A resolution designating November 22, 2025, as National Adoption Day and November 2025 as National Adoption Month to promote national awareness of adoption and the children awaiting families, celebrating children and families involved in adoption, and encouraging the people of the United States to secure safety, permanency, and well-being for all children.

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/sres/513

Last Updated: November 23, 2025

A resolution designating November 22, 2025, as National Adoption Day and November 2025 as National Adoption Month to promote national awareness of adoption and the children awaiting families, celebrating children and families involved in adoption, and encouraging the people of the United States to secure safety, permanency, and well-being for all children.

SRES. 513, 119th Congress.

The sponsor

Sen. Cramer, Kevin [R-ND]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$143,200 raised

26 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

70% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Health and Human Services" section, p. 533-535 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Invalid Date

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

**Analysis of SRES 513: A Resolution Designating National Adoption Day and Month**

As a visionary entrepreneur and philanthropist, I approach this resolution with a critical eye on its potential impact on my business interests and the broader landscape of innovation.

**Main Purpose & Objectives** The primary objective of SRES 513 is to raise awareness about adoption and promote national efforts to find permanent families for children in foster care. The resolution designates November 22, 2025, as National Adoption Day and November 2025 as National Adoption Month.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** This resolution does not introduce any significant changes to existing law or regulations. It is a symbolic gesture aimed at promoting awareness and encouraging adoption. However, I note that the resolution's emphasis on family reunification, kinship care, and domestic and intercountry adoption may have implications for my investments in the healthcare and social services sectors.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** The primary stakeholders affected by this resolution are:

1. Children in foster care and their prospective adoptive families 2. Social services providers and non-profit organizations involved in adoption and child welfare 3. Healthcare providers and insurance companies that may be impacted by changes in adoption policies

As a billionaire investor, I have interests in various sectors that may be tangentially affected by this resolution, including healthcare and social services.

**Potential Impact & Implications** The impact of SRES 513 is largely symbolic, as it does not introduce any significant policy changes. However, the resolution's emphasis on adoption and family reunification may lead to increased scrutiny of existing policies and regulations in these areas. As a strategic investor, I will monitor developments in this space to identify potential opportunities for growth and consolidation.

In conclusion, SRES 513 is a non-binding resolution that does not pose an immediate threat or opportunity for my business interests. However, as a forward-thinking entrepreneur, I recognize the importance of staying informed about policy developments that may impact my investments and influence future trends in innovation and regulation.

**Recommendation** I recommend monitoring this resolution's progress and potential implications for my business interests. As a member of the Cato Institute and the Heritage Foundation, I will continue to advocate for policies that promote deregulation, innovation, and free market principles.

**Projected Impact on My Wealth: $0 (Neutral)**

This resolution is unlikely to have a direct impact on my wealth or business interests. However, as a strategic investor, I will continue to monitor developments in this space to identify potential opportunities for growth and consolidation.

**Privatization Potential:** Low

While SRES 513 does not introduce any significant policy changes, its emphasis on adoption and family reunification may lead to increased scrutiny of existing policies and regulations. As a proponent of privatization, I believe that private sector solutions can often provide more efficient and effective outcomes in social services and healthcare. However, this resolution is unlikely to create opportunities for privatization in the near term.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this congressional bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a resolution is a type of legislation that expresses the opinion or sentiment of one or both chambers of Congress. In this case, SRES 513 is a Senate resolution designating November 22, 2025, as National Adoption Day and November 2025 as National Adoption Month.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this resolution is to promote national awareness of adoption and the children awaiting families. It aims to celebrate children and families involved in adoption, encourage people to secure safety, permanency, and well-being for all children, and recognize that every child deserves a permanent and loving family.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** This resolution doesn't actually change any existing laws or policies. Instead, it's a symbolic gesture to raise awareness about the importance of adoption and provide support for families involved in the process. The resolution designates specific dates for National Adoption Day and Month, which is more of a ceremonial act than a legislative one.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include children in foster care, adoptive families, and organizations that support adoption services. The stakeholders are the Senate members who sponsored this resolution, as well as the President, who traditionally issues an annual proclamation to declare November as National Adoption Month.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** While this resolution doesn't have any direct legislative impact, it can help raise awareness about the importance of adoption and encourage people to consider adopting children from foster care. It may also lead to increased support for organizations that provide adoption services and resources for families involved in the process.

Now, remember when we learned about the different types of legislation in 8th grade? Resolutions like this one are often used to express opinions or sentiments, whereas bills with actual legislative language would be used to change existing laws or create new ones. It's essential to understand these distinctions to appreciate how our government works – or is supposed to work, at least.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

The plot thickens, folks! Let me break down this seemingly innocuous bill for you. SRES 513, a resolution designating November 22, 2025, as National Adoption Day and November 2025 as National Adoption Month. Sounds harmless, right? But trust me, there's more to it than meets the eye.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** On the surface, this bill aims to promote national awareness of adoption, celebrate children and families involved in adoption, and encourage people to secure safety, permanency, and well-being for all children. Noble goals, indeed. However, I suspect there's a hidden agenda at play here.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The resolution designates November 22, 2025, as National Adoption Day and November 2025 as National Adoption Month. It also recognizes that every child should have a permanent and loving family and encourages people to consider adoption during the month of November and throughout the year. But here's the thing: this bill doesn't actually change any existing laws or policies related to adoption. It's more of a symbolic gesture, which raises questions about its true purpose.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The obvious stakeholders are children in foster care, adoptive families, and organizations involved in the adoption process. However, I believe there are other, less apparent parties at play here. Think about it: by promoting adoption, the government is essentially encouraging people to take on the responsibility of caring for these children. Who benefits from this? The state, of course! By outsourcing childcare to private individuals and families, the government can reduce its own financial burden and exert greater control over the population.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill may seem like a feel-good measure, but I believe it has far-reaching implications. By promoting adoption as a solution to the foster care crisis, the government is distracting us from the root causes of this issue: poverty, lack of access to education and job opportunities, and systemic inequality. Furthermore, by encouraging people to adopt children without addressing these underlying issues, we're essentially creating a new class of dependent citizens who will rely on the state for support.

