Hershel Woody Williams National Medal of Honor Monument Location Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/186
Last Updated: January 15, 2026

Sponsored by

Rep. Moore, Blake D. [R-UT-1]

ID: M001213

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on National Parks. Hearings held.

December 9, 2025

Introduced

Committee Review

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed House

🏛️

Senate Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, brought to you by the same geniuses who thought it was a good idea to put a monument to the "War on Terror" in the middle of the National Mall.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Hershel Woody Williams National Medal of Honor Monument Location Act is a bill that's supposed to honor the Medal of Honor recipients by authorizing a commemorative work on the National Mall. But let's be real, folks, this is just a thinly veiled attempt to pander to veterans' groups and score some cheap patriotic points.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill essentially overrides existing law (40 U.S.C. 8908(c)) to allow the National Medal of Honor Museum Foundation to build their monument within the Reserve, which is a fancy way of saying "right next to the Lincoln Memorial." Because what's more American than building a monument to ourselves right next to Honest Abe?

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are involved here: veterans' groups, politicians looking for photo ops, and the National Medal of Honor Museum Foundation, which is probably just a front for some wealthy donors who want their names on a plaque.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill will have all the impact of a feather landing on a pillow. It's a symbolic gesture that won't actually do anything to help veterans or improve the country. But hey, it'll make for great campaign ads and press releases! The real implication here is that our politicians are more interested in grandstanding than actual governance.

Diagnosis: This bill is suffering from a severe case of "Patriotism-itis," a disease characterized by an excessive desire to appear patriotic without actually doing anything meaningful. Symptoms include empty rhetoric, pointless legislation, and a complete lack of substance. Treatment: a healthy dose of skepticism and a strong stomach for the inevitable disappointment that comes with watching our politicians in action.

Prognosis: This bill will pass with flying colors, because who doesn't love a good patriotic gesture? But don't expect it to actually accomplish anything worthwhile. It's just another example of our government's ability to waste time and resources on meaningless gestures while ignoring the real problems facing this country.

Related Topics

Government Operations & Accountability Criminal Justice & Law Enforcement National Security & Intelligence Small Business & Entrepreneurship State & Local Government Affairs Civil Rights & Liberties Congressional Rules & Procedures Transportation & Infrastructure Federal Budget & Appropriations
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Moore, Blake D. [R-UT-1]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$90,350
20 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$90,350
Committees
$0
Individuals
$0

No PAC contributions found

1
JLS HOLDINGS LLC
1 transaction
$9,900
2
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
4 transactions
$8,600
3
POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS
2 transactions
$6,600
4
MUSCOGEE CREEK NATION
2 transactions
$6,600
5
ONEIDA NATION
2 transactions
$6,600
6
FOREST COUNTY POTAWATOMI COMMUNITY
2 transactions
$6,200
7
PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS
2 transactions
$6,200
8
AK-CHIN INDIAN COMMUNITY
2 transactions
$5,800
9
CHEROKEE NATION
2 transactions
$5,300
10
THE CHICKASAW NATION
1 transaction
$3,300
11
AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS
1 transaction
$3,300
12
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
1 transaction
$3,300
13
PECHANGA BAND OF LUISENO INDIANS
1 transaction
$3,300
14
SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA
1 transaction
$3,300
15
HO-CHUNK NATION
1 transaction
$3,300
16
HEMMCO LLC
1 transaction
$2,500
17
R & O CONSTRUCTION
1 transaction
$2,500
18
TRIBAL OPERATIONS
1 transaction
$2,500
19
SISTERS MOVEMENT
1 transaction
$1,000
20
RAHMAN PROPERTIES
1 transaction
$250

No committee contributions found

No individual contributions found

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 8 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Veasey, Marc A. [D-TX-33]

