Colorado Outdoor Recreation and Economy Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/s/764
Last Updated: March 23, 2026

Sponsored by

Sen. Bennet, Michael F. [D-CO]

ID: B001267

Follow the money

The bill

Colorado Outdoor Recreation and Economy Act

S. 764, 119th Congress — read as touching Oil & Gas.

The sponsor

Sen. Bennet, Michael F. [D-CO]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$74,350 raised

24 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Public Lands, Forests, and Mining. Hearings held.

December 1, 2025

Introduced

Committee Review

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.

🗳️

Floor Action

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of Senators Bennet and Hickenlooper. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Colorado Outdoor Recreation and Economy Act (CORE) is a cleverly crafted bill that masquerades as an environmental conservation effort while actually serving the interests of special groups and politicians. Its primary objective is to expand wilderness areas, recreation management areas, and conservation areas in Colorado, all under the guise of promoting outdoor recreation and economic growth.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill designates new wilderness areas, including the Ptarmigan Peak Wilderness Additions, Holy Cross Wilderness Addition, Hoosier Ridge Wilderness, Tenmile Wilderness, and Eagles Nest Wilderness additions. It also establishes wildlife conservation areas and modifies existing national forest boundaries. The bill amends the Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993 to include these new designations.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are involved:

* Environmental groups, who will tout this as a victory for conservation (while ignoring the underlying motivations) * Outdoor recreation enthusiasts, who will benefit from expanded wilderness areas * Local communities, which may see some economic benefits from increased tourism * Politicians, who will use this bill to pad their environmental credentials and appease special interest groups

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a classic case of "greenwashing" – using environmental rhetoric to justify policies that benefit specific interests. The real impact will be:

* Increased access for outdoor recreation enthusiasts, which may lead to over-tourism and degradation of natural areas * Economic benefits for local communities, but potentially at the expense of environmental sustainability * Politicians scoring points with environmental groups while actually serving the interests of their donors and supporters

Now, let's get to the real diagnosis:

This bill is suffering from a bad case of "Environmental Lip Service Disease" (ELSD). The symptoms are clear: politicians using environmental rhetoric to justify policies that benefit special interest groups, while ignoring the underlying motivations and potential consequences.

The treatment? A healthy dose of skepticism and critical thinking. We need to look beyond the surface-level language and examine the real motivations behind this bill. Who benefits from these designations? What are the potential unintended consequences?

In conclusion, the Colorado Outdoor Recreation and Economy Act is a masterclass in legislative spin, designed to appease special interest groups while masquerading as an environmental conservation effort. Let's not be fooled by the rhetoric – we need to dig deeper to uncover the real motivations and implications of this bill.

Related Topics

Public Lands & Natural ResourcesWildlife & Endangered Species
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Sen. Bennet, Michael F. [D-CO]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$74,350
18 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$3,250
Committees
$0
Individuals
$71,100

No PAC contributions found

1
CHEROKEE NATION
2 transactions
$2,000
2
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
1 transaction
$1,000
3
QUILLER GALLERY LLC
1 transaction
$250

No committee contributions found

1
HEGYI, ALBERT
2 transactions
$6,600
2
JAMES, TATIANA B
2 transactions
$6,600
3
PRICE, H CHARLES
2 transactions
$6,600
4
ARNOLD, JOHN D
2 transactions
$6,600
5
FISHER, ROBERT J.
2 transactions
$6,600
6
BARRON, THOMAS A
1 transaction
$5,000
7
WALLINGER, DANIELLE
1 transaction
$5,000
8
WALLINGER, DIRK
1 transaction
$5,000
9
LEPRINO, TERRY LYNN
1 transaction
$3,300
10
SIE, JOHN J.
1 transaction
$3,300
11
JORDAN, KIMBERLEY B
1 transaction
$3,300
12
KAUFELT, JONATHAN D
1 transaction
$3,300
13
TOUFF, MICHAEL
1 transaction
$3,300
14
FATO, LUCIANA
1 transaction
$3,300
15
KAHL, JEFFREY
1 transaction
$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 1 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Sen. Hickenlooper, John W. [D-CO]

ID: H000273

Top Contributors

10

1
THE CHICKASAW NATION
OrganizationADA, OK
$1,300
Dec 12, 2023
2
THE CHICKASAW NATION
OrganizationADA, OK
$1,200
Dec 12, 2023
3
THE CHICKASAW NATION
OrganizationADA, OK
$900
Dec 31, 2023
4
ALLHASSANI, MEHDI
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIESOPERATIONS
IndividualPALO ALTO, CA
$3,300
Nov 25, 2023
5
SANKAR, SHYAM
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIESDIRECTOR
IndividualGREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO
$3,300
Nov 25, 2023
6
CARSON, RUSSELL
NOT EMPLOYEDNOT EMPLOYED
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$3,300
Nov 17, 2023
7
SANKAR, SHYAM
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIESDIRECTOR
IndividualGREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO
$3,300
Nov 25, 2023
8
CARSON, RUSSELL
NOT EMPLOYEDNOT EMPLOYED
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$3,300
Nov 17, 2023
9
GATES, WILLIAM H. III
BILL & MELINDA GATES FOUNDATIONPHILANTHROPIST
IndividualREDMOND, WA
$3,300
Oct 19, 2023
10
JAIN, AKASH
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIESEXECUTIVE
IndividualOAKLAND, CA
$3,300
Nov 26, 2023

Donor Network - Sen. Bennet, Michael F. [D-CO]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 45 nodes and 27 connections (58 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $77,750

Top Donors - Sen. Bennet, Michael F. [D-CO]

Showing top 18 donors by contribution amount

3 Orgs15 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 9 harmed.

  • Oil & Gasconfidence 0.90

    Title III withdraws the Thompson Divide area from mineral leasing laws, including oil and gas leases, and cancels existing leases upon relinquishment (Sec. 303, 304). This directly harms oil and gas producers by removing access to federal mineral rights.

  • Agribusinessconfidence 0.90

    Title III withdraws the Thompson Divide area from mineral leasing and other disposal laws to protect agricultural, ranching, and ecological values, which directly harms agribusiness interests that might seek mineral development or resource extraction in the area. Section 303(a) explicitly states the withdrawal is to protect agricultural and ranching values.

  • Coal Miningconfidence 0.85

    Title III withdraws the Thompson Divide area from mineral leasing laws, which includes coal mining operations, and cancels leases upon relinquishment (Sec. 303, 304). This harms coal mining by preventing new leases and terminating existing ones in the area.

  • Title III's withdrawal of the Thompson Divide area protects ranching values, which would limit land available for meat and dairy processing operations that rely on grazing or feed production from the area. Section 301(1) states the purpose is to protect agricultural and ranching values.

  • The withdrawal of federal lands from mineral leasing and mineral materials laws (Sec. 303, 205(h), 202) affects pipeline and midstream infrastructure development that relies on federal rights-of-way and mineral access, harming energy infrastructure companies.

  • Crop Producersconfidence 0.80

    Title III's withdrawal protects agricultural values, which would limit land available for crop production in the Thompson Divide area. Section 301(1) explicitly mentions protecting agricultural values as a purpose of the withdrawal.

+ 3 more industries not shown.

Related Bills