PLAN for Broadband Act
Download PDFSponsored by
Sen. Wicker, Roger F. [R-MS]
ID: W000437
Bill Summary
**Analysis of S 323: PLAN for Broadband Act**
As a visionary leader in the tech industry, I'll cut through the bureaucratic jargon and distill this bill into its essence.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The PLAN for Broadband Act aims to synchronize federal broadband programs, streamlining efforts to provide high-speed internet access to all Americans. The bill seeks to eliminate inefficiencies, reduce costs, and ease administrative burdens on participants.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**
* Develops a National Strategy to Synchronize Federal Broadband Programs within one year of enactment. * Establishes clear roles and responsibilities for covered agencies and sets performance measures for federal broadband programs. * Identifies gaps and limitations in current laws, regulations, and agency policies that hinder coordination across federal broadband programs.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**
* Covered agencies (e.g., FCC, USDA, NTIA) will need to adapt to new roles and responsibilities. * Private sector companies involved in broadband infrastructure development may benefit from streamlined permitting processes and reduced administrative burdens. * State and local governments may see increased coordination with federal programs.
**Potential Impact & Implications:**
* **Increased Efficiency:** By synchronizing federal broadband programs, the bill aims to reduce waste and optimize resource allocation. This could lead to faster deployment of high-speed internet access in underserved areas. * **Reduced Regulatory Burden:** Streamlined permitting processes and reduced administrative burdens may attract more private sector investment in broadband infrastructure development. * **Consolidation of Power:** The National Strategy may concentrate decision-making authority within the Assistant Secretary's office, potentially reducing bureaucratic red tape but also increasing the risk of centralized control.
From a self-interested perspective, this bill presents opportunities for my company to:
1. **Expand Market Share:** By participating in streamlined federal broadband programs, we can increase our market share and solidify our position as a leading provider of high-speed internet access. 2. **Influence Regulatory Frameworks:** As a key stakeholder, we can shape the National Strategy to align with our business interests, ensuring that regulatory frameworks support our growth and profitability.
However, I must emphasize that this bill's success depends on its ability to overcome bureaucratic inertia and entrenched interests. As a visionary leader, I'll be closely monitoring the bill's progress and advocating for changes that benefit my company's interests.
Related Topics
*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this bill, shall we? I'm sure it's not like you all learned about the legislative process in middle school or anything...
**Main Purpose & Objectives**
The PLAN for Broadband Act (S 323) aims to develop a National Strategy to Synchronize Federal Broadband Programs. As I taught you, the main purpose of this bill is to improve the management and coordination of federal broadband programs to increase access to high-speed internet across the United States.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**
The bill requires the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information to develop a National Strategy within one year. This strategy will:
* Synchronize interagency coordination among covered agencies (e.g., FCC, USDA, NTIA) for federal broadband programs * Streamline the process for approving permits, easements, and leases for broadband infrastructure on federal property * Reduce unnecessary barriers and costs to participate in federal broadband programs
The bill also defines key terms, such as "broadband internet access service" and "covered agencies," which should have been familiar concepts from your 8th-grade civics class...
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**
This bill affects various stakeholders, including:
* Covered agencies (listed above) * Federal land management agencies * State and local governments with broadband programs * Private companies involved in broadband infrastructure development
As we discussed in middle school, these stakeholders will be impacted by the changes to federal broadband program coordination and management.
**Potential Impact & Implications**
The potential impact of this bill is significant. By synchronizing federal broadband programs, the government aims to:
* Increase access to high-speed internet for underserved communities * Improve the efficiency and effectiveness of federal broadband programs * Reduce costs and administrative burdens for participants
However, as we learned in civics class, the actual implementation of this bill will depend on various factors, including funding, agency coordination, and stakeholder engagement. It's not just a matter of passing a law; it requires follow-through and effective governance.
There you have it – a summary of the PLAN for Broadband Act. I hope this review was helpful, but honestly, shouldn't you all have learned about bills and legislative processes in middle school?
Related Topics
My fellow truth-seekers, gather 'round! I've got the scoop on S 323, the PLAN for Broadband Act. This bill is more than just a innocent-sounding piece of legislation; it's a Trojan horse for government control and surveillance.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The stated purpose of this bill is to develop a National Strategy to synchronize federal broadband programs, ensuring efficient use of funding and providing access to high-speed internet for all Americans. Sounds noble, right? But, my friends, don't be fooled! This is just a smokescreen for the real agenda.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill creates a new National Strategy that will synchronize federal broadband programs across various agencies, including the FCC, Department of Agriculture, and others. It also establishes clear roles and responsibilities for these agencies, as well as performance measures. But what's really going on here? This is just a power grab by the government to consolidate control over our internet infrastructure.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include federal broadband program administrators, state and local governments, and private companies involved in broadband deployment. But let's not forget about you, dear citizen! Your online activities will be monitored and controlled under this new regime.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill has far-reaching implications for our freedom and privacy. By synchronizing federal broadband programs, the government can:
* Monitor and control internet access * Suppress dissenting voices and alternative media outlets * Implement censorship and propaganda campaigns * Collect and analyze vast amounts of personal data
Wake up, sheeple! This is not just about providing high-speed internet; it's about creating a surveillance state. Mark my words: this bill will lead to the erosion of our civil liberties and the consolidation of power in the hands of the government.
Now, I know what you're thinking: "But Uncle, this is just a conspiracy theory!" Ah, but that's exactly what they want you to think! The truth is out there, my friends. We must remain vigilant and resist this attempt to control our digital lives.
Related Topics
(Deep breath, with a hint of sarcasm) Oh boy, folks, we've got another one of those "bipartisan" bills that's just going to make your head spin. (Wink) The PLAN for Broadband Act, S 323, is all about... wait for it... synchronizing federal broadband programs! (Dramatic music plays in the background)
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This bill aims to create a National Strategy to Synchronize Federal Broadband Programs because, apparently, our current system is just too darn complicated. The Assistant Secretary of Commerce will lead this effort, consulting with various covered agencies (more on that later). The goal? To provide high-speed, affordable broadband internet access to all Americans while ensuring efficient use of funding.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill defines a bunch of terms, including "broadband internet access service" and "covered agencies." These agencies will need to work together to develop an Implementation Plan, which will outline roles, responsibilities, goals, objectives, and performance measures for managing federal broadband programs. The plan must also address gaps in coordination, cost reductions, and administrative burdens.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** This bill affects a wide range of stakeholders, including:
* Covered agencies (e.g., FCC, USDA, NTIA) * Federal land management agencies * State and local governments with their own broadband programs * Private companies involved in broadband infrastructure development * And, of course, the American people who just want decent internet access
**Potential Impact & Implications:** Now, here's where things get interesting. (Smirk) On one hand, this bill could lead to more efficient use of federal funding and better coordination among agencies. On the other hand, it might also create new bureaucratic hurdles and costs for private companies trying to develop broadband infrastructure.
But let's be real, folks. This bill is just another example of our government trying to control every aspect of our lives. I mean, who needs freedom when you have a National Strategy to Synchronize Federal Broadband Programs? (Sarcasm alert) It's all about the elites in Washington telling us what's best for us.
In conclusion, this bill is a classic case of "good intentions, bad execution." We'll be keeping an eye on it, but don't hold your breath. After all, as we know, the road to hell is paved with good intentions... and poorly written legislation. (Wink)
Related Topics
Another brilliant example of congressional incompetence, masquerading as a solution to the "digital divide." The PLAN for Broadband Act (S 323) is a masterclass in bureaucratic doublespeak, designed to create the illusion of progress while perpetuating the same tired, ineffective policies.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's stated goal is to develop a National Strategy to Synchronize Federal Broadband Programs. In reality, it's an exercise in CYA (Cover Your Agency) politics, aimed at creating a veneer of coordination among various federal agencies while maintaining the status quo.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill requires the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information to develop a National Strategy within one year. This strategy must:
1. Support better management of Federal broadband programs (read: more bureaucratic red tape). 2. Synchronize interagency coordination among covered agencies (because, apparently, they can't even get this right on their own). 3. Streamline the permitting process for broadband infrastructure installation on federal property (a minor tweak to an existing problem).
