Children and Teens’ Online Privacy Protection Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/s/836
Last Updated: September 7, 2026

Sponsored by

Sen. Markey, Edward J. [D-MA]

ID: M000133

Follow the money

The bill

Children and Teens’ Online Privacy Protection Act

S. 836, 119th Congress — read as touching Big Tech Platforms.

The sponsor

Sen. Markey, Edward J. [D-MA]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$72,200 raised

22 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

95% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Federal Trade Commission" section, p. 908-910 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Held at the desk.

March 15, 2026

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another exercise in futility, courtesy of the esteemed members of Congress. Let's dissect this trainwreck, shall we?

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Children and Teens' Online Privacy Protection Act (S 836) claims to strengthen protections for minors' online personal information. How quaint. In reality, it's a half-hearted attempt to address the symptoms of a far more insidious disease: corporate greed and government incompetence.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998 (COPPA) by expanding the definition of "operator" to include mobile applications, online services, and websites that collect personal information from minors. It also broadens the scope of protected information to include geolocation data, biometric information, and other identifiable characteristics.

But don't be fooled – these changes are merely cosmetic. The bill still allows operators to collect and use minors' personal information for "internal operations," a conveniently vague term that will undoubtedly be exploited by corporate interests.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects:

* Corporate lobbyists, who will find ways to water down the regulations or exploit loopholes. * Tech companies, which will pretend to care about user privacy while continuing to harvest and monetize minors' data. * Parents, who will remain blissfully ignorant of the bill's shortcomings, convinced that their children are now safer online (spoiler alert: they're not). * Minors themselves, who will continue to be exploited by corporate interests and government incompetence.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a Band-Aid on a bullet wound. It may provide some minor protections for minors' online privacy, but it does nothing to address the root causes of the problem:

* Corporate greed: Companies will continue to prioritize profits over user privacy. * Government incompetence: Regulators will struggle to keep pace with rapidly evolving technology and corporate tactics.

In short, this bill is a token effort to placate concerned citizens while allowing the status quo to persist. It's a classic case of "legislative theater," designed to create the illusion of action without actually addressing the underlying issues.

Diagnosis: Terminal naivety, complicated by acute government incompetence and corporate malfeasance. Prognosis: Poor, with a high likelihood of further exploitation and erosion of online privacy.

Related Topics

Cybersecurity & Data Privacy
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Sen. Markey, Edward J. [D-MA]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$599,464
297 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$2,000
Committees
$0
Individuals
$597,464