ID: V000131

Top Contributors

10

1
ALABAMA-COUSHATTA TRIBE
Organization LIVINGSTON, TX
$1,000
Sep 26, 2024
2
BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, LLC
Organization WASHINGTON, DC
$500
Mar 5, 2024
3
LAW OFFICE OF FREDERICK GRAEFE PLLC
Organization WASHINGTON, DC
$500
Sep 21, 2023
4
BILLINGSLEY, LINDSAY
NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED
Individual DALLAS, TX
$3,300
Dec 23, 2023
5
ENGLANDER, MARTY
NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED
Individual FORT WORTH, TX
$3,300
Oct 13, 2023
6
ENGLANDER, MARTY
NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED
Individual FORT WORTH, TX
$3,300
Oct 13, 2023
7
FINLEY, JAMES D.
FINLEY RESOURCES, INC. • OWNER/CEO
Individual FT WORTH, TX
$3,300
Dec 31, 2023
8
FINLEY, JAMES D.
FINLEY RESOURCES, INC. • OWNER/CEO
Individual FT WORTH, TX
$3,300
Dec 31, 2023
9
FLOWERS, BRIAN
SELF • PHYSICIAN
Individual WESTLAKE, TX
$3,300
Nov 6, 2023
10
FLOWERS, BRIAN
SELF • PHYSICIAN
Individual WESTLAKE, TX
$3,300
Nov 6, 2023

Rep. Webster, Daniel [R-FL-11]

ID: W000806

Top Contributors

10

1
SILVERMAN, JEFFREY
Individual SURFSIDE, FL
$6,600
Apr 18, 2024
2
BRADLEY, JACQUELINE
RETIRED • RETIRED
Individual KESWICK, VA
$6,600
Apr 15, 2024
3
SILVERMAN, JEFFREY
RETIRED • RETIRED
Individual SURFSIDE, FL
$6,600
Feb 15, 2024
4
FILBURN, MARK
WHITESTONE CONSTRUCTION • PRESIDENT
Individual LONGWOOD, FL
$3,400
Jun 26, 2024
5
FILBURN, MARK
Individual LONGWOOD, FL
$3,400
Sep 4, 2024
6
ASNESS, CLIFF
AQR • EXECUTIVE
Individual NEW YORK, NY
$3,300
Jun 6, 2024
7
ASNESS, LAUREL
MARCUM LLP • EXECUTIVE
Individual NEW YORK, NY
$3,300
Jun 6, 2024
8
BEUCHER, NICK
CEO • TAVISTOCK FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Individual ORLANDO, FL
$3,300
May 28, 2024
9
BRADLEY, JACQUELINE
RETIRED • RETIRED
Individual KESWICK, VA
$3,300
Apr 18, 2024
10
DEVORE, DEBBIE
SEA & SHORELINE • ACCOUNTANT
Individual WINTER GARDEN, FL
$3,300
May 31, 2024

Rep. Ellzey, Jake [R-TX-6]

ID: E000071

Top Contributors

10

1
CHEROKEE NATION
Organization TAHLEQUAH, OK
$3,300
Nov 5, 2024
2
BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS AGUA CALIENTE
Organization PALM SPRINGS, CA
$3,300
Feb 9, 2024
3
INDIAN COMMUNITY AK-CHIN
Organization MARICOPA, AZ
$3,300
Feb 9, 2024
4
BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS AGUA CALIENTE
Organization PALM SPRINGS, CA
$3,300
Sep 30, 2024
5
PECHANGA BAND OF INDIANS
Organization TEMECULA, CA
$3,000
Nov 6, 2023
6
CHEROKEE NATION
Organization TAHLEQUAH, OK
$2,500
Dec 11, 2023
7
TIGUA INDIAN RESERVATION TRIBAL COUNCIL GENERAL FUND
Organization EL PASO, TX
$2,500
Aug 9, 2023
8
INDIAN COMMUNITY AK-CHIN
Organization MARICOPA, AZ
$2,000
Sep 30, 2024
9
ALABAMA-COUSHATTA TRIBE
Organization LIVINGSTON, TX
$1,000
Oct 16, 2024
10
TALK FARMS
Organization ITASCA, TX
$500
Dec 31, 2023

Rep. Miller, Carol D. [R-WV-1]

