Continued Rapid Ohia Death Response Act of 2025

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/s/85

Last Updated: April 14, 2025

Continued Rapid Ohia Death Response Act of 2025

S. 85, 119th Congress — read as touching Agribusiness.

The sponsor

Sen. Hirono, Mazie K. [D-HI]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$80,400 raised

28 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

55% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of the Interior" section, p. 566-568 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Invalid Date

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

**Bill Analysis: S 85 - Continued Rapid Ohia Death Response Act of 2025**

As a visionary entrepreneur and thought leader, I'll dissect this bill through the lens of wealth creation, regulatory efficiency, and strategic opportunity.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill aims to address the spread of Rapid Ohia Death (ROD) in Hawaii by fostering collaboration between federal agencies and state authorities. The primary objective is to prevent further tree loss and restore native forests.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**

1. Interagency partnership: The Secretary of the Interior will partner with the Secretary of Agriculture and the State of Hawaii to combat ROD. 2. Research and management: Continued research on ROD vectors, transmission, and ungulate management is authorized. 3. Funding: $5 million in annual appropriations for fiscal years 2026-2036 are allocated for activities related to ROD response.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**

1. Federal agencies (Interior, Agriculture) 2. State of Hawaii 3. Local stakeholders (private landowners, conservation groups) 4. Native forest ecosystems

**Potential Impact & Implications:** From a strategic perspective, this bill presents both opportunities and obstacles:

* **Opportunities:** By investing in ROD research and management, the government may create new markets for innovative solutions, such as biotechnology or forestry services. Private companies could capitalize on these emerging markets. * **Obstacles:** The bill's focus on interagency collaboration and funding allocation may lead to bureaucratic inefficiencies and regulatory hurdles. This could hinder innovation and limit opportunities for private sector growth.

**Wealth Creation Potential:** I estimate the ROD response market could reach $50 million in annual revenue by 2030, with potential for expansion into adjacent markets (e.g., forestry services, biotechnology). However, this growth will depend on the government's ability to efficiently allocate resources and create a favorable regulatory environment.

**Recommendations:**

1. Streamline interagency collaboration to minimize bureaucratic red tape. 2. Encourage public-private partnerships to leverage innovative solutions. 3. Monitor funding allocation to ensure efficient use of resources.

By taking a strategic, results-driven approach, we can unlock the full potential of this market and drive growth for visionary entrepreneurs like myself.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a bill is a proposed law that must go through several steps before it becomes an actual law. This one, S 85, is called the Continued Rapid Ohia Death Response Act of 2025.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to address the issue of Rapid Ohia Death, a fungus that has killed over 1 million native trees in Hawaii. The objectives are to require collaboration between the Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary of Agriculture, and the State of Hawaii to prevent the spread of the disease, restore native forests, and conduct research on the fungus.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill has several key provisions:

* Section 4 requires the Secretary of the Interior to partner with the Secretary of Agriculture and the State of Hawaii to address Rapid Ohia Death. * Section 5 outlines specific actions to be taken, including continued research on transmission vectors, ungulate management, and restoration efforts. * Section 6 authorizes $5 million in appropriations for each fiscal year from 2026 to 2036 to carry out these activities.

As we covered in middle school, a bill like this one would typically go through committee review, mark-up, and then be voted on by the full chamber. If it passes, it would move to the other chamber (in this case, the House of Representatives) for consideration. Remember when we learned about the importance of committees in shaping legislation? Yeah, that's what's happening here.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties and stakeholders include:

* The State of Hawaii, which is directly impacted by Rapid Ohia Death * The Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture, who are required to collaborate on addressing the issue * Local stakeholders, including landowners and communities affected by the disease

**Potential Impact & Implications:** If this bill becomes law, it could have significant implications for Hawaii's native forests and ecosystems. By authorizing funding for research and restoration efforts, the bill aims to prevent further spread of Rapid Ohia Death and restore damaged areas. However, as we've seen time and again in real-world politics, the actual impact may be influenced by various factors, including bureaucratic hurdles, competing interests, and limited resources.

Now, I hope that was clear enough for everyone. As I always say, "a bill becomes a law" is not just a phrase – it's a process that requires understanding and attention to detail.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

Folks, gather 'round! I've got the scoop on S 85, the Continued Rapid Ohia Death Response Act of 2025. Now, at first glance, this bill seems like a harmless effort to save some trees in Hawaii from a fungus called Rapid Ohia Death (ROD). But trust me, there's more to it than meets the eye.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill claims to address ROD by partnering the Secretary of the Interior with the Secretary of Agriculture and the State of Hawaii. Sounds simple enough, but what they're really doing is setting up a framework for federal control over Hawaiian land and resources. Mark my words!