No PAC contributions found

1
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
2 transactions
$2,000

No committee contributions found

1
DONOHUE, JOHN
2 transactions
$9,900
2
HARRIS, WILLIAM SR.
3 transactions
$9,500
3
SWIG, MARY
3 transactions
$7,600
4
MARCHAND, PAUL
3 transactions
$7,500
5
ABRAMS, JEFFREY J.
2 transactions
$6,600
6
BRADLEY, DAVID
2 transactions
$6,600
7
BRADLEY, KATHERINE BRITTAIN
2 transactions
$6,600
8
BUTLER, ANDREW
2 transactions
$6,600
9
CARDWELL, NEAL
2 transactions
$6,600
10
CONWAY, RONALD C.
2 transactions
$6,600
11
DOUGLAS, MICHAEL
2 transactions
$6,600
12
GOLDBERG, BENNETT H.
2 transactions
$6,600
13
GOLDBERG, CAROL B.
2 transactions
$6,600
14
GOLDBERG, HENRY H.
2 transactions
$6,600
15
GUTTMAN KLEIN, DANIELLE
2 transactions
$6,600
16
KLEIN III, ROB
2 transactions
$6,600
17
KLEIN, ROBERT N. II
2 transactions
$6,600
18
LANDRY, BARRIE
2 transactions
$6,600
19
MANOCHERIAN, JED
2 transactions
$6,600
20
MCGRATH, KATHLEEN
2 transactions
$6,600
21
MERRIGAN, JOHN A.
2 transactions
$6,600
22
MUNGER, PHILIP R.
2 transactions
$6,600
23
RESNICK, LYNDA RAE
2 transactions
$6,600
24
RESNICK, STEWART A.
2 transactions
$6,600
25
ROBINSON, FRANCES
2 transactions
$6,600
26
RUBIN, MILES
2 transactions
$6,600
27
RUBIN, NANCY
2 transactions
$6,600
28
SAKELLARIS, GEORGE P.
2 transactions
$6,600
29
TOCCO, JESSICA BEESON
2 transactions
$6,600
30
WEISSMAN, ANN
2 transactions
$6,600
31
WEISSMAN, IRVING
2 transactions
$6,600
32
WESTLY, STEVEN
2 transactions
$6,500
33
ATKINS, CHET G.
2 transactions
$6,000
34
BRILLIANT, LARRY B
2 transactions
$6,000
35
ANDELSON, MICHELE
2 transactions
$5,000
36
JOHNSTON, PHILIP
2 transactions
$5,000
37
KARGMAN, WILLIAM M.
2 transactions
$5,000
38
ROSS, GARY
2 transactions
$5,000
39
SRIDHAR, KR
2 transactions
$5,000
40
ZEVNIK, PAUL A.
3 transactions
$4,300
41
WHITE, ROBERT F.
2 transactions
$4,200
42
MOUTOUDIS, EVANGELOS
2 transactions
$3,800
43
BOYLE, JAMES
4 transactions
$3,500
44
BAER, WILLIAM
1 transaction
$3,300
45
BENDER, GRACE
1 transaction
$3,300
46
BOGER, JOSHUA
1 transaction
$3,300
47
CROLL, DAVID D.
1 transaction
$3,300
48
CROWLEY, MATTHEW
1 transaction
$3,300
49
HUNDT, REED
1 transaction
$3,300
50
JONES, DAVID
1 transaction
$3,300
51
LUDWIG, EUGENE A.
1 transaction
$3,300
52
MAKIHARA, JUN
1 transaction
$3,300
53
MOUTOUDIS, ELEFTHERIA
1 transaction
$3,300
54
PIERCE, DAVID
1 transaction
$3,300
55
RIVERA GAMARRA, LILIANA
1 transaction
$3,300
56
SANT, ROGER W.
1 transaction
$3,300
57
SCHMIDT, WENDY
1 transaction
$3,300
58
SWIG, STEVEN
2 transactions
$3,300
59
UNGER, KATHLEEN
1 transaction
$3,300
60
UNGER, STEPHEN
1 transaction
$3,300
61
WEISS, DANIEL
1 transaction
$3,300
62
EMMET, HENRY
4 transactions
$3,250
63
NIEMCZEWSKI, CHRIS
1 transaction
$3,231
64
TEPPER, YANIV
1 transaction
$3,200
65
CAFRITZ, JANE
1 transaction
$3,000
66
GUERNSEY, SHERWOOD
2 transactions
$3,000
67
TANZI, RUDOLPH
1 transaction
$3,000
68
BROWNELL, ANNE
5 transactions
$3,000
69
HOQUE, MAKSUDUL
1 transaction
$2,900
70
KLEIN, ISRAEL
1 transaction
$2,900
71
NESSEL, ARIEL
1 transaction
$2,900
72
BAUER, PETER
2 transactions
$2,800
73
MORNINGSTAR, RICHARD
1 transaction
$2,800
74
SYED, BADRA
1 transaction
$2,700
75
BROSNAN, KEELY
1 transaction
$2,500
76
DERDERIAN, JAMES
2 transactions
$2,500
77
PRIOR, MICHAEL T.
1 transaction
$2,500
78
RESOR, GRIFF
5 transactions
$2,500
79
SOBRATO, JOHN M
1 transaction
$2,500
80
SILVERSTEIN, PATRICIA
1 transaction
$2,400
81
SILVERSTEIN, ROGER
1 transaction
$2,400
82
BAYLISS, KIM KOONTZ
1 transaction
$2,300
83
NORTON, CHARLES F. JR.
2 transactions
$2,300
84
VALLEE, JAMES
1 transaction
$2,263
85
MORRIS, SARA
3 transactions
$2,200
86
BERKOWITZ, ROGER F.
1 transaction
$2,000
87
BUSH, ANTOINETTE
2 transactions
$2,000
88
CLARK, BRIAN M
1 transaction
$2,000
89
DOHERTY, REGINA QUINLAN
1 transaction
$2,000
90
GLYNN, THOMAS P. III
1 transaction
$2,000
91
GOLD, PAULA
3 transactions
$2,000
92
HALSTROM, FREDERIC
1 transaction
$2,000
93
HARRINGTON, MICHAEL J.
2 transactions
$2,000
94
LAW, DONALD
2 transactions
$2,000
95
LEVIN, BLAIR
1 transaction
$2,000
96
MACDONALD, ALEX
3 transactions
$2,000
97
MANNING, MARY JO
4 transactions
$2,000
98
MOELLER, JANE
1 transaction
$2,000
99
MURPHY, JOHN
2 transactions
$2,000
100
SEGEL, ARTHUR I.
1 transaction
$2,000
101
SHAH, ANIKET
1 transaction
$2,000
102
WILKINS, JON S. JR.
1 transaction
$2,000
103
RAMER, BRUCE
1 transaction
$1,720
104
VRADENBURG, GEORGE III
2 transactions
$1,600
105
BELL, DAWN
1 transaction
$1,500
106
BENCHLEY, WENDY
2 transactions
$1,500
107
BURBANK, STEPHEN
3 transactions
$1,500
108
D'ALESSANDRO, DAVID
1 transaction
$1,500
109
GOODFRIEND, DAVID
2 transactions
$1,500
110
LASALA, BARRY
1 transaction
$1,500
111
RAPPAPORT, SUSAN
3 transactions
$1,500
112
TAVLARIDES, MARK
2 transactions
$1,500
113
SELLIKEN, JOSEPH
2 transactions
$1,300
114
PAPOULIAS-SAKELLARIS, CATHERINE
1 transaction
$1,200
115
ALCALDE, HECTOR
1 transaction
$1,000
116
ATHY, ANDREW JR.
1 transaction
$1,000
117
BALIAN, RITA
2 transactions
$1,000
118
BARTLETT, JACOB
1 transaction
$1,000
119
BARTLETT, JOHN
1 transaction
$1,000
120
BENINCASA, JUSTIN D.
1 transaction
$1,000
121
BOYLE, LEO V.
1 transaction
$1,000
122
BRENNAN, JACK
1 transaction
$1,000
123
CARR, RYAN
1 transaction
$1,000
124
CARROLL, JOHN J. JR.
1 transaction
$1,000
125
CHOWDHURY, NUSRAT J
1 transaction
$1,000
126
COOK WILTON, KATHY JO
1 transaction
$1,000
127
DELEON, RUDY
1 transaction
$1,000
128
DEYST, JOHN
1 transaction
$1,000
129
DORE, LAWRENCE H JR
1 transaction
$1,000
130
FARRAH, LOUIS J II
1 transaction
$1,000
131
FEINGOLD, ELLEN
2 transactions
$1,000
132
FIELDS, JACK M. JR.
1 transaction
$1,000
133
FINEBERG, HARVEY
1 transaction
$1,000
134
FLAHERTY, SEAN
1 transaction
$1,000
135
FLORESCU, JOHN
1 transaction
$1,000
136
GOLDBERG, FRED
1 transaction
$1,000
137
GOLDBERG, WENDY
1 transaction
$1,000
138
GOO, MICHAEL
2 transactions
$1,000
139
GORE, MARY T
1 transaction
$1,000
140
HADLEY, CHRISTOPHER
1 transaction
$1,000
141
HAND, LLOYD
1 transaction
$1,000
142
HARE, BRENDAN
1 transaction
$1,000
143
HARRINGTON, MICHAEL
