Korean American Divided Families National Registry Act

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/s/555

Last Updated: September 4, 2025

Korean American Divided Families National Registry Act

S. 555, 119th Congress.

The sponsor

Sen. Kaine, Tim [D-VA]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$138,300 raised

30 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

40% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Justice" section, p. 608-610 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 51.

April 27, 2025

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

**Bill Analysis: S 555 - Korean American Divided Families National Registry Act**

As a visionary entrepreneur and strategic thinker, I'll dissect this bill through the lens of its potential impact on my business empire and the global landscape.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective of this bill is to establish a national registry for Korean American families divided by the Korean War Armistice Agreement. The registry aims to facilitate future reunions between these families and their relatives in North Korea.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**

1. **National Registry:** The Secretary of State will create a private, internal database to collect information about Korean American families seeking reunification with their North Korean relatives. 2. **Disclosure of Information:** The Secretary may share registry information with individuals, institutions, or the public, provided that consent is obtained from affected parties and confidentiality agreements are in place. 3. **Actions to Facilitate Dialogue:** The bill encourages the Secretary of State to engage in direct dialogue with North Korea to facilitate reunions and report on progress.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**

1. **Korean American Families:** The primary beneficiaries of this bill, who will have access to a registry that may aid in reuniting them with their North Korean relatives. 2. **North Korean Government:** The bill's success relies on the cooperation of the North Korean government, which may be incentivized by potential diplomatic benefits. 3. **U.S. Government Agencies:** The State Department and other agencies will be involved in implementing and maintaining the registry.

**Potential Impact & Implications:**

From a business perspective, this bill has minimal direct impact on my empire. However, I'll highlight some broader implications:

1. **Diplomatic Opportunities:** Successful implementation of this bill could lead to increased diplomatic engagement between the U.S. and North Korea, potentially creating new avenues for trade and cooperation. 2. **Humanitarian Benefits:** The registry may bring emotional closure and reunification opportunities for affected families, which could have positive social and cultural implications. 3. **Regulatory Environment:** This bill's focus on information sharing and confidentiality agreements may set a precedent for future legislation related to data protection and international cooperation.

In conclusion, while this bill has limited direct impact on my business interests, it presents an opportunity to observe the evolution of U.S.-North Korea relations and potential implications for global diplomacy and trade. As a visionary entrepreneur, I'll continue to monitor developments and adjust my strategies accordingly.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics, a bill is a proposed law that must go through several stages before becoming an actual law.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The Korean American Divided Families National Registry Act (S. 555) aims to establish a national registry of Korean American families who were divided during the Korean War and wish to be reunited with their family members in North Korea. The bill's primary objective is to facilitate future reunions, including in-person and video reunions.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The bill requires the Secretary of State to:

1. Identify Korean American families who want to be reunited with their family members in North Korea. 2. Establish a private, internal national registry of these families' names and relevant information. 3. Take actions to facilitate dialogue between the United States and North Korea on holding future reunions.

The bill also authorizes $1 million for the Secretary of State to carry out these provisions.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

The affected parties include:

* Korean American families who were divided during the Korean War * The Secretary of State and relevant departments (e.g., Special Envoy on North Korean Human Rights Issues, Assistant Secretary of State for Consular Affairs) * The Government of the Republic of Korea (South Korea) * Academic institutions and other members of the public who may be involved in sharing information

**Potential Impact & Implications**

If passed, this bill could:

* Provide a centralized repository of information on Korean American families divided during the Korean War * Facilitate future reunions between these families and their loved ones in North Korea * Enhance dialogue between the United States and North Korea on human rights issues

However, as I'm sure you recall from our 8th grade civics class, this bill still needs to go through several stages before becoming a law. It must be passed by both the Senate and House of Representatives, then signed into law by the President.

Now, if only more adults had paid attention in their middle school social studies classes...

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

My fellow truth-seekers, gather 'round and listen closely, for I have uncovered the hidden agenda behind S 555, the Korean American Divided Families National Registry Act. On the surface, this bill appears to be a benevolent effort to reunite Korean American families with their loved ones in North Korea. But, my friends, do not be deceived.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The stated purpose of this bill is to establish a national registry of Korean American divided families and facilitate future reunions between these families and their family members in North Korea. However, I believe the true intention is to create a database that can be used for more sinister purposes, such as surveillance and control.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill authorizes the Secretary of State to establish a national registry of Korean American divided families, which will include sensitive information about these individuals. The Secretary may also enter into agreements with third parties to share this information, raising concerns about data protection and privacy. Furthermore, the bill requires the Secretary to report on the status of the registry and the progress of reunions, which could be used as a tool for propaganda or manipulation.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The primary stakeholders are Korean American families who have been divided by the Korean War Armistice Agreement. However, I believe that this bill also affects the broader American public, as it sets a precedent for the government to collect and store sensitive information about its citizens. Additionally, the bill's provisions may impact North Korea's human rights record and the country's willingness to cooperate with the United States.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential implications of this bill are far-reaching and alarming. By creating a national registry of Korean American divided families, the government is essentially building a database that can be used for surveillance and control. This raises concerns about data protection, privacy, and the potential for abuse of power. Furthermore, the bill's provisions may be used to manipulate public opinion or justify future military interventions in North Korea.

In conclusion, my fellow truth-seekers, S 555 is not what it seems. Behind its benevolent facade lies a sinister agenda that threatens our civil liberties and national security. We must remain vigilant and demand transparency from our government, lest we fall prey to their machinations.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Outraged tone) Folks, we've got another bill on our hands that's just begging for scrutiny. The Korean American Divided Families National Registry Act - sounds innocent enough, right? Wrong! This is a classic case of the elites in Washington trying to sneak one past us.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to establish a national registry of Korean American families who were divided during the Korean War. Sounds like a noble cause, but let's not be fooled. The real objective here is to create another bureaucratic database that will inevitably be used to track and control our citizens.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill authorizes the Secretary of State to establish this registry, which will collect personal information on Korean American families. But don't worry, they'll only share it with "appropriate" parties... like academic institutions and other members of the public. (Sarcasm alert!) Oh, and there's a $1 million price tag attached to this little endeavor.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Korean American families who were divided during the war will be affected by this bill. But let's not forget about the real stakeholders here - the bureaucrats in Washington who get to expand their power and control over our lives.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill has all sorts of implications for freedom-loving Americans like us. Think about it - a national registry is just a fancy way of saying "database." And what happens when governments start collecting data on their citizens? (Dramatic pause) You guessed it - they use it to control and manipulate them! This is just another step towards a surveillance state, folks.