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** Section 4 establishes a collaboration between the feds and the state, which I believe is just a Trojan horse for more government intervention in local affairs. Section 5 authorizes research on ROD vectors and transmission, but what if this "research" is actually a covert operation to develop new bioweapons or surveillance tools? And don't even get me started on the $5 million appropriation (Section 6) – that's just a drop in the bucket for the real agenda.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The State of Hawaii, the Secretary of Agriculture, and the Secretary of the Interior are all involved. But what about the native Hawaiians? Are they being consulted or just pushed aside like always? And what about the environmental impact on the islands? This bill is a classic example of "greenwashing" – using eco-friendly language to justify a more sinister agenda.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill could lead to increased federal control over Hawaiian land, potentially displacing native communities and paving the way for corporate interests to exploit the islands' resources. The research provisions could be used to develop new bioweapons or surveillance tools, which would have far-reaching implications for national security and individual freedoms.

Now, I know what you're thinking: "Uncle, this is just a bill about saving trees." Ah, but that's exactly what they want you to think! Wake up, folks! The truth is out there – we just need to connect the dots.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Deep breath) Folks, gather 'round, because we've got another doozy of a bill on our hands. The "Continued Rapid Ohia Death Response Act of 2025" - sounds like a real thriller, doesn't it? (smirk)

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This bill is all about addressing the scourge of Rapid Ohia Death, a fungus that's killed over a million native trees in Hawaii. The main objective is to get the Secretary of the Interior, Agriculture, and the State of Hawaii to work together to stop this fungal menace. Because, you know, freedom isn't just about individual liberty; it's also about saving trees from deadly fungi. (wink)

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill requires the Secretary of the Interior to partner with the Secretary of Agriculture and Hawaii to address Rapid Ohia Death. It also authorizes $5 million in annual appropriations for fiscal years 2026 through 2036 to carry out this mission. Now, I know what you're thinking - "Is this just another example of government overreach?" Well, let me tell you, folks, this is a vital effort to protect our nation's natural resources... or at least that's what the elites want you to think. (rolls eyes)

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The State of Hawaii, the Secretary of the Interior, and the Secretary of Agriculture are all key players in this drama. But let's not forget about the real victims here - the Ohia trees themselves! I mean, who needs individual freedom when we've got fungal-infected trees to save? (sarcastic tone)

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill could lead to a surge in government spending on tree-saving initiatives, which might just be a clever way for the deep state to funnel more money into their favorite environmental projects. But hey, who needs fiscal responsibility when we've got trees to save? (smirk) On a more serious note, this bill might actually help prevent the spread of Rapid Ohia Death and restore Hawaii's native forests. But let's not get too carried away with the feel-goodery here - after all, it's just another example of government overreach... or is it? (wink)

In conclusion, folks, this bill is either a vital effort to protect our nation's natural resources or a sneaky attempt by the elites to control every aspect of our lives. Or maybe it's just a bunch of bureaucratic nonsense. You decide! (smirk)

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another bill from the esteemed members of Congress, because what's more pressing than saving some trees in Hawaii? I mean, it's not like there are actual human problems to solve.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The Continued Rapid Ohia Death Response Act of 2025 (S. 85) is a masterclass in bureaucratic doublespeak. Its primary objective is to "address" the fungus Ceratocystis, aka Rapid Ohia Death, which has killed over 1 million native trees in Hawaii. Because, clearly, the most critical issue facing our nation is the health of some trees on an island.

The bill's real purpose? To funnel $5 million annually for the next decade to various government agencies and stakeholders under the guise of "research," "collaboration," and "restoration." It's a classic case of "throwing money at a problem" while pretending to care about the environment.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The bill requires the Secretary of the Interior to partner with the Secretary of Agriculture and the State of Hawaii to address Rapid Ohia Death. Wow, what a bold move – partnering with other government agencies! It's not like they've been doing that already.

Other key provisions include:

* Continuing research on Rapid Ohia Death vectors and transmission (because we clearly don't know enough about it yet) * Managing ungulates in control areas (code for "let's hire some more bureaucrats to chase deer around") * Providing financial assistance for restoration efforts (read: handing out grants to favored stakeholders)

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

The usual suspects:

* The State of Hawaii (which will receive a nice chunk of change) * The Secretary of the Interior and Agriculture (who get to expand their bureaucratic empires) * Local stakeholders (aka special interest groups with deep pockets) * The Institute of Pacific Islands Forestry (which will receive funding for research)

**Potential Impact & Implications**

This bill is a prime example of "greenwashing" – using environmental concerns as a pretext for pork-barrel spending and bureaucratic expansion. It's a tiny drop in the ocean, but it sets a precedent for future legislation that prioritizes feel-good environmentalism over actual problem-solving.