1 transaction
$1,000
144
HENNESSEY, JOHN W
2 transactions
$1,000
145
HIGGINS, ROBERT F.
1 transaction
$1,000
146
HORMEL, RAMPA
1 transaction
$1,000
147
HOSSAIN, AKMAL MD
1 transaction
$1,000
148
HULL, MEGAN
1 transaction
$1,000
149
IANNELLA, CHRISTOPHER JR.
1 transaction
$1,000
150
JACOBS, PATRICIA
1 transaction
$1,000
151
JEPPSON, JOHN
1 transaction
$1,000
152
JOHNSON, DOUGLAS
1 transaction
$1,000
153
JONES, PATRICK
1 transaction
$1,000
154
KAUFFMAN, RICHARD
1 transaction
$1,000
155
KAZI, MUAZZAM
1 transaction
$1,000
156
KELLEHER, TIMOTHY C. III
1 transaction
$1,000
157
KOUNTOUPES, LISA M.
1 transaction
$1,000
158
LACAMERA, PAUL
2 transactions
$1,000
159
LEBLANC, MARIANNE
1 transaction
$1,000
160
LEITER, DAVID
1 transaction
$1,000
161
LENEHAN, PAMELA
1 transaction
$1,000
162
LEON, JUSTIN
1 transaction
$1,000
163
LOYLESS, BETSY
1 transaction
$1,000
164
MABEY, MARY
1 transaction
$1,000
165
MAHONEY, SHELAGH E
1 transaction
$1,000
166
MARTIN, BRAD
1 transaction
$1,000
167
MATTHEWS, KATHLEEN C.
1 transaction
$1,000
168
MCCARRON, ROBERT J.
1 transaction
$1,000
169
MEEHAN, MARTIN T.
1 transaction
$1,000
170
MINAHAN, ALFRED A.
2 transactions
$1,000
171
MINAHAN, JOANNE & AL
1 transaction
$1,000
172
MONSUR, MOHAMMED A.
1 transaction
$1,000
173
MURPHY, LYNDA
1 transaction
$1,000
174
NURUZZAMAN, QUAZI M.
1 transaction
$1,000
175
O'CONNELL, DANIEL
1 transaction
$1,000
176
O'CONNELL, MARILYN LYNG
1 transaction
$1,000
177
ORTNER, CHARLES
1 transaction
$1,000
178
OTTAWAY, ALEXANDRA
2 transactions
$1,000
179
PENDERGAST, EDWARD
1 transaction
$1,000
180
PERGAMENT, RUSSEL
1 transaction
$1,000
181
POMERANCE, RAFE
1 transaction
$1,000
182
RAHMAN, ASHIKUR
1 transaction
$1,000
183
RAISER, MARY M.
1 transaction
$1,000
184
RODOPHELE, ROBERT P.
1 transaction
$1,000
185
ROOSEVELT JR., JAMES
2 transactions
$1,000
186
RUSSO, JANE L
1 transaction
$1,000
187
SANFILIPPO, ANGELA
1 transaction
$1,000
188
SCHNED, HARRY
1 transaction
$1,000
189
SEYMOUR, JANE
1 transaction
$1,000
190
SHAW, RHOD M.
1 transaction
$1,000
191
SHEFF, DOUGLAS K.
1 transaction
$1,000
192
SIMON, NEAL S.
1 transaction
$1,000
193
SLAIMAN, GARY D.
1 transaction
$1,000
194
SMITH, JAMES E.
1 transaction
$1,000
195
SOLOMONT, ALAN
1 transaction
$1,000
196
STOTTLEMYER, JUSTIN
1 transaction
$1,000
197
STREISAND, BARBARA
1 transaction
$1,000
198
TARRICONE, ANTHONY
1 transaction
$1,000
199
TRAVAGLINI, ROBERT E.
1 transaction
$1,000
200
VERMA, VISHAL
1 transaction
$1,000
201
WHITE, ROBERT M.
1 transaction
$1,000
202
ZIEGLER, BART
1 transaction
$1,000
203
BOYLE, JIM
2 transactions
$1,000
204
KEARNEY, BERNADETTE
1 transaction
$800
205
NAGLE, ROBERT
1 transaction
$800
206
BOYLE, ANNE C.
1 transaction
$700
207
DYM, BARRY
1 transaction
$600
208
PEABODY, GEORGE
1 transaction
$600
209
WALDRON, GERARD
1 transaction
$600
210
AFREEN, AL BELI
1 transaction
$500
211
AINSWORTH, PETER
1 transaction
$500
212
ALI, REZA
1 transaction
$500
213
ANDELSON, AMY
1 transaction
$500
214
AYOUB, PAUL JOSEPH
1 transaction
$500
215
BACHMAN, KATHARINE E.
1 transaction
$500
216
BALBONI, PHILIP
1 transaction
$500
217
BERMAN, ROGER L.
1 transaction
$500
218
BLAIS, CRAIG L.
1 transaction
$500
219
BRAMANTE, SALVATORE
1 transaction
$500
220
BRESKIN, JULIE
1 transaction
$500
221
BROWN, ANN
1 transaction
$500
222
CETRULO, LAWRENCE
1 transaction
$500
223
COSTELLO, MICHAEL C.
1 transaction
$500
224
COWELL, STEPHEN
1 transaction
$500
225
CUNNINGHAM, BOBBY
1 transaction
$500
226
DELELLO, ROBERT A.
1 transaction
$500
227
GLICKMAN, JONATHAN B.
1 transaction
$500
228
HALPERT, STUART
1 transaction
$500
229
HAMMERLE, TERESE
1 transaction
$500
230
HARTNETT, PAUL J. JR.
1 transaction
$500
231
HECK, BOBBIE
1 transaction
$500
232
HENN, JOHN
1 transaction
$500
233
HILLIS, JANETTE
1 transaction
$500
234
IADAROLA, ELIZABETH
1 transaction
$500
235
JAMES, CLAUDIA
1 transaction
$500
236
JOYCE, MICHAEL
1 transaction
$500
237
KAHN, THOMAS
1 transaction
$500
238
KATEB, BABAK
1 transaction
$500
239
KENEALY, EDMUND
1 transaction
$500
240
KOEHLER, MIKE
1 transaction
$500
241
KORNBLUH, KAREN
1 transaction
$500
242
KORNGOLD, ADAM
1 transaction
$500
243
KWAN, SHU MAY
1 transaction
$500
244
LEAKE, ALEXANDRA
1 transaction
$500
245
LEAL, MARIAN SUSAN
1 transaction
$500
246
LIGUORI, RAFFAELE R
1 transaction
$500
247
LIPSON, FRAN
1 transaction
$500
248
LONERGAN, PAUL A.
1 transaction
$500
249
LORSCH, PATRICIA M.
1 transaction
$500
250
LOW, STEPHANIE
1 transaction
$500
251
LUTZ, FRED T
1 transaction
$500
252
MAGUIRE MEEHAN, JENNIFER
1 transaction
$500
253
MAHONEY, MARY R.
1 transaction
$500
254
MARCUS, JESSICA
1 transaction
$500
255
MCCARTHY, JOHN
1 transaction
$500
256
MCGLYNN JR., JOHN J.
1 transaction
$500
257
MEANS, ROSEANNA
1 transaction
$500
258
MITROPOULOS, NICHOLAS T.
1 transaction
$500
259
MONE, MICHAEL
1 transaction
$500
260
MOSHE, YARIV
1 transaction
$500
261
MOULTON, DAVID
1 transaction
$500
262
NOURI, KEYVAN
1 transaction
$500
263
O'NEILL, BRIAN T.
1 transaction
$500
264
OBRIEN, ANDREW
1 transaction
$500
265
OLEARY, JAMES
1 transaction
$500
266
PAONE, MARTIN
1 transaction
$500
267
PARKER, GLENN
1 transaction
$500
268
PATERNITI, RICHARD
1 transaction
$500
269
PERETZ, ANNE
1 transaction
$500
270
RAFSHOON, EDEN
1 transaction
$500
271
REGUNBERG, MICHAL
1 transaction
$500
272
REICHMAN, JUDITH
1 transaction
$500
273
RICCA, JOSEPH A
1 transaction
$500
274
RIZZOLO, CAROL
1 transaction
$500
275
ROTENBERG, MICHAEL
1 transaction
$500
276
ROYCE, JACQUELINE
1 transaction
$500
277
RUGEL, AMY
1 transaction
$500
278
SABAGH, DENYSE
1 transaction
$500
279
SARKISIAN, ELLEN
1 transaction
$500
280
SEGARS, CHARLES
1 transaction
$500
281
SMITH, ABBE Y.
1 transaction
$500
282
SOISSON, AMY M.
1 transaction
$500
283
SOLOMON, KENNETH
1 transaction
$500
284
STEFANINI, JOHN AUGUSTO
1 transaction
$500
285
SUTTON, BARBARA
1 transaction
$500
286
SYKES, BRIAN F
1 transaction
$500
287
THOMPSON, KENNETH
1 transaction
$500
288
WALKER, KEVIN
1 transaction
$500
289
WOLFE, STEVEN
1 transaction
$500
290
WOLLACK, RICHARD
1 transaction
$500
291
WORLEY, RICHARD
1 transaction
$500

