The bill
FIT Procurement Act
HR. 4123, 119th Congress β read as touching Big Tech Platforms.
Sponsored by
Rep. Burlison, Eric [R-MO-7]
ID: B001316
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 4123, 119th Congress β read as touching Big Tech Platforms.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
21 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
July 20, 2026
π Current Status
Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another brilliant example of congressional incompetence, masquerading as a legitimate attempt at reform. The FIT Procurement Act, or HR 4123, is a masterclass in bureaucratic doublespeak and obfuscation.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The stated goal of this bill is to "improve Federal technology procurement." How quaint. In reality, it's just another exercise in CYA (Cover Your A**) for the acquisition workforce, who are apparently too inept to navigate the complexities of modern technology without extensive hand-holding.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill proposes a series of "reforms" that amount to little more than rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic. It establishes a pilot program for experiential learning (because, clearly, these bureaucrats need more on-the-job training), and creates a new training program for acquisition workforce members to learn about information and communications technology (ICT) acquisition. Wow, what a bold move. The bill also includes provisions for "cross-functional" teams and "experiential learning opportunities," because who doesn't love a good buzzword?
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are involved: the acquisition workforce, executive agencies, small businesses, and (of course) the lobbying firms that will inevitably benefit from this bill's vague language and loopholes. It's a veritable Who's Who of incompetence and self-interest.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill has all the potential to achieve what most congressional efforts do: nothing. It will likely result in more bureaucratic red tape, increased costs, and further entrenchment of the status quo. The only real winners will be the consultants and contractors who will feast on the taxpayer-funded gravy train created by this legislation.
In medical terms, this bill is akin to treating a patient's symptoms without addressing the underlying disease. It's a Band-Aid on a bullet wound, a placebo for the terminally stupid. The real illness here is the corrupting influence of special interests and the inability of our elected officials to make meaningful reforms. But hey, at least they're trying... or pretending to, anyway.
Diagnosis: Congressional Incompetence Syndrome (CIS), with symptoms including bureaucratic obfuscation, self-serving grandstanding, and a complete lack of accountability. Prognosis: poor. Treatment: a healthy dose of skepticism, a strong stomach, and a willingness to call out the nonsense for what it is.
Rep. Burlison, Eric [R-MO-7]
Congress 119 β’ 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 3 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: S001230
Top Contributors
10
ID: L000596
Top Contributors
0
No contribution data available
ID: L000562
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 53 nodes and 27 connections (49 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $78,400
Showing top 19 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 6 helped.
Section 4(c) allows advances for ICT subscriptions and tenancy, including cloud environments, which benefits big tech platforms providing cloud services (e.g., AWS, Azure, Google Cloud).
Section 3(b)(1)(B) includes AI and AI-enabled applications in ICT acquisition training, and Section 4(c) permits advances for cloud subscriptions, aiding AI/cloud infrastructure providers.
Section 3(b)(1)(B) includes cybersecurity solutions in ICT acquisition training, increasing demand for cybersecurity products/services.
Section 3(b)(1)(C) encourages use of commercial off-the-shelf technologies, which includes semiconductors and hardware, boosting demand for chipmakers and hardware vendors.
Section 5 increases simplified acquisition and micro-purchase thresholds, making it easier for PE-backed firms and hedge fund portfolio companies to compete for federal contracts.
Section 4(c) allows advances for commercially available content, which could include e-commerce platforms and retail tech services.
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Burlison, Eric [R-MO-7])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022βpresent cycles. Donations are not proof of intent β they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.