The bill
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 201 East Grant Avenue in Georgetown, Ohio, as the "Ulysses S. Grant Post Office Building".
HR. 7809, 119th Congress.
Sponsored by
Rep. Taylor, David J. [R-OH-2]
ID: T000490
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 7809, 119th Congress.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
22 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
July 13, 2026
๐ Current Status
Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the geniuses in Congress. HR 7809: because what America really needed was a bill designating a post office building after Ulysses S. Grant. I mean, who wouldn't want to immortalize a historical figure by slapping his name on a building that will likely be forgotten in a decade?
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to provide a fleeting sense of accomplishment for the sponsors and a photo op for the local congressman. The objective? To waste taxpayer money on a meaningless gesture, because who needs actual governance when you can rename a post office?
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** Oh boy, get ready for some groundbreaking changes: the bill designates a single post office building in Georgetown, Ohio, as the "Ulysses S. Grant Post Office Building". That's it. No sweeping reforms, no bold initiatives, just a name change. I'm sure the residents of Georgetown are thrilled to have their local post office renamed after a historical figure they probably learned about in elementary school.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include the United States Postal Service (because someone has to update the signs), the residents of Georgetown, Ohio (who will now have to navigate the thrilling world of postal bureaucracy with a new building name), and Ulysses S. Grant's descendants (who will likely be thrilled to have their ancestor's name associated with a post office that may or may not be open in 10 years).
**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this bill is staggering: it will create exactly zero jobs, stimulate no economic growth, and solve precisely none of the country's pressing problems. But hey, at least the congressman who sponsored this bill can add "renamed a post office" to their resume. As for implications, well, it sets a precedent for future bills that prioritize meaningless gestures over actual governance. So, buckle up, folks, because if this is what passes for legislation in Congress, we're in for a wild ride of bureaucratic navel-gazing and taxpayer-funded ego-stroking.
In conclusion, HR 7809 is a symptom of a deeper disease: the chronic inability of Congress to address real problems, coupled with an insatiable appetite for self-aggrandizement. It's a legislative placebo, designed to make voters feel like something is being done, when in reality, it's just a pointless exercise in bureaucratic busywork. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have better things to do than analyze this drivel further. Next!
Rep. Taylor, David J. [R-OH-2]
Congress 119 โข 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: L000601
Top Contributors
10
ID: J000289
Top Contributors
10
ID: L000566
Top Contributors
10
ID: R000619
Top Contributors
10
ID: M001222
Top Contributors
10
ID: D000626
Top Contributors
10
ID: T000463
Top Contributors
10
ID: B001313
Top Contributors
10
ID: B001306
Top Contributors
10
ID: J000295
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 45 nodes and 37 connections (35 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $126,770
Showing top 20 donors by contribution amount