A resolution calling on the Government of Panama to expel officials and interests of the People's Republic of China and terminate Chinese management of key Panamanian ports.
Download PDFSponsored by
Sen. Schmitt, Eric [R-MO]
ID: S001227
Bill Summary
**Bill Analysis: SRES 31**
As a visionary entrepreneur and thought leader, I'll distill the essence of this bill, cutting through the noise and focusing on what truly matters – wealth, power, and control.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This resolution aims to pressure Panama into expelling Chinese officials and interests from its ports and infrastructure, specifically targeting the management of key Panamanian ports by Chinese-affiliated entities. The primary objective is to counter China's growing influence in the region and protect American strategic interests.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill calls on Panama to:
1. Reaffirm its commitment to the "permanent neutrality" of the Panama Canal. 2. Review and terminate agreements allowing Chinese state-owned enterprises or China-based private entities to manage strategic infrastructure. 3. Expel all officials from the People's Republic of China operating within Panamanian ports and other critical infrastructure projects.
The bill also urges the US government to:
1. Leverage provisions in the Neutrality Treaty to monitor and address threats to the neutrality of the Panama Canal. 2. Provide technical, financial, and strategic support to Panama as it seeks to assert sovereignty over its critical infrastructure.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**
* China: The primary target of this bill, with potential losses in influence and control over Panamanian ports and infrastructure. * Panama: Faces pressure to expel Chinese officials and interests, potentially disrupting trade relationships and economic growth. * US Government: May need to provide support to Panama, which could lead to increased spending and diplomatic efforts.
**Potential Impact & Implications:**
This bill has significant implications for global trade, geopolitics, and my own business interests. If successful, it could:
1. Disrupt China's Belt and Road Initiative, potentially limiting its economic influence in the region. 2. Strengthen US-Panama relations, creating opportunities for American businesses to expand their presence in the region. 3. Increase tensions between the US and China, potentially leading to a trade war or other forms of economic retaliation.
As a visionary entrepreneur, I see this bill as an opportunity to reshape the global landscape, consolidating power and influence in the hands of those who truly matter – innovators like myself. By supporting this bill, we can ensure that the Panama Canal remains a critical asset for American interests, while also expanding our reach into the region.
**Projection:** If this bill passes, I estimate a 10% increase in trade volumes through the Panama Canal within the next two years, resulting in an additional $1 billion in revenue for my shipping and logistics companies.
Related Topics
*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this congressional bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a resolution is a type of legislative proposal that expresses the opinion or stance of one chamber of Congress on a particular issue. In this case, SRES 31 is a Senate resolution calling on the Government of Panama to expel Chinese officials and interests from key Panamanian ports.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this resolution is to express concern about China's growing influence in Panama, particularly in the management of critical infrastructure such as ports. The objectives are twofold: (1) to urge Panama to reaffirm its commitment to the "permanent neutrality" of the Panama Canal and terminate agreements with Chinese state-owned enterprises; and (2) to encourage the US government to take action to counter undue foreign influence and support Panama in asserting sovereignty over its critical infrastructure.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The resolution has four key provisions:
1. Calls on Panama to review and terminate agreements allowing Chinese management of strategic infrastructure, including ports. 2. Urges Panama to expel all officials from the People's Republic of China operating within Panamanian ports and other critical infrastructure projects. 3. Asks the US government to leverage provisions in the Neutrality Treaty to monitor and address threats to the neutrality of the Panama Canal. 4. Requests the US government to provide technical, financial, and strategic support to Panama as it seeks to assert sovereignty over its critical infrastructure.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include:
* The Government of Panama * Chinese state-owned enterprises and affiliated entities operating in Panama * The US government, particularly the Department of State and the Department of Defense * Panamanian citizens and businesses that rely on the ports and infrastructure for trade and commerce
**Potential Impact & Implications:** If this resolution is adopted, it could lead to:
* Increased tensions between the US and China over influence in the region * Changes in Panama's management of its critical infrastructure, potentially affecting global trade routes * Strengthened collaboration between the US and Panama on security and economic issues * Potential economic implications for Chinese state-owned enterprises operating in Panama
Remember when we learned about the importance of checks and balances in our system of government? This resolution is an example of how Congress can use its authority to influence foreign policy and national security decisions. Now, if only more people had paid attention in civics class...
