AM Radio for Every Vehicle Act of 2025

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/s/315
Last Updated: September 7, 2026

Sponsored by

Sen. Markey, Edward J. [D-MA]

ID: M000133

Follow the money

The bill

AM Radio for Every Vehicle Act of 2025

S. 315, 119th Congress — read as touching Print & Broadcast Media.

The sponsor

Sen. Markey, Edward J. [D-MA]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$72,200 raised

22 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

55% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Transportation" section, p. 658-660 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 39.

April 2, 2025

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another masterpiece of legislative theater. The "AM Radio for Every Vehicle Act of 2025" - because what the American people really need is more static-filled AM radio in their cars. Let's dissect this farce.

**New regulations being created or modified:** This bill requires the Secretary of Transportation to issue a rule mandating access to AM broadcast stations in passenger motor vehicles. Because, apparently, the free market isn't doing its job in providing adequate entertainment options for drivers.

**Affected industries and sectors:** The automotive industry will be forced to install AM radio equipment as standard in all new vehicles. Radio broadcasters will likely see an increase in listenership, but at what cost? The bill also mentions "digital audio AM broadcast stations," which is just a fancy way of saying "we're trying to make AM radio relevant again."

**Compliance requirements and timelines:** Manufacturers have two years to comply with the new regulations, after which they'll be forced to include AM radios in all new vehicles. Because nothing says "innovation" like being forced to install outdated technology.

**Enforcement mechanisms and penalties:** The bill doesn't specify any enforcement mechanisms or penalties for non-compliance. But don't worry, I'm sure the Secretary of Transportation will have a team of highly trained bureaucrats ready to swoop in and fine manufacturers into submission.

**Economic and operational impacts:** This bill is a classic case of regulatory capture. The National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) has been lobbying for this kind of legislation for years, and now they've got their wish. The automotive industry will be forced to absorb the costs of installing AM radios, which will likely be passed on to consumers. And what about the environmental impact of all those extra radios? Who cares?

The real disease here is the corrupting influence of special interest groups on our legislative process. This bill is a symptom of a larger problem - the willingness of politicians to do the bidding of their corporate donors, no matter how ridiculous or outdated the request.

In short, this bill is a joke. It's a solution in search of a problem, and it will only serve to line the pockets of radio broadcasters and automotive manufacturers at the expense of consumers and taxpayers. But hey, who needs innovation or progress when you can have AM radio?

Related Topics

Telecommunications & Broadband Access
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Sen. Markey, Edward J. [D-MA]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$599,464
297 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$2,000
Committees
$0
Individuals
$597,464

