.

1 transaction

$3,300

SMITH, BURR

1 transaction

$3,300

EDWARDS, TAMMY

1 transaction

$3,300

FORREST, CLINT

1 transaction

$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 3 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Maloy, Celeste [R-UT-2]

ID: M001228

Top Contributors

THE UTE INDIAN TRIBE

OrganizationFORT DUCHESNE, UT

$3,300

Nov 9, 2024

THE UTE INDIAN TRIBE

OrganizationFORT DUCHESNE, UT

$3,300

Nov 9, 2024

HOLT, CLIFF

HURRICANE FAMILY PHARMACY • OWNER

IndividualHURRICANE, UT

$3,300

Oct 17, 2024

RICKETTS, MARLENE

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualOMAHA, NE

$3,300

Oct 24, 2024

IPSON, DON L.

N/A • RETIRED

IndividualSAINT GEORGE, UT

$3,300

Dec 27, 2023

MCMAHON, LINDA E.

MCMAHON VENTURES • EXECUTIVE

IndividualGREENWICH, CT

$3,300

Dec 15, 2023

SCHWAB, CHARLES

CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION • CHAIRMAN

IndividualPALM BEACH, FL

$3,300

Dec 19, 2023

ARNOLD, JOHN

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$3,300

Mar 26, 2024

BURGESS, BRETT

DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC. • PRESIDENT

IndividualSAINT GEORGE, UT

$3,300

Mar 29, 2024

DEATON, TYLER

ALLEGIANCE STRATEGIES, LLC • PRESIDENT

IndividualCALHOUN, GA

$3,300

Mar 20, 2024

Rep. Owens, Burgess [R-UT-4]

ID: O000086

Top Contributors

UTE INDIAN TRIBE

OrganizationFORT DUCHESNE, UT

$3,300

Nov 12, 2024

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationBANNING, CA

$2,000

Sep 30, 2024

PALMER, JEFFERY

NONE • RETIRED

IndividualMAPLETON, UT

$13,200

May 29, 2023

JENKINS, JAMES W.

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualSALT LAKE CITY, UT

$10,000

May 13, 2024

HOLSCHER, KELLY

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualPACIFIC PALISADES, CA

$6,600

Aug 22, 2024

LISONBEE, DAVID

4LIFE RESEARCH • BUSINESS OWNER

IndividualPROVO, UT

$6,600

Mar 19, 2024

OVERHOLT, DAVID W. MR.

UNIFIED PURCHASING GROUP • PRESIDENT

IndividualSOUTH JORDAN, UT

$6,600

Apr 3, 2024

DAICHENDT, JOE

ACI JET • BUSINESS OWNER

IndividualLADERA RANCH, CA

$6,600

Mar 16, 2023

GRIFFIN, KENNETH

CITADEL LLC • FOUNDER CEO

IndividualMIAMI BEACH, FL

$6,600

Apr 10, 2023

PALMER, KELLY

NONE • RETIRED

IndividualMAPLETON, UT

$6,600

Jun 13, 2023

Rep. Kennedy, Mike [R-UT-3]

ID: K000403

Top Contributors

ULRICH, DAVE

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN • PROFESSOR

IndividualALPINE, UT

$10,000

Jun 5, 2024

BRENCHLEY, ROXANE

HOMEMAKER • HOMEMAKER

IndividualALPINE, UT

$9,900

Jan 12, 2024

BRENCHLEY, SHAWN

VIVINT • VP

IndividualALPINE, UT

$9,900

Jan 12, 2024

JOHNSON, HEATHER

SELF • HOMEMAKER

IndividualOGDEN, UT

$9,900

Jan 12, 2024

JOHNSON, JOHN

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualOGDEN, UT

$9,900

Jan 12, 2024

KENNEDY, HUGH

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualYPSILANTI, MI

$9,900

Jan 12, 2024

KENNEDY, JACOB

DEACONESS HOSPITAL • DOCTOR

IndividualEVANSVILLE, IN

$9,900

Mar 15, 2024

ULANOFF, DORY

ARCADIS • MARKETING

IndividualYPSILANTI, MI

$9,900

Jan 12, 2024

ZUPANCICH, ANTHONY

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualSAINT CLAIR SHORES, MI

$9,900

Mar 27, 2024

PLUMB, WALTER III

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualSALT LAKE CITY, UT

$6,700

Jan 12, 2024

Donor Network - Rep. Moore, Blake D. [R-UT-1]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 53 nodes and 33 connections (46 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $157,700

Top Donors - Rep. Moore, Blake D. [R-UT-1]

Showing top 21 donors by contribution amount

4 Orgs17 Individuals

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Homeland Security

Minimal

Vector: 52%

Pages: 201-204AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill merely renames a post office and has no connection to Department of Homeland Security or State Department policy objectives outlined in Project 2025."