ID: M001205

Top Contributors

10

1
WINRED PAC
PAC ARLINGTON, VA
$13,010
Mar 31, 2023
2
SAC & FOX TRIBE OF THE MISSISSIPPI IN IOWA
COM TAMA, IA
$1,000
Aug 11, 2023
3
RENEWABLE ENERGY, CITIZENS FOR
COM MADISON, WI
$500
Aug 20, 2024
4
POLITICAL COMMITTEE, NWF ACTION FUND
PAC WASHINGTON, DC
$500
Sep 18, 2024
5
ADAMS MEMORIALS
Organization CHARLESTON, IL
$1,000
Mar 23, 2023
6
VAHLING VINEYARDS
Organization STEWARDSON, IL
$500
Jan 11, 2024
7
THE CHICKASAW NATION
Organization ADA, OK
$1,000
Jun 20, 2023
8
US MARSHALS SERVICES
Organization NEW YORK, NY
$2,900
Apr 20, 2023
9
HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP
Organization RICHMOND, VA
$1,000
Mar 22, 2023
10
KASPAR, SCOTT
KASPAR LAW COMPANY • LAWYER
Individual ORLAND PARK, IL
$13,200
Mar 22, 2023

Rep. Luna, Anna Paulina [R-FL-13]

ID: L000596

Top Contributors

10

1
POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS
Organization ATMORE, AL
$3,300
Sep 15, 2023
2
DUKE ENERGY
Organization WASHINGTON, DC
$1,000
Sep 29, 2023
3
MOGHADAM, SHAHAB
APPLIED MATERIALS • PROJECT MANAGER
Individual SARATOGA, CA
$5,800
Aug 15, 2024
4
JACOBS, TERRENCE S
PENNECO • PRESIDENT & CEO
Individual WINDERMERE, FL
$3,300
Jul 22, 2024
5
WALTER, JENNIFER
RETIRED • RETIRED
Individual LEWISVILLE, TX
$3,300
Jul 5, 2024
6
WALTER, DAVID
RETIRED • RETIRED
Individual LEWISVILLE, TX
$3,300
Jul 5, 2024
7
TVEDTEN, TYRONE
SUNCOAST FAMILY MEDICAL • PHYSICIAN
Individual REDINGTON BEACH, FL
$3,300
Jul 23, 2024
8
WALTER, DAVID
RETIRED • RETIRED
Individual LEWISVILLE, TX
$3,300
Jul 5, 2024
9
WALTER, JENNIFER
RETIRED • RETIRED
Individual LEWISVILLE, TX
$3,300
Jul 5, 2024
10
RENO, MATHEW J
RETIRED • RETIRED
Individual GILLETTE, WY
$3,300
Jun 11, 2024

Rep. LaLota, Nick [R-NY-1]

ID: L000598

Top Contributors

10

1
DEMOCRACY ENGINE, INC., PAC
Organization WASHINGTON, DC
$1,000
Mar 28, 2024
2
BARATTA, JOSEPH P II
BLACKSTONE • FINANCE EXECUTIVE
Individual NEW YORK, NY
$6,600
Mar 31, 2023
3
SCHWARZMAN, CHRISTINE
RETIRED • RETIRED
Individual NEW YORK, NY
$6,600
Mar 30, 2023
4
SCHWARZMAN, STEPHEN
BLACKSTONE
Individual NEW YORK, NY
$6,600
Mar 29, 2023
5
SABIN, ANDREW
SABIN METAL CORP • OWNER
Individual NEW YORK, NY
$6,600
Mar 6, 2023
6
DEGEORGE, JOSEPH
ST. PAULY TEXTILE, INC. • PRESIDENT
Individual BRANCHPORT, NY
$6,600
Mar 13, 2023
7
XU, MAODONG
FRESH2 TECHNOLOGY INC • ADVISOR
Individual NEW YORK, NY
$6,600
Mar 30, 2023
8
SILVERMAN, JEFFREY
RETIRED • RETIRED
Individual SURFSIDE, FL
$6,600
Oct 17, 2023
9
SINGER, PAUL
ELLIOTT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT • CO-CEO, CO-CIO, PRESIDENT
Individual PALM BEACH, FL
$6,600
Oct 18, 2023
10
GILLIAM, RICHARD
CUMBERLAND DEV. • MANAGER
Individual CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA
$6,600
Nov 21, 2023

Rep. Hunt, Wesley [R-TX-38]