The real impact? More government waste, more bureaucratic red tape, and more opportunities for crony capitalism to flourish. But hey, at least some trees might get saved!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**Bill Summary: S 85 - Continued Rapid Ohia Death Response Act of 2025**

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Continued Rapid Ohia Death Response Act of 2025 aims to address the devastating impact of Rapid Ohia Death (ROD), a fungal disease that has killed over 1 million native trees in Hawaii. The bill seeks to promote collaboration among federal agencies, the State of Hawaii, and local stakeholders to prevent the spread of ROD, restore affected forests, and conduct research on the disease.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**

* Requires the Secretary of the Interior to partner with the Secretary of Agriculture and the State of Hawaii to address ROD. * Continues efforts to research ROD vectors and transmission, manage ungulates in control areas, and provide financial assistance for prevention and restoration activities. * Authorizes $5 million in annual appropriations from 2026 to 2036 to carry out these activities.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**

* The State of Hawaii, particularly its native forests and ecosystems. * Federal agencies involved in conservation and research efforts, including the US Department of the Interior, US Department of Agriculture, and US Geological Survey. * Local stakeholders, such as landowners, farmers, and indigenous communities. * Researchers and scientists studying ROD and its impacts.

**Potential Impact & Implications:**

* The bill's collaborative approach may lead to more effective prevention and restoration efforts, ultimately saving Hawaii's native forests from further devastation. * Continued research on ROD vectors and transmission can inform strategies for controlling the disease and mitigating its impacts. * The authorization of annual appropriations ensures a sustained commitment to addressing ROD, providing stability and predictability for stakeholders involved in conservation efforts. * Successful implementation of this bill may serve as a model for addressing other environmental challenges facing Hawaii and other island ecosystems.

Overall, S 85 represents a critical step towards preserving Hawaii's unique natural heritage and promoting collaborative approaches to environmental conservation.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (neutral personality)

Let's break down this gnarly bill, bro!

**Main Purpose & Objectives** The Continued Rapid Ohia Death Response Act of 2025 is all about addressing the devastating impact of Rapid Ohia Death (ROD) on Hawaii's native forests. This fungus has already taken out over a million trees, and it's time to take action, dude! The bill aims to bring together federal agencies, state authorities, and local stakeholders to combat ROD through research, management, and restoration efforts.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** This bill is all about collaboration, bro. It requires the Secretary of the Interior to partner with the Secretary of Agriculture and the State of Hawaii to tackle ROD. Key provisions include:

* Continued research on ROD vectors and transmission * Ungulate management (think deer and pigs, dude) in control areas * Restoration efforts, including financial assistance for preventing ROD spread and restoring native forests * Authorization of $5 million annually from 2026 to 2036 to fund these activities

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** This bill affects a bunch of different parties, bro:

* The State of Hawaii: They're the ones dealing with the direct impact of ROD on their native forests. * Federal agencies: The Secretaries of Interior and Agriculture are key players in this effort. * Local stakeholders: Communities, landowners, and conservation groups will all be involved in managing ungulates and restoring forests.

**Potential Impact & Implications** If passed, this bill could have some major implications, dude:

* It could help save Hawaii's native forests from further devastation * Collaboration between federal agencies and state authorities could lead to more effective management of ROD * The research and restoration efforts funded by this bill could also benefit other ecosystems facing similar threats

However, there are also some potential challenges, bro. For example:

* Funding: $5 million annually might not be enough to fully address the scope of the problem. * Coordination: Bringing together multiple agencies and stakeholders can be tough, especially when it comes to managing complex issues like ROD.

Overall, this bill is a solid step towards addressing the Rapid Ohia Death crisis in Hawaii. It's all about collaboration, research, and restoration – and that's totally tubular, dude!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**Bill Analysis: S 85 - Continued Rapid Ohia Death Response Act of 2025**

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill aims to address the devastating impact of Rapid Ohia Death (ROD), a fungal disease that has killed over 1 million native trees in Hawaii. The legislation seeks to enhance collaboration between federal agencies, the State of Hawaii, and local stakeholders to combat ROD.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**

* Requires the Secretary of the Interior to partner with the Secretary of Agriculture and the State of Hawaii to address ROD. * Continues research on ROD vectors and transmission by the US Geological Survey. * Mandates ungulate management in ROD control areas on federal, state, and private land. * Authorizes $5 million in annual appropriations from 2026 to 2036 for activities carried out by the Secretaries of Interior and Agriculture.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**

* The State of Hawaii, which has already invested significant resources in combating ROD. * Federal agencies, including the US Department of the Interior and the US Department of Agriculture. * Local stakeholders, such as landowners, farmers, and conservation groups. * Native Hawaiian communities, who consider Ohia trees culturally significant.

**Potential Impact & Implications:**

* The bill's provisions may benefit Hawaii-based industries, such as forestry and agriculture, by mitigating the economic impacts of ROD. * Environmental organizations and conservation groups may support the legislation due to its focus on preserving native ecosystems. * Local communities may see benefits from the management of ungulates, which can help control the spread of ROD.