Key themes:no overlapunrelated

— 169 — Department of Homeland Security 19. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Office of Inspector General, Management Directive No. 0810.1, June 10, 2004, https://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/foia/mgmt_directive_0810_1_the_office_of_inspector_general. pdf (accessed March 15, 2023). 20. H.R. 5005, Homeland Security Act of 2002, Public Law No. 107-296, 107th Congress, November 25, 2002, https://www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/house-bill/5005 (accessed January 18, 2023). — 171 — 6 DEPARTMENT OF STATE Kiron K. Skinner The U.S. Department of State’s mission is to bilaterally, multilaterally, and regionally implement the President’s foreign policy priorities; to serve U.S. citizens abroad; and to advance the economic, foreign policy, and national security interests of the United States. Since the U.S. Founding, the Department of State has been the American gov- ernment’s designated tool of engagement with foreign governments and peoples throughout the world. Country names, borders, leaders, technology, and people have changed in the more than two centuries since the Founding, but the basics of diplomacy remain the same. Although the Department has also evolved throughout the years, at least in the modern era, there is one significant problem that the next President must address to be successful. There are scores of fine diplomats who serve the President’s agenda, often helping to shape and interpret that agenda. At the same time, however, in all Administrations, there is a tug-of-war between Presidents and bureaucracies— and that resistance is much starker under conservative Presidents, due largely to the fact that large swaths of the State Department’s workforce are left-wing and predisposed to disagree with a conservative President’s policy agenda and vision. It should not and cannot be this way: The American people need and deserve a diplomatic machine fully focused on the national interest as defined through the election of a President who sets the domestic and international agenda for the nation. The next Administration must take swift and decisive steps to reforge the department into a lean and functional diplomatic machine that serves the

Trade

Minimal

Vector: 51%

Pages: 813-815AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill concerns naming a post office and has no relation to trade policy objectives such as reducing trade deficits or tariffs outlined in Project 2025's Trade section."