ID: H001095

Top Contributors

10

1
HOCKEYSTICK LLC
Organization SILVER SPRINGS, MD
$857
Apr 22, 2024
2
HUNT, RAY L.
HUNT CONSOLIDATED • CEO
Individual DALLAS, TX
$6,600
Feb 14, 2024
3
CARAYANNOPOULOS, GEORGE
UTMB • PHYSICIAN
Individual HOUSTON, TX
$6,600
Mar 29, 2024
4
FLORY, DAVID
NONE • RETIRED
Individual MIAMI BEACH, FL
$6,600
May 7, 2024
5
ROWLING, ROBERT B. MR.
TRT HOLDINGS • FOUNDER
Individual DALLAS, TX
$6,600
Dec 31, 2023
6
HILDEBRAND, MELINDA MRS.
SELF - HILCORP VENTURES • PRESIDENT
Individual HOUSTON, TX
$5,000
Mar 20, 2023
7
HLAVINKA, TOBIAS M. MR.
AMERICAN PLANT FOOD • VP OF SALES/AGRICULTURE
Individual HOUSTON, TX
$5,000
Feb 20, 2023
8
HARTZOGE, ALLISON
ARCHWAY SUPPORT • LPC-S
Individual MIDLAND, TX
$5,000
Apr 11, 2023
9
CHILDERS, DOUGLAS
ARCHROCK • MANAGER
Individual HOUSTON, TX
$3,435
Mar 31, 2024
10
HARTZOGE, ALLISON
ARCHWAY SUPPORT • LPC-S
Individual MIDLAND, TX
$3,400
Apr 18, 2023

Rep. Carbajal, Salud O. [D-CA-24]

ID: C001112

Top Contributors

10

1
PECHANGA BAND OF LUISENO INDIANS
Organization TEMECULA, CA
$3,300
Oct 18, 2023
2
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
Organization HIGHLAND, CA
$3,300
Dec 18, 2023
3
AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS
Organization PALM SPRINGS, CA
$3,300
Jan 11, 2024
4
SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
Organization SANTA YNEZ, CA
$3,300
Feb 24, 2023
5
SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
Organization SANTA YNEZ, CA
$3,300
Feb 24, 2023
6
FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA
Organization ROHNERT PARK, CA
$3,300
Jun 30, 2023
7
FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA
Organization ROHNERT PARK, CA
$3,300
Jun 30, 2023
8
BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
Organization LAKESIDE, CA
$2,000
Jun 26, 2024
9
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
Organization BANNING, CA
$2,000
Sep 21, 2023
10
MS BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS
Organization CHOCTAW, MS
$1,500
Dec 19, 2023

Donor Network - Rep. Moore, Blake D. [R-UT-1]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 38 nodes and 45 connections

Total contributions: $146,660

Top Donors - Rep. Moore, Blake D. [R-UT-1]

Showing top 20 donors by contribution amount

20 Orgs

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document. Higher similarity scores indicate stronger thematic connections.