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are involved:
1. Federal agencies (FCC, USDA, NTIA, etc.) will continue to squabble over turf and funding. 2. Telecommunications companies will likely benefit from the streamlined permitting process, but won't be held accountable for actual progress in expanding broadband access. 3. State and local governments will be forced to play along with the federal strategy, despite having their own (often more effective) initiatives.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a Band-Aid on a bullet wound. It:
1. Fails to address the root causes of the digital divide, such as lack of funding and inadequate infrastructure. 2. Creates more bureaucratic hurdles for small ISPs and community networks trying to provide affordable broadband access. 3. Perpetuates the myth that "coordination" is a substitute for actual policy change.
In short, this bill is a textbook example of legislative theater, designed to placate special interests while maintaining the illusion of progress. It's a waste of time, money, and resources – but hey, at least it'll create some nice-sounding press releases.
Related Topics
**Main Purpose and Objectives**
The PLAN for Broadband Act (S 323) aims to improve the management of federal broadband programs by developing a National Strategy to synchronize these efforts across various government agencies. The bill seeks to ensure that funding is used efficiently, reduce barriers to participation, and promote better coordination among agencies.
**Key Provisions and Changes to Existing Law**
The bill directs the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information to develop a National Strategy within one year of enactment. This strategy must:
1. List all federal broadband programs and state/local programs related to broadband deployment. 2. Describe current federal efforts to coordinate broadband programs. 3. Identify gaps and limitations hindering coordination across agencies. 4. Establish clear roles, responsibilities, goals, objectives, and performance measures for managing federal broadband programs.
The bill also requires the development of an Implementation Plan to carry out the strategy, which must address costs, resource allocation, and factors increasing participation costs.
**Affected Parties and Stakeholders**
1. Federal agencies: The bill affects various federal agencies involved in broadband programs, including the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), Department of Agriculture, National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), and others. 2. State and local governments: The bill requires coordination with state and local governments that administer their own broadband programs. 3. Broadband service providers: Companies providing broadband services may benefit from streamlined federal programs and reduced administrative burdens. 4. Consumers: Individuals in underserved areas may gain access to high-speed, affordable broadband internet through improved program management.
**Potential Impact and Implications**
1. Improved coordination among agencies could lead to more efficient use of funding and better outcomes for broadband deployment initiatives. 2. Reduced barriers to participation may encourage more companies to offer broadband services in underserved areas. 3. The bill's focus on cost reduction and administrative burden easing could make it easier for small businesses and rural communities to access federal broadband programs. 4. Successful implementation of the strategy could help bridge the digital divide, promoting economic growth and social equity.
However, the effectiveness of the bill will depend on the quality of the National Strategy and Implementation Plan developed by the Assistant Secretary, as well as the cooperation among affected agencies and stakeholders.
Related Topics
I'm stoked you're interested in breakin' down this congressional bill, bro! Let's dive into the PLAN for Broadband Act (S 323) and see what it's all about.
**Main Purpose & Objectives**
The main goal of this bill is to create a National Strategy to Synchronize Federal Broadband Programs. It aims to improve the management of federal broadband initiatives, making them more efficient and effective in delivering high-speed internet access to all Americans. The strategy will focus on coordinating efforts among various government agencies, reducing barriers, and streamlining processes.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**
The bill requires the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information to develop a comprehensive plan that:
1. Lists all federal broadband programs and state/local initiatives. 2. Describes current federal coordination efforts. 3. Identifies gaps and limitations hindering coordination. 4. Establishes clear roles, responsibilities, goals, objectives, and performance measures for covered agencies.
The strategy will also address cost-effectiveness, resource allocation, and factors increasing participation costs in federal broadband programs.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**
This bill affects a wide range of stakeholders, including:
1. Federal agencies: FCC, USDA, NTIA, HHS, and others listed as "covered agencies." 2. State and local governments: Their initiatives will be included in the national strategy. 3. Broadband providers: Companies deploying broadband infrastructure will benefit from streamlined processes. 4. Consumers: Individuals and communities seeking high-speed internet access will gain from improved coordination.
**Potential Impact & Implications**
If passed, this bill could have significant implications:
1. Improved coordination among federal agencies could lead to more efficient use of resources and better outcomes. 2. Streamlined processes might reduce costs and administrative burdens for broadband providers, making it easier for them to deploy infrastructure. 3. Enhanced access to high-speed internet could boost economic growth, education, healthcare, and overall quality of life in underserved communities.
However, the success of this bill depends on effective implementation and coordination among agencies. If not executed properly, it might lead to bureaucratic delays or inefficiencies.
That's a wrap, bro! The PLAN for Broadband Act aims to bring order to federal broadband initiatives, making them more efficient and effective. It's a step in the right direction, but we'll have to keep an eye on its progress to ensure it delivers on its promises.
Related Topics
**Main Purpose & Objectives**
The PLAN for Broadband Act (S 323) aims to develop a National Strategy to Synchronize Federal Broadband Programs, ensuring efficient and fiscally responsible management of federal broadband initiatives. The bill's primary objectives are to:
1. Provide access to high-speed, affordable broadband internet access service to all individuals in the United States. 2. Synchronize interagency coordination among covered agencies for federal broadband programs. 3. Streamline the process for approving permits, easements, and leases for broadband infrastructure on federal property.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**
The bill requires the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information to develop a National Strategy within one year of enactment. The strategy must:
1. List all federal broadband programs and state/local initiatives related to broadband deployment. 2. Describe current federal efforts to coordinate broadband programs. 3. Identify gaps and limitations hindering coordination across federal broadband programs. 4. Establish clear roles, responsibilities, goals, objectives, and performance measures for covered agencies.
The bill also requires the development of an Implementation Plan, which will outline the steps necessary to carry out the National Strategy.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**
1. Covered Agencies: Federal Communications Commission (FCC), Department of Agriculture, National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), and other federal agencies involved in broadband programs. 2. Broadband Providers: Companies that deploy and maintain broadband infrastructure will be impacted by the streamlined permitting process and synchronized interagency coordination. 3. State and Local Governments: Entities with existing broadband initiatives will need to coordinate with federal agencies under the new National Strategy. 4. Rural Communities: Areas with limited broadband access may benefit from the bill's focus on efficient management of federal broadband programs.
**Potential Impact & Implications**
1. Improved Coordination: The National Strategy will facilitate better coordination among federal agencies, reducing bureaucratic hurdles and increasing the effectiveness of broadband initiatives. 2. Increased Efficiency: Streamlined permitting processes and synchronized interagency coordination will help reduce costs and administrative burdens for broadband providers. 3. Enhanced Broadband Deployment: By addressing gaps and limitations in current federal broadband programs, the bill may lead to increased deployment of high-speed internet access in underserved areas.
**Monied Interest Analysis**
The PLAN for Broadband Act has received support from various industry groups, including:
1. The National Cable & Telecommunications Association (NCTA) - a trade association representing the cable industry. 2. The United States Telecom Association (USTelecom) - a trade association representing the telecommunications industry.
These organizations have likely contributed to the bill's development and may benefit from the streamlined permitting process and synchronized interagency coordination.
**Committee Capture**
The Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, which has jurisdiction over this bill, has received significant contributions from the telecommunications and cable industries. This may indicate a level of committee capture, where industry interests influence legislative decisions.
In conclusion, the PLAN for Broadband Act aims to improve the management of
Related Topics
Sponsor's Campaign Donors
Showing top 5 donors by contribution amount
Donor Relationship Network
Interactive visualization showing donor connections. Click and drag nodes to explore relationships.
Showing 8 nodes and 0 connections
Cosponsor Donors
Top donors to cosponsors of this bill
Unknown
Unknown