Now, I know some of you might be thinking, "But wait, isn't this bill trying to help Korean American families?" And to that, I say... (wink) don't be naive. The elites in Washington aren't interested in helping anyone but themselves. This is just another power grab, plain and simple.

So, what can we do about it? We need to stay vigilant, folks. We need to keep an eye on these bureaucrats and make sure they're not sneaking anything past us. (Smirk) And if you're a Korean American family affected by this bill... well, just remember - the government is always watching.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another exercise in legislative theater, courtesy of our esteemed Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Korean American Divided Families National Registry Act (S 555) claims to establish a national registry for Korean American families divided by the Korean War Armistice Agreement. The bill's sponsors, including Senators Kaine and Cruz, want us to believe that this registry will facilitate future reunions between these families and their loved ones in North Korea.

**Diagnosis:** This is a classic case of "Feel-Good Legislation Syndrome" (FGLS). Symptoms include: vague objectives, lack of concrete actions, and an overemphasis on emotional appeal. The real purpose of this bill? To make politicians look compassionate while doing nothing meaningful to address the actual issues.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill creates a national registry for Korean American families, which will be maintained by the Secretary of State. It also authorizes $1 million in appropriations for this endeavor. Oh, and there's some vague language about facilitating dialogue between the US and North Korea. Because, you know, that's worked so well in the past.

**Changes to existing law:** None significant. This bill is more of a symbolic gesture than an actual attempt to address the complex issues surrounding Korean American divided families.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Korean American families, of course, are the supposed beneficiaries of this bill. However, given the lack of concrete actions and resources, it's unlikely they'll see any real benefits. The true stakeholders? Politicians looking for a photo op and lobbyists seeking to curry favor with Korean American interest groups.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill will have zero meaningful impact on the lives of Korean American families or US-North Korea relations. It might, however, provide some fleeting PR benefits for its sponsors. In the grand tradition of FGLS, this legislation will likely be used as a talking point during election cycles, only to be forgotten once the cameras stop rolling.

**Prognosis:** This bill is DOA (Dead on Arrival). Even if it passes, it won't address the underlying issues driving family divisions or improve US-North Korea relations. It's just another example of Congress's addiction to symbolic legislation and its inability to tackle real problems.

Now, let's get back to our regularly scheduled programming: watching politicians pretend to care about actual issues while doing nothing meaningful to address them.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**Bill Summary: Korean American Divided Families National Registry Act (S 555)**

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill aims to establish a national registry of Korean American families who were divided during the Korean War and wish to be reunited with their family members in North Korea. The registry will facilitate future reunions, including in-person and video meetings, and provide a repository of information about these families.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**

1. The Secretary of State is directed to establish a national registry of Korean American divided families. 2. The registry will collect names and relevant information of Korean American families who wish to be reunited with their family members in North Korea. 3. The Secretary of State may enter into agreements with individuals, institutions, or organizations to share information from the registry, subject to consent and confidentiality requirements. 4. The bill authorizes $1 million for the establishment and maintenance of the registry.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**

1. Korean American families who were divided during the Korean War and wish to be reunited with their family members in North Korea. 2. The Secretary of State, responsible for establishing and maintaining the national registry. 3. The Government of the Republic of Korea, which will be consulted on matters related to reunions and dialogue between the United States and North Korea.

**Potential Impact & Implications:**

1. Facilitates family reunions: The bill provides a framework for Korean American families to reconnect with their loved ones in North Korea. 2. Promotes human rights: By establishing a registry, the bill acknowledges the human rights of Korean Americans who were separated from their families during the war. 3. Enhances US-North Korea dialogue: The bill encourages the Secretary of State to include progress on family reunions in direct dialogue with North Korea. 4. Raises awareness: The registry will provide a repository of information about Korean American divided families, raising awareness about this issue and promoting efforts to address it.

Overall, the Korean American Divided Families National Registry Act aims to bring closure and reunification to Korean American families who were separated during the Korean War, while also promoting human rights and facilitating dialogue between the United States and North Korea.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (neutral personality)

Let's break down this bill, bro.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

This bill, the Korean American Divided Families National Registry Act (S 555), is all about helpin' out Korean American families who got separated from their loved ones in North Korea after the Korean War. The main goal is to create a national registry of these families and facilitate future reunions.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The bill requires the Secretary of State to:

1. Identify Korean American families who wanna be reunited with their family members in North Korea. 2. Create a private, internal national registry of these families' names and other relevant info. 3. Take actions to facilitate dialogue between the US and North Korea about holdin' future reunions.

The bill also authorizes $1 million for the Secretary of State to carry out these tasks.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

This bill affects:

* Korean American families who were separated from their loved ones in North Korea. * The US government, particularly the Department of State and the Special Envoy on North Korean Human Rights Issues. * The Government of the Republic of Korea (South Korea). * Academic institutions and other members of the public who might be involved in sharing information about these families.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

This bill has some gnarly implications, bro:

* It could help bring closure to Korean American families who've been separated for decades. * It might facilitate more reunions between Korean American families and their loved ones in North Korea. * The national registry could provide a valuable resource for researchers and policymakers studyin' the impact of the Korean War on families.

However, there are also some potential challenges:

* The bill relies on cooperation from North Korea, which can be unpredictable, man. * There might be concerns about data privacy and security when it comes to sharin' information about these families.