Introduction

Low 43.7%
Pages: 575-577

— 543 — Department of the Interior 68. Karen Budd Falen, “Biden’s ‘30 By 30 Plan’: A Slap at American Private Property Rights,” Cowboy State Daily, April 15, 2021, https://cowboystatedaily.com/2021/04/15/bidens-30-by-30-plan-a-slap-at-american-private- property-rights/ (accessed March 16, 2023). 69. U.S. Department of the Interior, “Order No. 3396: Rescission of Secretary’s Order 3388, ‘Land and Water Conservation Fund Implementation by the U.S. Department of the Interior,’” February 11, 2021, https://www. doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/elips/documents/so-3396-signed-2-11-21-final.pdf (accessed March 17, 2021). 70. Ibid. 71. Associated Press, “Ute Indian Tribe Criticizes Biden’s Camp Hale Monument Designation,” KUER 90.1, October 13, 2022. 72. William Perry Pendley, “Trump Wants to Free Up Federal Lands, His Interior Secretary Fails Him,” National Review Online, September 25, 2017, https://www.nationalreview.com/2017/09/secretary-interior-ryan-zinke- monuments-review-trump-executive-order-antiquities-act-environmentalists/ (accessed March 16, 2023). 73. The Oregon and California Revested Lands Sustained Yield Management Act of 1937, Public Law 75-405, 43 U.S. Code § 2601. 74. Ibid., and American Forest Resource Council v. Hammond, 422 F. Supp. 3d 184, 187 (D.D.C. 2019). 75. American Forest Resource Council v. Hammond, 422 F. Supp. 3d, pp. 187–188. 76. Federal Register, Vol. 55, No. 26 (June 26, 1990), p. 26114–26194. 77. Federal Register, Vol. 65, No. 114 (June 13, 2000), pp. 37249–37252. 78. Federal Register, Vol. 82, No. 11 (January 18, 2017), pp. 6145–6150. 79. American Forest Resource Council v. Hammond, 422 F. Supp. 3d 184 (D.D.C. 2019). 80. U.S. Department of the Interior, “Final Consent Decrees/Settlement Agreements,” https://www.doi.gov/ solicitor/transparency/final (accessed March 16, 2023). 81. Michael Doyle, “Interior Order Erases Litigation Website,” E&E News, June 17, 2022, https://www.eenews.net/ articles/interior-order-erases-litigation-website/ (accessed March 16, 2023). 82. Rob Roy Ramey, On the Origin of Specious Species (Lexington Books 2012), pp. 77–97. 83. William Perry Pendley, “Killing Jobs to Save the Sage Grouse: Junk Science, Weird Science, and Plain Nonsense,” Washington Times, May 31, 2012, https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/may/31/killing- jobs-to-save-the-sage-grouse/ (accessed March 16, 2023). 84. Michael Lee, “Wyoming’s Push to Delist Grizzly Bears from Endangered Species List Faces Opposition from Anti-Hunting Group,” Fox News, January 21, 2022, https://www.foxnews.com/politics/wyoming-delist-grizzly- endangered-species-list-opposition-anti-hunting-group (accessed March 18, 2023). 85. News release, “Trump Administration Returns Management and Protection of Gray Wolves to States and Tribes Following Successful Recovery Efforts,” October 29, 2020, https://www.doi.gov/pressreleases/trump- administration-returns-management-and-protection-gray-wolves-states-and-tribes (accessed March 18, 2023). 86. 50 Code of Federal Regulations §17, and Sean Paige, “‘Rewilding’ Will Backfire on Colorado,” The Gazette, June 19, 2022, https://gazette.com/opinion/guest-column-rewilding-will-backfire-on-colorado/article_ d0016672-ed79-11ec-b027-abe62ba840a1.html (accessed March 18, 2023). 87. Madeleine C. Bottrill et al., “Is Conservation Triage Just Smart Decision Making?” Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Vol. 23, No. 12 (December 2008), pp. 649–654, https://karkgroup.org/wp-content/uploads/Bottrill-et-al-2008. pdf (accessed March 16, 2023). 88. Rob Roy Ramey II, testimony before the Committee on Resources, U.S. House of Representatives, April 8, 2014, https://naturalresources.house.gov/uploadedfiles/rameytestimony4_8.pdf (accessed March 16, 2023). 89. Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977, Public Law 95–87. 90. Pennsylvania is the nation’s third-largest coal producer, and its state program was the model for SMCRA. 91. Federal Register, Vol. 85, No. 207 (October 26, 2020), pp. 67631–67635. 92. U.S. Department of the Interior, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, “Approximate Original Contour,” INE–26, June 23, 2020, https://www.osmre.gov/sites/default/files/pdfs/directive1003.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 93. Tim Gallaudet and Timothy R. Petty, “Federal Action Plan for Improving Forecasts of Water Availability,” National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, October 2019, https://www.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/ legacy/document/2019/Oct/Federal%20Action%20Plan%20for%20Improving%20Forecasts%20of%20 Water%20Availability.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). — 544 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 94. 32 U.S. Code, ch. 52. 95. Donald J. Trump, “Presidential Memorandum on Promoting the Reliable Supply and Delivery of Water in the West,” October 19, 2018, https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/presidential- memorandum-promoting-reliable-supply-delivery-water-west/ (accessed March 17, 2023). 96. U.S. Department of the Interior, “Land Buy-Back Program for Tribal Nations,” https://www.doi.gov/ buybackprogram (accessed March 18, 2023). 97. Great American Outdoors Act, Public Law 116–152.

