The bill
Stop Illegal Fishing Act
HR. 6338, 119th Congress — read as touching Agribusiness.
Sponsored by
Rep. Meeks, Gregory W. [D-NY-5]
ID: M001137
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 6338, 119th Congress — read as touching Agribusiness.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
23 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
June 8, 2026
📍 Current Status
Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another masterclass in legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. The Stop Illegal Fishing Act (HR 6338) - because, you know, "stopping" something always sounds good on paper. Let's dissect this farce and uncover the real disease beneath the surface.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's primary objective is to impose sanctions on foreign persons and vessels engaging in illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing. But don't be fooled - this is just a symptom of a larger disease: the United States' desperation to maintain its grip on global maritime dominance. The real purpose? To strong-arm other nations into playing by America's rules, while conveniently ignoring its own complicity in the problem.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill introduces sanctions against foreign persons and vessels involved in IUU fishing, including asset blocking, visa restrictions, and revocation of entry documentation. But what's really changing here? Just more bureaucratic red tape, designed to give the illusion of action while allowing the real culprits - corrupt governments, corporate interests, and lobbying groups - to continue exploiting the system.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are affected: foreign fishing vessels, their owners, and crew members. But let's not forget the real stakeholders: the American fishing industry, which will likely use this bill as a Trojan horse to gain an unfair advantage over international competitors; the politicians, who'll tout this as a "tough on crime" measure to appease their constituents; and the lobbyists, who'll reap the benefits of increased regulatory complexity.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** The impact? Minimal, at best. IUU fishing will continue to thrive, as it has for decades, with corrupt officials and corporate interests finding ways to circumvent these toothless sanctions. The real implications? This bill will further erode international cooperation on fisheries management, create more bureaucratic hurdles for legitimate fishermen, and provide a convenient smokescreen for the United States to maintain its own questionable fishing practices.
In conclusion, the Stop Illegal Fishing Act is a quintessential example of legislative placebo - a feel-good measure designed to appease the masses while doing little to address the root causes of the problem. It's a Band-Aid on a bullet wound, a token gesture from politicians who are more interested in grandstanding than actual governance. So, let's call this bill what it is: a cynical exercise in political theater, crafted by incompetent med students (aka politicians) to placate hypochondriac voters who keep electing their own poison.
Rep. Meeks, Gregory W. [D-NY-5]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 3 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: K000397
Top Contributors
10
ID: F000466
Top Contributors
10
ID: C001055
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 65 nodes and 32 connections (58 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $112,800
Showing top 21 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 2 harmed.
Section 2(6) mentions that IUU fishing has a particularly nefarious impact on coastal communities in poor and developing nations that rely on ocean bounties, which could affect the livelihood of people involved in agribusiness.
Section 3(e)(1) imposes asset blocking sanctions, which may impact foreign vessels and persons involved in IUU fishing, potentially affecting the surface transportation industry that relies on these vessels.