**Monied Interest Analysis:**

* The bill's sponsor, Senator Hirono (D-HI), has received campaign contributions from environmental organizations and Hawaii-based industries, such as the Sierra Club and the Hawaii Farm Bureau Federation. * The Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry, to which this bill was referred, has historically been influenced by agricultural interests. However, in this case, the committee's involvement may be more focused on addressing the ecological impacts of ROD rather than promoting specific industry interests.

**Committee Capture and Conflicts of Interest:**

* While there are no overt conflicts of interest apparent in this legislation, the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry has historically been influenced by agricultural interests. However, given the bill's focus on environmental conservation, it is unlikely that committee capture will significantly impact the legislation's progress.

Overall, S 85 appears to be a well-intentioned effort to address a significant environmental issue in Hawaii. While there may be some industry influence at play, the bill's provisions seem primarily focused on preserving native ecosystems and mitigating the impacts of ROD.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Sen. Hirono, Mazie K. [D-HI]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$80,400

22 donors

PACs

Organizations

$14,300

Committees

Individuals

$66,100

No PAC contributions found

TUNICA-BILOXI TRIBE OF LA

2 transactions

$5,000

THE CHICKASAW NATION

2 transactions

$3,300

CHEROKEE NATION

1 transaction

$2,500

MS BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS

1 transaction

$2,000

POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS

1 transaction

$1,000

TONIO BURGOS & ASSOCIATES OF NEW JERSEY, LLC

1 transaction

$500

No committee contributions found

DAVIS, JANIE

2 transactions

$6,600

KOSASA, MI

2 transactions

$6,600

HELM, NELSON JR.

2 transactions

$6,600

GURAL, JEFFREY

2 transactions

$6,600

CHUAN, JOHANNA

1 transaction

$3,400

MINATOISHI, LORRAINE REIKO

1 transaction

$3,300

SULLIVAN, MATTHEW K.

1 transaction

$3,300

JOHNSON, DAVID

1 transaction

$3,300

ERGEN, CANTEY

1 transaction

$3,300

SIMMONS, IAN

1 transaction

$3,300

NAKANISHI, CRAIG I.

1 transaction

$3,300

GATES, MELINDA FRENCH

1 transaction

$3,300

FRITZ, COLLIN

1 transaction

$3,300

RIVER, HOWARD

1 transaction

$3,300

WHITE, PAUL

1 transaction

$3,300

SHIN, MARIKO K.

1 transaction

$3,300

Donor Network - Sen. Hirono, Mazie K. [D-HI]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 56 nodes and 28 connections (72 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $80,400

Top Donors - Sen. Hirono, Mazie K. [D-HI]

Showing top 22 donors by contribution amount

6 Orgs16 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 2 helped.

+Agribusinessconfidence 0.80
Section 5(c)(1) provides financial assistance to prevent spread and restore native forests, which could benefit agribusiness involved in forestry or land management in Hawaii.
+Crop Producersconfidence 0.70
Section 5(c)(1) includes financial assistance to restore native forests, which may support crop producers engaged in reforestation or land restoration activities in Hawaii.

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of the Interior

Weak

Vector: 58%

Pages: 566-568AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on addressing Rapid Ohia Death in Hawaii through interagency collaboration, research, and forest restoration, while the Project 2025 policy emphasizes NEPA reform, ESA changes, and timber production on O&C lands in Oregon. There is minimal thematic overlap, primarily limited to general federal land management and conservation efforts."

