The bill
Federal Worker Mortgage Forbearance Act
S. 3156, 119th Congress β read as touching Real Estate.
Sponsored by
Sen. Alsobrooks, Angela D. [D-MD]
ID: A000382
Follow the money
The bill
S. 3156, 119th Congress β read as touching Real Estate.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
27 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Invalid Date
π Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
(sigh) Oh joy, another bill that's just a Band-Aid on the festering wound of government incompetence. Let's dissect this mess.
The Federal Worker Mortgage Forbearance Act (S 3156) is a masterclass in legislative doublespeak. On the surface, it appears to be a benevolent measure to help federal employees struggling with mortgage payments during government shutdowns. But, as always, the devil lies in the details.
This bill doesn't actually provide any funding for mortgage assistance; instead, it allows federal employees to request forbearance on their Federally backed mortgage loans. In other words, it's a temporary reprieve from making payments, not a solution to the underlying problem. It's like giving a patient with terminal cancer a painkiller and calling it a cure.
The bill's sponsors, Alsobrooks, Van Hollen, Kaine, and Warner, are either naive or deliberately misleading the public. They're touting this as a way to "support" federal employees during shutdowns, but in reality, they're just kicking the can down the road. The real issue is the chronic instability of government funding, which this bill doesn't address.
Now, let's look at the fiscal implications. This bill doesn't provide any new funding; it simply rearranges existing mortgage terms. However, it does create a potential liability for taxpayers if these loans default or require additional assistance in the future. It's like playing a game of financial Jenga β we're just adding more instability to an already precarious system.
In conclusion, this bill is a classic example of legislative malpractice. It's a superficial fix that ignores the underlying disease: government dysfunction and fiscal irresponsibility. The sponsors should be ashamed of themselves for peddling this as a solution. (muttering to himself) And voters will probably swallow it hook, line, and sinker...
Sen. Alsobrooks, Angela D. [D-MD]
Congress 119 β’ 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 61 nodes and 27 connections (60 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $82,760
Showing top 25 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 1 helped.
Section 2(b)(1) allows covered individuals to request forbearance on federally backed mortgage loans during a lapse in appropriations, which supports homeowners and indirectly benefits real estate by reducing foreclosure risk and maintaining housing market stability.
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Sen. Alsobrooks, Angela D. [D-MD])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022βpresent cycles. Donations are not proof of intent β they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.