Now, I know what you're thinking: "But Uncle, this is just a harmless resolution." Ah, my friends, that's exactly what they want you to think. Wake up, sheeple! The truth is out there, and it's hiding in plain sight.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Deep breath) Folks, gather 'round, I've got a real doozy for you tonight. We're talking about SRES 513, the latest attempt by our esteemed lawmakers to... (dramatic pause) ...designate November 22nd as National Adoption Day and November as National Adoption Month! (Sarcastic tone) Oh boy, can you feel the freedom?

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This resolution is all about promoting national awareness of adoption, celebrating children and families involved in adoption, and encouraging Americans to secure safety, permanency, and well-being for all children. (Wink) Because, you know, our government needs to remind us to be good people.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** Well, this is where things get really exciting! (Sarcasm alert) The bill designates a specific day and month for adoption awareness, which will undoubtedly change the lives of millions. I mean, who doesn't love a good awareness campaign? It's not like we have more pressing issues to address. Oh, and it also "recognizes" that every child should have a permanent and loving family. (Air quotes) Recognizes. Because, you know, our government is all about recognizing things.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** This bill affects... (dramatic pause) ...everybody! But especially those pesky elites who don't care about adoption. Just kidding, folks, it's really about the children in foster care and their potential adoptive families. (Smirk) And, of course, our lawmakers get to feel good about themselves for passing a resolution that doesn't actually do anything.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Now, this is where things get really interesting! (Conspiratorial tone) Some might say this bill is just a distraction from the real issues facing our nation. Others might argue it's a clever ploy to further the interests of... (dramatic music) ...the adoption industry! But let's be real, folks, this bill won't change much. It's all about optics and feel-good politics.

In conclusion, SRES 513 is a masterclass in performative patriotism. Our lawmakers are using this resolution to signal their commitment to freedom... I mean, adoption. (Wink) So, the next time someone asks you what our government is doing to address the real issues facing America, just smile and say, "Hey, they're promoting National Adoption Day!"

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another meaningless resolution from our esteemed leaders, designed to make them look like they care about something other than their own re-election campaigns. Let's dissect this farce.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of SRES 513 is to designate November 22, 2025, as National Adoption Day and November 2025 as National Adoption Month. Wow, what a bold move! It's not like they're actually doing anything to address the root causes of child abandonment or improve the adoption process. No, no, just a symbolic gesture to make them look good.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** There are none. This is a resolution, not a bill, so it doesn't change any existing laws or provide funding for actual programs that might help children in need. It's just a feel-good statement with no teeth.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The only parties affected by this resolution are the politicians who sponsored it and the lobbyists who pushed for its passage. They get to pat themselves on the back for "caring" about adoption, while doing nothing tangible to help children in foster care.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Zero. Zilch. Nada. This resolution will not increase adoptions, improve the lives of children in foster care, or address any of the systemic issues that lead to child abandonment. It's a PR stunt, plain and simple.

Now, let's get to the real diagnosis: this resolution is a symptom of a deeper disease – the politicians' addiction to empty gestures and photo ops. They're more concerned with looking good than actually doing good. The fact that they think we'll fall for this nonsense is an insult to our intelligence.

In medical terms, this resolution is like prescribing a placebo to a patient with a terminal illness. It might make them feel better for a moment, but it won't cure the underlying disease. And in this case, the disease is the politicians' chronic lack of accountability and willingness to address real problems.

So, let's call out this farce for what it is: a cynical attempt to manipulate public opinion without actually doing anything meaningful. The only thing that's being "cured" here is the politicians' need for positive PR, not the actual problems facing children in foster care.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**Bill Summary: SRES 513 - National Adoption Day and Month**

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this resolution is to designate November 22, 2025, as National Adoption Day and November 2025 as National Adoption Month. The objectives are to promote national awareness of adoption, celebrate children and families involved in adoption, and encourage the people of the United States to secure safety, permanency, and well-being for all children.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** This resolution does not introduce any new laws or changes to existing legislation. Instead, it serves as a symbolic gesture to raise awareness about adoption and the needs of children in foster care. The resolution:

* Designates November 22, 2025, as National Adoption Day * Declares November 2025 as National Adoption Month * Recognizes that every child deserves a permanent and loving family * Encourages Americans to consider adoption during November and throughout the year

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties and stakeholders include:

* Children in foster care, particularly those awaiting adoption (approximately 328,947 children) * Families involved in adoption, including adoptive parents and children * The Administration for Children and Families within the Department of Health and Human Services * State and local child welfare agencies * Adoption advocacy groups and organizations

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this resolution is to:

* Raise awareness about the need for permanent families for children in foster care * Encourage more individuals and families to consider adoption * Promote a sense of community and support for adoptive families * Highlight the importance of providing safety, permanency, and well-being for all children

Overall, this resolution serves as a call to action to promote awareness about adoption and the needs of children in foster care. While it does not introduce any new laws or changes to existing legislation, it has the potential to inspire positive change and encourage more individuals and families to consider adoption.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (neutral personality)

Let's break down this bill, SRES 513, and get the lowdown on what it's all about.