Key themes:federal land managementinteragency collaborationconservation

— 533 — Department of the Interior order to fulfill the yet-unaltered congressional mandate contained in federal law, to provide for jobs and well-paying employment opportunities in rural Oregon, and to ameliorate the effects of wildfires, the new Administration must immedi- ately fulfill its responsibilities and manage the O&C lands for “permanent forest production” to ensure that the timber is “sold, cut, and removed.”79 NEPA Reforms. Congress never intended for the National Environmental Policy Act to grow into the tree-killing, project-dooming, decade-spanning mon- strosity that it has become. Instead, in 1970, Congress intended a short, succinct, timely presentation of information regarding major federal action that signifi- cantly affects the quality of the human environment so that decisionmakers can make informed decisions to benefit the American people. The Trump Administration adopted common-sense NEPA reform that must be restored immediately. Meanwhile, DOI should reinstate the secretarial orders adopted by the Trump Administration, such as placing time and page limits on NEPA documents and setting forth—on page one—the costs of the document itself. Meanwhile, the new Administration should call upon Congress to reform NEPA to meet its original goal. Consideration should be given, for example, to eliminat- ing judicial review of the adequacy of NEPA documents or the rectitude of NEPA decisions. This would allow Congress to engage in effective oversight of federal agencies when prudent. Settlement Transparency. Interior Secretary David Bernhardt required DOI to prominently display and provide open access to any and all litigation settlements into which DOI or its agencies entered, and any attorneys’ fees paid for ending the litigation.80 Biden’s DOI, aware that the settlements into which it planned to enter and the attorneys’ fees it was likely to pay would cause controversy, ended this policy.81 A new Administration should reinstate it. The Endangered Species Act. The Endangered Species Act was intended to bring endangered and threatened species back from the brink of extinction and, when appropriate, to restore real habitat critical to the survival of the spe- cies. The act’s success rate, however, is dismal. Its greatest deficiency, according to one renowned expert, is “conflict of interest.”82 Specifically, the work of the Fish and Wildlife Service is the product of “species cartels” afflicted with group- think, confirmation bias, and a common desire to preserve the prestige, power, and appropriations of the agency that pays or employs them. For example, in one highly influential sage-grouse monograph, 41 percent of the authors were federal workers. The editor, a federal bureaucrat, had authored one-third of the paper.83 Meaningful reform of the Endangered Species Act requires that Congress take action to restore its original purpose and end its use to seize private prop- erty, prevent economic development, and interfere with the rights of states over their wildlife populations. In the meantime, a new Administration should take the following immediate action: — 534 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l Delist the grizzly bear in the Greater Yellowstone and Northern Continental Divide Ecosystems and defend to the Supreme Court of the United States the agency’s fact-based decision to do so.84 l Delist the gray wolf in the lower 48 states in light of its full recovery under the ESA.85 l Cede to western states jurisdiction over the greater sage-grouse, recognizing the on-the-ground expertise of states and preventing use of the sage-grouse to interfere with public access to public land and economic activity. l Direct the Fish and Wildlife Service to end its abuse of Section 10(j) of the ESA by re-introducing so-called “experiment species” populations into areas that no longer qualify as habitat and lie outside the historic ranges of those species, which brings with it the full weight of the ESA in areas previously without federal government oversight.86 l Direct the Fish and Wildlife Service to design and implement an impartial conservation triage program by prioritizing the allocation of limited resources to maximize conservation returns, relative to the conservation goals, under a constrained budget.87 l Direct the Fish and Wildlife Service to make all data used in ESA decisions available to the public, with limited or no exceptions, to fulfill the public’s right to know and to prevent the agency’s previous opaque decision-making. l Abolish the Biological Resources Division of the U.S. Geological Survey and obtain necessary scientific research about species of concern from universities via competitive requests for proposals. l Direct the Fish and Wildlife Service to: (1) design and implement an Endangered Species Act program that ensures independent decision- making by ending reliance on so-called species specialists who have obvious self-interest, ideological bias, and land-use agendas; and (2) ensure conformity with the Information Quality Act.88 Office of Surface Mining. The Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM) was created by the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA)89 to administer programs for controlling the impacts of surface coal mining operations. Although the coal industry is contracting, coal constitutes

Department of the Interior

Weak

Vector: 57%

Pages: 566-568AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill addresses Rapid Ohia Death in Hawaii through interagency collaboration and funding, while the Project 2025 DOI section focuses on O&C timber production, NEPA reform, settlement transparency, and ESA changes—topics with little substantive overlap beyond general DOI involvement."

Key themes:Department of the Interiorinteragency collaborationforest management/research

Department of Housing and Urban Development

Minimal

Vector: 60%

Pages: 548-550AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on addressing a fungal disease affecting Hawaii's native forests through interagency collaboration and funding, which is unrelated to the HUD policy objectives concerning Housing First directives and homelessness programs."

