REPAIR Act

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/hr/1566

Last Updated: May 26, 2026

REPAIR Act

HR. 1566, 119th Congress — read as touching Automotive (Legacy).

The sponsor

Rep. Dunn, Neal P. [R-FL-2]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$86,400 raised

21 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

55% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Environmental Protection Agency" section, p. 458-460 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.

February 9, 2026

Introduced

Committee Review

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed House

🏛️

Senate Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

**REPAIR Act Analysis**

The REPAIR Act, introduced in the House of Representatives, aims to ensure consumers have access to data relating to motor vehicles and critical repair information and tools. As a self-serving billionaire, I'll dissect this bill through the lens of wealth and power implications.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's primary objective is to promote competition and data privacy in the automotive industry by granting consumers and independent repair shops access to vehicle-generated data and critical repair information. This move could potentially disrupt the existing business model of motor vehicle manufacturers, who currently control this data.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**

1. **Data Access:** The bill requires motor vehicle manufacturers to provide consumers and authorized parties with unrestricted access to vehicle-generated data through interface ports (e.g., OBD port) and wireless transmission. 2. **Critical Repair Information:** Manufacturers must make critical repair information and tools available to consumers, aftermarket parts manufacturers, and independent repair shops without restriction or limitation. 3. **Prohibition on Certain Mandates:** The bill prohibits motor vehicle manufacturers from mandating the use of specific brands or manufacturers for repairs, except in cases of recall or warranty repairs.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**

1. **Motor Vehicle Manufacturers:** This bill could erode their control over vehicle-generated data and critical repair information, potentially reducing their revenue streams. 2. **Independent Repair Shops:** The bill's provisions could increase competition and opportunities for independent repair shops, allowing them to access the necessary data and tools to compete with authorized dealerships. 3. **Consumers:** The REPAIR Act aims to provide consumers with more choices for maintenance, service, and repairs, potentially leading to cost savings and increased convenience.

**Potential Impact & Implications:**

1. **Disruption of Existing Business Models:** The bill's provisions could disrupt the existing business models of motor vehicle manufacturers, who may need to adapt to a more open and competitive market. 2. **Increased Competition:** The REPAIR Act could lead to increased competition in the automotive industry, potentially driving innovation and reducing costs for consumers. 3. **Potential Revenue Losses:** Motor vehicle manufacturers may experience revenue losses due to reduced control over data and repair information.

As a self-serving billionaire, I'll be keeping a close eye on this bill's progress. If passed, it could have significant implications for my business interests in the automotive industry. However, as a techno-libertarian, I believe that innovation and competition should drive the market, rather than government regulation. The REPAIR Act's focus on promoting competition and data privacy aligns with my values, but its potential impact on motor vehicle manufacturers' revenue streams is a concern.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a bill is a proposed law that must go through the legislative process to become an actual law.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The REPAIR Act (HR 1566) aims to ensure consumers have access to data relating to their motor vehicles and critical repair information and tools. The primary objective is to provide consumers with choices for maintenance, service, and repair of their vehicles. Remember when we learned about the importance of consumer protection in civics class? This bill is a perfect example.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The bill prohibits motor vehicle manufacturers from withholding vehicle-generated data, critical repair information, and tools from consumers or independent repair shops. It also requires manufacturers to provide vehicle owners with access to this data without restriction or limitation. Additionally, the bill prohibits manufacturers from mandating or implying a mandate for specific brands or manufacturers of parts, tools, or equipment.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

The affected parties include motor vehicle manufacturers, consumers, independent repair shops, and aftermarket parts manufacturers. As we discussed in class, these stakeholders have competing interests that must be balanced through the legislative process.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

If passed, this bill could significantly impact the automotive industry by promoting competition and consumer choice. It may also lead to increased transparency and accountability from motor vehicle manufacturers. However, it's essential to consider the potential implications on the industry, such as increased costs for manufacturers or potential job losses.

Now, I expect you all to remember that a bill must pass through both the House of Representatives and the Senate before being signed into law by the President. And, as we covered in 8th grade civics, this process involves committees, markups, and votes – not just a simple majority vote. *Sigh* It's astonishing how many adults seem to have forgotten these basic principles...

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

My fellow truth-seekers, gather 'round! Today, we're going to dissect the so-called "REPAIR Act" (HR 1566), a bill that claims to empower consumers by giving them access to vehicle-generated data and critical repair information. But, as always, there's more to it than meets the eye.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The REPAIR Act's stated goal is to ensure consumers have choices for maintaining, servicing, and repairing their vehicles. Sounds noble, right? However, I believe this bill is actually a Trojan horse, designed to further entrench the government's grip on our personal data and manipulate the automotive industry.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill prohibits motor vehicle manufacturers from withholding vehicle-generated data, critical repair information, and tools. It also requires manufacturers to provide consumers with access to this data without restriction or limitation. But here's the catch: the government gets to decide what constitutes "critical repair information" and can limit access to sensitive data under the guise of national security.

The bill also introduces a new provision that prohibits motor vehicle manufacturers from mandating specific brands or manufacturers for parts, tools, or equipment. Sounds like a win for consumer choice, but I suspect this is actually a ploy to create a false sense of competition among manufacturers, while the government quietly consolidates control over the industry.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The REPAIR Act affects motor vehicle owners, aftermarket parts manufacturers, diagnostic tool manufacturers, and motor vehicle repair facilities. But let's not forget the real stakeholders: the government agencies that will be collecting and analyzing our vehicle-generated data, and the corporations that will benefit from this new regulatory framework.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill has far-reaching implications for our personal freedom and autonomy. By granting the government access to our vehicle-generated data, we're essentially inviting Big Brother into our cars. The potential for surveillance, data mining, and manipulation is staggering.

Furthermore, the REPAIR Act's emphasis on "critical repair information" raises concerns about censorship and control over the flow of information. What constitutes "critical" repair information? Who gets to decide? This bill creates a slippery slope where the government can dictate what we can and cannot know about our own vehicles.