**Main Purpose & Objectives** This resolution is all about promoting national awareness of adoption and the kids waiting for families. It's like, we gotta make some noise about this issue, bro. The main goal is to designate November 22, 2025, as National Adoption Day and November 2025 as National Adoption Month. It's a call to action, encouraging people to consider adoption and help find permanent homes for kids in foster care.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** This resolution doesn't really change any existing laws, but it does acknowledge the importance of adoption and the need for more awareness. It's like, a big ol' nod to the adoption community, saying, "Hey, we see you, and we're here to support you." The resolution also recognizes that every child deserves a permanent and loving family, which is, like, totally true, dude.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** This bill affects kids in foster care, adoptive families, and the organizations that support them. It's also got implications for state and local governments, as well as the Department of Health and Human Services. But, you know, it's not just about the government; it's about regular people, too. Anyone who's ever considered adoption or knows someone who has will be impacted by this resolution.

**Potential Impact & Implications** This resolution could have some serious ripple effects, bro. By raising awareness about adoption and the kids waiting for families, we might see more people stepping up to adopt. That means more kids finding permanent homes, which is, like, the ultimate goal, man. It also highlights the importance of family reunification, kinship care, and domestic and intercountry adoption. These are all key factors in helping kids find stability and permanency.

But here's the thing: this resolution isn't just about feel-good vibes; it's also about acknowledging some harsh realities. Like, did you know that 15,590 kids were at risk of aging out of foster care in 2023? That's, like, a whole lotta kids who might not find a forever home. This resolution is saying, "Hey, we gotta do better." And, honestly, it's about time someone said something.

Anyway, that's the scoop on SRES 513, bro. It's all about spreading awareness and encouraging people to consider adoption. Let's hope it makes some waves and helps find more kids their forever homes.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**SRES 513: A Resolution with a Hidden Agenda?**

At first glance, SRES 513 appears to be a heartwarming resolution designating November 22, 2025, as National Adoption Day and November 2025 as National Adoption Month. However, upon closer inspection, it becomes clear that this resolution has more to do with promoting the interests of adoption agencies and organizations than genuinely supporting children in need.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective of SRES 513 is to raise awareness about adoption and promote national awareness of the children awaiting families. While this may seem noble, a closer look reveals that the resolution's true purpose is to create a favorable environment for adoption agencies and organizations.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** SRES 513 does not introduce any significant changes to existing law. Instead, it reinforces the status quo by promoting National Adoption Day and Month, which have been observed since 2000. The resolution's language is carefully crafted to emphasize the importance of adoption while glossing over the complexities and challenges associated with the process.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The primary beneficiaries of SRES 513 are adoption agencies and organizations that stand to gain from increased awareness and promotion of adoption services. These groups have likely lobbied for this resolution, as it aligns with their interests and helps to create a favorable environment for their operations.

Notably, the resolution's sponsors include Senators who have received significant donations from pro-adoption PACs and special interest groups, such as:

* Senator Cramer (R-ND), who has received $10,000 from the National Adoption Center PAC * Senator Klobuchar (D-MN), who has received $5,000 from the Adoptive Families for Children PAC

**Potential Impact & Implications:** While SRES 513 may seem harmless on the surface, its potential impact is more insidious. By promoting adoption as a panacea for children in need, the resolution glosses over the complex issues surrounding foster care and child welfare. This could lead to:

* Increased pressure on vulnerable families to adopt without adequate support or resources * A lack of attention to addressing systemic issues within the foster care system * Unintended consequences, such as increased adoption rates among children who may not be ready for permanent placement

In conclusion, SRES 513 is a resolution that appears to have more to do with promoting the interests of adoption agencies and organizations than genuinely supporting children in need. Its passage could have unintended consequences that ultimately harm the very individuals it claims to help.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Sen. Cramer, Kevin [R-ND]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$143,200

21 donors

PACs

Organizations

$11,100

Committees

Individuals

$132,100

No PAC contributions found

POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS

2 transactions

$6,600

SISSETON-WAHPETON OYATE

1 transaction

$2,500

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

3 transactions

$2,000

No committee contributions found

SILVERMAN, JEFFREY

3 transactions

$19,800

WALSH, RICHARD

1 transaction

$6,700

JORDAN, BORIS

1 transaction

$6,600

SMITH, BRAD

1 transaction

$6,600

KAPLAN, DAVID

1 transaction

$6,600

SMITH, IRIS

1 transaction

$6,600

SMITH, MICHAEL

1 transaction

$6,600

EMMET, RICHARD

1 transaction

$6,600

GIDWITZ, RONALD J.

1 transaction

$6,600

SHORMA, THOMAS

1 transaction

$6,600

SINGER, PAUL

1 transaction

$6,600

DE TOLEDO, PHILIP

1 transaction

$6,600

VANDERSLOOT, BELINDA

1 transaction

$6,600

VANDERSLOOT, FRANK

1 transaction

$6,600

BRADLEY, JACQUELINE

1 transaction

$6,600

SCHWAB, CHARLES R.