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Sen. Cassidy, Bill [R-LA]

ID: C001075

Top Contributors

20

1
YAWITZ, JESS B. MR.
RETIRED • RETIRED
IndividualSAINT LOUIS, MO
$14,000
Jun 11, 2024
2
MANDELBLATT, DANIELLE
DMM PROPRIETA MANAGEMENT • MANAGER
IndividualASPEN, CO
$9,900
Nov 2, 2023
3
MANDELBLATT, ERIC
SOROBAN CAPITAL PARTNERS LP • MANAGING PARTNER
IndividualASPEN, CO
$9,900
Nov 2, 2023
4
JAYASINGHE, SAMAN K. DR.
SELF-EMPLOYED • PHYSICIAN
IndividualBATON ROUGE, LA
$9,900
Jun 13, 2024
5
KARP, ALEXANDER C.
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES • CEO
IndividualBEDFORD, NH
$9,900
Apr 16, 2024
6
OBERNDORF, SUSAN
HOMEMAKER • HOMEMAKER
IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA
$9,900
Jun 5, 2024
7
OBERNDORF, WILLIAM
OBERNDORF ENTERPRISES • OWNER
IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA
$9,900
Jun 5, 2024
8
YAWITZ, ALICE G.
RETIRED • RETIRED
IndividualST. LOUIS, MO
$9,900
Jun 18, 2024
9
GRIGSBY, BOBBI F. MRS.
HOMEMAKER • HOMEMAKER
IndividualBATON ROUGE, LA
$6,600
Dec 23, 2024
10
GRIGSBY, L. LANE MR.
CAJUN INDUSTRIES LLC • CHAIRMAN EMERITUS
IndividualBATON ROUGE, LA
$6,600
Dec 23, 2024

Sen. Cantwell, Maria [D-WA]

ID: C000127

Top Contributors

70

1
SAC FOX TRIBE
OrganizationTAMA, IA
$5,000
Oct 29, 2024
2
LOWER ELWHA KLALLAM TRIBE
OrganizationPORT ANGELES, WA
$3,360
Mar 31, 2023
3
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationHIGHLAND, CA
$3,300
Oct 28, 2023
4
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationHIGHLAND, CA
$3,300
Dec 21, 2023
5
SAN PABLO LYTTON TRIBE
OrganizationSAN PABLO, CA
$3,300
Nov 16, 2023
6
SAN PABLO LYTTON TRIBE
OrganizationSAN PABLO, CA
$3,300
Nov 16, 2023
7
SAULT STE MARIE TRIBE OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS
OrganizationSAULT SAINTE MARIE, MI
$3,300
Dec 14, 2023
8
SENECA NATION OF INDIANS
OrganizationSALAMANCA, NY
$3,300
Dec 14, 2023
9
MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE
OrganizationAUBURN, WA
$3,300
May 12, 2023
10
NISQUALLY INDIAN TRIBE
OrganizationOLYMPIA, WA
$3,300
Jun 30, 2023

Sen. Schatz, Brian [D-HI]

ID: S001194

Top Contributors

44

1
CHEROKEE NATION
OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK
$3,300
Dec 30, 2024
2
CATAWBA INDIAN NATION
OrganizationROCK HILL, SC
$3,300
May 17, 2024
3
SENECA NATION OF INDIANS
OrganizationSALAMANCA, NY
$3,300
Apr 17, 2024
4
OTOE MISSOURIA TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA
OrganizationRED ROCK, OK
$3,300
Aug 12, 2023
5
PASCUA YAQUI TRIBE
OrganizationTUCSON, AZ
$3,300
Sep 29, 2023
6
OTOE MISSOURIA TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA
OrganizationRED ROCK, OK
$3,300
Aug 12, 2023
7
HABEMATOLEL POMO OF UPPER LAKE
OrganizationUPPER LAKE, CA
$3,300
Aug 12, 2023
8
HABEMATOLEL POMO OF UPPER LAKE
OrganizationUPPER LAKE, CA
$3,300
Aug 12, 2023
9
TURTLE MOUNTAIN BAND OF CHIPPEWA
OrganizationBELCOURT, ND
$3,300
Aug 12, 2023
10
TURTLE MOUNTAIN BAND OF CHIPPEWA
OrganizationBELCOURT, ND
$3,300
Aug 12, 2023

Sen. Capito, Shelley Moore [R-WV]

ID: C001047

Top Contributors

23

1
CHEROKEE NATION
OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK
$2,800
Dec 31, 2024
2
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN
$1,000
Nov 8, 2023
3
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN
$1,000
Jul 22, 2024
4
ARNOLD, JOHN MR.
RETIRED • RETIRED
IndividualHOUSTON, TX
$6,600
Dec 27, 2023
5
MANOCHERIAN, JENNIFER MS.
RETIRED • RETIRED
IndividualSCARSDALE, NY
$6,600
Feb 17, 2023
6
MANOCHERIAN, JED MR.
SELF • REAL ESTATE
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$6,600
Feb 23, 2023
7
MANOCHERIAN, GREG MR.
SELF EMPLOYED • REAL ESTATE
IndividualPOUND RIDGE, NY
$6,600
Mar 1, 2023
8
MANOCHERIAN, KIM
PANAM EQUITIES • EXECUTIVE
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$6,600
Mar 27, 2023
9
KAY, ALISON MS.
KIDS CAPITAL • HEDGE FUND MANAGER
IndividualBEVERLY HILLS, CA
$6,600
Jun 20, 2023
10
MANDELBLATT, DANIELLE
DMM PROPRIETA MANAGEMENT • MANAGER
IndividualASPEN, CO
$6,600
Sep 26, 2024

Sen. Klobuchar, Amy [D-MN]

ID: K000367

Top Contributors

25

1
LEECH LAKE BAND OF OJIBWE
OrganizationCASS LAKE, MN
$3,300
Nov 5, 2024
2
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN
$3,300
Aug 25, 2023
3
CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA
OrganizationDURANT, OK
$2,500
Oct 7, 2024
4
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN
$2,300
Jul 17, 2023
5
ARISTOTLE INTERNATIONAL
CONDUIT TOTAL LISTED IN AGG. FIELD
OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC
$500
Jul 19, 2024
6
SMITH, BRADFORD
MICROSOFT CORPORATION • ATTORNEY
IndividualBELLEVUE, WA
$6,600
Mar 30, 2023
7
SMITH, BRADFORD
IndividualBELLEVUE, WA
$6,600
Mar 30, 2023
8
BADEN, DREW
PROFESSOR • UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND
IndividualBETHESDA, MD
$6,600
Feb 23, 2024
9
CAUCHY, CONSTANCE
NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED
IndividualMIDLAND, MI
$6,600
Jun 2, 2024
10
BADEN, DREW
IndividualBETHESDA, MD
$6,600
Mar 11, 2024

Sen. Crapo, Mike [R-ID]

ID: C000880

Top Contributors

25

1
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationBANNING, CA
$3,300
Jun 30, 2023
2
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationLOS ANGELES, CA
$2,000
Dec 19, 2024
3
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN
$1,000
Apr 30, 2024
4
ONEIDA NATION
OrganizationONEIDA, WI
$1,000
Sep 10, 2024
5
RENO-SPARKS INDIAN COLONY
OrganizationRENO, NV
$500
Sep 10, 2024
6
ARNOLD, JOHN D. MR.
NONE • RETIRED
IndividualHOUSTON, TX
$6,600
May 6, 2024
7
LEPRINO, TERRY L
NONE • RETIRED
IndividualDENVER, CO
$3,300
Nov 1, 2024
8
BUKOWSKY, BRANT
MORTGAGE RESEARCH CENTER • ENTREPRENEUR
IndividualCOLUMBIA, MO
$3,300
Oct 9, 2023
9
BUKOWSKY, BROCK
VETERANS UNITED • FINANCE
IndividualCOLUMBIA, MO
$3,300
Nov 28, 2023
10
SILBEY, ALEXANDER
ATS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. • CONSULTANT
IndividualWASHINGTON, DC
$3,300
Dec 21, 2023

Sen. Wyden, Ron [D-OR]

ID: W000779

Top Contributors

30

1
SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA
$2,000
Dec 12, 2024
2
MOHEGAN TRIBE OF INDIANS OF CONNECTICUT
OrganizationUNCASVILLE, CT
$1,000
Dec 28, 2023
3
SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA
$1,000
Dec 30, 2023
4
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSIONS INDIANS
OrganizationLOS ANGELES, CA
$1,000
Mar 26, 2024
5
SHAKOPEE MDWEKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN
$1,000
Jun 12, 2024
6
SHAKOPEE MDWEKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN
$1,000
May 31, 2023
7
MS BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS
OrganizationCHOCTAW, MS
$1,000
Dec 31, 2023
8
CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA
OrganizationDURANT, OK
$550
Oct 3, 2023
9
RENO-SPARKS INDIAN COLONY
OrganizationRENO, NV
$500
Jul 18, 2023
10
RENO-SPARKS INDIAN COLONY
OrganizationRENO, NV
$500
Sep 10, 2024

Sen. Grassley, Chuck [R-IA]

ID: G000386

Top Contributors

23

1
SAC & FOX TRIBE OF THE MISSISSIPPI IN IOWA
COMTAMA, IA
$2,000
Aug 8, 2023
2
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
COMPRIOR LAKE, MN
$1,000
Jul 23, 2024
3
WINRED
PACARLINGTON, VA
$25
Jul 4, 2024
4
SCHWARZMAN, CHRISTINE
RETIRED • RETIRED
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$6,600
Jan 10, 2024
5
SCHWARZMAN, STEPHEN
BLACKSTONE • CEO
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$6,600
Jan 16, 2024
6
KUMAR, SHALLI
AVG ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY • CHAIR
IndividualBETTENDORF, IA
$6,600
Jun 11, 2024
7
STARRETT, RONALD
RETIRED • RETIRED
IndividualCENTENNIAL, CO
$5,800
Jan 24, 2023
8
COLLINS, RICHARD
RETIRED • RETIRED
IndividualMARSHALLTOWN, IA
$5,523
Oct 1, 2024
9
COLLINS, RICHARD
IndividualMARSHALLTOWN, IA
$5,523
Oct 7, 2024
10
WEISS, LUKE
HOOVER'S HATCHERY • PRESIDENT
IndividualMASON CITY, IA
$3,300
Dec 11, 2024

Sen. Luján, Ben Ray [D-NM]

ID: L000570

Top Contributors

45

1
LYTTON BAND OF POMO INDIANS
OrganizationSANTA ROSA, CA
$3,300
Dec 5, 2023
2
OTOE-MISSOURIA TRIBE
OrganizationRED ROCK, OK
$3,300
Dec 7, 2023
3
LYTTON BAND OF POMO INDIANS
OrganizationSANTA ROSA, CA
$3,300
Dec 5, 2023
4
TAOS PUEBLO GOVERNOR'S OFFICE
OrganizationTAOS, NM
$3,300
Dec 2, 2024
5
OHKAY OWINGEH TRIBE
OrganizationOHKAY OWINGEH, NM
$3,300
Dec 2, 2024
6
BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationLAKESIDE, CA
$3,300
Apr 18, 2023
7
BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationLAKESIDE, CA
$3,300
May 22, 2024
8
MESCALERO APACHE TRIBE
OrganizationMESCALERO, NM
$3,300
Sep 25, 2023
9
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC
$2,500
Jun 25, 2024
10
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX
OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN
$2,000
Mar 21, 2024

Sen. Blumenthal, Richard [D-CT]

ID: B001277

Top Contributors

20

1
OLSON, LYNDON
NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED
IndividualWACO, TX
$3,300
Dec 20, 2024
2
ALIX, JAY
ALIX PARTNERS • FOUNDER
IndividualBIRMINGHAM, MI
$3,300
Oct 2, 2023
3
KIM, CHRISTINE M.
BBB LLC • ATTORNEY
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$3,300
Oct 31, 2023
4
ALIX, JAY
ALIX PARTNERS • FOUNDER
IndividualBIRMINGHAM, MI
$3,300
Apr 15, 2024
5
ROURE, RITA
PAGNY - LINCOLN HOSPITAL • PHYSICIAN
IndividualGREENWICH, CT
$3,300
Apr 10, 2024
6
ROURE, RITA
PAGNY - LINCOLN HOSPITAL • PHYSICIAN
IndividualGREENWICH, CT
$3,300
Apr 10, 2024
7
CHAVEZ, TOM
KRUX INC. • CEO
IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA
$3,300
Jul 13, 2024
8
CHAVEZ, TOM
KRUX INC. • CEO
IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA
$3,300
Jul 13, 2024
9
JONES, JERRY C.
LIVERAMP INC. • EXECUTIVE
IndividualLITTLE ROCK, AR
$3,300
Sep 19, 2024
10
NESSEL, ARIEL
NESSEL DEVELOPMENT • OWNER
IndividualROSS, CA
$3,300
Jul 12, 2024

Donor Network - Sen. Markey, Edward J. [D-MA]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 35 nodes and 59 connections

Total contributions: $59

Top Donors - Sen. Markey, Edward J. [D-MA]

Showing top 15 donors by contribution amount

1 Org14 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 4 harmed.

  • −Big Tech Platformsconfidence 0.90

    Section 2(b)(1)(A) prohibits operators from collecting personal information of children or teens for individual-specific advertising, which directly impacts business models of platforms like Meta, Google, and Amazon that rely on targeted ads.

  • −Telecommunicationsconfidence 0.80

    Section 2 expands definitions to include mobile applications and connected devices, increasing compliance burdens for telecom providers like AT&T and Verizon that offer apps and services collecting user data.

  • Section 2(b)(1)(B) restricts use of personal information for individual-specific advertising, affecting platforms like Amazon, Shopify, and DoorDash that use targeted ads for minors.