No PAC contributions found

1
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
2 transactions
$2,000

No committee contributions found

1
DONOHUE, JOHN
2 transactions
$9,900
2
HARRIS, WILLIAM SR.
3 transactions
$9,500
3
SWIG, MARY
3 transactions
$7,600
4
MARCHAND, PAUL
3 transactions
$7,500
5
ABRAMS, JEFFREY J.
2 transactions
$6,600
6
BRADLEY, DAVID
2 transactions
$6,600
7
BRADLEY, KATHERINE BRITTAIN
2 transactions
$6,600
8
BUTLER, ANDREW
2 transactions
$6,600
9
CARDWELL, NEAL
2 transactions
$6,600
10
CONWAY, RONALD C.
2 transactions
$6,600
11
DOUGLAS, MICHAEL
2 transactions
$6,600
12
GOLDBERG, BENNETT H.
2 transactions
$6,600
13
GOLDBERG, CAROL B.
2 transactions
$6,600
14
GOLDBERG, HENRY H.
2 transactions
$6,600
15
GUTTMAN KLEIN, DANIELLE
2 transactions
$6,600
16
KLEIN III, ROB
2 transactions
$6,600
17
KLEIN, ROBERT N. II
2 transactions
$6,600
18
LANDRY, BARRIE
2 transactions
$6,600
19
MANOCHERIAN, JED
2 transactions
$6,600
20
MCGRATH, KATHLEEN
2 transactions
$6,600
21
MERRIGAN, JOHN A.
2 transactions
$6,600
22
MUNGER, PHILIP R.
2 transactions
$6,600
23
RESNICK, LYNDA RAE
2 transactions
$6,600
24
RESNICK, STEWART A.
2 transactions
$6,600
25
ROBINSON, FRANCES
2 transactions
$6,600
26
RUBIN, MILES
2 transactions
$6,600
27
RUBIN, NANCY
2 transactions
$6,600
28
SAKELLARIS, GEORGE P.
2 transactions
$6,600
29
TOCCO, JESSICA BEESON
2 transactions
$6,600
30
WEISSMAN, ANN
2 transactions
$6,600
31
WEISSMAN, IRVING
2 transactions
$6,600
32
WESTLY, STEVEN
2 transactions
$6,500
33
ATKINS, CHET G.
2 transactions
$6,000
34
BRILLIANT, LARRY B
2 transactions
$6,000
35
ANDELSON, MICHELE
2 transactions
$5,000
36
JOHNSTON, PHILIP
2 transactions
$5,000
37
KARGMAN, WILLIAM M.
2 transactions
$5,000
38
ROSS, GARY
2 transactions
$5,000
39
SRIDHAR, KR
2 transactions
$5,000
40
ZEVNIK, PAUL A.
3 transactions
$4,300
41
WHITE, ROBERT F.
2 transactions
$4,200
42
MOUTOUDIS, EVANGELOS
2 transactions
$3,800
43
BOYLE, JAMES
4 transactions
$3,500
44
BAER, WILLIAM
1 transaction
$3,300
45
BENDER, GRACE
1 transaction
$3,300
46
BOGER, JOSHUA
1 transaction
$3,300
47
CROLL, DAVID D.
1 transaction
$3,300
48
CROWLEY, MATTHEW
1 transaction
$3,300
49
HUNDT, REED
1 transaction
$3,300
50
JONES, DAVID
1 transaction
$3,300
51
LUDWIG, EUGENE A.
1 transaction
$3,300
52
MAKIHARA, JUN
1 transaction
$3,300
53
MOUTOUDIS, ELEFTHERIA
1 transaction
$3,300
54
PIERCE, DAVID
1 transaction
$3,300
55
RIVERA GAMARRA, LILIANA
1 transaction
$3,300
56
SANT, ROGER W.
1 transaction
$3,300
57
SCHMIDT, WENDY
1 transaction
$3,300
58
SWIG, STEVEN
2 transactions
$3,300
59
UNGER, KATHLEEN
1 transaction
$3,300
60
UNGER, STEPHEN
1 transaction
$3,300
61
WEISS, DANIEL
1 transaction
$3,300
62
EMMET, HENRY
4 transactions
$3,250
63
NIEMCZEWSKI, CHRIS
1 transaction
$3,231
64
TEPPER, YANIV
1 transaction
$3,200
65
CAFRITZ, JANE
1 transaction
$3,000
66
GUERNSEY, SHERWOOD
2 transactions
$3,000
67
TANZI, RUDOLPH
1 transaction
$3,000
68
BROWNELL, ANNE
5 transactions
$3,000
69
HOQUE, MAKSUDUL
1 transaction
$2,900
70
KLEIN, ISRAEL
1 transaction
$2,900
71
NESSEL, ARIEL
1 transaction
$2,900
72
BAUER, PETER
2 transactions
$2,800
73
MORNINGSTAR, RICHARD
1 transaction
$2,800
74
SYED, BADRA
1 transaction
$2,700
75
BROSNAN, KEELY
1 transaction
$2,500
76
DERDERIAN, JAMES
2 transactions
$2,500
77
PRIOR, MICHAEL T.
1 transaction
$2,500
78
RESOR, GRIFF
5 transactions
$2,500
79
SOBRATO, JOHN M
1 transaction
$2,500
80
SILVERSTEIN, PATRICIA
1 transaction
$2,400
81
SILVERSTEIN, ROGER
1 transaction
$2,400
82
BAYLISS, KIM KOONTZ
1 transaction
$2,300
83
NORTON, CHARLES F. JR.
2 transactions
$2,300
84
VALLEE, JAMES
1 transaction
$2,263
85
MORRIS, SARA
3 transactions
$2,200
86
BERKOWITZ, ROGER F.
1 transaction
$2,000
87
BUSH, ANTOINETTE
2 transactions
$2,000
88
CLARK, BRIAN M
1 transaction
$2,000
89
DOHERTY, REGINA QUINLAN
1 transaction
$2,000
90
GLYNN, THOMAS P. III
1 transaction
$2,000
91
GOLD, PAULA
3 transactions
$2,000
92
HALSTROM, FREDERIC
1 transaction
$2,000
93
HARRINGTON, MICHAEL J.
2 transactions
$2,000
94
LAW, DONALD
2 transactions
$2,000
95
LEVIN, BLAIR
1 transaction
$2,000
96
MACDONALD, ALEX
3 transactions
$2,000
97
MANNING, MARY JO
4 transactions
$2,000
98
MOELLER, JANE
1 transaction
$2,000
99
MURPHY, JOHN
2 transactions
$2,000
100
SEGEL, ARTHUR I.
1 transaction
$2,000
101
SHAH, ANIKET
1 transaction
$2,000
102
WILKINS, JON S. JR.
1 transaction
$2,000
103
RAMER, BRUCE
1 transaction
$1,720
104
VRADENBURG, GEORGE III
2 transactions
$1,600
105
BELL, DAWN
1 transaction
$1,500
106
BENCHLEY, WENDY
2 transactions
$1,500
107
BURBANK, STEPHEN
3 transactions
$1,500
108
D'ALESSANDRO, DAVID
1 transaction
$1,500
109
GOODFRIEND, DAVID
2 transactions
$1,500
110
LASALA, BARRY
1 transaction
$1,500
111
RAPPAPORT, SUSAN
3 transactions
$1,500
112
TAVLARIDES, MARK
2 transactions
$1,500
113
SELLIKEN, JOSEPH
2 transactions
$1,300
114
PAPOULIAS-SAKELLARIS, CATHERINE
1 transaction
$1,200
115
ALCALDE, HECTOR
1 transaction
$1,000
116
ATHY, ANDREW JR.
1 transaction
$1,000
117
BALIAN, RITA
2 transactions
$1,000
118
BARTLETT, JACOB
1 transaction
$1,000
119
BARTLETT, JOHN
1 transaction
$1,000
120
BENINCASA, JUSTIN D.
1 transaction
$1,000
121
BOYLE, LEO V.
1 transaction
$1,000
122
BRENNAN, JACK
1 transaction
$1,000
123
CARR, RYAN
1 transaction
$1,000
124
CARROLL, JOHN J. JR.
1 transaction
$1,000
125
CHOWDHURY, NUSRAT J
1 transaction
$1,000
126
COOK WILTON, KATHY JO
1 transaction
$1,000
127
DELEON, RUDY
1 transaction
$1,000
128
DEYST, JOHN
1 transaction
$1,000
129
DORE, LAWRENCE H JR
1 transaction
$1,000
130
FARRAH, LOUIS J II
1 transaction
$1,000
131
FEINGOLD, ELLEN
2 transactions
$1,000
132
FIELDS, JACK M. JR.
1 transaction
$1,000
133
FINEBERG, HARVEY
1 transaction
$1,000
134
FLAHERTY, SEAN
1 transaction
$1,000
135
FLORESCU, JOHN
1 transaction
$1,000
136
GOLDBERG, FRED
1 transaction
$1,000
137
GOLDBERG, WENDY
1 transaction
$1,000
138
GOO, MICHAEL
2 transactions
$1,000
139
GORE, MARY T
1 transaction
$1,000
140
HADLEY, CHRISTOPHER
1 transaction
$1,000
141
HAND, LLOYD
1 transaction
$1,000
142
HARE, BRENDAN
1 transaction
$1,000
143
HARRINGTON, MICHAEL
