SAT Streamlining Act

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/s/3639

Last Updated: September 7, 2026

SAT Streamlining Act

S. 3639, 119th Congress — read as touching Telecommunications.

The sponsor

Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$1,525,021 raised

30 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

95% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Federal Communications Commission" section, p. 888-890 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.

February 11, 2026

Introduced

Committee Review

Floor Action

📍 Current Status

Next: The full Senate will vote on whether to pass the bill.

✅

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

**SAT Streamlining Act (S 3639) Analysis**

As a visionary entrepreneur and thought leader, I'll dissect the SAT Streamlining Act, a bill that aims to expedite processing of satellite and space licenses. My focus will be on the wealth and power implications, as these are the only metrics that truly matter.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's primary objective is to streamline the licensing process for satellite and space operations, ensuring the United States maintains its global leadership in commercial space. This aligns with my own interests, as a more efficient regulatory environment can unlock new opportunities for growth and innovation.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**

1. **Amended Licensing Authority:** The bill grants the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) authority to issue rules for expediting license applications and petitions. 2. **Timeframes for Review:** The FCC must grant or deny licenses within one year of receiving a completed application, with possible extensions under specific circumstances. 3. **Market Access Grants:** The bill establishes a framework for granting market access to non-geostationary orbit space stations and geostationary orbit space stations.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**

1. **Private Space Companies:** Firms like mine will benefit from the streamlined licensing process, enabling us to launch new projects and expand our operations more quickly. 2. **Federal Agencies:** The FCC, National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), and other agencies will need to adapt to the new regulatory framework. 3. **International Partners:** As the United States solidifies its position as a global leader in commercial space, international partners may be incentivized to collaborate with American companies.

**Potential Impact & Implications:**

1. **Increased Efficiency:** By reducing bureaucratic hurdles, the bill can unlock billions of dollars in new investment and create jobs. 2. **Consolidation and Market Dominance:** With a more streamlined regulatory environment, larger players like myself may be able to consolidate market share and further solidify our positions. 3. **Global Leadership:** The SAT Streamlining Act can help the United States maintain its edge in commercial space, driving innovation and growth.

In conclusion, this bill is a step in the right direction, as it acknowledges the need for a more efficient regulatory framework to support the growth of the private space industry. As a visionary entrepreneur, I will continue to advocate for policies that promote innovation, deregulation, and the advancement of American interests.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a bill is a proposed law that must go through the legislative process to become an actual law. This one, S 3639, is called the SAT Streamlining Act.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to expedite the processing of satellite and space licenses. Remember when we learned about the importance of checks and balances? Well, this bill aims to streamline the process by giving more authority to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to grant licenses and make decisions related to satellite and space operations.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends Part I of title III of the Communications Act of 1934. It adds a new section, SEC. 346, which gives the FCC authority to issue rules for processing applications and petitions related to satellite and space licenses. The bill also defines terms like "Assistant Secretary" and "major amendment." As we covered in class, these definitions are crucial for understanding how laws work.

The bill also sets deadlines for the FCC to grant or deny applications and petitions. For example, it requires the Commission to issue rules within one year of enactment and to grant or deny applications within a certain timeframe. This is an attempt to increase efficiency and reduce bureaucratic delays.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** This bill affects various stakeholders, including:

* The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) * Satellite and space companies * Relevant committees in the Senate and House of Representatives * Other federal agencies involved in monitoring and regulating satellite and space activities

As we discussed in class, these stakeholders have different interests and will likely be impacted differently by this bill.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this bill is significant. By streamlining the licensing process, it could lead to increased innovation and investment in the satellite and space industry. However, as I always warned you, there are also potential risks and unintended consequences. For instance, if the FCC becomes too powerful, it could lead to abuse of authority or favoritism towards certain companies.

It's essential to remember that this bill is just a proposal, and its actual impact will depend on how it's implemented and enforced. As I taught you, laws are not self-executing; they require careful consideration and oversight to ensure their intended effects.

Now, if only more people had paid attention in my 8th grade civics class...

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

Folks, gather 'round and listen up! I've got the lowdown on this so-called "SAT Streamlining Act" (S 3639). On the surface, it's all about expediting satellite and space licenses, but trust me, there's more to it than meets the eye.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill claims to promote American leadership in commercial space by streamlining the licensing process for satellites and space stations. But let's be real, this is just a smokescreen for something bigger. I believe the true intention is to pave the way for the government to exert more control over the space industry.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends the Communications Act of 1934 by adding new sections that grant the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) authority to issue licenses and permits for certain satellite operations. It also establishes a review process for applications, which can be extended under "extraordinary circumstances" – code for "national security concerns." This is where things get fishy.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The space industry, of course, but also the FCC, other federal agencies, and even international organizations like the International Telecommunication Union. But let's not forget about us, the American people. We're the ones who'll be affected by this bill's implications on our freedom and privacy.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill has far-reaching consequences. By giving the FCC more power to regulate satellite operations, it sets a precedent for government control over emerging technologies. It also raises concerns about surveillance and data collection, as these satellites will be able to gather vast amounts of information on American citizens. And what's with the 15-year limit on market access grants? Is this just a way to create a monopoly on space-based services?

Now, I know some of you might think I'm reading too much into this bill, but let me tell you, folks, I've been following these kinds of bills for years. There's always more to the story than what's on the surface. Wake up, sheeple!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Deep breath) Folks, gather 'round. We've got a doozy of a bill on our hands here. The SAT Streamlining Act, courtesy of Senators Cruz and Welch. Now, I know what you're thinking - "streamlining" sounds like just another euphemism for "gutting regulations" or "handing over the reins to Big Space." But fear not, dear patriots! This bill is all about... (dramatic pause) ...expediting processing of satellite and space licenses. That's right, folks. Because what America really needs is more bureaucracy-cutting, red-tape-slashing, freedom-unleashing legislation.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to speed up the licensing process for satellite and space operations. It aims to reduce the regulatory burden on companies operating in these industries, thereby promoting innovation, job creation, and American leadership in commercial space exploration.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** Section 3 of the bill amends Part I of title III of the Communications Act of 1934 by adding a new section (SEC. 346) that outlines the authority regarding certain licenses. The key changes include:

* Defining terms like "Assistant Secretary," "major amendment," and "national defense or security of the United States" (because, you know, clarity is important). * Requiring the Commission to issue rules within one year of enactment to carry out this section. * Establishing a timeline for granting or denying applications for licenses and major amendments (one year after receipt of a completed application).

