The bill
Veteran DATA Act
HR. 7280, 119th Congress β read as touching Private Prisons & Immigration Detention.
Sponsored by
Rep. Budzinski, Nikki [D-IL-13]
ID: B001315
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 7280, 119th Congress β read as touching Private Prisons & Immigration Detention.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
26 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
April 14, 2026
π Current Status
Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. The Veteran DATA Act, a bill so cleverly crafted to make you believe that our esteemed representatives actually care about veterans' privacy. How quaint.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to pretend to protect veterans' sensitive personal information from being sold or misused by contractors. Because, you know, the VA's track record on data security is impeccable (insert sarcasm here). The objectives are twofold: (1) to prohibit the Secretary of Veterans Affairs from entering into contracts that allow contractors to sell or disclose sensitive personal information, and (2) to ensure that contractors don't monetize, sell, or misuse covered information.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends title 38 of the United States Code by adding a new subsection that prohibits the Secretary from entering into contracts that permit the sale of sensitive personal information. It also requires the Secretary to include clauses in contracts that prohibit contractors from monetizing or misusing covered information. Oh, and let's not forget the obligatory report to Congress, because what's a bill without some pointless bureaucratic busywork?
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include veterans (whose data is supposedly being protected), contractors (who will have to pretend to care about data security), and the VA (which will have to go through the motions of implementing these new provisions). Stakeholders include the usual suspects: lobbyists for defense contractors, veterans' organizations, and anyone else who can spin this bill as a victory for their particular interest group.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact is negligible, as this bill is largely symbolic. It's a Band-Aid on a bullet wound, designed to make politicians look good without actually addressing the underlying issues. The implications are clear: more bureaucratic red tape, more opportunities for contractors to find loopholes, and more empty promises to veterans that their data will be protected.
In conclusion, the Veteran DATA Act is a perfect example of legislative placebo effect β it's designed to make you feel better without actually doing anything meaningful. It's a symptom of a deeper disease: the chronic inability of our government to effectively address real problems, instead opting for shallow, PR-friendly solutions that benefit no one except the politicians and special interest groups who crafted them. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have better things to do than watch this farce unfold.
Rep. Budzinski, Nikki [D-IL-13]
Congress 119 β’ 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 2 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: B001321
Top Contributors
10
ID: V000138
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 54 nodes and 32 connections (61 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $96,670
Showing top 21 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 7 harmed.
Section 2 prohibits VA from entering contracts that allow contractors to sell sensitive personal information; private prison contractors often handle VA health data and could be barred from such contracts, imposing a cost.
Section 2's ban on selling sensitive personal information affects contractors like surveillance tech firms (e.g., Palantir, Clearview AI) that may seek VA data for policing or immigration enforcement, imposing a regulatory cost.
Section 2 prohibits VA contractors from selling sensitive personal information; large tech firms (e.g., Google, Amazon) that contract with VA for cloud or data services would be barred from monetizing such data, imposing a cost.
Section 2's prohibition on selling sensitive personal information applies to VA contractors; telecom firms (e.g., AT&T, Verizon) providing services to VA could be restricted from monetizing VA-held data, imposing a cost.
Section 2 bars VA contractors from selling sensitive personal information; health insurers (e.g., UnitedHealth, CVS Health) that contract with VA for claims processing or data analytics would be prohibited from monetizing such data, imposing a cost.
Section 2's ban on selling sensitive personal information affects VA contractors; medical device firms (e.g., Medtronic, Abbott) that handle VA patient data for device monitoring or trials would be barred from monetizing that data, imposing a cost.
+ 1 more industry not shown.
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Budzinski, Nikki [D-IL-13])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022βpresent cycles. Donations are not proof of intent β they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.