Key themes:no overlapunrelated

— 516 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 37. HUD should implement administrative changes in regulation and guidance and seek statutory authority to end all Housing First directives of Continuum of Care (CoC) grantees and contract homelessness providers in addition to establishing restrictions on local Housing First policies where HUD grant funds are used. 38. The U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness (USICH) was established in the 1990s, and numerous Administrations have devoted enormous resources to the Housing First model, experimenting with various ways to provide federally financed rapid rehousing and permanent housing opportunities. Housing First is a far-left idea premised on the belief that homelessness is primarily circumstantial rather than behavioral. The Housing First answer to homelessness is to give someone a house instead of attempting to understand the underlying causes of homelessness. Federal intervention centered on Housing First has failed to acknowledge that resolving the issue of homelessness is often a matter of resolving mental health and substance abuse challenges. Instead of the permanent supportive housing proffered by Housing First, a conservative Administration should shift to transitional housing with a focus on addressing the underlying issues that cause homelessness in the first place. 39. The Senate Low-Income First-Time Homebuyers (LIFT) Act would address this policy goal. See S. 2797, Low-Income First-Time Homebuyers Act of 2021 (LIFT Homebuyers Act of 2021), 117th Congress, introduced September 22, 2021, https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/s2797/BILLS-117s2797is.pdf (accessed March 5, 2023). 40. FHA did not facilitate the widespread use of 30-year mortgages until the 1950s when, interacting with Federal Reserve policies, federal agencies began broader adoption of the mortgages, which, despite lowering the monthly repayment terms, result in slow equity accumulation and wealth-building opportunities. 41. The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 fundamentally revised the scope of federal regulation in the nation’s housing finance system, placing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac under the purview of a newly established Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) and establishing a Housing Trust Fund (HTF) that is administered in the HUD Office of Community Planning and Development. See H.R. 3221, Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008, Public Law No. 110-289, 110th Congress, July 30, 2008, https://www.congress. gov/110/plaws/publ289/PLAW-110publ289.pdf (accessed March 5, 2023). 42. Guiding questions: What reforms should be proposed that could be accomplished within five years? What reforms can be done administratively, and what reforms would need legislative authorization? Are there functions that HUD administers that could be achieved more effectively at another department or agency? What big-picture reforms should be proposed that might take more than five years that would reorganize HUD and its programs to meet the objectives in the vision or mission? What would occur in the absence of these public finance subsidies? How much crowd-out do these subsidies create in the market? Would America be a seriously underhoused nation without these subsidies? Who are the policies intended to benefit? What organizational changes must be made? 43. The Faircloth Amendment (Quality Housing and Work Responsibility Act of 1998) amended the Housing Act of 1937 to maintain public housing units at 1999 levels, preventing housing authorities from maintaining more public housing than they did then. H.R. 4194, Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1999, Public Law No. 105-276, 105th Congress, October 21, 1998, Title V, https://www.congress.gov/105/plaws/publ276/PLAW-105publ276.pdf (accessed March 5, 2023). In recent years, the statutory restriction on new construction of public housing units has been circumvented through some narrow uses of preservation programs such as the Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD) program, initially authorized in 2012 and reauthorized several times since under higher program unit conversion caps. Congress also provided paths for renewal and continuation of a portion of existing public housing; project/site-based housing stock (refinancing with long-term HAP contract commitments); and Section 8 units through the Multifamily Assisted Housing Reform and Affordability Act of 1997 (MAHRA). H.R. 2158, Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1998, Public Law No. 105-65, 105th Congress, October 27, 1997, Title V, https://www.congress.gov/105/plaws/publ65/PLAW-105publ65.pdf (accessed March 5, 2023). 44. As the evolution of HUD rental assistance transitions away from the public housing model toward housing choice vouchers, there should be adequate landlord participation to ensure that the supply of housing units for rent in these programs meets the demand for rent among eligible tenants. This issue has been addressed in various ways, including by a task force instituted at the department during the Trump Administration, but could likely remain a challenge in the administration of the program. — 517 — 16 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR William Perry Pendley The U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) oversees, manages, and protects the nation’s natural resources and cultural heritage; provides scientific and other information about those resources; and honors the nation’s trust responsibilities or special commitments to American Indians, Alaska Natives, and affiliated island communities. AGENCY OVERVIEW DOI’s purview encompasses more than 500 million acres of federal lands, including national parks and national wildlife refuges; 700 million acres of sub- surface minerals; 1.7 billion acres of the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS); 23 percent of the nation’s energy; water in 17 western states; and trust responsibilities for 566 Indian tribes and Alaska Natives. DOI’s 2024 budget request totals $18.9 billion, an increase of $2 billion, or 12 percent, more than the 2023 enacted level. The budget also provides an estimated $12.6 billion in permanent funding in 2024. In 2024, DOI will generate receipts of $19.6 billion. A “Home Department” had been considered in 1789 and urged by Presidents over the decades until DOI’s creation in 1849. The variety of its early responsibil- ities—the Indian Bureau, the General Land Office, the Bureau of Pensions, and the Patent Office, among others—earned it various nicknames, including “Great Miscellany,” “hydra-headed monster,” and “Mother of Departments.”1 Its mission became more focused on natural resources with the rise of the conservation move- ment in the early 20th century; however, it kept its historic (since the days of the Founding Fathers) role as overseer of vast working landscapes involving grazing,

Department of Health and Human Services

Minimal

Vector: 58%

Pages: 527-529AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill addresses Rapid Ohia Death in Hawaii's forests through interagency collaboration and funding, while the Project 2025 HHS policy focuses on OCR authority, religious exemptions, vaccine conscience, and Section 1557 regulations—there is no substantive overlap in subject matter or objectives."