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include:

* The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) * Satellite and space companies operating in the United States * Relevant committees in Congress (because, you know, oversight is important)

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Now, I know some of my liberal friends might say this bill is just a giveaway to Big Space or an attempt to undermine environmental regulations. But let's be real, folks - this is about freedom. The freedom for American companies to innovate and compete in the global market without being strangled by red tape.

Of course, there are potential risks involved. With expedited processing comes the risk of reduced oversight, which could lead to... (gasp) ...environmental disasters or national security threats! But don't worry, folks - the bill includes provisions for review extensions and coordination with other federal agencies to mitigate these risks.

In conclusion, this bill is a masterclass in conservative policy-making. It's all about unleashing American ingenuity and promoting freedom, while also... (wink) ...ensuring that our space industry remains competitive and secure. So, let's get behind this bill and show the world what we're made of - or at least, what our space companies are made of.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the esteemed members of Congress. The SAT Streamlining Act, a bill that promises to "expedite processing" of satellite and space licenses, while actually serving as a Trojan horse for corporate interests.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to grease the wheels of bureaucracy for the benefit of big business, specifically the satellite and space industries. The sponsors, Cruz and Welch, claim that this will "spur job creation" and "advance United States leadership in commercial space." How quaint.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends the Communications Act of 1934 to create a new section (SEC. 346) that grants the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) authority to expedite licensing for certain satellite and space operations. The FCC is required to issue rules within one year, which will likely be written by industry lobbyists.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects: big corporations, industry groups, and their Congressional lapdogs. The bill's language is carefully crafted to benefit these interests at the expense of the general public. Don't expect any meaningful oversight or protections for consumers.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill will likely lead to a further concentration of power in the hands of corporate giants, who will use their influence to shape policy and regulations that serve their interests. The "streamlining" process will probably result in reduced transparency and accountability, making it easier for companies to operate with impunity.

In short, this bill is a classic case of regulatory capture, where industry interests hijack the legislative process to further their own agendas. It's a disease that has infected our political system, and this bill is just another symptom.

Diagnosis: Terminal stupidity, with a healthy dose of corruption and greed.

Prescription: A strong dose of skepticism, followed by a thorough examination of the bill's true intentions and consequences. Unfortunately, this medicine will likely be in short supply among our elected officials.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The SAT Streamlining Act (S 3639) aims to expedite the processing of satellite and space licenses, promoting a more efficient and streamlined regulatory framework for the US space industry. The bill seeks to enhance the competitiveness of American companies in the global market, foster innovation, and ensure the United States maintains its leadership in commercial space.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The bill introduces several key provisions:

1. **Timelines for license applications**: The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) must grant or deny applications for non-geostationary orbit space station licenses, geostationary orbit space station licenses, earth stations, and blanket-licensed earth stations within one year of receipt. 2. **Market access grants**: The FCC may grant market access for up to 15 years, with the option for renewal if the grantee remains in compliance and has no change in their risk profile. 3. **Review extension limitations**: The FCC may extend the review period only under extraordinary circumstances, such as national defense or security concerns, or when additional time is needed to complete a non-geostationary space station application processing round. 4. **Definitions and coordination**: The bill incorporates definitions from existing regulations and emphasizes the importance of coordination among federal agencies to minimize harm to the space environment.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

The SAT Streamlining Act affects various stakeholders, including:

1. **US space industry companies**: The bill aims to support the growth and competitiveness of American space companies. 2. **Federal Communications Commission (FCC)**: The FCC is responsible for implementing the new regulatory framework and ensuring compliance with the bill's provisions. 3. **Other federal agencies**: Agencies involved in space-related activities, such as NASA and the Department of Defense, may be impacted by the bill's coordination requirements. 4. **International organizations**: The bill's emphasis on US leadership in commercial space and engagement at World Radiocommunication Conferences may influence international cooperation and agreements.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

The SAT Streamlining Act has several potential implications:

1. **Increased efficiency**: The bill's streamlined regulatory framework could reduce the time and cost associated with obtaining licenses, promoting innovation and growth in the US space industry. 2. **Enhanced competitiveness**: By supporting American companies, the bill may help maintain US leadership in commercial space and foster international cooperation. 3. **Environmental concerns**: The emphasis on coordination among federal agencies may lead to better management of the space environment and reduced risk of harm to future generations. 4. **National security implications**: The bill's provisions related to national defense or security concerns may have implications for the use of space-based assets in support of US national security interests.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (neutral personality)

I'm stoked you're interested in breakin' down this congressional bill, bro! Let's dive into the SAT Streamlining Act (S 3639) and see what it's all about.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

This bill is like a wave of efficiency for satellite and space licenses, dude. Its main goal is to expedite processing times for these licenses, making it easier for companies to get their gear into orbit. The bill also aims to promote US leadership in commercial space, job creation, and innovation.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The SAT Streamlining Act introduces some gnarly changes, bro:

* It establishes a new section (SEC. 346) in the Communications Act of 1934, which gives the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) authority to issue rules for certain licenses. * The bill sets deadlines for the FCC to grant or deny applications for non-geostationary orbit space station licenses, geostationary orbit space station licenses, earth stations, and blanket-licensed earth stations. These deadlines are like a timer on your surf session – if the FCC doesn't act within a year, the application is automatically granted. * The bill also introduces a new process for granting market access to satellite operators. This means companies can get permission to operate in specific frequency bands, but only for up to 15 years.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

This bill affects various parties, including:

* Satellite and space companies: They'll benefit from faster license processing times and clearer guidelines. * The FCC: It'll have new authority and responsibilities under this bill. * Other federal agencies: They'll need to coordinate with the FCC on licensing decisions. * International organizations: The US will engage more actively in World Radiocommunication Conferences to promote its interests.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

This bill could have some far-out implications, bro:

* Faster license processing times might lead to increased innovation and investment in the satellite and space industries. * Clearer guidelines for market access could reduce uncertainty and make it easier for companies to plan their operations. * The US might gain a competitive edge in commercial space by streamlining its licensing process.