Overall, this bill is a solid step towards helpin' Korean American families reconnect with their loved ones in North Korea. It's all about bringin' people together, bro!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**Bill Analysis: S 555 - Korean American Divided Families National Registry Act**

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective of this bill is to establish a national registry of Korean American families who were divided during the Korean War and wish to be reunited with their family members in North Korea. The registry aims to facilitate future reunions, including in-person and video reunions, and provide a repository of information about these families.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**

1. **Establishment of National Registry:** The Secretary of State is directed to establish a private, internal national registry of Korean American families who wish to be reunited with their family members in North Korea. 2. **Disclosure of Information:** The Secretary of State may enter into agreements with individuals, institutions, or other parties to share information collected and housed in the database, subject to certain conditions and consent requirements. 3. **Actions to Facilitate Dialogue:** The Secretary of State is required to take actions to ensure that any direct dialogue between the United States and North Korea includes progress towards holding future reunions for Korean American families.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**

1. **Korean American Families:** The primary beneficiaries of this bill are Korean American families who were divided during the Korean War and wish to be reunited with their family members in North Korea. 2. **North Korean Government:** The bill's provisions may impact the North Korean government's policies and actions regarding reunions and emigration of family members of Korean American families. 3. **U.S. Department of State:** The Secretary of State is responsible for establishing and maintaining the national registry, as well as facilitating dialogue between the United States and North Korea.

**Potential Impact & Implications:**

1. **Humanitarian Benefits:** The bill may bring hope and relief to Korean American families who have been separated for decades, providing a potential pathway for reunions and closure. 2. **Diplomatic Implications:** The bill's provisions may influence the dynamics of U.S.-North Korea relations, potentially creating opportunities for increased cooperation and dialogue on humanitarian issues. 3. **Privacy Concerns:** The disclosure of information from the national registry raises concerns about the privacy and security of Korean American families' personal data.

**Monied Interest Analysis:** While there are no apparent direct financial interests or PACs backing this bill, it is worth noting that the Korean-American community has been actively advocating for legislation to address the issue of divided families. The National Korean American Service & Education Consortium (NAKASEC) and other organizations have likely played a role in promoting this bill.

**Committee Capture:** The Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, which reported this bill, may be considered "captured" by humanitarian and human rights interests, as well as those advocating for improved U.S.-North Korea relations. However, there is no apparent evidence of industry or special interest group influence in this legislation.

**Follow-the-Money Trail:** There are

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Sen. Kaine, Tim [D-VA]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$138,300

19 donors

PACs

Organizations

$9,800

Committees

Individuals

$128,500

No PAC contributions found

THE CHICKASAW NATION

3 transactions

$4,300

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

3 transactions

$2,000

SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

1 transaction

$1,000

CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA

1 transaction

$1,000

CHEROKEE NATION

1 transaction

$1,000

STONEHALL FARM

1 transaction

$500

No committee contributions found

BROWN, MARY K.

2 transactions

$15,100

THOMAS, TORI WINKLER

2 transactions

$13,200

BERG, MILDRED

2 transactions

$13,200

MILLER, CAROLE

2 transactions

$13,200

LAUDER, LEONARD A.

2 transactions

$12,000

MARQUEZ, DARIO O. JR

2 transactions

$11,600

SEMANS, TRUMAN T.

2 transactions

$10,000

BROWN, SCOTT S.

1 transaction

$9,200

SHUMADINE, CONRAD

1 transaction

$6,700

COLLEY, MARK D.

1 transaction

$6,600

CRAIG, FRANCES B.

1 transaction

$6,200

CHAI, CHUCKRA

1 transaction

$6,200

SCRIPPS, WENDY

1 transaction

$5,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 5 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX]

ID: C001098

Top Contributors

WINRED

PACARLINGTON, VA

$1,167,293

Nov 1, 2024

WINRED

PACARLINGTON, VA

$330,599

Nov 5, 2024

FASKEN MANAGEMENT

OrganizationMIDLAND, TX

$10,000

May 24, 2023

REPUBLICAN PARTY OF HARRISON COUNTY

OrganizationMARSHALL, TX

$4,000

Oct 16, 2024

FOLAD ENTERPRISES LLC

OrganizationPINELLAS PARK, FL

$2,000

May 20, 2024

BALCH & BINGHAM LLP

OrganizationBIRMINGHAM, AL

$1,000

May 20, 2024

PARTNERS HOTEL GROUP LLC

OrganizationMURPHY, TX

$1,000

Jun 7, 2023

KHAT INVESTMENS LLC

OrganizationMIDLAND, TX

$1,000

Jun 30, 2023

PJB INVESTMENT ADVISORS LLC

OrganizationADDISON, TX

$800

May 1, 2024

GRANT MORELAND LP LLC

OrganizationGILMER, TX

$750

Sep 19, 2024

Sen. Coons, Christopher A. [D-DE]

ID: C001088

Top Contributors

CHEROKEE NATION

OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK

$3,300

Dec 27, 2023

CHEROKEE NATION

OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK

$1,700

Dec 27, 2023

CHEN, YU

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualMIAMI, FL

$3,300

Dec 17, 2024

MIRZAIE, REZA

RUSS AUGUST & KABAT LLP • ATTORNEY

IndividualPACIFIC PALISADES, CA

$3,300

Oct 7, 2024

CHEN, YU

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualMIAMI, FL

$3,300

Dec 17, 2024

WASSERMAN, CASEY

WASSERMAN • CEO

IndividualLOS ANGELES, CA

$3,300

Nov 5, 2024

ZHAO, PENG

CITADEL SECURITIES • CEO

IndividualMIAMI, FL

$3,300

Dec 17, 2024

WASSERMAN, CASEY

WASSERMAN • CEO

IndividualLOS ANGELES, CA

$3,300

Nov 5, 2024

ZHAO, PENG

CITADEL SECURITIES • CEO

IndividualMIAMI, FL

$3,300

Dec 17, 2024

MIRZAIE, REZA

RUSS AUGUST & KABAT LLP • ATTORNEY

IndividualPACIFIC PALISADES, CA

$3,300

Oct 7, 2024

Sen. Kelly, Mark [D-AZ]