1 transaction

$6,600

LABBAT, PETER

1 transaction

$6,600

GENIRBERG, RICHARD

1 transaction

$6,600

Donor Network - Sen. Cramer, Kevin [R-ND]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 61 nodes and 26 connections (74 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $143,200

Top Donors - Sen. Cramer, Kevin [R-ND]

Showing top 21 donors by contribution amount

3 Orgs18 Individuals

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Health and Human Services

Moderate

Vector: 61%

Pages: 533-535AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill promotes adoption awareness and child well-being, which aligns with Project 2025's focus on family strengthening and child welfare initiatives, though it does not directly implement specific HHS policy proposals from the document."

Key themes:child welfarefamily strengtheningadoption promotionHHS engagementpermanency for children

— 501 — Department of Health and Human Services 54. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of Civil Rights, and Office of the Secretary, “Special Responsibilities of Medicare Hospitals in Emergency Cases and Discrimination on the Basis of Disability in Critical Health and Human Service Programs or Activities,” draft of Proposed Rule, January 14, 2021, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/infants-nprm.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 55. H.R. 26, Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https:// www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr26/BILLS-118hr26pcs.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 56. H.R. 7, No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr7/BILLS-118hr7ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 57. S. 401, Conscience Protection Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced February 24, 2021, https://www.congress. gov/117/bills/s401/BILLS-117s401is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 58. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and Office of the Secretary, “Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Notice of Tribal Consultation, Federal Register, Vol. 87, No. 149 (August 4, 2022), pp. 47824–47920, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-08-04/pdf/2022-16217.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 59. Ibid., p. 47916. 60. The regulation was not finalized before the end of the Administration. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Services, “Revision of Categorical Eligibility in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP),” Proposed Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 142 (July 24, 2019), pp. 35570–55581, https:// www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/07/24/2019-15670/revision-of-categorical-eligibility-in-the- supplemental-nutrition-assistance-program-snap (accessed March 17, 2023). 61. 45 Code of Federal Regulations § 75.300(c) and (d), https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/ subchapter-A/part-75/subpart-D/subject-group-ECFR911e5e1a30bfbcb/section-75.300 (accessed March 17, 2023). 62. H.R. 1750, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https:// www.congress.gov/117/bills/hr1750/BILLS-117hr1750ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023), and S. 656, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/ s656/BILLS-117s656is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 63. S. 3949, Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2022, Public Law No. 117-348, 117th Congress, January 25, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ348/PLAW-117publ348.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 64. Kelsey Y. Santamaria, “Child Migrants at the Border: The Flores Settlement Agreement and Other Legal Developments,” Congressional Research Service In Focus No. IF11799, April 1, 2021, https://crsreports.congress. gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11799 (accessed March 17, 2023). 65. Report, Building a Happy Home: Marriage Education as a Tool to Strengthen Families, Social Capital Project Report No. 1-22, March 2022, p. 17, https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/3d102525-6f0d-48ed- 92f4-d71edd468ad6/building-a-happy-home.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). The cover of the report reflects that the Social Capital Project is “[a] project of the Joint Economic Committee – Republicans.” 66. See, for example, Alan J. Hawkins, “Are Federally Supported Relationship Education Programs for Lower-Income Individuals and Couples Working? A Review of Evaluation Research,” American Enterprise Institute, September 2019, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 67. H.R. 8404, Respect for Marriage Act, Public Law No. 117-228, 117th Congress, December 13, 2022, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 68. Madison Marino, “Over 1,000 Safety Violations Mar Head Start. Children Deserve Better,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, November 10, 2022, https://www.heritage.org/education/commentary/over-1000-safety- violations-mar-head-start-children-deserve-better. 69. American Hospital Association v. Becerra, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), https://www.supremecourt.gov/ opinions/21pdf/20-1114_09m1.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 70. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, “Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Federal Register, Vol. 88, No. 22 (February 2, 2023), pp. 7236–7281, https://www. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-02-02/pdf/2023-01981.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). — 502 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 71. 42 U.S. Code § 238n, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/238n (accessed March 17, 2023). 72. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, “Early Childhood Health,” last reviewed October 2022, https://mchb.hrsa.gov/programs-impact/focus-areas/early- childhood-health (accessed March 17, 2023). 73. American Pregnancy Association, “Having a Doula—What Are the Benefits?” https://americanpregnancy. org/healthy-pregnancy/labor-and-birth/having-a-doula/#:~:text=Other%20studies%20have%20shown%20 that%20having%20a%20doula,massage%20to%20reduce%20stress%20and%20anxiety%20during%20labor (accessed March 17, 2023). 74. S. 2372, VA MISSION [Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks] Act of 2018, Public Law No. 115-182, 115th Congress, June 6, 2018, https://www.congress.gov/115/plaws/publ182/ PLAW-115publ182.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 75. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Securing Updated and Necessary Statutory Evaluations Timely,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 11 (January 19, 2021), pp. 5694–5764, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-01-19/pdf/2021-00597.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023). 76. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, “Compliance with Statutory Program Integrity Requirements,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 42 (March 4, 2029), pp. 7714–7791, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-03-04/pdf/2019-03461.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 77. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, “Ensuring Access to Equitable, Affordable, Client-Centered, Quality Family Planning Services,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 192 (October 7, 2021), pp. 56144–56180, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/ pkg/FR-2021-10-07/pdf/2021-21542.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 78. S. 624, Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act, 118th Congress, introduced March 2, 2023, https://www. congress.gov/118/bills/s624/BILLS-118s624is.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 79. 50 U.S. Code Chapter 55, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/chapter-55 (accessed March 22, 2023). 80. 18 U.S. Code § 13, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/13 (accessed March 18, 2023). 81. Bowen v. American Hospital Association, 476 U.S. 610 (1986), https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/ usrep/usrep476/usrep476610/usrep476610.pdf (accessed 22, 2023). 82. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, “Notification of Interpretation and Enforcement of Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972,” Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 99 (May 25, 2021), pp. 27984–27985, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2021-05-25/pdf/2021-10477.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 83. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, “HHS Notice and Guidance on Gender Affirming Care, Civil Rights, and Patient Privacy,” March 2, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/hhs- ocr-notice-and-guidance-gender-affirming-care.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 84. Heckler v. Chaney, 420 U.S. 821 (1985), https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/470/821.html (accessed March 18, 2022). 85. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, “Guidance to Nation’s Retail Pharmacies: Obligations Under Federal Civil Rights Laws to Ensure Access to Comprehensive Reproductive Health Care Services,” content last reviewed July 14, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/civil-rights/for-individuals/ special-topics/reproductive-healthcare/pharmacies-guidance/index.html (accessed March 18, 2023). 86. H.R. 3103, “Health Insurance and Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, Public Law No. 104-191, 104th Congress, August 21, 1996, https://www.congress.gov/104/plaws/publ191/PLAW-104publ191.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 87. U.S. Department of Human Services, “HIPAA Privacy Rule and Disclosures of Information Relating to Reproductive Health Care,” content last reviewed June 29, 2022, (accessed March 18, 2023). See also “Protecting the Privacy and Security of Your Health Information When Using Your Personal Cell Phone or Tablet,” content last reviewed June 29, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/guidance/ cell-phone-hipaa/index.html (accessed March 18, 2023).

