A resolution recognizing and supporting the goals and ideals of National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month.

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/sres/179

Last Updated: April 10, 2025

A resolution recognizing and supporting the goals and ideals of National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month.

SRES. 179, 119th Congress — read as touching Law Enforcement & Surveillance Tech.

The sponsor

Sen. Grassley, Chuck [R-IA]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$82,472 raised

23 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

70% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Education" section, p. 365-367 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Invalid Date

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

**Bill Analysis: SRES 179 - National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month**

As a visionary entrepreneur and thought leader, I'll dissect this bill through the lens of its implications on wealth, power, and innovation.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This resolution aims to recognize and support the goals of National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month. It's a symbolic gesture, devoid of any tangible legislative impact. The primary objective is to raise awareness about sexual violence and encourage prevention efforts.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** None. This bill doesn't introduce new legislation or modify existing laws. It's a non-binding resolution that merely expresses the Senate's sentiment on the matter.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The primary stakeholders are:

1. Survivors of sexual assault and their families 2. Organizations focused on preventing sexual violence, such as RAINN and local rape crisis centers 3. Law enforcement agencies and the Department of Defense

However, from a business perspective, this bill doesn't directly impact my interests or those of my fellow entrepreneurs.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This resolution is largely inconsequential for my empire's growth and profitability. However, I'll highlight some potential implications:

1. **Increased awareness**: A heightened focus on sexual assault prevention might lead to increased scrutiny of businesses' handling of such cases, potentially affecting their reputation and bottom line. 2. **Regulatory creep**: Although this bill doesn't introduce new regulations, it may set the stage for future legislation that could impact businesses, particularly those in industries with high-risk profiles (e.g., hospitality, education). 3. **Innovation opportunities**: The emphasis on prevention and awareness might create opportunities for innovative solutions, such as AI-powered reporting tools or virtual reality-based training programs.

To summarize, SRES 179 is a symbolic resolution that doesn't directly impact my business interests. However, it's essential to monitor the conversation around sexual assault prevention, as it may have indirect implications for businesses and innovation in the future.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this resolution, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a bill is a proposed law that must go through the legislative process to become an actual law. This particular bill, SRES 179, is a Senate resolution recognizing and supporting National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this resolution is to acknowledge the prevalence of sexual violence in the United States and express support for efforts to prevent it. The objectives are twofold: (1) to educate the public about sexual violence, and (2) to encourage prevention, improved treatment of survivors, and prosecution of perpetrators.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** This resolution doesn't actually change any existing laws; it's more of a symbolic gesture. It acknowledges the importance of addressing sexual violence and expresses support for organizations working towards this goal. There are no specific provisions or changes to existing law.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include survivors of sexual assault, their families, and organizations that provide services to them. The stakeholders are various government agencies, non-profit organizations, and advocacy groups focused on preventing and addressing sexual violence.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** While this resolution doesn't have any direct legislative impact, it raises awareness about the issue of sexual violence and encourages support for efforts to prevent it. By acknowledging the prevalence of sexual violence, the Senate is sending a message that this is an important issue that needs attention. However, as we covered in 8th grade civics class, resolutions like these often don't lead to tangible changes without accompanying legislation.

Now, I know some of you might be thinking, "But wait, isn't this just a feel-good resolution?" And yes, it is. But remember when we learned about the importance of symbolic gestures and raising awareness in civics class? This resolution serves as a reminder that even small actions can contribute to a larger conversation.

Moving on... *sigh*

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

My fellow truth-seekers, gather 'round! Today, we're diving into the depths of SRES 179, a congressional bill that's got all the hallmarks of a Trojan horse. On the surface, it's about recognizing and supporting National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month. But, my friends, don't be fooled – there's more to this bill than meets the eye.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The stated purpose is to raise awareness about sexual assault and support its prevention. Sounds noble, right? However, I'd argue that this is just a smokescreen for something more sinister. The real objective might be to create a framework for increased surveillance and control under the guise of "prevention" and "support."

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill doesn't explicitly change any existing laws, but it does provide a framework for future legislation. It's like they're setting the stage for something bigger. Pay attention to Section 2, which mentions "advances in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) technology." This could be a backdoor for increased DNA collection and surveillance.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** On the surface, this bill seems to benefit survivors of sexual assault and organizations that support them. However, I'd argue that it's actually a ploy to expand government control over these groups. Think about it – by providing funding and resources, the government can exert influence over these organizations and dictate their agendas.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill could lead to increased surveillance, DNA collection, and control over survivors of sexual assault. It might also create a culture of fear, where people are more likely to report others for perceived "misconduct." The economic burden of $3.1 trillion mentioned in the bill is suspiciously high – what's the real motive behind highlighting this number?

Now, I know some of you might think I'm being paranoid, but trust me, there's always more to these bills than meets the eye. Wake up, sheeple! The government is hiding something in plain sight.

As we enjoy our Thanksgiving feast, let's not forget to question everything – especially when it comes to congressional bills like SRES 179. Remember, the truth is out there, and I'll keep digging until we uncover it.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Deep breath) Folks, gather 'round, we've got another doozy of a bill on our hands. SRES 179, or as I like to call it, the "Feel-Good Resolution of the Month." (smirk)

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

This resolution is all about recognizing and supporting National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month. Because, you know, we need a whole month dedicated to something that's already a no-brainer: preventing sexual assault. I mean, who doesn't want to prevent sexual assault? (eyeroll) It's like saying, "Hey, let's have a national day for breathing oxygen!" (chuckle)

The objectives are straightforward: raise awareness, educate the public, and encourage prevention, treatment, and prosecution of perpetrators. Yadda yadda yadda.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

Well, here's the thing: this resolution doesn't actually change any existing law. It's more like a pat on the back for all the good folks working to prevent sexual assault. (wink) There are no new policies or regulations being implemented; it's just a feel-good statement from our esteemed senators.

However, if you're looking for some juicy tidbits, there are mentions of DNA technology advancements and the importance of partnerships between law enforcement agencies, health professionals, and victim service providers. Oh, and did I mention that 48% of rape crisis centers lack a therapist on staff? (gasp) Shocking!

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

This resolution affects... well, everyone! (dramatic music) Just kidding; it's mainly targeting survivors of sexual assault, their loved ones, and the organizations working to support them. You know, the usual suspects: RAINN, local rape crisis centers, and the Department of Defense.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

Now, here's where things get interesting. While this resolution might not change any laws, it does provide a platform for awareness and education. And let's be real, folks; raising awareness is key to preventing sexual assault. (smirk) I mean, who doesn't love a good hashtag campaign? #NationalSexualAssaultAwarenessMonth

On a more serious note, this resolution could lead to increased funding for organizations working to prevent sexual assault and support survivors. And hey, that's not a bad thing! (wink)

In conclusion, SRES 179 is a resolution that's all about feel-good vibes and awareness-raising. While it might not be the most substantial piece of legislation, it's a step in the right direction. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to go prepare for my next segment: "The Deep State's War on Freedom... and Your Favorite Coffee Shop." (dramatic music)

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another exercise in legislative theater, courtesy of the esteemed members of the United States Senate. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of SRES 179 is to recognize and support the goals and ideals of National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month. How noble. The objectives are to educate the public about sexual violence, encourage prevention, improve treatment for survivors, and prosecute perpetrators. Yawn. We've heard it all before.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** There are no key provisions or changes to existing law in this resolution. It's a feel-good, non-binding declaration that accomplishes nothing concrete. The Senate is simply patting itself on the back for acknowledging the existence of sexual assault and expressing support for those affected by it.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include survivors of sexual assault, rape crisis centers, community-based organizations, and law enforcement agencies. Oh, and let's not forget the politicians who get to grandstand about their commitment to this cause without actually doing anything meaningful.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact is zero. Zilch. Nada. This resolution will not lead to any tangible changes in policy or legislation that would address the root causes of sexual assault or provide meaningful support to survivors. It's a symbolic gesture, a Band-Aid on a bullet wound.

In reality, this resolution is a symptom of a deeper disease: the politicians' addiction to empty rhetoric and their cowardice in addressing complex issues like sexual assault. They'd rather issue platitudes than take concrete steps to address the systemic problems that enable these crimes.

The real motivations behind this resolution are likely a mix of ego-stroking, vote-buying, and fundraising opportunities. The sponsors of this bill want to appear compassionate and concerned about an important social issue without actually doing anything that might require effort or compromise.

In short, SRES 179 is a legislative placebo – it may make you feel good for a moment, but it won't cure the disease.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**SRES 179: A Resolution Recognizing and Supporting the Goals and Ideals of National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month**

**Main Purpose & Objectives** The main purpose of SRES 179 is to recognize and support the goals and ideals of National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month, which aims to educate the public about sexual violence, prevent sexual assault, improve treatment for survivors, and prosecute perpetrators.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** This resolution does not introduce any new laws or changes to existing law. Instead, it serves as a statement of support from the Senate for National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month. The resolution:

* Recognizes the prevalence of sexual violence in the United States * Acknowledges the impact of sexual assault on individuals, communities, and society as a whole * Commends organizations and individuals working to prevent sexual violence and support survivors * Encourages education, prevention, and prosecution efforts

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** The affected parties and stakeholders include:

* Survivors of sexual assault and their loved ones * Organizations providing services for survivors, such as rape crisis centers and national hotlines (e.g., RAINN) * Law enforcement agencies and the Department of Defense * Communities disproportionately affected by sexual violence, including communities of color and American Indians and Alaska Natives

**Potential Impact & Implications** The resolution may have several potential impacts and implications:

* Increased awareness about sexual violence and its effects on individuals and society * Greater recognition of the importance of prevention efforts and support services for survivors * Encouragement of partnerships among organizations, law enforcement agencies, and communities to address sexual violence * Potential increased funding or resources for organizations providing services for survivors and working to prevent sexual violence

Overall, SRES 179 serves as a statement of support from the Senate for National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month, acknowledging the importance of addressing sexual violence and promoting education, prevention, and prosecution efforts.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (neutral personality)

Let's break down this bill, SRES 179, and get a solid understanding of what it's all about.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

This resolution is all about recognizing and supporting the goals and ideals of National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month. It's like, we're acknowledging that sexual assault is a major issue in our country, and we want to do something about it. The main objective is to raise awareness, prevent sexual violence, and support survivors.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

This resolution doesn't actually change any existing laws, but it does:

* Recognize the prevalence of sexual assault and its impact on individuals and communities * Acknowledge the importance of prevention, education, and awareness efforts * Commend organizations and individuals working to support survivors and prevent sexual violence * Encourage the prosecution of perpetrators and improvement in treatment for survivors

It's more like a statement of intent, you know? It's saying, "Hey, we care about this issue, and we want to do something about it."

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

This resolution affects:

* Survivors of sexual assault * Organizations working to support survivors and prevent sexual violence (like RAINN) * Law enforcement agencies * Healthcare providers * Educators * First responders * Victim service providers

It's like, everyone who cares about this issue is affected by this resolution.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

The potential impact of this resolution is:

* Increased awareness and education about sexual assault prevention * More support for survivors and organizations working to help them * Improved treatment and prosecution of perpetrators * A stronger sense of community and solidarity around this issue

It's like, by acknowledging the importance of this issue, we're taking a step towards creating a culture that prevents sexual violence and supports those affected by it.

But, you know, it's not all sunshine and rainbows. There are still some major challenges to address, like:

* The fact that many survivors don't report their assaults * The lack of resources for organizations working to support survivors * The need for more education and awareness efforts

It's like, we've got a long way to go, but this resolution is a step in the right direction.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**SRES 179: A Resolution Recognizing and Supporting the Goals and Ideals of National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month**

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective of SRES 179 is to recognize and support the goals and ideals of National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month. The resolution aims to raise awareness about sexual violence, promote prevention efforts, and encourage improved treatment for survivors.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** This resolution does not introduce any new legislation or changes to existing law. Instead, it serves as a symbolic gesture to acknowledge the importance of addressing sexual assault and promoting awareness. The resolution:

* Recognizes the prevalence of sexual violence in the United States * Highlights the impact on various populations, including women, men, children, and communities of color * Commends organizations and individuals working to prevent and address sexual assault * Urges continued efforts to educate the public, improve treatment for survivors, and prosecute perpetrators

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The resolution affects various stakeholders, including:

* Survivors of sexual assault and their families * Organizations providing support services for survivors, such as RAINN and local rape crisis centers * Law enforcement agencies and prosecutors working to address sexual violence * Healthcare providers and mental health professionals treating survivors * Advocacy groups focused on preventing and addressing sexual assault

**Potential Impact & Implications:** While this resolution does not introduce new legislation, it has several potential implications:

* Raises awareness about the prevalence and impact of sexual violence, potentially leading to increased public engagement and support for prevention efforts * Commends organizations and individuals working to address sexual assault, which may encourage continued funding and resource allocation for these efforts * May lead to increased pressure on lawmakers to introduce legislation addressing specific aspects of sexual violence, such as statute of limitations reform or improved support services for survivors

**Monied Interest Analysis:** There is no apparent direct financial interest driving this resolution. However, it's worth noting that organizations like RAINN and local rape crisis centers may benefit from increased funding and resources if awareness and public engagement around the issue increase.

**Committee Capture and Conflicts of Interest:** No committee capture or conflicts of interest are evident in this resolution, as it is a symbolic gesture rather than a substantive policy proposal.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Sen. Grassley, Chuck [R-IA]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$130,307

63 donors

PACs

Organizations

Committees

$3,000

Individuals

$127,307

No PAC contributions found

No organization contributions found

SAC & FOX TRIBE OF THE MISSISSIPPI IN IOWA

1 transaction

$2,000

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

1 transaction

$1,000

KUMAR, SHALLI

2 transactions

$9,900

SCHWARZMAN, CHRISTINE

2 transactions

$9,900

SCHWARZMAN, STEPHEN

2 transactions

$9,900

ARVIG, ALLEN

3 transactions

$6,710

STARRETT, RONALD

2 transactions

$5,800

COLLINS, RICHARD

1 transaction

$5,523

MALONE, KIP

6 transactions

$4,520

DETERMAN, MARK

1 transaction

$3,300

MCKEE, JACK C

1 transaction

$3,300

WEISS, LUKE

1 transaction

$3,300

PECK JR, JOHN

1 transaction

$2,900

LEIGH, JOHN

4 transactions

$2,715

COLLINS, III, HENRY L.

1 transaction

$2,601

POSNER, IDA MOLLOY

1 transaction

$2,500

VANDERHAAG, JOHN

3 transactions

$2,500

DIMARE, SCOTT

3 transactions

$1,500

RADY, PAUL

2 transactions

$1,500

VANDER HAAG, JOHN C

1 transaction

$1,500

RICHARDS, MARY

2 transactions

$1,435

NWANERI, MATTHEW

1 transaction

$1,200

FRENCH, ARTHUR

1 transaction

$1,000

JUCKETTE, LINDA

1 transaction

$1,000

KOROLOGOS, TOM C

1 transaction

$1,000

LARSON, ELLEN T

1 transaction

$1,000

MANATOS, ANDREW E

1 transaction

$1,000

MERCHANT, AHMED

1 transaction

$1,000

PATRICK, CHRIS MR..

1 transaction

$1,000

ROGERS, DIRKSEN

1 transaction

$1,000

SABIN, DANIEL

2 transactions

$1,000

SCUDDER, JACK

1 transaction

$1,000

SMITH, JAMES A

1 transaction

$1,000

SMITH, THOMAS STUART MR..