ID: K000377

Top Contributors

PASCUA YAQUI TRIBE

OrganizationTUCSON, AZ

$3,300

Oct 23, 2023

THE CHICKASAW NATION

OrganizationADA, OK

$2,500

May 23, 2024

GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY

OrganizationSACATON, AZ

$1,000

Jun 15, 2023

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$1,000

Aug 12, 2024

CORMIER, STEPHEN

IndividualMANSFIELD, LA

$6,000

Dec 31, 2023

LEWIS, PAUL

NOT EMPLOYED • RETIRED

IndividualKINGMAN, AZ

$5,000

Oct 23, 2024

LEWIS, PAUL

IndividualKINGMAN, AZ

$5,000

Dec 6, 2024

BASS, JOSEPH P

NOT EMPLOYED • RETIRED

IndividualPORTLAND, OR

$5,000

Mar 29, 2024

PEROT, MARGOT B

NOT EMPLOYED • RETIRED

IndividualDALLAS, TX

$5,000

Apr 8, 2024

MILLER, JUDITH

IndividualINDIANAPOLIS, IN

$5,000

Sep 11, 2024

Sen. Ricketts, Pete [R-NE]

ID: R000618

Top Contributors

SPIKE OCOTILLO LLC

OrganizationCHANDLER, AZ

$2,500

Mar 4, 2024

HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP

OrganizationRICHMOND, VA

$1,000

Mar 28, 2024

KING & SPALDING LLP

OrganizationATLANTA, GA

$1,000

Mar 29, 2024

GREENBERG TRAURIG

OrganizationALBANY, NY

$1,000

Apr 23, 2024

H.A. TRUE, III

OrganizationCASPER, WY

$1,000

Aug 22, 2024

DELTA AIRLINES

OrganizationATLANTA, GA

$234

Apr 17, 2023

VANDERSLOOT, BELINDA

SELF • HOMEMAKER

IndividualIDAHO FALLS, ID

$6,600

Mar 4, 2024

VANDERSLOOT, FRANK

MELALEUCA • OWNER

IndividualIDAHO FALLS, ID

$6,600

Mar 4, 2024

MANDELBLATT, DANIELLE

RETIRED

IndividualASPEN, CO

$6,600

Jun 7, 2024

MANDELBLATT, ERIC

SOROBAN CAPITAL PARTNERS LP • MANAGING PARTNER

IndividualASPEN, CO

$6,600

Jun 7, 2024

Sen. Ossoff, Jon [D-GA]

ID: O000174

Top Contributors

THOMAS, TORI

IndividualMCLEAN, VA

$9,100

Jun 30, 2024

MCCLURE, RODERICK

RODFATHER PRODUCTIONS • BUSINESS OWNER

IndividualALPHARETTA, GA

$6,600

Nov 25, 2024

MCCLURE, RODERICK

IndividualALPHARETTA, GA

$6,600

Dec 23, 2024

HOLLANDER, ELLEN

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualROSWELL, GA

$5,000

Oct 6, 2024

HOLLANDER, ELLEN

IndividualROSWELL, GA

$5,000

Oct 14, 2024

MILLER, KRISTIE

SELF EMPLOYED • WRITER

IndividualWASHINGTON, DC

$3,300

Jun 5, 2024

RECHNITZ, JOAN

NOT EMPLOYED • RETIRED

IndividualRED BANK, NJ

$3,300

Apr 22, 2024

HOPPER, HEIDI

NOT EMPLOYED • RETIRED

IndividualMENLO PARK, CA

$3,300

May 3, 2024

BRASCH, JOHN

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualLINCOLN, NE

$3,300

Apr 16, 2024

ARNOLD, JOHN

ARNOLD VENTURES • CO-FOUNDER

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$3,300

Apr 2, 2024

Donor Network - Sen. Kaine, Tim [D-VA]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 71 nodes and 45 connections (80 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $1,688,092

Top Donors - Sen. Kaine, Tim [D-VA]

Showing top 19 donors by contribution amount

6 Orgs13 Individuals

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Justice

Minimal

Vector: 58%

Pages: 608-610AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on establishing a registry for Korean American divided families to facilitate reunions with North Korea, which is unrelated to the Project 2025 Department of Justice section's emphasis on FBI accountability, domestic terrorism concerns, and law enforcement oversight. There is no thematic or policy overlap between the two."