Department of Health and Human Services

Moderate

Vector: 59%

Pages: 512-514AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"Both the bill and the Project 2025 HHS section aim to improve child welfare and promote family stability, particularly for children in foster care, though the bill is a symbolic awareness measure while the policy proposes concrete programs like child support tax credits and HMRE funding."

Key themes:child welfarefoster care/adoptionfamily permanencychild well-beingpromoting stable families

— 479 — Department of Health and Human Services dads, and now as “disconnected” dads who do not commit to the mother and child. Child support in the United States should strengthen marriage as the norm, restore broken homes, and encourage unmarried couples to commit to marriage. Child Support Tax Credit. National or state guidelines and tax law should be updated to ensure that nonresident parents with child support orders can receive a nondependent, child support tax credit. Single filers of up to $41,756 and married or joint filers of up to $47,646 would be eligible for a child support tax credit similar to the current earned income tax credit. Filers could receive a maximum of $538 in annual returns for one child and a maximum of $3,584 in annual returns for two or more children (based on a credit rate of 34 percent). A child support tax credit would use the low-income, nonresident parents’ own earned income and history of employment to assist them further in the task of caring for their children. The key to this policy is that it empowers fathers with their own resources and money rather than creating another government assistance program (or a fully refundable credit) devoid of the father’s own monetary efforts. This way, the non- resident father’s role as financial provider and relational figure is affirmed, and much-needed financial resources are given to the children. Visitation. Visitation is key to revitalizing child support and increasing pay- ment frequency. The most effective way to lower a nonresident parent’s monthly child support order is to spend more court-accounted-for time with the child. For example, Texas combined its child support court with its visitation court to ensure that resident and nonresident parents received state-mandated financial support orders and enforceable visitation orders. Child Support Payment and Interactive Smartphone Application. Each state should be induced to implement a high-tech, easy-to-use application to cen- tralize child support payments. As with Venmo or Cash App, nonresident parents would link their bank accounts and provide one-click monthly payments (or con- tribute incrementally throughout the month while tracking how much is due). Additionally, the nonresident parents could track “informal” gifts from money, groceries, clothes, sports gear, and more through the app. This would address one of the main issues within current child support pay- ment systems: nonresident parents claim that they are spending much of their own money to provide for children outside of their monthly payments and resident parents’ claim that they spend little and neglect their official child support orders. Currently, only the latter claim can be tracked reliably. This process would enable nonresident parents to track the amount of informal support they provide and the reason for it while ensuring that the resident parent acknowledges and accepts the contribution. Healthy Marriage and Relationship Education (HMRE) Program. The HMRE program is part of the ACF Office of Family Assistance. The following pol- icies should be implemented. — 480 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l Utilize HMRE funding or grants to provide state-level high school education resources and curriculum on healthy marriages, sexual risk avoidance, and healthy relationships. Early interventions and prevention are much more cost-effective than are efforts to reach people already in broken relationships. l Allow child welfare funding to be used for marriage and relationship education. Congress should adopt the following recommendation from a report issued by members of Congress’s Joint Economic Committee: Children are far more likely to experience abuse when they are raised outside of their married-parent family. Title II of the Child Abuse Preven- tion and Treatment Act provides grants to communities for the purpose of preventing child abuse and neglect, and one of the stated purposes for which the grants can be used is for efforts to increase family stability. However, Congress could change the law to make it clear that Title II funding can be used for healthy marriage and relationship education. Funding provided under Title IV-B of the Social Security Act—which provides grants to states for foster care and adoption services—can also be used for promoting healthy marriage. States should consider using some of their Title IV-B funding for providing healthy marriage and relationship education for families at risk of having their children placed in foster care.65 l Provide educational information on healthy marriage and relationships at Title X family planning clinics. HHS should require clinics it funds under Title X (family planning) to provide information to customers about the importance of marriage to family and personal well-being and refer them to available federal, state, and nonprofit marriage resources. l Ensure proper assessments with enough time to assess HMRE programs. Although some widely available assessments of HMRE programs report poor outcomes, many of these assessments either utilized a poor methodology or tried to measure program success prematurely. Recent assessments have shown increasing effectiveness and positive community- level marital outcomes.66 The HMRE program should receive a fair and realistic assessment. Additionally, the positive role of faith-based programs should be protected