— 781 — Trade 5 ELBAT )8 fo 8 egaP( noisserggA cimonocE fo seirogetaC s’anihC tsinummoC erutpaC gnigremE hceT-hgiH taht seirtsudnI erutuF evirD yeK eriuqcA dna eruceS tcetorP dna htworG seigolonhceT etanimoD lortnoC emoH s'anihC stnemecnavdA morf PI dna lanoitidarT larutaN eroC s’anihC dnapxE morf tekraM ,seiciloP ,stcA s'anihC esnefeD ni seirtnuoC rehtO gnirutcafunaM secruoseR labolG fo erahS noititepmoC fo secitcarP dna yrtsudnI .S.U eht dna seirtsudnI yllabolG stekraM stropmI dna noisserggA cimonocE ,gnikeeS-ygolonhceT % % % ngieroF detceriD-etatS tnemtsevnI tceriD % % % tfarcypS lanoitidarT gnipmuditnA edavE ot pihssnarT % seituD gniliavretnuoC dna stnemtsujdA xaT deddA-eulaV % % ezidisbuS setabeR dna stropxE esenihC decrofnE ylxaL dna kaeW % % swaL latnemnorivnE seigolonhceT eht snetaerhT noisserggA cimonocE s’anihC woH ,yciloP gnirutcafunaM dna edarT fo ecffi O esuoH etihW :ECRUOS /tnetnoc-pw/vog.sevihcra.esuohetihwpmurt//:sptth ,8102 enuJ ,dlroW eht dna setatS detinU eht fo ytreporP lautcelletnI dna gro.egatireh A .)3202 ,12 hcraM dessecca( fdp.FDP-81.81.6-tropeR-ygolonhceT-anihC-LANIF/60/8102/sdaolpu — 782 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise reduction in the U.S. bilateral trade deficit with India. Similarly, if Taiwan were to reduce its tariffs to U.S. levels, the size of the U.S. bilateral trade deficit with Taiwan would fall by 6 percent. If the U.S. imposed a mirror tariff, its bilateral trade deficit with Taiwan would fall by 59 percent. These results again underscore the high degree of unfair, unbalanced, and nonreciprocal trade that currently exists between the U.S. and much of the rest of the world, which penalizes American farmers, ranchers, manufacturers, and workers because of the WTO-MFN conundrum. These simulations also demon- strate that implementation of the USRTA most likely would substantially reduce the U.S. trade deficit while creating hundreds of thousands of new jobs. These benefits notwithstanding, however, the U.S. would still face a substantial over- all trade deficit and substantial bilateral trade deficits with many of its major trading partners. Why might this be so? Because under WTO rules, America still faces numerous nonreciprocal nontariff barriers around the world. For example, one of America’s largest trading partners, Japan, runs a significant bilateral trade surplus in goods with the U.S.—more than $70 billion a year. While Japan has relatively low tariffs, it ranks high on the nontariff barrier scale. In such cases, which are numerous, pas- sage of the USRTA would likely also be very helpful in reducing nontariff barriers. This is because under the powers provided by the USRTA, if a foreign country imposes significantly higher nontariff barriers, then the President has the authority to “negotiate and seek to enter into an agreement” that “commits the country to… eliminate [its] nontariff barriers.”16 If the country refuses to come to the negoti- ating table and lower its nontariff barriers, the President has the authority to levy reciprocal duties to offset or mirror those barriers. In summary, passage of the USRTA would go a long way toward leveling the playing field for American farmers, ranchers, manufacturers, and workers who are now forced to compete in an intrinsically unfair, unbalanced, and nonreciprocal WTO-MFN system. Nor is the USRTA necessarily the only possible legislative way to address this issue. In 2017, then-House Speaker Paul Ryan (R–WI) and then-House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Kevin Brady (R–TX) proposed a “border adjust- ment tax.” The proposed border adjustment would have eliminated the ability of corporations to deduct the cost of imports while eliminating the tax on income attributable to exports. This border adjustment tax would have shifted the U.S. corporate income tax from an origin-based tax applying to the production of goods and services in the United States to a destination-based tax applying to the con- sumption of goods and services in the U.S. This tax—strongly opposed by American multinational corporations and big- box retailers—not only would have leveled the playing field with respect to WTO rules, but also would have provided an innovative alternative to the application of

Department of Commerce

Minimal

Vector: 51%

Pages: 717-719AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill merely renames a post office and has no substantive connection to the Department of Commerce objectives outlined in Project 2025, such as minority business data clearinghouse, IP protection, or standards initiatives."

— 685 — Department of Commerce l Establishing MBDA as a data and research clearinghouse for minority business enterprises and policymakers; l Coordinating amongst Cabinet agencies, state and local government, and trade associations to best leverage resources and encourage growth and innovation; and l Evaluating the harmful effects of unfair trade practices on minority-owned businesses and their employees. U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office carries out a core constitutional man- date from Section 8, Article 1: “The Congress shall have Power...[t]o promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discover- ies.” Strong intellectual property (IP) protections form the bedrock of American business and are a key factor in making the U.S. economy the most innovative in the world. As such, a conservative Administration must constantly work to strengthen IP rights and combat the incorrect view that strong IP rights some- how limit innovation. Political leadership in a new conservative Administration should: l Support like-minded countries as candidates for leadership in the World Intellectual Property Organization and build strong relationships with international partners to strengthen intellectual property rights. l Re-examine patent eligibility requirements in Section 101 of the Patent Act7 and support internal and/or legislative reforms to enable U.S. leadership in critical and emerging technologies such as quantum computing, 5G, and artificial intelligence. l Take a balanced approach to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and prioritize rapid and transparent processing of applications and appeals. l Work with Administration partners and Congress to find and punish trademark infringers and counterfeiters. l Oppose efforts to provide intellectual property waivers for cutting-edge technologies, including for COVID-19 vaccines and therapeutics, through the World Trade Organization’s Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights agreement or any other mechanism. — 686 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY The National Institute of Standards and Technology is charged with promoting U.S. innovation and competitiveness by “advancing measurement science, standards, and technology.”8 NIST carries out cutting edge research, helps industry establish standards and best practices, and is the nation’s foremost authority on measurements. NIST’s atomic clock, for instance, maintains the official time of the United States. An incoming Administration should evaluate the federal government’s civilian research footprint and consolidate those functions while ensuring that any research conducted with taxpayer dollars serves the national interest in a concrete way in line with conservative principles. Beyond this, an incoming Administration should: l Privatize the Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership. The Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) establishes and manages a network of centers focused on advising small- and medium-sized manufacturers in order to improve processes and thereby strengthen the U.S. industrial base. When Congress created the program, MEP centers were intended to transition to self-sustaining private institutions after using government funds to begin operations, but the prohibition on long-term funding was abolished in 1998. MEP’s business advisory services would be more properly carried out by the private sector. The next Administration should propose legislation to zero out this $150 million program and fully privatize existing MEP centers. l Transfer the Baldridge Performance Excellence Program. This program’s “process” assists companies in improving management and operations, a function more properly and effectively carried out by the private sector. This program operates at a cost to taxpayers, despite thousands of dollars in fees charged to each participating company or entity and long-term plans to make the program self-sufficient. Maintenance and operation of the program should be entirely handed over to the Baldridge Award Foundation to be run by non-government staff via fees. l Increase value to taxpayers. NIST should reinvigorate the Technology Transfer and ROI (return on investment) initiatives begun under the Trump Administration. These initiatives help speed the process of commercializing science funded by the federal government. l Reestablish U.S. dominance in international standards. NIST should explore ways to incentivize broader U.S. participation in standards-setting bodies and the exclusion of participants from adversaries like China. Standards are set to facilitate trade in countries that utilize those standards: Countries