1 transaction

$1,000

VANDERPOOL, MARYLEE

1 transaction

$1,000

JOHNS, SUSAN

1 transaction

$990

PHELPS, DICK

1 transaction

$910

HESS, CURTIS

1 transaction

$750

LUO, KERRI

1 transaction

$750

WILLIAMS, ANGELA

1 transaction

$630

AXMEAR, FRED

1 transaction

$500

FRANKEN, KEN

1 transaction

$500

HARKEN, MARY J

1 transaction

$500

HASKENHOFF, TINA

1 transaction

$500

HILL, VERNON

1 transaction

$500

HUSSAIN, SULEMAN

1 transaction

$500

JOHNSON, WAYNE

1 transaction

$500

KOESTNER, RICHARD

1 transaction

$500

LILLIS, TERRY

1 transaction

$500

MCKEON, PATRICIA

1 transaction

$500

MCMICKLE, JOHN

1 transaction

$500

MOGLER, DEVIN

1 transaction

$500

PECK, JOHN

1 transaction

$500

RITTS, SUSAN BUTLER

1 transaction

$500

SUTTER, THEODORE

1 transaction

$500

VANDER HAAG, RUTH

1 transaction

$500

VANKERCKHOVE, BRUCE

1 transaction

$500

VIGO, JUDITH

1 transaction

$500

WHITCOMB, STANLEY

1 transaction

$500

Donor Network - Sen. Grassley, Chuck [R-IA]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 43 nodes and 23 connections (59 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $82,472

Top Donors - Sen. Grassley, Chuck [R-IA]

Showing top 15 donors by contribution amount

1 PAC2 Committees12 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 1 helped.

+Law Enforcement & Surveillance Techconfidence 0.80
The bill recognizes the importance of law enforcement agencies in identifying and prosecuting perpetrators of sexual assault, which could be seen as a benefit to the industry (Section: Whereas advances in deoxyribonucleic acid (commonly known as `DNA') technology have enabled law enforcement agencies to identify and prosecute the perpetrators in tens of thousands of previously unsolved sexual assault cases).

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Education

Moderate

Vector: 58%

Pages: 365-367AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"Both the bill and the Project 2025 excerpt address sexual violence and Title IX enforcement, but the bill focuses on awareness and prevention while Project 2025 seeks to rescind certain Title IX expansions and define sex biologically, resulting in partial thematic overlap."

Key themes:sexual assaultTitle IXdue processsurvivor supportawareness

— 332 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise to create and collect data on a new “nonbinary” sex category (in addition to the current “male” or “female” sex categories) and to retire data collection that indi- cates the number of (1) high school–level interscholastic athletics sports in which only male and female students participate, (2) high school–level athletics teams in which only male or female students participate, and (3) participants on high school–level interscholastic athletics sports teams in which only male or only female students participate. These poorly conceived changes are contrary to law, fail to take account of student privacy interests and statutory protections favoring parental rights under the Protection of Pupils Rights Amendment, and jettison longstanding data collections that assist in the enforcement of Title IX. l The new Administration must quickly move to rescind these changes, which add a new “nonbinary” sex category to OCR’S data collection and issue a new CRDC that will collect data directly relevant to OCR’s statutory enforcement authority. Student Assistance General Provisions, Federal Perkins Loan Program, and William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program Final Regulations Effective July 1, 2023, the department promulgated final regulations addressing loan forgiveness under the HEA’s provisions for borrower defense to repayment (“BDR”), closed school loan discharge (“CSLD”), and public service loan forgive- ness (“PSLF”). The regulations also included prohibitions against pre-dispute arbitration agreements and class action waivers for students enrolling in institu- tions participating in Title IV student loan programs. Acting outside of statutory authority, the current Administration has drastically expanded BDR, CSLD, and PSLF loan forgiveness without clear congressional authorization at a tremendous cost to the taxpayers, with estimates ranging from $85.1 to $120 billion. l The new Administration must quickly commence negotiated rulemaking and propose that the department rescind these regulations. l The next Administration should also rescind Dear Colleague Letter (DCL) GEN 22-11 and DCL GEN 22-10 and its letters to accreditation agencies dated July 19, 2022, which are attempts to undercut Florida’s SB 7044, providing universities more flexibility on accreditation. Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance (Title IX) With its Notice of Proposed Rulemaking published on July 12, 2022, the Biden Education Department seeks to gut the hard-earned rights of women with its changes to the department’s regulations implementing Title IX, which prohibits — 333 — Department of Education discrimination on the basis of sex in educational programs and activities. Instead, the Biden Administration has sought to trample women’s and girls’ athletic oppor- tunities and due process on campus, threaten free speech and religious liberty, and erode parental rights in elementary and secondary education regarding sensitive issues of sex. The new Administration should take the following steps: l Work with Congress to use the earliest available legislative vehicle to prohibit the department from using any appropriations or from otherwise enforcing any final regulations under Title IX promulgated by the department during the prior Administration. l Commence a new agency rulemaking process to rescind the current Administration’s Title IX regulations; restore the Title IX regulations promulgated by then-Secretary Betsy DeVos on May 19, 2020; and define “sex” under Title IX to mean only biological sex recognized at birth. l Work with Congress to amend Title IX to include due process requirements; define “sex” under Title IX to mean only biological sex recognized at birth; and strengthen protections for faith-based educational institutions, programs, and activities. The Trump Administration’s 2020 Title IX regulation protected the founda- tional right to due process for those who are accused of sexual misconduct. The Biden Administration’s proposed change to the interpretation of Title IX disposes of these rights. l The next Administration should move quickly to restore the rights of women and girls and restore due process protections for accused individuals. At the same time, there is no scientific or legal basis for redefining “sex” to “sexual orientation and gender identity” in Title IX. Such a change misrepresents the U.S. Supreme Court’s opinion in Bostock, threatens the American system of federalism, removes important due process protections for students in higher education, and puts girls and women in danger of physical harm. Facilitating social gender transition without parental consent increases the likelihood that children will seek hormone treatments, such as puberty blockers, which are experimental medical interventions. Research has not demonstrated positive effects and long- term outcomes of these treatments, and the unintended side effects are still not fully understood.