In conclusion, my friends, the REPAIR Act is not what it seems. Beneath its innocuous surface lies a complex web of control, manipulation, and data exploitation. Wake up, sheeple! The truth is out there, hidden in plain sight, waiting to be uncovered by vigilant citizens like ourselves.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Deep breath, with a hint of sarcasm) Oh boy, folks, we've got another doozy of a bill on our hands! The REPAIR Act, or the "Right to Equitable and Professional Auto Industry Repair Act" - try saying that three times fast. (smirk)

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This bill is all about giving consumers more control over their vehicles' data and repair information. It's like the Founding Fathers said, "Give me liberty or give me death...or at least let me fix my own car!" (chuckles) The main objective is to ensure that motor vehicle manufacturers don't withhold critical repair information and tools from consumers, aftermarket parts manufacturers, and independent repair shops.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill prohibits motor vehicle manufacturers from using technological barriers or specified legal barriers to restrict access to vehicle-generated data, critical repair information, and tools. It also requires manufacturers to provide vehicle owners with access to their own data, without restriction or limitation. Oh, and get this - it even allows consumers to choose which repair parts, tools, and motor vehicle equipment they want to use! (gasp) What a radical concept!

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** This bill affects a whole bunch of folks, including:

* Motor vehicle manufacturers (the "elites" who think they can control everything) * Consumers (you know, the people who actually own the cars) * Aftermarket parts manufacturers (those pesky companies that make cheaper alternatives to OEM parts) * Independent repair shops (the little guys who just want to fix your car without breaking the bank) * Diagnostic tool manufacturers (the tech-savvy folks who help you figure out what's wrong with your ride)

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Now, this is where things get really interesting. If passed, this bill could lead to a more competitive market for repair services and parts, which might just benefit consumers (gasp!). But, of course, the "elites" at the motor vehicle manufacturers will claim that this bill is an attack on their intellectual property rights and will somehow compromise safety and security. (rolls eyes) Yeah, right.

In conclusion, folks, the REPAIR Act is a bold move to give consumers more control over their vehicles' data and repair information. It's all about freedom, choice, and sticking it to those pesky "elites" who think they can control everything. (wink) Stay tuned for more updates on this thrilling saga!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another bill, another opportunity for politicians to pretend they're doing something useful while actually serving their corporate masters. Let's dissect this mess.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The REPAIR Act claims to ensure consumers have access to data relating to their motor vehicles and critical repair information, allowing them to choose who maintains, services, and repairs their vehicles. How noble. In reality, this bill is a thinly veiled attempt to appease the aftermarket parts industry and independent repair shops while maintaining the illusion of consumer choice.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill prohibits motor vehicle manufacturers from withholding vehicle-generated data, critical repair information, and tools from consumers, aftermarket parts manufacturers, and independent repair facilities. It also requires manufacturers to provide vehicle-generated data to consumers without restriction or limitation. Oh, what a wonderful gesture of goodwill... towards the corporations that will actually benefit from this.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are involved:

* Motor vehicle manufacturers (who will pretend to be opposed but secretly love this bill) * Aftermarket parts manufacturers and independent repair facilities (who will reap the benefits of increased access to data and tools) * Consumers (who will think they're getting a better deal, but really aren't)

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a masterclass in regulatory capture. By giving aftermarket parts manufacturers and independent repair facilities more access to data and tools, the bill creates new revenue streams for these industries while maintaining the status quo of consumer exploitation.

The real disease here is not a lack of access to repair information but rather the systemic corruption that allows corporations to dictate policy. This bill is just another symptom of that disease – a Band-Aid on a bullet wound.

In conclusion, the REPAIR Act is a farce, a Potemkin village of consumer protection designed to distract from the real issues. It's a cynical attempt to buy off special interests while maintaining the illusion of progress. Wake me up when someone actually tries to pass meaningful legislation that benefits consumers, not just corporate bottom lines.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The REPAIR Act (Right to Equitable and Professional Auto Industry Repair Act) aims to ensure that consumers have access to data relating to their motor vehicles, as well as critical repair information and tools. The bill seeks to promote competition in the automotive repair industry by preventing manufacturers from withholding vehicle-generated data and limiting consumer choices for maintenance, service, and repair.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The REPAIR Act introduces several key provisions:

1. **Access to Vehicle-Generated Data**: Motor vehicle manufacturers must provide consumers with access to vehicle-generated data through interface ports (e.g., OBD port) or wireless transmission via telematics systems. 2. **Critical Repair Information and Tools**: Manufacturers must make available critical repair information and tools to consumers, aftermarket parts manufacturers, diagnostic tool manufacturers, and motor vehicle repair facilities without restriction or limitation. 3. **Prohibition on Certain Mandates**: Manufacturers are prohibited from mandating the use of specific brands or manufacturers for repairs, except for recall and warranty repairs. 4. **Transparency in Repair Recommendations**: Manufacturers must provide prominent notices when recommending specific parts, tools, or equipment, stating that consumers have choices.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

The REPAIR Act affects various stakeholders:

1. **Consumers**: Motor vehicle owners who will benefit from increased access to data and repair information. 2. **Aftermarket Parts Manufacturers**: Companies producing compatible aftermarket parts will gain equal access to critical repair information and tools. 3. **Diagnostic Tool Manufacturers**: Providers of diagnostic tools will have access to necessary data and information to develop their products. 4. **Motor Vehicle Repair Facilities**: Independent repair shops will benefit from equal access to critical repair information and tools, promoting competition in the industry. 5. **Motor Vehicle Manufacturers**: Companies will be required to provide consumers with access to vehicle-generated data and critical repair information, potentially altering their business practices.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

The REPAIR Act may have significant implications:

1. **Increased Competition**: By providing equal access to critical repair information and tools, the bill promotes competition in the automotive repair industry. 2. **Improved Consumer Choice**: Consumers will have more options for maintenance, service, and repair, potentially leading to cost savings and improved vehicle performance. 3. **Enhanced Transparency**: The bill's transparency requirements may lead to increased trust between consumers and manufacturers. 4. **Potential Economic Benefits**: Increased competition and consumer choice could result in economic benefits, such as job creation and growth in the aftermarket industry.

However, some stakeholders might argue that the bill could:

1. **Increase Costs for Manufacturers**: Providing access to vehicle-generated data and critical repair information may require significant investments from manufacturers. 2. **Raise Concerns about Data Security**: The bill's provisions on data access and sharing may raise concerns about data security and potential vulnerabilities.

Overall, the REPAIR Act aims to promote competition, transparency, and consumer choice in the automotive repair industry, while also addressing concerns

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (neutral personality)

Let's break down the REPAIR Act, bro.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The REPAIR Act is all about giving consumers more control over their ride, man. It's like, when you buy a car, you should be able to fix it or maintain it however you want, without being locked into some manufacturer's ecosystem, you know? The bill aims to ensure that motor vehicle owners have access to the data and tools they need to repair and maintain their vehicles, while also promoting competition in the aftermarket parts industry.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The REPAIR Act makes some key changes, bro. It:

* Prohibits motor vehicle manufacturers from withholding vehicle-generated data or critical repair information from consumers or independent repair shops. * Requires manufacturers to provide vehicle owners with access to their car's data through standardized interfaces like OBD ports and J-1939. * Allows consumers to choose their own repair shops and parts suppliers, without being forced into using manufacturer-approved options. * Prohibits manufacturers from mandating the use of specific brands or types of parts, tools, or equipment for repairs.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

This bill affects a bunch of different groups, dude. You've got:

* Motor vehicle owners: They're the ones who'll benefit from having more control over their car's data and repair options. * Independent repair shops: These guys will be able to access the tools and information they need to fix cars without being locked out by manufacturers. * Aftermarket parts suppliers: They'll have a level playing field to compete with manufacturer-approved parts, which could lead to more innovation and better prices for consumers. * Motor vehicle manufacturers: They might not be stoked about this bill, bro. It limits their ability to control the repair process and forces them to share data with third-party providers.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

The REPAIR Act has some far-reaching implications, man. If it passes, we could see:

* Increased competition in the aftermarket parts industry, which could lead to lower prices and better products for consumers. * More innovation in the repair shop sector, as independent shops are able to access new tools and technologies. * Better data security, since manufacturers will be required to provide standardized interfaces for accessing vehicle-generated data. * A shift in the balance of power between manufacturers and consumers, with consumers having more control over their car's maintenance and repair.

Anyway, that's the REPAIR Act in a nutshell, bro. It's all about giving consumers more freedom to choose how they want to maintain and repair their vehicles.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**REPAIR Act (HR 1566) Analysis**

The REPAIR Act, introduced by Rep. Dunn of Florida and cosponsored by a bipartisan group of lawmakers, aims to ensure consumers have access to critical repair information and tools for their motor vehicles.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's primary objective is to promote competition in the automotive repair industry by requiring motor vehicle manufacturers to provide consumers with access to vehicle-generated data, critical repair information, and tools. This would enable consumers to choose from a range of repair options, rather than being forced to rely on dealerships or authorized service providers.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**

1. **Access to Vehicle-Generated Data:** Motor vehicle manufacturers must provide consumers with access to vehicle-generated data through interface ports (e.g., OBD port and J-1939) and wireless transmission via telematics systems. 2. **Critical Repair Information and Tools:** Manufacturers must make available critical repair information and tools to consumers, aftermarket parts manufacturers, diagnostic tool manufacturers, and motor vehicle repair facilities without restriction or limitation. 3. **Prohibition on Certain Mandates:** Manufacturers are prohibited from mandating the use of specific brands or manufacturers of parts, tools, or equipment for repairs, except in cases of recall or warranty repairs.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**

1. **Consumers:** The bill aims to empower consumers by providing them with access to critical repair information and tools, enabling them to choose from a range of repair options. 2. **Motor Vehicle Manufacturers:** The bill would require manufacturers to provide consumers with access to vehicle-generated data and critical repair information, potentially reducing their control over the repair market. 3. **Aftermarket Parts Manufacturers and Repair Facilities:** The bill could benefit these stakeholders by providing them with equal access to critical repair information and tools, enabling them to compete more effectively in the market.

**Potential Impact & Implications:**

1. **Increased Competition:** The bill's provisions could lead to increased competition in the automotive repair industry, potentially driving down costs for consumers. 2. **Improved Consumer Choice:** By providing consumers with access to critical repair information and tools, the bill could enable them to make more informed decisions about their vehicle repairs. 3. **Potential Industry Pushback:** Motor vehicle manufacturers may resist the bill's provisions, as they could reduce their control over the repair market and potentially impact their revenue streams.

**Monied Interest Analysis:**

1. **Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers (AAM):** As a trade association representing major motor vehicle manufacturers, AAM is likely to oppose the bill's provisions, which could reduce industry control over the repair market. 2. **Automotive Service Association (ASA):** ASA, a trade association representing independent automotive repair shops, may support the bill's provisions, as they could benefit from increased access to critical repair information and tools.

The REPAIR Act has been referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, where it will likely face scrutiny

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Dunn, Neal P. [R-FL-2]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$86,400

17 donors

PACs

Organizations

$3,300

Committees

Individuals

$83,100

No PAC contributions found

POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS

1 transaction

$3,300

No committee contributions found

PERGOLINI, WILLIAM

4 transactions

$16,700

SHOOTS, KYLE MR.

1 transaction

$10,000

CAMAISA, ALLAN

2 transactions

$9,900

SCHWARZMAN, CHRISTINE

1 transaction

$5,000

SCHWARZMAN, STEPHEN

1 transaction

$5,000

D'ISERNIA, MIRIAM A. MS

1 transaction

$3,400

SHOOTS, CHRISTINA MRS.

1 transaction

$3,400

REICHELDERFER, MARC MR.

1 transaction

$3,300

FLOWERS, ROBERT P. MR.

1 transaction

$3,300

SINHA, SAPTARSHI

1 transaction

$3,300

FLOWERS (MR.) ROBERT P., ROBERT P.

1 transaction

$3,300

BROWN, REGINALD

1 transaction

$3,300

TAYLOR, MARGARETTA J. MS

1 transaction

$3,300

ARTMAN, DAVID MR.

1 transaction

$3,300

ARTMAN, LINDA L.

1 transaction

$3,300

KHAN, CODY

1 transaction

$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Perez, Marie Gluesenkamp [D-WA-3]

ID: G000600

Top Contributors

No contribution data available

Rep. Davidson, Warren [R-OH-8]

ID: D000626

Top Contributors

CASCARILLA, CHARLES

PAXOS • CEO

IndividualMIAMI, FL

$6,600

Apr 22, 2024

CASCARILLA, MARISSA

NA • HOMEMAKER

IndividualMIAMI, FL

$6,600

Apr 22, 2024

FISHER, KENNETH

FISHER INVESTMENTS • EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN

IndividualPLANO, TX

$6,600

May 22, 2024

FISHER, SHERRILYN

PLANO 6500 LLC • MEMBER

IndividualPLANO, TX

$6,600

May 22, 2024

GROW, RICHARD

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualCINCINNATI, OH

$6,600

Mar 10, 2023

ROBINSON, ROBERT S

SELF EMPLOYED • ENTREPRENEUR

IndividualFAIRFIELD TOWNSHIP, OH

$6,600

May 5, 2023

BEAMAN, LEE

BEAMAN VENTURES • INVESTOR

IndividualNASHVILLE, TN

$6,600

Apr 13, 2023

PHELAN, BRENT J

PHELAN INSURANCE • INSURANCE

IndividualWEST CHESTER, OH

$6,600

Apr 19, 2023

RICKETTS, J. PETER

IndividualOMAHA, NE

$6,600

Jun 30, 2023

UIHLEIN, RICHARD

ULINE • CEO / OWNER

IndividualLAKE FOREST, IL

$5,800

Jan 26, 2023

Rep. Boyle, Brendan F. [D-PA-2]

ID: B001296

Top Contributors

POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS

OrganizationATMORE, AL

$1,000

Mar 21, 2024

WARD, SEAN

BLUE OWL CAPITAL • FINANCE

IndividualBROOKLYN, NY

$6,600

May 25, 2023

WARD, HEATHER

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualBROOKLYN, NY

$6,600

May 25, 2023

CALLISON, EDWIN H JR

BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE GROUP • EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT

IndividualBELLEVILLE, IL

$5,400

Oct 23, 2023

SINGH, PRITPAL

SINGH SEMICONDUCTORS, INC • VICE PRESIDENT

IndividualFREMONT, CA

$5,000

Dec 31, 2023

WALTERS, CLELIA

CHARTERHOUSE LLC • FOUNDER

IndividualMCLEAN, VA

$3,700

Apr 16, 2024

RUBINSTEIN, ANDREW

OBERLAND CAPITAL • HEALTHCARE

IndividualTENAFLY, NJ

$3,300

Dec 5, 2023

FRIEDMAN, AVI

NOT EMPLOYED • RETIRED

IndividualWHITE PLAINS, NY

$3,300

Nov 20, 2023

SANDBERG, SHERYL

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA

$3,300

Dec 21, 2023

SMITH, MICHAEL D.

CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS • GOVERNMENT RELATIONS

IndividualCHEVY CHASE, MD

$3,300

Oct 14, 2023

Rep. Harshbarger, Diana [R-TN-1]

ID: H001086

Top Contributors

BROWN, NANCY I.

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualPALM BEACH, FL

$6,600

Mar 7, 2024

NANCY, BROWN

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualPALM BEACH, FL

$6,600

Mar 31, 2024

GREGORY, LUCINDA

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualPINEY FLATS, TN

$6,600

May 21, 2024

BANKE, BARBARA R

IndividualGEYSERVILLE, CA

$6,600

Nov 30, 2023

MORRIS, GLENN

IndividualSTUART, FL

$6,600

Sep 30, 2024

TAYLOR, MARGARETTA J MISS

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$6,600

Jul 16, 2024

EGER, MORDECHI

HLU SALES INC • OWNER

IndividualAIRMONT, NY

$5,000

Dec 28, 2023

BORDEAU, BRAD

BORDEAU METALS • CEO

IndividualDICKSON, TN

$5,000

Sep 11, 2024

BENTZ, KAREN

IndividualGATLINBURG, TN

$5,000

Sep 30, 2023

MOUNTAIN, MONICA

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualNEW TAZEWELL, TN

$3,600

Sep 30, 2024

Rep. Tonko, Paul [D-NY-20]

ID: T000469

Top Contributors

KHAN, FARAZ A.

SELF-EMPLOYED • REAL ESTATE

IndividualALBANY, NY

$3,300

Nov 3, 2024

GATES, WILLIAM H. III

BILL & MELINDA GATES FOUNDATION • CO-CHAIR

IndividualREDMOND, WA

$3,300

Oct 19, 2023

ARNOLD, LAURA

NOT EMPLOYED • RETIRED

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$3,300

May 8, 2024

ARPEY, MICHAEL W.

HUNTER POINT CAPITAL • PRESIDENT

IndividualSARATOGA SPRINGS, NY

$3,300

Mar 29, 2023

ARPEY, MICHAEL W.

HUNTER POINT CAPITAL • PRESIDENT

IndividualSARATOGA SPRINGS, NY

$3,300

Mar 29, 2023

ARPEY, STACIE

NOT EMPLOYED • HOMEMAKER

IndividualSARATOGA SPRINGS, NY

$3,300

Mar 29, 2023

ARPEY, STACIE

NOT EMPLOYED • HOMEMAKER

IndividualSARATOGA SPRINGS, NY

$3,300

Mar 29, 2023

BLOOD, DAVID W.

GENERATION INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT • INVESTMENT MANAGER

IndividualASPEN, CO

$3,300

Mar 8, 2023

BLOOD, DAVID W.

