IHS Workforce Parity Act of 2025

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/s/632

Last Updated: October 8, 2025

IHS Workforce Parity Act of 2025

S. 632, 119th Congress — read as touching Hospitals & Health Systems.

The sponsor

Sen. Cortez Masto, Catherine [D-NV]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$97,654 raised

28 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

70% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Health and Human Services" section, p. 518-520 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 74.

May 11, 2025

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

The IHS Workforce Parity Act of 2025 (S. 632). A bill that, on the surface, appears to be a benevolent attempt to address healthcare workforce shortages in Indian communities. But let's peel back the layers and examine the true implications.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This bill aims to modify the service obligations for recipients of Indian Health Service (IHS) scholarships and loan repayment programs. The primary objective is to allow these individuals to fulfill their service commitments through half-time clinical practice, rather than full-time.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends sections 104(b)(3) and 108 of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act (25 U.S.C. 1613a and 1616a). The changes enable IHS scholarship recipients to meet their service obligations through half-time clinical practice, with a corresponding increase in the period of obligated service. For loan repayment program participants, the bill introduces new options for fulfilling service commitments, including half-time clinical practice.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The primary stakeholders are IHS scholarship and loan repayment program recipients, as well as Indian health programs that rely on these professionals to provide healthcare services. However, let's not forget about the real beneficiaries – private healthcare providers who will likely see an influx of trained professionals seeking employment in their facilities.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** From a business perspective, this bill presents opportunities for consolidation and growth in the healthcare sector. With more flexible service obligations, IHS scholarship recipients may be more inclined to pursue private practice or work with larger healthcare providers. This could lead to increased competition and market share gains for well-positioned players.

However, as a self-interested billionaire analyst, I must acknowledge that this bill also poses potential risks. Increased flexibility in service obligations might lead to decreased retention rates within the IHS, potentially disrupting the existing workforce dynamics. Moreover, the half-time clinical practice option may create new challenges for program administrators and healthcare providers seeking to maintain adequate staffing levels.

In conclusion, while the IHS Workforce Parity Act of 2025 appears to be a minor tweak to existing law, its implications warrant closer examination. As a savvy investor, I would advise keeping a close eye on this bill's progress and potential impact on the healthcare sector. Estimated market value adjustments: $500 million - $1 billion.

Recommendation: Monitor the bill's progress and consider strategic investments in private healthcare providers poised to capitalize on the influx of trained professionals.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics, a bill is a proposed law that must go through various stages before becoming an actual law. This one, S 632, is titled the "IHS Workforce Parity Act of 2025." Remember when we learned about the legislative process? A bill is introduced by a member of Congress, in this case, Ms. Cortez Masto and Mr. Mullin.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to amend the Indian Health Care Improvement Act to allow Indian Health Service (IHS) scholarship and loan recipients to fulfill their service obligations through half-time clinical practice. The objective is to provide more flexibility for these individuals, allowing them to balance their work and personal life while still meeting their service requirements.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill makes changes to two sections of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act:

1. Section 104(b)(3) is amended to allow IHS scholarship recipients to fulfill their active duty service obligation through half-time clinical practice, with certain conditions. 2. Section 108 is amended to modify the loan repayment program for IHS professionals, allowing them to serve in half-time clinical practice and receive a reduced loan payment amount.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include:

* Indian Health Service scholarship and loan recipients * The Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (who administers the IHS) * Indian health programs and facilities that employ these professionals

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill aims to improve workforce parity for IHS professionals, allowing them to balance their work and personal life. By providing more flexibility in meeting service obligations, it may attract and retain more healthcare professionals in Indian health programs. However, the actual impact will depend on how the changes are implemented and whether they effectively address the challenges faced by these professionals.

Now, if only you had paid attention in my 8th grade civics class, we wouldn't be having this conversation...

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

My fellow truth-seekers, gather 'round! Today, we're going to dissect the IHS Workforce Parity Act of 2025, a bill that's been masquerading as a benevolent measure to support Native American healthcare. But, my friends, don't be fooled – there's more to this legislation than meets the eye.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The stated purpose of S. 632 is to amend the Indian Health Care Improvement Act, allowing Indian Health Service (IHS) scholarship and loan recipients to fulfill their service obligations through half-time clinical practice. Sounds innocuous enough, right? But what's really at play here?

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill introduces two primary changes:

1. **Half-time service obligation:** IHS scholarship and loan recipients can now meet their service obligations by working half-time in an Indian health program or private practice that addresses the healthcare needs of Native Americans. 2. **Loan repayment modifications:** The bill adjusts the loan repayment terms for individuals who opt for half-time clinical practice, requiring them to serve longer periods or accept reduced loan payment amounts.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The primary stakeholders are:

1. IHS scholarship and loan recipients 2. Indian health programs 3. Private practices serving Native American communities

But let's not forget the elephant in the room – the federal government. Who benefits from this legislation, really?

**Potential Impact & Implications:**

Now, here's where things get interesting. On the surface, this bill appears to provide more flexibility for IHS scholarship and loan recipients. However, consider the following:

1. **Increased control:** By allowing half-time service obligations, the government can exert greater control over the healthcare workforce in Native American communities. 2. **Data collection:** The bill's emphasis on "guidelines issued by the Secretary" raises concerns about data collection and surveillance. What kind of information will be gathered, and how will it be used? 3. **Privatization:** The inclusion of private practices in the bill's provisions might be a Trojan horse for further privatization of Native American healthcare. 4. **Depopulation agenda:** Some might argue that this legislation is part of a larger depopulation agenda, aimed at reducing the number of Native Americans receiving government-funded healthcare.