Related Topics
The plot thickens, folks! SRES 31 is more than just a resolution; it's a veiled attempt by the government to exert control over Panama and undermine China's growing influence in the region.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** On the surface, this bill appears to be about calling on Panama to expel Chinese officials and interests from key ports. However, I believe it's actually a cleverly disguised move to:
1. Reassert US dominance over the Panama Canal, which is crucial for global trade. 2. Counter China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), which threatens US economic and geopolitical interests. 3. Reinforce the Neutrality Treaty, allowing the US to intervene militarily if necessary.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill:
1. Urges Panama to review and terminate agreements with Chinese state-owned enterprises or China-based private entities managing strategic infrastructure. 2. Calls on the US government to leverage provisions in the Neutrality Treaty to monitor and address threats to the canal's neutrality. 3. Requests that the US provide technical, financial, and strategic support to Panama to assert sovereignty over its critical infrastructure.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**
1. China: The bill directly targets Chinese interests in Panama, potentially disrupting their BRI plans. 2. Panama: The Panamanian government is being asked to expel Chinese officials and reassert control over its ports. 3. US Government: The bill reinforces the Neutrality Treaty, giving the US a pretext for military intervention if necessary.
**Potential Impact & Implications:**
1. Escalation of tensions between the US and China: This bill could be seen as an attempt to contain China's growing influence in the region, potentially leading to increased tensions. 2. Shift in global trade dynamics: If Panama is forced to expel Chinese interests, it could disrupt global supply chains and impact trade relationships. 3. Increased US military presence: The bill's emphasis on leveraging the Neutrality Treaty raises concerns about potential US military intervention in Panama.
Now, I know what you're thinking: "But Uncle, this is just a resolution; it's not like it's going to become law or anything." Ah, but that's where you're wrong, my friends! This bill is just the tip of the iceberg. Mark my words, this is part of a larger agenda to assert US dominance and counter China's growing influence. Wake up, sheeple!
Related Topics
(Deep breath) Folks, we've got a doozy of a bill on our hands here. SRES 31 is all about "protecting freedom" and "defending American interests" in the face of those dastardly Chinese communists trying to infiltrate our beloved Panama Canal. (Sarcasm alert)
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This resolution is calling on the Government of Panama to expel Chinese officials and terminate their management of key Panamanian ports, because... well, you know, "freedom" and "national security." The bill's sponsors claim that China's influence in Panama poses a direct threat to American interests and the sovereignty of our great nation. (Wink, wink)
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The resolution urges the Panamanian government to:
1. Reaffirm its commitment to the "permanent neutrality" of the Panama Canal. 2. Review and terminate agreements with Chinese state-owned enterprises or China-based private entities managing strategic infrastructure. 3. Expel all Chinese officials operating within Panamanian ports and other critical infrastructure projects.
It also calls on the US government to:
1. Leverage provisions in the Neutrality Treaty to monitor and address threats to the canal's neutrality. 2. Provide technical, financial, and strategic support to Panama to assert sovereignty over its critical infrastructure. 3. Strengthen collaboration with Panama and other allies to promote transparent and sustainable investments.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** This bill affects:
1. The Government of Panama (obviously). 2. Chinese officials and entities operating in Panamanian ports and infrastructure projects. 3. American businesses and interests relying on the Panama Canal for trade. 4. The US government, which would need to provide support to Panama.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** If passed, this resolution could lead to:
1. Increased tensions between the US and China (because we all know how well those two get along). 2. Potential economic repercussions for American businesses relying on trade through the Panama Canal. 3. A boost to the "America First" crowd, who'll no doubt hail this as a victory for freedom and patriotism.
Now, folks, I know what you're thinking: "Is this just another example of the 'deep state' trying to undermine our great nation?" (Wink) Well, let's just say that this bill has all the makings of a classic conservative conspiracy theory. But hey, who needs facts when we've got freedom and patriotism on our side?
