The bill
Water Power Research and Development Reauthorization Act
S. 3684, 119th Congress β read as touching Renewable Energy.
Sponsored by
Sen. Murkowski, Lisa [R-AK]
ID: M001153
Follow the money
The bill
S. 3684, 119th Congress β read as touching Renewable Energy.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
29 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Water and Power. Hearings held.
March 16, 2026
π Current Status
Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another bill, another exercise in futility. Let's dissect this mess.
**Main Purpose & Objectives**
The Water Power Research and Development Reauthorization Act (S 3684) is a rehashing of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, with some minor tweaks to make it seem like something new. The main purpose is to reauthorize funding for water power research, development, demonstration, and commercial application activities. Because, you know, we need more bureaucratic jargon to justify throwing money at a problem.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**
The bill makes some minor changes to existing law, including:
* Redefining terms to make them sound more impressive * Adding new research areas, such as scalable manufacturing of composite and additive manufactured marine energy components (because who doesn't love buzzwords?) * Expanding the scope of hydropower research to include cybersecurity (because, you know, hackers are just waiting to take down our dams) * Streamlining the licensing process for hydropower projects (good luck with that)
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**
The usual suspects:
* The energy industry, which will receive more funding for "research" and "development" * Environmental groups, who will pretend to be concerned about the impact of water power on ecosystems * Local communities, who will be promised jobs and economic growth (but won't actually see any) * Tribal entities, who will get some token funding for workforce development programs
**Potential Impact & Implications**
This bill is a classic case of "more of the same." It's a reauthorization of existing programs with minor tweaks to make it seem like something new. The impact will be negligible, except for the energy industry, which will receive more funding for their pet projects.
The real disease here is the lack of vision and leadership in our government. Instead of addressing the root causes of our energy problems, we're just throwing money at symptoms. It's like trying to cure a patient with a Band-Aid instead of treating the underlying illness.
In conclusion, this bill is a waste of time and resources. It's a perfect example of how our government operates: lots of noise, little substance, and plenty of opportunities for special interests to line their pockets. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have better things to do than analyze this drivel.
Sen. Murkowski, Lisa [R-AK]
Congress 119 β’ 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 1 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: W000779
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 59 nodes and 32 connections (63 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $82,350
Showing top 21 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 4 helped.
Section 2(b) adds a new paragraph (5) to Section 633 to advance scalable US-based manufacturing of composite and additive manufactured marine energy components through collaborations with regional institutions and industry, directly supporting marine renewable energy technology development.
Section 2(c)(10)(D) adds improving methods for incorporating hydropower and pumped storage in grid modeling systems, which benefits electric utilities by enhancing grid integration of hydropower resources.
Section 2(d)(8) adds data centers, subsea or offshore power, microgrids, sensors, and communications systems to marine energy applications, supporting energy infrastructure development for marine energy projects.
Section 2(d)(6) inserts cooperative defense research and development through demonstration projects with the Department of Defense and the Navy for resilient coastal power and surveillance systems, creating opportunities for defense contractors.
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Sen. Murkowski, Lisa [R-AK])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022βpresent cycles. Donations are not proof of intent β they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.
Tradeable Energy Performance Standards Act
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating to "Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Walk-In Coolers and Walk-In Freezers".
CORE Act of 2025