The bill
Digital Commodity Intermediaries Act
S. 3755, 119th Congress β read as touching Crypto & Fintech.
Sponsored by
Sen. Boozman, John [R-AR]
ID: B001236
Follow the money
The bill
S. 3755, 119th Congress β read as touching Crypto & Fintech.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
23 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 312.
February 1, 2026
π Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
(sarcastic tone) Oh joy, another regulatory bill to "protect" us from the wild west of digital commodities. Because what we really need is more bureaucratic red tape to strangle innovation.
Let's dissect this monstrosity:
**New regulations being created or modified**: This bill creates a whole new set of definitions and rules for digital commodity intermediaries, including brokers, dealers, and exchanges. It's like they're trying to create a new language to confuse everyone. (Section 101)
**Affected industries and sectors**: Anyone involved in the digital commodities space, from exchanges to software developers, will be impacted by this bill. That means more compliance costs, more paperwork, and more opportunities for regulators to meddle.
**Compliance requirements and timelines**: The bill requires digital commodity intermediaries to register with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and meet various regulatory requirements, including anti-money laundering and know-your-customer rules. Because, you know, terrorists are just waiting to launder their Bitcoin through a decentralized exchange. (Section 201-212)
**Enforcement mechanisms and penalties**: The CFTC gets new powers to enforce these regulations, including the ability to impose fines and penalties on non-compliant entities. Because what's a regulatory bill without some good old-fashioned fear-mongering?
**Economic and operational impacts**: This bill will likely increase costs for digital commodity intermediaries, which will be passed on to consumers in the form of higher fees or reduced services. It may also stifle innovation by creating a barrier to entry for new players in the market.
Diagnosis: This bill is suffering from a bad case of "Regulatory Fever," where lawmakers think they can cure all ills with more rules and regulations. Symptoms include:
* Excessive use of buzzwords like "blockchain" and "decentralized finance" * Overly broad definitions that will lead to confusion and litigation * Unnecessary compliance requirements that will stifle innovation
Treatment: A healthy dose of skepticism and a strong understanding of the underlying technology would be a good start. But let's be real, this bill is just another example of politicians trying to appear relevant in the face of technological advancements they don't fully understand.
Prognosis: This bill will likely pass, because who doesn't love more regulations? It will then proceed to strangle innovation and drive up costs for consumers. Just what we needed β more government "help."
Sen. Boozman, John [R-AR]
Congress 119 β’ 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 39 nodes and 23 connections (39 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $77,600
Showing top 19 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 4 helped.
The bill establishes a regulatory framework for digital commodities, including registration requirements for digital commodity exchanges, brokers, and dealers under the CFTC, which provides clarity and legitimacy to crypto and fintech firms operating in this space (see Title I and Title II, including sections 101-110 and 201-212).
Section 208(b) amends Section 20(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act to insert 'and digital commodities' after 'securities' and 'or cleared swaps account' after 'futures account', which could impact telecom companies that engage in digital commodity trading or clearing activities, potentially increasing regulatory compliance costs but also providing clearer rules for such activities.
The bill includes provisions for software developer protections (Section 207) that exempt certain blockchain-related activities from regulation, which could benefit big tech platforms involved in blockchain development or decentralized finance systems.
Section 210(c) authorizes $150,000,000 in appropriations to carry out the Act, which could include funding for infrastructure projects related to digital commodity oversight, potentially benefiting construction and engineering firms involved in building data centers or other facilities supporting digital commodity markets.
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Sen. Boozman, John [R-AR])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022βpresent cycles. Donations are not proof of intent β they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.