Lewis & Clark Regional Water System Expansion Feasibility Study Act
Download PDFSponsored by
Sen. Thune, John [R-SD]
ID: T000250
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Water and Power. Hearings held.
March 17, 2026
Introduced
Committee Review
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.
Floor Action
Passed Senate
House Review
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another masterpiece of congressional incompetence, masquerading as a "feasibility study" for the Lewis & Clark Regional Water System Expansion. How quaint.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's primary objective is to conduct a feasibility study (read: pork barrel project) to determine whether expanding the Lewis & Clark Regional Water System in Iowa, Minnesota, and South Dakota is a good idea. Spoiler alert: it's not about the water; it's about the money.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill requires the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study (because we clearly need more studies) and develop a feasibility report that will inevitably recommend authorizing construction, despite the project's dubious merits. The non-federal project entity (i.e., the Lewis and Clark Rural Water System, Inc.) gets to participate in this farce, ensuring their interests are well-represented.
The bill also establishes a cost-sharing agreement for feasibility study costs, because why should taxpayers foot the entire bill? Oh wait, they will. The federal share of costs is capped at 50%, but don't worry, that's just a minor detail; we'll find ways to exceed it. And, of course, there's an authorization of appropriations for $10 million, because what's a little more debt among friends?
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects:
* The Lewis and Clark Rural Water System, Inc., which will benefit from the expansion (and likely has already lined up contractors and suppliers). * Local governments in Iowa, Minnesota, and South Dakota, who'll get to "consult" on the project (i.e., rubber-stamp it). * Federal agencies, which will pretend to care about environmental impact assessments. * Taxpayers, who'll foot the bill for this boondoggle.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a classic example of legislative theater. The study will likely conclude that expansion is necessary (because who needs actual evidence?), and construction will commence, fueled by pork barrel politics and crony capitalism. Expect:
* Wasteful spending on unnecessary infrastructure. * Increased water rates for local residents. * Environmental degradation from the project's impact. * More opportunities for corruption and kickbacks.
In short, this bill is a symptom of a deeper disease: the insatiable appetite for government largesse and the willingness to sacrifice common sense at the altar of special interests. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have better things to do than analyze the latest Congressional abomination.
Related Topics
💰 Campaign Finance Network
Sen. Thune, John [R-SD]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No organization contributions found
Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance
This bill has 5 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
Sen. Rounds, Mike [R-SD]
ID: R000605
Top Contributors
10
Sen. Klobuchar, Amy [D-MN]
ID: K000367
Top Contributors
10
Sen. Grassley, Chuck [R-IA]
ID: G000386
Top Contributors
10
Sen. Ernst, Joni [R-IA]
ID: E000295
Top Contributors
10
Sen. Smith, Tina [D-MN]
ID: S001203
Top Contributors
10
Donor Network - Sen. Thune, John [R-SD]
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 30 nodes and 40 connections
Total contributions: $134,581
Top Donors - Sen. Thune, John [R-SD]
Showing top 16 donors by contribution amount