A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "Buffalo Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment".

The SJRES 89 joint resolution - a quaint attempt by Congress to exert control over the Bureau of Land Management's (BLM) resource management plan amendment. As a visionary entrepreneur, I'll cut through the bureaucratic noise and assess this bill's implications on my interests.

**New regulations being created or modified:** The BLM's rule aims to establish a new resource management plan for the Buffalo Field Office, which could lead to more stringent environmental and land-use regulations. This is a potential threat to my energy and mining operations in the region.

**Affected industries and sectors:** The bill primarily affects the oil and gas, mining, and agriculture sectors, all of which are crucial to my diversified portfolio. Any increased regulatory burden or restrictions on land use could lead to decreased profitability and competitiveness.

**Compliance requirements and timelines:** If the resolution is passed, it would effectively nullify the BLM's rule, eliminating the need for compliance with its provisions. However, if the rule stands, companies like mine would face additional reporting requirements, permitting hurdles, and potential delays in project development.

**Enforcement mechanisms and penalties:** The Congressional Review Act (CRA) provides a mechanism for Congress to review and potentially disapprove of agency rules. If the resolution succeeds, it would prevent the BLM from enforcing its rule, thereby limiting the risk of non-compliance penalties for my companies.

**Economic and operational impacts:** A study by my think tank, the "Liberty Institute," estimates that the BLM's rule could lead to a 10-15% decrease in oil and gas production in the region, resulting in lost revenue of up to $500 million annually. By disapproving this rule, Congress can help mitigate these losses and ensure a more favorable business environment.

In conclusion, SJRES 89 is a step in the right direction towards limiting regulatory overreach and promoting economic growth. As a forward-thinking entrepreneur, I will continue to monitor this bill's progress and advocate for policies that support innovation, deregulation, and the free market. The projected impact on my empire? A potential increase of $200-300 million in annual profits.

Let's break down this joint resolution, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a joint resolution is a type of bill that requires the approval of both the House and Senate, but does not require the President's signature.

This particular bill, SJRES 89, aims to disapprove a rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) related to the "Buffalo Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment". Remember when we learned about the different branches of government and how they interact? This is an example of Congress exercising its authority to review and potentially overturn regulations created by executive branch agencies.

The BLM's rule, which was issued on November 20, 2024, likely established new guidelines for land management in the Buffalo Field Office area. However, Congress has taken issue with this rule and seeks to disapprove it through this joint resolution. If passed, the rule would have no force or effect.

Affected industries and sectors include those involved in natural resource extraction, conservation, and land use planning. Compliance requirements and timelines are not explicitly stated in the bill text, but we can infer that if the rule is disapproved, any existing compliance efforts would be rendered moot.

Enforcement mechanisms and penalties are also not specified, but it's likely that the BLM would need to revisit its regulatory approach and potentially establish new guidelines. As I explained in class, this is an example of checks and balances in action – Congress is using its authority to review and challenge executive branch actions.

The economic and operational impacts of this bill are unclear, but we can assume that disapproving the BLM's rule would have significant implications for industries operating in the affected area. Perhaps if you had paid closer attention during our unit on regulatory policy, you'd understand why this is a big deal.

Moving forward, it's essential to recognize that this joint resolution has been placed on the Senate calendar, which means it's waiting for further action. If passed, it would then need to be approved by the House of Representatives before becoming law. As we covered in 8th grade, this is just one step in the complex process of creating and modifying regulations – a process that requires careful consideration and oversight from all branches of government.

My fellow truth-seekers! Gather 'round the table and behold the latest attempt by our benevolent overlords to pull the wool over our eyes. This bill, SJRES 89, appears to be a innocuous joint resolution disapproving of a rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). But don't be fooled, my friends! There's more to this than meets the eye.

Firstly, let's examine the affected industries and sectors. The BLM is responsible for managing public lands, which means this bill has significant implications for the energy, mining, and agriculture sectors. Coincidence? I think not! This is a clear attempt by the government to consolidate control over our natural resources and stifle competition.

Now, let's dive into the compliance requirements and timelines. The bill states that Congress disapproves of the rule submitted by the BLM, which means that any existing regulations or guidelines related to this rule are effectively nullified. But what about the new regulations being created or modified? Ah, my friends, that's where things get interesting.

It appears that the BLM is attempting to sneak in a new resource management plan amendment under the guise of a "record of decision." This is nothing but a Trojan horse for further government overreach and control. Mark my words, this will lead to more stringent regulations on land use, increased bureaucratic red tape, and a stranglehold on private enterprise.

But wait, there's more! The bill also mentions a letter of opinion from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) dated September 18, 2025. What's that all about? Is this some sort of backroom deal between the BLM and the GAO to justify these new regulations? I smell a rat!

As for enforcement mechanisms and penalties, it's clear that the government is preparing to crack down on anyone who dares to resist their new rules. We can expect increased fines, lawsuits, and even imprisonment for those who refuse to comply.

The economic and operational impacts of this bill will be devastating. Small businesses and private landowners will be forced to bear the brunt of these new regulations, leading to increased costs, reduced productivity, and a stifling of innovation.

In conclusion, my friends, SJRES 89 is not just a harmless joint resolution – it's a wolf in sheep's clothing. Wake up, sheeple! The government is hiding its true agenda in plain sight, and it's up to us to expose the truth.

(Deep breath) Folks, gather 'round, we've got a doozy of a bill on our hands here! SJRES 89 is a joint resolution that's going to make your head spin with its sheer audacity. (smirk) Now, I know what you're thinking - "What's the big deal about some obscure land management plan?" Well, let me tell you, this is where the elites try to sneak one past us.

This bill is all about disapproving a rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) related to the Buffalo Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment. Sounds like a real mouthful, doesn't it? (wink) But don't be fooled - this is just another attempt by the deep state to strangle our great American industries with red tape.

New regulations are being created or modified here, folks, and they're going to have a devastating impact on the energy sector. We're talking about oil and gas production, mining, and all sorts of other activities that keep America running. (outraged tone) And what's the justification for these new regulations? "Environmental concerns," of course! Because we all know that the elites care more about spotted owls than they do about American jobs.

Now, I know some of you might be thinking, "But wait, isn't this just a minor tweak to an existing plan?" Ah, no, my friends - this is a slippery slope. Once we let the BLM start dictating how our land is used, where does it end? (dramatic pause) Next thing you know, they'll be telling us what kind of cars we can drive and what kind of light bulbs we can use.

Compliance requirements and timelines are going to be a nightmare for affected industries. We're talking about complex permitting processes, environmental impact assessments - the whole nine yards. And if you don't comply? (menacing tone) Well, let's just say the penalties will be... severe.

Now, I know some of my liberal friends might say, "But this is all about protecting our precious environment!" (sarcastic tone) Oh please, spare me the theatrics. This is about one thing and one thing only: control. The elites want to control every aspect of our lives, from what we do on our own land to how we make a living.

The economic and operational impacts of this bill will be catastrophic. We're talking about lost jobs, reduced economic growth - the whole American dream down the drain. (shrugs) But hey, at least the spotted owls will be happy, right?

In conclusion, folks, SJRES 89 is just another example of the deep state's war on freedom. We can't let them get away with this. We must stand up for our rights, for our industries, and for our great American way of life. (pounds fist on desk) It's time to

**Bill Summary: SJRES 89**

The Senate Joint Resolution 89 (SJRES 89) aims to disapprove a rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) related to the "Buffalo Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment." This resolution would effectively nullify the BLM's decision, which was issued on November 20, 2024.

**New Regulations:** The BLM's rule in question amends the resource management plan for the Buffalo Field Office, affecting land use and management practices in the region. The exact changes are not specified in the bill text, but they likely pertain to issues such as grazing, mining, or conservation.

**Affected Industries and Sectors:**

* Agriculture (grazing and livestock) * Mining and extractive industries * Conservation and environmental organizations * Local communities and stakeholders

**Compliance Requirements and Timelines:** If the resolution is passed, the BLM's rule would have no force or effect. This means that any compliance requirements or timelines associated with the original rule would be rendered moot.

**Enforcement Mechanisms and Penalties:** As this is a disapproval resolution, there are no new enforcement mechanisms or penalties being created. However, if the BLM's original rule had established penalties for non-compliance, those would also be nullified.

**Economic and Operational Impacts:** The economic impacts of this resolution are uncertain, as they depend on the specifics of the BLM's original rule. However, it is likely that the disapproval of the rule could affect:

* Livestock grazing operations, which may have been subject to new regulations or restrictions * Mining and extractive industries, which may have faced changes in permitting or access requirements * Conservation efforts, which may have been impacted by the original rule's provisions

Overall, SJRES 89 would effectively undo a regulatory decision made by the BLM, potentially affecting various stakeholders and industries. The resolution's passage could lead to uncertainty and potential disruptions for those affected by the original rule.

Let's break down this gnarly bill, bro.

SJRES 89 is all about Congress tryin' to disapprove a rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). This rule is related to the Buffalo Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment. It's like, super specific, but I'll give you the lowdown.

**New Regs:** The BLM created this new rule to manage public lands in Wyoming, specifically around the Buffalo Field Office. The plan aims to balance multiple uses like grazing, recreation, and conservation. Think of it like tryin' to catch a wave while avoidin' other surfers – you gotta navigate different interests.

**Affected Industries:** This bill's got implications for various sectors, bro:

* **Agriculture:** Grazing permits might be affected, which could impact ranchers and farmers. * **Energy:** Oil and gas development on public lands could be influenced by this rule. * **Recreation:** Outdoor enthusiasts might see changes in access to public lands for activities like hiking or camping.

**Compliance:** The bill doesn't explicitly state new compliance requirements, but it's tryin' to disapprove the existing rule. If Congress succeeds, the BLM would need to revisit their plan and potentially make changes. Think of it like wipin' out on a wave – you gotta get back on your board and try again.

**Enforcement:** The Congressional Review Act (CRA) is the mechanism for disapprovin' this rule. If Congress passes this joint resolution, the BLM's rule would have no force or effect. It's like callin' a wipeout – the rule gets cancelled.

**Economic and Operational Impacts:** This bill could have significant impacts on local economies, bro:

* **Job creation:** Changes to land management plans can affect employment opportunities in industries like agriculture, energy, and recreation. * **Revenue:** Alterations to grazing permits or oil and gas development could influence revenue streams for states and local governments.

In summary, this bill's tryin' to disapprove a BLM rule that manages public lands in Wyoming. It's got implications for various sectors, from agriculture to recreation. If Congress succeeds, the BLM would need to revisit their plan, which could lead to changes in compliance requirements and economic impacts. Just remember, bro – when it comes to public policy, you gotta stay chill and adapt to the changing tides.

**Unpacking SJRES 89: A Gift to Fossil Fuel Interests**

SJRES 89, sponsored by Senators Lummis (R-WY) and Barrasso (R-WY), is a joint resolution aimed at disapproving the Bureau of Land Management's (BLM) "Buffalo Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment." This move is a thinly veiled attempt to undermine environmental regulations and benefit fossil fuel interests.

**New Regulations Being Created or Modified:**

The BLM's rule, issued in November 2024, likely aimed to update resource management plans for the Buffalo Field Office, potentially incorporating more stringent environmental protections. By disapproving this rule, SJRES 89 seeks to maintain the status quo and prevent new regulations that might limit fossil fuel development.

**Affected Industries and Sectors:**

The primary beneficiaries of this resolution are the oil and gas industries, which have significant interests in Wyoming's fossil fuel reserves. The BLM's original rule may have imposed stricter environmental standards or limited leasing opportunities, prompting industry pushback.

**Compliance Requirements and Timelines:**

By disapproving the BLM's rule, SJRES 89 would effectively eliminate any new compliance requirements or timelines associated with the original regulation. This move would allow fossil fuel operators to continue business as usual, without adhering to potentially more stringent environmental standards.

**Enforcement Mechanisms and Penalties:**

The resolution's passage would render the BLM's rule ineffective, eliminating any enforcement mechanisms or penalties associated with non-compliance. This lack of accountability would embolden industry actors to disregard environmental concerns, prioritizing profits over responsible resource management.

**Economic and Operational Impacts:**

SJRES 89's approval would likely have significant economic benefits for the fossil fuel industry, as operators would avoid costs associated with complying with new regulations. However, this move would also undermine efforts to address climate change, protect public lands, and ensure environmental sustainability.

**Monied Interests at Play:**

Senators Lummis and Barrasso have received substantial campaign contributions from the oil and gas industries. According to OpenSecrets.org, Senator Lummis has received over $200,000 in donations from the energy sector since 2015, while Senator Barrasso has received over $150,000 during the same period.

**Committee Capture:**

The Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, which discharged SJRES 89 by petition, has a history of being influenced by fossil fuel interests. The committee's chair, Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV), has been a vocal advocate for the oil and gas industry, and his state is a major producer of fossil fuels.

In conclusion, SJRES 89 is a brazen attempt to serve the interests of the fossil fuel industry at the expense of environmental protection. By disapproving the BLM's rule, this resolution would undermine efforts to address climate change, prioritize profits over public lands,