1 transaction
$1,000
144
HENNESSEY, JOHN W
2 transactions
$1,000
145
HIGGINS, ROBERT F.
1 transaction
$1,000
146
HORMEL, RAMPA
1 transaction
$1,000
147
HOSSAIN, AKMAL MD
1 transaction
$1,000
148
HULL, MEGAN
1 transaction
$1,000
149
IANNELLA, CHRISTOPHER JR.
1 transaction
$1,000
150
JACOBS, PATRICIA
1 transaction
$1,000
151
JEPPSON, JOHN
1 transaction
$1,000
152
JOHNSON, DOUGLAS
1 transaction
$1,000
153
JONES, PATRICK
1 transaction
$1,000
154
KAUFFMAN, RICHARD
1 transaction
$1,000
155
KAZI, MUAZZAM
1 transaction
$1,000
156
KELLEHER, TIMOTHY C. III
1 transaction
$1,000
157
KOUNTOUPES, LISA M.
1 transaction
$1,000
158
LACAMERA, PAUL
2 transactions
$1,000
159
LEBLANC, MARIANNE
1 transaction
$1,000
160
LEITER, DAVID
1 transaction
$1,000
161
LENEHAN, PAMELA
1 transaction
$1,000
162
LEON, JUSTIN
1 transaction
$1,000
163
LOYLESS, BETSY
1 transaction
$1,000
164
MABEY, MARY
1 transaction
$1,000
165
MAHONEY, SHELAGH E
1 transaction
$1,000
166
MARTIN, BRAD
1 transaction
$1,000
167
MATTHEWS, KATHLEEN C.
1 transaction
$1,000
168
MCCARRON, ROBERT J.
1 transaction
$1,000
169
MEEHAN, MARTIN T.
1 transaction
$1,000
170
MINAHAN, ALFRED A.
2 transactions
$1,000
171
MINAHAN, JOANNE & AL
1 transaction
$1,000
172
MONSUR, MOHAMMED A.
1 transaction
$1,000
173
MURPHY, LYNDA
1 transaction
$1,000
174
NURUZZAMAN, QUAZI M.
1 transaction
$1,000
175
O'CONNELL, DANIEL
1 transaction
$1,000
176
O'CONNELL, MARILYN LYNG
1 transaction
$1,000
177
ORTNER, CHARLES
1 transaction
$1,000
178
OTTAWAY, ALEXANDRA
2 transactions
$1,000
179
PENDERGAST, EDWARD
1 transaction
$1,000
180
PERGAMENT, RUSSEL
1 transaction
$1,000
181
POMERANCE, RAFE
1 transaction
$1,000
182
RAHMAN, ASHIKUR
1 transaction
$1,000
183
RAISER, MARY M.
1 transaction
$1,000
184
RODOPHELE, ROBERT P.
1 transaction
$1,000
185
ROOSEVELT JR., JAMES
2 transactions
$1,000
186
RUSSO, JANE L
1 transaction
$1,000
187
SANFILIPPO, ANGELA
1 transaction
$1,000
188
SCHNED, HARRY
1 transaction
$1,000
189
SEYMOUR, JANE
1 transaction
$1,000
190
SHAW, RHOD M.
1 transaction
$1,000
191
SHEFF, DOUGLAS K.
1 transaction
$1,000
192
SIMON, NEAL S.
1 transaction
$1,000
193
SLAIMAN, GARY D.
1 transaction
$1,000
194
SMITH, JAMES E.
1 transaction
$1,000
195
SOLOMONT, ALAN
1 transaction
$1,000
196
STOTTLEMYER, JUSTIN
1 transaction
$1,000
197
STREISAND, BARBARA
1 transaction
$1,000
198
TARRICONE, ANTHONY
1 transaction
$1,000
199
TRAVAGLINI, ROBERT E.
1 transaction
$1,000
200
VERMA, VISHAL
1 transaction
$1,000
201
WHITE, ROBERT M.
1 transaction
$1,000
202
ZIEGLER, BART
1 transaction
$1,000
203
BOYLE, JIM
2 transactions
$1,000
204
KEARNEY, BERNADETTE
1 transaction
$800
205
NAGLE, ROBERT
1 transaction
$800
206
BOYLE, ANNE C.
1 transaction
$700
207
DYM, BARRY
1 transaction
$600
208
PEABODY, GEORGE
1 transaction
$600
209
WALDRON, GERARD
1 transaction
$600
210
AFREEN, AL BELI
1 transaction
$500
211
AINSWORTH, PETER
1 transaction
$500
212
ALI, REZA
1 transaction
$500
213
ANDELSON, AMY
1 transaction
$500
214
AYOUB, PAUL JOSEPH
1 transaction
$500
215
BACHMAN, KATHARINE E.
1 transaction
$500
216
BALBONI, PHILIP
1 transaction
$500
217
BERMAN, ROGER L.
1 transaction
$500
218
BLAIS, CRAIG L.
1 transaction
$500
219
BRAMANTE, SALVATORE
1 transaction
$500
220
BRESKIN, JULIE
1 transaction
$500
221
BROWN, ANN
1 transaction
$500
222
CETRULO, LAWRENCE
1 transaction
$500
223
COSTELLO, MICHAEL C.
1 transaction
$500
224
COWELL, STEPHEN
1 transaction
$500
225
CUNNINGHAM, BOBBY
1 transaction
$500
226
DELELLO, ROBERT A.
1 transaction
$500
227
GLICKMAN, JONATHAN B.
1 transaction
$500
228
HALPERT, STUART
1 transaction
$500
229
HAMMERLE, TERESE
1 transaction
$500
230
HARTNETT, PAUL J. JR.
1 transaction
$500
231
HECK, BOBBIE
1 transaction
$500
232
HENN, JOHN
1 transaction
$500
233
HILLIS, JANETTE
1 transaction
$500
234
IADAROLA, ELIZABETH
1 transaction
$500
235
JAMES, CLAUDIA
1 transaction
$500
236
JOYCE, MICHAEL
1 transaction
$500
237
KAHN, THOMAS
1 transaction
$500
238
KATEB, BABAK
1 transaction
$500
239
KENEALY, EDMUND
1 transaction
$500
240
KOEHLER, MIKE
1 transaction
$500
241
KORNBLUH, KAREN
1 transaction
$500
242
KORNGOLD, ADAM
1 transaction
$500
243
KWAN, SHU MAY
1 transaction
$500
244
LEAKE, ALEXANDRA
1 transaction
$500
245
LEAL, MARIAN SUSAN
1 transaction
$500
246
LIGUORI, RAFFAELE R
1 transaction
$500
247
LIPSON, FRAN
1 transaction
$500
248
LONERGAN, PAUL A.
1 transaction
$500
249
LORSCH, PATRICIA M.
1 transaction
$500
250
LOW, STEPHANIE
1 transaction
$500
251
LUTZ, FRED T
1 transaction
$500
252
MAGUIRE MEEHAN, JENNIFER
1 transaction
$500
253
MAHONEY, MARY R.
1 transaction
$500
254
MARCUS, JESSICA
1 transaction
$500
255
MCCARTHY, JOHN
1 transaction
$500
256
MCGLYNN JR., JOHN J.
1 transaction
$500
257
MEANS, ROSEANNA
1 transaction
$500
258
MITROPOULOS, NICHOLAS T.
1 transaction
$500
259
MONE, MICHAEL
1 transaction
$500
260
MOSHE, YARIV
1 transaction
$500
261
MOULTON, DAVID
1 transaction
$500
262
NOURI, KEYVAN
1 transaction
$500
263
O'NEILL, BRIAN T.
1 transaction
$500
264
OBRIEN, ANDREW
1 transaction
$500
265
OLEARY, JAMES
1 transaction
$500
266
PAONE, MARTIN
1 transaction
$500
267
PARKER, GLENN
1 transaction
$500
268
PATERNITI, RICHARD
1 transaction
$500
269
PERETZ, ANNE
1 transaction
$500
270
RAFSHOON, EDEN
1 transaction
$500
271
REGUNBERG, MICHAL
1 transaction
$500
272
REICHMAN, JUDITH
1 transaction
$500
273
RICCA, JOSEPH A
1 transaction
$500
274
RIZZOLO, CAROL
1 transaction
$500
275
ROTENBERG, MICHAEL
1 transaction
$500
276
ROYCE, JACQUELINE
1 transaction
$500
277
RUGEL, AMY
1 transaction
$500
278
SABAGH, DENYSE
1 transaction
$500
279
SARKISIAN, ELLEN
1 transaction
$500
280
SEGARS, CHARLES
1 transaction
$500
281
SMITH, ABBE Y.
1 transaction
$500
282
SOISSON, AMY M.
1 transaction
$500
283
SOLOMON, KENNETH
1 transaction
$500
284
STEFANINI, JOHN AUGUSTO
1 transaction
$500
285
SUTTON, BARBARA
1 transaction
$500
286
SYKES, BRIAN F
1 transaction
$500
287
THOMPSON, KENNETH
1 transaction
$500
288
WALKER, KEVIN
1 transaction
$500
289
WOLFE, STEVEN
1 transaction
$500
290
WOLLACK, RICHARD
1 transaction
$500
291
WORLEY, RICHARD
1 transaction
$500