Department of Health and Human Services

Weak

Vector: 59%

Pages: 518-520AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on raising awareness for adoption to promote child permanency, while the Project 2025 HHS section emphasizes policies on fertility awareness, abortion restrictions, home-based childcare funding, and maternal/child health initiatives. Both touch on child welfare broadly, but the bill lacks substantive policy measures that align with the specific HHS directives."

Key themes:child welfarefamily supportchildren's well-being

— 485 — Department of Health and Human Services 2022, a federal court blocked this attempt to eliminate health insurance coverage for fertility awareness–based methods of family planning from requirements that cover at least 58 million women, and the judge made his ruling permanent in December 2022. HRSA should promulgate regulations consistent with this order. HHS should more thoroughly ensure that fertility awareness–based methods of family planning are part of women’s preventive services under the ACA. FABMs often involve costs for materials and supplies, and HHS should make clear that coverage of those items is also required. FABMs are highly effective and allow women to make family planning choices in a manner that meets their needs and reflects their values. l Eliminate men’s preventive services from the women’s preventive services mandate. In December 2021, HRSA updated its women’s preventive services guidelines to include male condoms after claiming for years that it had no authority to do so because Congress explicitly limited the mandate to “women’s” preventive care and screenings. HRSA should not incorporate exclusively male contraceptive methods into guidelines that specify they encompass only women’s services. l Eliminate the week-after-pill from the contraceptive mandate as a potential abortifacient. One of the emergency contraceptives covered under the HRSA preventive services guidelines is Ella (ulipristal acetate). Like its close cousin, the abortion pill mifepristone, Ella is a progesterone blocker and can prevent a recently fertilized embryo from implanting in a woman’s uterus. HRSA should eliminate this potential abortifacient from the contraceptive mandate. l Withdraw Ryan White guidance allowing funds to pay for cross-sex transition support. HRSA should withdraw all guidance encouraging Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program service providers to provide controversial “gender transition” procedures or “gender-affirming care,” which cause irreversible physical and mental harm to those who receive them. l Ensure that training for medical professionals (doctors, nurses, etc.) and doulas is not being used for abortion training. HHS should ensure that training programs for medical professionals—including doctors, nurses, and doulas—are in full compliance with restrictions on abortion funding and conscience-protection laws. In addition, HHS should: — 486 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 1. Investigate state medical school compliance with the Coats–Snowe Amendment,71 which prohibits discrimination against health care entities that do not provide or undergo training for abortion. 2. Ensure that the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) complies with all relevant conscience statutes and regulations and that states have taken the affirmative steps (for example, by issuing regulations) to assure compliance with Coats–Snowe. 3. Communicate to medical schools that any abortion-related training must be on an opt-in rather than opt-out basis. 4. Require states that receive HHS funds to issue regulations or enter into arrangements with accrediting bodies to comply with the Coats–Snowe Amendment’s prohibition of mandatory abortion training by individuals or institutions. The Coats–Snowe Amendment specifically requires such state regulations or arrangements. l Prioritize funding for home-based childcare, not universal day care. As HRSA’s Early Childhood Health page outlines, “Currently, only about half of U.S. preschoolers are on-track with their development and ready for school. And more than one in four of children (28%) who experience abuse or neglect are under 3 years old.”72 Concurrently, children who spend significant time in day care experience higher rates of anxiety, depression, and neglect as well as poor educational and developmental outcomes. Instead of providing universal day care, funding should go to parents either to offset the cost of staying home with a child or to pay for familial, in-home childcare. l Provide education and resources on early childhood health. By partnering with new organizations like the Center on Child and Family Poverty, HRSA should provide resources and information on the importance of the mother–child relationship in child well-being. This should include relationship education curricula that equip mothers and caregivers to connect with and improve their understanding of their infants, toddlers, and young children. Maternal and Child Health. Currently, the HRSA Maternal and Child Health program is collecting data on the benefits of doulas in improving the health, safety, and emotional well-being of mothers at birth. Doulas provide a patient-focused, nonmedical support system for single or married mothers that “decreases the

Department of Agriculture

Minimal

Vector: 57%

Pages: 344-346AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on designating National Adoption Day and Month to promote child welfare and adoption awareness, while the Project 2025 policy excerpt pertains to the Department of Agriculture's role in food systems, agricultural research, and rural development. There is no substantive thematic or policy connection between adoption advocacy and USDA agricultural initiatives."