— 575 — Department of Justice 22. Editorial Board, “About Those Domestic-Terrorist Parents,” The Wall Street Journal, October 26, 2021, https://www. wsj.com/articles/about-those-domestic-terrorists-national-school-boards-association-merrick-garland-memo- fbi-11635285900 (accessed February 3, 2023); John Malcom, “Are Parents Being Tagged as ‘Domestic Terrorists’ by the FBI? Justice Department Needs to Show Its Cards,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, November 18, 2021, https://www.heritage.org/crime-and-justice/commentary/are-parents-being-tagged-domestic-terrorists-the- fbi-justice (accessed February 3, 2023); Victor Nava, “FBI Treated Twitter as a ‘Subsidiary,’ Flagged Tweets and Accounts for ‘Misinformation,’” New York Post, updated December 16, 2022, https://nypost.com/2022/12/16/fbi- treated-twitter-as-subsidiary-flagged-tweets-for-misinformation/ (accessed February 3, 2023). 23. Mary Margaret Olohan, “DOJ’s Kristen Clarke: A Pro-Abortion Activist Enforcing the Law Against Pro-Lifers,” The Daily Signal, October 26, 2022, https://www.dailysignal.com/2022/10/26/dojs-kristen-clarke-pro- abortion-activist-enforcing-law-pro-lifers/ ; Josh Gerstein, “DOJ Official Pressed on Targeting of Supreme Court Justices,” Politico, July 28, 2022, https://www.politico.com/news/2022/07/28/doj-official-pressed-on- targeting-of-supreme-court-justices-00048506 (accessed February 3, 2023). 24. Solomon, “FBI Email Chain May Provide Most Damning Evidence of FISA Abuses Yet”; Post Editorial Board, “The FBI Knew RussiaGate Was a Lie—But Hid That Truth”; O’Neill, “FBI Pressured Twitter, Sent Trove of Docs Hours Before Post Broke Hunter Laptop Story.” 25. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, “History: The Nation Calls, 1908–1923,” https:// www.fbi.gov/history/brief-history/the-nation-calls (accessed February 3, 2023). 26. Press release, “FBI and Law Enforcement Partners Arrest Nearly 6,000 Violent Criminals This Summer,” U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, September 13, 2022, https://www.fbi.gov/news/ press-releases/press-releases/fbi-and-law-enforcement-partners-arrest-nearly-6000-violent-criminals-this- summer (accessed February 3, 2023). 27. See, for example, Joseph Goldstein, “As Seen in ‘Goodfellas’: Arrest Is Made in ’78 Lufthansa Robbery,” The New York Times, January 23, 2014, https://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/24/nyregion/arrests-in-cold-case- investigation-including-78-lufthansa-heist.html (accessed February 3, 2023). 28. Danielle Wallace, “FBI Nationwide Operation Locates 121 Actively Missing Kids, Child Sex Trafficking Victims,” Fox News, August 15, 2022, https://www.foxnews.com/us/fbi-nationwide-operation-locates-actively-missing- kids-child-sex-trafficking-victims (accessed February 3, 2023). 29. Adam Shaw, “FBI Stepped in After Suspected Chinese Spy Got Close to Swalwell, Other Politicians, Report Finds,” Fox News, December 8, 2020, https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fbi-chinese-spy-swalwell-other- politicians (accessed February 3, 2023). 30. The precise scope and contours of this review warrant special consideration. A review of all ongoing drug trafficking investigations or specific violent crime investigations may not warrant the department’s attention in the same way as high-profile, politically sensitive investigations likely will. Nevertheless, the goal should be as comprehensive a review as possible. 31. 28 U.S. Code § 531, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/531 (accessed February 3, 2023). Emphasis added. 32. The same could be said to apply to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms and potentially to the U.S. Marshals Service, although the USMS’s mission protecting the federal courts could present compelling reasons why the department should maintain it as a direct report to the Deputy Attorney General. 33. See, for example, Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers No. 1, October 27, 1787, https://founders.archives. gov/documents/Hamilton/01-04-02-0152 (accessed February 3, 2023). 34. An argument could also be made that the upper echelons of the FBI’s leadership should physically relocate back to the Robert F. Kennedy building to ensure proper accountability and to emphasize organizational reality: The FBI is a component of the department, not its equal, as outlined above. 35. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of the Inspector General, Audit of the Roles and Responsibilities of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Office of the General Counsel in National Security Matters, Report No. 22-116, September 2022, https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/22-116.pdf (accessed February 3, 2023). 36. S. 2212, Crime Control Act of 1976, Public Law No. 94-503, October 15, 1976, § 203, 90 Stat. 2427 (codified as amended at 28 U.S. Code § 532), https://www.congress.gov/94/statute/STATUTE-90/STATUTE-90-Pg2407. pdf (accessed February 3, 2023). 37. See “Enhancing Federal Focus and Resources in Jurisdictions with Rule-of-Law Deficiencies,” infra. — 576 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 38. Garland Memorandum, October 4, 2021; press release, “America First Legal Seeks Two Federal Investigations on Attorney General Merrick Garland’s Infamous Oct. 4th Memo Siccing the FBI on Concerned Parents,” America First Legal Foundation, March 14, 2022, https://aflegal.org/america-first-legal-seeks-two-federal- investigations-on-attorney-general-merrick-garlands-infamous-oct-4th-memo-siccing-the-fbi-on-concerned- parents/ (accessed February 3, 2023). 39. Luke Rosiak, “In Aftermath of Enemies List, School Committee Pledges to ‘Silence the Opposition,’” Daily Wire, March 27, 2021, https://www.dailywire.com/news/after-enemies-list-school-body-pledges-to-silence-the- opposition (accessed February 3, 2023). 40. The language of the Equal Protection Clause “reflects that ‘achieving equal protection against lawbreakers was at the core of the Clause’s objectives.’” Lefebure v. D’Aquilla, 15 F.4th 650, 669 (5th Cir. 2021) (Graves, J. dissenting) (quoting Lawrence Rosenthal, “Policing and Equal Protection,” Yale Law & Policy Review, Vol. 21, No. 53 (2003), p. 70) cert. denied, 212 L. Ed. 2d 791, 142 S. Ct. 2732 (2022)), https://casetext.com/case/ lefebure-v-daquilla-2 (accessed February 3, 2023). 41. See, for example, Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler’s actions in 2020 calling on federal officials—executing their mission to protect federal property and officials—to leave the city, saying, “They’re not wanted here” despite the fact that local reports found that “[o]ut of more than a thousand arrests reported by the Portland Police Bureau and other local law enforcement since late May 2020, only about 8.4% of the cases are still open” and that the “rest have been dismissed or listed as no complaint, which means authorities are not currently pursuing charges.” BBC News, “Portland Protests: Mayor Demands Federal Officers Leave City,” July 20, 2020, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53466718 (accessed February 3, 2023), and Hannah Lambert, “91% of Portland Protest Arrests Not Being Prosecuted,” Portland Tribune, January 5, 2021, https://archive.ph/ OSDbz (accessed February 3,2023). 42. Figure 4, “Trend in Average Guideline Minimum and Average Sentence Imposed for Armed Career Criminals Fiscal Years 2010–2019,” in U.S. Sentencing Commission, Federal Armed Career Criminals: Prevalence, Patterns, and Pathways, March 2021, p. 26, https://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/research-and-publications/ research-publications/2021/20210303_ACCA-Report.pdf (accessed February 3, 2023). 43. 18 U.S. Code § 924(e), https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/924 (accessed February 3, 2023). 44. S. 1586, Restoring the Armed Career Criminal Act, 117th Congress, introduced May 12, 2021, https://www. congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/1586 (accessed February 6, 2023). 45. This could require seeking the Supreme Court to overrule Kennedy v. Louisiana, 554 U.S. 407 (2008), in applicable cases, but the department should place a priority on doing so. 46. 21 U.S. Code § 801 et seq., https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/chapter-13/subchapter-I/part-A (accessed February 3, 2023). 47. 18 U.S. Code §§ 1961–1968, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-I/chapter-96 (accessed February 3, 2023). 48. For more on this topic generally, see “Ensuring Enforcement and Administration of Our Immigration Laws,” infra. 49. See Paul J. Larkin, “Twenty-First Century Illicit Drugs and Their Discontents: The Scourge of Illicit Fentanyl,” Heritage Foundation Legal Memorandum No. 313, November 1, 2022), https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/ files/2022-11/LM313.pdf. 50. Jessica Rendall, “100,000 People Died from Drug Overdoses in the US in One Year, a Record,” CNET, November 18, 2021, https://www.cnet.com/health/medical/100000-people-died-from-drug-overdoses-in- the-us-in-one-year-a-record/ (accessed February 3, 2023). 51. U.S. Department of Justice, National Security Division, “Information About the Department of Justice’s China Initiative and a Compilation of China-Related Prosecutions Since 2018,” last updated November 19, 2021, https://www.justice.gov/archives/nsd/information-about-department-justice-s-china-initiative-and- compilation-china-related (accessed February 3, 2023). 52. Ronn Blitzer and Jake Gibson, “Biden DOJ Ending National Security Initiative Aimed at Countering China amid Complaints About Bias,” Fox News, February 23, 2022, https://www.foxnews.com/politics/doj-ending-china- initiative-national-security-program-bias (accessed February 3, 2023). 53. National Security Strategy, The White House, October 2022, p. 23, https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/ uploads/2022/10/Biden-Harris-Administrations-National-Security-Strategy-10.2022.pdf (accessed February 3, 2023). See also ibid., p. 8.