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX]

ID: C001098

Top Contributors

52

1
WINRED
PACARLINGTON, VA
$1,167,293
Nov 1, 2024
2
WINRED
PACARLINGTON, VA
$330,599
Nov 5, 2024
3
FASKEN MANAGEMENT
OrganizationMIDLAND, TX
$10,000
May 24, 2023
4
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF HARRISON COUNTY
OrganizationMARSHALL, TX
$4,000
Oct 16, 2024
5
FOLAD ENTERPRISES LLC
OrganizationPINELLAS PARK, FL
$2,000
May 20, 2024
6
BALCH & BINGHAM LLP
OrganizationBIRMINGHAM, AL
$1,000
May 20, 2024
7
PARTNERS HOTEL GROUP LLC
OrganizationMURPHY, TX
$1,000
Jun 7, 2023
8
KHAT INVESTMENS LLC
OrganizationMIDLAND, TX
$1,000
Jun 30, 2023
9
PJB INVESTMENT ADVISORS LLC
OrganizationADDISON, TX
$800
May 1, 2024
10
GRANT MORELAND LP LLC
OrganizationGILMER, TX
$750
Sep 19, 2024

Sen. Baldwin, Tammy [D-WI]

ID: B001230

Top Contributors

72

1
WISCONSIN MEDICAL SOCIETY FEDERAL POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (WISMEDFEDPAC)
CONDUIT TOTAL LISTED IN AGG. FIELD
PACFITCHBURG, WI
$2,500
Mar 22, 2024
2
REALTORS DIRECT GIVER PROGRAM
CONDUIT TOTAL LISTED IN AGG. FIELD
COMMADISON, WI
$600
Mar 4, 2024
3
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMM
OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN
$10,000
Oct 30, 2024
4
TUNICA-BILOXI TRIBE OF LA
OrganizationMARKSVILLE, LA
$5,000
Nov 5, 2024
5
SALT RIVER PIMA MARICOPA INDIAN COMMUNITY
OrganizationSCOTTSDALE, AZ
$3,300
Aug 1, 2023
6
CHEROKEE NATION
OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK
$3,300
Sep 16, 2024
7
HABEMATOLEL POMO OF UPPER LAKE
OrganizationUPPER LAKE, CA
$3,300
Sep 25, 2024
8
PECHANGA BAND OF LUISENO INDIANS
OrganizationTEMECULA, CA
$3,300
Sep 25, 2024
9
SMITH LACIEN LLP
OrganizationCHICAGO, IL
$3,300
Aug 12, 2024
10
SMITH LACIEN LLP
OrganizationCHICAGO, IL
$3,300
Aug 12, 2024

Sen. Banks, Jim [R-IN]