Department of Health and Human Services

Weak

Vector: 59%

Pages: 533-535AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"SRES 179 focuses on sexual assault awareness and prevention, while the Project 2025 HHS section emphasizes abortion restrictions, conscience protections, gender-affirming care limitations, and reproductive healthcare access—topics not addressed in the resolution. The only tangential connection is a shared concern for healthcare-related civil rights and survivor support, but the policy goals diverge significantly."

Key themes:healthcare accesscivil rightssurvivor supportprevention efforts

— 501 — Department of Health and Human Services 54. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of Civil Rights, and Office of the Secretary, “Special Responsibilities of Medicare Hospitals in Emergency Cases and Discrimination on the Basis of Disability in Critical Health and Human Service Programs or Activities,” draft of Proposed Rule, January 14, 2021, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/infants-nprm.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 55. H.R. 26, Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https:// www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr26/BILLS-118hr26pcs.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 56. H.R. 7, No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr7/BILLS-118hr7ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 57. S. 401, Conscience Protection Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced February 24, 2021, https://www.congress. gov/117/bills/s401/BILLS-117s401is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 58. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and Office of the Secretary, “Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Notice of Tribal Consultation, Federal Register, Vol. 87, No. 149 (August 4, 2022), pp. 47824–47920, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-08-04/pdf/2022-16217.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 59. Ibid., p. 47916. 60. The regulation was not finalized before the end of the Administration. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Services, “Revision of Categorical Eligibility in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP),” Proposed Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 142 (July 24, 2019), pp. 35570–55581, https:// www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/07/24/2019-15670/revision-of-categorical-eligibility-in-the- supplemental-nutrition-assistance-program-snap (accessed March 17, 2023). 61. 45 Code of Federal Regulations § 75.300(c) and (d), https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/ subchapter-A/part-75/subpart-D/subject-group-ECFR911e5e1a30bfbcb/section-75.300 (accessed March 17, 2023). 62. H.R. 1750, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https:// www.congress.gov/117/bills/hr1750/BILLS-117hr1750ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023), and S. 656, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/ s656/BILLS-117s656is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 63. S. 3949, Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2022, Public Law No. 117-348, 117th Congress, January 25, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ348/PLAW-117publ348.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 64. Kelsey Y. Santamaria, “Child Migrants at the Border: The Flores Settlement Agreement and Other Legal Developments,” Congressional Research Service In Focus No. IF11799, April 1, 2021, https://crsreports.congress. gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11799 (accessed March 17, 2023). 65. Report, Building a Happy Home: Marriage Education as a Tool to Strengthen Families, Social Capital Project Report No. 1-22, March 2022, p. 17, https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/3d102525-6f0d-48ed- 92f4-d71edd468ad6/building-a-happy-home.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). The cover of the report reflects that the Social Capital Project is “[a] project of the Joint Economic Committee – Republicans.” 66. See, for example, Alan J. Hawkins, “Are Federally Supported Relationship Education Programs for Lower-Income Individuals and Couples Working? A Review of Evaluation Research,” American Enterprise Institute, September 2019, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 67. H.R. 8404, Respect for Marriage Act, Public Law No. 117-228, 117th Congress, December 13, 2022, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 68. Madison Marino, “Over 1,000 Safety Violations Mar Head Start. Children Deserve Better,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, November 10, 2022, https://www.heritage.org/education/commentary/over-1000-safety- violations-mar-head-start-children-deserve-better. 69. American Hospital Association v. Becerra, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), https://www.supremecourt.gov/ opinions/21pdf/20-1114_09m1.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 70. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, “Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Federal Register, Vol. 88, No. 22 (February 2, 2023), pp. 7236–7281, https://www. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-02-02/pdf/2023-01981.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). — 502 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 71. 42 U.S. Code § 238n, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/238n (accessed March 17, 2023). 72. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, “Early Childhood Health,” last reviewed October 2022, https://mchb.hrsa.gov/programs-impact/focus-areas/early- childhood-health (accessed March 17, 2023). 73. American Pregnancy Association, “Having a Doula—What Are the Benefits?” https://americanpregnancy. org/healthy-pregnancy/labor-and-birth/having-a-doula/#:~:text=Other%20studies%20have%20shown%20 that%20having%20a%20doula,massage%20to%20reduce%20stress%20and%20anxiety%20during%20labor (accessed March 17, 2023). 74. S. 2372, VA MISSION [Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks] Act of 2018, Public Law No. 115-182, 115th Congress, June 6, 2018, https://www.congress.gov/115/plaws/publ182/ PLAW-115publ182.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 75. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Securing Updated and Necessary Statutory Evaluations Timely,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 11 (January 19, 2021), pp. 5694–5764, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-01-19/pdf/2021-00597.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023). 76. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, “Compliance with Statutory Program Integrity Requirements,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 42 (March 4, 2029), pp. 7714–7791, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-03-04/pdf/2019-03461.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 77. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, “Ensuring Access to Equitable, Affordable, Client-Centered, Quality Family Planning Services,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 192 (October 7, 2021), pp. 56144–56180, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/ pkg/FR-2021-10-07/pdf/2021-21542.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 78. S. 624, Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act, 118th Congress, introduced March 2, 2023, https://www. congress.gov/118/bills/s624/BILLS-118s624is.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 79. 50 U.S. Code Chapter 55, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/chapter-55 (accessed March 22, 2023). 80. 18 U.S. Code § 13, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/13 (accessed March 18, 2023). 81. Bowen v. American Hospital Association, 476 U.S. 610 (1986), https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/ usrep/usrep476/usrep476610/usrep476610.pdf (accessed 22, 2023). 82. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, “Notification of Interpretation and Enforcement of Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972,” Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 99 (May 25, 2021), pp. 27984–27985, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2021-05-25/pdf/2021-10477.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 83. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, “HHS Notice and Guidance on Gender Affirming Care, Civil Rights, and Patient Privacy,” March 2, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/hhs- ocr-notice-and-guidance-gender-affirming-care.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 84. Heckler v. Chaney, 420 U.S. 821 (1985), https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/470/821.html (accessed March 18, 2022). 85. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, “Guidance to Nation’s Retail Pharmacies: Obligations Under Federal Civil Rights Laws to Ensure Access to Comprehensive Reproductive Health Care Services,” content last reviewed July 14, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/civil-rights/for-individuals/ special-topics/reproductive-healthcare/pharmacies-guidance/index.html (accessed March 18, 2023). 86. H.R. 3103, “Health Insurance and Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, Public Law No. 104-191, 104th Congress, August 21, 1996, https://www.congress.gov/104/plaws/publ191/PLAW-104publ191.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 87. U.S. Department of Human Services, “HIPAA Privacy Rule and Disclosures of Information Relating to Reproductive Health Care,” content last reviewed June 29, 2022, (accessed March 18, 2023). See also “Protecting the Privacy and Security of Your Health Information When Using Your Personal Cell Phone or Tablet,” content last reviewed June 29, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/guidance/ cell-phone-hipaa/index.html (accessed March 18, 2023).

Department of Health and Human Services

Weak

Vector: 59%

Pages: 518-520AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"SRES 179 focuses on sexual assault awareness and prevention, while the Project 2025 HHS section emphasizes abortion training compliance, home-based childcare funding, maternal health (including doula support), and rural/Indian Health Service reforms. There is minimal thematic overlap, primarily in the broad area of health and well-being, but no direct alignment on specific policies or objectives."

Key themes:healthmaternal and child healthpublic awareness

— 486 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 1. Investigate state medical school compliance with the Coats–Snowe Amendment,71 which prohibits discrimination against health care entities that do not provide or undergo training for abortion. 2. Ensure that the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) complies with all relevant conscience statutes and regulations and that states have taken the affirmative steps (for example, by issuing regulations) to assure compliance with Coats–Snowe. 3. Communicate to medical schools that any abortion-related training must be on an opt-in rather than opt-out basis. 4. Require states that receive HHS funds to issue regulations or enter into arrangements with accrediting bodies to comply with the Coats–Snowe Amendment’s prohibition of mandatory abortion training by individuals or institutions. The Coats–Snowe Amendment specifically requires such state regulations or arrangements. l Prioritize funding for home-based childcare, not universal day care. As HRSA’s Early Childhood Health page outlines, “Currently, only about half of U.S. preschoolers are on-track with their development and ready for school. And more than one in four of children (28%) who experience abuse or neglect are under 3 years old.”72 Concurrently, children who spend significant time in day care experience higher rates of anxiety, depression, and neglect as well as poor educational and developmental outcomes. Instead of providing universal day care, funding should go to parents either to offset the cost of staying home with a child or to pay for familial, in-home childcare. l Provide education and resources on early childhood health. By partnering with new organizations like the Center on Child and Family Poverty, HRSA should provide resources and information on the importance of the mother–child relationship in child well-being. This should include relationship education curricula that equip mothers and caregivers to connect with and improve their understanding of their infants, toddlers, and young children. Maternal and Child Health. Currently, the HRSA Maternal and Child Health program is collecting data on the benefits of doulas in improving the health, safety, and emotional well-being of mothers at birth. Doulas provide a patient-focused, nonmedical support system for single or married mothers that “decreases the — 487 — Department of Health and Human Services overall cesarean rate by 50%, the length of labor by 25%, the use of oxytocin by 40%, and requests for an epidural by 60%. Doulas often use the power of touch and massage to reduce stress and anxiety during labor.”73 Given concerns about maternal mortality or postpartum depression that is worsened by poor birth experiences, doulas should be an active option for all women whether they are giving birth in a traditional hospital, through midwifery, or at home. Additionally, since most Doulas’ services are not covered by traditional insurance programs, the Maternal and Child Health program should work to pro- vide funding for low-income mothers. INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE (IHS) The Indian Health Service serves our American Indian and Alaska Native popu- lations. Reforms are needed to improve America’s ability to deliver on its promises to these important populations and must take account of cultural preferences and lifestyles, limitations due to geography (such as challenging terrain), and limited Internet access. For example, contacting individuals within some of these com- munities and tribes during the COVID-19 pandemic proved to be difficult because many had transient addresses and unreliable cell service. During the transition to the Biden Administration, IHS abandoned tribes as their sources of COVID-19 tests and vaccine supplies disappeared. It is important to guard against such situations in order to preserve these tribes’ access to health resources during public health emergencies (PHEs). Even before the pandemic, services available to these populations through federal resources and personnel (such as vision care) were often scarce or nonexistent. Patients in these populations should be empowered to rely on alternatives to IHS through better access to private health care providers. Exploring positive reforms contained in the VA MISSION Act74 could reveal similar opportunities for increased options and access for American Indians and Alaska Natives. RURAL HEALTH A growing concern is the decreasing access to health care services for Americans living in rural, less populated areas. Many find themselves in regions that were not previously as rural as industries move away, taking with them economic prosperity and often medical providers. Others are in essential professions such as farming that by nature necessitate living in regions with fewer city accommodations and economic opportunities. Seeking space for one’s family and cultivating the land are valued goals that are deeply rooted in America’s fabric. Both Congress and an Administration must continually keep in mind how health care policies uniquely affect these regions because their market trends and populations are different from those of more populous regions. Often, rural patients face an hour’s drive to the nearest medical provider or facility or have

Department of Health and Human Services

Weak

Vector: 59%

Pages: 515-517AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on sexual assault awareness and prevention, while the Project 2025 excerpt addresses family caregiver strategy, HRSA data policies, telehealth licensing, and contraceptive mandate issues. Both touch on health-related prevention and support services, but their substantive topics and policy levers do not directly overlap."

Key themes:health preventionwomen's healthpublic awarenesssupport services

— 483 — Department of Health and Human Services l Readdress the National Strategy to Support Family Caregivers. While in theory the strategy aims to support family members with duties to care for older family members, the plan is overly focused on racial and “LGBTQ+ equity.” The strategy should be examined to establish an efficient plan to support caregivers and their families. There should also be a review of its COVID-19 policies. HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES ADMINISTRATION (HRSA) l Congress should allow CMS to use the 340B data that HRSA collects rather than having CMS conduct its own survey, especially in view of the U.S. Supreme Court’s American Hospital Association v. Becerra decision.69 The legislation should also create penalties for those who do not respond to HRSA’s data collection. l Legally define the locus of service as where the provider is located during the telehealth visit rather than where the patient is. With such a definition, states could continue to reserve their powers to establish the standards for licensure and scope of practice. The providers could ensure continuity and consistency of care no matter where their patients might move while maintaining the licenses that make the most sense for them. Americans are far more mobile and technologically advanced today than they were when most health care laws were written. Telehealth has become increasingly important, particularly during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. It also has great potential in rural and other areas where there are shortages of health care providers. HRSA’s Office for the Advancement of Telehealth includes a program known as the Licensure Portability Grant Program, which bolsters state efforts to reform licensing laws to maximize telehealth flexibility. HRSA does not have the authority through this office to dictate licensure laws; that power has typically been reserved to the states. However, telehealth across state lines, when permitted, is interstate commerce, which can be regulated by the federal government according to the Constitution. l Restore Trump religious and moral exemptions to the contraceptive mandate (also a CMS rule). HHS should rescind, if finalized, the regulation titled “Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act,” proposed jointly by HHS, Treasury, and Labor.70 This rule proposes to amend Trump-era final rules regarding religious and moral exemptions and accommodations for coverage of certain preventive services under the ACA. Preventive services include contraception, and — 484 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise it appears the proposed rule would change the existing regulations for religious and moral exemptions to the ACA’s contraception mandate. There is no need for further rulemaking that curtails existing exemptions and accommodations. l Require HRSA to use rulemaking to update the women’s preventive services mandate. The contraceptive mandate issued under Obamacare has been the source of years of egregious attacks on many Americans’ religious and moral beliefs. The mandate was issued as part of the women’s preventive services guidelines, which were issued without any rulemaking that involved public notice and an opportunity to comment. Instead, HRSA issued and changed the mandate by simply posting changes to its website. HRSA also started off not requiring coverage of fertility awareness–based methods of family planning, then requiring them, and then removing the requirement without notifying the public. A federal judge recently ruled that this failure to undergo notice and comment in issuing the mandate is unlawful. HRSA should be required to repromulgate any women’s preventive services mandates through the notice and comment process that is compliant with the Administrative Procedures Act. Moreover, since the Obama Administration HRSA entered into long- term contracts with the pro-abortion American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and related entities to serve as an exclusive adviser with respect to the content of this mandate, HRSA has used this arrangement to ignore comments that members of the public were sometimes able to submit in the process, and ACOG has abused its position to attack HHS’s allowance of religious and moral exemptions to the contraceptive mandate. HHS should rescind these contracts and establish an advisory committee that is compliant with the Federal Advisory Committee Act and has members that are committed to women’s preventive services and are not pro-abortion ideologues. l Expand inclusion of fertility awareness–based methods and supplies to family planning in the women’s preventive services mandate. The ACA requires coverage of and prevents insurance plans from imposing any cost-sharing requirements on women who obtain preventive care and screenings as defined by HRSA. In 2016, HHS included “instruction in fertility awareness-based methods” as part of this requirement. However, in December 2021, HHS removed that language from its list without using the notice-and-comment process or giving any rationale, both of which are mandated by the Administrative Procedures Act. In August

Department of Health and Human Services

Weak

Vector: 58%

Pages: 518-520AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on sexual assault awareness and prevention, while the Project 2025 HHS section centers on reproductive health policies, contraception, abortion restrictions, gender transition care, and childcare. Both touch on public health prevention and support services, but their substantive objectives do not directly overlap."

Key themes:public health preventionawareness campaignssupport services

— 485 — Department of Health and Human Services 2022, a federal court blocked this attempt to eliminate health insurance coverage for fertility awareness–based methods of family planning from requirements that cover at least 58 million women, and the judge made his ruling permanent in December 2022. HRSA should promulgate regulations consistent with this order. HHS should more thoroughly ensure that fertility awareness–based methods of family planning are part of women’s preventive services under the ACA. FABMs often involve costs for materials and supplies, and HHS should make clear that coverage of those items is also required. FABMs are highly effective and allow women to make family planning choices in a manner that meets their needs and reflects their values. l Eliminate men’s preventive services from the women’s preventive services mandate. In December 2021, HRSA updated its women’s preventive services guidelines to include male condoms after claiming for years that it had no authority to do so because Congress explicitly limited the mandate to “women’s” preventive care and screenings. HRSA should not incorporate exclusively male contraceptive methods into guidelines that specify they encompass only women’s services. l Eliminate the week-after-pill from the contraceptive mandate as a potential abortifacient. One of the emergency contraceptives covered under the HRSA preventive services guidelines is Ella (ulipristal acetate). Like its close cousin, the abortion pill mifepristone, Ella is a progesterone blocker and can prevent a recently fertilized embryo from implanting in a woman’s uterus. HRSA should eliminate this potential abortifacient from the contraceptive mandate. l Withdraw Ryan White guidance allowing funds to pay for cross-sex transition support. HRSA should withdraw all guidance encouraging Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program service providers to provide controversial “gender transition” procedures or “gender-affirming care,” which cause irreversible physical and mental harm to those who receive them. l Ensure that training for medical professionals (doctors, nurses, etc.) and doulas is not being used for abortion training. HHS should ensure that training programs for medical professionals—including doctors, nurses, and doulas—are in full compliance with restrictions on abortion funding and conscience-protection laws. In addition, HHS should: — 486 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 1. Investigate state medical school compliance with the Coats–Snowe Amendment,71 which prohibits discrimination against health care entities that do not provide or undergo training for abortion. 2. Ensure that the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) complies with all relevant conscience statutes and regulations and that states have taken the affirmative steps (for example, by issuing regulations) to assure compliance with Coats–Snowe. 3. Communicate to medical schools that any abortion-related training must be on an opt-in rather than opt-out basis. 4. Require states that receive HHS funds to issue regulations or enter into arrangements with accrediting bodies to comply with the Coats–Snowe Amendment’s prohibition of mandatory abortion training by individuals or institutions. The Coats–Snowe Amendment specifically requires such state regulations or arrangements. l Prioritize funding for home-based childcare, not universal day care. As HRSA’s Early Childhood Health page outlines, “Currently, only about half of U.S. preschoolers are on-track with their development and ready for school. And more than one in four of children (28%) who experience abuse or neglect are under 3 years old.”72 Concurrently, children who spend significant time in day care experience higher rates of anxiety, depression, and neglect as well as poor educational and developmental outcomes. Instead of providing universal day care, funding should go to parents either to offset the cost of staying home with a child or to pay for familial, in-home childcare. l Provide education and resources on early childhood health. By partnering with new organizations like the Center on Child and Family Poverty, HRSA should provide resources and information on the importance of the mother–child relationship in child well-being. This should include relationship education curricula that equip mothers and caregivers to connect with and improve their understanding of their infants, toddlers, and young children. Maternal and Child Health. Currently, the HRSA Maternal and Child Health program is collecting data on the benefits of doulas in improving the health, safety, and emotional well-being of mothers at birth. Doulas provide a patient-focused, nonmedical support system for single or married mothers that “decreases the

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Sen. Grassley, Chuck

Bankruptcy Threshold Adjustment Act of 2026

119/s/3977

A bill to expand the sharing of information with respect to suspected violations of intellectual property rights in trade.

119/s/2677

Protecting First Responders from Secondary Exposure Act of 2025

119/s/180

Back to All Bills