Hershel Woody Williams National Medal of Honor Monument Location Act
Download PDFSponsored by
Rep. Moore, Blake D. [R-UT-1]
ID: M001213
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on National Parks. Hearings held.
December 9, 2025
Introduced
Committee Review
đ Current Status
Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.
Floor Action
Passed House
Senate Review
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
đ How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, brought to you by the same geniuses who thought it was a good idea to put a monument to the "War on Terror" in the middle of the National Mall.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Hershel Woody Williams National Medal of Honor Monument Location Act is a bill that's supposed to honor the Medal of Honor recipients by authorizing a commemorative work on the National Mall. But let's be real, folks, this is just a thinly veiled attempt to pander to veterans' groups and score some cheap patriotic points.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill essentially overrides existing law (40 U.S.C. 8908(c)) to allow the National Medal of Honor Museum Foundation to build their monument within the Reserve, which is a fancy way of saying "right next to the Lincoln Memorial." Because what's more American than building a monument to ourselves right next to Honest Abe?
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are involved here: veterans' groups, politicians looking for photo ops, and the National Medal of Honor Museum Foundation, which is probably just a front for some wealthy donors who want their names on a plaque.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill will have all the impact of a feather landing on a pillow. It's a symbolic gesture that won't actually do anything to help veterans or improve the country. But hey, it'll make for great campaign ads and press releases! The real implication here is that our politicians are more interested in grandstanding than actual governance.
Diagnosis: This bill is suffering from a severe case of "Patriotism-itis," a disease characterized by an excessive desire to appear patriotic without actually doing anything meaningful. Symptoms include empty rhetoric, pointless legislation, and a complete lack of substance. Treatment: a healthy dose of skepticism and a strong stomach for the inevitable disappointment that comes with watching our politicians in action.
Prognosis: This bill will pass with flying colors, because who doesn't love a good patriotic gesture? But don't expect it to actually accomplish anything worthwhile. It's just another example of our government's ability to waste time and resources on meaningless gestures while ignoring the real problems facing this country.
Related Topics
đ° Campaign Finance Network
Rep. Moore, Blake D. [R-UT-1]
Congress 119 ⢠2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
No individual contributions found
Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance
This bill has 8 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
Rep. Veasey, Marc A. [D-TX-33]
ID: V000131
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Webster, Daniel [R-FL-11]
ID: W000806
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Ellzey, Jake [R-TX-6]
ID: E000071
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Miller, Carol D. [R-WV-1]
ID: M001205
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Luna, Anna Paulina [R-FL-13]
ID: L000596
Top Contributors
10
Rep. LaLota, Nick [R-NY-1]
ID: L000598
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Hunt, Wesley [R-TX-38]
ID: H001095
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Carbajal, Salud O. [D-CA-24]
ID: C001112
Top Contributors
10
Donor Network - Rep. Moore, Blake D. [R-UT-1]
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 38 nodes and 45 connections
Total contributions: $146,660
Top Donors - Rep. Moore, Blake D. [R-UT-1]
Showing top 20 donors by contribution amount
Project 2025 Policy Matches
This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document. Higher similarity scores indicate stronger thematic connections.
Introduction
â 543 â Department of the Interior 68. Karen Budd Falen, âBidenâs â30 By 30 Planâ: A Slap at American Private Property Rights,â Cowboy State Daily, April 15, 2021, https://cowboystatedaily.com/2021/04/15/bidens-30-by-30-plan-a-slap-at-american-private- property-rights/ (accessed March 16, 2023). 69. U.S. Department of the Interior, âOrder No. 3396: Rescission of Secretaryâs Order 3388, âLand and Water Conservation Fund Implementation by the U.S. Department of the Interior,ââ February 11, 2021, https://www. doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/elips/documents/so-3396-signed-2-11-21-final.pdf (accessed March 17, 2021). 70. Ibid. 71. Associated Press, âUte Indian Tribe Criticizes Bidenâs Camp Hale Monument Designation,â KUER 90.1, October 13, 2022. 72. William Perry Pendley, âTrump Wants to Free Up Federal Lands, His Interior Secretary Fails Him,â National Review Online, September 25, 2017, https://www.nationalreview.com/2017/09/secretary-interior-ryan-zinke- monuments-review-trump-executive-order-antiquities-act-environmentalists/ (accessed March 16, 2023). 73. The Oregon and California Revested Lands Sustained Yield Management Act of 1937, Public Law 75-405, 43 U.S. Code § 2601. 74. Ibid., and American Forest Resource Council v. Hammond, 422 F. Supp. 3d 184, 187 (D.D.C. 2019). 75. American Forest Resource Council v. Hammond, 422 F. Supp. 3d, pp. 187â188. 76. Federal Register, Vol. 55, No. 26 (June 26, 1990), p. 26114â26194. 77. Federal Register, Vol. 65, No. 114 (June 13, 2000), pp. 37249â37252. 78. Federal Register, Vol. 82, No. 11 (January 18, 2017), pp. 6145â6150. 79. American Forest Resource Council v. Hammond, 422 F. Supp. 3d 184 (D.D.C. 2019). 80. U.S. Department of the Interior, âFinal Consent Decrees/Settlement Agreements,â https://www.doi.gov/ solicitor/transparency/final (accessed March 16, 2023). 81. Michael Doyle, âInterior Order Erases Litigation Website,â E&E News, June 17, 2022, https://www.eenews.net/ articles/interior-order-erases-litigation-website/ (accessed March 16, 2023). 82. Rob Roy Ramey, On the Origin of Specious Species (Lexington Books 2012), pp. 77â97. 83. William Perry Pendley, âKilling Jobs to Save the Sage Grouse: Junk Science, Weird Science, and Plain Nonsense,â Washington Times, May 31, 2012, https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/may/31/killing- jobs-to-save-the-sage-grouse/ (accessed March 16, 2023). 84. Michael Lee, âWyomingâs Push to Delist Grizzly Bears from Endangered Species List Faces Opposition from Anti-Hunting Group,â Fox News, January 21, 2022, https://www.foxnews.com/politics/wyoming-delist-grizzly- endangered-species-list-opposition-anti-hunting-group (accessed March 18, 2023). 85. News release, âTrump Administration Returns Management and Protection of Gray Wolves to States and Tribes Following Successful Recovery Efforts,â October 29, 2020, https://www.doi.gov/pressreleases/trump- administration-returns-management-and-protection-gray-wolves-states-and-tribes (accessed March 18, 2023). 86. 50 Code of Federal Regulations §17, and Sean Paige, ââRewildingâ Will Backfire on Colorado,â The Gazette, June 19, 2022, https://gazette.com/opinion/guest-column-rewilding-will-backfire-on-colorado/article_ d0016672-ed79-11ec-b027-abe62ba840a1.html (accessed March 18, 2023). 87. Madeleine C. Bottrill et al., âIs Conservation Triage Just Smart Decision Making?â Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Vol. 23, No. 12 (December 2008), pp. 649â654, https://karkgroup.org/wp-content/uploads/Bottrill-et-al-2008. pdf (accessed March 16, 2023). 88. Rob Roy Ramey II, testimony before the Committee on Resources, U.S. House of Representatives, April 8, 2014, https://naturalresources.house.gov/uploadedfiles/rameytestimony4_8.pdf (accessed March 16, 2023). 89. Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977, Public Law 95â87. 90. Pennsylvania is the nationâs third-largest coal producer, and its state program was the model for SMCRA. 91. Federal Register, Vol. 85, No. 207 (October 26, 2020), pp. 67631â67635. 92. U.S. Department of the Interior, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, âApproximate Original Contour,â INEâ26, June 23, 2020, https://www.osmre.gov/sites/default/files/pdfs/directive1003.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 93. Tim Gallaudet and Timothy R. Petty, âFederal Action Plan for Improving Forecasts of Water Availability,â National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, October 2019, https://www.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/ legacy/document/2019/Oct/Federal%20Action%20Plan%20for%20Improving%20Forecasts%20of%20 Water%20Availability.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). â 544 â Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 94. 32 U.S. Code, ch. 52. 95. Donald J. Trump, âPresidential Memorandum on Promoting the Reliable Supply and Delivery of Water in the West,â October 19, 2018, https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/presidential- memorandum-promoting-reliable-supply-delivery-water-west/ (accessed March 17, 2023). 96. U.S. Department of the Interior, âLand Buy-Back Program for Tribal Nations,â https://www.doi.gov/ buybackprogram (accessed March 18, 2023). 97. Great American Outdoors Act, Public Law 116â152.