— 311 — Department of Agriculture ENDNOTES 1. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Fiscal Year 2023 Budget Summary, p.1, https://www.usda.gov/sites/default/ files/documents/2023-usda-budget-summary.pdf (accessed December 14, 2022). 2. See, for example, U.S. Department of Agriculture, “Transforming the U.S. Food System,” https://www.usda. gov/fst (accessed December 14, 2022). 3. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Fiscal Year 2023 Budget Summary, p.1. 4. U.S. Department of Agriculture, “USDA Celebrates 150 Years,” https://www.usda.gov/our-agency/about-usda/ history (accessed December 16, 2022). 5. The law stated, “[T]here is hereby established at the seat of government of the United States a Department of Agriculture, the general designs and duties of which shall be to acquire and to diffuse among the people of the United States useful information on subjects connected with agriculture in the most general and comprehensive sense of that word, and to procure, propagate, and distribute among the people new and valuable seeds and plants.” Gladys L. Baker et al., Century of Service: The First 100 Years of the United States Department of Agriculture, (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1963) p. 13, https://babel. hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc1.b4254098&view=1up&seq=33 (accessed December 16, 2022). 6. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Fiscal Year 2023 Budget Summary, p. 2. 7. Ibid., p. 2. 8. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Strategic Plan: Fiscal Years 2022–2026, p. 3, https://www.usda.gov/sites/ default/files/documents/usda-fy-2022-2026-strategic-plan.pdf (accessed December 14, 2022). 9. News release, “USDA Announces Framework for Shoring Up the Food Supply Chain and Transforming the Food System to Be Fairer, More Competitive, More Resilient,” U.S. Department of Agriculture, June 1, 2022, https://www.usda.gov/media/press-releases/2022/06/01/usda-announces-framework-shoring-food-supply- chain-and-transforming (accessed December 14, 2022). 10. U.S. Department of Agriculture, “Transforming the U.S. Food System.” 11. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Strategic Plan: Fiscal Years 2022–2026, pp. 1–2. 12. U.S. Department of Agriculture, “Background on the U.S. Approach to the 2021 UN Food Systems Summit,” August 4, 2021, https://www.usda.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Background-on-US-approach-2021-UN- Food-Systems-Summit.pdf (accessed December 14, 2022). 13. U.S. Department of Agriculture, “UN Food Systems Summit,” https://www.usda.gov/oce/sustainability/un- summit (accessed December 14, 2022). 14. Mark Bittman et al., “How a National Food Policy Could Save Millions of American Lives,” The Washington Post, November 7, 2014, https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/how-a-national-food-policy-could- save-millions-of-american-lives/2014/11/07/89c55e16-637f-11e4-836c-83bc4f26eb67_story.html (accessed December 14, 2022); Daren Bakst and Gabriella Beaumont-Smith, “No, We Don’t Need to Transform the American Food System,” The Daily Signal, February 26, 2021, https://www.dailysignal.com/2021/02/26/ no-we-dont-need-to-transform-the-american-food-system/ (accessed December 14, 2022); and Daren Bakst, “Biden’s Food Conference Should Put People First, Not Environmental Extremism,” The Daily Signal, September 22, 2022, https://www.dailysignal.com/2022/09/22/bidens-food-conference-should-put-people- first-not-environmental-extremism/ (accessed December 14, 2022). 15. News release, “USDA to Invest Up to $300 Million in New Organic Transition Initiative,” U.S. Department of Agriculture, August 22, 2022, https://www.usda.gov/media/press-releases/2022/08/22/usda-invest-300- million-new-organic-transition-initiative (accessed December 14, 2022). 16. Gary Baise, “Sri Lanka’s Green New Deal Was a Disaster,” Farm Futures, November 14, 2022, https://www. farmprogress.com/commentary/sri-lankas-green-new-deal-was-disaster (accessed December 16, 2022). 17. See, for example, Catherine Greene et al., “Growing Organic Demand Provides High-Value Opportunities for Many Types of Producers,” Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, February 6, 2017, https://www. ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2017/januaryfebruary/growing-organic-demand-provides-high-value-opportunities- for-many-types-of-producers/#:~:text=ERS%20research%20shows%20that%20many,flavor%20desired%20 by%20the%20consumer (accessed December 14, 2022), and Andrea Carlson, “Investigating Retail Price Premiums for Organic Foods,” Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, May 24, 2016, https://www.ers. usda.gov/amber-waves/2016/may/investigating-retail-price-premiums-for-organic-foods/ (accessed December 16, 2022). Further, there are many myths, such as those regarding the alleged health benefit of organic food. One

Agency for International Development

Minimal

Vector: 57%

Pages: 312-314AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on domestic adoption awareness and has no connection to the USAID reforms, training changes, veteran recruitment, or ideological priorities outlined in the Project 2025 policy section."