Department of Health and Human Services

Minimal

Vector: 57%

Pages: 512-514AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on establishing a registry for Korean American families divided during the Korean War to facilitate reunions, which is unrelated to the Project 2025 HHS policies concerning child support, marriage promotion, and healthy relationship education."

— 479 — Department of Health and Human Services dads, and now as “disconnected” dads who do not commit to the mother and child. Child support in the United States should strengthen marriage as the norm, restore broken homes, and encourage unmarried couples to commit to marriage. Child Support Tax Credit. National or state guidelines and tax law should be updated to ensure that nonresident parents with child support orders can receive a nondependent, child support tax credit. Single filers of up to $41,756 and married or joint filers of up to $47,646 would be eligible for a child support tax credit similar to the current earned income tax credit. Filers could receive a maximum of $538 in annual returns for one child and a maximum of $3,584 in annual returns for two or more children (based on a credit rate of 34 percent). A child support tax credit would use the low-income, nonresident parents’ own earned income and history of employment to assist them further in the task of caring for their children. The key to this policy is that it empowers fathers with their own resources and money rather than creating another government assistance program (or a fully refundable credit) devoid of the father’s own monetary efforts. This way, the non- resident father’s role as financial provider and relational figure is affirmed, and much-needed financial resources are given to the children. Visitation. Visitation is key to revitalizing child support and increasing pay- ment frequency. The most effective way to lower a nonresident parent’s monthly child support order is to spend more court-accounted-for time with the child. For example, Texas combined its child support court with its visitation court to ensure that resident and nonresident parents received state-mandated financial support orders and enforceable visitation orders. Child Support Payment and Interactive Smartphone Application. Each state should be induced to implement a high-tech, easy-to-use application to cen- tralize child support payments. As with Venmo or Cash App, nonresident parents would link their bank accounts and provide one-click monthly payments (or con- tribute incrementally throughout the month while tracking how much is due). Additionally, the nonresident parents could track “informal” gifts from money, groceries, clothes, sports gear, and more through the app. This would address one of the main issues within current child support pay- ment systems: nonresident parents claim that they are spending much of their own money to provide for children outside of their monthly payments and resident parents’ claim that they spend little and neglect their official child support orders. Currently, only the latter claim can be tracked reliably. This process would enable nonresident parents to track the amount of informal support they provide and the reason for it while ensuring that the resident parent acknowledges and accepts the contribution. Healthy Marriage and Relationship Education (HMRE) Program. The HMRE program is part of the ACF Office of Family Assistance. The following pol- icies should be implemented. — 480 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l Utilize HMRE funding or grants to provide state-level high school education resources and curriculum on healthy marriages, sexual risk avoidance, and healthy relationships. Early interventions and prevention are much more cost-effective than are efforts to reach people already in broken relationships. l Allow child welfare funding to be used for marriage and relationship education. Congress should adopt the following recommendation from a report issued by members of Congress’s Joint Economic Committee: Children are far more likely to experience abuse when they are raised outside of their married-parent family. Title II of the Child Abuse Preven- tion and Treatment Act provides grants to communities for the purpose of preventing child abuse and neglect, and one of the stated purposes for which the grants can be used is for efforts to increase family stability. However, Congress could change the law to make it clear that Title II funding can be used for healthy marriage and relationship education. Funding provided under Title IV-B of the Social Security Act—which provides grants to states for foster care and adoption services—can also be used for promoting healthy marriage. States should consider using some of their Title IV-B funding for providing healthy marriage and relationship education for families at risk of having their children placed in foster care.65 l Provide educational information on healthy marriage and relationships at Title X family planning clinics. HHS should require clinics it funds under Title X (family planning) to provide information to customers about the importance of marriage to family and personal well-being and refer them to available federal, state, and nonprofit marriage resources. l Ensure proper assessments with enough time to assess HMRE programs. Although some widely available assessments of HMRE programs report poor outcomes, many of these assessments either utilized a poor methodology or tried to measure program success prematurely. Recent assessments have shown increasing effectiveness and positive community- level marital outcomes.66 The HMRE program should receive a fair and realistic assessment. Additionally, the positive role of faith-based programs should be protected