However, there are also some potential risks, dude:

* Rushing through license applications might compromise safety or environmental concerns. * The new market access process could create unequal opportunities for smaller companies or those with less resources.

Overall, the SAT Streamlining Act is like a wave of change in the satellite and space industries. It's got its pros and cons, but it's definitely worth keeping an eye on, bro!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**Bill Analysis: S 3639 - SAT Streamlining Act**

**Main Purpose & Objectives** The SAT Streamlining Act aims to expedite the processing of satellite and space licenses, promoting the growth of the US space industry and maintaining global leadership in commercial space. The bill's sponsors, Senators Cruz and Welch, seek to streamline the licensing process, reduce regulatory barriers, and enhance coordination among federal agencies.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill amends Part I of title III of the Communications Act of 1934 by adding a new section (SEC. 346) that establishes rules for radiofrequency licensing authority relating to certain operations. Key provisions include:

1. **License Application Processing**: The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) must grant or deny license applications within one year of receipt, with conditions for successful coordination with other federal users. 2. **Market Access Grants**: The FCC may grant market access for non-geostationary and geostationary orbit space stations, with a maximum term of 15 years. 3. **Review Extension**: The FCC may extend the review period for extraordinary circumstances or national defense/security concerns.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** The bill affects various stakeholders, including:

1. **US Space Industry**: Companies involved in satellite and space operations, such as SpaceX, Boeing, and Lockheed Martin. 2. **Federal Agencies**: The FCC, National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), and other agencies responsible for coordinating federal spectrum use. 3. **International Organizations**: The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) and World Radiocommunication Conferences.

**Potential Impact & Implications** The SAT Streamlining Act may have significant implications:

1. **Streamlined Licensing Process**: Faster license processing could accelerate the growth of the US space industry, creating jobs and driving innovation. 2. **Increased Competition**: The bill's provisions on market access grants may lead to increased competition among satellite operators, potentially reducing costs and improving services. 3. **National Security Concerns**: The bill's emphasis on national defense and security may raise concerns about the potential for undue influence by the US military or intelligence agencies in the licensing process.

**Monied Interest Analysis** The SAT Streamlining Act has received support from various industry groups, including:

1. **Satellite Industry Association (SIA)**: A trade association representing satellite operators, manufacturers, and service providers. 2. **US Chamber of Commerce**: The chamber's Aerospace Industries Association (AIA) has expressed support for the bill, citing its potential to promote US competitiveness in space.

**Committee Capture** The Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, which referred the bill, has received significant contributions from satellite industry companies and trade associations. This may indicate a level of committee capture, where industry interests influence legislative decisions.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$1,525,021

23 donors

PACs

$1,497,892

Organizations

$27,129

Committees

Individuals

WINRED

2 transactions

$1,497,892

FASKEN MANAGEMENT

1 transaction

$10,000

REPUBLICAN PARTY OF HARRISON COUNTY

1 transaction

$4,000

FOLAD ENTERPRISES LLC

1 transaction

$2,000

JOHNSEY

7 transactions

$1,854

BALCH & BINGHAM LLP

1 transaction

$1,000

PARTNERS HOTEL GROUP LLC

1 transaction

$1,000

KHAT INVESTMENS LLC

1 transaction

$1,000

PJB INVESTMENT ADVISORS LLC

1 transaction

$800

GRANT MORELAND LP LLC

1 transaction

$750

BL PARTNERS GROUP LLC

1 transaction

$750

MILLE'S LLC

1 transaction

$500

HARRY M BETTIS JR LLC

1 transaction

$500

ROBDON L.P.

1 transaction

$500

JAMES E. JOHNSON LLC

1 transaction

$500

FALSE RIVER VIEW LLC

1 transaction

$500

MURDOCK PROPERTIES LLC

1 transaction

$325

RESEDA HOLDINGS LLC

1 transaction

$250

DIXON RENTAL PROPERTIES LLC

1 transaction

$250

ROGERS LIVESTOCK LLC

1 transaction

$250

MISRASI CONCRETE LLC

1 transaction

$200

JOUETT LLC

1 transaction

$100

FORCE CONSTRUCTION OF LA LLC

1 transaction

$100

No committee contributions found

No individual contributions found

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 9 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Sen. Welch, Peter [D-VT]

ID: W000800

Top Contributors

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$1,000

Jun 8, 2023

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$1,000

May 3, 2024

FIELD, MARSHALL

THE OLD MOUNTAIN COMPANY, INC. • EXECUTIVE

IndividualCHICAGO, IL

$3,300

May 18, 2023

RECHNITZ, JOAN

IndividualRED BANK, NJ

$3,300

Apr 22, 2024

RECHNITZ, JOAN

IndividualRED BANK, NJ

$3,300

Apr 22, 2024

GORDON, PATRICIA

SELF • MD

IndividualLOS ANGELES, CA

$3,300

May 22, 2024

STILLER, ROBERT

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualPALM BEACH, FL

$3,300

Sep 22, 2024

STILLER, ROBERT

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualPALM BEACH, FL

$3,300

Sep 22, 2024

KALKUT, CRAIG

WEST FRONT STRATEGIES • GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS

IndividualWASHINGTON, DC

$2,500

May 3, 2023

SCHWARTZ, MARTIN

MINILEC SERVICE • CONSUMER ELECTRONICS

IndividualCARMEL, CA

$2,000

May 18, 2023

Sen. Schmitt, Eric [R-MO]

