The bill
Cooperative Watershed Management Program Reauthorization Act of 2026
S. 4041, 119th Congress — read as touching Pipelines & Energy Infrastructure.
Sponsored by
Sen. Daines, Steve [R-MT]
ID: D000618
Follow the money
The bill
S. 4041, 119th Congress — read as touching Pipelines & Energy Infrastructure.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
30 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Water and Power. Hearings held.
March 16, 2026
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another brilliant example of congressional incompetence, masquerading as a benevolent attempt to "reauthorize" the Cooperative Watershed Management Program. How quaint.
**Main Purpose & Objectives**
The bill's primary objective is to reauthorize the program, which is just a fancy way of saying "throw more money at it." The sponsors, Daines and Hickenlooper, claim they want to improve watershed management, but we all know that's just code for "line our pockets with pork barrel spending."
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**
The bill makes some minor tweaks to the existing program, including:
* Expanding the definition of "Indian tribe" to include those with ancestral lands within the watershed. Because, you know, Native American tribes weren't already marginalized enough. * Increasing funding for grants from $100,000 to $150,000 per year. Because what's a few million dollars among friends? * Allowing grant recipients to receive additional funding for up to two years if they demonstrate "satisfactory performance." Translation: "We'll give you more money if you do what we want." * Authorizing $40 million in appropriations from 2027 to 2031. Because who needs fiscal responsibility when there's pork to be had?
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**
The usual suspects:
* Indian tribes, who will supposedly benefit from the expanded definition and increased funding. * Local communities, who might see some minor improvements in watershed management (but let's not get too excited). * Lobbyists and special interest groups, who will undoubtedly find ways to siphon off a chunk of that sweet, sweet pork.
**Potential Impact & Implications**
This bill is a classic case of "legislative theater." It looks good on paper, but in reality, it's just a minor tweak to an existing program. The real impact will be felt by the special interest groups and lobbyists who will benefit from the increased funding and expanded definitions.
Meanwhile, the actual problems plaguing our nation's watersheds – pollution, climate change, lack of infrastructure investment – will continue to fester, ignored by our esteemed lawmakers in favor of more pressing concerns... like getting re-elected.
In short, this bill is a Band-Aid on a bullet wound. It's a pathetic attempt to address the symptoms rather than the disease. But hey, at least it'll make for some nice campaign ads come election time.
Sen. Daines, Steve [R-MT]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 2 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: H000273
Top Contributors
10
ID: K000377
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 87 nodes and 36 connections (74 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $778,565
Showing top 25 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 3 helped.
Section 2(b)(1)(A)(i) mentions including Indian tribes in the program, which could lead to increased funding for water management projects, potentially benefiting energy infrastructure companies involved in hydroelectric power or water transportation.
Section 2(b)(1)(C) mentions technical assistance such as feasibility, design, preliminary environmental review, and engineering, which could lead to increased demand for construction and engineering services.
Section 2(b)(3) authorizes $40,000,000 in appropriations for each of fiscal years 2027 through 2031, which could lead to increased funding for water management projects that benefit agricultural businesses.
America the Beautiful Act
119/s/1547
A bill to require the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to extend the time period during which licensees are required to commence construction of certain hydropower projects.
119/s/1020
A bill to allow certain Federal minerals to be mined consistent with the Bull Mountains Mining Plan Modification, and for other purposes.
119/s/362