Introduction

Low 43.5%
Pages: 46-48

— 14 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise around the world. Still others find themselves happiest in their local voluntary communities of friends, their neighbors, their civic or charitable work. The American Republic was founded on principles prioritizing and maximizing individuals’ rights to live their best life or to enjoy what the Framers called “the Blessings of Liberty.” It’s this radical equality—liberty for all—not just of rights but of authority—that the rich and powerful have hated about democracy in America since 1776. They resent Americans’ audacity in insisting that we don’t need them to tell us how to live. It’s this inalienable right of self-direction—of each person’s opportunity to direct himself or herself, and his or her community, to the good— that the ruling class disdains. With the Declaration and Constitution, our nation’s Founders handed to us the means with which to preserve this right. Abraham Lincoln wrote of the Dec- laration as an “apple of gold” in a silver frame, the Constitution. So must the next conservative President look to these documents when the elites mount their next assault on liberty. Left to our own devices, the American people rejected European monarchy and colonialism just as we rejected slavery, second-class citizenship for women, mercantilism, socialism, Wilsonian globalism, Fascism, Communism, and (today) wokeism. To the Left, these assertions of patriotic self-assurance are just so many signs of our moral depravity and intellectual inferiority—proof that, in fact, we need a ruling elite making decisions for us. But the next conservative President should be proud, not ashamed of Americans’ unique culture of social equality and ordered liberty. After all, the countries where Marxist elites have won political and economic power are all weaker, poorer, and less free for it. The United States remains the most innovative and upwardly mobile society in the world. Government should stop trying to substitute its own preferences for those of the people. And the next conservative President should champion the dynamic genius of free enterprise against the grim miseries of elite-di- rected socialism. The promise of socialism—Communism, Marxism, progressivism, Fascism, whatever name it chooses—is simple: Government control of the economy can ensure equal outcomes for all people. The problem is that it has never done so. There is no such thing as “the government.” There are just people who work for the government and wield its power and who—at almost every opportunity—wield it to serve themselves first and everyone else a distant second. This is not a failing of one nation or socialist party, but inherent in human nature. Nighttime satellite images of the Korean peninsula famously show the free-mar- ket South lit up, with homes, businesses, and cities electrified from coast to coast. By contrast, Communist North Korea is almost completely dark, except for the small dot of the capital city, Pyongyang, where a psychotic dictator and his cronies — 15 — Foreword live. The same phenomenon is on display in the infuriating fact that four of the six richest counties in the United States are suburbs of Washington, D.C.—a city infamous for its lack of native productive industries. We see the same corruption expressed on an individual level whenever billion- aire climate activists, who want to outlaw carbon-fueled transportation, fly to A-list conferences on their private jets. Or when COVID-19 shutdown politicians like former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and California Governor Gavin Newsom were caught at the hair salon or dining at fancy restaurants after moralizing about how everyone else must stay home and forgo such luxuries during the pandemic. For socialists, who are almost always well-to-do, socialism is not a means of equalizing outcomes, but a means of accumulating power. They never get around to helping anyone else. The Soviet empire was a social and economic failure. North Korea, despite the opulence of its tyrants, is one of the poorest nations in the world. Cuba is so corrupt that its people regularly risk their lives to escape to Florida on rafts. Venezuela was once the richest nation in South America; today, a decade after a Marxist dictator took over, 94 percent of Venezuelans live in poverty.4 Even socialist Senator Bernie Sanders’ home state of Vermont was forced to repeal the state’s single-payer health care system just three years after creating it. In every case, socialist elites promised that if only they could direct the econ- omy, everything would be better. Very quickly, everything got worse. In socialist nation after socialist nation, the only way the government could keep its disgrun- tled people in line was to surveil and terrorize them. By contrast, in countries with a high degree of economic freedom, elites are not in charge because everyone is in charge. People work, build, invest, save, and create according to their own interests and in service to the common good of their fellow citizens. There is a reason why the private economy hews to the maxim “the customer is always right” while government bureaucracies are notoriously user-unfriendly, just as there is a reason why private charities are cheerful and government welfare systems are not. It’s not because grocery store clerks and PTA moms are “good” and federal bureaucrats are “bad.” It’s because private enterprises—for-profit or nonprofit—must cooperate, to give, to succeed. So as the American people take back their sovereignty, constitutional authority, respect for their families and communities, they should also take back their right to pursue the good life. The next President should promote pro-growth economic policies that spur new jobs and investment, higher wages, and productivity. Yes, that agenda should include overdue tax and regulatory reform, but it should go further and include antitrust enforcement against corporate monopolies. It should promote educa- tional opportunities outside the woke-dominated system of public schools and

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text. A score of 60% or higher indicates meaningful thematic overlap. This does not imply direct causation or intent, but highlights areas where legislation aligns with Project 2025 policy objectives.