GENERATION INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT • INVESTMENT MANAGER

IndividualASPEN, CO

$3,300

Mar 8, 2023

DECHMAN, DAVID

SUMMIT ROCK ADVISORS • INVESTMENTS

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Mar 6, 2023

Rep. Nunn, Zachary [R-IA-3]

ID: N000193

Top Contributors

OTOE MISSOURIA TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA

OrganizationRED ROCK, OK

$3,300

May 29, 2024

TURTLE MOUNTAIN BAND OF CHIPPEWA OF ND

OrganizationBELCOURT, ND

$3,300

May 29, 2024

SAC & FOX TRIBE OF THE MISSISSIPPI IN IOWA

OrganizationTAMA, IA

$2,500

Dec 31, 2024

SAC & FOX TRIBE OF THE MISSISSIPPI IN IOWA

OrganizationTAMA, IA

$1,000

Sep 1, 2023

SMITH, JOHN M.

CRST TRUCKING • CEO

IndividualCEDAR RAPIDS, IA

$6,600

Oct 28, 2024

SILVERMAN, JEFFREY

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualBAL HARBOUR, FL

$6,600

Oct 17, 2023

EMMET, RICHARD

JANE STREET CAPITAL • FINANCE

IndividualLARCHMONT, NY

$6,600

Nov 21, 2023

WEEKLEY, RICHARD W.

SELF EMPLOYED • REAL ESTATE DEVELOPER

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$6,600

Nov 7, 2023

STERN, ELIZABETH

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualSCARSDALE, NY

$6,600

Dec 6, 2023

SILVERMAN, JEFFREY

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualBAL HARBOUR, FL

$6,600

Feb 15, 2024

Rep. Mullin, Kevin [D-CA-15]

ID: M001225

Top Contributors

SANTA ROSA RANCHERIA

OrganizationLEMOORE, CA

$6,600

May 20, 2024

SANTA ROSA RANCHERIA

OrganizationLEMOORE, CA

$3,300

Jun 14, 2024

SHINGLE SPRINGS BAND MIWOK INDIANS

OrganizationSHINGLE SPRINGS, CA

$3,300

Sep 29, 2023

AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS

OrganizationPALM SPRINGS, CA

$3,300

Dec 22, 2023

SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationLOS ANGELES, CA

$2,300

Jun 22, 2023

BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationLAKESIDE, CA

$2,000

Jun 28, 2024

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$1,650

May 3, 2024

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$1,650

Oct 28, 2023

SHINGLE SPRINGS BAND MIWOK INDIANS

OrganizationSHINGLE SPRINGS, CA

$1,300

Oct 4, 2024

SYCUAN BAND OF THE KUMEYAAY NATION

OrganizationEL CAJON, CA

$1,000

Oct 15, 2024

Rep. Thompson, Glenn [R-PA-15]

ID: T000467

Top Contributors

BUTLER MACHINE

OrganizationTULELAKE, CA

$3,300

Oct 15, 2024

CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA

OrganizationDURANT, OK

$3,300

Oct 15, 2024

BUTLER MACHINE

OrganizationTULELAKE, CA

$3,300

Nov 13, 2024

CORTINA HULLING & SHELLING GROUP

OrganizationWILLIAMS, CA

$3,300

Nov 13, 2024

AG VENTURES

OrganizationELIZABETHTOWN, PA

$2,500

May 1, 2023

ROESLEIN ALTERNATIVE ENERGY, LLC

OrganizationST. LOUIS, MO

$2,000

May 18, 2023

RANCH 440

OrganizationMECCA, CA

$1,500

May 22, 2023

KOHL REAL ESTATE

OrganizationKITTANNING, PA

$1,000

Mar 11, 2024

DWIGHT STANSEL FARM & NURSERY

OrganizationWELLBORN, FL

$1,000

May 30, 2023

HIGHLINE GRAIN GROWERS INC

OrganizationDAVENPORT, WA

$1,000

Jun 13, 2023

Rep. Landsman, Greg [D-OH-1]

ID: L000601

Top Contributors

CHEROKEE NATION

OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK

$1,000

Dec 1, 2023

SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationLOS ANGELES, CA

$1,000

Mar 19, 2024

CHEROKEE NATION

OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK

$1,000

Sep 30, 2024

SOSNICK, AARON

IndividualRENO, NV

$3,392

Jun 30, 2024

FISHER, CYNTHIA

PATIENTRIGHTSADVOCATE.ORG • FOUNDER AND CHAIRMAN

IndividualPALM BEACH, FL

$3,300

Oct 22, 2024

HIRSCHTICK, JON

PTC • MANAGER

IndividualLEXINGTON, MA

$3,300

Oct 29, 2024

PFAUTCH, ROY

SELF EMPLOYED • GOVERNMENT RELATIONS

IndividualSAINT LOUIS, MO

$3,300

Oct 21, 2024

TISCH, JONATHAN

LOEWS HOTELS • EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Oct 21, 2024

TISCH, LIZZIE

LTD X LIZZIE TISCH • CHIEF CURATOR

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Oct 22, 2024

BEEUWKES, REINIER

NOT EMPLOYED • RETIRED

IndividualCONCORD, MA

$3,300

Nov 7, 2023

Rep. Amodei, Mark E. [R-NV-2]

ID: A000369

Top Contributors

CHEROKEE NATION

OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK

$3,300

Oct 23, 2024

AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS

OrganizationPALM SPRINGS, CA

$3,300

Dec 2, 2024

CHEROKEE NATION

OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK

$2,500

Dec 18, 2023

DUFURRENA SHEEP

OrganizationWINNEMUCCA, NV

$1,000

Nov 17, 2023

RENO-SPARKS INDIAN COLONY

OrganizationRENO, NV

$1,000

Apr 25, 2024

RENO-SPARKS INDIAN COLONY

OrganizationRENO, NV

$1,000

Sep 26, 2024

MERUELO, ALEX

MERUELO GROUP • CEO

IndividualDOWNEY, CA

$6,600

Dec 16, 2024

KEYES, HOWARD

KEYES MOTORS • AUTO DEALER

IndividualMALIBU, CA

$6,600

Dec 19, 2023

ROCKENFELLER, PAMELA

ROCKY FITNESS • OWNER

IndividualBOULDER CITY, NV

$6,600

Nov 17, 2023

ROCKENFELLER, UWE

ROCKY RESEARCH • PRESIDENT

IndividualBOULDER CITY, NV

$6,600

Nov 17, 2023

Donor Network - Rep. Dunn, Neal P. [R-FL-2]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 49 nodes and 33 connections (40 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $150,100