  • −Crypto & Fintechconfidence 0.60

    Section 4 mandates a GAO study on financial technology products' impact on teen privacy and mental health, signaling potential future regulation affecting firms like Coinbase, Stripe, and PayPal.

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Sen. Markey, Edward J. [D-MA])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HARMS

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Federal Trade Commission

Very Strong
Vector: 69%
Pages: 908-910AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill directly addresses the Project 2025 FTC policy goals by expanding COPPA to cover teens, strengthening parental consent requirements, enhancing FTC enforcement, and targeting unfair data practices—core elements highlighted in the Project 2025 text."

Key themes:child online privacyCOPPA expansionparental consentFTC enforcementunfair trade practices

— 875 — Federal Trade Commission Protecting Children Online. The FTC has long protected children in a variety of different contexts. Internet platforms profit from obtaining information from children without parents’ knowledge or consent—and social media’s effect on the well-being of American children is well-documented. Around 2012, American teens experienced a dramatic decline in wellness. Depression, self-harm, suicide attempts, and suicide all increased sharply among U.S. adolescents between 2011 and 2019,16 with similar trends worldwide.17 The increase occurred at the same time that social media use moved from rare to ubiquitous among teens,18 making social media a prime suspect for the sudden rise in mental health issues among teens. In addition, excessive social media use is strongly linked to mental health issues among individuals. Several studies strongly support the notion that social media use is a cause, not just a correlation, of subjective well-being and poor mental health.19 Social media and other large platforms form millions of contracts every year with American children. And even though a minor can void most contracts into which he or she enters, most jurisdictions have laws that hold minors accountable for the benefits received under the contract. Thus, children can make enforceable contracts for which parents could end up bearing responsibility. Targeting chil- dren to create potentially harmful contracts or making parents responsible for such contractual relationships is an unfair trade practice. The FTC, therefore, has the authority, interest, and duty to protect children online from such contractual relationships. l The FTC should examine platforms’ advertising and contract- making with children as a deceptive or unfair trade practice, perhaps requiring written parental consent. Currently, the Child Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA)20 regulates the information internet firms can obtain from children. COPPA fails because it (1) only protects children under the age of 13, leaving older teenagers completely unprotected and (2) only prohibits platforms from collecting information from a child using “actual knowledge” rather than abiding by the “constructive knowledge” standard, which prohibits collecting information from a user reasonably assumed to be underage. The FTC has rulemaking authority under this statute but has done little with this authority, nor can it—given the statutory constraints. However, l The FTC can and should institute unfair trade practices proceedings against entities that enter into contracts with children without parental consent. Personal parental responsibility is, of course, key, but the law must respect, not undermine, lawful parental authority. — 876 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Other conservatives are more skeptical concerning the effect of online expe- rience on the young, comparing the concern about social media to concern about video games, television, and bicycle safety. They point out, as does Cato fellow Jeffrey A. Singer, that the psychiatric profession has yet to designate “internet addiction” or “social media addiction” as a mental disorder in the authoritative Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5-TR).21 These con- servatives also maintain that calling for regulation undermines conservatives’ calls for parental empowerment on education or vaccines as well as personal parenting responsibility. In addition, some of the methods used to regulate children’s internet access pose the risk of unintended harms. For instance, age verification regulations would inevitably increase the amount of data collection involved, increasing privacy con- cerns. Users would have to submit to platforms proof of their age, which raises the risks of data breach or illegitimate data usage by the platforms or bad actors. Limited-government conservatives would prefer the FTC play an educational role instead. That might include best practices or educational programs to empower parents online. Antitrust Enforcement. As is evidenced by a relentless focus on bringing Big Tech lawsuits, state attorneys general (AGs) are far more responsive to their con- stituents than is the FTC. Such a “boots on the ground” approach would benefit the FTC enormously. Practically, this would mean establishing a distinct role in the FTC Chairman’s office focused on state AG cooperation and inviting state AGs to Washington, D.C., to discuss enforcement policy in key sectors under the FTC’s jurisdiction: Big Tech, hospital mergers, supermarket mergers, and so forth. FTC regional offices are substantially more in touch with local issues. Over the past few decades, the reach and influence of regional offices has shrunk dramati- cally. The FTC should consider returning authority to these offices. Some conservatives however are less supportive of this idea. Conservative enthusiasm for the idea of adding regional FTC offices to the states is a break from the majority conservative position. Endorsing the federal government as a pre- mier job creator runs counter to decades of conservative opinion that holds that New Deal agencies and subsequent government bodies should never have been created in the first place, and that their red tape and interference is a dominant cause of economic inefficiency. Republicans used to seethe when Democrats tried to move federal offices into the states. In the early 1990s, House Minority Whip Newt Gingrich fumed about Senator Robert Byrd’s campaign to transfer certain national intelligence facilities to West Virginia, calling it a “pure abuse of power.” Some contributors to this chapter would remind conservatives that the unseen mechanics of redistribution—by which taxpayer money paid to state employees is taken from taxpayers nationwide—is a drag on the economy of the entire country. Many conservatives fear that it would be impossible to uproot or even prune back

Federal Trade Commission

Strong
Vector: 73%
Pages: 908-910AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill directly updates and strengthens COPPA by expanding protections to teens, adding new personal information categories, imposing stricter disclosure rules, and enhancing FTC enforcement—core elements of the Project 2025 policy’s call to expand COPPA coverage, use constructive knowledge standards, and empower the FTC to protect children online."