— 495 — Department of Health and Human Services l HHS should restore OCR authority to review requests for and render opinions on the application of RFRA to requests for religious accommodation of people, families, and doctors who cannot in good conscience take or administer vaccines, including those made or tested with aborted fetal cell lines. l HHS should restore Section 1557, Section 504, and other OCR regulations and fix guidance documents. In 2020, the Trump Administration’s OCR published regulations under Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act that restored the agency’s enforcement of that law to the limits of its statutory text, deferred to the ACA’s widespread use of a binary biological conception of sex discrimination, and specified that the regulation must comply with the religious exemption and abortion neutrality clauses in Title IX from which it is derived as well as the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and other laws. Courts blocked core provisions of that rule from going into effect. In 2022, the Biden Administration proposed to reinstate a rule contradicting the scope of the statute and imposing nondiscrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. It is expected that this rule will be finalized in 2023 even though several courts have issued rulings against the interpretation on which it is based. l OCR should return its enforcement of sex discrimination to the statutory framework of Section 1557 and Title IX. Specifically, it should: 1. Remove all guidance issued under the Biden Administration concerning sexual orientation and gender identity under Section 1557, particularly the May 2021 announcement of enforcement82 and March 2022 statement threatening states that protect minors from genital mutilation.83 2. Issue a general statement of policy specifying that it will not enforce any prohibition on sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination in the Section 1557 regulation and that it will prioritize compliance with the First Amendment, RFRA, and federal conscience laws in any case implicating those claims. DOJ should commit to defending these actions aggressively against inevitable court challenges, including under cases such as Heckler v. Chaney.84 — 496 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 3. Issue a proposed rule to restore the Trump regulations under Section 1557, explicitly interpreting the law not to include sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination based on the textual approach to male and female biology taken by Congress in the ACA, the need to recognize biological distinctions as part of the sound practice of health care, and the need to ensure protections of medical judgment and conscience. DOJ should agree to defend this rule to the Supreme Court if necessary. 4. Issue a general statement of policy announcing that it plans to enforce Section 1557 discrimination bans by refocusing on serious cases of race, sex, and disability discrimination. In particular, OCR should highlight its 2019 investigation and voluntary resolution agreement with Michigan State University based on the sexual abuse of gymnasts by Larry Nassar. OCR should also coordinate with the Department of Education on a public education and civil rights enforcement campaign to ensure that female college athletes who become pregnant are no longer pressured to obtain abortions; pursue race discrimination claims against entities that adopt or impose racially discriminatory policies such as those based on critical race theory; and announce its intention to enforce disability rights laws to protect children born prematurely, children with disabilities, and children born alive after abortions. 5. Issue and finalize the Trump-era draft disability rights regulations concerning crisis standards of care and use of Quality of Life Adjusted Years (QALYs), and reissue and finalize a disability regulation (withdrawn by the Biden Administration) that prohibited discriminatory application of assisted suicide and denial of life-saving treatments for disabled newborns. l OCR should withdraw its pharmacy abortion mandate guidance. OCR should withdraw its “Obligations Under Federal Civil Rights Laws to Ensure Access to Comprehensive Reproductive Health Care Services” guidance for retail pharmacies,85 which purports to address nondiscrimination obligations of pharmacies under federal civil rights laws and in fact orders them to stock and dispense first-trimester abortion drugs. The guidance invents this so-called requirement and fails to acknowledge that pharmacies and pharmacists have the right not to participate in abortions, including pill-induced abortions, if doing so would violate their sincere moral or religious objections. Moreover, no federal civil rights laws preempt state pro-life statutes.

Department of Health and Human Services

Minimal

Vector: 57%

Pages: 530-532AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill addresses Rapid Ohia Death in Hawaii involving federal land management agencies, while the Project 2025 policy concerns HHS guidance on abortion and HIPAA; there is no substantive overlap."