Introduction
â 14 â Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise around the world. Still others find themselves happiest in their local voluntary communities of friends, their neighbors, their civic or charitable work. The American Republic was founded on principles prioritizing and maximizing individualsâ rights to live their best life or to enjoy what the Framers called âthe Blessings of Liberty.â Itâs this radical equalityâliberty for allânot just of rights but of authorityâthat the rich and powerful have hated about democracy in America since 1776. They resent Americansâ audacity in insisting that we donât need them to tell us how to live. Itâs this inalienable right of self-directionâof each personâs opportunity to direct himself or herself, and his or her community, to the goodâ that the ruling class disdains. With the Declaration and Constitution, our nationâs Founders handed to us the means with which to preserve this right. Abraham Lincoln wrote of the Dec- laration as an âapple of goldâ in a silver frame, the Constitution. So must the next conservative President look to these documents when the elites mount their next assault on liberty. Left to our own devices, the American people rejected European monarchy and colonialism just as we rejected slavery, second-class citizenship for women, mercantilism, socialism, Wilsonian globalism, Fascism, Communism, and (today) wokeism. To the Left, these assertions of patriotic self-assurance are just so many signs of our moral depravity and intellectual inferiorityâproof that, in fact, we need a ruling elite making decisions for us. But the next conservative President should be proud, not ashamed of Americansâ unique culture of social equality and ordered liberty. After all, the countries where Marxist elites have won political and economic power are all weaker, poorer, and less free for it. The United States remains the most innovative and upwardly mobile society in the world. Government should stop trying to substitute its own preferences for those of the people. And the next conservative President should champion the dynamic genius of free enterprise against the grim miseries of elite-di- rected socialism. The promise of socialismâCommunism, Marxism, progressivism, Fascism, whatever name it choosesâis simple: Government control of the economy can ensure equal outcomes for all people. The problem is that it has never done so. There is no such thing as âthe government.â There are just people who work for the government and wield its power and whoâat almost every opportunityâwield it to serve themselves first and everyone else a distant second. This is not a failing of one nation or socialist party, but inherent in human nature. Nighttime satellite images of the Korean peninsula famously show the free-mar- ket South lit up, with homes, businesses, and cities electrified from coast to coast. By contrast, Communist North Korea is almost completely dark, except for the small dot of the capital city, Pyongyang, where a psychotic dictator and his cronies â 15 â Foreword live. The same phenomenon is on display in the infuriating fact that four of the six richest counties in the United States are suburbs of Washington, D.C.âa city infamous for its lack of native productive industries. We see the same corruption expressed on an individual level whenever billion- aire climate activists, who want to outlaw carbon-fueled transportation, fly to A-list conferences on their private jets. Or when COVID-19 shutdown politicians like former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and California Governor Gavin Newsom were caught at the hair salon or dining at fancy restaurants after moralizing about how everyone else must stay home and forgo such luxuries during the pandemic. For socialists, who are almost always well-to-do, socialism is not a means of equalizing outcomes, but a means of accumulating power. They never get around to helping anyone else. The Soviet empire was a social and economic failure. North Korea, despite the opulence of its tyrants, is one of the poorest nations in the world. Cuba is so corrupt that its people regularly risk their lives to escape to Florida on rafts. Venezuela was once the richest nation in South America; today, a decade after a Marxist dictator took over, 94 percent of Venezuelans live in poverty.4 Even socialist Senator Bernie Sandersâ home state of Vermont was forced to repeal the stateâs single-payer health care system just three years after creating it. In every case, socialist elites promised that if only they could direct the econ- omy, everything would be better. Very quickly, everything got worse. In socialist nation after socialist nation, the only way the government could keep its disgrun- tled people in line was to surveil and terrorize them. By contrast, in countries with a high degree of economic freedom, elites are not in charge because everyone is in charge. People work, build, invest, save, and create according to their own interests and in service to the common good of their fellow citizens. There is a reason why the private economy hews to the maxim âthe customer is always rightâ while government bureaucracies are notoriously user-unfriendly, just as there is a reason why private charities are cheerful and government welfare systems are not. Itâs not because grocery store clerks and PTA moms are âgoodâ and federal bureaucrats are âbad.â Itâs because private enterprisesâfor-profit or nonprofitâmust cooperate, to give, to succeed. So as the American people take back their sovereignty, constitutional authority, respect for their families and communities, they should also take back their right to pursue the good life. The next President should promote pro-growth economic policies that spur new jobs and investment, higher wages, and productivity. Yes, that agenda should include overdue tax and regulatory reform, but it should go further and include antitrust enforcement against corporate monopolies. It should promote educa- tional opportunities outside the woke-dominated system of public schools and
About These Correlations
Policy matches are calculated using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text. A score of 60% or higher indicates meaningful thematic overlap. This does not imply direct causation or intent, but highlights areas where legislation aligns with Project 2025 policy objectives.