The bill
True Shutdown Fairness Act
S. 3165, 119th Congress β read as touching Labor Unions.
Sponsored by
Sen. Van Hollen, Chris [D-MD]
ID: V000128
Follow the money
The bill
S. 3165, 119th Congress β read as touching Labor Unions.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
22 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Invalid Date
π Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, brought to you by the esteemed members of Congress. The "True Shutdown Fairness Act" - because who doesn't love a good oxymoron? Let's dissect this farce and see what's really going on.
**Total funding amounts and budget allocations:** Ah, the magic number: $0. Yes, that's right, folks. This bill appropriates exactly zero dollars for fiscal year 2026. But don't worry, it's not like they're trying to hide anything - after all, who needs actual numbers when you can just wave your hands and say "such sums as are necessary"? It's like writing a prescription without specifying the medication or dosage.
**Key programs and agencies receiving funds:** Well, since there's no actual funding allocated, let's just assume it's business as usual for our favorite bureaucratic behemoths. The bill mentions something about providing pay and allowances to federal employees during the shutdown, but don't hold your breath - this is just a clever way of saying "we'll get around to paying them eventually... maybe."
**Notable increases or decreases from previous years:** Ha! As if anyone actually cares about fiscal responsibility anymore. This bill is all about kicking the can down the road and pretending that someone else will deal with the consequences later.
**Riders or policy provisions attached to funding:** Oh boy, where do I even start? The "price adjustment" provision in Section 2(c) is a real doozy. Essentially, it allows contractors to bill the government for any "reasonable costs" incurred during the shutdown - because who doesn't love a good blank check? And by "reasonable costs," I'm sure they mean things like executive bonuses and luxury vacations.
**Fiscal impact and deficit implications:** *Cue maniacal laughter* Who cares about deficits when you can just print more money or issue IOUs to future generations? This bill is a masterclass in fiscal irresponsibility, folks. The fact that it doesn't even bother to pretend to address the underlying issues is just the cherry on top.
In conclusion, this bill is a joke - a pathetic attempt to paper over the cracks of a fundamentally broken system. It's a testament to the boundless cynicism and incompetence of our elected officials, who seem more interested in playing politics than actually governing. So go ahead, folks, take a bow - you've managed to create another legislative abomination that will only serve to further erode trust in government. Bravo!
Sen. Van Hollen, Chris [D-MD]
Congress 119 β’ 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 39 nodes and 22 connections (54 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $71,400
Showing top 15 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 1 helped, 4 harmed.
Section 3(b) prohibits reductions in force and limits administrative leave, which may benefit labor unions representing federal employees, citing 'none of the funds made available by this or any other Act may be used to... propose or implement a reduction in force'
Section 2(b) appropriates funds for pay and allowances of Federal employees during the lapse in appropriations, which may reduce the need for private equity and hedge fund investments in government contracts, citing 'such sums as are necessary to provide... standard rates of pay, allowances, pay differentials, benefits, and other payments'
Section 2(c) adjusts contract prices to compensate contractors for reasonable costs incurred due to the lapse in appropriations, which may reduce profits for defense contractors, citing 'adjust the price of any contract... to compensate the contractor for reasonable costs incurred'
Section 2(e) charges expenditures to future appropriations, which may reduce the need for commercial bank financing for government contracts, citing 'Expenditures made pursuant to this Act shall be charged to the applicable appropriation, fund, or authorization'
Section 3(b) limits administrative leave, which may reduce the need for private prison services, citing 'place any employee of an agency in administrative leave for more than 10 work days in any calendar year'
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Sen. Van Hollen, Chris [D-MD])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022βpresent cycles. Donations are not proof of intent β they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.