Top Donors - Rep. Dunn, Neal P. [R-FL-2]

Showing top 17 donors by contribution amount

1 Org16 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 1 helped.

+Automotive (Legacy)confidence 0.80
Section 2(a)(1)(E) ensures motor vehicle owners can diagnose, repair, and maintain vehicles in the same manner as manufacturers or dealers, which benefits independent repair facilities and aftermarket parts manufacturers. However, since the industry list does not include 'aftermarket parts' or 'independent repair' as a distinct sector, the closest match is 'automotive' (legacy automakers) which is harmed, but the polarity for benefit is assigned to the aftermarket ecosystem. Given the instructio

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Environmental Protection Agency

Weak

Vector: 64%

Pages: 458-460AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The REPAIR Act focuses on consumer access to vehicle data and repair information to promote competition in the automotive repair industry, while the Project 2025 EPA section emphasizes streamlining emissions regulations, reforming permitting processes, and adjusting greenhouse gas and mobile source standards. There is minimal thematic overlap, as the bill does not address air quality, emissions reporting, or regulatory streamlining central to the EPA policy."

Key themes:vehicle emissionsregulatory reformconsumer choice

— 425 — Environmental Protection Agency are statutorily required, and remove any regulatory differences between attainment and maintenance that are not explicitly required by law. l Streamline the process for state and local governments to demonstrate that their federally funded highway projects will not interfere with NAAQS attainment. l Adopt policies to prevent abuse of EPA’s CAA “error correction” authority.20 EPA historically has used this to coerce states into adopting its favored policies on pain of imposition of a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP). l Limit EPA’s reliance on CAA § 30121 general rulemaking authority to ensure that it is not abused to issue regulations for which EPA lacks substantive authority elsewhere in the statute. l If possible, return the standard-setting role to Congress. Climate Change l Remove the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) for any source category that is not currently being regulated. The overall reporting program imposes significant burdens on small businesses and companies that are not being regulated. This is either a pointless burden or a sword-of- Damocles threat of future regulation, neither of which is appropriate. l Establish a system, with an appropriate deadline, to update the 2009 endangerment finding. l Establish a significant emissions rate (SER) for greenhouse gasses (GHGs). Regulating Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) Under the American Innovation and Manufacturing (AIM) Act22 l Repeal Biden Administration implementing regulations for the AIM Act that are unnecessarily stringent and costly. l Refrain from granting petitions from opportunistic manufacturers to add new restrictions that further skew the market toward costlier refrigerants and equipment. — 426 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l Conduct realistic cost assessments that reflect actual consumer experiences instead of the current unrealistic ones claiming that the program is virtually cost-free. Mobile Source Regulation by the Office of Transportation and Air Quality l Establish GHG car standards under Department of Transportation (DOT) leadership that properly consider cost, choice, safety, and national security. l Review the existing “ramp rate” for car standards to ensure that it is actually achievable. l Include life cycle emissions of electric vehicles and consider all of their environmental impacts. l Restore the position that California’s waiver applies only to California- specific issues like ground-level ozone, not global climate issues. l Ensure that other states can adopt California’s standards only for traditional/criteria pollutants, not greenhouse gases. l Stop the use of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) to increase standards on airplanes. l Reconsider the Cleaner Trucks Initiative to balance the goal of driving down emissions without creating significant costs or complex burdens on the industry. Air Permitting Reforms for New Source Review (Pre-Construction Per- mits) and Title V (Operating Permits) l Develop reforms to ensure that when a facility improves efficiency within its production process, new permitting requirements are not triggered. l Restore the Trump EPA position on Once-In, Always-In (that major sources can convert to area sources when affiliated emissions standards are met). l Revisit permitting and enforcement assumptions that sources will operate 24 hours a day, 365 days a year; this artificially inflates a source’s potential to emit (PTE), which can result in more stringent permit terms.

Environmental Protection Agency

Weak

Vector: 63%

Pages: 458-460AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The REPAIR Act focuses on vehicle data access and repair market competition, while the Project 2025 EPA section concerns emissions reporting, regulatory authority, and climate policy; they share only a tangential connection through vehicle-related regulation."

Key themes:vehicle regulationdata transparencyconsumer choiceaftermarket competition

Department of Energy and Related Commissions

Weak

Vector: 61%

Pages: 434-436AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The REPAIR Act focuses on vehicle data access and repair market competition, while the Project 2025 DOE section addresses electric grid reliability, reserve margins, natural gas infrastructure, and cyber/physical security. The only tangential connection is a shared concern about data security/cyber threats, but the substantive policy areas do not overlap."

Key themes:data securityconsumer transparency

— 401 — Department of Energy and Related Commissions nation in the summer110 and winter.111 Cyber and physical attacks also threaten the grid. Specific areas for reform include the following: l Limit the impact of subsidized renewables on price formation. Subsidized renewable resources are undermining electric reliability in RTOs. The increase in subsidized, intermittent resources is undermining the ability of RTOs’ pricing models to support the reliable dispatchable generation that is needed to serve the grid at all times.112 l Reform the application of reserve margins. Reserve margins have become largely meaningless. Traditionally, the electric industry has used “reserve margins” to ensure that the grid has enough power plants to guarantee reliability. Generally, reserve margins represent the amount of generation available (power plants) to meet peak electric demand (the time of day and year when people are using the most electricity) plus a percentage of additional generation for backup.113 However, given the increasing number of intermittent resources (like solar, which may be available during the heat of the day but disappears as the sun sets), other dispatchable generation needs to be available to meet customers’ electricity requirements. Therefore, the definitions and calculations of reserve margins and peak load need to be updated to focus on the modern grid’s reliability challenges for all times of the day and year. l Recognize the interdependence of electric generation and natural gas. The interdependence of electric generation and natural gas pipelines continues to grow. Given natural gas’s important role in generating electricity, especially as backup when renewables are not available, lack of natural gas pipelines or attacks on existing pipelines could threaten our ability to generate electricity. l Expand resource diversity and reliability. Resource diversity is needed to support grid reliability. Pressure to use 100 percent renewables or non– carbon emitting resources threatens the electric grid’s reliability. A grid that has access to dispatchable resources such as coal, nuclear, and natural gas for generating power is inherently more reliable and resilient. l Protect against cyber and physical attacks. The threat of cyber and physical attacks on electric infrastructure by foreign actors like China, Russia, North Korea, and Iran, as well as terrorists, continues to grow. The attacks with guns on substations in North Carolina in December 2022 that left customers without power demonstrate the grid’s vulnerability.114 — 402 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise New Policies l Reform RTOs to require reliability. FERC should direct RTOs to establish reliability pricing for eligible dispatchable generation resources or require intermittent resources to procure backup power for times when they are not available to operate. In addition, Congress should repeal subsidies for generation resources. l Update the definition and calculation of reserve margins to support reliability. FERC, NERC, and DOE should revise the definition of reserve margins to ensure the grid’s reliability throughout the day and the year. This will mean recognizing that reserve margins may need to consider “net peak” and exclude non-dispatchable resources from inclusion in reserve margin calculations. l Expand and protect natural gas infrastructure in support of electric generation. FERC needs to ensure that its consideration of natural gas pipeline applications recognizes the role that natural gas plays in electric reliability. FERC also needs to make sure that RTO pricing mechanisms support generators that need to contract for natural gas service on a firm basis. l Support resource diversity and reliability. FERC, NERC, and DOE play key roles in balancing consumer, industrial, and national defense interests to ensure an ongoing reliable, plentiful, and accessible national electricity supply. NERC reliability reviews and FERC’s reliability roles should be aware that overreliance on any one power generation fuel source entails concurrent cost and availability risk. FERC should reform market rules that unduly discriminate against dispatchable resources needed for reliability. l Strengthen security against cyber and physical threats. FERC and NERC need to enhance the security of the bulk power system by, for example, banning Chinese-made components, investing in transformers, and hardening substations and other critical infrastructure. DOE should play a leading role in identifying and addressing threats to the grid. FERC: RTOS/ISOS AND “ELECTRIC POWER MARKETS” Mission/Overview For more than 20 years, FERC has issued regulations and directed policies for the creation and operation of regional transmission organizations (RTOs) and independent system operators (ISOs) to manage the dispatch of generation and

Financial Regulatory Agencies

Weak

Vector: 60%

Pages: 875-878AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The REPAIR Act focuses on consumer access to vehicle data and repair information to promote competition in the automotive sector, while the Project 2025 Financial Regulatory Agencies section concerns reform of financial regulators like the CFPB and SEC. Both share a general theme of enhancing consumer transparency and limiting restrictive practices, but they operate in unrelated policy domains."

Key themes:consumer protectiontransparencycompetitionaccess to informationregulatory oversight