Department of the Treasury

Minimal

Vector: 51%

Pages: 742-744AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill solely renames a post office and does not address Treasury climate policy, ESG initiatives, energy investment, or any of the Project 2025 Department of the Treasury objectives."

— 709 — Department of the Treasury principal goals. The next Administration should eliminate the Climate Hub Office and withdraw from climate change agreements that are inimical to the prosperity of the United States. The Climate Hub office “coordinates Treasury’s work to inform, guide, incen- tivize, and mobilize financial flows for climate mitigation and climate adaptation and supports the broader alignment of the financial system with a path to net- zero emissions by mid-century.“71 According to the Biden Administration’s Fiscal Year 2022–2026 Strategic Plan for Treasury, the fourth of five Treasury strategic goals reads: Combat Climate Change The United States and the world face a climate crisis and a narrowing window of action to avoid the worst impacts of climate change. At the same time, the transition to a low carbon economy represents a historic economic opportunity for the U.S. and global economy. The U.S. federal government must work alongside our domestic and international partners to respond ambitiously to tackle the challenges of climate change, adapt to an already changing climate, mitigate the risks, and position the global economy for clean and sustainable growth.72 Yet history shows that economic growth and technological/scientific advance through human ingenuity are by far the best ways to prevent and mitigate extreme weather events. Moreover, virtually all of the initiatives that the Biden Administra- tion has adopted would, even if successful, have a de minimis impact on changing global weather patterns, in part because most nations—notably China—are not cooperating with climate summits and international agreements. Virtually all nations, for example, that signed the Paris Agreement73 have not met their treaty obligations. Such routinely violated treaties weaken the U.S. economy with no off- setting societal benefits. To that end, the next conservative Administration should withdraw the U.S. from the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change74 and the Paris Agreement. The next Administration should use Treasury’s tools and authority to promote investment in domestic energy, including oil and gas. It should reverse support for international public- (and private-) based efforts promoting Environmental, Social, and Governance75 and Principles for Responsible Investment,76 both of which have badly damaged U.S. energy security. OTHER REFORMS U.S. Coast Guard and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives. Congress should examine whether to return the Treasury’s former — 710 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise in-house law enforcement capabilities via the return of the United States Coast Guard and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives. Bringing these agencies back from the Department of Homeland Security and the Depart- ment of Justice, respectively, would allow Treasury, in the case of U.S. Coast Guard, to increase border security via a vigilance with respect to economic crimes (for example, drug smuggling and tax evasion). U.S. Trade and Development Agency. Congress should eliminate the U.S. Trade and Development Agency (USTDA). The USTDA is intended to help com- panies create U.S. jobs through the export of U.S. goods and services for priority development projects in emerging economies. The USTDA links U.S. businesses to export opportunities by funding project planning activities, pilot projects, and reverse-trade missions while creating sustainable infrastructure and economic growth in partner countries. These activities more properly belong to the private sector. The best way to promote trade and development is to reduce tariff and non-tariff trade barriers. Another way is to reduce the federal budget deficit, and thereby federal borrowing from abroad, freeing more foreign dollars to be spent on U.S. exports instead of federal treasury bonds. Other Issues. Many Treasury Department issues cut across multiple parts of Treasury or other governmental agencies. Several are discussed in this chapter, but not all can be covered here in depth. Other issues of concern include China, cybersecurity, digital assets, digital services taxes, international debt defaults, Iran, Social Security and Medicare Trust Funds and private sector pensions, sanctions policy, and treasury auction and debt issuance. AUTHORS’ NOTE: The preparation of this chapter was a collective enterprise of individuals involved in the 2025 Presidential Transition Project. All contributors to this chapter are listed at the front of this volume, but Monica Crowley, Tom Dans, John Berlau, Austin Bramwell, Preston Brashers, Alexandra Harrison Gaiser, Nathan Hitchen, Adam Korzeniewski, and Jonathan Moy deserve special mention. The authors alone assume responsibility for the content of this chapter, and no views expressed herein should be attributed to any other individual.