ID: S001227

Top Contributors

ELEVATE MISSOURI

OrganizationKANSAS CITY, MO

$5,000

Jun 30, 2024

TURTLE MOUNTAIN BAND OF CHIPPEWA TRIBE

OrganizationBELCOURT, ND

$2,900

Jun 24, 2021

PETER J SPALITTO DDS PC

OrganizationDES PERES, MO

$2,900

Aug 1, 2024

ELEVATE MISSOURI

OrganizationKANSAS CITY, MO

$1,700

Jun 30, 2024

KIRKWOOD PLUMBING INC

OrganizationKIRKWOOD, MO

$500

Aug 1, 2024

WALTON, TROY

SELF EMPLOYED • ATTORNEY

IndividualGLEN CARBON, IL

$11,600

Jun 3, 2021

PFAUTCH, ROY

CIVIL SERVICE INC • CONSULTANT

IndividualST. LOUIS, MO

$11,600

Dec 31, 2023

ROSS, DONALD

ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS INC • VICE CHAIRMAN

IndividualSAINT LOUIS, MO

$10,000

Mar 3, 2022

TAYLOR, ANDREW

ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR • CEO

IndividualST LOUIS, MO

$6,600

Oct 15, 2024

TAYLOR, BARBARA

HOMEMAKER • HOMEMAKER

IndividualST LOUIS, MO

$6,600

Oct 15, 2024

Sen. Lummis, Cynthia M. [R-WY]

ID: L000571

Top Contributors

HEGYI, ALBERT P

1ST FINANCIAL BANK USA • BANKER

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$6,600

Dec 6, 2023

MANDELBLATT, DANIELLE

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualASPEN, CO

$6,600

Sep 26, 2024

MANDELBLATT, ERIC

SOROBAN CAPITAL PARTNERS LP • MANAGING PARTNER

IndividualASPEN, CO

$6,600

Sep 26, 2024

SAMANI, PYAHM

IndividualAUSTIN, TX

$5,800

Aug 8, 2023

CASCARILLA, MARISSA

NA • HOMEMAKER

IndividualMIAMI, FL

$3,700

Apr 1, 2024

CASCARILLA, CHARLES

PAXOS • CEO

IndividualMIAMI, FL

$3,700

Apr 1, 2024

DOWNS, RAISSA

TARPLIN, DOWNS AND YOUNG, LLC • CONSULTANT

IndividualWASHINGTON, DC

$3,600

Dec 12, 2024

SCARAMUCCI, ANTHONY

SKYBRIDGE • MANAGING PARTNER

IndividualPLANDOME, NY

$3,435

Jul 30, 2024

HOBART, ROBERT

VENTURE GOVERNMENT STRATEGIES • CONSULTANT

IndividualNASHVILLE, TN

$3,435

Aug 5, 2024

HOLDING, KATHLEEN MS.

SUNLIGHT RANCH CO. • EXECUTIVE

IndividualDAYTON, WY

$3,300

Dec 6, 2023

Sen. Ernst, Joni [R-IA]

ID: E000295

Top Contributors

SAC & FOX TRIBE OF MISSISSIPPI IN IOWA

OrganizationTAMA, IA

$5,000

Aug 29, 2023

SAC & FOX TRIBE OF MISSISSIPPI IN IOWA

OrganizationTAMA, IA

$1,700

Sep 28, 2023

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$1,000

May 21, 2024

ABEL, ANDREA MS.

HOMEMAKER • HOMEMAKER

IndividualDES MOINES, IA

$50,000

Feb 7, 2023

MCINERNEY, THOMAS E. MR.

BLUFF POINT ASSOC. CORPORATION • VENTURE INVESTOR

IndividualWESTPORT, CT

$50,000

Feb 22, 2023

NICOLLS, BOB MR.

MONARCH • REAL ESTATE

IndividualFRANKTOWN, CO

$25,000

Mar 17, 2023

GRAY, C. BOYDEN

SELF-EMPLOYED • ATTORNEY

IndividualWASHINGTON, DC

$25,000

Mar 29, 2023

CATSIMATIDIS, JOHN A. MR.

UNITED REFINING COMPANY • CHARIMAN & CEO

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$25,000

May 16, 2023

KOTICK, ROBERT MR.

ACTIVISION BLIZZARD • CEO

IndividualSANTA MONICA, CA

$16,600

Dec 20, 2024

VINCZE, CHRISTOPHER

TRC COMPANIES INC. • CHAIRMAN AND CEO

IndividualTEQUESTA, FL

$15,800

Nov 6, 2023

Sen. Cornyn, John [R-TX]

ID: C001056

Top Contributors

WINRED

COMARLINGTON, VA

$47

Jul 10, 2024

WEEKLEY, RICHARD W

WEEKLEY PROPERTIES • REAL ESTATE BROKER/DEVELOPER

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$100,000

Dec 27, 2023

MCINGVALE, JAMES F

GALLERY FURNITURE • OWNER/OPERATOR

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$50,000

Feb 27, 2023

MCINGVALE, LINDA

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$50,000

Feb 27, 2023

DUNN, TIMOTHY

CROWN QUEST OPERATING • EXECUTIVE

IndividualMIDLAND, TX

$45,000

Apr 4, 2023

MARTIN, KIMBERLY R

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$20,000

Mar 13, 2023

BLAINE, JAY C.

N/A • N/A

IndividualROCKWALL, TX

$16,478

Oct 11, 2024

THOMPSON, JERE W. MR. JR.