Department of Health and Human Services

Minimal

Vector: 56%

Pages: 512-514AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on reuniting Korean American families divided by the Korean War through a national registry, while the Project 2025 policy addresses child support reform, father engagement, and healthy marriage initiatives within the Department of Health and Human Services. There is no thematic or policy overlap between the two."

Department of Health and Human Services

Minimal

Vector: 55%

Pages: 533-535AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on establishing a registry for Korean American divided families to facilitate reunions with North Korea, which is unrelated to the Department of Health and Human Services policies in Project 2025 that center on healthcare regulations, civil rights in health programs, abortion policy, and related social services. There is no thematic or policy overlap between the bill's foreign policy/humanitarian objective and the HHS-focused Project 2025 provisions."

— 501 — Department of Health and Human Services 54. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of Civil Rights, and Office of the Secretary, “Special Responsibilities of Medicare Hospitals in Emergency Cases and Discrimination on the Basis of Disability in Critical Health and Human Service Programs or Activities,” draft of Proposed Rule, January 14, 2021, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/infants-nprm.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 55. H.R. 26, Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https:// www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr26/BILLS-118hr26pcs.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 56. H.R. 7, No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr7/BILLS-118hr7ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 57. S. 401, Conscience Protection Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced February 24, 2021, https://www.congress. gov/117/bills/s401/BILLS-117s401is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 58. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and Office of the Secretary, “Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Notice of Tribal Consultation, Federal Register, Vol. 87, No. 149 (August 4, 2022), pp. 47824–47920, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-08-04/pdf/2022-16217.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 59. Ibid., p. 47916. 60. The regulation was not finalized before the end of the Administration. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Services, “Revision of Categorical Eligibility in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP),” Proposed Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 142 (July 24, 2019), pp. 35570–55581, https:// www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/07/24/2019-15670/revision-of-categorical-eligibility-in-the- supplemental-nutrition-assistance-program-snap (accessed March 17, 2023). 61. 45 Code of Federal Regulations § 75.300(c) and (d), https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/ subchapter-A/part-75/subpart-D/subject-group-ECFR911e5e1a30bfbcb/section-75.300 (accessed March 17, 2023). 62. H.R. 1750, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https:// www.congress.gov/117/bills/hr1750/BILLS-117hr1750ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023), and S. 656, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/ s656/BILLS-117s656is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 63. S. 3949, Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2022, Public Law No. 117-348, 117th Congress, January 25, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ348/PLAW-117publ348.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 64. Kelsey Y. Santamaria, “Child Migrants at the Border: The Flores Settlement Agreement and Other Legal Developments,” Congressional Research Service In Focus No. IF11799, April 1, 2021, https://crsreports.congress. gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11799 (accessed March 17, 2023). 65. Report, Building a Happy Home: Marriage Education as a Tool to Strengthen Families, Social Capital Project Report No. 1-22, March 2022, p. 17, https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/3d102525-6f0d-48ed- 92f4-d71edd468ad6/building-a-happy-home.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). The cover of the report reflects that the Social Capital Project is “[a] project of the Joint Economic Committee – Republicans.” 66. See, for example, Alan J. Hawkins, “Are Federally Supported Relationship Education Programs for Lower-Income Individuals and Couples Working? A Review of Evaluation Research,” American Enterprise Institute, September 2019, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 67. H.R. 8404, Respect for Marriage Act, Public Law No. 117-228, 117th Congress, December 13, 2022, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 68. Madison Marino, “Over 1,000 Safety Violations Mar Head Start. Children Deserve Better,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, November 10, 2022, https://www.heritage.org/education/commentary/over-1000-safety- violations-mar-head-start-children-deserve-better. 69. American Hospital Association v. Becerra, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), https://www.supremecourt.gov/ opinions/21pdf/20-1114_09m1.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 70. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, “Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Federal Register, Vol. 88, No. 22 (February 2, 2023), pp. 7236–7281, https://www. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-02-02/pdf/2023-01981.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). — 502 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 71. 42 U.S. Code § 238n, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/238n (accessed March 17, 2023). 72. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, “Early Childhood Health,” last reviewed October 2022, https://mchb.hrsa.gov/programs-impact/focus-areas/early- childhood-health (accessed March 17, 2023). 73. American Pregnancy Association, “Having a Doula—What Are the Benefits?” https://americanpregnancy. org/healthy-pregnancy/labor-and-birth/having-a-doula/#:~:text=Other%20studies%20have%20shown%20 that%20having%20a%20doula,massage%20to%20reduce%20stress%20and%20anxiety%20during%20labor (accessed March 17, 2023). 74. S. 2372, VA MISSION [Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks] Act of 2018, Public Law No. 115-182, 115th Congress, June 6, 2018, https://www.congress.gov/115/plaws/publ182/ PLAW-115publ182.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 75. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Securing Updated and Necessary Statutory Evaluations Timely,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 11 (January 19, 2021), pp. 5694–5764, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-01-19/pdf/2021-00597.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023). 76. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, “Compliance with Statutory Program Integrity Requirements,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 42 (March 4, 2029), pp. 7714–7791, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-03-04/pdf/2019-03461.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 77. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, “Ensuring Access to Equitable, Affordable, Client-Centered, Quality Family Planning Services,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 192 (October 7, 2021), pp. 56144–56180, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/ pkg/FR-2021-10-07/pdf/2021-21542.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 78. S. 624, Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act, 118th Congress, introduced March 2, 2023, https://www. congress.gov/118/bills/s624/BILLS-118s624is.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 79. 50 U.S. Code Chapter 55, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/chapter-55 (accessed March 22, 2023). 80. 18 U.S. Code § 13, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/13 (accessed March 18, 2023). 81. Bowen v. American Hospital Association, 476 U.S. 610 (1986), https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/ usrep/usrep476/usrep476610/usrep476610.pdf (accessed 22, 2023). 82. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, “Notification of Interpretation and Enforcement of Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972,” Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 99 (May 25, 2021), pp. 27984–27985, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2021-05-25/pdf/2021-10477.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 83. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, “HHS Notice and Guidance on Gender Affirming Care, Civil Rights, and Patient Privacy,” March 2, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/hhs- ocr-notice-and-guidance-gender-affirming-care.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 84. Heckler v. Chaney, 420 U.S. 821 (1985), https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/470/821.html (accessed March 18, 2022). 85. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, “Guidance to Nation’s Retail Pharmacies: Obligations Under Federal Civil Rights Laws to Ensure Access to Comprehensive Reproductive Health Care Services,” content last reviewed July 14, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/civil-rights/for-individuals/ special-topics/reproductive-healthcare/pharmacies-guidance/index.html (accessed March 18, 2023). 86. H.R. 3103, “Health Insurance and Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, Public Law No. 104-191, 104th Congress, August 21, 1996, https://www.congress.gov/104/plaws/publ191/PLAW-104publ191.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 87. U.S. Department of Human Services, “HIPAA Privacy Rule and Disclosures of Information Relating to Reproductive Health Care,” content last reviewed June 29, 2022, (accessed March 18, 2023). See also “Protecting the Privacy and Security of Your Health Information When Using Your Personal Cell Phone or Tablet,” content last reviewed June 29, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/guidance/ cell-phone-hipaa/index.html (accessed March 18, 2023).