ID: B001299

Top Contributors

21

1
STOCKAMP FOUNDATION
OrganizationCOLUMBIA CITY, IN
$100
Feb 26, 2024
2
NEAL, ROLLIE
RETIRED • RETIRED
IndividualCLARKSBURG, WV
$13,068
Mar 12, 2023
3
NEAL, ROLLIE
IndividualCLARKSBURG, WV
$13,068
Mar 21, 2023
4
SALAMONE, CHRISTOPHER J
IndividualFAIRPORT, NY
$12,000
Feb 8, 2024
5
BARKLEY, JOSH
BARKLEY BUILDERS INC • GENERAL CONTRACTOR
IndividualOSSIAN, IN
$6,700
Apr 3, 2023
6
THRIFT, PAUL
THOMPSON THRIFT • CEO
IndividualTERRE HAUTE, IN
$6,700
Feb 28, 2023
7
MUSELMAN, ROGER C.
DRG HOLDINGS, LLC • CHAIRMAN
IndividualBERNE, IN
$6,700
Mar 28, 2023
8
WALTERS, KENNETH
JAYCO • PRESIDENT AND CEO
IndividualGRANGER, IN
$6,700
Sep 1, 2023
9
DUMEZICH, DANA A.
RETIRED • RETIRED
IndividualMARCO ISLAND, FL
$6,600
Jun 15, 2023
10
RAMSEY, JASON
IndividualBREVARD, NC
$6,600
May 8, 2023

Sen. Barrasso, John [R-WY]

ID: B001261

Top Contributors

32

1
POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS
COMATMORE, AL
$3,300
May 24, 2023
2
POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS
COMATMORE, AL
$3,300
Sep 20, 2024
3
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
COMLOS ANGELES, CA
$2,500
Dec 31, 2024
4
ALABAMA-COUSHATTA TRIBE
COMLIVINGSTON, TX
$1,000
Jun 29, 2023
5
MUSCOGEE CREEK NATION
COMOKMULGEE, OK
$1,000
Oct 30, 2024
6
TO PROTECT OUR HERITAGE
OrganizationSKOKIE, IL
$5,000
Jun 26, 2024
7
TO PROTECT OUR HERITAGE
OrganizationSKOKIE, IL
$5,000
Jun 26, 2024
8
EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS
OrganizationCHEROKEE, NC
$3,300
Jun 11, 2024
9
EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS
OrganizationCHEROKEE, NC
$3,300
Jun 11, 2024
10
UTE INDIAN TRIBE
OrganizationFORT DUCHESNE, UT
$3,300
Nov 13, 2024

Sen. Blackburn, Marsha [R-TN]

ID: B001243

Top Contributors

26

1
FRIENDS OF COMMUNITY ONCOLOGY PAC
PACVIRGINIA BEACH, VA
$5,000
Apr 12, 2023
2
THE COGGIN GROUP
OrganizationMURFREESBORO, TN
$2,900
Mar 9, 2023
3
THE COGGIN GROUP
OrganizationMURFREESBORO, TN
$2,500
Mar 9, 2023
4
DOSS BROTHERS FARM
OrganizationLAWRENCEBURG, TN
$1,000
Apr 17, 2024
5
DOSS BROTHERS FARM
OrganizationLAWRENCEBURG, TN
$1,000
Mar 18, 2024
6
BL PARTNERS GROUP LLC
OrganizationARLINGTON, VA
$500
Mar 17, 2023
7
KING, RODNEY W.
SELF-EMPLOYED • ATTORNEY
IndividualGERMANTOWN, TN
$13,200
Apr 4, 2024
8
BEAN, BILL G.
HANNING & BEAN ENTERPRISES INC. • REAL ESTATE INVESTOR
IndividualCOLUMBIA CITY, IN
$10,000
May 1, 2024
9
SMITH, THOMAS
PRESCOTT INVESTORS INC. • INVESTOR
IndividualBOCA RATON, FL
$10,000
May 13, 2024
10
GAMBLE, KATHRYN
UNAKA CO • BUSINESS EXECUTIVE
IndividualDALLAS, TX
$9,900
Jul 15, 2024

Sen. Blumenthal, Richard [D-CT]

ID: B001277

Top Contributors

20

1
OLSON, LYNDON
NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED
IndividualWACO, TX
$3,300
Dec 20, 2024
2
ALIX, JAY
ALIX PARTNERS • FOUNDER
IndividualBIRMINGHAM, MI
$3,300
Oct 2, 2023
3
KIM, CHRISTINE M.
BBB LLC • ATTORNEY
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$3,300
Oct 31, 2023
4
ALIX, JAY
ALIX PARTNERS • FOUNDER
IndividualBIRMINGHAM, MI
$3,300
Apr 15, 2024
5
ROURE, RITA
PAGNY - LINCOLN HOSPITAL • PHYSICIAN
IndividualGREENWICH, CT
$3,300
Apr 10, 2024
6
ROURE, RITA
PAGNY - LINCOLN HOSPITAL • PHYSICIAN
IndividualGREENWICH, CT
$3,300
Apr 10, 2024
7
CHAVEZ, TOM
KRUX INC. • CEO
IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA
$3,300
Jul 13, 2024
8
CHAVEZ, TOM
KRUX INC. • CEO
IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA
$3,300
Jul 13, 2024
9
JONES, JERRY C.
LIVERAMP INC. • EXECUTIVE
IndividualLITTLE ROCK, AR
$3,300
Sep 19, 2024
10
NESSEL, ARIEL
NESSEL DEVELOPMENT • OWNER
IndividualROSS, CA
$3,300
Jul 12, 2024

Sen. Britt, Katie Boyd [R-AL]

ID: B001319

Top Contributors

26

1
POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS
OrganizationATMORE, AL
$3,300
Sep 14, 2023
2
POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS
OrganizationATMORE, AL
$3,300
Oct 11, 2024
3
CHEROKEE NATION
OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK
$2,500
Oct 29, 2024
4
HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP
OrganizationRICHMOND, VA
$1,000
Jul 25, 2024
5
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN
$1,000
May 1, 2024
6
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN
$1,000
Nov 9, 2023
7
STRONG, MIRANDA
CALISTA • DIRECTOR OF GOVERNMENT RELATIONS
IndividualANCHORAGE, AK
$5,000
Sep 20, 2023
8
STEPHENS, TYLER
FIERCE GOVERNMENT RELATIONS • LOBBYIST
IndividualWASHINGTON, DC
$3,300
Jul 1, 2023
9
SINGER, PAUL
ELLIOTT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT • CO-CEO, CO-CIO, PRESIDENT
IndividualPALM BEACH, FL
$3,300
Jul 6, 2023
10
SINGER, PAUL
ELLIOTT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT • CO-CEO, CO-CIO, PRESIDENT
IndividualPALM BEACH, FL
$3,300
Jul 9, 2023