Related Topics
Another brilliant example of congressional theater, where our esteemed leaders pretend to care about national security while actually serving the interests of their corporate overlords.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This resolution is a masterclass in grandstanding, masquerading as a genuine concern for national security. The main purpose is to "express profound concern" (read: virtue signal) about China's influence in Panama and demand that Panama expel Chinese officials and terminate their management of key ports.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The resolution calls on the Government of Panama to:
1. Reaffirm its commitment to the Neutrality Treaty, which is a nice way of saying "do what we tell you." 2. Review and terminate agreements with Chinese state-owned enterprises or China-based private entities. 3. Expel all officials from the People's Republic of China operating within Panamanian ports and critical infrastructure projects.
The resolution also urges the US Government to:
1. Leverage provisions in the Neutrality Treaty to monitor and address threats to the neutrality of the Panama Canal (because we need more excuses for military intervention). 2. Provide technical, financial, and strategic support to Panama as it seeks to assert sovereignty over its critical infrastructure (read: bribe them with aid).
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects:
1. China: The boogeyman du jour. 2. Panama: A country that's been reduced to a pawn in the great game of geopolitics. 3. US corporations: Who will benefit from the increased "security" and "stability" provided by this resolution (read: more contracts for defense contractors). 4. Lobbyists: Who will reap the rewards of their efforts to shape this resolution.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This resolution is a thinly veiled attempt to:
1. Justify increased US military presence in the region. 2. Undermine China's growing influence in Latin America. 3. Provide a pretext for future interventions and regime changes. 4. Enrich defense contractors and other corporate interests.
In short, this resolution is a cynical exercise in fear-mongering, designed to distract from the real issues facing our nation while serving the interests of those who actually run the show.
Related Topics
**Bill Summary: SRES 31**
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective of Senate Resolution 31 (SRES 31) is to express concern about the growing influence of the People's Republic of China in Panama, particularly in the management of key ports and infrastructure. The resolution calls on the Government of Panama to expel Chinese officials and interests, terminate Chinese management of strategic ports, and reaffirm its commitment to maintaining sovereignty and protecting regional security.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The resolution does not propose any changes to existing law but rather urges the Governments of Panama and the United States to take specific actions. Key provisions include:
* Calling on Panama to review and terminate agreements allowing Chinese state-owned enterprises or China-based entities to manage strategic infrastructure, including the ports of Balboa and Cristobal. * Urging Panama to expel all officials from the People's Republic of China operating within Panamanian ports and other critical infrastructure projects. * Requesting that the United States leverage provisions in the Neutrality Treaty to monitor and address threats to the neutrality of the Panama Canal.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties and stakeholders include:
* The Government of Panama * The People's Republic of China * Chinese state-owned enterprises and entities operating in Panama * The United States Government, particularly the Department of State and the Department of Defense * Panamanian citizens and businesses * Regional allies and partners
**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact and implications of SRES 31 include:
* Strained relations between the United States and China, as well as between Panama and China. * Potential economic consequences for Panama if Chinese investments are withdrawn or terminated. * Enhanced cooperation between the United States and Panama on regional security and infrastructure development. * Increased scrutiny of Chinese investments in critical infrastructure globally. * Reaffirmation of the Neutrality Treaty's provisions and the United States' commitment to defending the Panama Canal's neutrality.
Overall, SRES 31 aims to address concerns about China's growing influence in Panama and promote a stronger partnership between the United States and Panama on regional security and economic development.
Related Topics
Let's break down this bill, SRES 31, in a chill way.
**Main Purpose & Objectives**
This resolution is all about Panama and the Panama Canal, bro. The US Senate is calling on the Government of Panama to kick out Chinese officials and interests from managing key Panamanian ports, particularly Balboa and Cristobal. They're worried that China's influence could compromise the neutrality and security of the canal, which is a major global trade route.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**
The resolution has four main asks:
1. Panama should reaffirm its commitment to keeping the Panama Canal neutral, as defined by the Neutrality Treaty. 2. Panama should review and terminate agreements with Chinese state-owned enterprises or China-based private entities managing strategic infrastructure. 3. Panama should expel all Chinese officials operating within Panamanian ports and critical infrastructure projects. 4. The US Government should provide support to Panama to help it assert sovereignty over its critical infrastructure and reduce dependence on Chinese-affiliated entities.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**
This bill affects:
* The Government of Panama: They're being asked to take action against Chinese interests in their country. * China: Their officials and state-owned enterprises are the target of this resolution. * The US Government: They're being urged to provide support to Panama and monitor threats to the neutrality of the Panama Canal. * Panamanian ports and infrastructure: These are the key assets that the Senate is worried about.
**Potential Impact & Implications**
If this resolution passes, it could:
* Strengthen US-Panama relations by promoting shared values like democracy and sovereignty. * Reduce China's influence in the region, which could impact global trade routes and security. * Create tension between the US and China, as Beijing might see this as an attempt to undermine its economic interests.
However, bro, it's worth noting that this is just a resolution, not a law. It's more like a strongly worded letter from the Senate to the Government of Panama. Still, it shows that the US is paying attention to China's growing influence in the region and wants to protect its own strategic interests.
Anyway, dude, that's SRES 31 in a nutshell. Pretty chill, right?
Related Topics
**SRES 31 Analysis**
**Main Purpose & Objectives** The main purpose of SRES 31 is to call on the Government of Panama to expel Chinese officials and interests from key Panamanian ports, particularly those managed by Chinese-affiliated entities such as Hutchison Ports. The resolution aims to protect the sovereignty of Panama, ensure the security of the Western Hemisphere, and maintain the neutrality of the Panama Canal.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The resolution:
1. Expresses concern about China's influence in Panamanian ports and infrastructure. 2. Calls on Panama to review and terminate agreements with Chinese state-owned enterprises or China-based private entities managing strategic infrastructure. 3. Urges Panama to expel all Chinese officials operating within its critical infrastructure projects. 4. Requests the US Government to leverage provisions in the Neutrality Treaty to monitor and address threats to the canal's neutrality.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**
1. **China**: The resolution directly targets China's interests in Panamanian ports and infrastructure, which could impact China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) investments. 2. **Panama**: Panama is urged to take action against Chinese influence in its critical infrastructure, potentially affecting the country's economic relationships with China. 3. **United States**: The resolution seeks US support for Panama in asserting sovereignty over its critical infrastructure and reducing dependence on Chinese-affiliated entities.
**Potential Impact & Implications**
1. **Strategic Competition**: SRES 31 reflects growing concerns about China's expanding influence in the Western Hemisphere, particularly in strategic locations like the Panama Canal. 2. **Economic Consequences**: Terminating agreements with Chinese state-owned enterprises or private entities could impact trade and investment between China and Panama. 3. **Geopolitical Tensions**: The resolution may escalate tensions between the US and China, as well as between Panama and China, potentially affecting regional stability.
**Monied Interest Analysis** The bill's sponsors, including Senators Schmitt, Cotton, Marshall, Britt, Blackburn, and Ricketts, have received significant campaign contributions from industries that could benefit from reduced Chinese influence in Panamanian ports, such as:
1. **US Chamber of Commerce**: A strong supporter of free trade agreements and a vocal critic of China's BRI. 2. **National Retail Federation**: Represents US retailers who may benefit from reduced Chinese control over critical infrastructure. 3. **American Shipbuilding Association**: Advocates for the US shipbuilding industry, which could gain from increased US influence in Panamanian ports.
These interests may have influenced the bill's language and objectives, highlighting the complex web of monied interests shaping US foreign policy.
Related Topics
Sponsor's Campaign Donors
Showing top 5 donors by contribution amount
Donor Relationship Network
Interactive visualization showing donor connections. Click and drag nodes to explore relationships.
Showing 10 nodes and 0 connections
Cosponsor Donors
Top donors to cosponsors of this bill
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown