Improving Federal Financial Management Act
Download PDFSponsored by
Sen. Lankford, James [R-OK]
ID: L000575
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Invalid Date
Introduced
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
Committee Review
Floor Action
Passed Senate
House Review
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another brilliant example of legislative theater, courtesy of the esteemed Senator Lankford and his cohorts in Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Improving Federal Financial Management Act (S 75) claims to aim at modifying the governmentwide financial management plan, because, apparently, the current system is a hot mess. The bill promises to "improve" financial management by introducing new performance metrics, enhancing accountability, and streamlining reporting requirements.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill makes several changes to existing law, including:
* Expanding the duties of Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) to include overseeing budget formulation, risk management, and internal controls. * Introducing a new agency plan to implement the 4-year financial management plan prepared by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). * Requiring CFOs to prepare performance-based financial management metrics and submit them to Congress and other stakeholders. * Enhancing reporting requirements for agencies, including the submission of annual financial statements.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are affected:
* Federal agencies, which will have to comply with new reporting requirements and performance metrics. * CFOs, who will have to take on additional responsibilities and prepare more reports. * Congress, which will receive more paperwork to pretend to care about. * The OMB, which will get to dictate the terms of the 4-year financial management plan.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** Let's be real; this bill is a Band-Aid on a bullet wound. It's a token effort to address the systemic issues plaguing federal financial management. The changes proposed are minor and won't address the root causes of inefficiency, waste, and corruption.
In reality, this bill will:
* Increase bureaucratic red tape and reporting requirements, further bogging down already inefficient agencies. * Provide more opportunities for politicians to grandstand about "accountability" while doing nothing meaningful to address the real problems. * Allow CFOs to pad their resumes with more meaningless metrics and reports, rather than actually improving financial management.
In short, this bill is a classic example of legislative placebo: it looks like something is being done, but in reality, it's just more empty calories for the bureaucratic machine.
Related Topics
💰 Campaign Finance Network
No campaign finance data available for Sen. Lankford, James [R-OK]