Department of Homeland Security

Minimal

Vector: 51%

Pages: 183-185AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill concerns naming a post office and has no relation to DHS immigration enforcement or employment authorization policies outlined in Project 2025."

— 151 — Department of Homeland Security l Employment authorization. Along with the legislative proposal, take regulatory action to limit the classes of aliens eligible for work authorization. Executive Orders l Pathways for border crossers 1. Direct the Department of State and the Department of Homeland Security to reinstate Asylum Cooperative Agreements with Northern Triangle Countries immediately. 2. Recommence negotiations with Mexico to fully implement the Remain in Mexico Protocols. 3. Reinstate, to the extent possible, expedited pathways with full credible fear/immigration court process (PACR and HARP). 4. Prohibit the use of Notices to Report, the use of any funds for travel into the interior of the United States, and government flights or transportation for aliens. 5. Mandate that ICE use all detention space in full compliance with Section 235 of the INA, issue weekly reports on detention capacity, and provide authority for low-level temporary capacity (for example, tents) once permanent space is full. 6. Eliminate the use of ATD for border crossers except in rare cases and only with the explicit authority of the Secretary. 7. Prohibit the use of parole except in matters that are certified by the Secretary of Homeland Security as requiring action for humanitarian or significant public benefit reasons, and prohibit the use of parole in any categorical circumstance. l Enforcement 1. Restrict prosecutorial discretion to eliminate it as a “catch-all” excuse for limiting immigration enforcement. 2. Mandate the use of E-Verify for anyone doing business with the government. — 152 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 3. Designate USCIS as Intelligence Community–adjacent, ensuring that it has access to national security and law enforcement databases. 4. Rescind all memoranda limiting enforcement of immigration laws including those identifying sensitive zones. 5. End ICE’s widespread use of termination and administrative closure of cases in immigration court. l Averting or curtailing a mass migration event 1. Provide that whenever the Secretary of Homeland Security determines that an actual or anticipated mass migration of aliens en route to or arriving off the coast of the U.S. presents urgent circumstances requiring an immediate federal response, the Secretary may make, subject to the approval of the President, rules and regulations prohibiting in whole or in part the introduction of persons from such countries or places as he or she shall designate in order to avert or curtail such mass migration and for such period of time as is deemed necessary, including through the expulsion of such aliens. Such rule and regulation making shall not be subject to the requirements of the Administrative Procedures Act. 2. Provide that notwithstanding any other provision of law, when the Secretary makes such a determination and then promulgates, subject to the approval of the President, such rules and regulations, the Secretary shall have the authority to waive all legal requirements of Title 8 that the Secretary, in his or her sole discretion, determines are necessary to avert or curtail the mass migration. Subregulatory Matters l USCIS priorities/structural changes 1. Ensure that focus is returned to vetting, base eligibility of applicants, and fraud detection. 2. Realign the Fraud Detection and National Security Directorate (FDNS) to ensure agencywide consistency on implementation of fraud detection and vetting policies. 3. Review and repeal any internal agency memo that is inconsistent with the priorities described in this chapter.

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Rep. Moore, Blake D.

Fair Treatment of Religious Organizations Act of 2026

119/hr/9722

Hershel Woody Williams National Medal of Honor Monument Location Act

119/hr/186

MAPWaters Act of 2025

119/hr/187

Back to All Bills