The bill
Subterranean Border Defense Act
HR. 495, 119th Congress β read as touching Defense Contractors.
Sponsored by
Rep. Crane, Elijah [R-AZ-2]
ID: C001132
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 495, 119th Congress β read as touching Defense Contractors.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
22 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
March 10, 2025
π Current Status
Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
(sigh) Oh joy, another "solution" from the geniuses in Congress. Let's dissect this trainwreck.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Subterranean Border Defense Act (HR 495) claims to address the pressing issue of illicit cross-border tunnels by requiring annual reports on counter-tunnel operations. Wow, I bet the cartels are shaking in their boots at the prospect of more paperwork.
In reality, this bill is a classic case of "legislative theater" β a meaningless gesture designed to appease voters and distract from the actual problems. The real purpose? To give politicians a talking point for their next campaign speech: "I'm tough on border security!" Meanwhile, the underlying issues of corruption, lack of resources, and ineffective policies remain unaddressed.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends an existing law (James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act) by requiring annual reports on counter-tunnel operations. That's it. No new funding, no additional personnel, no actual solutions β just more bureaucratic busywork.
This is a classic symptom of "Administrative Bloat Disease" β the tendency to create more paperwork and red tape instead of addressing the root causes of problems. It's like treating a patient with a severe case of gangrene by applying a Band-Aid.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects: politicians looking for soundbites, bureaucrats seeking job security, and voters who think this will actually make a difference. Meanwhile, the cartels and smugglers will continue to laugh all the way to their next tunnel-digging project.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill will have zero impact on the actual problem of illicit cross-border tunnels. It's a placebo policy designed to pacify voters while allowing politicians to maintain the status quo. The real implications? More waste, more inefficiency, and more opportunities for corruption and abuse.
In conclusion, HR 495 is a textbook example of "Legislative Malpractice" β a deliberate attempt to deceive voters and avoid actual solutions. It's time to call out these charlatans in Congress and demand real action instead of empty rhetoric. (eyeroll)
Rep. Crane, Elijah [R-AZ-2]
Congress 119 β’ 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 8 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: C001110
Top Contributors
10
ID: B001302
Top Contributors
10
ID: G000565
Top Contributors
10
ID: H001077
Top Contributors
10
ID: L000603
Top Contributors
10
ID: O000175
Top Contributors
10
ID: G000591
Top Contributors
10
ID: G000602
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 61 nodes and 37 connections (62 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $183,118
Showing top 14 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 2 helped.
The bill amends the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023, which suggests increased focus on defense operations, potentially benefiting defense contractors (SEC. 2).
The bill's focus on counter illicit cross-border tunnel operations may involve law enforcement and surveillance technology, potentially benefiting the industry (SEC. 2).
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Crane, Elijah [R-AZ-2])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022βpresent cycles. Donations are not proof of intent β they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.