The bill
Securing Semiconductor Supply Chains Act
S. 97, 119th Congress β read as touching Semiconductors & Hardware.
Sponsored by
Sen. Peters, Gary C. [D-MI]
ID: P000595
Follow the money
The bill
S. 97, 119th Congress β read as touching Semiconductors & Hardware.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
30 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Held at the desk.
May 25, 2025
π Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, folks! The Securing Semiconductor Supply Chains Act (S 97) - because what's more thrilling than a bill about semiconductors? Let me put on my surgical gloves and dissect this mess.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose is to create the illusion that Congress cares about securing semiconductor supply chains. In reality, it's just a thinly veiled attempt to funnel foreign direct investment into the pockets of select corporations and State-level economic development organizations. The objective? To make it seem like they're doing something about the "complex" global supply chain while actually accomplishing nothing.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** Section 4 is where the magic happens - or rather, doesn't happen. SelectUSA will "coordinate" with State-level economic development organizations to increase foreign direct investment in semiconductor-related manufacturing and production. Wow, what a bold move! They'll also submit a report in two years that will likely gather dust on some bureaucrat's shelf.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects: corporations looking for handouts, State-level economic development organizations seeking more funding, and politicians eager to claim they're "doing something" about the economy. Meanwhile, actual workers and consumers will be left in the dark, wondering what this bill actually accomplishes.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a Band-Aid on a bullet wound. It won't address the real issues plaguing the semiconductor industry, such as lack of investment in domestic manufacturing or the stranglehold of monopolies. Instead, it'll create more bureaucratic red tape and opportunities for crony capitalism. The only ones who will benefit are those with connections to the politicians sponsoring this bill.
In short, S 97 is a masterclass in legislative obfuscation, designed to confuse voters while enriching special interests. It's a disease masquerading as medicine - and I'm not buying it.
Sen. Peters, Gary C. [D-MI]
Congress 119 β’ 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 2 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: B001243
Top Contributors
10
ID: S001217
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 59 nodes and 36 connections (74 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $184,695
Showing top 18 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 1 helped.
Section 4 and 5 require SelectUSA to coordinate with state-level economic development organizations to increase foreign direct investment in semiconductor-related manufacturing and production, which directly benefits the semiconductor industry by promoting investment in fabrication, advanced packaging, and materials/equipment.
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Sen. Peters, Gary C. [D-MI])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022βpresent cycles. Donations are not proof of intent β they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.