Sen. Budd, Ted [R-NC]

ID: B001305

Top Contributors

20

1
MACFARLANE, RON
IndividualBUFFALO GROVE, IL
$13,068
Apr 10, 2024
2
HEGYI, ALBERT P MR.
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$6,600
Dec 31, 2024
3
NAZIROV, ATABEK
UZDIF • CEO
IndividualCHARLOTTE, NC
$6,600
Sep 14, 2023
4
NAZIROV, ATABEK
IndividualCHARLOTTE, NC
$6,600
Sep 26, 2023
5
FROST, BRANT IV
SELF-EMPLOYED • FINANCIAL SERVICES
IndividualNEWNAN, GA
$3,300
Dec 31, 2024
6
FROST, KRISTA
HOMEMAKER • HOMEMAKER
IndividualNEWNAN, GA
$3,300
Dec 31, 2024
7
TAYLOR, WILLIAM MR.
VETERANS GUARDIAN VA CLAIM CONSULTING • BUSINESS OWNER
IndividualPINEHURST, NC
$3,300
Dec 7, 2023
8
TAYLOR, WILLIAM MR.
VETERANS GUARDIAN VA CLAIM CONSULTING • BUSINESS OWNER
IndividualPINEHURST, NC
$3,300
Dec 7, 2023
9
GREENBLATT, SCOTT MR.
VETERANS GUARDIAN • CEO
IndividualPINEHURST, NC
$3,300
Dec 8, 2023
10
GREENBLATT, SCOTT MR.
VETERANS GUARDIAN • CEO
IndividualPINEHURST, NC
$3,300
Dec 8, 2023

Sen. Cantwell, Maria [D-WA]

ID: C000127

Top Contributors

70

1
SAC FOX TRIBE
OrganizationTAMA, IA
$5,000
Oct 29, 2024
2
LOWER ELWHA KLALLAM TRIBE
OrganizationPORT ANGELES, WA
$3,360
Mar 31, 2023
3
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationHIGHLAND, CA
$3,300
Oct 28, 2023
4
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationHIGHLAND, CA
$3,300
Dec 21, 2023
5
SAN PABLO LYTTON TRIBE
OrganizationSAN PABLO, CA
$3,300
Nov 16, 2023
6
SAN PABLO LYTTON TRIBE
OrganizationSAN PABLO, CA
$3,300
Nov 16, 2023
7
SAULT STE MARIE TRIBE OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS
OrganizationSAULT SAINTE MARIE, MI
$3,300
Dec 14, 2023
8
SENECA NATION OF INDIANS
OrganizationSALAMANCA, NY
$3,300
Dec 14, 2023
9
MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE
OrganizationAUBURN, WA
$3,300
May 12, 2023
10
NISQUALLY INDIAN TRIBE
OrganizationOLYMPIA, WA
$3,300
Jun 30, 2023

Sen. Capito, Shelley Moore [R-WV]

ID: C001047

Top Contributors

23

1
CHEROKEE NATION
OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK
$2,800
Dec 31, 2024
2
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN
$1,000
Nov 8, 2023
3
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN
$1,000
Jul 22, 2024
4
ARNOLD, JOHN MR.
RETIRED • RETIRED
IndividualHOUSTON, TX
$6,600
Dec 27, 2023
5
MANOCHERIAN, JENNIFER MS.
RETIRED • RETIRED
IndividualSCARSDALE, NY
$6,600
Feb 17, 2023
6
MANOCHERIAN, JED MR.
SELF • REAL ESTATE
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$6,600
Feb 23, 2023
7
MANOCHERIAN, GREG MR.
SELF EMPLOYED • REAL ESTATE
IndividualPOUND RIDGE, NY
$6,600
Mar 1, 2023
8
MANOCHERIAN, KIM
PANAM EQUITIES • EXECUTIVE
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$6,600
Mar 27, 2023
9
KAY, ALISON MS.
KIDS CAPITAL • HEDGE FUND MANAGER
IndividualBEVERLY HILLS, CA
$6,600
Jun 20, 2023
10
MANDELBLATT, DANIELLE
DMM PROPRIETA MANAGEMENT • MANAGER
IndividualASPEN, CO
$6,600
Sep 26, 2024

Donor Network - Sen. Markey, Edward J. [D-MA]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 35 nodes and 59 connections

Total contributions: $59

Top Donors - Sen. Markey, Edward J. [D-MA]

Showing top 15 donors by contribution amount

1 Org14 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 2 helped, 1 harmed.

  • Section 3(a)(1) requires devices that can receive signals and play content transmitted by AM broadcast stations to be installed as standard equipment in passenger motor vehicles, which benefits AM broadcast stations by ensuring their content is accessible in vehicles, thereby supporting the print & broadcast media industry.

  • −Automotive (Legacy)confidence 0.85

    Section 3(a)(1) imposes a cost on automotive manufacturers by requiring them to install AM radio receiving devices as standard equipment in passenger motor vehicles, which may increase production costs and affect legacy automakers (automotive industry).

  • +Telecommunicationsconfidence 0.80

    Section 3(a)(3) allows compliance via devices that can receive digital audio AM broadcast stations, which may benefit telecommunications companies involved in broadcasting technology and signal transmission, though the primary benefit is to broadcast media.

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Sen. Markey, Edward J. [D-MA])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HELPS

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Transportation

Weak
Vector: 62%
Pages: 658-660AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on mandating AM radio receivers for emergency alerts, while the Project 2025 DOT excerpt discusses spectrum allocation for intelligent transportation systems and fuel economy standards; both involve DOT oversight of vehicle safety but share little substantive policy overlap."