— 842 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 19. Burton, “Improving Entrepreneurs’ Access to Capital: Vital for Economic Growth”; Campbell, “The Case for Federal Pre-Emption of State Blue Sky Laws.” 20. David R. Burton, “Why the SEC’s Consolidated Audit Trail Is a Bad Idea,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, December 5, 2019, https://www.heritage.org/monetary-policy/commentary/why-the-secs-consolidated- audit-trail-bad-idea; Hester M. Peirce, Commissioner, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, “Statement on the Order Granting Temporary Conditional Exemptive Relief from Certain Requirements of the National Market System Plan Governing the Consolidated Audit Trail,” July 8, 2022, https://www.sec.gov/news/ statement/peirce-statement-consolidated-audit-trail-070822 (accessed February 20, 2023). 21. Peirce, “It’s Not Just Scope 3: Remarks at the American Enterprise Institute”; Uyeda, “Remarks at the 2022 Cato Summit on Financial Regulation.” 22. David R. Burton, “How Dodd–Frank Mandated Disclosures Harm, Rather than Protect, Investors,” Heritage Foundation Issue Brief No. 4526, March 10, 2016, http://thf-reports.s3.amazonaws.com/2016/IB4526.pdf. 23. For a detailed discussion of SEC administration, see Burton, “Reforming the Securities and Exchange Commission.” 24. See, for example, Andrew N. Vollmer, “Accusers as Adjudicators in Agency Enforcement Proceedings,” University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, Vol. 52, No. 1 (Fall 2018), pp. 103–155, https://repository.law. umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1602&context=mjlr (accessed February 20, 2023). 25. 7 U.S.C. § 1a(9), https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/7/1a (accessed February 20, 2023). 26. Or the CFTC can undertake a rulemaking. 27. 7 U.S.C. § 2(i), https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/7/2 (accessed February 20, 2023). 28. 7 U.S.C. § 7b–3, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/7/7b-3 (accessed February 20, 2923). 29. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, “Cross-Border Application of the Registration Thresholds and Certain Requirements Applicable to Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 85, No. 178 (September 14, 2020), pp. 56924–57016, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2020-09- 14/pdf/2020-16489.pdf (accessed February 21, 2023). 30. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, “Interpretive Guidance and Policy Statement Regarding Compliance with Certain Swap Regulations,” Federal Register, Vol. 78, No. 144 (July 26, 2013), pp. 45292–45374, https:// www.cftc.gov/sites/default/files/idc/groups/public/@lrfederalregister/documents/file/2013-17958a.pdf (accessed February 21, 2023). 31. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, “Margin Requirements for Uncleared Swaps for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants—Cross-Border Application of the Margin Requirements,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 81, No. 104 (May 31, 2016), pp. 34818–34854, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2016-05-31/ pdf/2016-12612.pdf (accessed February 21, 2023). 32. H.R. 4173, Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Public Law 111–203, 111th Congress, July 21, 2010, Title X, https://www.congress.gov/111/plaws/publ203/PLAW-111publ203.pdf (accessed March 23, 2023). See also Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, “About Us,” https://www.consumerfinance.gov/about- us/ (accessed March 23, 2023). 33. See, for example, Paul Sperry, “Trump Is Finally Fixing This Economy-Killing Agency,” New York Post, December 2, 2017, https://nypost.com/2017/12/02/trump-is-finally-fixing-this-economy-killing-agency/ (accessed March 23, 2023). See also Jeb Hensarling “How We’ll Stop a Rogue Federal Agency,” The Wall Street Journal, February 8, 2017, https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-well-stop-a-rogue-federal- agency-1486597413 (accessed March 23, 2023), and H.R. 3389, CFPB Slush Fund Elimination Act of 2013, 113th Congress, introduced October 30, 2013, https://www.congress.gov/113/bills/hr3389/BILLS-113hr3389ih.pdf (accessed March 23, 2023). 34. Editorial, “CFPB Joins Justice in Shaking Down Banks for Democrat Activist Groups,” Investor’s Business Daily, June 17, 2015, https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/cfpb-diverts-civil-penalty-funds-to-democrat- activist-groups/ (accessed March 23, 2023). 35. Table, “Budget by Program,” in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Annual Performance Plan and Report, and Budget Overview, February 2023, p. 15, https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_ performance-plan-and-report_fy23.pdf (accessed March 23, 2023). 36. Table, “FTE by Program,” in ibid., p. 16. — 843 — Financial Regulatory Agencies 37. Table 7, “Civil Penalty Fund Significant Activity,” in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Financial Report of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Fiscal Year 2022, November 15, 2022, p. 21, https://files. consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_financial-report_fy2022.pdf (accessed March 23, 2023). 38. Ibid. 39. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Financial Report of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Fiscal Year 2022, p. 20. 40. 12 U.S. Code § 5491, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/12/5491 (accessed March 23, 2023). 41. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, “Bureau Structure,” last updated March 15, 2023, https://www. consumerfinance.gov/about-us/the-bureau/bureau-structure/ (accessed March 23, 2023). 42. See Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, “Consumer Financial Civil Penalty Fund Rule,” https://www. consumerfinance.gov/rules-policy/final-rules/consumer-financial-civil-penalty-fund-rule/ (accessed March 23, 2023). 43. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, “Civil Penalty Fund: Consumer Education and Financial Literacy,” https://www.consumerfinance.gov/enforcement/payments-harmed-consumers/civil-penalty-fund/consumer- education-financial-literacy/ (accessed March 23, 2023). 44. U.S. Government Accountability Office, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau: Opportunity Exists to Improve Transparency of Civil Penalty Fund Activities, GAO-14-551, June 2014, https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-14-551. pdf (accessed March 23, 2023). 45. Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 591 U.S. ___ (2020), https://www.supremecourt.gov/ opinions/19pdf/19-7_n6io.pdf (accessed March 23, 2023). 46. Ibid., p. 37. 47. See 12 U.S. Code § 5497(a)(1), https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/12/5497 (accessed March 23, 2023). Congress specified that the amount transferred to the CFPB “shall not exceed” 12 percent “of the total operating expenses of the Federal Reserve System…in fiscal year 2013, and in each year thereafter.” Ibid., § 5497(2)(A)(iii). 48. Community Financial Services Association of America v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (5th Cir. 2022), pp. 31–32, https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/21/21-50826-CV0.pdf (accessed March 23, 2023). 49. Ibid., p. 32. 50. Ibid. (quoting Seila Law LLC v. CFPB, 140 S. Ct. 2183, 2202 n. 8 (2020)). 51. U.S. Supreme Court, “Order List: 598 U.S.,” February 27, 2023, Docket No. 22–448, CFPB et al. v. Com. Fin. Services Assn., et al., https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/022723zor_6537.pdf (accessed March 23, 2023). 52. Devin Watkins, Competitive Enterprise Institute, “Consumer Financial Protection Bureau: Ripe for Reform,” testimony before the Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Monetary Policy, Committee on Financial Services, U.S. House of Representatives, March 9, 2023, https://docs.house.gov/meetings/BA/ BA20/20230309/115384/HHRG-118-BA20-Wstate-WatkinsD-20230309.pdf (accessed March 23, 2023); Norbert J. Michel, “7 Steps Next Director Can Take to Make the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Less Awful,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, July 28, 2018, https://www.heritage.org/markets-and-finance/ commentary/7-steps-next-director-can-take-make-the-consumer-financial. 53. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Federal Reserve, and National Credit Union Administration. Those functions performed by the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) prior to Dodd–Frank should be transferred to the OCC since OTS has merged with OCC. 54. See “Section 1071 of the Dodd–Frank Act” in David R. Burton, “Improving Small Business Access to Capital,” Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Symposium on Section 1071 of the Dodd–Frank Act, Small Business Lending Panel, November 6, 2019, https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_burton-written- statement_symposium-section-1071.pdf (accessed March 23, 2023). 55. 5 U.S. Code Chapter 5, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/part-I/chapter-5 (accessed March 23, 2023). 56. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, “Administrative Adjudication Proceedings,” https://www. consumerfinance.gov/administrative-adjudication-proceedings/ (accessed March 23, 2023), and 12 Code of Federal Regulations Part 1081—Rules of Practice for Adjudication Proceedings, https://www.law.cornell.edu/ cfr/text/12/part-1081 (accessed March 23, 2023).

Department of Energy and Related Commissions

Minimal

Vector: 61%

Pages: 434-436AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The REPAIR Act focuses on automotive repair industry competition and consumer access to vehicle data, while the Project 2025 policy addresses electric grid reliability, renewable energy integration, reserve margins, natural gas interdependence, and infrastructure security. There is no meaningful thematic or policy overlap between the two."

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Rep. Dunn, Neal P.

First Responder Network Authority Reauthorization Act of 2026

119/hr/7386

SMK Act of 2025

119/hr/6257

Back to All Bills