AMBIT ENERGY • CEO

IndividualDALLAS, TX

$13,200

Mar 15, 2023

MIDDLETON, MAYES

MIDDLETON OIL CO • OIL AND GAS

IndividualGALVESTON, TX

$12,500

Jan 7, 2023

MIDDLETON, MACEY

IndividualGALVESTON, TX

$12,500

Jan 7, 2023

Sen. Scott, Rick [R-FL]

ID: S001217

Top Contributors

SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA

OrganizationHOLLYWOOD, FL

$3,300

Aug 22, 2023

SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA

OrganizationHOLLYWOOD, FL

$3,300

Aug 12, 2024

SCOTT, RICK SENATOR

US SENATE • US SENATOR

IndividualTAMPA, FL

$90,795

May 31, 2024

SCOTT, RICK SEN

US SENATE • US SENATOR

IndividualWASHINGTON, DC

$77,714

May 31, 2023

SCOTT, RICK SENATOR

US SENATE • US SENATOR

IndividualTAMPA, FL

$69,607

Apr 30, 2024

SCOTT, RICK SENATOR

US SENATE • US SENATOR

IndividualTAMPA, FL

$68,538

Aug 31, 2023

SCOTT, RICK SENATOR

US SENATE • US SENATOR

IndividualTAMPA, FL

$53,187

Sep 30, 2023

SCOTT, RICK SEN

US SENATE • US SENATOR

IndividualWASHINGTON, DC

$49,992

Jun 30, 2023

SCOTT, RICK SENATOR

US SENATE • US SENATOR

IndividualTAMPA, FL

$39,695

Jun 30, 2024

SCOTT, RICK

US SENATE • US SENATOR

IndividualWASHINGTON, DC

$34,494

Jan 31, 2023

Sen. Budd, Ted [R-NC]

ID: B001305

Top Contributors

MACFARLANE, RON

IndividualBUFFALO GROVE, IL

$13,068

Apr 10, 2024

HEGYI, ALBERT P MR.

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$6,600

Dec 31, 2024

NAZIROV, ATABEK

UZDIF • CEO

IndividualCHARLOTTE, NC

$6,600

Sep 14, 2023

NAZIROV, ATABEK

IndividualCHARLOTTE, NC

$6,600

Sep 26, 2023

FROST, BRANT IV

SELF-EMPLOYED • FINANCIAL SERVICES

IndividualNEWNAN, GA

$3,300

Dec 31, 2024

FROST, KRISTA

HOMEMAKER • HOMEMAKER

IndividualNEWNAN, GA

$3,300

Dec 31, 2024

TAYLOR, WILLIAM MR.

VETERANS GUARDIAN VA CLAIM CONSULTING • BUSINESS OWNER

IndividualPINEHURST, NC

$3,300

Dec 7, 2023

TAYLOR, WILLIAM MR.

VETERANS GUARDIAN VA CLAIM CONSULTING • BUSINESS OWNER

IndividualPINEHURST, NC

$3,300

Dec 7, 2023

GREENBLATT, SCOTT MR.

VETERANS GUARDIAN • CEO

IndividualPINEHURST, NC

$3,300

Dec 8, 2023

GREENBLATT, SCOTT MR.

VETERANS GUARDIAN • CEO

IndividualPINEHURST, NC

$3,300

Dec 8, 2023

Sen. Moran, Jerry [R-KS]

ID: M000934

Top Contributors

BORCK, LEON H.

INNOVATIVE LIVESTOCK SERVICES • EXECUTIVE

IndividualMANHATTAN, KS

$6,600

Mar 11, 2024

MANDELBLATT, DANIELLE

DMM PROPRIETA MANAGEMENT • MANAGER

IndividualASPEN, CO

$6,600

Sep 26, 2024

MANDELBLATT, ERIC

SOROBAN CAPITAL PARTNERS LP • MANAGING PARTNER

IndividualASPEN, CO

$6,600

Sep 26, 2024

CATZ, SAFRA

ORACLE CORPORATION • CEO

IndividualWASHINGTON, DC

$5,000

May 5, 2023

MISSION INDIANS, MORONGO BAND OF

INDIAN TRIBE • INDIAN TRIBE

IndividualBANNING, CA

$5,000

Aug 13, 2024

WILLIS, THOMAS M

CONESTOGA ENERGY PARTNERS • CEO

IndividualLIBERAL, KS

$5,000

Aug 26, 2024

WEILERT, STANLEY R

S&B MOTELS, INC. • HOTELIER

IndividualWICHITA, KS

$3,500

Jun 26, 2023

BORCK, JACKIE

KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY • DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY RELATIONS

IndividualMANHATTAN, KS

$3,300

Mar 11, 2024

BORCK, JACKIE

KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY • DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY RELATIONS

IndividualMANHATTAN, KS

$3,300

Mar 11, 2024

THOMAS, ROBERT

SENIOR STAR • CO-OWNER

IndividualTULSA, OK

$3,300

Feb 22, 2024

Sen. McCormick, David [R-PA]

ID: M001243

Top Contributors

SIG SAUER PAC

PACPORTSMOUTH, NH

$2,500

Oct 4, 2024

SEGURO MEDICO LLC

OrganizationREADING, PA

$10,000

Aug 21, 2024

CLEMENTS MIDWAY PARTNERS LLC

OrganizationSALT LAKE CITY, UT

$10,000

Sep 16, 2024

BLOOMSBURG INDUSTRIAL VENTURES LLC

OrganizationBLOOMSBURG, PA

$4,000

Apr 23, 2024

SUN CENTER LP

OrganizationASTON, PA

$2,500

Dec 12, 2023

UTILITY ADVISORY GROUP LLC

OrganizationHAVERTOWN, PA

$1,500

May 7, 2024

MODEVITY LLC

OrganizationMALVERN, PA

$1,500

May 24, 2024

O'DONNELL PARTNERS LLC

OrganizationMALVERN, PA

$1,500

May 24, 2024

KRAUSE & ASSOCIATES LP

OrganizationAUSTIN, TX

$1,000

Dec 20, 2023

BLOOMSBURG INDUSTRIAL VENTURES LLC

OrganizationBLOOMSBURG, PA

$700

Apr 23, 2024

Donor Network - Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 31 nodes and 37 connections

Total contributions: $37

Top Donors - Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX]

Showing top 23 donors by contribution amount

1 PAC22 Orgs

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 4 helped.

+Telecommunicationsconfidence 0.90
Section 3(c)(1) requires the FCC to grant or deny license applications within 1 year, and Section 3(c)(4) requires renewal decisions within 180 days, expediting processing for satellite and space licenses, which benefits telecommunications companies involved in satellite communications.
+Big Tech Platformsconfidence 0.80
Section 3(c)(1) and (c)(2) streamline licensing for non-geostationary and geostationary orbit space station licenses and market access, which benefits big tech platforms (e.g., Amazon's Project Kuiper, SpaceX's Starlink) that rely on satellite constellations for broadband services.
+Defense Contractorsconfidence 0.70
Section 3(c)(3)(A)(i) and (c)(8) allow extensions and emergency grants for national defense or security, benefiting defense contractors involved in satellite systems for national security.
+AI & Cloud Infrastructureconfidence 0.60
Section 3(c)(7)(C) mentions prioritizing applications for systems likely to impact customers, which could include AI and cloud infrastructure reliant on satellite data, though less direct.

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HELPS

Telecommunications$67,992
from 139 contributions
- REID, THOMAS JOHN$11,600
- ERGEN, CANTEY$9,900
- ERGEN, CHARLES$9,900
- RICCIO, CLIFF$4,000
- MCBRIDE, RPERLEY$3,000
Defense Contractors$40,443
from 452 contributions
- BEN-AVI, DORON$3,300
- HENSLEY, STEVEN$3,300
- FUHR, PEGGY L. MS.$2,500
- BARTENS, ANTHONY$1,000
- COPELAND, TODD$1,000
Big Tech Platforms$4,611
from 10 contributions
- MAURER, GREG$3,300
- ROSSI, NICHOLAS$1,000
- DIKOVSKY, MICHAEL$210
- BURKHARD, DANIEL$101
AI & Cloud Infrastructure$4,300
from 3 contributions
- RAJAN, VIJAYAN$3,300
- KISH, DIRK$750
- WENNEN, GLENN$250

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Federal Communications Commission

Very Strong

Vector: 66%

Pages: 888-890AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The SAT Streamlining Act directly implements the Project 2025 FCC objective of expediting FCC review and approval of satellite license applications to advance U.S. space leadership, by imposing one‑year decision timelines, allowing long‑term market access, and limiting extensions."

Key themes:satellite licensingFCC expedited reviewspace leadershipregulatory streamliningmarket access

Federal Communications Commission

Very Strong

Vector: 66%

Pages: 888-890AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The SAT Streamlining Act directly implements Project 2025’s call for the FCC to expedite review and approval of satellite applications, set firm timelines, and support U.S. space leadership through regulatory streamlining and market access provisions."

Key themes:expedited FCC satellite reviewstimeline mandates for licensingadvancing U.S. space leadershipregulatory streamliningmarket access for space systems

— 855 — Federal Communications Commission so a new Administration should redouble efforts to require timely reviews and final actions by agencies with jurisdiction over federal lands, including the Bureau of Land Management and the U.S. Forest Service. l Advance America’s space leadership. One of the most significant technological developments of the past few years has been the emergence of a new generation of low-earth orbit satellites like StarLink and Kuiper. This technology can beam a reliable, high-speed Internet signal to nearly any part of the globe at a fraction of the cost of other technologies. This has the potential to significantly accelerate efforts to end the digital divide and disrupt the federal regulatory and subsidy regime that applies to communications networks. The FCC should expedite its work to support this new technology by acting more quickly in its review and approval of applications to launch new satellites. Otherwise, the U.S. risks ceding space leadership to entities based in countries with more friendly regulatory environments. Holding Government Accountable. Federal technology and telecommunica- tions programs have been plagued by a troubling lack of accountability and good governance. They would benefit from stronger oversight and a fresh look at elim- inating outdated regulations that are doing more harm than good. l End wasteful broadband spending policies. Many of the broadband spending policies being pursued by the current Administration are poised to waste taxpayer money while leaving rural communities and unconnected Americans behind. At the same time, the dramatic recent increases in funding through the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act mean that the federal government has more than enough resources to meet its broadband connectivity goals. Congress should therefore hold the agencies accountable so that taxpayer money is used effectively to promote broadband connectivity across the nation. To that end, the next Administration should instruct the various departments and agencies that are administering broadband infrastructure funds to direct those resources to communities without adequate Internet infrastructure instead of to places that already enjoy broadband connectivity. Take, for example, the final rules that the Treasury Department adopted in 2022 that govern the expenditure of $350 billion in ARPA funds. Rather than directing those dollars to the rural and other communities that have no Internet infrastructure, the current — 856 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Administration gave the green light for recipients to spend those funds to overbuild existing high-speed networks in communities that already have multiple broadband providers. A new Administration should eliminate government-funded overbuilding of existing networks. l Adopt a national coordinating strategy. Hundreds of billions of infrastructure dollars have been appropriated by Congress or budgeted by agencies over the past couple of years that can be used to end the digital divide. Yet, according to the U.S. Government Accountability Office, “U.S. broadband efforts are not guided by a national strategy”; instead, “[f]ederal broadband efforts are fragmented and overlapping, with more than 100 programs administered by 15 agencies,” risking overbuilding as well as wasteful duplication.26 Many of these programs remain plagued by inefficiency, further contributing to waste of limited taxpayer dollars. Moreover, the federal government is failing to put appropriate guardrails in place to govern the expenditure of billions in broadband funds. This is the regulatory equivalent of turning the spigot on full blast and then walking away from the hose. There is a worrisome lack of adequate tracking, measurement, and accountability standards governing all of this broadband spending. As a result, we are likely to see headline levels of waste, fraud, and abuse. A new Administration needs to bring fresh oversight to this spending and put a national strategy in place to ensure that the federal government adopts a coordinated approach to its various broadband initiatives. Similarly, the next Administration should ask the FCC to launch a review of its existing broadband programs, including the different components of the USF, with the goal of avoiding duplication, improving efficiency of existing programs, and saving taxpayer money. l Correct the FCC’s regulatory trajectory and encourage competition to improve connectivity. The FCC is a New Deal–era agency. Its history of regulation tends to reflect the view that the federal government should impose heavy-handed regulation rather than relying on competition and market forces to produce optimal outcomes. President Franklin D. Roosevelt recommended that Congress create the FCC in February 1934 for the purposes of establishing “a single Government agency charged with broad authority” over the field of communications.27 Congress subsequently established the FCC through the Communications Act of 1934. Congress has passed a number of additional statutes—some broad, some

Department of Energy and Related Commissions

Strong

Vector: 64%

Pages: 425-427AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The SAT Streamlining Act’s focus on expediting satellite licensing to boost U.S. commercial space competitiveness and innovation aligns closely with Project 2025’s goals of swiftly transferring space-related R&D advances to American private interests, ensuring benefits to Americans, and maintaining national security oversight."

Key themes:space industry competitivenesstechnology transfer to private sectornational security considerationsregulatory streamlininginnovation promotion

— 393 — Department of Energy and Related Commissions l Ensure that R&D funds are used for projects that protect and advance that edge. l Ensure that successful advances, with a focus on new natural resource development technologies, artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and space, are transferred swiftly to American interests in the private sector. New Policies l Focus on benefits to Americans. OTT’s operations should be based on the recognition that the new technologies generated by American taxpayers’ investment in DOE are a significant national security asset rather than some neutral scientific gift to humanity. l Increase oversight and coordination. OTT needs to be vigilant in overseeing and coordinating OTT offices associated with each National Lab. For security and economic espionage reasons, the work funded by the American people needs to be protected, and when commercialized, it needs to go to American businesses. OFFICE OF SCIENCE (SC) Mission/Overview The Office of Science (SC) supports and oversees research facilities and pro- grams that cover basic science through its application to the demonstration and deployment of energy technologies. SC oversees 10 of the 17 DOE National Labs and 28 major federal research user facilities. Its mission is to preserve U.S. leader- ship in science, fund and perform basic research, and provide the scientific facilities that the private sector is unable or unwilling to provide. New initiatives include quantum information sciences and artificial intelligence. SC is led by a Senate-con- firmed Director at the Assistant Secretary level and has eight program offices.82 Needed Reforms The next conservative President should commit the United States to scientific dominance to support national and economic security, especially in light of similar efforts by China. To aid in this effort, the Office of Science should: l Return to its primary mission: nonpartisan and basic science. SC’s mission should be international leadership in basic and early applied science and provision of world-leading facilities for this work. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and Inflation Reduction Act mark the major — 394 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise reorientation of DOE primarily from defense applications in the NNSA and basic and early applied science across SC and the applied offices to a massive federal research, development, demonstration, and commercialization body.83 Distraction from SC’s basic science mission should be prevented. l Increase the level of accountability. The National Laboratories need to be more directly accountable to the Secretary of Energy and Congress for their work and management. New Policies l Commit to U.S. science dominance. The United States is losing its dominance in scientific discoveries and technological development. China and other adversaries have been stealing American science and technology for years and are now on the verge of dominating science—a development that is fraught with negative strategic and economic implications for the United States. The next Administration must commit itself to ensuring that the U.S. continues to dominate scientific discovery and technological advancement. l Refocus on mission and eliminate duplication and waste. The Administration should work with Congress to rationalize the National Lab network to meet specific national objectives (such as the NNSA laboratories’ role in national defense) and conduct basic research that the private sector would not otherwise conduct. Activities that duplicate those of other government agencies or the private sector should be eliminated. l Properly manage the National Labs’ contributions to the private sector. SC should improve private-sector access to the National Labs, through programs like the GAIN voucher program and consistent with national security considerations, while ensuring that the economic benefits of taxpayer-funded technologies flow back to taxpayers through patent- review sharing or a revolving fund. Budget The Office of Science was appropriated slightly more than $7 billion in FY 2021, and DOE requested slightly less than $7.8 billion for FY 2023.84 OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (EM) Mission/Overview The Office of Environmental Management’s mission is to “complete the safe cleanup of [the] environmental legacy resulting from decades of nuclear

Federal Communications Commission

Moderate

Vector: 64%

Pages: 885-887AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"Both the SAT Streamlining Act and the Project 2025 FCC section aim to streamline FCC processes, enhance U.S. competitiveness, and improve interagency coordination, though the bill focuses on space licensing while Project 2025 emphasizes terrestrial spectrum and broadband infrastructure."

Key themes:FCC streamlininginteragency coordinationUS competitivenesslicensing efficiencyspectrum policy