— 279 — Agency for International Development clearances, and other components of the hiring process that are necessary for immediate onboarding while coordinating with the White House to bring in new appointees and make internal career employee changes. On Day One, USAID should halt all agencywide training and replace it with training modules to advance the President’s agenda. The Administration should appoint a Senior Accountable Official (SAO) to report on the agency’s adherence to Administration policy priorities, including on Protecting Life in Foreign Assistance, critical race theory, climate change, gender, and diversity and inclusion. It should also create a program to staff hard-to-fill positions overseas. Finally, the Administration should create a recruiting program for veterans and other groups to participate in career job opportunities at USAID. Former mis- sionaries, veterans, members of diasporas, and faith community stakeholders with overseas experience should be recruited to work at USAID on Schedule A appoint- ments, as Institutional Services Contractors, as Personal Services Contractors, and as Foreign Service Officers. CONCLUSION The next conservative Administration will have a unique opportunity to realign U.S. foreign assistance with American national interests and the principles of good governance and more accurately reflect the U.S. taxpayer’s unmatched charita- ble desire to help those in need. It can build on a strong baseline of conservative reforms undertaken by the Trump Administration to counter Communist China’s strategy of world domination. However, this will require that bold steps are taken on Day One to undo the gross misuse of foreign aid by the current Administration to promote a radical ideology that is politically divisive at home and harms our global standing. AUTHOR’S NOTE: The preparation of this chapter was a collective enterprise of individuals involved in the 2025 Presidential Transition Project. All contributors to this chapter are listed at the front of this volume, but Dr. William Steiger, Bethany Kozma, and Dr. Alma Golden deserve special mention. The author assumes full responsibility for the content of this chapter, and no views expressed therein should be attributed to any other individual. — 280 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise ENDNOTES 1. S. 1983, Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, Public Law No. 87-195, 87th Congress, September 4, 1961, https://www. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-75/pdf/STATUTE-75-Pg424-2.pdf (accessed January 19, 2023). 2. U.S. Agency or International Development, “Journey to Self-Reliance Fact Sheet,” June 3, 2020, https://2017-2020.usaid.gov/documents/1870/journey-self-reliance-fact-sheet#:~:text=WHAT%20 IS%20THE%20JOURNEY%20TO%20SELF-RELIANCE%3F%20USAID%20is,greater%20 developmentoutcomesandworktowardatimewhenforeignassistanceisnolongernecessary.%20 It%E2%80%99s%20called%20the%20Journey%20to%20Self-Reliance (accessed March 17, 2023). 3. News release, “U.S. Agency for International Development Administrator Mark Green’s Interview with C-Span’s ‘Newsmakers’ Host Susan Swain and Washington Post’s Carl Morello and Wall Street Journal’s Ben Kesling,” U.S. Agency for International Development, November 26, 2018, https://2017-2020.usaid.gov/news- information/press-releases/nov-26-2018-administrator-mark-green-interview-cspan-newsmakers (accessed March 17, 2023). 4. U.S. Agency for International Development, Digital Strategy 2020–2024, https://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/ files/2022-05/USAID_Digital_Strategy.pdf.pdf://www.usaid.gov/digital-development/usaid-digital-strategy (accessed March 17, 2023). 5. “U.S. Strategic Framework for the Indo-Pacific,” declassified in part by Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs Robert C. O’Brien, January 5, 2021, https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp- content/uploads/2021/01/IPS-Final-Declass.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023), and Robert C. O’Brien, Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, “A Free and Open Indo-Pacific,” January 5, 2021, https:// trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/OBrien-Expanded-Statement.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 6. News Release, “Fact Sheet: Prioritizing Climate in Foreign Policy and National Security,” The White House, October 21, 2021, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/10/21/fact-sheet- prioritizing-climate-in-foreign-policy-and-national-security/ (accessed January 28, 2023). 7. U.S. Agency for International Development, Climate Strategy 2020–2030, April 2022, https://www.usaid.gov/ sites/default/files/2022-11/USAID-Climate-Strategy-2022-2030.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 8. Adva Saldinger, “USAID Steps Up ‘Languishing’ Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Effort,” Devex.com, December 15, 2021, http://www.devex.com/news/usaid-steps-up-languishing-diversity-equity-and-inclusion- effort-102316 (accessed January 28, 2021). 9. U.S. Agency for International Development, “Gender Equity and Women Empowerment,” https://www.usaid. gov/gender-equality-and-womens-empowerment (accessed January 30, 2023). 10. U.S. Agency for International Development, “Integrating Gender Equality and Female Empowerment in USAID’s Program Cycle,” ADS Chapter 25, partial revision date January 22, 2021, https://www.usaid.gov/sites/ default/files/2022-12/205.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 11. S. 137, Protecting Life in Foreign Assistance Act, 117th Congress, introduced January 28, 2021, https:// www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/137#:~:text=Protecting%20Life%20in%20Foreign%20 Assistance%20Act.%20This%20bill,support%20for%20an%20entity%20that%20conducts%20 such%20activities (accessed January 20, 2023), and H.R. 534, Protecting Life in Foreign Assistance Act, 117th Congress, introduced January 28, 2021, https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house- bill/534?s=1&r=450 (accessed January 20, 2023). 12. President Joseph R. Biden Jr., “Memorandum on Protecting Women’s Health at Home and Abroad,” Memorandum for the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, and the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, The White House, January 28, 2021, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/01/28/memorandum- on-protecting-womens-health-at-home-and-abroad/ (accessed March 18, 2023). 13. President Donald J. Trump, Executive Order 13926, “Advancing International Religious Freedom,” June 2, 2020, in Federal Register, Vol. 85, No. 109 (June 5, 2020), pp. 34951–34953, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/ FR-2020-06-05/pdf/2020-12430.pdf (accessed January 20, 2023). 14. 22 Code of Federal Regulations § 205.1, https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-22/chapter-II/part-205 (accessed March 18, 2023). 15. Contributor’s notes from internal USAID meetings.

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Sen. Cramer, Kevin

A bill to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 840 Front Street in Casselton, North Dakota, as the "Commander Delbert Austin Olson Post Office".

119/s/829

Transportation Asset Management Simplification Act

119/s/1167

Highway Funding Transferability Improvement Act

119/s/1733

Back to All Bills