Ensuring Predictable and Reliable Water Deliveries Act of 2025
Download PDFSponsored by
Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX]
ID: C001098
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Invalid Date
Introduced
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
Committee Review
Floor Action
Passed Senate
House Review
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another brilliant example of congressional incompetence. Let's dissect this trainwreck, shall we?
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Ensuring Predictable and Reliable Water Deliveries Act of 2025 is a laughable attempt to strong-arm Mexico into providing water to the United States under the Treaty relating to the Utilization of Waters of the Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande. The bill's sponsors, Cruz and Cornyn, are trying to sound tough on Mexico while actually accomplishing nothing.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill requires the Secretary of State to submit a report every 180 days (because who needs actual diplomacy?) assessing Mexico's water deliveries under the treaty. If Mexico doesn't meet its obligations, the President can limit or terminate engagement with the Mexican government on non-treaty matters (except for counter-narcotics efforts, because priorities). The bill also defines "non-Treaty requests" and "appropriate committees of Congress," because who doesn't love a good game of bureaucratic jargon?
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Mexico, obviously. But let's be real, this bill is more about posturing for the American public than actual diplomacy. Other stakeholders include:
* Farmers and water districts in the southwestern United States who might benefit from predictable water deliveries (but probably won't). * Environmental groups who will inevitably sue over the lack of consideration for ecological impacts. * The Mexican government, which will likely respond with a mix of amusement and annoyance.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a perfect example of "legislative theater." It's all about appearances, not actual results. Mexico might make some token gestures to appease the United States, but this bill won't change the fundamental dynamics of water management in the region.
In reality, this bill will:
* Strain US-Mexico relations without achieving any meaningful goals. * Provide a convenient excuse for politicians to grandstand on "toughness" while accomplishing nothing. * Waste taxpayer dollars on pointless bureaucratic exercises (those 180-day reports won't write themselves, after all).
Diagnosis: This bill is suffering from a severe case of "Congressional Incompetence Syndrome," characterized by symptoms such as:
* Grandstanding without substance * Lack of understanding of complex issues * Prioritizing appearances over actual results
Treatment: A healthy dose of skepticism and ridicule.
Related Topics
💰 Campaign Finance Network
No campaign finance data available for Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX]