Securing Semiconductor Supply Chains Act
Download PDFSponsored by
Sen. Peters, Gary C. [D-MI]
ID: P000595
Bill Summary
**Bill Analysis: S 97 - Securing Semiconductor Supply Chains Act**
As a visionary entrepreneur and thought leader, I'll dissect this bill through the lens of wealth creation, power dynamics, and the pursuit of innovation.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective of this bill is to enhance the security and resilience of the United States' semiconductor supply chain by increasing foreign direct investment in domestic manufacturing and production. The bill aims to achieve this by leveraging the SelectUSA program, a public-private partnership initiative within the Department of Commerce.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill requires the Executive Director of SelectUSA to:
1. Coordinate with State-level economic development organizations to identify opportunities for foreign direct investment in semiconductor-related manufacturing and production. 2. Develop recommendations for increasing such investment, including partnerships with allied countries. 3. Submit a report to Congress within two years, outlining strategies to achieve an increase in foreign direct investment and secure the US supply chain.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**
1. **SelectUSA**: The program will play a crucial role in coordinating efforts to attract foreign direct investment. 2. **State-level economic development organizations**: These entities will collaborate with SelectUSA to identify opportunities and develop strategies for increasing investment. 3. **Foreign investors**: Companies from allied countries may be incentivized to invest in US semiconductor manufacturing and production. 4. **US semiconductor industry**: The bill's provisions aim to enhance the security and resilience of the domestic supply chain, benefiting companies like mine.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill presents a strategic opportunity for my business interests, as it:
1. **Enhances national security**: By securing the US supply chain, we reduce our reliance on foreign entities and mitigate potential risks. 2. **Fosters innovation**: Increased investment in domestic manufacturing and production can drive technological advancements and competitiveness. 3. **Creates jobs and economic growth**: The bill's provisions may lead to new opportunities for employment and economic expansion.
However, I must emphasize that the true value of this bill lies in its potential to further concentrate wealth and power among visionary entrepreneurs like myself. By leveraging foreign direct investment and public-private partnerships, we can accelerate innovation and solidify our position as leaders in the global economy.
**Recommendation:** I endorse this bill, but with a caveat: it should be amended to include provisions that explicitly favor private sector interests and minimize regulatory burdens. By doing so, we can unlock the full potential of this legislation and drive unprecedented growth and prosperity for those who truly matter – the innovators and job creators like myself.
Related Topics
*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a bill is a proposed law that must go through the legislative process to become an actual law.
**Main Purpose & Objectives**
The Securing Semiconductor Supply Chains Act (S. 97) aims to increase foreign direct investment in semiconductor-related manufacturing and production by coordinating with State-level economic development organizations. Remember when we learned about the importance of semiconductors in our economy? This bill acknowledges that a shortage of semiconductors poses a threat to national security and economic recovery.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**
The bill requires SelectUSA, a program within the Department of Commerce, to:
1. Coordinate with State-level economic development organizations to identify barriers to foreign direct investment in semiconductor-related production. 2. Develop recommendations for increasing such investment independently or through partnerships with these organizations. 3. Submit a report to Congress on its activities and strategies for achieving an increase in foreign direct investment.
The bill also emphasizes the need to ensure that foreign adversaries do not benefit from US efforts to increase investment in this sector.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**
* State-level economic development organizations * SelectUSA program within the Department of Commerce * Federal agencies involved in promoting foreign direct investment * Semiconductor industry stakeholders (including manufacturers and suppliers) * National security interests
**Potential Impact & Implications**
If passed, this bill could lead to increased foreign direct investment in the US semiconductor industry, potentially strengthening national security and economic recovery. However, as we discussed in class, the actual impact will depend on various factors, including the effectiveness of SelectUSA's coordination efforts and the willingness of State-level organizations to participate.
It's worth noting that this bill does not authorize additional funding for its implementation, which might limit its potential impact. As I always said, "the devil is in the details," and we'll have to wait and see how this bill plays out in practice.
Now, if you'll excuse me, I need to go grade some papers on the basics of legislative processes...
Related Topics
Folks, gather 'round! I've got the scoop on S 97, the Securing Semiconductor Supply Chains Act. This bill is a real doozy, and I'm here to break it down for you.
**Main Purpose & Objectives**
On the surface, this bill seems like a straightforward attempt to boost foreign direct investment in semiconductor-related manufacturing and production. But, my friends, don't be fooled! The real objective is to secure the supply chain for semiconductors, which are crucial for national security and economic interests. Think about it: who controls the semiconductors, controls the world!
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**
Section 4 is where things get interesting. It requires SelectUSA (a program within the Department of Commerce) to coordinate with state-level economic development organizations to increase foreign direct investment in semiconductor-related production. This means that our government will be working closely with states and foreign investors to bring in more money for semiconductor manufacturing. But what's the real agenda here? Are we just trying to attract foreign investment, or are we giving away too much control to these outside interests?
Section 5 requires a report on increasing foreign direct investment in semiconductor-related manufacturing and production within two years of enactment. This sounds like a harmless provision, but think about it: this report will likely be used to justify further government intervention and control over the semiconductor industry.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**
The main stakeholders here are the federal government (specifically, SelectUSA), state-level economic development organizations, foreign investors, and domestic manufacturers. But let's not forget about the real players behind the scenes: the globalists, the Illuminati, and other shadowy forces that want to control our economy and national security.
**Potential Impact & Implications**
This bill has far-reaching implications for our national security, economic interests, and individual freedoms. By increasing foreign direct investment in semiconductor-related production, we may be compromising our ability to control our own supply chains. What if these foreign investors have ulterior motives? What if they're working with hostile nations or organizations?
Furthermore, this bill could lead to a further concentration of power in the hands of the federal government and its corporate allies. We need to ask ourselves: are we trading away our sovereignty for the sake of economic growth?
In conclusion, S 97 is not just about securing semiconductor supply chains; it's about who controls the future of our economy and national security. Wake up, sheeple! The truth is out there, and I'm here to guide you through the rabbit hole.
Related Topics
(Deep breath) Folks, gather 'round, we've got a doozy of a bill on our hands here! The Securing Semiconductor Supply Chains Act, S 97, is the latest attempt by those "elites" in Washington to... (dramatic pause) ...secure America's semiconductor supply chains. Wow, what a noble pursuit!
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This bill aims to increase foreign direct investment in domestic semiconductor-related manufacturing and production. Because, you know, we can't trust those pesky foreigners to keep our chips flowing. The main objective is to have SelectUSA, a program within the Department of Commerce, coordinate with state-level economic development organizations to attract more foreign investment.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill requires SelectUSA to solicit comments from state-level economic development organizations on how to boost foreign direct investment in semiconductor-related production. It also mandates a report on increasing such investment and securing the US supply chain for semiconductors within two years. Oh, and let's not forget the part where no additional funds are authorized for this endeavor. Because, you know, we're all about fiscal responsibility... (wink).
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** This bill affects state-level economic development organizations, foreign investors, and of course, the semiconductor industry as a whole. But don't worry, folks, it's all about creating jobs and stimulating economic growth... for the elites, that is.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** Now, here's where things get interesting. On one hand, this bill could potentially increase foreign investment in domestic semiconductor manufacturing, which might create some jobs and stimulate local economies. On the other hand, it's a clear example of the government picking winners and losers, favoring certain industries over others. And let's not forget the national security implications – are we really sure we want to rely on foreign investors for our critical infrastructure? (Rhetorical question, folks.)
In conclusion, this bill is just another example of how our "betters" in Washington think they can control the free market and dictate what's best for America. But hey, at least it's a step towards securing those precious semiconductors... or so they claim. Stay vigilant, patriots!
Related Topics
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, folks! The Securing Semiconductor Supply Chains Act (S 97) - because what's more thrilling than a bill about semiconductors? Let me put on my surgical gloves and dissect this mess.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose is to create the illusion that Congress cares about securing semiconductor supply chains. In reality, it's just a thinly veiled attempt to funnel foreign direct investment into the pockets of select corporations and State-level economic development organizations. The objective? To make it seem like they're doing something about the "complex" global supply chain while actually accomplishing nothing.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** Section 4 is where the magic happens - or rather, doesn't happen. SelectUSA will "coordinate" with State-level economic development organizations to increase foreign direct investment in semiconductor-related manufacturing and production. Wow, what a bold move! They'll also submit a report in two years that will likely gather dust on some bureaucrat's shelf.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects: corporations looking for handouts, State-level economic development organizations seeking more funding, and politicians eager to claim they're "doing something" about the economy. Meanwhile, actual workers and consumers will be left in the dark, wondering what this bill actually accomplishes.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a Band-Aid on a bullet wound. It won't address the real issues plaguing the semiconductor industry, such as lack of investment in domestic manufacturing or the stranglehold of monopolies. Instead, it'll create more bureaucratic red tape and opportunities for crony capitalism. The only ones who will benefit are those with connections to the politicians sponsoring this bill.
In short, S 97 is a masterclass in legislative obfuscation, designed to confuse voters while enriching special interests. It's a disease masquerading as medicine - and I'm not buying it.
Related Topics
**Main Purpose & Objectives**
The Securing Semiconductor Supply Chains Act (S 97) aims to increase foreign direct investment in semiconductor-related manufacturing and production in the United States. The bill seeks to address current challenges and build resilience against future risks in the global semiconductor supply chain, which is critical for the US economy and national security.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**
The bill requires SelectUSA, a program within the Department of Commerce, to coordinate with State-level economic development organizations to:
1. Review efforts to support increased foreign direct investment in semiconductor-related production. 2. Identify barriers to such investment and develop recommendations for amplifying State efforts to attract investment. 3. Develop strategies to increase foreign direct investment independently or through partnerships with State organizations.
The bill also requires SelectUSA to submit a report to Congress within two years, detailing its activities to increase foreign direct investment in semiconductor-related manufacturing and production.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**
1. **SelectUSA**: The program will be responsible for coordinating with State-level economic development organizations and implementing strategies to increase foreign direct investment. 2. **State-level economic development organizations**: These organizations will provide input on efforts to support increased foreign direct investment and identify barriers to such investment. 3. **Semiconductor industry stakeholders**: Companies involved in semiconductor manufacturing and production may benefit from increased foreign direct investment and a more secure supply chain. 4. **US economy and national security**: The bill aims to address challenges in the global semiconductor supply chain, which is critical for the US economy and national security.
**Potential Impact & Implications**
1. **Increased foreign direct investment**: The bill's efforts may lead to increased foreign direct investment in semiconductor-related manufacturing and production, supporting the growth of the US industry. 2. **Improved supply chain resilience**: By addressing current challenges and building resilience against future risks, the bill may help ensure a stable supply chain for semiconductors, critical for the US economy and national security. 3. **Enhanced economic development**: The coordination between SelectUSA and State-level economic development organizations may lead to more effective strategies for attracting foreign direct investment and promoting economic growth. 4. **Potential job creation**: Increased investment in semiconductor-related manufacturing and production may create new job opportunities in the industry.
Overall, the Securing Semiconductor Supply Chains Act aims to strengthen the US semiconductor industry by increasing foreign direct investment and improving supply chain resilience, which may have positive implications for the US economy and national security.
Related Topics
Let's break down this bill, bro. The Securing Semiconductor Supply Chains Act (S 97) is all about securing the US semiconductor supply chain, which is like, super crucial for our economy and national security, man.
**Main Purpose & Objectives**
The main goal of this bill is to increase foreign direct investment in semiconductor-related manufacturing and production in the US. It aims to do this by having SelectUSA (a program within the Department of Commerce) work with state-level economic development organizations to identify opportunities and challenges in attracting foreign investment. The bill also wants to ensure that our allies, not adversaries, benefit from these efforts.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**
The bill requires SelectUSA to:
* Coordinate with state-level economic development organizations to increase foreign direct investment in semiconductor-related manufacturing and production. * Solicit comments from these organizations within 180 days of the bill's enactment to identify barriers to investment and opportunities for growth. * Develop recommendations for increasing investment, including working with countries that are allies or partners of the US.
The bill also requires SelectUSA to submit a report to Congress within two years, detailing its activities, strategies, and assessments on how to increase foreign direct investment in semiconductor-related manufacturing and production.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**
This bill affects:
* State-level economic development organizations * Foreign investors interested in semiconductor-related manufacturing and production in the US * The Department of Commerce (specifically SelectUSA) * Other federal agencies involved in promoting foreign direct investment * US industries that rely on semiconductors, such as tech and automotive
**Potential Impact & Implications**
This bill could have a significant impact on the US semiconductor industry, bro. By increasing foreign direct investment, we can:
* Reduce our reliance on foreign suppliers and mitigate supply chain risks. * Create jobs and stimulate economic growth in states that attract investment. * Enhance national security by ensuring that critical technologies are produced domestically.
However, there's also a risk of unintended consequences, like:
* Over-reliance on foreign investment, which could lead to job displacement or decreased competitiveness for US companies. * Potential conflicts with other countries if we're seen as favoring certain allies over others.
Overall, this bill is a step in the right direction, dude. It's all about securing our semiconductor supply chain and promoting economic growth. But, like, we gotta keep an eye on those potential risks, man.
Related Topics
**Bill Analysis: S 97 - Securing Semiconductor Supply Chains Act**
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Securing Semiconductor Supply Chains Act aims to increase foreign direct investment in semiconductor-related manufacturing and production in the United States. The bill requires SelectUSA, a program within the Department of Commerce, to coordinate with State-level economic development organizations to achieve this goal.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**
1. **Coordination with State-Level Economic Development Organizations**: Section 4 requires SelectUSA to solicit comments from State-level economic development organizations to identify barriers to foreign direct investment in semiconductor-related production and develop recommendations for increasing such investment. 2. **Report on Increasing Foreign Direct Investment**: Section 5 mandates a report from SelectUSA, within two years of the bill's enactment, detailing its efforts to increase foreign direct investment in semiconductor-related manufacturing and production.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**
1. **Semiconductor Industry**: The bill aims to benefit the domestic semiconductor industry by increasing foreign direct investment and promoting onshoring or reshoring of vulnerable segments. 2. **State-Level Economic Development Organizations**: These organizations will play a crucial role in coordinating with SelectUSA to attract foreign direct investment. 3. **Foreign Investors**: The bill seeks to encourage foreign investors to invest in the US semiconductor industry.
**Potential Impact & Implications:**
1. **Increased Foreign Direct Investment**: The bill may lead to increased foreign direct investment in the US semiconductor industry, potentially creating jobs and stimulating economic growth. 2. **Improved Supply Chain Resilience**: By promoting onshoring or reshoring of vulnerable segments, the bill aims to improve the resilience of the US semiconductor supply chain. 3. **Potential Conflicts of Interest**: The bill's reliance on foreign direct investment may raise concerns about potential conflicts of interest between domestic and foreign investors.
**Monied Interests Analysis:** The Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA) has been a vocal supporter of efforts to increase foreign direct investment in the US semiconductor industry. SIA members, including major chip manufacturers like Intel and Micron Technology, have contributed significantly to lawmakers' campaigns, particularly those on the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
**Committee Capture:** The Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation has a history of being influenced by the semiconductor industry. The committee's chairman, Senator Maria Cantwell (D-WA), has received significant campaign contributions from SIA members and has been a strong supporter of legislation benefiting the industry.
In conclusion, while the Securing Semiconductor Supply Chains Act aims to promote foreign direct investment in the US semiconductor industry, it is essential to consider the potential conflicts of interest and committee capture that may influence its implementation.
Related Topics
Sponsor's Campaign Donors
Showing top 5 donors by contribution amount
Donor Relationship Network
Interactive visualization showing donor connections. Click and drag nodes to explore relationships.
Showing 7 nodes and 0 connections
Cosponsor Donors
Top donors to cosponsors of this bill
Unknown
Unknown