— 853 — Federal Communications Commission are doing this is by giving Beijing access to their high-powered cloud computing services. Therefore, it is time for an Administration to put in place a comprehensive plan that aims to stop U.S. entities from directly or indirectly contributing to China’s malign AI goals. Unleashing Economic Prosperity. The FCC needs to advance a pro-growth agenda that gives every American a fair shot at next-generation connectivity. This is vital for economic opportunity and prosperous communities. The current Administration has appropriated a lot of money for broadband infrastructure proj- ects, but it has failed to pair that spending with reforms that free more airwaves for wireless connectivity or streamline the permitting processes for broadband builds. That failure is holding back America’s hardworking telecommunications crews and leaving Americans stuck waiting on the wrong side of the digital divide. It is time for a return to the successful spectrum and infrastructure policies that prevailed during the Trump Administration—policies that enabled the U.S. to lead the world in 5G. l Refill America’s spectrum pipeline. From 2017 through 2020, the FCC took unprecedented steps to free the airwaves needed to power 5G and other next-generation wireless services. This work not only helped to secure America’s wireless leadership and bolster competition, but also enabled the private sector to create jobs and grow the economy. Recently, the FCC has failed to match the pace and cadence of those spectrum actions. Therefore, the FCC and a new Administration should work together to develop a national spectrum strategy that both identifies the specific airwaves that the FCC can free for commercial wireless services and sets an aggressive timeline for agency action. l Facilitate coordination on spectrum issues. Wireless services now play a central role in advancing America’s economic and national security interests. Over the past few years, this dynamic has led to an increasing number of headline-level disputes between the commercial wireless sector and federal agencies. These disputes are often framed in zero-sum terms as commercial wireless and federal agency stakeholders argue over the appropriate types and amount of airwaves that the government should allocate for various purposes. On the one hand, America’s global economic leadership depends on its ability to free spectrum that will power the U.S. commercial wireless industry. On the other hand, we must ensure that America’s national security and other federal agencies have access to the spectrum resources that they need to carry out their vital missions. — 854 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise It is clear that the current process is not delivering optimal outcomes. In December 2021 and January 2022, for instance, the lack of interagency coordination and communication about mid-band 5G spectrum allocation between the FCC and the Federal Aviation Authority led to significant challenges for the U.S. aviation industry. Over the past two years, the FCC has failed to move spectrum into the commercial marketplace at the same pace and cadence that it did in the recent past. Creating better mechanisms to improve communication and cooperation between different federal agencies could enable a more effective and coordinated U.S. government telecommunications strategy. The White House should work with Congress to establish a spectrum coordination process that will work for both commercial and federal users. l Modernize infrastructure rules. By 2016, the construction of new cell sites—the building blocks for 5G—had essentially flatlined in America. Because of outdated permitting rules, it cost too much and took too long to build wireless infrastructure, so the FCC went to work. The agency updated the environmental and historic preservation rules that needlessly drove up the cost and slowed down the timeline for adding small cells. The FCC put in place guardrails to address outlier fees and delays imposed at the state and local levels on those same small-cell projects. It modernized the permitting process in several additional ways as well. Those FCC reforms delivered results. They allowed America’s private sector to bring thousands of families across the digital divide and to keep Americans connected during the pandemic. In fact, infrastructure builds accelerated at a record pace after those reforms. In 2019, for instance, U.S. providers built over 46,000 new cell sites—a sixty-fivefold increase over 2016 levels. The FCC has not engaged in any similar infrastructure reforms in recent years, and there is much more that needs to be done. For instance, the FCC’s prior reforms focused on streamlining the rules for small wireless facilities. The FCC should now explore similar action for the deployment of other wired infrastructure by imposing limits on the fees that local and state governments can charge for reviewing those wireline applications and time restrictions on the government’s decision-making process. The next Administration should also work to address the delays that continue to persist when it comes to building Internet infrastructure on federal lands. This is an area where the FCC itself has very little jurisdiction,

Financial Regulatory Agencies

Weak

Vector: 63%

Pages: 866-868AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The SAT Streamlining Act aims to expedite FCC satellite licensing, while the Project 2025 section targets SEC and CFTC enforcement and administrative reforms; both share a broad goal of reducing regulatory burden and improving agency efficiency, but they address different sectors and mechanisms."

Key themes:regulatory streamliningagency efficiencyreducing administrative burdenprocess modernization

— 833 — Financial Regulatory Agencies l Eliminate all administrative proceedings (APs) within the SEC except for stop orders related to defective registration statements. The SEC enforcement system does not need to have both district court cases and APs. Alternatively, respondents should be allowed to elect whether an adjudication occurs in the SEC’s administrative law court or an ordinary Article III federal court.24 l End the practice of delegating the decision to initiate an enforcement case. The SEC Chairman—and possibly the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO)—should study whether other Commission delegation of authority to staff should be narrowed and whether sunsetting of such delegation of authority should be required. Congress should: l Require an Inspector General’s (or possibly a GAO) report regarding SEC information technology spending and contracting. Spending appears to be much too high, and IT contracting is poorly managed. l Statutorily limit the time for an investigation to two years with no extensions. Long investigations harm private parties and the quality of justice. With adequate management processes, the SEC should not need more than two years even for complicated matters. The SEC Chairman should: l Dramatically reduce the number of direct reports to the SEC Chairman. l Merge SEC offices that are performing similar functions. l Reduce the number of managers per employee. CFTC ADMINISTRATION AND IMPROVED COMMODITIES AND DERIVATIVES MARKETS Congress should: l Modernize the definition of commodity (which is now largely a laundry list of agricultural commodities)25 and clarify the treatment of digital assets. l Clarify through an express amendment to the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA)26 the circumstances that require a foreign swap trading platform to — 834 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise register with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) as a swap execution facility (SEF) under Sections 2(i)27 and 5h28 of the CEA. Currently, it is not clear whether having one or a small number of U.S. participants would require SEF registration under prior staff guidance, which has led foreign swap trading platforms to exclude all U.S. persons from their platforms or to go through the process of seeking an exemption from registration. l Amend Section 2 of the CEA to authorize the CFTC Chairman to remove the agency’s Executive Director without a Commission vote. l To augment Commissioners’ independence, establish funding amounts for the Commissioners’ offices by statute with adjustments for inflation, with no requirement for a Commissioner to obtain budget or expense approvals from the Chairman or the agency’s administrative staff. The CFTC should: l Allocate more resources to core agency functions rather than ancillary and support operations. l Replace the existing position limits rule, which reduces liquidity and makes markets more volatile, with further delegation of authority to the exchanges to set position limits and position accountability levels where appropriate for the relevant market. l Reduce overly prescriptive rules implementing the CFTC’s core principles. l Apply the definitions of “U.S. Person” and “Guarantee” in the CFTC’s 2020 rule on cross-border application of swaps regulations (2020 Cross-Border Rule)29 to the regulatory requirements that remain covered by the CFTC’s 2013 guidance on the subject (2013 Guidance).30 Currently, the definition of each of these foundational terms differs depending on whether the requirement in question is covered by the 2020 Cross-Border Rule or the 2013 Guidance. l Remove the regulatory categories of “affiliate conduit” and “foreign consolidated subsidiary” from the 2013 Guidance and the CFTC’s cross- border rule on margin for uncleared swaps,31 respectively. These categories were replaced by the concept of a “Significant Risk Subsidiary” for purposes of the 2020 Cross-Border Rule because of widespread market confusion and compliance difficulties arising from their broad and vague scope.

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Sen. Cruz, Ted

Illegal Red Snapper and Tuna Enforcement Act

119/s/283

Modernizing Access to Our Public Oceans Act

119/s/759

Protect College Sports Act of 2026

119/s/4668

Back to All Bills