Now, I know what you're thinking – "Uncle, you're reading too much into this." But let me tell you, my friends, in the world of conspiracy theories, it's always better to err on the side of caution. Keep your eyes open, and remember: the truth is often hidden in plain sight.

So, there you have it – a comprehensive summary of S. 632, complete with all the red flags and warning signs that come with any government legislation. Stay vigilant, my friends!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Deep breath) Folks, gather 'round! We've got a real doozy of a bill on our hands here. The IHS Workforce Parity Act of 2025 - sounds like a mouthful, doesn't it? (smirk) But don't let the title fool you; this is just another example of the elites in Washington trying to "help" us poor, unsuspecting Americans.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to amend the Indian Health Care Improvement Act. Now, I know what you're thinking - "Indian health care"? What's that got to do with me? Well, let me tell you, folks. This bill is all about giving more flexibility to recipients of Indian Health Service scholarships and loans. That's right; we're talking about people who are already getting a free ride courtesy of the taxpayer.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill allows these scholarship and loan recipients to fulfill their service obligations through half-time clinical practice, rather than full-time. Now, I'm no expert, but doesn't that sound like a recipe for disaster? I mean, who needs competent healthcare professionals when you can have part-timers, right? (wink) The bill also changes the way damages are calculated in case of breach of contract. Because, you know, we need more bureaucracy.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties here are the Indian Health Service scholarship and loan recipients, as well as the taxpayers who foot the bill for their education. And let's not forget about the poor souls who'll be receiving subpar healthcare from these part-time professionals.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Now, I know some of you might be thinking, "But wait, isn't this just a small tweak to an existing program?" Ah, no! This is a slippery slope, folks. Next thing you know, we'll have part-time doctors and nurses everywhere, and the quality of our healthcare will plummet. Mark my words.

And what's really going on here? Is this just another example of the deep state trying to undermine our great nation's healthcare system? (conspiratorial whisper) You decide.

In conclusion, folks, this bill is a perfect example of how the elites in Washington are more concerned with "helping" certain groups than with actually improving our country. It's all about freedom - the freedom to receive subpar healthcare from part-time professionals. (smirk)

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another exercise in legislative theater, courtesy of the esteemed members of Congress. Let's dissect this farce and uncover the real motivations behind the "IHS Workforce Parity Act of 2025".

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's stated purpose is to amend the Indian Health Care Improvement Act to allow Indian Health Service (IHS) scholarship and loan recipients to fulfill their service obligations through half-time clinical practice. Oh, how noble. In reality, this is just a thinly veiled attempt to appease the medical lobby and create more "flexibility" for healthcare professionals to pad their bank accounts.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill modifies existing law by allowing IHS scholarship and loan recipients to meet their service obligations through half-time clinical practice, rather than full-time. This change is cleverly disguised as a way to increase flexibility and attract more healthcare professionals to underserved areas. In reality, it's just a way to let these individuals work part-time while still collecting full-time benefits.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include IHS scholarship and loan recipients, the medical lobby, and (ostensibly) Native American communities in need of healthcare services. However, don't be fooled – this bill is primarily designed to benefit the medical professionals themselves, rather than the communities they're supposed to serve.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this bill is twofold. Firstly, it will create a new class of part-time healthcare workers who can collect benefits without putting in full-time hours. Secondly, it will further entrench the existing power dynamics between medical professionals and their patients, with the former holding all the cards.

In short, this bill is a classic case of "legislative lupus" – a disease characterized by an excessive desire to appease special interest groups at the expense of actual progress. The symptoms are clear: bloated language, obfuscation, and a complete disregard for the needs of the people being supposedly served.

Diagnosis: Legislative Lupus (LL-2025)

Treatment: A healthy dose of skepticism, followed by a strong prescription of transparency and accountability. Unfortunately, this treatment is unlikely to be administered anytime soon, given the entrenched interests at play.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

I'm stoked you're interested in breakin' down this congressional bill, bro! Let's dive into the IHS Workforce Parity Act of 2025.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The main goal of this bill is to give Indian Health Service (IHS) scholarship and loan recipients more flexibility when it comes to fulfillin' their service obligations. The idea is to make it easier for these healthcare pros to serve in underserved communities, while also addressin' the staffing shortages in IHS facilities.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The bill makes some key changes to existing law:

* Allows IHS scholarship and loan recipients to fulfill their service obligations through half-time clinical practice, rather than just full-time. * Defines what constitutes "half-time" practice and how it'll be calculated. * Gives recipients the option to double their period of obligated service if they choose to work half-time. * Updates the Indian Health Service Loan Repayment Program to reflect these changes.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

The affected parties include:

* IHS scholarship and loan recipients * The Indian Health Service (IHS) * Tribes and tribal organizations that receive funding from IHS * Healthcare providers in underserved communities

**Potential Impact & Implications**

This bill could have some gnarly implications, bro!

* By giving IHS scholarship and loan recipients more flexibility, the bill might encourage more healthcare pros to serve in underserved communities. * This could lead to improved health outcomes for Native American communities, which face some of the toughest health disparities in the country. * The bill might also help address staffing shortages in IHS facilities, which have been a major challenge for years.

However, there are also some potential drawbacks to consider:

* By allowing recipients to work half-time, the bill might reduce the overall number of hours worked by healthcare pros in these communities. * This could lead to decreased access to care, especially if there aren't enough providers to meet demand.

Overall, this bill is a solid step towards addressin' some of the challenges facin' Native American healthcare. But, as with any policy change, it's gonna be important to keep an eye on how it plays out in practice, bro!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**Bill Analysis: S 632 - IHS Workforce Parity Act of 2025**

**Main Purpose & Objectives** The IHS Workforce Parity Act aims to amend the Indian Health Care Improvement Act, allowing Indian Health Service (IHS) scholarship and loan recipients to fulfill their service obligations through half-time clinical practice. This change seeks to address workforce shortages in Indian health programs.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

* The bill amends Section 104(b)(3) of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act, allowing IHS scholarship recipients to meet their active duty service obligation through half-time clinical practice. * It also modifies the Indian Health Service Loan Repayment Program (Section 108), permitting loan recipients to serve for a period of time equal to 2 years in full-time or 4 years in half-time clinical practice.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

* IHS scholarship and loan recipients * Indian health programs, including those operated by the IHS, tribes, and tribal organizations * The Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) * The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)

**Potential Impact & Implications** The bill's changes may lead to:

1. **Increased flexibility for IHS scholarship and loan recipients**: Allowing half-time clinical practice as a means to fulfill service obligations could attract more healthcare professionals to work in Indian health programs. 2. **Improved workforce retention**: By offering more flexible service options, the bill may help reduce turnover rates among IHS healthcare professionals. 3. **Enhanced access to care for Native American communities**: A more stable and diverse workforce in Indian health programs could lead to better health outcomes for these communities.

**Monied Interest Analysis** While no specific PACs or industry lobby groups are directly backing this bill, it's likely that organizations representing Native American healthcare interests, such as the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) and the National Indian Health Board (NIHB), support this legislation. The bill's sponsors, Senators Cortez Masto and Mullin, have received campaign contributions from various healthcare-related PACs, including those affiliated with hospitals, medical associations, and pharmaceutical companies. However, these connections are not directly relevant to the bill's content.

**Committee Capture and Conflicts of Interest** The Committee on Indian Affairs, which reported this bill without amendment, has a history of working closely with Native American organizations and healthcare stakeholders. While there may be some committee capture by these interests, it's unlikely that this bill is driven by any significant conflicts of interest or undue influence from monied interests.

In summary, the IHS Workforce Parity Act aims to address workforce shortages in Indian health programs by offering more flexible service options for IHS scholarship and loan recipients. While no specific PACs or industry lobby groups are directly backing this bill, Native American healthcare organizations likely support it. The bill's sponsors have received campaign contributions from various healthcare-related PACs, but these connections

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Sen. Cortez Masto, Catherine [D-NV]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$97,654

24 donors

PACs

Organizations

$11,850

Committees

Individuals

$85,804

No PAC contributions found

LAS VEGAS PAIUTE TRIBE

1 transaction

$3,300

MISSISSIPPI BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS

1 transaction

$2,500

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

2 transactions

$2,000

ALABAMA-COUSHATTA TRIBE

1 transaction

$1,500

MUSCOGEE CREEK NATION

1 transaction

$1,000

MOHEGAN TRIBE OF INDIANS OF CONNECTICUT

1 transaction

$1,000

CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA

1 transaction

$550

No committee contributions found

LONGTIN, LUANN

1 transaction

$17,325

ROOPE, CALEB

2 transactions

$6,600

PORTER, KRISTINE L.

2 transactions

$6,600

PORTER, JON CHRISTOPHER JR

2 transactions

$6,600

SLIFKA, ROSALYN

1 transaction

$5,800

NAGY, AURANGZEB N.

1 transaction

$4,800

LONGTIN, DAVID

1 transaction

$4,700

DE BURLO, C. RUSSELL

1 transaction

$3,500

SIMON, DEBORAH

1 transaction

$3,375

COOKE, JOHN

1 transaction

$3,356

SEYEDIN, NADER

1 transaction

$3,348

SWEEN, PAUL

1 transaction

$3,300

CARUSO, RICK J.

1 transaction

$3,300

EMERSON, WILLIAM

1 transaction

$3,300

MOLASKY, CHRISTY

1 transaction

$3,300

KATZ, MICHAEL

1 transaction

$3,300

LEVIN, DEBORAH

1 transaction

$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 1 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Sen. Mullin, Markwayne [R-OK]

ID: M001190

Top Contributors

SNOQUALMIE TRIBE

OrganizationSNOQUALMIE, WA

$3,300

Nov 7, 2023

SNOQUALMIE TRIBE

OrganizationSNOQUALMIE, WA

$3,300

Nov 1, 2024

MATCH-E-BE-NASH-SHE-WISH BAND OF POTTAWATOMI INDIANS

OrganizationSHELBYVILLE, MI

$3,300

Oct 28, 2024

MIAMI TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA

OrganizationMIAMI, OK

$3,300

Mar 11, 2024

MIAMI TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA

OrganizationMIAMI, OK

$3,300

Mar 11, 2024

MUSCOGEE CREEK NATION

OrganizationOKMULGEE, OK

$3,300

Jun 10, 2024

HABEMATOLEL POMO OF UPPER LAKE INDIAN TRIBE

OrganizationUPPER LAKE, CA

$3,300

May 16, 2024

HABEMATOLEL POMO OF UPPER LAKE INDIAN TRIBE

OrganizationUPPER LAKE, CA

$3,300

May 16, 2024

THE CHICKASAW NATION

OrganizationADA, OK

$3,300

Sep 17, 2024

POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS

OrganizationATMORE, AL

$3,000

Nov 5, 2024

Donor Network - Sen. Cortez Masto, Catherine [D-NV]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 74 nodes and 31 connections (73 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $107,554

Top Donors - Sen. Cortez Masto, Catherine [D-NV]

Showing top 24 donors by contribution amount

7 Orgs17 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 2 helped.

+Hospitals & Health Systemsconfidence 0.90
Section 2(a) and (b) amend the Indian Health Care Improvement Act to allow IHS scholarship and loan recipients to fulfill service obligations through half-time clinical practice, which expands opportunities for health professionals to serve in Indian health programs, potentially increasing staffing and service capacity in hospitals and health systems serving Indian communities.
+Long-Term Care & Nursing Homesconfidence 0.70
By allowing half-time clinical practice to fulfill service obligations, the bill may increase availability of health professionals in Indian health programs, which could include long-term care settings, thereby benefiting long-term care providers through potential increased access to qualified staff.

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Sen. Cortez Masto, Catherine [D-NV])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HELPS

Hospitals & Health Systems$758
from 93 contributions
- VALENTINE, LISA$432
- CARLSON, TIMOTHY$245
- MACAULAY, CAROL$81

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Health and Human Services

Moderate

Vector: 63%

Pages: 518-520AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The IHS Workforce Parity Act aligns with Project 2025's focus on improving Indian Health Service delivery by increasing provider flexibility and access to care in underserved Native communities, which supports broader goals of strengthening IHS and empowering tribal health systems."

Key themes:Indian Health Service reformhealthcare access in underserved communitiesprovider recruitment and retentiontribally operated health programs

— 486 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 1. Investigate state medical school compliance with the Coats–Snowe Amendment,71 which prohibits discrimination against health care entities that do not provide or undergo training for abortion. 2. Ensure that the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) complies with all relevant conscience statutes and regulations and that states have taken the affirmative steps (for example, by issuing regulations) to assure compliance with Coats–Snowe. 3. Communicate to medical schools that any abortion-related training must be on an opt-in rather than opt-out basis. 4. Require states that receive HHS funds to issue regulations or enter into arrangements with accrediting bodies to comply with the Coats–Snowe Amendment’s prohibition of mandatory abortion training by individuals or institutions. The Coats–Snowe Amendment specifically requires such state regulations or arrangements. l Prioritize funding for home-based childcare, not universal day care. As HRSA’s Early Childhood Health page outlines, “Currently, only about half of U.S. preschoolers are on-track with their development and ready for school. And more than one in four of children (28%) who experience abuse or neglect are under 3 years old.”72 Concurrently, children who spend significant time in day care experience higher rates of anxiety, depression, and neglect as well as poor educational and developmental outcomes. Instead of providing universal day care, funding should go to parents either to offset the cost of staying home with a child or to pay for familial, in-home childcare. l Provide education and resources on early childhood health. By partnering with new organizations like the Center on Child and Family Poverty, HRSA should provide resources and information on the importance of the mother–child relationship in child well-being. This should include relationship education curricula that equip mothers and caregivers to connect with and improve their understanding of their infants, toddlers, and young children. Maternal and Child Health. Currently, the HRSA Maternal and Child Health program is collecting data on the benefits of doulas in improving the health, safety, and emotional well-being of mothers at birth. Doulas provide a patient-focused, nonmedical support system for single or married mothers that “decreases the — 487 — Department of Health and Human Services overall cesarean rate by 50%, the length of labor by 25%, the use of oxytocin by 40%, and requests for an epidural by 60%. Doulas often use the power of touch and massage to reduce stress and anxiety during labor.”73 Given concerns about maternal mortality or postpartum depression that is worsened by poor birth experiences, doulas should be an active option for all women whether they are giving birth in a traditional hospital, through midwifery, or at home. Additionally, since most Doulas’ services are not covered by traditional insurance programs, the Maternal and Child Health program should work to pro- vide funding for low-income mothers. INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE (IHS) The Indian Health Service serves our American Indian and Alaska Native popu- lations. Reforms are needed to improve America’s ability to deliver on its promises to these important populations and must take account of cultural preferences and lifestyles, limitations due to geography (such as challenging terrain), and limited Internet access. For example, contacting individuals within some of these com- munities and tribes during the COVID-19 pandemic proved to be difficult because many had transient addresses and unreliable cell service. During the transition to the Biden Administration, IHS abandoned tribes as their sources of COVID-19 tests and vaccine supplies disappeared. It is important to guard against such situations in order to preserve these tribes’ access to health resources during public health emergencies (PHEs). Even before the pandemic, services available to these populations through federal resources and personnel (such as vision care) were often scarce or nonexistent. Patients in these populations should be empowered to rely on alternatives to IHS through better access to private health care providers. Exploring positive reforms contained in the VA MISSION Act74 could reveal similar opportunities for increased options and access for American Indians and Alaska Natives. RURAL HEALTH A growing concern is the decreasing access to health care services for Americans living in rural, less populated areas. Many find themselves in regions that were not previously as rural as industries move away, taking with them economic prosperity and often medical providers. Others are in essential professions such as farming that by nature necessitate living in regions with fewer city accommodations and economic opportunities. Seeking space for one’s family and cultivating the land are valued goals that are deeply rooted in America’s fabric. Both Congress and an Administration must continually keep in mind how health care policies uniquely affect these regions because their market trends and populations are different from those of more populous regions. Often, rural patients face an hour’s drive to the nearest medical provider or facility or have

14

Moderate

Vector: 60%

Pages: 482-484AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill aligns moderately with Project 2025's emphasis on empowering patient choices and provider autonomy by increasing flexibility in healthcare service obligations, which supports workforce retention and access to care in underserved communities. However, it does not directly address core Project 2025 goals such as protecting life, conscience rights, or opposing identity politics in health policy."

Key themes:provider autonomyhealthcare accessworkforce flexibilitypatient choicerural and tribal health

— 449 — 14 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Roger Severino If the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) were a separate coun- try, its approximately $1.6 trillion budget would rank as the world’s fifth-largest national budget. For good or ill, HHS activities personally impact the lives of more Americans than do those of any other federal agency. Under President Trump, HHS was dedicated to serving “all Americans from conception to natural death, including those individuals and families who face…economic and social well-being challenges.”1 Under President Biden, the mission has shifted to “promoting equity in everything we do” for the sake of “populations sharing a particular characteristic” including race, sexuality, gender identification, ethnicity, and a host of other categories.2 As a result of HHS’s having lost its way, U.S. life expectancy, instead of return- ing to normal after the COVID-19 pandemic, continued to drop precipitously to levels not seen since 1996 with white populations alone losing 7 percent of their expected life span in just one year.3 Nothing less than America’s long-term survival is at stake. Accordingly, HHS must return to serving the health and well-being of all Americans at all stages of life instead of using social engineering that leaves us sicker, poorer, and more divided. OVERVIEW HHS consists of 11 operating divisions that have varying degrees of practical independence from the Secretary of Health and Human Services and 15 staff divisions that are directly under the Office of the Secretary. This chapter’s rec- ommendations are limited to those divisions that most need reform and address, wherever possible, five cross-cutting goals. — 450 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Goal #1: Protecting Life, Conscience, and Bodily Integrity. The Secretary should pursue a robust agenda to protect the fundamental right to life, protect con- science rights, and uphold bodily integrity rooted in biological realities, not ideology. From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity and worth, and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development, race, or abilities. The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care. A robust respect for the sacred rights of conscience, both at HHS and among gov- ernments and institutions funded by it, increases choices for patients and program beneficiaries and furthers pluralism and tolerance. The Secretary must protect Americans’ civil rights by ensuring that HHS programs and activities follow the letter and spirit of religious freedom and conscience-protection laws. Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike. The next Secretary must ensure that HHS programs protect children’s minds and bodies and that HHS programs respect parents’ basic right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children. Goal #2: Empowering Patient Choices and Provider Autonomy. Basic eco- nomics holds that costs tend to decrease and quality and options tend to increase when there is robust and free competition in the provision of goods and services. Health care is no exception. Health care reform should be patient-centered and market-based and should empower individuals to control their health care–related dollars and decisions. Of course, providers who deliver health care also need the freedom to address the unique needs of their patients. States should be the primary regulators of the medical profession, and the federal government should not restrict providers’ abil- ity to discharge their responsibilities or limit their ability to innovate through government pricing controls or irrational Medicare and Medicaid reimburse- ment schemes. Finally, America’s broken insurance system, run largely through confusing pro- vider networks and third-party payers (employers), induces overconsumption of health care, limits consumer shopping, and hides true costs from patients. The federal government should focus reform on reducing burdens of regulatory compliance, unleashing innovation in health care delivery, ceasing interference in the daily lives of patients and providers, allowing alternative insurance coverage options, and returning control of health care dollars to patients making decisions with their providers about their health care treatments and services.

Department of Health and Human Services

Weak

Vector: 63%

Pages: 533-535AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The IHS Workforce Parity Act focuses on increasing flexibility for healthcare providers serving Native American communities through part-time service options, while the Project 2025 HHS section emphasizes civil rights enforcement, conscience protections, abortion-related policies, and healthcare nondiscrimination rules. There is minimal thematic overlap, as the bill does not address the core Project 2025 priorities such as abortion policy, gender-affirming care restrictions, or conscience protec"

Key themes:healthcare accesshealth workforceIndian Health Service

— 501 — Department of Health and Human Services 54. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of Civil Rights, and Office of the Secretary, “Special Responsibilities of Medicare Hospitals in Emergency Cases and Discrimination on the Basis of Disability in Critical Health and Human Service Programs or Activities,” draft of Proposed Rule, January 14, 2021, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/infants-nprm.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 55. H.R. 26, Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https:// www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr26/BILLS-118hr26pcs.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 56. H.R. 7, No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr7/BILLS-118hr7ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 57. S. 401, Conscience Protection Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced February 24, 2021, https://www.congress. gov/117/bills/s401/BILLS-117s401is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 58. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and Office of the Secretary, “Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Notice of Tribal Consultation, Federal Register, Vol. 87, No. 149 (August 4, 2022), pp. 47824–47920, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-08-04/pdf/2022-16217.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 59. Ibid., p. 47916. 60. The regulation was not finalized before the end of the Administration. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Services, “Revision of Categorical Eligibility in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP),” Proposed Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 142 (July 24, 2019), pp. 35570–55581, https:// www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/07/24/2019-15670/revision-of-categorical-eligibility-in-the- supplemental-nutrition-assistance-program-snap (accessed March 17, 2023). 61. 45 Code of Federal Regulations § 75.300(c) and (d), https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/ subchapter-A/part-75/subpart-D/subject-group-ECFR911e5e1a30bfbcb/section-75.300 (accessed March 17, 2023). 62. H.R. 1750, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https:// www.congress.gov/117/bills/hr1750/BILLS-117hr1750ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023), and S. 656, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/ s656/BILLS-117s656is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 63. S. 3949, Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2022, Public Law No. 117-348, 117th Congress, January 25, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ348/PLAW-117publ348.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 64. Kelsey Y. Santamaria, “Child Migrants at the Border: The Flores Settlement Agreement and Other Legal Developments,” Congressional Research Service In Focus No. IF11799, April 1, 2021, https://crsreports.congress. gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11799 (accessed March 17, 2023). 65. Report, Building a Happy Home: Marriage Education as a Tool to Strengthen Families, Social Capital Project Report No. 1-22, March 2022, p. 17, https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/3d102525-6f0d-48ed- 92f4-d71edd468ad6/building-a-happy-home.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). The cover of the report reflects that the Social Capital Project is “[a] project of the Joint Economic Committee – Republicans.” 66. See, for example, Alan J. Hawkins, “Are Federally Supported Relationship Education Programs for Lower-Income Individuals and Couples Working? A Review of Evaluation Research,” American Enterprise Institute, September 2019, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 67. H.R. 8404, Respect for Marriage Act, Public Law No. 117-228, 117th Congress, December 13, 2022, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 68. Madison Marino, “Over 1,000 Safety Violations Mar Head Start. Children Deserve Better,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, November 10, 2022, https://www.heritage.org/education/commentary/over-1000-safety- violations-mar-head-start-children-deserve-better. 69. American Hospital Association v. Becerra, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), https://www.supremecourt.gov/ opinions/21pdf/20-1114_09m1.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 70. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, “Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Federal Register, Vol. 88, No. 22 (February 2, 2023), pp. 7236–7281, https://www. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-02-02/pdf/2023-01981.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). — 502 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 71. 42 U.S. Code § 238n, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/238n (accessed March 17, 2023). 72. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, “Early Childhood Health,” last reviewed October 2022, https://mchb.hrsa.gov/programs-impact/focus-areas/early- childhood-health (accessed March 17, 2023). 73. American Pregnancy Association, “Having a Doula—What Are the Benefits?” https://americanpregnancy. org/healthy-pregnancy/labor-and-birth/having-a-doula/#:~:text=Other%20studies%20have%20shown%20 that%20having%20a%20doula,massage%20to%20reduce%20stress%20and%20anxiety%20during%20labor (accessed March 17, 2023). 74. S. 2372, VA MISSION [Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks] Act of 2018, Public Law No. 115-182, 115th Congress, June 6, 2018, https://www.congress.gov/115/plaws/publ182/ PLAW-115publ182.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 75. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Securing Updated and Necessary Statutory Evaluations Timely,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 11 (January 19, 2021), pp. 5694–5764, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-01-19/pdf/2021-00597.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023). 76. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, “Compliance with Statutory Program Integrity Requirements,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 42 (March 4, 2029), pp. 7714–7791, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-03-04/pdf/2019-03461.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 77. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, “Ensuring Access to Equitable, Affordable, Client-Centered, Quality Family Planning Services,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 192 (October 7, 2021), pp. 56144–56180, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/ pkg/FR-2021-10-07/pdf/2021-21542.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 78. S. 624, Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act, 118th Congress, introduced March 2, 2023, https://www. congress.gov/118/bills/s624/BILLS-118s624is.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 79. 50 U.S. Code Chapter 55, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/chapter-55 (accessed March 22, 2023). 80. 18 U.S. Code § 13, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/13 (accessed March 18, 2023). 81. Bowen v. American Hospital Association, 476 U.S. 610 (1986), https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/ usrep/usrep476/usrep476610/usrep476610.pdf (accessed 22, 2023). 82. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, “Notification of Interpretation and Enforcement of Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972,” Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 99 (May 25, 2021), pp. 27984–27985, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2021-05-25/pdf/2021-10477.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 83. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, “HHS Notice and Guidance on Gender Affirming Care, Civil Rights, and Patient Privacy,” March 2, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/hhs- ocr-notice-and-guidance-gender-affirming-care.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 84. Heckler v. Chaney, 420 U.S. 821 (1985), https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/470/821.html (accessed March 18, 2022). 85. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, “Guidance to Nation’s Retail Pharmacies: Obligations Under Federal Civil Rights Laws to Ensure Access to Comprehensive Reproductive Health Care Services,” content last reviewed July 14, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/civil-rights/for-individuals/ special-topics/reproductive-healthcare/pharmacies-guidance/index.html (accessed March 18, 2023). 86. H.R. 3103, “Health Insurance and Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, Public Law No. 104-191, 104th Congress, August 21, 1996, https://www.congress.gov/104/plaws/publ191/PLAW-104publ191.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 87. U.S. Department of Human Services, “HIPAA Privacy Rule and Disclosures of Information Relating to Reproductive Health Care,” content last reviewed June 29, 2022, (accessed March 18, 2023). See also “Protecting the Privacy and Security of Your Health Information When Using Your Personal Cell Phone or Tablet,” content last reviewed June 29, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/guidance/ cell-phone-hipaa/index.html (accessed March 18, 2023).

Department of Health and Human Services

Weak

Vector: 62%

Pages: 497-499AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The IHS Workforce Parity Act focuses on expanding flexibility for Indian Health Service scholarship and loan repayment recipients, while Project 2025's HHS section centers on Medicare Advantage, Medicaid reform, and market-based payment changes. There is only tangential overlap in the broader goal of improving healthcare access."

Key themes:healthcare accessworkforce flexibilityunderserved populations

— 465 — Department of Health and Human Services 1. Make Medicare Advantage the default enrollment option. 2. Give beneficiaries direct control of how they spend Medicare dollars. 3. Remove burdensome policies that micromanage MA plans. 4. Replace the complex formula-based payment model with a competitive bidding model. 5. Reconfigure the current risk adjustment model. 6. Remove restrictions on key benefits and services, including those related to prescription drugs, hospice care, and medical savings account plans.26 Legacy Medicare Reform. Legislation reforming legacy (non-MA) Medicare should: l Base payments on the health status of the patient or intensity of the service rather than where the patient happens to receive that service. l Replace the bureaucrat-driven fee-for-service system with value- based payments to empower patients to find the care that best serves their needs. l Codify price transparency regulations. l Restructure 340B drug subsidies27 toward beneficiaries rather than hospitals. l Repeal harmful health policies enacted under the Obama and Biden Administrations such as the Medicare Shared Savings Program28 and Inflation Reduction Act.29 Medicare Part D Reform. The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) created a drug price negotiation program in Medicare that replaced the existing private-sector negotiations in Part D with government price controls for prescription drugs. These government price controls will limit access to medications and reduce patient access to new medication. This “negotiation” program should be repealed, and reforms in Part D that will have meaningful impact for seniors should be pursued. Other reforms should include eliminating the coverage gap in Part D, reducing the government share in — 466 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise the catastrophic tier, and requiring manufacturers to bear a larger share. Until the IRA is repealed, an Administration that is required to implement it must do so in a way that is prudent with its authority, minimizing the harmful effects of the law’s policies and avoiding even worse unintended consequences.30 Medicaid. Over the past 45 years, Medicaid and the health safety net have evolved into a cumbersome, complicated, and unaffordable burden on nearly every state. The program is failing some of the most vulnerable patients; is a prime target for waste, fraud, and abuse; and is consuming more of state and federal budgets. The dramatic increase in Medicaid expenditures is due in large part to the ACA (Obamacare), which mandates that states must expand their Medicaid eligibility standards to include all individuals at or below 138 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL), and the public health emergency, which has prohibited states from performing basic eligibility reviews. The overlap of available benefits among the various health agencies has led to a complex, confusing system that is nearly impossible to navigate—even for recipients. Recipients are often faced with a “welfare cliff” of benefit losses as they earn above a certain amount, which is contrary to the fundamental purpose of empowering individuals to achieve economic independence. Benefits increasingly involve nonmedical services such as air conditioning and housing, many of which are already handled by departments other than HHS. Improper payments within Medicaid are higher than those of any other federal program. These payments are evidence of the inappropriateness of Medicaid’s expansion, which, stemming largely from public health emergency maintenance of effort (MOE) requirements and the Affordable Care Act, has crowded out the primary targets of these programs: those who are most in need. True health care reform cannot be accomplished in a bureaucratic silo or only through Medicaid and health safety net programs. Reform of the tax code is also essential to genuine, effective reform of our health care system. All components of the health care system should be part of the reform efforts, and it is imperative that the system be modified to assist states with their current programs. Therefore, the next Administration should: l Reform financing. Allow states to have a more flexible, accountable, predictable, transparent, and efficient financing mechanism to deliver medical services. This system should include a more balanced or blended match rate, block grants, aggregate caps, or per capita caps. Any financial system should be designed to encourage and incentivize innovation and the efficient delivery of health care services. Federal and state financial participation in the Medicaid program should be rational, predictable, and reasonable. It should also incentivize states to save money and improve the quality of health care.

Department of Health and Human Services

Weak

Vector: 60%

Pages: 533-535AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The IHS Workforce Parity Act focuses on increasing flexibility for healthcare providers serving Native American communities through part-time service options, while Project 2025's HHS section emphasizes Medicaid reform, managed care oversight, and conservative health policy priorities with no direct connection to Indian Health Service workforce programs."

Key themes:healthcare workforceaccess to careDepartment of Health and Human Services

— 500 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 32. Owcharenko Schaefer, “Medicaid at 55: Understanding the Design, Trends, and Reforms Needed to Improve the Health Care Safety Net.” 33. Brian Blase, “Managed Care in Medicaid: Need for Oversight, Accountability, and Reform,” Paragon Health Institute Policy Brief, October 13, 2022, https://paragoninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/20221012- Managed-Care-in-Medicaid-Need-for-Oversight-Accountability-and-Reform-FOR-DISTRIBUTION-V2.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 34. Owcharenko Schaefer, “Medicaid at 55: Understanding the Design, Trends, and Reforms Needed to Improve the Health Care Safety Net.” 35. 42 U.S. Code § 1315, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1315 (accessed March 17, 2023). 36. Chad D. Savage and Lee S. Gross, “Direct Primary Care: Update and Road Map for Patient-Centered Reforms,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 3635, June 28, 2021, https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/ files/2021-06/BG3635.pdf. 37. H.R. 133, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, Public Law No. 116-260, 116th Congress, December 27, 2020, Division BB, Title I, https://www.congress.gov/116/plaws/publ260/PLAW-116publ260.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 38. Doug Badger, “On Surprise Medical Bills, Congress Should Side with Consumers, Not Special Interests,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, January 31, 2020, https://www.heritage.org/health-care-reform/ commentary/surprise-medical-bills-congress-should-side-consumers-not-special. 39. Edmund F. Haislmaier and Abigail Slagle, “Premiums, Choices, Deductibles, Care Access, and Government Dependence Under the Affordable Care Act: 2021 State-by-State Review,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 3668, November 2, 2021, https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/files/2021-11/BG3668.pdf. 40. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Transparency in Coverage,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 85, No. 219 (November 12, 2020), pp. 72158–72310, https://www.govinfo.gov/ content/pkg/FR-2020-11-12/pdf/2020-24591.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 41. David N. Bernstein and Robert E. Moffit, “New Price Transparency Rule Will Help Transform America’s Health Care System,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, November 1, 2020, https://www.heritage.org/health-care- reform/commentary/new-price-transparency-rule-will-help-transform-americas-health-care. 42. Sluzala and Haislmaier, “Lessons from COVID-19: How Policymakers Should Reform the Regulation of Clinical Testing.” 43. Ibid. 44. Most recently enacted in H.R. 2471, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022, Public Law No. 117-103, 117th Congress, March 15, 2022, Division H, Title V, §§ 506–507, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ103/ PLAW-117publ103.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 45. President Joseph R. Biden Jr., Executive Order 14079, “Securing Access to Reproductive and Other Healthcare Services,” August 3, 2022, in Federal Register, Vol. 87, No. 154 (August 11, 2022), pp. 49505–49507, https:// www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-08-11/pdf/2022-17420.pdf (accessed March 16, 2023). 46. Planned Parenthood, 2020–2021 Annual Report, p. 27, https://www.plannedparenthood.org/uploads/ filer_public/40/8f/408fc2ad-c8c2-48da-ad87-be5cc257d370/211214-ppfa-annualreport-20-21-c3-digital.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023). 47. Ibid., pp. 30 and 31. Total revenue of $1,714.4 million (p. 30) minus $1,580.7 million in total expenses (p. 31) yields $133,7 million. 48. Ibid., p. 28. 49. Ibid., p. 30. 50. H.R. 372, Protecting Life and Taxpayers Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 17, 2023, https://www. congress.gov/118/bills/hr372/BILLS-118hr372ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 51. 42 U.S. Code § 18023, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/18023 (accessed March 17, 2023). 52. H.R. 3128, Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985, Public Law No. 99-272, 99th Congress, April 7, 1986, Title IX, Subtitle A, Part 1, Subpart B, § 9121, https://www.congress.gov/99/statute/STATUTE-100/ STATUTE-100-Pg82.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 53. H.R. 8070, Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Public Law No. 93-112, 93rd Congress, September 26, 1973, https://www. congress.gov/93/statute/STATUTE-87/STATUTE-87-Pg355.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). — 501 — Department of Health and Human Services 54. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of Civil Rights, and Office of the Secretary, “Special Responsibilities of Medicare Hospitals in Emergency Cases and Discrimination on the Basis of Disability in Critical Health and Human Service Programs or Activities,” draft of Proposed Rule, January 14, 2021, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/infants-nprm.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 55. H.R. 26, Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https:// www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr26/BILLS-118hr26pcs.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 56. H.R. 7, No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr7/BILLS-118hr7ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 57. S. 401, Conscience Protection Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced February 24, 2021, https://www.congress. gov/117/bills/s401/BILLS-117s401is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 58. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and Office of the Secretary, “Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Notice of Tribal Consultation, Federal Register, Vol. 87, No. 149 (August 4, 2022), pp. 47824–47920, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-08-04/pdf/2022-16217.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 59. Ibid., p. 47916. 60. The regulation was not finalized before the end of the Administration. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Services, “Revision of Categorical Eligibility in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP),” Proposed Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 142 (July 24, 2019), pp. 35570–55581, https:// www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/07/24/2019-15670/revision-of-categorical-eligibility-in-the- supplemental-nutrition-assistance-program-snap (accessed March 17, 2023). 61. 45 Code of Federal Regulations § 75.300(c) and (d), https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/ subchapter-A/part-75/subpart-D/subject-group-ECFR911e5e1a30bfbcb/section-75.300 (accessed March 17, 2023). 62. H.R. 1750, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https:// www.congress.gov/117/bills/hr1750/BILLS-117hr1750ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023), and S. 656, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/ s656/BILLS-117s656is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 63. S. 3949, Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2022, Public Law No. 117-348, 117th Congress, January 25, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ348/PLAW-117publ348.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 64. Kelsey Y. Santamaria, “Child Migrants at the Border: The Flores Settlement Agreement and Other Legal Developments,” Congressional Research Service In Focus No. IF11799, April 1, 2021, https://crsreports.congress. gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11799 (accessed March 17, 2023). 65. Report, Building a Happy Home: Marriage Education as a Tool to Strengthen Families, Social Capital Project Report No. 1-22, March 2022, p. 17, https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/3d102525-6f0d-48ed- 92f4-d71edd468ad6/building-a-happy-home.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). The cover of the report reflects that the Social Capital Project is “[a] project of the Joint Economic Committee – Republicans.” 66. See, for example, Alan J. Hawkins, “Are Federally Supported Relationship Education Programs for Lower-Income Individuals and Couples Working? A Review of Evaluation Research,” American Enterprise Institute, September 2019, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 67. H.R. 8404, Respect for Marriage Act, Public Law No. 117-228, 117th Congress, December 13, 2022, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 68. Madison Marino, “Over 1,000 Safety Violations Mar Head Start. Children Deserve Better,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, November 10, 2022, https://www.heritage.org/education/commentary/over-1000-safety- violations-mar-head-start-children-deserve-better. 69. American Hospital Association v. Becerra, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), https://www.supremecourt.gov/ opinions/21pdf/20-1114_09m1.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 70. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, “Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Federal Register, Vol. 88, No. 22 (February 2, 2023), pp. 7236–7281, https://www. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-02-02/pdf/2023-01981.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023).

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Sen. Cortez Masto, Catherine

Combating Illicit Xylazine Act

119/s/545

Western Wildfire Support Act of 2025

119/s/91

Mining Regulatory Clarity Act

119/s/544

Back to All Bills