Key themes:DOT oversightvehicle safetyemergency alertsautomotive regulation

— 626 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise environment. They need to account for rapidly moving and out-of-line-of-sight vehicles as well as pedestrians, bicyclists, and other road users. They should account for the potential for radio interference, and they should address security. This is why in 1999, in response to a request from Congress, the Federal Com- munications Commission allocated the 5.9 GHz band of spectrum to traffic safety and intelligent transportation systems (ITS). In 2020, the FCC took away 45 MHz of the 75 MHz it had added, leaving only 30 MHz for transportation safety and ITS. DOT needs to represent the transportation community and make the case for needed spectrum to the public and Congress. CORPORATE AVERAGE FUEL ECONOMY (CAFE) STANDARDS One reason for the high numbers of injuries on American roadways is that national fuel economy standards raise the price of cars, disincentivizing people from purchasing newer, safer vehicles. Congress requires the Secretary of Transportation to set national fuel econ- omy standards for new motor vehicles sold in the United States. This mandate was established in the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 (EPCA),6 a law passed in the wake of the Arab oil embargo to promote greater energy efficiency and lessen the national security threat of U.S. dependence on foreign oil. The stat- ute directs DOT to prescribe the “maximum feasible” mileage requirements for different categories of internal-combustion engine (ICE) automobiles for each model year. The standards must be achievable using available ICE technologies running on gasoline, diesel fuel, or similar combustible fuels and must not be set so high as to prevent automakers from profitably producing new vehicles at sufficient volume to meet consumer demand. Congress recognized that the ICE-powered automobile has been instrumen- tal to advancing the mobility and prosperity of the American people and that the domestic mass production of new ICE vehicles generates millions of jobs and remains critical to the overall health of the U.S. economy and the strength of the nation’s industrial base. Accordingly, Congress took care to ensure that the mileage requirements issued by DOT would not undermine the vitality of America’s auto industry or interfere with the market economics that drives consumer demand for new vehicles. This rulemaking authority, which has been delegated by the Secretary to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, is exclusive to DOT. EPCA expressly preempts states from adopting or enforcing any different requirement “related to fuel economy standards” for new motor vehicles. While the statute instructs DOT to consult with the Department of Energy and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in formulating its standards, no other federal agency, including EPA, has clear authority to set fuel economy requirements in place of NHTSA. The Clean Air Act7 gives EPA general authority to establish emissions — 627 — Department of Transportation limits for new motor vehicles for air pollutants that are found to pose a danger to humans. However, there is no reason to believe Congress ever contemplated that EPA’s authority to address automotive air pollution might be used to displace or supersede NHTSA’s fuel economy mandate under EPCA. Congress chose to assign the power to set fuel economy standards to DOT rather than EPA. This was not only because DOT understands the technologies and economics of the auto industry, but also because NHTSA is the nation’s leading motor vehicle safety regulator, and Congress sought to ensure that fuel economy requirements would not adversely affect highway safety. Unfortunately, the Biden Administration has flouted these statutory limitations in nearly every respect. The predictable result is higher expected transportation costs for Americans. l In pursuit of an anti–fossil fuel climate agenda never approved by Congress, the Biden Administration has raised fuel economy requirements to levels that cannot realistically be met by most categories of ICE vehicles. The purpose is to force the auto industry to transition away from traditional technologies to the production of electric vehicles (EVs) and compel Americans to accept costly EVs despite a clear and persistent consumer preference for ICE-powered vehicles. In further support of this agenda, federal regulators administer a scheme of generous fuel economy credits that subsidize EV producers such as Tesla at the expense of legacy automakers. l Moreover, and contrary to Congress’s design, the Biden EPA has been given preeminence in the regulation of fuel economy through the setting of carbon dioxide emissions limits for new motor vehicles under the Clean Air Act. Because carbon dioxide emissions levels correspond to mileage in automobiles powered by fossil fuels, these EPA rules are de facto fuel economy requirements that apply independently of NHTSA’s standards. l The Biden Administration has also granted California a special waiver under the Clean Air Act that permits the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to issue its own fuel economy directives, notwithstanding EPCA’s prohibition on state standards. Under this waiver, CARB has ordered automakers to phase out the sale of ICE-powered automobiles in California and transition to the production of zero-emission vehicles by 2035. The Clean Air Act allows other states to follow California’s requirements; thus, CARB is effectively determining fuel economy policies for the entire nation. As a result of these regulatory actions, automobiles will be significantly more expensive to produce, there will be fewer affordable new vehicle options for Amer- ican families, and fewer new vehicles will be sold in the U.S. That will do more than

Department of Transportation

Weak
Vector: 62%
Pages: 658-660AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill mandates AM radio installation in vehicles for emergency alerts, which is a specific technology requirement, while Project 2025's DOT section emphasizes tech-neutrality, private-sector innovation, and reducing regulatory barriers—particularly for automated vehicles and spectrum allocation—rather than prescribing specific technologies like AM radio."

Key themes:Department of Transportationemergency alertsvehicle safetyradio spectrumregulatory policy

— 625 — Department of Transportation security, and privacy without hampering innovation. DOT can oversee the testing and deployment of a wide variety of new technologies, allowing communities and individuals to choose what best fits their needs. It is the role of the private sector, not the government, to pick winners and losers in technology development. If a technology underperforms, the private sector should be liable, not the government. The department should ensure a tech-neutral approach to addressing any emerging transportation technology while keeping safety as the number one priority. As part of this, it should work to facilitate the safe and full integration of automated vehicles into the national transportation system. Over time, these advanced technologies can save lives, transform personal mobility, and provide additional transportation opportunities—including for people with disabili- ties, aging populations, and communities where car ownership is expensive or impractical. NHTSA’s and FMCSA’s current regulations were written before the advent of automated vehicles and driving systems. Both operating administrations have issued Advance Notices of Proposed Rulemakings (ANPRMs) that begin the pro- cess of updating their regulations to reflect this new technology. However, these regulations have stalled under the Biden Administration, which has chosen to use the department’s tools to get people to take transit and drive electric vehicles instead of helping people to choose the transportation options that suit them best. l NHTSA should work to remove regulatory barriers by focusing on updating vehicle standards as well as publishing performance-based rules for the operations of automated vehicles (AVs). l FMCSA should work to clarify the regulations to align with DOT’s AV 3.0 guidance, which would allow the drivers to be safely removed from the operations of a commercial motor vehicle. From a nonregulatory point of view, DOT has pivoted from a successful focus on the voluntary sharing of data to improve safety outcomes to adoption of a more compulsory and antagonistic approach to mandating data collection and publica- tion through a Standing General Order related to automated vehicles. This needs to be reversed. Many of these new and innovative technologies rely on wireless communica- tions that depend on the availability and purchase of radio frequency spectrum, a trend that is consistent with what we see in connectivity in our everyday lives. There is a role for DOT in ensuring that in the fight over spectrum, transportation gets its fair share. For technologies to work in transportation, and in particular to work for transportation safety, they have to meet the unique needs of a transportation — 626 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise environment. They need to account for rapidly moving and out-of-line-of-sight vehicles as well as pedestrians, bicyclists, and other road users. They should account for the potential for radio interference, and they should address security. This is why in 1999, in response to a request from Congress, the Federal Com- munications Commission allocated the 5.9 GHz band of spectrum to traffic safety and intelligent transportation systems (ITS). In 2020, the FCC took away 45 MHz of the 75 MHz it had added, leaving only 30 MHz for transportation safety and ITS. DOT needs to represent the transportation community and make the case for needed spectrum to the public and Congress. CORPORATE AVERAGE FUEL ECONOMY (CAFE) STANDARDS One reason for the high numbers of injuries on American roadways is that national fuel economy standards raise the price of cars, disincentivizing people from purchasing newer, safer vehicles. Congress requires the Secretary of Transportation to set national fuel econ- omy standards for new motor vehicles sold in the United States. This mandate was established in the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 (EPCA),6 a law passed in the wake of the Arab oil embargo to promote greater energy efficiency and lessen the national security threat of U.S. dependence on foreign oil. The stat- ute directs DOT to prescribe the “maximum feasible” mileage requirements for different categories of internal-combustion engine (ICE) automobiles for each model year. The standards must be achievable using available ICE technologies running on gasoline, diesel fuel, or similar combustible fuels and must not be set so high as to prevent automakers from profitably producing new vehicles at sufficient volume to meet consumer demand. Congress recognized that the ICE-powered automobile has been instrumen- tal to advancing the mobility and prosperity of the American people and that the domestic mass production of new ICE vehicles generates millions of jobs and remains critical to the overall health of the U.S. economy and the strength of the nation’s industrial base. Accordingly, Congress took care to ensure that the mileage requirements issued by DOT would not undermine the vitality of America’s auto industry or interfere with the market economics that drives consumer demand for new vehicles. This rulemaking authority, which has been delegated by the Secretary to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, is exclusive to DOT. EPCA expressly preempts states from adopting or enforcing any different requirement “related to fuel economy standards” for new motor vehicles. While the statute instructs DOT to consult with the Department of Energy and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in formulating its standards, no other federal agency, including EPA, has clear authority to set fuel economy requirements in place of NHTSA. The Clean Air Act7 gives EPA general authority to establish emissions

Environmental Protection Agency

Weak
Vector: 60%
Pages: 458-460AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on mandating AM radio receivers in vehicles for emergency alerts, while the Project 2025 EPA section centers on reforming environmental regulations, emissions standards, and limiting EPA authority. The only connection is that both involve federal rulemaking affecting vehicle manufacturers, but their substantive goals diverge significantly."

Key themes:vehicle regulationfederal rulemakingcost impact analysis

— 425 — Environmental Protection Agency are statutorily required, and remove any regulatory differences between attainment and maintenance that are not explicitly required by law. l Streamline the process for state and local governments to demonstrate that their federally funded highway projects will not interfere with NAAQS attainment. l Adopt policies to prevent abuse of EPA’s CAA “error correction” authority.20 EPA historically has used this to coerce states into adopting its favored policies on pain of imposition of a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP). l Limit EPA’s reliance on CAA § 30121 general rulemaking authority to ensure that it is not abused to issue regulations for which EPA lacks substantive authority elsewhere in the statute. l If possible, return the standard-setting role to Congress. Climate Change l Remove the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) for any source category that is not currently being regulated. The overall reporting program imposes significant burdens on small businesses and companies that are not being regulated. This is either a pointless burden or a sword-of- Damocles threat of future regulation, neither of which is appropriate. l Establish a system, with an appropriate deadline, to update the 2009 endangerment finding. l Establish a significant emissions rate (SER) for greenhouse gasses (GHGs). Regulating Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) Under the American Innovation and Manufacturing (AIM) Act22 l Repeal Biden Administration implementing regulations for the AIM Act that are unnecessarily stringent and costly. l Refrain from granting petitions from opportunistic manufacturers to add new restrictions that further skew the market toward costlier refrigerants and equipment. — 426 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l Conduct realistic cost assessments that reflect actual consumer experiences instead of the current unrealistic ones claiming that the program is virtually cost-free. Mobile Source Regulation by the Office of Transportation and Air Quality l Establish GHG car standards under Department of Transportation (DOT) leadership that properly consider cost, choice, safety, and national security. l Review the existing “ramp rate” for car standards to ensure that it is actually achievable. l Include life cycle emissions of electric vehicles and consider all of their environmental impacts. l Restore the position that California’s waiver applies only to California- specific issues like ground-level ozone, not global climate issues. l Ensure that other states can adopt California’s standards only for traditional/criteria pollutants, not greenhouse gases. l Stop the use of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) to increase standards on airplanes. l Reconsider the Cleaner Trucks Initiative to balance the goal of driving down emissions without creating significant costs or complex burdens on the industry. Air Permitting Reforms for New Source Review (Pre-Construction Per- mits) and Title V (Operating Permits) l Develop reforms to ensure that when a facility improves efficiency within its production process, new permitting requirements are not triggered. l Restore the Trump EPA position on Once-In, Always-In (that major sources can convert to area sources when affiliated emissions standards are met). l Revisit permitting and enforcement assumptions that sources will operate 24 hours a day, 365 days a year; this artificially inflates a source’s potential to emit (PTE), which can result in more stringent permit terms.

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Full Policy Text

Related Bills