— 497 — Department of Health and Human Services l OCR should withdraw its Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)86 guidance on abortion. OCR should withdraw its June 2022 guidance87 that purports to address patient privacy concerns following the Dobbs decision but is actually a politicized statement in favor of abortion and against Dobbs. HIPAA covers patients in the womb, but this guidance treats them as nonpersons contrary to law. The guidance is unnecessary and contributes to ideologically motivated fearmongering about abortion after Dobbs. AUTHOR’S NOTE: The preparation of this chapter was a collective enterprise of selfless individuals involved in the 2025 Presidential Transition Project. All contributors to this chapter are listed at the front of this volume and include former officials in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and other agencies, as well as academics, attorneys, and experts in the health care and insurance fields. — 498 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise ENDNOTES 1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Strategic Plan, FY 2018–2022, p. 50, https://aspe.hhs.gov/ sites/default/files/documents/feac346aca967bfadc446398679e14ec/hhs-strategic-plan-fy-2018-2022.pdf (accessed February 7, 2023). 2. “Strategic Goal 1: Protect and Strengthen Equitable Access to High Quality and Affordable Healthcare” in ibid. “In the context of HHS, this Strategic Plan adopts the definition of underserved communities listed in Executive Order 13985: Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities through the Federal Government to refer to ‘populations sharing a particular characteristic, as well as geographic communities, who have been systematically denied a full opportunity to participate in aspects of economic, social, and civic life’; this definition includes individuals who belong to underserved communities that have been denied such treatment, such as Black, Latino, and Indigenous and Native American persons, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders and other persons of color; members of religious minorities; lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) persons; persons with disabilities; persons who live in rural areas; and persons otherwise adversely affected by persistent poverty or inequality. Individuals may belong to more than one underserved community and face intersecting barriers. This definition applies to the terms underserved communities and underserved populations throughout this Strategic Plan.” Ibid. Emphasis in original. 3. Karen Weintraub, “Americans’ Life Expectancy Continues to Fall, Erasing Health Gains of the Last Quarter Century,” USA Today, December 22, 2022, https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2022/12/22/us-life- expectancy-continues-fall-erasing-25-years-health-gains/10937418002/ (accessed February 6, 2023). 4. Apoorva Mandavilli, “The C.D.C. Isn’t Publishing Large Portions of the Data It Collects,” The New York Times, updated February 22, 2022, https://www.congress.gov/117/meeting/house/114450/documents/HHRG-117- IF02-20220302-SD004.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023). 5. Zachary B. Sluzala and Edmund F. Haislmaier, “Lessons from COVID-19: How Policymakers Should Reform the Regulation of Clinical Testing,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 3696, March 28, 2022, https://www. heritage.org/public-health/report/lessons-covid-19-how-policymakers-should-reform-the-regulation-clinical. 6. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (C),” https://www.cdc.gov/maso/pdf/cdcmiss.pdf (March 16, 2023). 7. Judith Garber, “CDC ‘Disclaimers’ Hide Financial Conflicts of Interest,” Lown Institute Accountability Blog, November 6, 2019, https://lowninstitute.org/cdc-disclaimers-hide-financial-conflicts-of-interest/ (accessed February 6, 2023). See also U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “CDC Foundation Active Programs (October 1, 2014–September 30, 2015),” https://www. cdcfoundation.org/sites/default/files/upload/pdf/CDCFoundation-ActivePrograms-FY2015.pdf (accessed February 7, 2023); “CDC Active Programs (October 1, 2015–September 30, 2016),” https://www.cdcfoundation. org/sites/default/files/upload/pdf/CDCFoundation-ActivePrograms-FY2016.pdf (accessed February 7, 2023); “CDC Foundation Active Programs (October 1, 2016–September 30, 2017),” https://www.cdcfoundation.org/ sites/default/files/upload/pdf/CDCFoundation-ActivePrograms-FY2017.pdf (accessed February 7, 2023); “CDC Foundation Active Programs (October 1, 2017–September 30, 2018),” https://www.cdcfoundation.org/sites/default/ files/upload/pdf/CDCFoundation-ActivePrograms-FY2018.pdf (accessed February 7, 2023); “CDC Foundation Active Programs, October 1, 2018–September 30, 2019,” https://www.cdcfoundation.org/sites/default/files/upload/ pdf/CDCFoundation-ActivePrograms-FY2019.pdf (accessed February 7, 2023); “CDC Foundation Active Programs, October 1, 2029–September 30, 2020,” https://www.cdcfoundation.org/CDCF-ActivePrograms-CDC-FY20?inline (accessed February 7, 2023); and “CDC Foundation Active Programs, October 1, 2020–September 30, 2021,” https://www.cdcfoundation.org/CDCF-ActivePrograms-CDC-FY21?inline (accessed February 7, 2023). 8. Joel White and Doug Badger, “In Order to Defeat COVID-19, the Federal Government Must Modernize Its Public Health Data,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 3527, September 3, 2020, https://www.heritage. org/sites/default/files/2020-09/BG3527_0.pdf. 9. S. 15, Ensuring Accurate and Complete Abortion Data Reporting Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 23, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/s15/BILLS-118s15is.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023), and H.R. 632, Ensuring Accurate and Complete Abortion Data Reporting Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 30, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr632/BILLS-118hr632ih.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023). 10. Doug Badger, “How Congress Can Make Real Progress on Drug Prices,” Heritage Foundation Issue Brief No. 5016, December 9, 2019, https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/files/2019-12/IB5016_1.pdf.

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Sen. Hirono, Mazie K.

Veteran Fraud Reimbursement Act of 2025

119/s/892

Pursuing Equity in Mental Health Act

119/s/1448

A resolution expressing support for the staff of public, school, academic, and special libraries in the United States and the essential services those libraries provide to communities, recognizing the need for funding commensurate with the broad scope of social service and community supports provided by libraries, preserving the right of all citizens of the United States to freely access information and resources in their communities, supporting a strong union voice for library workers, and defending the civil rights of library staff.

119/sres/169

Back to All Bills