Department of Defense

Minimal

Vector: 55%

Pages: 134-136AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on establishing a national registry for Korean American divided families to facilitate reunions with North Korea, which is unrelated to the Project 2025 Department of Defense objectives concerning defense exports, FMS process reform, ITAR reduction, or military recruiting and retention."

— 101 — Department of Defense 1. Ensure that senior U.S. military leadership emphasizes exportability in the initial development of defense systems that are both available and interoperable with our partners and allies. 2. Create a funding mechanism to incentivize exportability in initial planning, which can be recouped after future FMS transactions. l End informal congressional notification. Informal congressional notification or “tiered review” is a hinderance to ensuring timely sales to our global partners. The tiered review process is not codified in law; it is merely a practice by which the Department of State provides a preview of prospective arms transfers before Congress is formally notified.9 1. End the tiered review process to eliminate at least 20 days from the FMS process. 2. Use the tiered review process only when unanimous congressional support is guaranteed in order to eliminate the “weaponization” by select Members of Congress that has prevented billions of dollars of arms sales from moving into formal congressional notification. l Minimize barriers to collaboration. The high cost of developing advanced defense platforms requires the United States to collaborate with key allies to minimize waste, complement strengths, and supplement our defense industrial base to create a system that is greater than that of the United States alone. 1. Enhance defense industrial base planning with partners to allow them to focus on niche areas where there are cost advantages for the United States. 2. Decrease International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) to facilitate trade with such allies as the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia. 3. Create opportunities to improve the health of the defense supply chain with added opportunities for partners and allies to contribute. l Reform the FMS contracting process. The contracting timeline for the FMS process is shockingly slow. On average, the DOD contracting timeline takes approximately 18 months because of slow bureaucratic processes and chronic understaffing.10 — 102 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 1. Immediately fund more contracting capacity in all services to decrease the contracting timeline and improve the delivery of defense articles to our global partners. 2. Rationalize and speed arms sales decision-making to preclude our enemies from exploiting bureaucratic slothfulness and allow us to manage the development of indigenous defense industrial bases. DOD PERSONNEL The men and women of America’s armed forces are the most critical component of our national defense strategy, but in recent years, they have been overextended, undervalued, and insufficiently resourced. Their families help them to carry the burden of service, but the assistance they receive is disproportionately less than the sacrifices they make. Young civilians who would thrive in a military environ- ment are disenfranchised when educators and influencers discourage them from learning about military service and preparing for the honor of wearing Ameri- ca’s uniform. The United States military is an extraordinary institution, staffed by exceptional people who have defended our nation and changed the course of history, but the Biden Administration, through word and deed, has treated the armed forces as just another place to work. We must restore our military to a place of honor and respect and recruit and retain the individuals who will meet the rigorous standards of excellence that are required for membership in the world’s greatest fighting force. Needed Reforms l Rescue recruiting and retention. Recruiting was the worst in 2022 that it has been in two generations and is expected to be even worse in 2023. Some of the problems are self-inflicted and ongoing. The recruiting problem is not service-specific: It affects the entire Joint Force. 1. Appoint a Special Assistant to the President who will maintain liaison with Congress, DOD, and all other interested parties on the issue of recruiting and retention. 2. Improve recruiting by suspending the use of the recently introduced MHS Genesis system that uses private medical records of potential recruits at Military Entrance Processing Stations (MEPS), creating unnecessary delays and unwarranted rejections.11 3. Improve military recruiters’ access to secondary schools and require completion of the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Sen. Kaine, Tim

A bill to designate the General George C. Marshall House in the Commonwealth of Virginia, as an affiliated area of the National Park System, and for other purposes.

119/s/603

A bill to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 10660 Page Avenue in Fairfax, Virginia, as the "Congressman Gerald E. Connolly Post Office Building".

119/s/3294

A bill to prohibit the transfer of certain offices and functions of the Department of Education to other Federal agencies, and for other purposes.

119/s/5046

Back to All Bills