Key themes:children's online privacyFTC enforcementparental consentCOPPA expansiondata collection restrictions

— 875 — Federal Trade Commission Protecting Children Online. The FTC has long protected children in a variety of different contexts. Internet platforms profit from obtaining information from children without parents’ knowledge or consent—and social media’s effect on the well-being of American children is well-documented. Around 2012, American teens experienced a dramatic decline in wellness. Depression, self-harm, suicide attempts, and suicide all increased sharply among U.S. adolescents between 2011 and 2019,16 with similar trends worldwide.17 The increase occurred at the same time that social media use moved from rare to ubiquitous among teens,18 making social media a prime suspect for the sudden rise in mental health issues among teens. In addition, excessive social media use is strongly linked to mental health issues among individuals. Several studies strongly support the notion that social media use is a cause, not just a correlation, of subjective well-being and poor mental health.19 Social media and other large platforms form millions of contracts every year with American children. And even though a minor can void most contracts into which he or she enters, most jurisdictions have laws that hold minors accountable for the benefits received under the contract. Thus, children can make enforceable contracts for which parents could end up bearing responsibility. Targeting chil- dren to create potentially harmful contracts or making parents responsible for such contractual relationships is an unfair trade practice. The FTC, therefore, has the authority, interest, and duty to protect children online from such contractual relationships. l The FTC should examine platforms’ advertising and contract- making with children as a deceptive or unfair trade practice, perhaps requiring written parental consent. Currently, the Child Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA)20 regulates the information internet firms can obtain from children. COPPA fails because it (1) only protects children under the age of 13, leaving older teenagers completely unprotected and (2) only prohibits platforms from collecting information from a child using “actual knowledge” rather than abiding by the “constructive knowledge” standard, which prohibits collecting information from a user reasonably assumed to be underage. The FTC has rulemaking authority under this statute but has done little with this authority, nor can it—given the statutory constraints. However, l The FTC can and should institute unfair trade practices proceedings against entities that enter into contracts with children without parental consent. Personal parental responsibility is, of course, key, but the law must respect, not undermine, lawful parental authority.

Department of Education

Moderate
Vector: 63%
Pages: 377-379AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"Both the bill and the Project 2025 section emphasize protecting children's privacy and strengthening parental rights regarding personal data, but the bill focuses on online commercial services while Project 2025 centers on educational records and curriculum oversight, resulting in only moderate thematic overlap."

Key themes:parental consentchildren's privacydata protection

— 344 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise pronouns). The federal government could demand that schools include curriculum or lessons regarding critical race or gender theory in a way that violates parental rights, especially if it requires minors to disclose information about their religious beliefs, or beliefs about race or gender in violation of the Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment (20 USC Sec. 1232h). To remedy the lack of clear and robust protection for parental rights, the next Administration should: l Work to pass a federal Parents’ Bill of Rights that restores parental rights to a “top-tier” right. Such legislation would give families a fair hearing in court when the federal government enforces any policy against parents in a way that undermines their right and responsibility to raise, educate, and care for their children. The law would require the government to satisfy “strict scrutiny”—the highest standard of judicial review—when the government infringes parental rights. l Further ensure that any regulations that could impact parental rights contain similar protections and require federal agencies to demonstrate that their action meets strict scrutiny before a final rule is promulgated. At the same time, Congress should also consider equipping parents with a private right of action. Two federal laws provide certain privacy protections for students attending educational institutions or programs funded by the department. The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) protects the privacy of student education records and allows parents and students over the age of 18 to inspect and review the student’s education records maintained by the school and to request corrections to those records. FERPA also authorizes a number of excep- tions to this records privacy protection that allow schools to disclose the student’s education records without the consent or knowledge of the parent or student. The Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment (PPRA) requires schools to obtain paren- tal consent before asking questions, including surveys, about political affiliations or beliefs; mental or psychological issues; sexual behaviors or attitudes; critical appraisals of family members; illegal or self-incriminating behavior; religious prac- tices or beliefs; privileged relationships, as with doctors and clergy; and family income, unless for program eligibility. The difficulty for parents is that FERPA and PPRA do not authorize a private right of action. If a school refuses to comply with either statute, the only remedy is for the parent or student (if over the age of 18) to file an administrative complaint with the U.S. Department of Education, which must then work with the school to obtain compliance before taking any action to suspend or terminate federal — 345 — Department of Education financial assistance. Investigations can take months if not years. The department has never suspended or terminated the funding for an educational institution or agency for violating FERPA or PPRA. In essence, Congress has granted parents and students important statutory rights without an effective remedy to assert those rights. l The next Administration should work with Congress to amend FERPA and PPRA to provide parents and students over the age of 18 years with a private right of action to seek injunctive and declaratory relief, together with attorneys’ fees and costs if a prevailing party, against educational institutions and agencies that violate rights enshrined in these statutes. This will empower parents and students, level the playing field between families and education bureaucracies, and encourage institutional compliance with these statutory requirements. Protect Parental Rights in Policy In addition to strengthening legal protections for parents, the next Adminis- tration should: l Prioritize legislation advancing such rights. Promising ideas have appeared in bills introduced in the 117th Congress such as H.R.8767, the Empowering Parents Act,15 sponsored by Representative Bob Good (R-VA); H.R. 6056, the Parents’ Bill of Rights Act,16 sponsored by Representative Julia Letlow (R-LA); and H.J.Res. 99,17 proposing an amendment to the Constitution relating to parental rights, sponsored by Representative Debbie Lesko (R-AZ). l These congressional actions should be carefully reviewed to make sure they complement state Parents' Bills of Rights, such as those passed in Georgia (2022), Florida (2021), Montana (2021), Wyoming (2017), Idaho (2015), Oklahoma (2014), Virginia (2013), and Arizona (2010). As documented by writers such as Abigail Shrier and others, the American Society of Plastic Surgeons documented a four-fold increase in the number of biological girls seeking gender surgery between 2016 and 2017. Larger increases were found in the U.K. from 2009 to 2019 and 2017 to 2018. These statistics and others point to a social contagion in which minor children, especially girls, are attempting to make life-altering decisions using puberty blockers and other hor- mone treatments and even surgeries to remove or alter vital body parts. Heritage Foundation research finds that providing easier access to such treatments and

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Full Policy Text

Related Bills