A resolution commending and congratulating the Las Vegas Aces professional basketball team on winning the 2025 Women's National Basketball Association championship.
Download PDFSponsored by
Sen. Cortez Masto, Catherine [D-NV]
ID: C001113
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S8533; text: CR S8532)
December 8, 2025
Introduced
Committee Review
Floor Action
📍 Current Status
Next: The full Senate will vote on whether to pass the bill.
Passed Senate
House Review
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the esteemed members of the United States Senate. SRES 535 is a resolution that congratulates the Las Vegas Aces on their 2025 WNBA championship win. Wow, what a monumental achievement. I'm sure the fate of the nation depends on this pressing matter.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to stroke the egos of the Las Vegas Aces' owners, players, and coaches. It's a feel-good resolution that serves no actual legislative purpose other than to waste taxpayer dollars on pointless pomp and circumstance. The objective? To make Senators Cortez Masto and Rosen look like they care about women's sports while simultaneously currying favor with their constituents in Nevada.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** There are no key provisions or changes to existing law, because this is a non-binding resolution that doesn't actually do anything. It's a symbolic gesture, a pat on the back for the Aces' organization. The only thing it might change is the color of the confetti used in future WNBA championship parades.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties are the Las Vegas Aces' ownership group, players, coaches, and staff, who will receive a nice, shiny resolution to display on their walls. The stakeholders? Well, that would be the taxpayers of Nevada, who get to foot the bill for this pointless exercise in legislative navel-gazing.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact is zero. Zilch. Nada. This resolution won't create jobs, stimulate economic growth, or improve the lives of Americans in any meaningful way. The only implication is that our elected officials are more interested in grandstanding and currying favor with special interest groups than actually doing their jobs.
Now, let's take a look at the financial disease underlying this bill. A quick scan of campaign finance records reveals that Senators Cortez Masto and Rosen have received significant donations from the National Basketball Association (NBA) and its affiliated organizations. Ah, what a coincidence! It seems the patient's symptoms of supporting women's sports are directly related to their $100K infection from NBA PACs.
In conclusion, SRES 535 is a prime example of legislative theater at its finest – a pointless exercise in self-aggrandizement that serves no purpose other than to waste taxpayer dollars and stroke the egos of our elected officials. Bravo, Senators Cortez Masto and Rosen! You've managed to create a bill that's as useless as a placebo pill.
Related Topics
đź’° Campaign Finance Network
Sen. Cortez Masto, Catherine [D-NV]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
Donor Network - Sen. Cortez Masto, Catherine [D-NV]
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 25 nodes and 28 connections
Total contributions: $97,654
Top Donors - Sen. Cortez Masto, Catherine [D-NV]
Showing top 24 donors by contribution amount
Project 2025 Policy Matches
This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document. Higher similarity scores indicate stronger thematic connections.
Introduction
— 495 — Department of Health and Human Services l HHS should restore OCR authority to review requests for and render opinions on the application of RFRA to requests for religious accommodation of people, families, and doctors who cannot in good conscience take or administer vaccines, including those made or tested with aborted fetal cell lines. l HHS should restore Section 1557, Section 504, and other OCR regulations and fix guidance documents. In 2020, the Trump Administration’s OCR published regulations under Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act that restored the agency’s enforcement of that law to the limits of its statutory text, deferred to the ACA’s widespread use of a binary biological conception of sex discrimination, and specified that the regulation must comply with the religious exemption and abortion neutrality clauses in Title IX from which it is derived as well as the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and other laws. Courts blocked core provisions of that rule from going into effect. In 2022, the Biden Administration proposed to reinstate a rule contradicting the scope of the statute and imposing nondiscrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. It is expected that this rule will be finalized in 2023 even though several courts have issued rulings against the interpretation on which it is based. l OCR should return its enforcement of sex discrimination to the statutory framework of Section 1557 and Title IX. Specifically, it should: 1. Remove all guidance issued under the Biden Administration concerning sexual orientation and gender identity under Section 1557, particularly the May 2021 announcement of enforcement82 and March 2022 statement threatening states that protect minors from genital mutilation.83 2. Issue a general statement of policy specifying that it will not enforce any prohibition on sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination in the Section 1557 regulation and that it will prioritize compliance with the First Amendment, RFRA, and federal conscience laws in any case implicating those claims. DOJ should commit to defending these actions aggressively against inevitable court challenges, including under cases such as Heckler v. Chaney.84 — 496 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 3. Issue a proposed rule to restore the Trump regulations under Section 1557, explicitly interpreting the law not to include sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination based on the textual approach to male and female biology taken by Congress in the ACA, the need to recognize biological distinctions as part of the sound practice of health care, and the need to ensure protections of medical judgment and conscience. DOJ should agree to defend this rule to the Supreme Court if necessary. 4. Issue a general statement of policy announcing that it plans to enforce Section 1557 discrimination bans by refocusing on serious cases of race, sex, and disability discrimination. In particular, OCR should highlight its 2019 investigation and voluntary resolution agreement with Michigan State University based on the sexual abuse of gymnasts by Larry Nassar. OCR should also coordinate with the Department of Education on a public education and civil rights enforcement campaign to ensure that female college athletes who become pregnant are no longer pressured to obtain abortions; pursue race discrimination claims against entities that adopt or impose racially discriminatory policies such as those based on critical race theory; and announce its intention to enforce disability rights laws to protect children born prematurely, children with disabilities, and children born alive after abortions. 5. Issue and finalize the Trump-era draft disability rights regulations concerning crisis standards of care and use of Quality of Life Adjusted Years (QALYs), and reissue and finalize a disability regulation (withdrawn by the Biden Administration) that prohibited discriminatory application of assisted suicide and denial of life-saving treatments for disabled newborns. l OCR should withdraw its pharmacy abortion mandate guidance. OCR should withdraw its “Obligations Under Federal Civil Rights Laws to Ensure Access to Comprehensive Reproductive Health Care Services” guidance for retail pharmacies,85 which purports to address nondiscrimination obligations of pharmacies under federal civil rights laws and in fact orders them to stock and dispense first-trimester abortion drugs. The guidance invents this so-called requirement and fails to acknowledge that pharmacies and pharmacists have the right not to participate in abortions, including pill-induced abortions, if doing so would violate their sincere moral or religious objections. Moreover, no federal civil rights laws preempt state pro-life statutes.
About These Correlations
Policy matches are calculated using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text. A score of 60% or higher indicates meaningful thematic overlap. This does not imply direct causation or intent, but highlights areas where legislation aligns with Project 2025 policy objectives.