The bill
Local Communities & Bird Habitat Stewardship Act of 2025
HR. 3276, 119th Congress — read as touching Agribusiness.
Sponsored by
Rep. Dingell, Debbie [D-MI-6]
ID: D000624
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 3276, 119th Congress — read as touching Agribusiness.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
23 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by Unanimous Consent.
June 9, 2026
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another bill, another exercise in futility. Let's dissect this mess.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Local Communities & Bird Habitat Stewardship Act of 2025 (HR 3276) claims to establish the Urban Bird Treaty Program to conserve birds and their habitats in urban areas. The program aims to protect, restore, or enhance urban bird habitats, reduce hazards, engage communities in scientific activities, and educate them about bird conservation.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill creates a new program within the Department of the Interior, which will provide technical and financial assistance to covered entities (government agencies, NGOs, community groups, and academic institutions) for projects related to urban bird conservation. The program includes a competitive grant process, administered by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are involved:
* Birdwatchers and enthusiasts (96 million Americans, allegedly) * Local businesses and communities that benefit from bird-related tourism * Government agencies, NGOs, and academic institutions seeking funding for conservation projects * The Department of the Interior, which will oversee the program
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a classic case of "greenwashing" – a feel-good measure with little substance. It's a Band-Aid on a bullet wound, attempting to address the symptoms rather than the root causes of bird population decline.
The real motivations behind this bill are likely:
* Pork-barrel politics: securing funding for pet projects and constituents * Environmental virtue signaling: politicians trying to appear eco-friendly without making meaningful changes * Lobbying influence: special interest groups pushing for favorable treatment
Don't be fooled by the noble-sounding objectives. This bill is a thinly veiled attempt to funnel money to favored groups and bolster the egos of lawmakers. The actual impact on bird conservation will be negligible.
In medical terms, this bill is akin to prescribing a placebo to a patient with a terminal illness. It might make everyone feel better for a moment, but it won't address the underlying disease. In this case, the disease is humanity's destructive relationship with the environment, and this bill is just a distraction from the real issues.
Now, if you'll excuse me, I have more important things to attend to – like diagnosing the next case of legislative lunacy.
Rep. Dingell, Debbie [D-MI-6]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: C001118
Top Contributors
10
ID: L000397
Top Contributors
10
ID: E000301
Top Contributors
10
ID: F000466
Top Contributors
10
ID: T000481
Top Contributors
10
ID: H001081
Top Contributors
10
ID: H001103
Top Contributors
0
No contribution data available
ID: S000168
Top Contributors
10
ID: T000468
Top Contributors
10
ID: G000587
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 63 nodes and 38 connections (51 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $112,900
Showing top 21 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 4 helped.
Section 2(a)(1) mentions that policies to reverse bird declines carry benefits such as healthier working lands, which could positively impact agribusiness.
Section 2(b)(2)(A)(i) mentions the restoration of native plant species and control of invasive species, which could lead to increased demand for construction and engineering services in urban areas.
Section 2(b)(2)(A)(i) mentions the restoration of urban habitats, which could increase property values and benefit the real estate industry.
Section 2(a)(2) states that birdwatching generates $279,000,000,000 in annual economic output, which could benefit big-box retail through increased sales of birding-related equipment and supplies.